Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 168
Filter
1.
Neurol Ther ; 2024 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39093539

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease that leads to impaired cognitive function and accumulation of disability, with significant socioeconomic burden. Serious unmet need in the context of managing MS has given rise to ongoing research efforts, leading to the launch of new drugs planned for the near future, and subsequent concerns about the sustainability of healthcare systems. This study assessed the changes in the Italian MS market and their impact on the expenditures of the Italian National Healthcare Service between 2023 and 2028. METHODS: A horizon-scanning model was developed to estimate annual expenditure from 2023 to 2028. Annual expenditure for MS was calculated by combining the number of patients treated with each product (clinical inputs) and the yearly costs of therapy (economic inputs). Baseline inputs (2020-2022) were collected from IQVIA® real-world data, while input estimation for the 5-year forecast was integrated with analog analyses and the insights of clinicians and former payers. RESULTS: The number of equivalent patients treated in 2028 in Italy was estimated at around 67,000, with an increase of 10% versus 2022. In terms of treatment pattern evolution, first-line treatments are expected to reduce their shares from 47% in 2022 to 27% in 2028, and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors are expected to reach 23% of patient shares. Overall, expenditure for MS is estimated to decrease from €721 million in 2022 to €551 million in 2028, mainly due to losses of exclusivity and renegotiation of drug prices. CONCLUSION: Despite the increase in the number of patients treated for MS and the launch of new molecules that will reach high market penetration, the model confirmed sustainability for the Italian National Healthcare Service.

2.
SAGE Open Med ; 12: 20503121241271817, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39165864

ABSTRACT

Background: Biological agents have revolutionized care in specialties such as oncology, immunology, infectious diseases, and genetic disorders, offering targeted actions on specific molecules or select immune cells. Monoclonal antibodies, known for their high specificity and precision, represent one of the most significant and rapidly expanding categories of these agents. Understanding the drug utilization patterns of monoclonal antibodies is crucial to ensure their optimal use, especially given their high cost and potential adverse effects. Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in a secondary hospital in the United Arab Emirates. Patients of either gender receiving monoclonal antibodies at the study site were included. Treatment patterns, utilization, and factors associated with the discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies were assessed. Results: Hyperlipidemia (136, 39.1%) was the most common indication for monoclonal antibodies, followed by prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in congenital heart disease (104, 29.9%) and osteoporosis (42, 12.1%). Evolocumab was the most commonly prescribed monoclonal antibody (135, 38.8%), followed by palivizumab (104, 29.9%), and dupilumab (38, 10.9%). The majority of monoclonal antibodies demonstrated a prescribed daily dose to defined daily dose ratio of 1.0, reflecting their appropriate utilization. One hundred twenty-nine patients (37.0%) discontinued their treatment during the study. Patient's level of education (OR: 0.416, 95% CI: 0.183-0.943, p = 0.036), BMI (OR: 2.358, 95% CI: 1.164-4.777, p = 0.017), number of concomitant medications (OR: 2.457, 95% CI: 1.202-5.025, p = 0.014), and treatment duration (OR: 9.180, 95% CI: 4.909-17.165, p < 0.001) were identified as predictors of discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies. Conclusion: This study represents the first comprehensive investigation in the United Arab Emirates focused on treatment patterns, utilization, and discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies among the local population. Monoclonal antibodies were prescribed for the management of a wide range of clinical conditions. The study reports appropriate utilization of most monoclonal antibodies and identifies factors such as patient education level, BMI, concomitant medications, and treatment duration as independent predictors of monoclonal antibody treatment discontinuation.

