Effectiveness of bedside staplers in bariatric robotic procedures.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the use of laparoscopic staplers in robotic procedures (bedside stapling, BS). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of BS compared with robotic staplers (RS) in bariatric robotic procedures. METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass elective procedures between 1/1/2021 and 12/31/2021 were extracted from PINC AI™ Healthcare Data. The following clinical outcomes were compared: blood transfusion, bleeding, anastomotic leak, intensive care unit (ICU) visit, and 30-day readmission, operating room (OR) time, inpatient costs, and length of stay. We evaluated baseline balance in BS and RS and bivariate association between covariates and outcomes using Chi-square or Fisher exact test and t-test or ANOVA. Multivariable general linear mixed models (GLMMs) with respective gamma or binomial distribution and log-link function were used to obtain adjusted outcomes variations between BS and RS. RESULTS: Total of 7268 discharges were included with 1603 (22.1%) BS and 5665 (77.9%) RS cases. RS cases consisted of a higher number of patients who were Hispanic (17.0% vs. 9.4%), had Medicaid (26.9% vs. 19.4%) and underwent sleeve gastrectomy (68.4% vs. 53.5%). Higher proportions of RS cases were done by providers in Northeast region (35.5% vs. 24.3%), smaller size (< 500 beds; 71.1% vs. 52.3%), and teaching hospitals (59.4% vs. 39%). The adjusted outcomes variations demonstrated that patients that had RS were significantly more likely to have blood transfusions, ICU stays, increased ORT (19 min) and costs ($1273). Sensitivity analysis showed similar results, except no significant differences in blood transfusion rates in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside staplers significantly reduce healthcare resource utilization with equivalent effectiveness and fewer ICU stays compared to robotic staplers.

Intragastric free cancer cells may be attached to automatic staplers during anastomosis in patients with gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Automatic staplers are often used to reconstruct the digestive tract during surgeries for gastric cancer. Intragastric free cancer cells adhering to automatic staplers may come in contact with the laparoscopic port area and progress to port site recurrence. This study aimed to investigate the presence/absence of cancer cells adhering to automatic staplers during gastric cancer surgery using cytological examinations. We further determined the positive predictive clinicopathological factors and clinical implications of free cancer cells attached to automatic staplers. METHODS: This study included 101 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Automatic staplers used for anastomosis in gastric cancer surgeries were shaken in 150 ml of saline solution to collect the attached cells. Papanicolaou stains were performed. We tested the correlation between cancer-cell positivity and clinicopathological factors to identify risk factors arising from the presence of attached cancer cells to the staplers. RESULTS: Based on the cytology, cancer cells were detected in 7 of 101 (6.9%) stapler washing fluid samples. Univariate analysis revealed that circular staplers, type 1 tumors, and positive lymph nodes were significantly associated with higher detection of free cancer cells adhering to staplers. No significant differences in other factors were detected. Of the seven cases with positive cytology, one developed anastomotic recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Exfoliated cancer cells adhered to the automatic staplers used for anastomoses in 6.9% of the staplers used for distal gastrectomies in patients with gastric cancer. Staplers used for gastric cancer surgeries should be handled carefully.

Fact or fiction? Does the position of the end-to-end (EEA) stapler spike matter for colorectal anastomoses using a double-stapled technique?

AIM: Surgeons often have strong opinions about how to perform colorectal anastomoses with little data to support variations in technique. The aim of this study was to determine if location of the end-to-end (EEA) stapler spike relative to the rectal transection line is associated with anastomotic integrity. METHOD: This study was a retrospective analysis of a quality collaborative database at a quaternary centre and regional hospitals. Patients with any left-sided colon resection with double-stapled anastomosis were included (December 2019 to August 2022). Our primary endpoint was a composite outcome including positive air insufflation test, incomplete anastomotic donut, or thin/eccentric donut. Our secondary endpoint was clinical leak. RESULTS: Overall, 633 patients were included and stratified by location of the stapler spike relative to the rectal transection line. Of note, 86 patients had an end-colon to anterior rectum ("reverse Baker") anastomosis with no crossing staple lines. The rates of the composite endpoint based on position of the stapler spike were 12.4% (anterior), 8.1% (through), 12.8% (posterior), 5.1% (corner), and 2.3% for the "reverse Baker" (p = 0.03). The overall rate of clinical leak was 3.8% and there were no differences between methods. In a multivariate analysis, the "reverse Baker" anastomosis was associated with decreased odds of poor anastomotic integrity when compared to anastomoses with crossing staple lines (OR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.87, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: For anastomoses with crossing staple lines, the position of the stapler spike relative to the rectal staple line is not associated with differences in anastomotic integrity. In contrast, anastomoses with no crossing staple lines resulted in significantly lower rates of poor anastomotic integrity, but no difference in clinical leaks.

