Comparison of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) as maintenance therapy for newly-diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer with BRCA mutational status: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) are ever-changing. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and overall safety of available PARPi as maintenance therapy for BRCA mutation status in patients with newly diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent (PSR) OC patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Relevant RCTs were systematically retrieved from PubMed and Embase until 31 May 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on BRCA mutation status and adverse events (AEs) regardless of mutation were efficacy and safety endpoints. RESULTS: In newly diagnosed BRCAm-OC patients, olaparib (HR: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 0.43) and other PARPis [niraparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.55), rucaparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.76) and veliparib (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.69)] had a statistically significant effect on PFS versus placebo. In BRCAm-PSROC patients, Olaparib exhibited significant benefit (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.88) for OS compared to other PARPis. In BRCAwt-PSR OC patients, Olaparib showed a favorable OS benefit than other PARPis (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.57,1.22). Overall, safety profile of all PARPis was acceptable. CONCLUSION: All PARPis showed significant benefit, with olaparib showing greater benefit in newly diagnosed and PSR OC women. REGISTRATION: CRD42021288932.

Flow cytometry for comprehensive assessment of platelet functional activity in response to ADP stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: Flow cytometry with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) allows to characterize molecular changes of platelet function caused by this physiologically important activation, but the methodology has not been thoroughly investigated, standardized and characterized yet. We analyzed the influence of several major variables and chose optimal conditions for platelet function assessment. METHODS: For activation, 2.5 µM CaCl2 , 5 µM ADP and antibodies were added to diluted blood and incubated for 15 min. We analyzed kinetics of antibody binding and effects of their addition sequence, agonist concentration, blood dilution, exogenous calcium addition and platelet fixation. RESULTS: We tested our protocol on 11 healthy children, 22 healthy adult volunteers, 9 patients after a month on dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 7 adult patients and 14 children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We found that our protocol is highly sensitive to ADP stimulation with low percentage of aggregates formation. The assay is also sensitive to platelet function inhibition in post-PCI patients. Finally, platelet preactivation with ITP plasma was stronger and caused increase in activation response to ADP stimulation compared to preactivation with low dose of ADP. CONCLUSIONS: Our assay is sensitive to antiplatelet therapy and platelet preactivation in ITP patients under physiological conditions with minimal percentage of aggregates formation.

[Combination therapy with poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARPi) and androgen receptor signaling pathway (ARPi) inhibitors for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer]. / Kombinationstherapie mit Inhibitoren der Poly(Adenosindiphosphat-Ribose)-Polymerasen (PARPi) und des Androgenrezeptorsignalweges (ARPi) beim metastasierten kastrationsrefraktären Prostatakarzinom.

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease with varying clinical and molecular subtypes. Almost one-third of patients have abnormalities in homologous recombinant repair genes. Again, about one third of these mutations affect the BReast CAncer 1 or 2 (BRCA 1 or BRCA 2) genes, which generally render tumours receptive to treatment with poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). In 2020 the PARPi olaparib was approved for the treatment of mCRPC after progression with a new hormonal drug (androgen receptor signaling pathway inhibitors, ARPi). In 2022 and 2023 approval of two combination therapies followed, each combining a PARPi and an ARPi (olaparib plus abiraterone and niraparib plus abiraterone). The combination of talazoparib plus enzalutamide will be approved soon. This article introduces the pivotal clinical trials that led to the approval of the respective substances, reports the side effects that may occur during therapy with PARPi plus ARPi, and offers recommendations for management of these side effects.

Utilization Trends In Platelet Adenosine Diphosphate P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor and Cost Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Recent guidelines regarding acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have advocated for use of prasugrel and ticagrelor over clopidogrel for acute coronary syndrome. However, analyses from multiple databases have shown that clopidogrel continues to be the most commonly prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor. We aimed to evaluate the trends in utilization and cost of P2Y12 inhibitors for Medicare beneficiaries using data from Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Data Event set from 2011 to 2018 for P2Y12 inhibitors. Medicare part D total beneficiaries for P2Y12 receptor inhibitors increased from 2011 to 2018 by 34.8% from 2.45 million to 3.31 million. The total cost for P2Y12 antiplatelets decreased from $ 3.72 billion in 2011 to $ 0.72 billion in 2018 by 80.4%. The availability of generic clopidogrel drove the considerable total cost reduction. Clopidogrel was the most prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor since its introduction accounting for more than 90% of the Medicare beneficiaries from 2013 to 2018. Overall, the number of beneficiaries on newer P2Y12 inhibitors showed a steady increase with 5.9% beneficiaries on brilinta in 2018 and 2.1 % on prasugrel. The total cost of brilinta beneficiaries grew exponentially accounting for 59.2% of total cost in 2018 and average cost per beneficiary increased by 465% in study period. Despite the availability of generic version clopidogrel and prasugrel, 2,161,175 beneficiaries were on brand plavix and 87,174 on effient which contributed to the increased total expenditure. Earlier introduction and transition to generic versions of medication may help to reduce the drug cost and potentially enhance medication compliance.