3.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 915, 2024 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080554

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This investigation aims to elucidate the treatment status of advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients in Hunan Province of Central Southern China from November 2021 to December 2022. METHODS: Data from 301 patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer were collected from the breast cancer investigation project in Hunan under the guidance of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncolfogy (CSCO). The data included the clinical characteristics of patients and the status of first-line and second-line rescue treatment. RESULTS: First-line chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for mBC accounted for 40% (121/301) and 60% (180/301) of treatments, respectively. AI (21%), AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (28%), and fulvestrant (24%) or fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (18%) were the most common first-line endocrine therapies. Taxane-based chemotherapy was the most common first-line chemotherapy (59%). Second-line chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for mBC accounted for 43% (72/166) and 57% (94/166) of treatments, respectively. Fulvestrant (23%) or fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (29%) were the most common second-line endocrine therapies. The prevalences of AI and AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor decreased to 19% and 11%, respectively. T (taxane)-based chemotherapy was still the most common chemotherapy regimen (46%). Third-line chemotherapy was more prevalent than endocrine therapy (57% vs. 41%). T (taxane)-based chemotherapy was still the most common chemotherapy regimen (46%). Fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor was the most common endocrine therapy (33%). AI, AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor, and fulvestrant accounted for 21%, 12% and 18% of third-line endocrine therapies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to chemotherapy, endocrine therapy was a more favorable choice for first-line and second-line treatment for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients in Hunan Province.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Breast Neoplasms , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Receptors, Estrogen , Receptors, Progesterone , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , China/epidemiology , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Aged , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
4.
Leuk Res Rep ; 21: 100453, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39035747

ABSTRACT

Real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy are lacking before the advent of precision medicine in this setting. Herein, we present the Italian sub-analysis of the CURRENT study in AML patients unfit for first line intensive chemotherapy, evaluating patients' outcomes between 2015 and 2018. Among 74 evaluable patients, 62 received systemic treatments (most used therapy was hypomethylating agents), while 12 best supportive care. Key results include both efficacy and safety data, as well as HCRU and treatment patterns. In first-line therapy cohort median OS was 13.4 months vs. 2.7 months for BSC.

5.
Ann Hematol ; 103(8): 2969-2981, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib is a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the first-line treatment and relapse of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This study aimed to describe the characteristics of CLL patients treated with ibrutinib and its effectiveness, safety, and treatment pattern in real life. METHODS: All patients covered by the general health scheme (approximately 80% of the French population) with a first ibrutinib dispensation from August 1, 2017 (date of reimbursement in France) to December 31, 2020, were identified in the French National Health Insurance database (SNDS). An algorithm was developed to identify the disease (CLL, MCL or WM) for which ibrutinib was prescribed. This article focused on CLL patients. The time to next treatment (TTNT) was plotted using Kaplan‒Meier curves. RESULTS: During this period, 6,083 patients initiated ibrutinib, among whom 2,771 (45.6%) patients had CLL (mean age of 74 years; 61% of men). At ibrutinib initiation, 46.6% of patients had a cardiovascular comorbidity. Most patients (91.7%) were not hospitalized during the exposure period for one of the cardiovascular or bleeding events studied. Hospitalizations were more frequent in patients with a cardiovascular comorbidity (5.9% versus 11.0%, p-value < 0.0001) and aged over 70 (5.9% versus 9.4%, p-value < 0.0001). The median TTNT was not reached. CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest cohorts of ibrutinib-treated patients in the world. The profile of CLL patients treated with ibrutinib was in accordance with the marketing authorization and reimbursement. This study confirmed effectiveness and safety data.


Subject(s)
Adenine , Databases, Factual , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Piperidines , Humans , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Adenine/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Male , Aged , Female , Piperidines/therapeutic use , France/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use
6.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 1003-1010, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042111