Comparison of short-term and long-term clinical effects of modified overlap anastomosis and conventional incision-assisted anastomosis in laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: To compare short-term and long-term clinical effects of modified overlap anastomosis and conventional incision-assisted anastomosis for laparoscopic total gastrectomy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with gastric cancer admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January 2016 to March 2020. Quality of life, intraoperative and postoperative conditions were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with the conventional assisted group, the modified overlap group showed a shorter auxiliary incision, milder postoperative pain, shorter time to the first postoperative anal exhaust, shorter time to the first postoperative liquid food intake, and shorter postoperative stay. There were no differences between the two groups regarding operation time, esophagus-jejunum anastomosis time, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes dissected, and length of the upper incision margin. There were no differences between the two groups regarding postoperative early and late complications. There were no differences between the two groups regarding the QLQ-C30 scale three years after the operation. The scores of the QLQ-STO22 scale 3 years after the operation showed significantly lower scores for dysphagia and feeding limit in the modified overlap group than those in the conventional assisted anastomosis group. There was no recurrence in the modified overlap group but one patient in the conventional assisted group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy with modified overlap anastomosis have better minimal invasiveness and faster post-operative recovery than conventional incision-assisted anastomosis.

Endoscopic management of pseudo-lumen stapling following laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Pseudo-lumen stapling can occur following an incidental submucosal introduction of a fork of the linear stapler into the esophageal side during esophagojejunostomy (EJS) after total gastrectomy. This leaves a mucosa-covered layer over the EJS site that can eventually cause an obstruction. If it is noticed intraoperatively, an immediate surgical take-down and repeat anastomosis might be chosen by most surgeons. However, these procedures might have side effects such as further dissection into the esophageal hiatus and unnecessary tension on the anastomosis. To our knowledge, no existing publication has presented a non-surgical management method for pseudo-lumen stapling. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 64-year-old male underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with a pseudo-lumen stapling unnoticed during surgery. Upon its recognition on the third postoperative day, endoscopic release of the tissue covering the anastomosis was performed. The procedure was successful. Gastrographic examination on the sixth postoperative day confirmed a good passage of the contrast agent. Postoperative one-year endoscopic examination confirmed patent anastomosis without stenosis. DISCUSSION: Although pseudo-lumen stapling is one of the most unwanted consequences of EJS using linear staplers, there is little information or documentation available as reference for cases encountered during clinical practice. This might be related to the tendency of surgeons to perform an immediate take-down, followed by repeat EJS when this is noticed during surgery. We were able to successfully overcome this problem without surgery following a series of early gastrographic and endoscopic procedures. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic release of the covering tissue should be considered a valid non-surgical solution to pseudo-lumen stapling.

Pharyngocutaneous Fistula in Salvage Laryngectomy: Use of the Stapler Versus Manual Suturing Technique.

A pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) is the most common complication after salvage total laryngectomy (STL) with an incidence ranging from 5 to 73%, causing an increase in morbidity and delaying the patient's recovery. A surgical technique to prevent PCF formation is the use of the stapler to suture the pharyngeal mucosa.  We have reviewed the medical files of 91 patients who had undergone STL, dividing the patients into two groups (manual suture vs. stapler), based on the type of pharyngeal suture performed during the STL. We found 12/49 (24.5%) cases of a PCF in group A (manual) and 5/42 (11.9%) cases of a PCF in group B (stapler). There is a statistically significant difference between the two groups with the patients in group B presenting better results in terms of the reduction of the surgical time, the length of the hospital stay and also in the restarting of oral feeding. The advantages of mechanical suturing with the stapler are reduced surgical times, a lower PCF formation rate, which involves an early removal of the nasogastric tube, and reduced hospitalization times. Further studies with a larger case series will be necessary to confirm the results obtained and to standardize the surgical technique.

The use of absorbable skin stapler in mastectomy does not increase the rate of surgical site infection.

Purpose: The use of absorbable skin staplers (ASS) for skin closure has been increasing due to their convenience and time-saving effect. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of ASS in reducing skin closure time and its safety regarding surgical site infection (SSI), comparing it to conventional hand sewing (HS) in patients who underwent mastectomy. Methods: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. The electronic medical records of patients who underwent mastectomy between July 2015 and June 2020 in Samsung Medical Center were reviewed. The data included previously known risk factors for SSI. We compared the time expended on skin closure and the occurrence rate of SSI between the ASS group and the HS group. Results: We included 4,311 patients in the analysis. Among them, 520 patients were treated with ASS and 3,791 patients with HS. The average time for skin closure was 16.2 ± 10.1 minutes in the ASS group and 36.5 ± 29.0 minutes in the HS group (P < 0.001). The SSI rate was 0.38% (2 of 520) in the ASS group and 0.36% (14 of 3,791) in the HS group (P > 0.999). Conclusion: The use of ASS in mastectomy reduced the time for skin closure significantly but did not increase the SSI. Therefore, it can be an effective and safe choice to use ASS instead of HS for skin closure in mastectomy.

