Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 35
Filter
1.
BMC Microbiol ; 21(1): 54, 2021 02 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33602131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical film dressings have been used to obtain skin microbiota for skin microbiome studies, although their adhesive force may be so strong that the skin could be injured when applied to those who have fragile skin, such as older people. Several products with less adhesive force are available, although their applicability for skin microbiome studies remains unknown. This study aimed to test whether the dressings with less adhesive force could be used for amplicon-based skin microbiome studies. A set of three different film dressings, with acrylic, urethane, or silicone adhesive, was applied to the back skin of nine healthy young participants. The copy number of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene, microbial compositions, and alpha and beta diversity indices were analyzed by amplicon analysis of the 16S rRNA gene using next-generation sequencing and were compared among the three film dressings. RESULTS: The dressing with acrylic adhesive yielded the highest copy number of 16S rRNA genes, followed by that with urethane adhesive. The silicone-adhesive dressing yielded a significantly lower copy number of the 16S rRNA gene. The microbial composition of skin microbiota was similar among the three film dressings, although significant differences in the relative abundance of Pseudomonas species and alpha diversity indices were found in the silicone-adhesive dressing. The Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was significantly higher between the acrylic- and silicone-adhesive dressings than between the acrylic- and urethane-adhesive dressings. No adverse effects related to tape stripping were observed for any of the film dressings. CONCLUSION: We recommend dressings with acrylic or urethane adhesive for amplicon-based skin microbiome studies. An acrylic adhesive has an advantage in the yield of skin microbiota, and a urethane adhesive should be chosen when applied to fragile skin. The adhesive force of the dressing with silicone adhesive was too weak to be used for collecting skin microbiota.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Bacteria/genetics , Bandages/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Microbiota/genetics , Skin/microbiology , Acrylates , Adhesives/classification , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bandages/classification , Female , Genetic Variation , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Male , Phylogeny , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Silicones , Urethane , Young Adult
2.
J Avian Med Surg ; 34(3): 268-273, 2020 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33099980

ABSTRACT

Pressure-sensitive adhesive tapes are commonly used for the positioning of birds for radiography and securing bandages. The effect of 5 common tapes on feather structure was investigated with before-and-after comparisons. Each tape demonstrated a characteristic pattern of damage to the feather vane that involved separation of barbules and/or tearing of barbs. Tapes with rigid backing materials and strong adhesives were more likely to cause tearing and barbule separation, respectively, whereas flexible tapes with limited adhesion to feathers were more successful in securing feathers without causing irreparable damage. Consideration should be given to the appropriate selection of tape applied to the feathers of birds to prevent iatrogenic damage to their plumage.


Subject(s)
Adhesives , Birds/injuries , Feathers/injuries , Specimen Handling/veterinary , Adhesives/classification , Adhesives/standards , Animals
3.
Skin Res Technol ; 25(2): 179-186, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30387538

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ostomy barriers are adhesive devices designed to hold pouching systems to the abdomen and protect the peristomal skin from stoma effluent. The objective of this study was to determine differences in the extent of skin trauma resulting from serially applying and removing two types of ostomy barriers. METHODS: The study was a randomized, prospective, repeated measure trial involving healthy volunteers. The ostomy skin barriers were applied to the abdomen and changed every 3-4 days over a 17-day period. Skin observations (erythema, stripping, edge irritation and overall comparisons) were completed by a trained (blinded) observer. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements were completed by a separate (blinded) technician. TEWL was measured in a designated site and again in the most visually traumatized location at termination. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between the two test devices in all assessments but visual observation of erythema. Highly significant differences in TEWL were found between the test products when measured at termination from the most visually traumatized sites. CONCLUSIONS: The ostomy barrier with ceramide was significantly less disruptive to the epidermis than the ostomy barrier without ceramide. TEWL measurements were more sensitive to changes in the barrier function of the skin than visual observation of erythema.


