Interpretable machine learning models for predicting clinical pregnancies associated with surgical sperm retrieval from testes of different etiologies: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between surgical sperm retrieval of different etiologies and clinical pregnancy is unclear. We aimed to develop a robust and interpretable machine learning (ML) model for predicting clinical pregnancy using the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) association of surgical sperm retrieval from testes of different etiologies. METHODS: A total of 345 infertile couples who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment with surgical sperm retrieval due to different etiologies from February 2020 to March 2023 at the reproductive center were retrospectively analyzed. The six machine learning (ML) models were used to predict the clinical pregnancy of ICSI. After evaluating the performance characteristics of the six ML models, the Extreme Gradient Boosting model (XGBoost) was selected as the best model, and SHAP was utilized to interpret the XGBoost model for predicting clinical pregnancies and to reveal the decision-making process of the model. RESULTS: Combining the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, brier score, and the area under the precision-recall (P-R) curve (AP), the XGBoost model has the best performance (AUROC: 0.858, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.778-0.936, accuracy: 79.71%, brier score: 0.151). The global summary plot of SHAP values shows that the female age is the most important feature influencing the model output. The SHAP plot showed that younger age in females, bigger testicular volume (TV), non-tobacco use, higher anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), lower follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in females, lower FSH in males, the temporary ejaculatory disorders (TED) group, and not the non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) group all resulted in an increased probability of clinical pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The XGBoost model predicts clinical pregnancies associated with testicular sperm retrieval of different etiologies with high accuracy, reliability, and robustness. It can provide clinical counseling decisions for patients with surgical sperm retrieval of various etiologies.

Association between embryo morphokinetic development and intracytoplasmic sperm injection with epididymal sperm via time-lapse imaging.

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of sperm source on embryo morphokinetics and the clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles by considering the clustering of data (multiple embryos per patient that share a comparable developmental timing). This matched cohort study was performed at a private university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center. Women who underwent ICSI with epididymal sperm between January 2019 and December 2020 (the percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration group, n = 32 cycles) were matched with women who underwent ICSI with ejaculated sperm because of idiopathic male factor infertility (the male factor infertility [MFI] group, n = 32 cycles) or female infertility (the control group, n = 32 cycles). Embryos were cultured in a time-lapse imaging incubator, and morphokinetic development was recorded and compared among the groups. Significantly slower divisions were observed in embryos derived from epididymal sperm than in those derived from the MFI and control groups. Embryos derived from epididymal sperm had a significantly lower KIDScore (3.1 ± 0.2) than did those derived from ejaculated spermatozoa from the MFI (5.4 ± 0.1) and control (5.6 ± 0.2, p < 0.001) groups. Epididymal sperm-derived embryos showed a significantly greater occurrence of multinucleation (23.2%) than did those derived from ejaculated sperm from the MFI and control groups (2.8% and 3.7%, p < 0.001, respectively). Epididymal sperm-derived embryos were significantly more likely to undergo direct or reverse cleavage (11.1%) than ejaculated sperm-derived embryos in the control group (4.3%, p = 0.001). In conclusion, delayed cell cleavage and increased incidences of blastomere multinucleation and abnormal cleavage patterns are observed when epididymal-derived sperm are used for ICSI.

Estimation of B-inhibin and anti mullerian hormone in functional azoospermia and their correlations with surgical sperm retrieval: A prospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: The current study estimated the levels of anti mullerian hormone (AMH) and inhibin-B and reproductive hormones in non obstructive azoospermic (NOA) cases and obstructive azoospermic (OA) cases as well as comparing between them as regards the sensitivity and specificity in determining the sperm retrieval hope in the NOA cases. Finally, we analyzed any potential correlation between all the hormones measured in the current study. METHODS: The current case control study was conducted at the andrology outpatient clinic from June (2021) to March (2022). The study recruited 135 participants divided equally into three groups NOA cases, OA cases and controls, respectively. RESULTS: The mean inhibin-B was significantly lower in the NOA cases compared to the OA cases and the controls. There was a positive moderate correlation between AMH and Inhibin-B. Also, there was a positive moderate correlation between inhibin-B and free testosterone (FT) and positive weak correlation between beta Inhibin and leutinizing hormone (LH). CONCLUSIONS: The current study asserts the observation that inhibin-B is also expressed by Leydig cells as it has demonstrated positive correlations with FT and LH.