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent, chronic disorder. Auvelity (dextromethorphan-bupropion) is a novel, oral N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist and sigma-1 receptor agonist approved (August 2022) by the FDA for treating MDD in adults. This is the first analysis on real-world Auvelity usage in the United States. METHODS: Adult patients initiating Auvelity in the Symphony IDV databases by September 2023 were identified (index date: the first Auvelity claim). Patients had continuous eligibility over the 12-month pre-index period and ≥1 MDD diagnosis (ICD-10-CM codes: F32.*, F33.*) over the 5-year pre-index period. Demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, prior MDD-related medications, and Auvelity initiation status were assessed. RESULTS: This analysis included 22,288 patients with MDD treated with Auvelity (mean age 45.1 years; 68.1% women); 40.0% lived in the South and 58.5% had commercial insurance. Comorbidities included mental health disorders (53.5%; 47.6% had anxiety disorders). Overall, 83.7% of the patients had received treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; 54.9%), the norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NDRI [bupropion]; 40.4%), and/or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs; 35.9%) over the 12-month pre-index period. The last MDD-related treatment prior to Auvelity comprised SSRI (22.4%), SNRI (13.2%), and NDRI (12.8%) monotherapies; 294 (1.3%) patients received esketamine. In total, 6,418 (28.8%) patients initiated Auvelity as monotherapy vs 15,870 (71.2%) as an add-on; Auvelity was most frequently added to an SSRI alone (10.7%) or SNRI alone (6.5%). A total of 2,254 (10.1%) patients initiated Auvelity without prior treatment in the 12-month pre-index period. LIMITATIONS: Incomplete data due to reporting; diagnoses captured subject to coding error; and limited generalizability to other populations. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large demographically distributed claims database, 22,288 patients with MDD initiated Auvelity within a year of its approval; 10.1% were treatment-naïve and 28.8% initiated Auvelity as monotherapy. Most patients had mental health-related comorbidities and attempted various MDD-related treatments prior to Auvelity.


Major depressive disorder (medical terminology for "depression") is a common medical condition that makes people feel persistently sad or hopeless, affecting their ability to handle daily activities. Effective treatment, which may include medication, is crucial for improving their quality of life. This study explores how people in the United States use a new medication called Auvelity to treat depression. Researchers reviewed the medical records of over 22,000 adults with depression, looking at their age, gender, location, type of health insurance, other health conditions, and use of other depression medications. The study focused on people who started using Auvelity in the first year after its Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. On average, Auvelity users were 45 years old. They lived across various regions of the US, had different types of health insurance, and over two-thirds were women. Many Auvelity users had other mental health disorders, including anxiety. Most had tried different types of medications for depression in the previous year, while about 10% had not used any other depression medicines in the previous year. When starting Auvelity, almost one-third of patients used it as their only depression medicine. Over two-thirds of patients started Auvelity alongside another depression medicine. Initial Auvelity prescriptions were issued by a diverse range of medical professionals, including psychiatrists, primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These findings provide valuable insights into how this new medicine is used in real life and can inform treatment decisions of healthcare providers who help manage depression in their patients.


Subject(s)
Bupropion , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder, Major , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , United States , Bupropion/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Insurance Claim Review , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult , Aged
7.
Hematology ; 29(1): 2365096, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958506

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is rapidly evolving in Taiwan. The present study aimed to assess the treatment patterns among RRMM patients in Taiwan. METHODS: This retrospective, chart review-based, non-interventional study collected data on RRMM patients (≥20 years old) receiving pomalidomide-based treatment between January 2017 and December 2020 across five sites in Taiwan. RESULTS: Median age of the study population was 65.6 years. Approximately 75% patients received a doublet regimen and 25% were on a triplet regimen. Disease progression was the most common cause for switching to pomalidomide-based treatments in doublet (71.2%) and triplet (58.3%) groups. Patients in doublet and triplet groups (>80%) received 4 mg pomalidomide as a starting dose. Overall response rate (ORR: 31.5% and 45.8%) and median progression-free survival (PFS: 4.7 and 6.8 months) were reported in the doublet and triplet regimen. Doublet regimen was discontinued mainly due to disease progression or death (78.1%); however, triplet regimen patients mainly terminated their treatment due to reimbursement limitations (29.2%). Healthcare resource utilization (HRU) was comparable between doublet and triplet groups. CONCLUSION: In Taiwan, half of RRMM patients received pomalidomide-based triplet regimens. Triplet regimens showed a trend towards better outcomes with longer PFS and higher response rates compared to doublets. Notably, the duration of triplet use is influenced by reimbursement limitations. This study provides insight into RRMM treatment patterns in Taiwan and the findings suggest that triplet regimens may be a better alternative than doublet regimens.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Thalidomide , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Thalidomide/therapeutic use , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Aged , Female , Male , Taiwan , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Recurrence
8.
Ther Adv Neurol Disord ; 17: 17562864241252722, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38808094