Partial hepatectomy using linear cutter stapler: are there advantages? / Hepatectomia parcial empregando grampeador linear cortante: há vantagens?

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Morbidity of liver resections is related to intraoperative bleeding and postoperative biliary fistulas. The Endo-GIA stapler (EG) in liver resections is well established, but its cost is high, limiting its use. The linear cutting stapler (LCS) is a lower cost device. AIMS: To report open liver resections, using LCS for transection of the liver parenchyma and en bloc stapling of vessels and bile ducts. METHODS: Ten patients were included in the study. Four patients with severe abdominal pain had benign liver tumors (three adenomas and one focal nodular hyperplasia). Among the remaining six patients, four underwent liver resection for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases, three of which had undergone preoperative chemotherapy. The other two cases were one patient with metastasis from a testicular teratoma and the other with metastasis from a gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor. RESULTS: The average length of stay was five days (range 4-7 days). Of the seven patients who underwent resections of segments II/III, two presented postoperative complications: one developed a seroma and the other a collection of abdominal fluid who underwent percutaneous drainage, antibiotic therapy, and blood transfusion. Furthermore, the three patients who underwent major resections had postoperative complications: two developed anemia and received blood transfusions and one had biloma and underwent percutaneous drainage and antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the linear stapler in hepatectomies was efficient and at lower costs, making it suitable for use whenever EG is not available. The size of the LCS stapler shaft is more suitable for en bloc transection of the left lateral segment of the liver, which is thinner than the right one. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety of LCS for large liver resections and resections of tumors located in the right hepatic lobe.

RESUMO RACIONAL: A morbidade das ressecções hepáticas está relacionada a sangramento intraoperatório e fístulas biliares pós-operatórias. O grampeador Endo-GIA (EG) em ressecções hepáticas está bem estabelecido, mas o seu custo é elevado, limitando seu uso. O grampeador de corte linear (LCS) é um dispositivo com menor custo. OBJETIVOS: Relatar ressecções hepáticas abertas, empregando o LCS para transecção do parênquima hepático e grampeamento em bloco de vasos e ductos biliares. MÉTODOS: Dez pacientes foram incluídos no estudo. Quatro pacientes com dor abdominal importante apresentavam tumores hepáticos benignos (três adenomas e um hiperplasia nodular focal). Dentre os demais seis pacientes, quatro foram submetidos à ressecção hepática para o tratamento de metástases hepáticas colorretais, sendo que três deles haviam sido submetidos à quimioterapia pré-operatória. Os dois outros casos foram um paciente com metástase de teratoma testicular e o outro com metástase de tumor neuroectodérmico gastrointestinal. RESULTADOS: O tempo médio de internação foi de 5 dias (variação=4-7 dias). Dos sete pacientes submetidos a ressecções dos segmentos II/III, dois apresentaram complicações pós-operatórias: um paciente desenvolveu seroma e o outro uma coleção de fluido abdominal submetido a drenagem percutânea, antibioticoterapia e transfusão de sangue. Além disso, os três pacientes submetidos a ressecções maiores tiveram complicações pós-operatórias: dois pacientes desenvolveram anemia e receberam transfusões de sangue e um paciente apresentou biloma e foi submetido a drenagem percutânea e antibioticoterapia. CONCLUSÕES: O emprego do grampeador linear nas hepatectomias foi eficiente e a custos mais baixos, tornando-o adequado para uso sempre que EG não estiver disponível O tamanho da haste do grampeador LCS é mais adequado para a transecção em bloco do segmento lateral esquerdo do fígado, que é mais fino que o direito. Novos estudos são necessários para avaliar a segurança do LCS para grandes ressecções hepáticas e ressecções de tumores localizados no lobo hepático direito.