Male Factor Infertility: What Every OB/GYN Should Know.

Male factor infertility plays a role in approximately 30% of infertility cases. Various causes of male factor infertility exist including congenital, acquired, idiopathic, or environmental factors. Identifying the underlying etiology of male factor infertility is a key step toward providing appropriate counseling, effective treatment options, and improving outcomes for couples with infertility. Although the recent advances and developments in assisted reproductive technology have undoubtedly improved fertility outcomes, clinicians must understand the scope of reproductive urologists in the evaluation and treatment of male infertility to provide comprehensive counseling, appropriate referral, comprehensive evaluation, and correct surgical sperm retrieval techniques when needed.

Reproductive outcomes after surgical sperm retrieval in couples with male factor subfertility: a 10-year retrospective national cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To determine any significant differences in the reproductive outcome from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) between cycles using fresh and cryopreserved sperm and between cycles using epididymal and testicular sperm. DESIGN: A retrospective national cohort study using data from the UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, including all ICSI cycles performed in the United Kingdom over a 10-year period. SETTING: Hospital. PATIENT(S): All nondonor ICSI cycles from 2008 to 2017 categorized by sperm source and cryopreservation status. INTERVENTION(S): Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with SSR using fresh or cryopreserved sperm and using ejaculated, testicular, and epididymal sperm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth rate, pregnancy rate, and implantation rate. RESULT(S): We analyzed data from 214,649 ICSI cycles, including 199,818 cycles of ejaculated sperm, 5,646 cycles of epididymal sperm, and 9,185 cycles of testicular sperm. Live births rates per ICSI cycle were 28.5%, 30.6%, and 28.7% for ejaculated, epididymal, and testicular sperm cycles, respectively. Epididymal sperm cycles had a higher live birth rate than that of testicular sperm cycles (odds ratio [OR], 1.067; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.014-1.123). This was despite a higher mean male age (42.5 vs. 40.6 years; 95% CI of difference, 1.81-1.85 years) and female age (34.3 vs. 34.0 years; 95% CI of difference, 0.32-0.34 years) in epididymal cycles than in testicular cycles. Implantation (61.2% vs. 58.0%; OR, 1.086; 95% CI, 1.041-1.133) and clinical pregnancy rates (34.3% vs. 31.3%; OR, 1.085; 95% CI, 1.039-1.132) were also higher in epididymal cycles than in testicular cycles. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between cycles using fresh sperm and those using cryopreserved sperm for SSR-ICSI. CONCLUSION(S): Our study indicates that reproductive outcomes of SSR-ICSI are at least comparable with those of ICSI using ejaculated sperm and does not support the preferential use of fresh sperm over cryopreserved sperm in SSR-ICSI. Births per SSR-ICSI cycle were higher for cycles using epididymal sperm than for cycles using testicular sperm; however, the differences were small, which may provide reassurance to patients undergoing these procedures. The results must be interpreted with caution because multivariable analysis was not possible because of aggregation of data.

The importance of the urologist in male oncology fertility preservation.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) and spermatogonial stem cell retrieval (SSCR) in an oncological context are safe and successful. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in the UK. Patients requiring fertility preservation from December 2017 to January 2020 were included. Data were analysed with Microsoft Excel 2016 and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 20). RESULTS: Among 1264 patients referred to the Reproductive Medical Unit at the University College of London Hospitals for cryopreservation prior to gonadotoxic treatment, 39 chose to go forward with SSR/SSCR because they presented as azoo-/cryptozoospermic or an inability to masturbate/ejaculate. Interventions were testicular sperm extraction (23 patients) or aspiration (one), electroejaculation (one), and testicular wedge biopsy for SSCR (14). The median (range) age was 15.0 (10-65) years and the median testosterone level was 4.4 nmoL/L. Primary diagnoses were sarcoma in 11 patients, leukaemia in nine, lymphoma in eight, testicular tumour in five, other oncological haematological entities in two, other solid cancers in two, while two patients had non-oncological haematological diseases. SSR/SSCR could be offered within 7.5 days on average. Chemotherapy could follow within 2 days from SSR/SSCR, and bone marrow transplant occurred within 19.5 days (all expressed as medians). The success rate for SSR was 68.0% (at least one vial/straw collected). The mean (SD) Johnsen score of testicular biopsies was 5.23 (2.25) with a trend towards positive correlation with SSR success (P = 0.07). However, age, hormonal profile and type of cancer did not predict SSR outcome. CONCLUSION: We show that SSR and SSCR in an oncological context are valid treatment options with a high success rate for patients in which sperm cryopreservation from semen is impossible. By providing an effective pathway, fertility preservation is possible with minimal delay to oncological treatment.