ABSTRACT

Background: Teriflunomide is a once-daily oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Only limited information is available about its real-world use and changes over time. Objectives: To collect real-world data on teriflunomide use in clinical routine (and comparison to the previously conducted study TAURUS-MS). Design: National, open, non-interventional, prospective, multicenter study. Methods: TAURUS-MS II was conducted at 220 German sites between July 2017 and March 2022, including RRMS patients treated with teriflunomide. Data on patient demographics, MS history, previous treatment, therapy satisfaction, and safety were collected. Results: In total, 752 patients were included (65% female) with a mean age (±standard deviation) of 43 ± 11 years. Sixty-six percent had DMT before, and 46% had discontinued their last pretreatment ≤6 months prior to study entry. Among the latter, previous DMTs were interferon (21%), glatiramer acetate (11%), and dimethyl fumarate (9%), and reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; 55%) and insufficient efficacy (16%). Over 24 months, the mean treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication scores improved by 6 ± 29 points on effectiveness, 8 ± 20 on convenience, and 12 ± 25 on global satisfaction. The mean number of MS relapses decreased from 0.81 ± 0.81 in the 24 months prior to 0.27 ± 0.57 within 24 months after study entry. Non-serious AEs occurred in 423 patients (56%) and serious AEs in 49 patients (7%). Most reported AEs were alanine aminotransferase increase (11%), hypertension (8%), and alopecia (7%). Compared to TAURUS-MS, patients in TAURUS-MS II were younger, had a higher employment rate, and a higher share of treatment-naïve patients. Conclusion: Mean number of relapses was significantly reduced. Patient satisfaction was significantly improved compared to previous DMT. Tolerability was comparable to previous trials. Trial registration: Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte public database for non-interventional studies, number 7138.

9.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 206(1): 91-103, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704772

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluated treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in real-world clinical settings in Japan. METHODS: The treatment patterns, time to next treatment or death (TTNTD), time to treatment discontinuation, adverse events of interest, and medical costs of treating patients with mTNBC in first-, second-, and third-line settings were investigated using data of patients meeting the inclusion criteria between January 2017 and March 2022 in a Japanese medical claims database. The treatment regimens for mTNBC were defined according to the Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines. RESULTS: In this study, 2236 patients with mTNBC (median age 66.0 years; 99.8% female) were included in the first-line cohort. Of these, 46.6% and 20.8% were included in the second- and third-line cohorts, respectively. The two most frequently used treatments were capecitabine (19.1%) and S-1 (tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil) (14.5%) in the first-line cohort, eribulin (18.3%) and bevacizumab/paclitaxel (14.4%) in the second-line cohort, and eribulin (19.4%) and bevacizumab/paclitaxel (17.5%) in the third-line cohort. The TTNTD shortened as the line of therapy progressed (median 8.0, 6.5, and 5.2 months for the first-, second-, and third-line treatments, respectively). Nausea/vomiting and neutropenia/leukopenia occurred in 62.8% and 18.3% of all patients, respectively. The medical total costs per day were 6.7, 10.2, and 12.9 thousand yen during the first-/second-/third-line treatments, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into current treatment patterns for mTNBC in Japan. The cost-benefit balance worsens with later-line treatment and a high unmet need for mTNBC drug treatment remains.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Databases, Factual , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Japan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Neoplasm Metastasis , Retrospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Data Analysis , East Asian People
11.
Chin J Integr Med ; 30(6): 489-498, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801641