The impact of gastric pouch size, based on the number of staplers, on the short-term weight outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Introduction: No standard of anatomical variables, including stoma size, limb length, pouch size, and volume, has been determined for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass yet. Herein, we evaluated the effect of two different techniques for creating the gastric pouch on short-term postoperative weight loss. Methods: This retrospective cohort was conducted on patients with a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass history from January 2019 to September 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: in one group, patients' gastric pouch was made using two 60 mm linear staplers, while in the other group, the gastric pouch was made using three 60 mm linear staplers. Anthropometric data, including weight, height, and body mass index (BMI), were measured preoperatively and six months following surgery. Weight outcomes, such as weight loss, a decrease in BMI, excess weight loss (%EWL), and total weight loss (%TWL), were calculated as short-term weight outcomes. Results: Two groups, each containing 50 patients, were included. Patients with smaller pouches (two staplers) had 32.4 ± 9.2 kg weight loss, and those with larger pouches (three staplers) had a 31.42 ± 10.3 kg weight loss. Also, %EWL was 69.7 ± 14.9 and 63.0 ± 20.9, and %TWL was 28.2 ± 6.0 and 26.14 ± 7.5 in patients with two stapler pouches and three stapler pouches, respectively. None of the weight outcome parameters were significantly different between the groups (p-value>0.05). Conclusion: Various studies have been conducted, resulting in different conclusions regarding the effect of the size of the gastric pouch on weight loss. One of the major differences contributing to varying literature studies results is the measurement method used for gastric pouch size. We conclude that using two staplers is not a way to achieve a better result. As the best measurement method has not been defined, studies comparing different methods are suggested; here, the aim was to use a more simple and clinical method regarding this issue.

Retrospective Comparison of Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Non-Donor Patients Undergoing Radical Nephrectomy Using One of Two Different Linear Stapler Technologies for Transection of the Renal Vessels: Fixed-Height Gripping Surface Reloads vs Variable-Height Reloads.

Purpose: To compare outcomes of non-donor patients undergoing radical nephrectomy using fixed-height gripping surface (FHGS) vs variable-height Tri-Staple™ (VHTS) reloads for transection of the renal vessels. Patients and Methods: Using the Premier Healthcare Database of US hospital discharge records, we selected non-donor patients undergoing inpatient radical nephrectomy with dates of admission between 1 October 2015, and 31 December 2020 (first=index admission). The primary outcome was in-hospital hemostasis-related complications (hemorrhage, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, and/or procedure to control bleeding) during the index admission. Secondary outcomes included index admission intraoperative injury, blood transfusion, conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery, total hospital costs, length of stay (LOS), discharge status, and mortality as well as 30-day all-cause inpatient readmission. We used stable balancing weights to balance the FHGS and VHTS groups on numerous patient, procedure, and hospital/provider characteristics, allowing a maximum post-weighting standardized mean difference ≤0.01 for all covariates; we also exactly matched the groups on laterality (right vs left kidney) and intended surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, robotic). We used bivariate multilevel mixed-effects generalized linear models accounting for hospital-level clustering to compare the study outcomes between the FHGS and VHTS groups. Results: After weighting, the FHGS and VHTS groups comprised 2952 and 795 patients, respectively. The observed incidence proportion of the primary outcome of hemostasis-related complications during the index admission was similar between the groups (8.6% for FHGS vs 9.0% for VHTS, difference 0.4% [95% CI -3.2% to 2.5%], P=0.808). Differences between the FHGS and VHTS groups were not statistically significant for any of the secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Endoscopic surgical staplers have become common for transection of the renal vessels during radical nephrectomy, with FHGS and VHTS being the predominant reload types. In this retrospective study of 3747 non-donor patients undergoing radical nephrectomy, use of FHGS vs VHTS reloads was associated with similar clinical and economic outcomes.

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: results, late complications, and degree of satisfaction after 16 years of follow-up / Hemorroidopexia mecânica: resultados, complicações tardias e grau de satisfação após 16 anos de seguimento

ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has been widely used for the treatment of hemorrhoids, but concerns about complications and recurrences after prolonged follow-up are still under debate. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the very long-term results of the stapled hemorrhoidopexy technique. METHODS: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy was performed on 155 patients between 2000 and 2003, and the early results have already been published. In this study, we evaluated the same patients after a very long follow-up. Data were collected with regard to late complications, rate and timing of recurrences, and patients' degree of satisfaction. RESULTS: From a total of 155 patients, 98 patients were evaluated: 59 (60.2%) were interviewed by telephone and 39 (39.8%) were evaluated by outpatient consultation. The mean follow-up was 193 months (range: 184-231), 52 were female, 52 were grade III hemorrhoids, and 46 were grade IV. Recurrence was higher in grade IV (26.1%) than in grade III (7.7%) (p=0.014). Recurrence after prolonged follow-up was seen in 16 patients (16.3%) and 11 (11.2%) required reoperations. The complications were skin tags (3.1%), anal sub-stenosis (2.1%), and fecal incontinence (2.1%). After a prolonged follow-up, 82.5% of patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a safe and effective treatment for hemorrhoidal disease grades III and IV. Recurrence is higher for grade IV hemorrhoids and may occur up to 9 years of follow-up. Reoperations were infrequent and there is a high patient's degree of satisfaction associated with this technique.