Antibiotic usage in surgical sperm retrievals among IVF centers.

Surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) is currently one of the most common procedures in in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, a gap between the guidelines and routine clinical practice regarding antibiotic use in SSR, which might lead to antibiotic resistance, is a challenging problem worldwide. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from May 1, 2021, to July 15, 2021, to investigate antibiotic usage by medical professionals when performing SSR in IVF centers in Vietnam. The confidential questionnaire comprised 12 items, including characteristics of the study population, awareness of antimicrobial resistance, attitude toward prescribing antibiotics, and current practice of prescribing antibiotics when performing SSR. Surveys were completed by 30 of 45 registered IVF centers (66.7%). Among 67 physicians working at those centers, the age and work-experience years (mean ± standard deviation [s.d.]) were 38.6 ± 6.6 years and 11.2 ± 7.0 years, respectively. Over 60% of them held a degree in Obstetrics and Gynecology, and over four-fifths were men. Most respondents "often/very often/always" raised awareness of antimicrobial resistance to their patients (83.3%), but only half of them "often/occasionally" prescribed antibiotics to patients with SSR in cases where the prescription would be optional. About one-tenth of respondents followed the recommendation from the American Urological Association using "prophylaxis only" for SSR patients. For more invasive SSR, physicians tended to prescribe more complicated and sometimes inappropriate regimens. In conclusion, antibiotic usage in SSR was not always appropriate among IVF centers. Further studies may define specific recommendations for regimens, intervention strategies, and programs to promote appropriate antibiotic use for SSR patients among IVF specialists.

Outcomes of surgical sperm retrieval for non-obstructive azoospermia: A single-center experience

INTRODUCTION@#To evaluate the sperm retrieval rate and factors influencing its success among patients who undergo conventional or microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (TESE) for non-obstructive azoospermia.@*METHODS@#Data were from 223 consecutive patients who underwent conventional or microsurgical TESE from August 2011 to January 2021 under two urologists of the center. Data regarding age, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone, estradiol, testicular size, histopathology, surgical technique, and sperm retrieval were collected. Patients with obstructive azoospermia, repeated TESE procedure, and those who underwent TESE for oncofertility were excluded. Using simple logistic regression analysis, the relationship of the different factors to successful sperm retrieval was computed as odds ratio.@*RESULTS@#The overall surgical sperm retrieval rate was found to be 65.71%. The odds ratio of successful sperm retrieval were 1.04 (95% CI 1.00-1.09) for age, 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97) for FSH, 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99) for LH, 1.24 (95% CI 0.99-1.55) for testosterone, and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) for estradiol. Decreased testicular size was also associated significantly with lower sperm retrieval rate (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.56). Histopathologic pattern and surgical technique were also significantly associated with successful sperm retrieval.@*CONCLUSION@#The surgical sperm retrieval rate in this institution is comparable to the global surgical sperm retrieval rate. Age, FSH, LH, estradiol, testicular size, histopathologic pattern and surgical technique were found to have significant association to successful surgical sperm retrieval.