CA-125 KELIM as a Potential Complementary Tool for Predicting Veliparib Benefit: An Exploratory Analysis From the VELIA/GOG-3005 Study.

PURPOSE: In VELIA trial, veliparib combined with carboplatin-paclitaxel, followed by maintenance (veliparib-throughout) was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel alone in patients with high-grade ovarian carcinomas. We explored the prognostic value of the modeled cancer antigen (CA)-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM), which is known to be an indicator of the intrinsic tumor chemosensitivity (the faster the rate of CA-125 decline, the higher the KELIM and the higher the chemosensitivity), and its association with benefit from veliparib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual KELIM values were estimated from longitudinal CA-125 kinetics. Patients were categorized as having favorable (≥ median) or unfavorable (< median) KELIM. The prognostic value of KELIM for veliparib-related PFS benefit was explored in cohorts treated with primary or interval debulking surgery, according to the surgery completeness, the disease progression risk group, and the homologous recombination (HR) status (BRCA mutation, HR deficiency [HRD], or HR proficiency [HRP]). RESULTS: The data from 854 of 1,140 enrolled patients were analyzed (primary debulking surgery, n = 700; interval debulking surgery, n = 154). Increasing KELIM values were associated with higher benefit from veliparib in HRD cancer, as were decreasing KELIM values in HRP cancer. The highest PFS benefit from veliparib was observed in patients with both favorable KELIM and BRCA mutation (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.61) or BRCA wild-type HRD cancer (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.70), consistent with the association between poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor efficacy and platinum sensitivity. In contrast, seventy-four percent of patients with a BRCA mutation and unfavorable KELIM progressed within 18 months while on veliparib. The patients with HRP cancer and unfavorable KELIM might have benefited from the veliparib chemosensitizing effect. CONCLUSION: In addition to HRD/BRCA status, the tumor primary chemosensitivity observed during the first-line chemotherapy might be another complementary determinant of poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor efficacy.

Resistance to Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors (PARPi): Mechanisms and Potential to Reverse.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will focus on the most common mechanisms for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors' (PARPi) resistance and the main strategies for overcoming acquired or de novo PARPi resistance. RECENT FINDINGS: Initial approvals for PARPi as part of treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) started in 2014 with patient with recurrent cancer characterized by BRCA mutations in the 3rd and 4th line and now have approvals for front-line maintenance in both the BRCA mutated and BRCAwt populations. As with all therapies, patients will eventually develop resistance to treatment. The most common mechanisms for PARPi resistance include reversion mutations, methylation events, and restoration of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) through combinations and targeting replication stress. As more and more patients receive initial treatment (and potential retreatment with PARPi), we need to better understand the mechanisms in which tumors acquire PARPi resistance.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of PARP Inhibitors in Oncology.

Olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib are poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors approved for the treatment of ovarian, breast, pancreatic, and/or prostate cancer. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors are potent inhibitors of the PARP enzymes with comparable half-maximal inhibitory concentrations in the nanomolar range. Olaparib and rucaparib are orally dosed twice a day, extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes, and inhibitors of several enzymes and drug transporters with a high risk for drug-drug interactions. Niraparib and talazoparib are orally dosed once a day with a lower risk for niraparib and a minimal risk for talazoparib to cause drug-drug interactions. All four PARP inhibitors show moderate-to-high interindividual variability in plasma exposure. Higher exposure is associated with an increase in toxicity, mostly hematological toxicity. For talazoparib, exposure-efficacy relationships have been described, but for olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib this relationship remains inconclusive. Further studies are required to investigate exposure-response relationships to improve dosing of PARP inhibitors, in which therapeutic drug monitoring could play an important role. In this review, we give an overview of the pharmacokinetic properties of the four PARP inhibitors, including considerations for patients with renal dysfunction or hepatic impairment, the effect of food, and drug-drug interactions. Furthermore, we focus on the pharmacodynamics and summarize the available exposure-efficacy and exposure-toxicity relationships.

State of the Biomarker Science in Ovarian Cancer: A National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting Report.

PURPOSE: Despite therapeutic advances in the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC), 5-year survival remains low, and patients eventually die from recurrent, chemotherapy-resistant disease. The National Cancer Gynecologic Cancer Steering Committee identified the integration of scientifically defined subgroups as a top strategic priority in clinical trial planning. METHODS: A group of experts was convened to review the scientific literature in OC to identify validated predictive biomarkers that could inform patient selection and treatment stratification. Here, we report on these findings and their potential for use in future clinical trial design on the basis of hierarchal evidence grading. RESULTS: The biomarkers were classified on the basis of mechanistic targeting, including DNA repair and replication stress, immunotherapy and tumor microenvironment, oncogenic signaling, and angiogenesis. Currently, BRCA mutations and homologous recombination deficiency to predict poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor response are supported in OC by the highest level of evidence. Additional biomarkers of response to agents targeting the pathways above have been identified but require prospective validation. CONCLUSION: Although a number of biomarkers of response to various agents in OC have been described in the literature, high-level evidence for the majority is lacking. This report highlights the unmet need for identification and validation of predictive biomarkers to guide therapy and future trial design in OC.

Using genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors to interrogate ovarian cancer metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy and patients present with significant metastatic burden, particularly to the adipose-rich microenvironment of the omentum. Recent evidence has highlighted the importance of metabolic adaptations in enabling this metastasis, leading to significant interest in evolving the arsenal of tools used to study OC metabolism. In this study, we demonstrate the capability of genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors to study OC, with a focus on 3D organoid models that better recapitulate in vivo tumor microenvironments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasmids encoding the metabolic biosensors HyPer, iNap, Peredox, and Perceval were transfected into 15 ovarian cancer cell lines to assay oxidative stress, NADPH/NADP+, NADH/NAD+, and ATP/ADP, respectively. Fluorescence readings were used to assay dynamic metabolic responses to omental conditioned media (OCM) and 100 µM carboplatin treatment. SKOV3 cells expressing HyPer were imaged as 2D monolayers, 3D organoids, and as in vivo metastases via an intravital omental window. We further established organoids from ascites collected from Stage III/IV OC patients with carboplatin-resistant or carboplatin-sensitive tumors (n = 8 total). These patient-derived organoids (PDOs) were engineered to express HyPer, and metabolic readings of oxidative stress were performed during treatment with 100 µM carboplatin. RESULTS: Exposure to OCM or carboplatin induced heterogenous metabolic changes in 15 OC cell lines, as measured using metabolic sensors. Oxidative stress of in vivo omental metastases, measured via intravital imaging of metastasizing SKOV3-HyPer cells, was more closely recapitulated by SKOV3-HyPer organoids than by 2D monolayers. Finally, carboplatin treatment of HyPer-expressing PDOs induced higher oxidative stress in organoids derived from carboplatin-resistant patients than from those derived from carboplatin-sensitive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that biosensors provide a useful method of studying dynamic metabolic changes in preclinical models of OC, including 3D organoids and intravital imaging. As 3D models of OC continue to evolve, the repertoire of biosensors will likely serve as valuable tools to probe the metabolic changes of clinical importance in OC.

Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing?

PURPOSE: In 2020, ASCO recommended that all women with epithelial ovarian cancer have germline testing for BRCA1/2 mutations, and those without a germline pathogenic variant (PV) should have somatic tumor testing to determine eligibility for a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. Consequently, the majority of patients with ovarian cancer will have both germline testing and somatic testing. An alternate strategy is tumor testing first and then germline testing if there is a PV in the tumor and/or significant family history. The objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the two testing strategies. METHODS: The Markov model compared the costs (US dollars) and benefits of two testing strategies for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: (1) ASCO strategy and (2) tumor testing triage for germline testing. Data were applied from SOLO-1, and costs were from wholesale acquisition prices, Medicare, and published sources. Sensitivity analyses accounted for uncertainty around various parameters. Monte Carlo simulation estimated the number tested and identified with germline and somatic BRCA PV for olaparib maintenance treatment annually in the US population. RESULTS: The ASCO strategy was more effective but more costly than tumor testing triage in identifying patients for olaparib, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $281,296 US dollars per progression-free life year gained. Assuming 10,000 eligible patients with ovarian cancer annually, Monte Carlo simulation yielded comparable numbers of patients with BRCA PV in the germline and tumor with the ASCO and tumor testing triage strategies (2,080 v 2,062, respectively), but substantially higher number of patients tested using the ASCO strategy (8,052 v 3,076). CONCLUSION: The ASCO strategy may identify more BRCA PVs but is not cost-effective. Tumor testing in epithelial ovarian cancer as triage for germline testing is the favored strategy in this health care system.