RESUMO - RACIONAL: A hemorroidopexia mecênica tem sido amplamente utilizada para o tratamento de hemorroidas, mas as preocupações com complicações e recorrências após seguimento prolongado ainda estão em debate. OBJETIVOS: Nosso objetivo foi avaliar os resultados a muito longo prazo com a técnica hemorroidopexia mecênica. MÉTODOS: O hemorroidopexia mecênica foi realizada em 155 pacientes entre 2000 e 2003, e os primeiros resultados já foram publicados. No presente estudo, avaliamos os mesmos pacientes após um seguimento muito longo. Os dados foram coletados em relação às complicações tardias, taxa e tempo de recorrência e grau de satisfação do paciente. RESULTADOS: De um total de 155 pacientes, 98 pacientes foram avaliados: 59 (60,2%) foram entrevistados por telefone e 39 (39,8%) foram avaliados por consulta ambulatorial. O seguimento médio foi de 193 meses (variação: 184-231), 52 eram do sexo feminino, 52 eram hemorroidas grau III e 46 eram grau IV. A recorrência foi maior no grau IV (26,1%) do que no grau III (7,7%) (p=0,014). A recorrência após seguimento prolongado foi observada em 16 pacientes (16,3%) e 11 (11,2%) necessitaram de reoperações. As complicações foram: plicomas (3,1%), subestenose anal (2,1%) e incontinência fecal (2,1%). Após seguimento prolongado, 82,5% dos pacientes ficaram muito satisfeitos ou satisfeitos com a cirurgia. CONCLUSÕES: O hemorroidopexia mecênica é um tratamento seguro e eficaz para a doença hemorroidária graus III e IV. A recorrência é maior para hemorroidas grau IV e pode ocorrer até 9 anos de seguimento. As reoperações foram infrequentes e há um alto grau de satisfação do paciente associado a esta técnica.

Electrical Impedance Characterization of in Vivo Porcine Tissue Using Machine Learning.

The incorporation of sensors onto the stapling platform has been investigated to overcome the disconnect in our understanding of tissue handling by surgical staplers. The goal of this study was to explore the feasibility of in vivo porcine tissue differentiation using bioimpedance data and machine learning methods. In vivo electrical impedance measurements were obtained in 7 young domestic pigs, using a logarithmic sweep of 50 points over a frequency range of 100 Hz to 1 MHz. Tissues studied included lung, liver, small bowel, colon, and stomach, which was further segmented into fundus, body, and antrum. The data was then parsed through MATLAB's classification learner to identify the best algorithm for tissue type differentiation. The most effective classification scheme was found to be cubic support vector machines with 86.96% accuracy. When fundus, body and antrum were aggregated together as stomach, the accuracy improved to 88.03%. The combination of stomach, small bowel, and colon together as GI tract improved accuracy to 99.79% using fine k nearest neighbors. The results suggest that bioimpedance data can be effectively used to differentiate tissue types in vivo. This study is one of the first that combines in vivo bioimpedance tissue data across multiple tissue types with machine learning methods.

Surgical staplers: definitions and functions / Sebészeti varrógépek: definíciók és fogalomtár

Definition and systemic review of the different surgical staplers are offered in a comprehensive manner. Improved efficacy in tender decisions, better understanding and usage of clear categories are the main targets of the present overview.

Comparação da perda do excesso de peso e complicações pós operatórias entre as técnicas de Gastro-Entero Anastomose Linear e Circular na derivação gástrica em Y-DE-ROUX por via Laparoscópica / Comparison of excess weight loss and postoperative complications between the Laparoscopic Linear and Circular Gastro-Entero Anastomosis techniques in Laparoscopic Y-DE-ROUX gastric bypass