Subject(s)
Ceramides/adverse effects , Erythema/pathology , Ostomy/adverse effects , Skin/injuries , Adhesives/adverse effects , Adhesives/classification , Adult , Epidermis/injuries , Epidermis/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ostomy/nursing , Prospective Studies , Skin/pathology , Water Loss, Insensible/physiology
4.
Mar Biotechnol (NY) ; 21(1): 38-51, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30413912

ABSTRACT

Adhesion in barnacles is still poorly understood. The cement gland secretes an insoluble multi-protein complex, which adheres very strongly to a variety of substrates in the presence of water. This adhesion mechanism is bioinspiring for the engineering of new adhesive materials, but to replicate this adhesive system, the genes coding for the cement constitutive proteins must be identified and elucidated, and their products characterised. Here, the complete sequences of three cement protein (CP) genes (CP-100K, CP-52K, and CP-19K) isolated from the cement gland of the stalked barnacle Pollicipes pollicipes (order Scalpelliformes) were obtained using RACE PCR. The three genes were compared to the 23 other acorn barnacle CP genes so far sequenced (order Sessilia) to determine common and differential patterns and molecular properties, since the adhesives of both orders have visibly different characteristics. A shotgun proteomic analysis was performed on the cement, excreted at the membranous base of specimens, where the products of the three genes sequenced in the gland were identified, validating their function as CPs. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed, to cluster CPs into groups with similar amino acid composition. This analysis uncovered three CP groups, each characterised by similar residue composition, features in secondary structure, and some biochemical properties, including isoelectric point and residue accessibility to solvents. The similarity among proteins in each defined group was low despite comparable amino acid composition. PCA can identify putative adhesive proteins from NGS transcriptomic data regardless of their low homology. This analysis did not highlight significant differences in residue composition between homologous acorn and stalked barnacle CPs. The characteristics responsible for the structural differences between the cement of stalked and acorn barnacles are described, and the presence of nanostructures, such as repetitive homologous domains and low complexity regions, and repetitive ß-sheets are discussed relatively to self-assembly and adhesion.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Arthropod Proteins/chemistry , Proteome/chemistry , Thoracica/chemistry , Adhesives/classification , Adhesives/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Aquatic Organisms , Arthropod Proteins/classification , Arthropod Proteins/genetics , Arthropod Proteins/metabolism , Gene Ontology , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Isoelectric Point , Molecular Sequence Annotation , Principal Component Analysis , Proteome/classification , Proteome/genetics , Proteome/metabolism , Sequence Alignment , Thoracica/genetics , Thoracica/metabolism , Transcriptome
5.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 49(1): 101-4, 2017 02 18.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28203013

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of curing mode of one-step and two-step universal adhesives on the micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) of different dual-cure resin cements to dentin. METHODS: One-step universal adhesive Single Bond Universal (SBU), and two-step universal adhesive OptiBond Versa (VSA) were chosen as the subjects, one-step self-etching adhesive OptiBond All in One (AIO) and two-step self-etching adhesive Clearfil SE Bond (SEB) were control groups, and two dual-cure resin cements RelyX Ultimate (RLX) and Nexus 3 Universal (NX3) were used in this study. In this study, 80 extracted human molars were selected and the dentin surface was exposed using diamond saw. The teeth were divided into 16 groups according to the adhesives (AIO, SBU, SEB, VSA), cure modes of adhesives (light cure, non-light cure) and resin cements (RLX, NX3). The adhesives were applied on the dentin surface following the instruction and whether light cured or not, then the resin cements were applied on the adhesives with 1 mm thickness and light cured (650 mW/cm(2) for 20 s. A resin was built up (5 mm) on the cements and light cured layer by layer. After water storage for 24 h, the specimens were cut into resin-cement-dentin strips with a cross sectional area of 1 mm×1 mm and the µTBS was measured. RESULTS: Regarding one-step universal adhesive (SBU) light cured, the µTBS with RLX [(35.45±7.04) MPa] or NX3 [(26.84±10.39) MPa] were higher than SBU non-light cured with RLX [(17.93±8.93) MPa)] or NX3 [(10.07±5.89) MPa, P<0.001]. Compared with AIO, light-cured SBU combined with RLX presented higher µTBS than AIO group [(35.45±7.04) MPa vs. (24.86±8.42) MPa, P<0.05]. When SBU was not lighted, the µTBS was lower than AIO [(17.93±8.93) MPa vs. (22.28±7.57) MPa, P<0.05]. For two-step universal adhesive (VSA) and control adhesive (SEB), curing mode did not affect the µTBS when used with either RLX or NX3 (25.98-32.24 MPa, P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Curing mode of one-step universal adhesive may affect the µTBS between dual-cure resin cements and dentin, while for two-step universal adhesive, the curing mode and the type of resin cements did not influence the µTBS.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Adhesives/classification , Composite Resins/chemistry , Composite Resins/classification , Dental Bonding/methods , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Dentin-Bonding Agents/classification , Resin Cements/chemistry , Resin Cements/classification , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate , Humans , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Materials Testing/methods , Methacrylates , Self-Curing of Dental Resins/methods , Tensile Strength/drug effects
6.
Gerodontology ; 33(4): 453-460, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25643746