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the treatment patterns and survival status of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in China in the past two decades, and objectively evaluate the impact of standardized Chinese medicine (CM) treatment on the survival of AGC patients. METHODS: This multicenter registry designed and propensity score analysis study described the diagnosis characteristics, treatment-pattern development and survival status of AGC from 10 hospitals in China between January 1, 2000 and July 31, 2021. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated between non-CM cohort (standard medical treatment) and CM cohort (integrated standard CM treatment ≥3 months). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to adjust any difference in average outcomes for bias. RESULTS: A total of 2,001 patients histologically confirmed locally advanced and/or metastasis stomach and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Among them, 1,607 received systemic chemotherapy, 215 (10.74%) accepted molecular targeted therapy, 44 (2.2%) received checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and 769 (38.43%) received CM. Two-drug regimen was the main choice for first-line treatment, with fluoropyrimidine plus platinum as the most common regimen (530 cases, 60.09%). While 45.71% (16 cases) of patients with HER2 amplification received trastuzumab in first-line. The application of apatinib increased (33.33%) in third-line. The application of checkpoint inhibitors has increased since 2020. COX analysis showed that Lauren mixed type (P=0.017), cycles of first-line treatment >6 (P=0.000), CM (P=0.000), palliative gastrectomy (P=0.000), trastuzumab (P=0.011), and apatinib (P=0.008) were independent prognostic factors for the OS of AGC. After PSM and IPTW, the median OS of CM cohort and non-CM cohort was 18.17 and 12.45 months, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world practice for AGC in China, therapy choices consisted with guidelines. Two-drug regimen was the main first-line choice. Standardized CM treatment was an independent prognostic factor and could prolong the OS of Chinese patients with AGC. (Registration No. NCT02781285).


Subject(s)
Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Survival Analysis , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/methods , Aged , China/epidemiology , Propensity Score , Adult
12.
Future Oncol ; 20(19): 1351-1366, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647011

ABSTRACT

Aim: This study assessed real-world treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in Germany. Materials & methods: Patients diagnosed with mUC from 2015 to 2019 were identified in two claims databases: AOK PLUS and GWQ. Results: 3226 patients with mUC were analyzed; 1286 (39.9%) received systemic treatment within 12 months of diagnosis (platinum-based chemotherapy: 64.2%). Factors associated with receiving treatment were: younger age, male sex, less comorbidity and recent diagnosis. In AOK PLUS and GWQ populations, unadjusted median overall survival (interquartile range) from diagnosis in treated patients was 13.7 (6.8-32.9) and 13.8 (7.1-41.7) months, and in untreated patients was 3.0 (1.2-10.8) and 3.6 (1.2-18.8) months, respectively. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with mUC in Germany receive no systemic treatment.


What is this article about? This article reports the results from a study in Germany between 2015 and 2019 that investigated how advanced bladder cancer that has spread to other organs was treated and how long people lived after diagnosis. The study looked at systemic therapies, which means treatments that affect the entire body.What were the results? Only 40% of people diagnosed with advanced bladder cancer received systemic treatment within the first 12 months. Of those who did receive systemic treatment, the majority received combination therapy that included a chemotherapy drug containing platinum (64%). Systemic treatment was more likely to be given to people who were younger, less sick, male, or more recently diagnosed. After 12 months, 56% of treated people were still alive, compared with 26% of people without treatment. On average, people who received systemic treatment lived for about 14 months, while people without systemic treatment lived for only 3 to 4 months.What do the results of the study mean? Many people with advanced bladder cancer in Germany do not receive systemic treatment. People who receive treatment are likely to live longer than those who do not receive treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/secondary , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Aged, 80 and over , Urologic Neoplasms/mortality , Urologic Neoplasms/pathology , Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urologic Neoplasms/therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Metastasis
13.
Neurol Ther ; 13(3): 809-824, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678112