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA: A derivação gástrica em Y-de-Roux laparoscópica (DGYRL) é um procedimento eficaz e bem aceito no tratamento da obesidade mórbida, mas que apresenta complicações como a estenose da gastro-entero anastomose (GEA), fístula, infecção de ferida operatória e falha do grampeamento. Alguns aspectos relacionados com a técnica operatória têm sido descritos na literatura como sendo causa dessas complicações, especialmente da estenose da anastomose gastrojejunal. Este estudo avaliou a eficiência na redução ponderal e a incidência de complicações pós-operatórias a curto e médio prazo, em pacientes submetidos a DGYRL onde a anastomose foi executada com emprego de grampeador linear (AGL) ou grampeador circular (AGC). MÉTODO: Estudo observacional prospectivo realizado entre abril de 2016 e março de 2019. Os dados foram extraídos de um banco de dados que inclui pacientes submetidos a DGRYL executada por um mesmo cirurgião e na mesma instituição. Foram coletados dados referentes a técnica de execução da gastroenteroanastomose, complicações pós-operatórias e perda do excesso de peso corporal em 30, 180 e 360 dias. RESULTADOS: Foram analisados dados de 457 pacientes, sendo 216 pacientes no grupo AGL e 241 no grupo AGC. Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos em relação ao IMC inicial, idade, sexo e comorbidades. O tempo operatório, permanência hospitalar e a perda do excesso de peso corporal durante o período de acompanhamento de 12 meses também foram semelhantes nos dois grupos. Houve quatro casos (1,7%) de estenose na GEA no grupo AGC e somente um caso (0,5%) no grupo AGL, que foram tratados com dilatação endoscópica única bem-sucedida. Ocorreu uma falha do grampeador em ambos grupos: AGC (0,4%) e AGL (0,5%), sendo reparadas com sutura manual intraoperatória e o desenvolvimento de uma fístula (0,4%) somente no grupo AGC, tratado conservadoramente com sucesso. A infecção de ferida operatória foi encontrada em cinco pacientes no grupo AGC (2,1%) e dois pacientes no grupo AGL (0,9%). Não foi encontrado diferença estatística entre os dois grupos em nenhuma variável analisada (p>0,05). CONCLUSÕES: Ambas as técnicas de grampeamento resultaram numa perda do excesso de peso corporal semelhante durante o período de acompanhamento. Apesar do grupo AGL ter apresentando menor número de complicações totais, estas não foram estatisticamente significativas, o que corrobora o fato de que ambas as técnicas são seguras e factíveis, desde que realizadas por um cirurgião com ampla curva de aprendizado em cirurgia bariátrica laparoscópica.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux wellenY gastric bypass (LRYGB) is an effective and accepted procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity but has complications such as stenosis of the gastroenteroanastomosis (GE), GE leak, surgical site infection, and stap ling malfunction. Some aspects related to the surgical technique have been described in the literature as the cause of these complications, especially stenosis of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. This study evaluated the efficiency of weight loss and the in cidence of shortand midterm postoperative complications in patients undergoing LRYGB in which anastomosis was performed using a linear stapler (LSA) or a circular stapler (CSA). METHODS: Prospective observational study conducted between April 2016 and M arch 2019. The data were extracted from a database that includes patients undergoing LRYGB performed by the same surgeon and at the same institution. Data were collected on gastroenteroanastomosis technique, postoperative complications, and excess body wei ght loss at 30, 180, and 360 days. RESULTS: Data from 457 patients were analyzed, of which 216 patients were in the LSA group and 241, in the CSA group. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding initial BMI, age, gender, and comorbid ities. Operative time, hospital stay, and excess body weight loss during the 12 the two groups. There were four cases (month follow 1.7up period were also similar in %) of GE stenosis in the CSA group and only one case (0.5%) in the LSA group, which were t reated with one successful endoscopic dilatation. Stapler malfunction occurred in both groups: LSA (0.5%), CSA (0.4%) and and was repaired with intraoperative manual suture, and a GE leak developed (0.4%) only in the CSA group, which was successfully treat conservatively. Surgical site infection was found in five ed patients in the CSA group (2.1%) and two patients in the LSA group (0.9% ). No statistical difference was found between the two groups in any of the variables analyzed (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both stapling techniques resulted in a similar loss of excess body weight during the follow up period. Although the LSA group had fewer total complications, these were not statistically significant, which substantiates the fact that both techniques are safe and feasible, provided they are performed by a surgeon with a long learning curve in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Comparative Effectiveness Assessment of Two Powered Surgical Stapling Platforms in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Matched Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between the two latest innovations in powered stapling technology, the ECHELON FLEX™ GST system (GST) and the Signia™ Stapling System (SIG), among patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Premier Healthcare Database of US hospital discharge records, we selected patients undergoing inpatient sleeve gastrectomy with dates of surgical admission between March 1, 2017 (SIG launch), and December 31, 2018. Outcomes measured during the surgical admission included in-hospital hemostasis-related complications (bleeding/transfusion; primary outcome), leak, total hospital costs, length of stay (LOS), and operating room time; 30-, 60-, and 90-day all-cause inpatient readmissions were also examined. We used 1:1 cardinality matching to balance the GST and SIG groups on numerous patient and hospital/provider characteristics, allowing a maximum standardized mean difference (SMD) ≤0.05 for all matching covariates. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) accounting for hospital-level clustering were used to compare the study outcomes between the GST and SIG groups. RESULTS: Of the 5573 identified cases, there were 491 patients in each group (982 total) after matching. The observed incidence proportion of hemostasis-related complications during the surgical admission was lower in the GST group as compared with the SIG group (3 events/491 [0.61%] vs 11 events/491 [2.24%]; odds ratio [SIG=reference] = 0.28, 95% CI=0.13-0.60, P=0.0012). Differences between the GST and SIG groups were not statistically significant for leak, total hospital costs, LOS, OR time, and all-cause inpatient readmission at 30, 60, and 90 days. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of 982 matched patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy, the ECHELON FLEX™ GST system was associated with a lower rate of hemostasis-related complications as compared with the Signia™ Stapling System. Further controlled prospective studies are needed to confirm the validity of this finding.