From disability to fatherhood: Journey of serving soldiers with spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Apart from neurological consequences, most distressing sequels of spinal cord injury (SCI) in men are erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory dysfunction and abnormal semen quality. Of these, ejaculatory dysfunction and poor semen parameters pose the biggest challenge to their biological fatherhood. Penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) and electroejaculation are first-line modalities for anejaculation, and surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) is adopted when other treatments fail. Sperms obtained using these techniques can be used for various fertility treatments for couples with spinal cord injured men. The aim of the study was to study the effectiveness of various modalities of sperm retrieval for assisted reproductive treatment in men with SCI. METHODS: It was a prospective observational study, wherein partners of 12 men with SCI presenting for subfertility underwent assisted reproduction after retrieving sperms via various modalities. The primary outcome was to assess efficacy of PVS in obtaining sperms and of SSR if PVS failed. The secondary outcome was to assess the pregnancy rate in their partners. RESULTS: PVS was successful in obtaining ejaculate in 7 of 12 men, and SSR was fruitful in 4 of 5 men. In vitro fertilization cycle for men who underwent PVS resulted in a pregnancy rate of 57.14% and 75% in couples for men who underwent SSR with an overall pregnancy rate of 58.33%. CONCLUSION: With new cases of SCI occurring primarily in young men at the peak of their reproductive health, it is imperative that medical professionals involved with reproductive health should be aware of the various modalities to help them achieve biological paternity.

Clinical Andrologists: Do We Really Need Them in the Era of ART?

Infertility is on a rise, and so is the availability of assisted reproductive technique (ART) centres. The sole aim of these centers is to help these unfortunate couples achieve pregnancy. Hence, the concentration of the treatment is on the female partner, while the male is relegated to just being a source for sperm. In the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, when pregnancy is possible even with a single mature sperm, evaluation and management of male factor infertility (MFI) is often neglected. MFI and poor semen parameters are markers of male health. He could be suffering from erectile or ejaculatory issues or with correctable obstructive azoospermia. A simple timely varicocele correction may help resolve the issue. It is important to understand that MFI is not a disease but may be a symptom of major underlying clinical condition like testicular or brain tumors. Infertility treatment could be the only occasion when a male seeks health-care evaluation. India has a large pool of qualified urologists trained in andrological care. In contrast, gynecologists may not be trained in the management of male patients, hence there is an important place for andrological services to be an integral part of ART centers. Andrologists would offer minimal andrological evaluation and condition-specific treatment. This could avoid or reduce the need for invasive and expensive ART. Andrologists could also choose the most appropriate mode of sperm retrieval. Undoubtedly, availability of andrological services would improve the overall quality of care, reduce the costs and complications, and would also be medicolegally safe.

Perinatal Outcomes Using Ejaculate versus Surgical Sperm Retrieval in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection for Male Infertility - A Retrospective Analysis of 628 Cycles.

BACKGROUND: Men with azoospermia undergoing a surgical sperm retrieval are anxious about the well-being of the baby. It is therefore important to study the perinatal outcomes in this group compared to the ejaculate sample group. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the perinatal outcomes between ejaculate and surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) groups in couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male factor. STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a university-level infertility unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a retrospective cohort study analysis of 628 assisted reproductive technique (ART) cycles with male factor and combined (male and female) factor infertility over a period of 5 years (January 2011-December 2015). All women who underwent a fresh embryo ART cycle were followed up. The study population included the ejaculate and SSR groups. The perinatal outcomes of these two groups were compared. The congenital anomaly risks among the two groups were also analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 628 ART cycles were included in the current study, of which 478 cycles used ejaculate sperm, while SSR was done in 150 cycles. The analysis was restricted to singletons, and the risk of preterm birth was 22.9% in the ejaculate group, 5.9% in the epididymal group, and 12% in the testicular group (epididymal vs. ejaculate odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-1.66) (testicular vs. ejaculate OR, 0.46; 95% CI: 0.12-1.65). The risk of low birth weight was 23.7% in the ejaculate group, 11.8% in the epididymal group, and 20.0% in the testicular group (epididymal vs. ejaculate OR, 0.42; 95% CI: 0.09-1.9) (testicular vs. ejaculate OR, 0.80; 95% CI: 0.27-2.3). The incidence of congenital anomalies was 7.3% in the ejaculate group, 0 in the epididymal group, and 3.5% in the testicular group (epididymal vs. ejaculate OR, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.01-5.2) (testicular vs. ejaculate OR, 0.63; 95% CI: 0.10-3.7) which was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The current study showed no significant differences in the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in the ejaculate group versus the surgically retrieved sperm groups.