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic neuromuscular disease leading to significant disease burden. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of MG in Taiwan. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Prevalent patients with MG diagnosis (either ocular or generalized MG) from 2013 to 2019 were identified, and 2813 patients with initial MG diagnosis from 2014 to 2019 were further defined as the incident cohort. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and the occurrence of MG-related events were analyzed. RESULTS: The number of prevalent patients with MG increased from 4476 in 2013 to 5752 in 2019, with the prevalence rate increasing from 19 to 24 per 100,000 population. The incidence rate also slightly increased from 1.9 to 2.3 per 100,000 population during the study period. Almost all incident patients (99%, n = 2791) received MG-related treatment during the follow-up period. Among 1876 patients who received monotherapy as their initial treatment in the outpatient setting, the mean time from the index date to initial treatment was 48.8 (standard deviation 164.3) days, and most patients received acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (88.5%, n = 1661) as their initial treatment. During the first year after the index date, 133 (4.7%) incident patients experienced their first myasthenic crisis, and 96.2% of these events occurred within 3 months. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MG increased steadily in Taiwan, and the treatment of patients with MG was consistent with guidelines. Despite a high treatment rate, patients still experienced MG-related events, highlighting the limitation of current treatments and emphasizing the need for early intervention and novel treatment approaches.

14.
Int J Womens Health ; 16: 707-716, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38680943

ABSTRACT

Background: Menstrual-related headache (MRH) is the most prevalent health condition among young females that limits productivity and social life. However, the magnitude of the problem and its characteristics have not been studied in Ethiopia. Objective: This study aimed to assess the prevalence, characteristics, and treatment of MRH among undergraduate female students at the College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among undergraduate female students from May to June 2023. A random sample of 1000 females were approached who fulfilled the eligibility criteria using the online electronic method. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the severity of pain. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 1000 students who approached online, 757 were included in the final analyses. The prevalence of MRH was (86, 11.4%) and 32.6% of them has experienced the headache before two to three days of menses. The median number of days of missed social activities and reduced productivity was three and one day, respectively. Being single was 6.24 times more likely to have severe MRH (AOR = 6.24, 95% CI: 2.73-14.26, p=0.001) and pharmacy students were less likely (AOR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16-0.61, p = 0.001) to have severe pain. Conclusion: Our findings illustrated that MRH among young female students adversely affects students' productivity and social life. This demands interventions to reduce the impact and should pay attention in the future, particularly to create awareness to enhance screening and rendering various treatment options for the target population.

15.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(9): 1108-1120, 2024 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577179

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although chronic erosive gastritis (CEG) is common, its clinical characteristics have not been fully elucidated. The lack of consensus regarding its treatment has resulted in varied treatment regimens. AIM: To explore the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and short-term outcomes in CEG patients in China. METHODS: We recruited patients with chronic non-atrophic or mild-to-moderate atrophic gastritis with erosion based on endoscopy and pathology. Patients and treating physicians completed a questionnaire regarding history, endoscopic findings, and treatment plans as well as a follow-up questionnaire to investigate changes in symptoms after 4 wk of treatment. RESULTS: Three thousand five hundred sixty-three patients from 42 centers across 24 cities in China were included. Epigastric pain (68.0%), abdominal distension (62.6%), and postprandial fullness (47.5%) were the most common presenting symptoms. Gastritis was classified as chronic non-atrophic in 69.9% of patients. Among those with erosive lesions, 72.1% of patients had lesions in the antrum, 51.0% had multiple lesions, and 67.3% had superficial flat lesions. In patients with epigastric pain, the combination of a mucosal protective agent (MPA) and proton pump inhibitor was more effective. For those with postprandial fullness, acid regurgitation, early satiety, or nausea, a MPA appeared more promising. CONCLUSION: CEG is a multifactorial disease which is common in Asian patients and has non-specific symptoms. Gastroscopy may play a major role in its detection and diagnosis. Treatment should be individualized based on symptom profile.