Compression injury of the circular stapler for gastrointestinal end-to-end anastomosis: preliminary in-vitro study.

PURPOSE: This preliminary in-vitro study was designed to evaluate the risk factors of compression injury from use of a circular stapler for end-to-end anastomosis. METHODS: Transparent collagen plates were prepared in dry and wet conditions. Physical properties of collagen plates and porcine colon tissue were examined using a rheometer. Adjustable and fixed-type circular staplers were applied on the collagen plates and the gap distance and compressive pressure were measured during anvil approximation. Tissue injury was evaluated using a compression injury scale. Compression properties were accessed to optimal or overcompression based on gap distance. RESULTS: Unacceptable injuries were rarely observed on the dry collagens, regardless of compression device. In the adjustable compression, the compressibility ratio was similar between dry and wet collagen. Overcompression and unacceptable injury increased on the wet collagens. In the fixed compression, the compressibility ratio increased significantly and unacceptable injuries were observed in more than 50% of wet collagens. Peak pressure was significantly higher in the fixed-compression types than those of adjustable type. On bivariate correlation analysis, fixed-compression type and wet collagens were respectively associated with overcompression. On multivariate analysis, edematous collagen condition was the most important risk factor and proximal anvil side, fixed compression type, and overcompression were also independent risk factors for unacceptable compression injury. CONCLUSION: In the edematous tissue condition, unintentional overcompression could be increased and result in tissue injury on the compression line of the circular stapler.

A novel reaction force-fluorescence measurement system for evaluating pancreatic juice leakage from an excised swine pancreas during distal pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Resection using a stapler is a popular approach to distal pancreatectomy. However, the resulting leakage of pancreatic juice represents a serious problem. We have developed a force-fluorescence measurement as a first step towards the quantitative evaluation of pancreatic leakage due to tissue tearing under compression. METHODS: The system comprises a testing machine with an indenter, similar in size to a stapler, which controls compression speed and measures reaction force, and a fluorescence measurement system to measure pancreatic juice leakage. Pancreatic juice leakage is measured as the maximum value of the increasing rate of fluorescence intensity (max value). Ten excised swine pancreases were compressed at a speed of 500, 100, and 10 mm/min until their thicknesses became 2 mm. RESULTS: A strong positive correlation (0.804) was observed between the increase in max value before and after compression and the amount of reaction force drop due to tissue destruction. No pancreatic juice leakage was observed when compressed slowly (10 mm/min). CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully developed a novel force-fluorescence measurement system that can detect and quantify pancreatic juice leakage caused by tissue tearing. This system can determine the optimal compression conditions for preventing pancreatic juice leakage.

[Application of Endo-GIA stapler in laparoscopic radicalcystectomy].