How Successful Is Surgical Sperm Retrieval in Klinefelter Syndrome?

Klinefelter Syndrome (KS) is characterized by the presence of an extra X chromosome. It was first diagnosed in 1942 in a group of azoospermic men. KS is the most common chromosomal abnormality encountered in infertile men and accounts for more than 10% of the causes of azoospermia. Men who are azoospermic may still father children via testicular sperm extraction followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This review article summarizes the success rates of the available techniques for surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) in KS including conventional testicular sperm extraction (cTESE) and micro testicular sperm extraction (mTESE), as well as the risks of these procedures for future fertility. The evidence indicates that the SSR rate is as successful in non-mosaic men with KS as those with normal karyotypes, with retrieval rates of up to 55% reported. The influence of different factors that affect the chances of a successful outcome are discussed. In particular, the impact of aneuploidy rate, physical characteristics, co-morbidities, reproductive endocrine balance and the use of different hormone management therapies are highlighted. Evidence is presented to suggest that the single most significant determinant for successful SSR is the age of the patient. The success of SSR is also influenced by surgical technique and operative time, as well as the skills of the surgeon and embryology team. Rescue mTESE may be used successfully following failed TESE in KS patients in combination with hormone stimulation.

The benefits of varicocele repair for achieving pregnancy in male infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Varicocele is one of the most common treatable causes of male infertility. However, the decision to perform varicocelectomy before starting a fertility program remains controversial. This study aimed to thoroughly review and analyze the benefit of varicocele repair and its impact on the success rate of a fertility program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Wiley Library. The primary outcome was the pregnancy rate, and the secondary outcomes were live birth rate and surgical sperm retrieval success rate. Outcomes were compared between men who underwent treatment for a varicocele and those that did not. The pooled analysis data are presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 31 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the treated group (odds ratio = 1.82; 95% confidence interval: 1.37-2.41; P < 0.0001) along with the live birth rate (odds ratio = 2.80; 95% confidence interval: 1.67-4.72; P = 0.0001). The further subgroup analysis revealed a higher pregnancy rate in treated men with azoospermia, subnormal semen parameters, and normozoospermia (P = 0.04, P = 0.0005, and P = 0.002, respectively), while the live birth rate was only significantly higher in the treated men with subnormal semen parameters and normozoospermia (P = 0.001 and P < 0.0001). Treated varicocele also led to a higher sperm retrieval rate in azoospermic patients (odds ratio = 1.69; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-2.45; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Varicocele repair increased the pregnancy and live birth rates regardless the semen analysis result, along with the sperm retrieval success rate in azoospermic men. Thus, varicocele repair may be beneficial prior to joining a fertility program.

A review of varicocele treatment and fertility outcomes.

Varicoceles are reported to be present in a significant proportion of men presenting with subfertility and are more common amongst this group than in the general population. Opinion still remains divided amongst clinicians managing male factor infertility as to whether varicoceles alter the probability of spontaneous conception and/or pregnancy and live birth rates after fertility treatment. The debate as to whether varicoceles should be treated or not has intensified in recent years. This is due to the concerns regarding the impact of varicoceles on not only conventional semen parameters, but also the potential effects that they may have at the cellular level (an increase in circulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting in sperm DNA fragmentation, even when conventional semen parameters are within the normal reference ranges). It has been suggested that treating the varicocele may result in improvements in the semen parameters, the fertilization and pregnancy rates for both spontaneous pregnancy as well as following in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. ICSI can still be used for Assisted Reproduction Treatment (ART) in the presence of suboptimal semen parameters. However, it is an invasive and expensive technique with potential adverse effects on the offspring. As far as we are aware, there are no randomized controlled trials comparing the clinical/cost effectiveness of varicocele treatment versus the immediate use of ICSI on pregnancy rates. Previous modelling exercises are old and do not take into consideration current practices and trends such as rising female age and time to pregnancy. The conflicting advice that patients sometimes receive, challenges our commitment to evidence-based practice. The only way to resolve the controversy is to undertake an appropriately powered randomized trial, assessing clinical- and cost-effectiveness and the time to pregnancy following varicocele treatment and comparing this to a no treatment group.