Subject(s)
Gastritis, Atrophic , Gastritis , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Stomach Ulcer , Humans , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Gastritis/diagnosis , Gastritis/drug therapy , Gastritis/epidemiology , Gastritis, Atrophic/diagnosis , Gastritis, Atrophic/epidemiology , Gastritis, Atrophic/pathology , Gastroscopy , Helicobacter Infections/pathology , Life Style , Pain , Stomach Ulcer/pathology
16.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1368606, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571509

ABSTRACT

Gliomas are a group of heterogeneous tumors that account for substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs to patients and healthcare systems globally. Survival varies considerably by grade, histology, biomarkers, and genetic alterations such as IDH mutations and MGMT promoter methylation, and treatment, but is poor for some grades and histologies, with many patients with glioblastoma surviving less than a year from diagnosis. The present review provides an introduction to glioma, including its classification, epidemiology, economic and humanistic burden, as well as treatment options. Another focus is on treatment recommendations for IDH-mutant astrocytoma, IDH-mutant oligodendroglioma, and glioblastoma, which were synthesized from recent guidelines. While recommendations are nuanced and reflect the complexity of the disease, maximum safe resection is typically the first step in treatment, followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy using temozolomide or procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine. Immunotherapies and targeted therapies currently have only a limited role due to disappointing clinical trial results, including in recurrent glioblastoma, for which the nitrosourea lomustine remains the de facto standard of care. The lack of treatment options is compounded by frequently suboptimal clinical practice, in which patients do not receive adequate therapy after resection, including delayed, shortened, or discontinued radiotherapy and chemotherapy courses due to treatment side effects. These unmet needs will require significant efforts to address, including a continued search for novel treatment options, increased awareness of clinical guidelines, improved toxicity management for chemotherapy, and the generation of additional and more robust clinical and health economic evidence.

17.
EJHaem ; 5(2): 346-352, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38633123

ABSTRACT

Pharmacotherapy options for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) have expanded significantly in recent years. These options include chemotherapy, chemoimmunotherapy and signalling pathway inhibitors. A notable shift in the treatment landscape began with the widespread adoption of ibrutinib in 2016. This analysis of claims data focuses on understanding how the use of novel therapies has evolved in clinical practice over the past decade in Germany. Anonymized claims data (2010-2022) from German statutory health insurance was used, covering patient demographics, treatments, and prescriptions. The study population included patients with two confirmed CLL diagnoses. Treatment patterns were analysed, and survival outcomes were compared using time-to-event analyses. In the analysed cohort of 2983 incident CLL patients, 1041 started first-line therapy between 2011 and 2022, with a median duration of 18 months from diagnosis to the first prescription. Chemoimmunotherapy, the predominant 1L therapy until 2019, decreased significantly, while targeted therapy usage increased from 3% in 2015 to 77% in 2022. Targeted therapies became dominant in patients receiving treatment for relapsed or refractory disease after 2016. Median treatment durations were: 122 days for chemo, 176 days for chemo-immuno, and 373 days for targeted therapy. The overall survival for patients diagnosed in or after 2016 was significantly better (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.69)). The adoption of targeted therapies like ibrutinib and venetoclax has transformed CLL treatment in Germany, leading to improved patient outcomes. Additionally, we demonstrate successful adherence to evolving clinical guidelines.

18.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 40(5): 781-788, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465414

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among individuals with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) receiving second-line therapies (rituximab, romiplostim, or eltrombopag). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large administrative claims database (January 2013-May 2020) among continuously enrolled patients ≥18 years prescribed second-line ITP therapies. The index date was the date of the first claim of the study medications. Treatment patterns and outcomes were measured during the 12-month follow-up period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates across treatment groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare treatment patterns and bleeding risk outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 695 patients were included (rituximab, N = 285; romiplostim, N = 212; eltrombopag, N = 198). After IPTW, all baseline covariates were balanced. Compared to eltrombopag, patients in the rituximab cohort were 57% more likely to receive other ITP therapies (systematic corticosteroids or third-line therapies) during the follow-up period (odds ratio [OR] = 1.571, p = .030). There was no significant difference in the odds of receiving a different second-line therapy or experiencing a bleeding-related episode among three groups (p > .050). Patients in the romiplostim cohort were 69% more likely to receive rescue therapy compared to those in the rituximab cohort (OR = 1.688, p = .025). CONCLUSION: Patients with ITP receiving rituximab were more likely to need other ITP therapies but did not experience higher risk of bleeding compared to those receiving eltrombopag or romiplostim. Benefits, risks, cost-effectiveness, and patient preference should all be considered in optimizing second-line therapy for ITP.


