ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: About 10% of breast cancer (BC) is diagnosed in stage IV. This study sought to identify factors associated with time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in a cohort of patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC), from a single cancer center in Colombia, given that information on this aspect is limited. METHODOLOGY: An observational, analytical, and retrospective cohort study was carried out. Time to progression and OS rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier survival functions. Cox models were developed to assess association between time to progression and time to death, using a group of fixed variables. RESULTS: Overall, 175 patients were included in the study; 33.7% of patients had luminal B HER2-negative tumors, 49.7% had bone involvement, and 83.4% had multiple metastatic sites. Tumor biology and primary tumor surgery were the variables associated with TTP and OS. Patients with luminal A tumors had the lowest progression and mortality rates (10 per 100 patients/year (95% CI: 5.0-20.0) and 12.6 per 100 patients/year (95% CI: 6.9-22.7), respectively), and patients with triple-negative tumors had the highest progression and mortality rates (40 per 100 patients/year (95% CI: 23.2-68.8) and 44.1 per 100 patients/year (95% CI: 28.1-69.1), respectively). Across the cohort, the median TTP was 2.1 years (95% CI: 1.6; the upper limit cannot be reached) and the median OS was 2.4 years (95% CI: 2-4.3). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, patients with luminal A tumors and those who underwent tumor surgery given that they presented clinical benefit (CB) after initial systemic treatment, had the lowest progression and mortality rates. Overall, OS was inferior to other series due to high tumor burden and difficulties in accessing and continuing oncological treatments.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , Colombia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common tumors worldwide. Most cases occur in patients with chronic liver disease who are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and their prognosis is poor. Because HCC is resistant to conventional systemic therapies, molecular therapies have emerged and been established as the standard for advanced forms of the disease. Since the publication of phase III clinical studies on sorafenib, research has searched for new molecular targets. Thus, multiple clinical studies that inhibit relevant molecular pathways have been performed with numerous patients. Many of these trials have had unexpectedly negative results, not only due to patient complexity and the difficulty in evaluating a therapeutic response, quality of life and the survival rate but also because phase II clinical studies, without the selection of molecular targets, have continued on to poor results in phase III studies. This review article aims to evaluate different phase II and phase III clinical studies to understand the clinically relevant molecular pathways and to improve the future management of HCC patients.
El carcinoma hepatocelular (CHC) es uno de los tumores más comunes a nivel mundial. La mayoría de los casos ocurre en pacientes con enfermedad hepática crónica, quienes son diagnosticados en un estado avanzado con muy pobre pronóstico. Terapias moleculares orientadas al tratamiento del CHC han sido destacadas; estas pueden afectar la proliferación celular del tumor, diferenciación celular, angiogénesis, invasión y metástasis, entre otros procesos críticos al desarrollo del tumor. El estándar para el CHC avanzado es la terapia target usando Sorafenib, sin embargo, nuevas moléculas han sido testeadas en estudios fase III de primera línea, tales como sunitinib, brivanib, erlotinib y linifanib, sin superioridad sobre sorafenib. La investigación de nuevos tratamientos es un desafío para investigadores, hepatólogos y oncólogos. Las principales vías moleculares de CHC con relevancia en estudios clínicos fase II y III son: MAP-kinase (MAPK), PI3K/AKT/mTOR, (HGF)/c-Met, cromatina y regulación epigenética, mantenimiento de telómeros, Notch, Hedgehog, Hippo y vía señalizante Jak/STAT. Las terapias futuras en CHC pueden ser orientadas rutinariamente usando sólo objetivos adecuados para terapias moleculares y seleccionando subgrupos de pacientes sobre la base de la expresión de targets moleculares o basados en nuevas clasificaciones definidas por estudios genómicos.