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We developed a new scoring index for assessing the removability of denture adhesives and evaluated the removal efficiency of denture cleaners. BACKGROUND: Although our understanding of the importance of denture care is increasing, little is known about the effectiveness and efficiency of denture cleaners on denture adhesives. Therefore, guidelines for proper cleaning are necessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used five denture cleaner solutions on two cream adhesives, one powder adhesive and one cushion adhesive. After immersion in the denture cleaners for a designated time, we evaluated the area of the sample plate still covered by denture adhesive. RESULTS: Cream adhesives were removed more completely after immersion in majority of the denture cleaners than in water. Powder adhesive was removed more quickly than cream adhesives. Cushion adhesive was not removed by immersion in either the denture cleaners or water control. CONCLUSION: Some denture cleaners could liquefy cream adhesives more than water, but these differences were not observed in case of powder and cushion adhesives.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Denture Cleansers/standards , Dentures , Adhesives/classification , Denture Retention , Humans , Water
7.
Curr Drug Deliv ; 12(2): 139-56, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25911164

ABSTRACT

Mucoadhesion can be defined as adhesion in biological setting. Process of mucoadhesion takes place in 3 stages- the first stage being that of wetting or swelling of mucoadhesive polymer. Second stage involves interpenetration of the chains of mucoadhesive polymer and the third stage involves formation of chemical bonds between entangled chains. Several polymer related factors like molecular weight, chain length, degree of cross-linking, hydration, functional groups, charge, polymer concentration and several environmental and physiological factors like contact time, mucin turnover rate and mucus viscosity affect the degree of mucoadhesion. Formulation scientists have structured and engineered several mucoadhesive polymers for their usefulness in enhancement of bioavailability, controlled and targeted drug delivery. Mucoadhesive polymers can be classified as non-specific first generation polymers and novel second generation polymers based on the mechanism of mucoadhesion. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems have been applied to buccal cavity, oesophagus, gastrointestinal tract, eye, nasal cavity, vagina and rectal cavity. Several in vitro/ex vivo and in vivo evaluation techniques have evolved for the evaluation of mucoadhesive strength of these polymers. This review provides historical perspective on mucoadhesive polymers and an understanding of the phenomenon of mucoadhesion, factors affecting mucoadhesion, types of mucoadhesive polymers, their practical applications and the various evaluation techniques for determination of mucoadhesive strength.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Polymers/chemistry , Adhesives/classification , Chemical Phenomena , Humans , Polymers/classification
8.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 2013: 626103, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24222742

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to measure the shear bond strength of different adhesive systems to Biodentine with different time intervals. Eighty specimens of Biodentine were prepared and divided into 8 groups. After 12 minutes, 40 samples were randomly selected and divided into 4 groups of 10 each: group 1: (etch-and-rinse adhesive system) Prime & Bond NT; group 2: (2-step self-etch adhesive system) Clearfil SE Bond; group 3: (1-step self-etch adhesive systems) Clearfil S(3) Bond; group 4: control (no adhesive). After the application of adhesive systems, composite resin was applied over Biodentine. This procedure was repeated 24 hours after mixing additional 40 samples, respectively. Shear bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine, and the data were subjected to 1-way analysis of variance and Scheffé post hoc test. No significant differences were found between all of the adhesive groups at the same time intervals (12 minutes and 24 hours) (P > .05). Among the two time intervals, the lowest value was obtained for group 1 (etch-and-rinse adhesive) at a 12-minute period, and the highest was obtained for group 2 (two-step self-etch adhesive) at a 24-hour period. The placement of composite resin used with self-etch adhesive systems over Biodentine showed better shear bond strength.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Calcium Compounds/chemistry , Silicates/chemistry , Adhesiveness , Adhesives/classification , Composite Resins/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical
9.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom ; 25(11): 1631-40, 2011 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21594939