Subject(s)
Benzoates , Hydrazines , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic , Pyrazoles , Receptors, Fc , Recombinant Fusion Proteins , Rituximab , Thrombopoietin , Humans , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/drug therapy , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/epidemiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Rituximab/adverse effects , Hydrazines/therapeutic use , Hydrazines/adverse effects , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use , Thrombopoietin/therapeutic use , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Receptors, Fc/therapeutic use , Benzoates/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Databases, Factual
19.
Cureus ; 16(2): e54799, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38529426

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the common clinical diagnoses and treatment management of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in children and determine when antibiotics are recommended and prescribed. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical charts was carried out at King Salman Bin Abdulaziz Medical City (KSAMC) Hospital to assess pediatric patients diagnosed with ARIs aged 0-14 years, excluding those requiring antibiotics for conditions other than ARIs. Data, including demographic diagnoses and treatment management, were extracted using consecutive sampling, and statistical analyses were conducted using Jamovi software. RESULTS: A total of 285 pediatric patients were included, with a median age of 3 (IQR = 1-6) years and a male predominance of 59.2%. Bronchopneumonia was the most common respiratory disease, diagnosed in 39.1% of participants. The median durations for illness and hospital admission were four and three days, respectively. Clinical evaluations showed an average respiratory rate of 28±10.5 breaths per minute and a mean oxygen saturation of 96.4±3.46% through pulse oximetry. The use of antibiotics was commonly prescribed in ARI patients only when accompanied by certain bacterial infections (46.32%). CONCLUSIONS: ARIs are a common viral health issue among children, emphasizing that not all ARIs in children are caused by bacteria and that antibiotics should only be used when there is a bacterial infection present. Enhanced diagnostic precision, patient awareness, and provider education are the global community's recommendations to prevent the presence of antibiotic resistance and the irrational use of antibiotics.

20.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 361-369, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38375556

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study assessed the treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), costs, and annual prevalence and incidence of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in China. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using electronic medical records (EMR) of patients with prostate cancer from three tertiary-care hospitals in China between January 2014 and March 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze study outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 1086 patients with mHSPC and 679 patients with nmCRPC were included. From 2015 to 2020, the annual percentage of prevalent and incident cases of mHSPC decreased from 22.4% to 20.0% and 11.1% to 6.9%, respectively; for nmCRPC, these increased from 3.8% to 13.6% and 3.3% to 8.4%. Androgen-deprivation therapy and first-generation antiandrogens (bicalutamide or flutamide) were the most frequently prescribed prostate cancer-related medications at baseline and follow-up in patients with mHSPC. Bicalutamide was the most frequently prescribed prostate cancer-related medication during follow-up in patients with nmCRPC. For mHSPC, inpatient admission costs were the highest, with the median (interquartile range) costs per person-month being USD 403.00 (USD 85.50-1226.20), whereas outpatient visit costs were the highest for nmCRPC (USD 372.60 [USD 139.50-818.50]). LIMITATIONS: EMR-based study design did not capture treatment patterns, HRU and associated costs, and healthcare encounters that occurred outside of participating hospitals, which could have led to underestimation of the true disease burden. CONCLUSIONS: A contrasting trend of a decline in the prevalence and incidence of mHSPC and an increase in these for nmCRPC was observed between 2015 and 2020 in China. Androgen-deprivation therapy and first-generation antiandrogens were the most frequently prescribed prostate cancer-related medications. Healthcare resource utilization was driven by inpatient costs in mHSPC and outpatient costs in nmCRPC.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Anilides , Nitriles , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Tosyl Compounds , Male , Humans , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Androgens/therapeutic use , Delivery of Health Care
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL