Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 87
Filter
1.
J Virol ; 96(8): e0003422, 2022 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35384694

ABSTRACT

With the much-debated exception of the modestly reduced acquisition reported for the RV144 efficacy trial, HIV-1 vaccines have not protected humans against infection, and a vaccine of similar design to that tested in RV144 was not protective in a later trial, HVTN 702. Similar vaccine regimens have also not consistently protected nonhuman primates (NHPs) against viral acquisition. Conversely, experimental vaccines of different designs have protected macaques from viral challenges but then failed to protect humans, while many other HIV-1 vaccine candidates have not protected NHPs. While efficacy varies more in NHPs than humans, vaccines have failed to protect in the most stringent NHP model. Intense investigations have aimed to identify correlates of protection (CoPs), even in the absence of net protection. Unvaccinated animals and humans vary vastly in their susceptibility to infection and in their innate and adaptive responses to the vaccines; hence, merely statistical associations with factors that do not protect are easily found. Systems biological analyses, including artificial intelligence, have identified numerous candidate CoPs but with no clear consistency within or between species. Proposed CoPs sometimes have only tenuous mechanistic connections to immune protection. In contrast, neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are a central mechanistic CoP for vaccines that succeed against other viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. No HIV-1 vaccine candidate has yet elicited potent and broadly active NAbs in NHPs or humans, but narrow-specificity NAbs against the HIV-1 isolate corresponding to the immunogen do protect against infection by the autologous virus. Here, we analyze why so many HIV-1 vaccines have failed, summarize the outcomes of vaccination in NHPs and humans, and discuss the value and pitfalls of hunting for CoPs other than NAbs. We contrast the failure to find a consistent CoP for HIV-1 vaccines with the identification of NAbs as the principal CoP for SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines , HIV-1 , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Animals , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Artificial Intelligence , COVID-19 Vaccines/standards , Data Interpretation, Statistical , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Virol ; 96(2): e0164321, 2022 01 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34730393

ABSTRACT

Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) has been correlated with reduced risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in several preclinical vaccine trials and in the RV144 clinical trial, indicating that this is a relevant antibody function to study. Given the diversity of HIV-1, the breadth of vaccine-induced antibody responses is a critical parameter to understand if a universal vaccine is to be realized. Moreover, the breadth of ADCC responses can be influenced by different vaccine strategies and regimens, including adjuvants. Therefore, to accurately evaluate ADCC and to compare vaccine regimens, it is important to understand the range of HIV Envelope (Env) susceptibility to these responses. These evaluations have been limited because of the complexity of the assay and the lack of a comprehensive panel of viruses for the assessment of these humoral responses. Here, we used 29 HIV-1 infectious molecular clones (IMCs) representing different Envelope subtypes and circulating recombinant forms to characterize susceptibility to ADCC from antibodies in plasma from infected individuals, including 13 viremic individuals, 10 controllers, and six with broadly neutralizing antibody responses. We found in our panel that ADCC susceptibility of the IMCs in our panel did not cluster by subtype, infectivity, level of CD4 downregulation, level of shedding, or neutralization sensitivity. Using partitioning around medoids (PAM) clustering to distinguish smaller groups of IMCs with similar ADCC susceptibility, we identified nested panels of four to eight IMCs that broadly represent the ADCC susceptibility of the entire 29-IMC panel. These panels, together with reagents developed to specifically accommodate circulating viruses at the geographical sites of vaccine trials, will provide a powerful tool to harmonize ADCC data generated across different studies and to detect common themes of ADCC responses elicited by various vaccines. IMPORTANCE Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) responses were found to correlate with reduced risk of infection in the RV144 trial of the only human HIV-1 vaccine to show any efficacy to date. However, reagents to understand the breadth and magnitude of these responses across preclinical and clinical vaccine trials remain underdeveloped. In this study, we characterize HIV-1 infectious molecular clones encoding 29 distinct Envelope strains (Env-IMCs) to understand factors that impact virus susceptibility to ADCC and use statistical methods to identify smaller nested panels of four to eight Env-IMCs that accurately represent the full set. These reagents can be used as standardized reagents across studies to fully understand how ADCC may affect efficacy of future vaccine studies and how studies differ in the breadth of responses developed.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/immunology , Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity , HIV Antibodies/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , env Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Genetic Variation , HIV Antibodies/blood , HIV Infections/blood , HIV-1/classification , HIV-1/genetics , Humans , Neutralization Tests/standards , Phylogeny , env Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/genetics
3.
Cell Host Microbe ; 27(5): 695-698, 2020 05 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32407707

ABSTRACT

As scientists consider SARS-CoV-2 vaccine design, we discuss problems that may be encountered and how to tackle them by what we term "rational vaccine design." We further discuss approaches to pan-coronavirus vaccines. We draw on experiences from recent research on several viruses including HIV and influenza, as well as coronaviruses.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Viral Vaccines/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/standards , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Research Design/trends , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 542, 2018 01 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29323175

ABSTRACT

Immunization with HIV AIDSVAX gp120 vaccines in the phase III VAX003 and VAX004 trials did not confer protection. To understand the shortcomings in antibody (Ab) responses induced by these vaccines, we evaluated the kinetics of Ab responses to the V1V2 and V3 regions of gp120 and the induction of Ab-mediated antiviral functions during the course of 7 vaccinations over a 30.5-month period. Plasma samples from VAX003 and VAX004 vaccinees and placebo recipients were measured for ELISA-binding Abs and for virus neutralization, Ab-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), and Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Ab responses to V1V2 and V3 peaked after 3 to 4 immunizations and declined after 5 to 7 immunizations. The deteriorating responses were most evident against epitopes in the underside of the V1V2 ß-barrel and in the V3 crown. Correspondingly, vaccinees demonstrated higher neutralization against SF162 pseudovirus sensitive to anti-V1V2 and anti-V3 Abs after 3 or 4 immunizations than after 7 immunizations. Higher levels of ADCP and ADCC were also observed at early or mid-time points as compared with the final time point. Hence, VAX003 and VAX004 vaccinees generated V1V2- and V3-binding Abs and functional Abs after 3 to 4 immunizations, but subsequent boosts did not maintain these responses.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/immunology , HIV Antibodies/immunology , HIV Envelope Protein gp120/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Cytotoxicity, Immunologic , Epitopes/chemistry , Epitopes/immunology , HIV Envelope Protein gp120/chemistry , Humans , Phagocytosis
5.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 23(2): 84-94, 2016 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26656117

ABSTRACT

Extensive studies have demonstrated that infant immune responses are distinct from those of adults. Despite these differences, infant immunization can elicit protective immune responses at levels comparable to or, in some cases, higher than adult immune responses to many vaccines. To date, only a few HIV vaccine candidates have been tested in infant populations, and none of them evaluated vaccine efficacy. Recent exciting studies showing that HIV-infected infants can develop broad neutralizing antibody responses and that some HIV vaccine regimens can elicit high levels of potentially protective antibodies in infants provide support for the development and testing of HIV vaccines in pediatric populations. In this review, we discuss the differences in adult and infant immune responses in the setting of HIV infection and vaccination.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , HIV Antibodies/immunology , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , Immunity, Humoral , AIDS Vaccines/administration & dosage , Adult , Aging , Antibodies, Neutralizing/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Child , HIV Antibodies/biosynthesis , HIV Antibodies/blood , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Immunity, Cellular , Infant , Vaccination , Vaccines, DNA/immunology
7.
Vaccine ; 33(15): 1757-66, 2015 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25698494

ABSTRACT

The Division of AIDS Vaccine Research Program funds the discovery and development of HIV/AIDS vaccine candidates. Basic researchers, having discovered a potential vaccine in the laboratory, next want to take that candidate into the clinic to test the concept in humans, to see if it translates. Many of them have heard of "cGMP" and know that they are supposed to make a "GMP product" to take into the clinic, but often they are not very familiar with what "cGMP" means and why these good practices are so important. As members of the Vaccine Translational Research Branch, we frequently get asked "can't we use the material we made in the lab in the clinic?" or "aren't Phase 1 studies exempt from cGMP?" Over the years, we have had many experiences where researchers or their selected contract manufacturing organizations have not applied an appropriate degree of compliance with cGMP suitable for the clinical phase of development. We share some of these experiences and the lessons learned, along with explaining the importance of cGMP, just what cGMP means, and what they can assure, in an effort to de-mystify this subject and facilitate the rapid and safe translational development of HIV vaccines.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/standards , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Translational Research, Biomedical/standards , Clinical Trials as Topic , Government Regulation , Humans , Translational Research, Biomedical/legislation & jurisprudence
8.
Vaccine ; 32(35): 4365-4368, 2014 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24950356