Prediction model for clinical pregnancy for ICSI after surgical sperm retrieval in different types of azoospermia.

STUDY QUESTION: Can a counselling tool be developed for couples with different types of azoospermia to predict the probability of clinical pregnancy in ICSI after surgical sperm retrieval? SUMMARY ANSWER: A prediction model for clinical pregnancy in ICSI after surgical sperm retrieval in different types of azoospermia was created and clinical type of azoospermia, testicular size, male FSH, male LH, male testosterone, female age, female antral follicle count (AFC) and female anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) were used as predictors. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Prediction models are used frequently to predict treatment success in reproductive medicine; however, there are few prediction models only for azoospermia couples who intend to conceive through surgical sperm retrieval and ICSI. Furthermore, no specific clinical types of azoospermia have been reported as predictors. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cohort study of 453 couples undergoing ICSI was conducted between 2016 and 2019 in an academic teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Couples undergoing ICSI with surgically retrieved sperm were included, with 302 couples included in the development set and 151 couples included in the validation set. We constructed a prediction model using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The internal validation was based on discrimination and calibration. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We found that for male patients involved in our model, different clinical types of azoospermia are associated with different clinical pregnancy outcomes after ICSI. Considering the clinical type of azoospermia, larger testicular volume and higher levels of FSH, LH and testosterone in the body are associated with higher clinical pregnancy success rates. For women involved in our model, younger age and higher AFC and AMH levels are associated with higher clinical pregnancy success rates. In the development set, the AUC was 0.891 (95% CI 0.849-0.934), indicating that the model had good discrimination. The slope of the calibration plot was 1.020 (95% CI 0.899-1.142) and the intercept of the calibration plot was -0.015 (95% CI -0.112 to 0.082), indicating that the model was well-calibrated. From the validation set, the model had good discriminative capacity (AUC 0.866, 95% CI 0.808-0.924) and calibrated well, with a slope of 1.015 (95% CI 0.790-1.239) and an intercept of -0.014 (95% CI -0.180 to 0.152) in the calibration plot. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We found that BMI was not an effective indicator for predicting clinical pregnancy, which was inconsistent with some other studies. We lacked data about the predictors that reflected sperm characteristics, therefore, we included the clinical type of azoospermia instead as a predictor because it is related to sperm quality. We found that almost all patients did not have regular alcohol consumption, so we did not use alcohol consumption as a possible predictor, because of insufficient data on drinking habits. We acknowledge that our development set might not be a perfect representation of the population, although this is a common limitation that researchers often encounter when developing prediction models. The number of non-obstructive azoospermia patients that we could include in the analysis was limited due to the success rate of surgical sperm retrieval, although this did not affect the establishment and validation of our model. Finally, this prediction model was developed in a single centre. Although our model was validated in an independent dataset from our centre, validation for different clinical populations belonging to other centres is required before it can be exported. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This model enables the differentiation between couples with a low or high chance of reaching a clinical pregnancy through ICSI after surgical sperm retrieval. As such it can provide couples dealing with azoospermia a new approach to help them choose between surgical sperm retrieval with ICSI and the use of donor sperm. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundations of China (81501246 and 81501020 and 81671443). The authors declare no competing interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Fertility management of Klinefelter syndrome.

Introduction: Klinefelter syndrome (KS) represents the most common chromosomal abnormality in the general population, and one of the most common genetic etiologies of nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) and in severe oligospermia. Once considered untreatable, men with KS and NOA now have a variety of treatment options to obtain paternity.Areas covered: The cornerstone of treatment for both KS and NOA patients remains the surgical retrieval of viable sperm, which can be used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection to obtain pregnancy. Although the field has advanced significantly since the early 1990s, approximately half of men with KS will ultimately fail fertility treatments. Presented is a critical review of the available evidence that has attempted to identify predictive factors for successful sperm recovery. To optimize surgical success, a variety of treatment modalities have also been suggested and evaluated, including hormonal manipulation and timing of retrieval.Expert opinion: Individuals with KS have a relatively good prognosis for sperm recovery compared to other men with idiopathic NOA. Surgical success is heavily dependent upon surgical technique and the experience of the andrology/embryology team tasked with the identification and use of testicular sperm.

The obstructive interval predicts pregnancy rates in post-vasectomy patients undergoing ICSI with surgical sperm retrieval.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Are the outcomes of (i) surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) and (ii) intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) influenced by the obstructive interval (time elapsed since vasectomy)? DESIGN: Medical records from 148 patients (194 cycles) with secondary azoospermia due to vasectomy, who presented for percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) and ICSI in a private university-affiliated IVF centre, from January 2012 to February 2017, were analysed in this historical cohort study. The obstructive interval was recorded for each couple, and its influences on the outcomes of SSR and ICSI treatment were investigated using general mixed models with adjustment for potential confounders. Clinical pregnancy rate was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: The obstructive interval was negatively correlated with the presence of spermatozoa (ß = -0.032, P = 0.009) and motile spermatozoa (ß = -0.031, P = 0.010) during PESA. The need to convert to testicular sperm aspiration was significantly influenced by the obstructive interval (ß = 0.012, P = 0.003). The blastocyst development rate on day 5 was inversely correlated with the obstructive interval (ß = -0.011, P = 0.014). Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were negatively influenced by the obstructive interval (ß = -1.107, P = 0.039 and ß = -0.016, P = 0.031, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the obstructive interval has a predictive value on the achievement of clinical pregnancy (area under the curve = 0.667, P = 0.001, Youden index 0.3385, associated criterion >17 years). CONCLUSIONS: Men undertaking vasectomy should be made aware of the long-term effects and their implications for future reproductive treatment.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: preoperative patient optimization, surgical technique, and tissue processing.

Infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia is treatable with the use of testicular sperm extraction and IVF. The optimal approach for sperm retrieval is microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). This systematic review summarizes and evaluates the literature pertaining to patient optimization before mTESE, mTESE technique, and post-mTESE testicular tissue processing. Preoperative patient optimization has been assessed in terms of adjuvant hormone therapy and varicocele repair. Limited data are available for adjuvant medical therapy, and although also limited, data for varicocele repair support increased sperm retrieval, pregnancy, and return of sperm to the ejaculate. Post-mTESE tissue processing has few comparative studies; however, most studies support the combination of mechanical mincing and use of type 4 collagenase for tissue disintegration along with pentoxifylline to assist in identifying motile and viable spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Chromosomal abnormalities in infertile men with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia in Qatar and their association with sperm retrieval intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes.

Objective: To study the types and incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in infertile men with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia in Qatar, and to compare the hormonal changes, testicular sperm retrieval rate, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome between patients with chromosomal abnormalities and patients with idiopathic infertility. Patients and methods: This study involved the retrospective chart review of 625 infertile male patients attending an academic tertiary medical centre in Qatar. Retrieved information included data on medical history, family history, clinical examination, semen analysis, initial hormonal profiles, and genetic studies, ICSI, and sperm retrieval results. Results: The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities was 9.59% (10.6% amongst Qatari patients, 9.04% amongst non-Qataris). About 63.6% of the sample had azoospermia, of whom 10.8% had chromosomal abnormalities. Roughly 36.4% of the sample had oligozoospermia, of whom 7.5% had chromosomal abnormalities. There were no differences between patients with chromosomal abnormalities and those with idiopathic infertility for demographic and infertility features; but for the hormonal profiles, patients with idiopathic infertility had significantly lower luteinising hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone values. For ICSI outcomes, patients with chromosomal abnormalities had a significantly lower total sperm retrieval rate (47.4% vs 65.8%), surgical sperm retrieval rate (41.2% vs 58.1%), and lower clinical pregnancy rate (16.7% vs 26.6%) when compared to the idiopathic infertility group. Conclusion: The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in Qatar as a cause of severe male infertility is within a similar range as their prevalence internationally.