Objective: To explore the application of Endo-GIA stapler in laparoscopic radical cystectomy, especially in the treatment of lateral bladder ligament, and to evaluate its clinical feasibility and practicability. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical data about 38 cases of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) treated in the Department of Urology, Chaoyang Hospital of Beijing and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from July 2017 to June 2019 were conducted. The patients were divided into Endo-GIA stopler group(18 cases) and non-Endo-GIA stopler group (20 cases) according to whether Endo-GIA stapler were used. The basic clinical data, operation time of bladder lateral ligament, operation time of bladder lateral wall, operation time of bladder resection, amount of bleeding during operation, pathological data after operation and related indicators of recovery after operation were compared between the two groups. Results: All 38 patients underwent radical cystectomy (RC) successfully under 3-D laparoscopy without conversion to open surgery. The operation time of bladder lateral ligament in Endo-GIA stapler group was significantly shorter than that in non-Endo-GIA stapler group [(3.25±0.75) min vs (9.20±2.95) min, P=0.042]; the operation time of bladder lateral wall in Endo-GIA stapler group was significantly shorter than that in non-Endo-GIA stapler group [(8.06±1.66) min vs (14.30±3.37) min, P=0.016]. The operation time of cystectomy in the Endo-GIA stapler group was significantly shorter than that in the non-Endo-GIA stapler group [(47.06±4.70) min vs (61.60±14.91) min,P=0.003]. The amount of bleeding in the Endo-GIA stapler group was significantly shorter than that in the non-Endo-GIA stapler group [(37.77±21.30) ml vs (114.50±39.80) ml, P=0.015]. The time of drainage tube removal in Endo-GIA group was significantly shorter than that in the non-Endo-GIA group [(5.83±1.54) d vs (7.30±3.00) d, P=0.002]. The length of post-hospitalization in Endo-GIA group was significantly shorter than that in the non-Endo-GIA group [(7.67±1.78) d vs (9.60±3.25) d,P=0.036]. However, there was no significant difference in other basic clinical data, post-operative pathology and post-operative recovery related indicators. Conclusions: Laparoscopic radical cystectomy using Endo-GIA stapler device is safe and feasible. It is easy to operate, shorten the operation time significantly, and reduce the amount of bleeding. To a certain extent, it is conducive to the recovery of patients after operation to some extent, and worthy of clinical application.

Clinical and economic benefits associated with the use of powered and tissue-specific endoscopic staplers among the patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Background: Thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer is a complex procedure where endoscopic staplers play a critical role in transecting the lung parenchyme, vasculature, and bronchus. This retrospective study was performed to investigate the economic benefits of powered and tissue-specific endoscopic staplers such as gripping surface technology (GST) and powered vascular stapler (PVS) compared to standard staplers.Methods: Two hundred and seventy-five patients who received a thoracoscopic lobectomy between 2008 and 2016 were included. Group 1 (n = 117) consisted of patients who received the operation with manual endoscopic staplers, whereas Group 2 (n = 158) consisted of patients who received the operation with GST and PVS.Results: Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were comparable, except smoking history, pulmonary function, and pleural adhesion. All patients received the operation successfully without mortalities and broncho-pleural fistula. Operation time and blood loss were higher in Group 1. Pleurodesis was performed less in Group 2 than in Group 1 (18.0% vs 3.8%, p < 0.0001). Group 2 had statistically significant lower adjusted hospital costs (Korean Won, 14,610,162 ± 4,386,628 vs 12,876,111 ± 5,010,878, p < 0.0001), lower adjusted hemostasis related costs (198,996 ± 110,253 vs 175,291 ± 191,003, p = 0.0101); lower cartridge related adjusted costs (1,105,091 ± 489,838 vs 839,011 ± 307,894, p < 0.0001) compared to Group 1. As well, Group 2 showed ∼12% lower adjusted total hospital costs compared to Group 1. Multivariable analysis revealed that Group 1 was related to increased hospital costs.Conclusions: This study showed that thoracoscopic lobectomy with powered and tissue-specific endoscopic staplers were associated with better clinical outcomes and reduced adjusted hospital costs when compared in Korean real-world settings.

Systematic review of operative outcomes of robotic surgical procedures performed with endoscopic linear staplers or robotic staplers.

A comprehensive review of operative outcomes of robotic surgical procedures performed with the da Vinci robotic system using either endoscopic linear staplers (ELS) or robotic staplers is not available in the published literature. We conducted a literature search to identify publications of robotic surgical procedures in all specialties performed with either ELS or robotic staplers. Twenty-nine manuscripts and six abstracts with relevant information on operative outcomes published from January 2011 to September 2017 were identified. Given the relatively recent market release of robotic staplers in 2014, comparative perioperative clinical outcomes data on the performance of ELS vs. robotic staplers in robotic surgery is very sparse in the published literature. Only three comparative studies of surgeries with the da Vinci robotic system plus ELS vs. da Vinci plus robotic staplers were identified; two in robotic colorectal surgery and the other in robotic gastric bypass surgery. These comparative studies illustrate some nuances in device design and usability, which may impact outcomes and cost, and therefore may be important to consider when selecting the appropriate stapling technologies/technique for different robotic surgeries. Comparative perioperative data on the use of ELS vs. robotic staplers in robotic surgery is scarce (three studies), and current literature identifies both types of devices as safe and effective. Given the longer clinical history of ELS and its relatively more robust evidence base, there may be trade-offs to consider before switching to robotic staplers in certain robotic procedures. However, this literature review may serve as an initial reference for future research.