ABSTRACT

High-throughput analyses of RNA and protein expression are increasingly used for better understanding of vaccine-induced immunity and protection against infectious disease. With an increasing number of vaccine candidates in clinical development, it is timely to consider standardisation and harmonisation of sample collection, storage and analysis to ensure results of highest quality from these precious samples. These challenges were discussed by a group of international experts during a workshop organised by TRANSVAC, a European Commission-funded Research Infrastructure project. The main conclusions were: Platforms are rarely standardised for use in preclinical and clinical studies. Coordinated efforts should continue to harmonise the experimental set up of these studies, as well as the establishment of internal standards and controls. This will ensure comparability, efficiency and feasibility of the global analyses performed on preclinical and clinical data sets.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Malaria Vaccines/immunology , Malaria Vaccines/standards , Tuberculosis Vaccines/immunology , Tuberculosis Vaccines/standards , Vaccination/standards , Biomedical Research/standards , Humans , Vaccination/methods
9.
Stat Med ; 33(4): 675-92, 2014 Feb 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24009099

ABSTRACT

Data collected in many epidemiological or clinical research studies are often contaminated with measurement errors that may be of classical or Berkson error type. The measurement error may also be a combination of both classical and Berkson errors and failure to account for both errors could lead to unreliable inference in many situations. We consider regression analysis in generalized linear models when some covariates are prone to a mixture of Berkson and classical errors, and calibration data are available only for some subjects in a subsample. We propose an expected estimating equation approach to accommodate both errors in generalized linear regression analyses. The proposed method can consistently estimate the classical and Berkson error variances based on the available data, without knowing the mixture percentage. We investigated its finite-sample performance numerically. Our method is illustrated by an application to real data from an HIV vaccine study.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Linear Models , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Computer Simulation , Female , HIV/growth & development , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Regression Analysis
10.
J Virol ; 88(5): 2489-507, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24352443

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Standardized assessments of HIV-1 vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibody responses are complicated by the genetic and antigenic variability of the viral envelope glycoproteins (Envs). To address these issues, suitable reference strains are needed that are representative of the global epidemic. Several panels have been recommended previously, but no clear answers have been available on how many and which strains are best suited for this purpose. We used a statistical model selection method to identify a global panel of reference Env clones from among 219 Env-pseudotyped viruses assayed in TZM-bl cells with sera from 205 HIV-1-infected individuals. The Envs and sera were sampled globally from diverse geographic locations and represented all major genetic subtypes and circulating recombinant forms of the virus. Assays with a panel size of only nine viruses adequately represented the spectrum of HIV-1 serum neutralizing activity seen with the larger panel of 219 viruses. An optimal panel of nine viruses was selected and augmented with three additional viruses for greater genetic and antigenic coverage. The spectrum of HIV-1 serum neutralizing activity seen with the final 12-virus panel closely approximated the activity seen with subtype-matched viruses. Moreover, the final panel was highly sensitive for detection of many of the known broadly neutralizing antibodies. For broader assay applications, all 12 Env clones were converted to infectious molecular clones using a proviral backbone carrying a Renilla luciferase reporter gene (Env.IMC.LucR viruses). This global panel should facilitate highly standardized assessments of vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies across multiple HIV-1 vaccine platforms in different parts of the world. IMPORTANCE: An effective HIV-1 vaccine will need to overcome the extraordinary genetic variability of the virus, where most variation occurs in the viral envelope glycoproteins that are the sole targets for neutralizing antibodies. Efforts to elicit broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies that will protect against infection by most circulating strains of the virus are guided in part by in vitro assays that determine the ability of vaccine-elicited antibodies to neutralize genetically diverse HIV-1 variants. Until now, little information was available on how many and which strains of the virus are best suited for this purpose. We applied robust statistical methods to evaluate a large neutralization data set and identified a small panel of viruses that are a good representation of the global epidemic. The neutralization properties of this new panel of reference strains should facilitate the development of an effective HIV-1 vaccine.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , HIV Antibodies/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , env Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/immunology , Amino Acid Sequence , Antibody Specificity/immunology , Cell Line , Cluster Analysis , Cross Reactions/immunology , Epitopes/immunology , HIV-1/classification , HIV-1/genetics , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Neutralization Tests/standards , Phylogeny , Receptors, HIV , Reproducibility of Results , Sequence Alignment , Viral Tropism , env Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/chemistry , env Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/genetics
11.
Curr HIV Res ; 11(6): 450-63, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24033301

ABSTRACT

Although immune correlates of protection for HIV vaccines have remained an intractable question, RV144 provided the first evidence that an HIV vaccine could provide protective efficacy against HIV acquisition. The study of correlates of risk has opened large and unforeseen avenues of exploration and hope for the most exciting time of HIV vaccine development. Several elements in the RV144 post-hoc analysis and recent macaque challenge studies suggest that antibodies directed against the V2 loop of gp120 are functional and may have played a protective role against virus acquisition. Several protective mechanisms against sexual transmission of HIV are evoked including blocking the gp120- α4ß7 interaction and ADCC although possibly mitigated by high levels of Env-specific IgA, both mechanisms contributing at least partially to the protective effect. Several questions remain unanswered that will deserve intensive assessments, in particular, IgG and IgA Env antibodies in mucosal secretions, Env-specific IgG subclasses, cross-reaction of V2 antibodies, role of T-follicular helper cells, and B-cell memory. Whether RV144 correlates of risk are universal and apply at least partially to other populations at higher risk for HIV acquisition and other modes of transmission (rectal, injecting drug users) is unknown and remains to be explored. Future efficacy trials using the same vaccine concept tested in high-risk heterosexual populations and in men having sex with men may answer this question. In addition, the determination of early events in the pathogenesis among HIV-infected vaccine recipients based on current correlates knowledge would offer unprecedented information about correlates biomarkers in the peripheral blood and gut mucosa during early acute HIV infection.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/standards , HIV Antibodies/blood , HIV Infections/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/immunology , Animals , Clinical Trials as Topic , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV-1/immunology , Humans
12.
Curr HIV Res ; 11(6): 441-9, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24033299

ABSTRACT

The past few years have witnessed many promising advances in HIV prevention strategies involving preexposure prophylaxis approaches. Some may now wonder whether an HIV vaccine is still needed, and whether developing one is even possible. The partial efficacy reported in the RV144 trial and the encouraging results of the accompanying immune correlates analysis suggest that an effective HIV vaccine is achievable. These successes have provided a large impetus and guidance for conducting more HIV vaccine trials. A key lesson learned from RV144 is that assessment of HIV acquisition is now a feasible and valuable primary objective for HIV preventive vaccine trials. In this article we review how RV144 and other HIV vaccine efficacy trials have instructed the field and highlight some of the HIV vaccine concepts in clinical development. After a long and significant investment, HIV vaccine clinical research is paying off in the form of valuable lessons that, if applied effectively, will accelerate the path toward a safe and effective vaccine. Together with other HIV prevention approaches, preventive and therapeutic HIV vaccines will be invaluable tools in bringing the epidemic to an end.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines , HIV Infections/prevention & control , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Clinical Trials as Topic , HIV Infections/immunology , Humans , Research Design
13.
Stat Med ; 32(26): 4526-39, 2013 Nov 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23686390

ABSTRACT

We describe rank-based approaches to assess principal stratification treatment effects in studies where the outcome of interest is only well-defined in a subgroup selected after randomization. Our methods are sensitivity analyses, in that estimands are identified by fixing a parameter and then we investigate the sensitivity of results by varying this parameter over a range of plausible values. We present three rank-based test statistics and compare their performance through simulations, and provide recommendations. We also study three different bootstrap approaches for determining levels of significance. Finally, we apply our methods to two studies: an HIV vaccine trial and a prostate cancer prevention trial.


Subject(s)
Data Interpretation, Statistical , Treatment Outcome , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Computer Simulation , Finasteride/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy
14.
Stat Med ; 31(28): 3748-59, 2012 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22764070

ABSTRACT

In biomedical research such as the development of vaccines for infectious diseases or cancer, study outcomes measured by an assay or device are often collected from multiple sources or laboratories. Measurement error that may vary between laboratories needs to be adjusted for when combining samples across data sources. We incorporate such adjustment in the main study by comparing and combining independent samples from different laboratories via integration of external data, collected on paired samples from the same two laboratories. We propose the following: (i) normalization of individual-level data from two laboratories to the same scale via the expectation of true measurements conditioning on the observed; (ii) comparison of mean assay values between two independent samples in the main study accounting for inter-source measurement error; and (iii) sample size calculations of the paired-sample study so that hypothesis testing error rates are appropriately controlled in the main study comparison. Because the goal is not to estimate the true underlying measurements but to combine data on the same scale, our proposed methods do not require that the true values for the error-prone measurements are known in the external data. Simulation results under a variety of scenarios demonstrate satisfactory finite sample performance of our proposed methods when measurement errors vary. We illustrate our methods using real enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay data generated by two HIV vaccine laboratories.


Subject(s)
Bias , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Multicenter Studies as Topic/statistics & numerical data , AIDS Vaccines/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Calibration , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Computer Simulation , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Laboratories/standards , Laboratories/statistics & numerical data , Multicenter Studies as Topic/methods , Multicenter Studies as Topic/standards , Regression Analysis , Research Design
15.
Glob Public Health ; 7(1): 87-100, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21390966

ABSTRACT

This study explored HIV vaccine acceptability and strategies for culturally appropriate dissemination among sexually diverse Aboriginal peoples in Canada, among those at highest HIV risk. We conducted four focus groups (n=23) with Aboriginal male (1) and female (1) service users, peer educators (1) and service providers (1) in Ontario, Canada. Transcripts were analysed with narrative thematic techniques from grounded theory, using NVivo. Participants' mean age was 37 years; about half (52%) were female, half (48%) Two-spirit or lesbian, gay or bisexual (LGB)-identified, 48% had a high-school education or less and 57% were unemployed. Vaccine uptake was motivated by community survival; however, negative HIV vaccine perceptions, historically based mistrust of government and healthcare institutions, perceived conflict between western and traditional medicine, sexual prejudice and AIDS stigma within and outside of Aboriginal communities, and vaccine cost may present formidable obstacles to HIV vaccine acceptability. Culturally appropriate processes of engagement emerged on individual levels (i.e., respect for self-determination, explanations in Native languages, use of modelling and traditional healing concepts) and community levels (i.e., leadership by Aboriginal HIV advocates and political representatives, identification of gatekeepers, and procuring Elders' endorsements). Building on cultural strengths and acknowledging the history and context of mistrust and social exclusion are fundamental to effective HIV vaccine dissemination.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/administration & dosage , Cultural Competency , HIV Infections/ethnology , Health Education/standards , Health Services, Indigenous/standards , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Sexual Behavior/ethnology , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Community Participation , Female , Focus Groups , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , Health Education/methods , Health Services, Indigenous/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Indians, North American/psychology , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Inuit/psychology , Inuit/statistics & numerical data , Male , Ontario/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Peer Group , Prevalence , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data
18.
PLoS Pathog ; 7(5): e1001341, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21589893

ABSTRACT

A major challenge to developing a successful HIV vaccine is the vast diversity of viral sequences, yet it is generally assumed that an epitope conserved between different strains will be recognised by responding T-cells. We examined whether an invariant HLA-B8 restricted Nef90₋97 epitope FL8 shared between five high titre viruses and eight recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing Nef from different viral isolates (clades A-H) could activate antiviral activity in FL8-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL). Surprisingly, despite epitope conservation, we found that CTL antiviral efficacy is dependent on the infecting viral isolate. Only 23% of Nef proteins, expressed by HIV-1 isolates or as recombinant vaccinia-Nef, were optimally recognised by CTL. Recognition of the HIV-1 isolates by CTL was independent of clade-grouping but correlated with virus-specific polymorphisms in the epitope flanking region, which altered immunoproteasomal cleavage resulting in enhanced or impaired epitope generation. The finding that the majority of virus isolates failed to present this conserved epitope highlights the importance of viral variance in CTL epitope flanking regions on the efficiency of antigen processing, which has been considerably underestimated previously. This has important implications for future vaccine design strategies since efficient presentation of conserved viral epitopes is necessary to promote enhanced anti-viral immune responses.


Subject(s)
Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/genetics , HIV-1/immunology , Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex/physiology , T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic/immunology , nef Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/standards , Amino Acid Sequence , Antigen Presentation/genetics , Conserved Sequence , DNA, Viral/chemistry , DNA, Viral/genetics , Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assay , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/physiology , HIV Antigens/metabolism , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/genetics , HIV-1/metabolism , HLA-B8 Antigen/metabolism , Humans , Interferon-gamma/metabolism , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutation , Polymorphism, Genetic , Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex/immunology , Sequence Analysis, DNA , T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic/virology , Vaccinia virus/genetics , nef Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/genetics , nef Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/metabolism
20.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 55 Suppl 2: S128-31, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21406982

ABSTRACT

A safe and effective HIV vaccine is needed to curtail the US and global epidemics. However, the search for one has been elusive despite more than 25 years of focused research. Results from the RV144 Thai efficacy trial have renewed hope that a vaccine may protect against HIV acquisition. We can draw several scientific and operational lessons from RV144 and other recent tests-of-concept efficacy trials. Here we describe how trial results, some unexpected, highlight the fundamental role these clinical studies play in HIV vaccine discovery. These trials also teach us that transparency in data analysis and results dissemination can yield substantial rewards and that efforts to engage communities, particularly those most heavily affected by the epidemic, are needed to augment research literacy and trial recruitment. Future efficacy trial designs may incorporate novel, partially effective prevention strategies. Although greater in size and complexity, these trials may offer unique opportunities to explore synergies with vaccines under study.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/standards , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Research Design , Viral Load
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...