Biomarkers beyond BRCA: promising combinatorial treatment strategies in overcoming resistance to PARP inhibitors.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) exploit the concept of synthetic lethality and offer great promise in the treatment of tumors with deficiencies in homologous recombination (HR) repair. PARPi exert antitumor activity by blocking Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) and trapping PARP1 on damaged DNA. To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved four PARPi for the treatment of several cancer types including ovarian, breast, pancreatic and prostate cancer. Although patients with HR-deficient tumors benefit from PARPi, majority of tumors ultimately develop acquired resistance to PARPi. Furthermore, even though BRCA1/2 mutations are commonly used as markers of PARPi sensitivity in current clinical practice, not all patients with BRCA1/2 mutations have PARPi-sensitive disease. Thus, there is an urgent need to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of PARPi resistance to support the development of rational effective treatment strategies aimed at overcoming resistance to PARPi, as well as reliable biomarkers to accurately identify patients who will most likely benefit from treatment with PARPi, either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents, so called marker-guided effective therapy (Mget). In this review, we summarize the molecular mechanisms driving the efficacy of and resistance to PARPi as well as emerging therapeutic strategies to overcome PARPi resistance. We also highlight the identification of potential markers to predict PARPi resistance and guide promising PARPi-based combination strategies.

The synthetic lethality of targeting cell cycle checkpoints and PARPs in cancer treatment.

Continuous cell division is a hallmark of cancer, and the underlying mechanism is tumor genomics instability. Cell cycle checkpoints are critical for enabling an orderly cell cycle and maintaining genome stability during cell division. Based on their distinct functions in cell cycle control, cell cycle checkpoints are classified into two groups: DNA damage checkpoints and DNA replication stress checkpoints. The DNA damage checkpoints (ATM-CHK2-p53) primarily monitor genetic errors and arrest cell cycle progression to facilitate DNA repair. Unfortunately, genes involved in DNA damage checkpoints are frequently mutated in human malignancies. In contrast, genes associated with DNA replication stress checkpoints (ATR-CHK1-WEE1) are rarely mutated in tumors, and cancer cells are highly dependent on these genes to prevent replication catastrophe and secure genome integrity. At present, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) operate through "synthetic lethality" mechanism with mutant DNA repair pathways genes in cancer cells. However, an increasing number of patients are acquiring PARP inhibitor resistance after prolonged treatment. Recent work suggests that a combination therapy of targeting cell cycle checkpoints and PARPs act synergistically to increase the number of DNA errors, compromise the DNA repair machinery, and disrupt the cell cycle, thereby increasing the death rate of cancer cells with DNA repair deficiency or PARP inhibitor resistance. We highlight a combinational strategy involving PARP inhibitors and inhibition of two major cell cycle checkpoint pathways, ATM-CHK2-TP53 and ATR-CHK1-WEE1. The biological functions, resistance mechanisms against PARP inhibitors, advances in preclinical research, and clinical trials are also reviewed.

A phase Ib study of camrelizumab in combination with apatinib and fuzuloparib in patients with recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Strategies to improve activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are needed. Preclinical studies showed that antiangiogenic agents and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors might sensitize tumors to immunotherapy. Here, we investigated the tolerability, safety, and preliminary antitumor activity of camrelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in combination with apatinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor, and fuzuloparib, a PARP inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or metastatic TNBC. METHODS: This phase Ib study included a dose-finding part and a dose-expansion part. In the dose-finding part, a 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme was introduced. Patients were given camrelizumab (200 mg every 2 weeks) plus apatinib (375 mg or 500 mg once daily) and fuzuloparib (starting dose 100 mg twice daily) every 28-day cycle. After evaluation of the tolerability and safety of the dosing regimens, a clinical recommended dose was determined for the dose-expansion part. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were enrolled. Three patients received camrelizumab 200 mg + apatinib 375 mg + fuzuloparib 100 mg, and 29 received camrelizumab 200 mg + apatinib 500 mg + fuzuloparib 100 mg (clinical recommended dose). No DLTs were observed in either group. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were decreased white blood cell count (20.7%), hypertension (13.8%), decreased neutrophil count (10.3%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (10.3%). Two patients discontinued study treatment due to immune-mediated hepatitis (n = 1) and anemia, decreased platelet count, decreased white blood cell count, increased alanine aminotransferase, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and increased γ-glutamyltransferase (n = 1). One patient died of unknown cause. Two (6.9% [95% CI, 0.9-22.8]) of 29 patients with camrelizumab 200 mg + apatinib 500 mg + fuzuloparib 100 mg had objective response. The disease control rate was 62.1% (95% CI, 42.3-79.3). The median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.6-7.3), and the 12-month overall survival rate was 64.2% (95% CI, 19.0-88.8). CONCLUSIONS: Combination of camrelizumab plus apatinib and fuzuloparib showed manageable safety profile and preliminary antitumor activity in patients with recurrent or metastatic TNBC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03945604 (May 10, 2019).

Oligo-Fucoidan supplementation enhances the effect of Olaparib on preventing metastasis and recurrence of triple-negative breast cancer in mice.

BACKGROUND: Seaweed polysaccharides have been recommended as anticancer supplements and for boosting human health; however, their benefits in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) and improving immune surveillance remain unclear. Olaparib is a first-in-class poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. Oligo-Fucoidan, a low-molecular-weight sulfated polysaccharide purified from brown seaweed (Laminaria japonica), exhibits significant bioactivities that may aid in disease management. METHODS: Macrophage polarity, clonogenic assays, cancer stemness properties, cancer cell trajectory, glucose metabolism, the TNBC 4T1 cells and a 4T1 syngeneic mouse model were used to inspect the therapeutic effects of olaparib and Oligo-Fucoidan supplementation on TNBC aggressiveness and microenvironment. RESULTS: Olaparib treatment increased sub-G1 cell death and G2/M arrest in TNBC cells, and these effects were enhanced when Oligo-Fucoidan was added to treat the TNBC cells. The levels of Rad51 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and the activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) facilitate drug resistance and TNBC metastasis. However, the combination of olaparib and Oligo-Fucoidan synergistically reduced Rad51 and PD-L1 levels, as well as the activity of EGFR and AMPK; consistently, TNBC cytotoxicity and stemness were inhibited. Oligo-Fucoidan plus olaparib better inhibited the formation of TNBC stem cell mammospheroids with decreased subpopulations of CD44high/CD24low and EpCAMhigh cells than monotherapy. Importantly, Oligo-Fucoidan plus olaparib repressed the oncogenic interleukin-6 (IL-6)/p-EGFR/PD-L1 pathway, glucose uptake and lactate production. Oligo-Fucoidan induced immunoactive and antitumoral M1 macrophages and attenuated the side effects of olaparib, such as the promotion on immunosuppressive and protumoral M2 macrophages. Furthermore, olaparib plus Oligo-Fucoidan dramatically suppressed M2 macrophage invasiveness and repolarized M2 to the M0-like (F4/80high) and M1-like (CD80high and CD86high) phenotypes. In addition, olaparib- and Oligo-Fucoidan-pretreated TNBC cells resulted in the polarization of M0 macrophages into CD80(+) M1 but not CD163(+) M2 macrophages. Importantly, olaparib supplemented with oral administration of Oligo-Fucoidan in mice inhibited postsurgical TNBC recurrence and metastasis with increased cytotoxic T cells in the lymphatic system and decreased regulatory T cells and M2 macrophages in tumors. CONCLUSION: Olaparib supplemented with natural compound Oligo-Fucoidan is a novel therapeutic strategy for reprogramming cancer stemness, metabolism and the microenvironment to prevent local postsurgical recurrence and distant metastasis. The combination therapy may advance therapeutic efficacy that prevent metastasis, chemoresistance and mortality in TNBC patients.

Grossamide attenuates inflammation by balancing macrophage polarization through metabolic reprogramming of macrophages in mice.

Macrophages exhibited different phenotypes in response to environmental cues. To meet the needs of rapid response to stimuli, M1-activated macrophages preferred glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in mitochondria to quickly produce energy and obtain ample raw materials to support cell activation at the same time. Activated macrophages produced free radicals and cytokines to eradicate pathogens but also induced oxidative damage and enhanced inflammation. Grossamide (GSE), a lignanamide from Polygonum multiflorum Thunb., exhibited notable anti-inflammatory effects. In this study, the potential of GSE on macrophage polarization was explored. GSE significantly down-regulated the levels of M1 macrophage biomarkers (Cd32a, Cd80 and Cd86) while increased the levels of M2 indicators (Cd163, Mrc1 and Socs1), showing its potential to inhibit LPS-induced M1 polarization of macrophages. This ability has close a link to its effect on metabolic reprogramming of macrophage. GSE shunted nitric oxide (NO) production from arginine by up-regulation of arginase and down-regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase, thus attenuated the inhibition of NO on OXPHOS. LPS created three breakpoints in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) cycle of macrophage as evidenced by down-regulated isocitrate dehydrogenase, accumulation of succinate and the inhibited SDH activity, significantly decreased level of oxoglutarate dehydrogenase expression and its substrate α-ketoglutarate. Thus GSE reduced oxidative stress and amended fragmented TCA cycle. As a result, GSE maintained redox (NAD+/NADH) and energy (ATP/ADP) state, reduced extracellular acidification rate and enhanced the oxygen consumption rate. In addition, GSE decreased the release of inflammatory cytokines by inhibiting the activation of the LPS/TLR4/NF-κB pathway. These findings highlighted the central role of immunometabolism of macrophages in its functional plasticity, which invited future study of mode of action of anti-inflammatory drugs from viewpoint of metabolic reprogramming.

Lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription, in patients with pretreated germline BRCA1/2 metastatic breast cancer: results from a phase II basket study.

BACKGROUND: Lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription, has shown preclinical antitumor activity against homologous recombination repair-deficient models and preliminary clinical activity in BRCA1/2 breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II basket multitumor trial (NCT02454972) evaluated lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m2 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks in a cohort of 21 patients with pretreated germline BRCA1/2 breast cancer. Patients with any hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS: Confirmed partial response (PR) was observed in six patients [ORR = 28.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.3% to 52.2%] who had received a median of two prior advanced chemotherapy lines. Lurbinectedin was active in both BRCA mutations: four PRs in 11 patients (36.4%) with BRCA2 and two PRs in 10 patients (20.0%) with BRCA1. Median DoR was 8.6 months, median PFS was 4.1 months and median OS was 16.1 months. Stable disease (SD) was observed in 10 patients (47.6%), including 3 with unconfirmed response in a subsequent tumor assessment [ORR unconfirmed = 42.9% (95% CI 21.8% to 66.0%)]. Clinical benefit rate (PR + SD ≥ 4 months) was 76.2% (95% CI 52.8% to 91.8%). No objective response was observed among patients who had received prior poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were nausea (61.9%), fatigue (38.1%) and vomiting (23.8%). These AEs were mostly grade 1/2. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (42.9%: grade 4, 23.8%: with no febrile neutropenia). CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study met its primary endpoint and showed activity of lurbinectedin in germline BRCA1/2 breast cancer. Lurbinectedin showed a predictable and manageable safety profile. Considering the exploratory aim of this trial as well as previous results in other phase II studies, further development of lurbinectedin in this indication is warranted.

Emerging Role of PARP Inhibitors in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We highlight the clinical development of Poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Approximately 10 to 30% of metastatic prostate cancer patients carry germline or somatic mutations in DNA repair pathways. BRCA2 is the most commonly mutated gene in DNA damage repair pathways. Because of its critical function in homologous recombination repair (HRR) machinery, deleterious BRCA2 mutation enables synthetic lethality to a PARP inhibitor. Olaparib demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with deleterious mutations in HRR-related genes and most clearly in patients with BRCA2 mutations. Olaparib received the US FDA approval or mCRPC patients with a qualifying HRR gene mutation in May 2020. Rucaparib received an accelerated FDA approval for patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated mCRPC based on 43% objective response rate in a phase II study. To expand the application of a PARP inhibitor, several trials have evaluated various combination strategies with an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, immunotherapy, radium-223, and others. While no PARP inhibitor combination regimen has been approved, promising data from a PARP inhibitor and an ASI combination have been reported. PARP inhibitor represents a standard treatment for patient with mCRPC with germline or somatic mutations in BRCA2 and other HRR pathway genes.

Health-related quality of life analysis in ovarian cancer clinical trials involving PARP inhibitors: a critical methodological perspective.

The poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have yielded significant clinical benefits as maintenance therapy in women with newly diagnosed and relapsed platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer. These drugs were approved based on progression-free survival, the primary endpoint of their respective pivotal trials. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and/or patient-reported outcomes were included in these trials as a secondary exploratory endpoint. Nevertheless, many weaknesses in the analysis of HRQoL across these trials can be noticed. Heterogeneity and suboptimal HRQoL analysis in oncology trials contribute to misconceptions about this endpoint among oncologists and prevent quality of life as being an endpoint used for approvals. In this article, we discuss these HRQoL results from a methodological perspective and propose some solutions for improvement that could be used by regulatory and academic institutions running ovarian cancers trials. Notably, we suggest to measure and analyze HRQoL data after disease progression, to focus dedicated papers on the statistical analyses of HRQoL recommended by the SISAQOL consortium (linear mixed model for repeated measures and time-to-event approaches) and to communicate on available guidelines to ensure compliance with best international practices regarding the measurement and analysis of HRQoL.

Efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy for patients with BRCA1/2-mutated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer progressing on olaparib versus placebo maintenance: post-hoc analyses of the SOLO2/ENGOT Ov-21 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the SOLO2 trial (ENGOT Ov-21; NCT01874353), maintenance olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) and BRCA mutation significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and prolonged overall survival (OS). Following disease progression on olaparib, efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy remains unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc hypothesis-generating analysis of SOLO2 data to determine the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens following RECIST disease progression in patients who received olaparib or placebo. We evaluated time to second progression (TTSP) calculated from the date of RECIST progression to the next progression/death. RESULTS: The study population comprised 147 patients who received chemotherapy as their first subsequent treatment after RECIST progression. Of these, 69 (47%) and 78 (53%) were originally randomized to placebo and olaparib arms, respectively. In the placebo-treated cohort, 27/69 and 42/69 received non-platinum and platinum-based chemotherapy, respectively, compared with 24/78 and 54/78, respectively, in the olaparib-treated cohort. Among patients treated with chemotherapy (N = 147), TTSP was significantly longer in the placebo than in the olaparib arm: 12.1 versus 6.9 months [hazard ratio (HR) 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-3.19]. Similar result was obtained on multivariable analysis adjusting for prognostic factors at RECIST progression (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.41-3.22). Among patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 96), TTSP was significantly longer in the placebo arm: 14.3 versus 7.0 months (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.73-4.82). Conversely, among patients treated with non-platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 51), the TTSP was comparable in the placebo and olaparib arms: 8.3 versus 6.0 months (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.86-2.90). CONCLUSIONS: Following progression from maintenance olaparib in the recurrent setting, the efficacy of platinum-based subsequent chemotherapy seems to be reduced in BRCA1/2-mutated patients with PSROC compared to patients not previously receiving poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). The optimal strategy for patients who relapse after PARPi is an area of ongoing research.

Case report: Response to platinum agents and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor in a patient with BRCA1 c.5096G>A (R1699Q) intermediate-risk variant.

BACKGROUND: BRCA1 c.5096G>A (p. Arg1699Gln) (hereinafter BRCA1 R1699Q) is classified as a pathogenic genetic variant despite its lower penetrance of breast and ovarian cancers compared to other BRCA1 variants. However, this mutation is currently reported as a 'special interpretation' variant in the BRACAnalysis® because the response to platinum agents and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors remains unknown in patients with this mutation. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of stage IIIc high-grade primary peritoneal cancer in a 69-year-old woman with germline BRCA1 R1699Q variant. She received platinum-containing chemotherapy followed by surgery. Eight months later, the patient experienced recurrence and received six cycles of chemotherapy and olaparib maintenance therapy. However, the disease progressed after only 5 months, and she received another chemotherapy drug. This patient responded slightly to platinum agents and had shorter progression-free survival on olaparib compared with clinical trial data. myChoice® CDx also showed Genomic Instability Score (GIS) was 50. This patient had no other gene mutations which could cause homologous recombination deficiency. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the clinical outcome of PARP inhibitor and platinum-containing chemotherapy in a patient with a BRCA1 R1699Q variant. Despite BRCA1 mutation and high GIS, used as indicators of drug sensitivity, the recurrent tumor did not respond well to platinum agents and olaparib. BRCA1 R1699Q variant could differ from others in cancer risk and in drug response. Further studies are needed to confirm these observations.