ABSTRACT

Proteomics techniques are increasingly applied for the identification of protein binders in historical paints. The complex nature of paint samples, with different kinds of pigments mixed into, and degradation by long term exposure to light, humidity and temperature variations, requires solid analysis and interpretation methods. In this study matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectra of tryptic-digested paint replicas are subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) and soft independent modelling of class analogy (SIMCA) in order to distinguish proteinaceous binders based on animal glues, egg white, egg yolk and milk casein from each other. The most meaningful peptide peaks for a given protein class will be determined, and if possible, annotated with their corresponding amino acid sequence. The methodology was subsequently applied on egg temperas, as well as on animal glues from different species. In the latter small differences in the MALDI-TOF mass spectra can allow the determination of a mammal or sturgeon origin of the glue. Finally, paint samples from the 16(th) century altarpiece of St Margaret of Antioch (Mlynica, Slovakia) were analysed. Several expected peaks are either present in lower abundance or completely missing in these natural aged paints, due to degradation of the paints. In spite of this mammalian glue was identified in the St Margaret samples.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Paint/analysis , Paint/history , Principal Component Analysis/methods , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/methods , Adhesives/classification , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Art , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Egg Proteins/analysis , Egg Proteins/chemistry , Fishes , History, 16th Century , Mammals , Models, Chemical , Molecular Sequence Data , Proteins/analysis , Proteins/chemistry , Proteomics
11.
Compend Contin Educ Dent ; 29(4): 208-15; quiz 216, 218, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18524205

ABSTRACT

Adhesive procedures are essential to most restorative protocols used in modern dentistry. Increasing demand and constant interest in new products have stimulated dental manufacturers to produce new adhesive systems and marketing campaigns that announce fast and easy bonding. However, laboratorial and clinical studies show that, usually, ease of application of an adhesive system does not relate to its competence in creating a quality, long-term adhesive interface. This article will present relevant data from the scientific literature to help clinicians understand quality adhesion and achieve excellent results with the current adhesion systems.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Dental Materials/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Adhesives/classification , Adhesives/radiation effects , Collagen/ultrastructure , Composite Resins/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Dental Materials/classification , Dental Materials/radiation effects , Dentin/ultrastructure , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Dentin-Bonding Agents/radiation effects , Humans , Hydrolysis , Light , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Polymers/chemistry , Polymers/radiation effects , Resins, Synthetic/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Time Factors , Water/chemistry
13.
Dent Mater ; 22(6): 533-44, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16300826

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: One-step self-etch adhesives are undoubtedly the most user-friendly adhesives, but have been associated with lower bonding effectiveness as compared to two-step and three-step adhesives. Conversion of a one-step self-etch system into a two-step self-etch adhesive by adding a bonding step, or into a three-step etch&rinse adhesive by adding a beforehand etching step and a bonding step might be tempting in order to improve bond strength. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate whether adding application steps influences the bond strength of a one-step self-etch adhesive. METHODS: In this study, the bonding effectiveness of two experimental one-step self-etch adhesives and three different commercial adhesives to enamel and dentin was determined using a micro-tensile bond-strength protocol. This procedure was repeated for the experimental adhesives transformed into two-step self-etch and three-step etch&rinse adhesives. In addition, their interaction with tooth tissue was investigated using TEM and Feg-SEM. RESULTS: Transforming a one-step into a two-step self-etch adhesive did improve the bond strength to enamel and dentin, though not significantly. By adding a preceding etching step, the bond strength to enamel was significantly improved, but that to dentin was decreased considerably. The latter must be attributed to hampered resin infiltration of the one-step self-etch adhesive within the relatively deeply exposed collagen fibril network. SIGNIFICANCE: Additional application of a hydrophobic bonding agent slightly improved bonding effectiveness. Adding a preceding etching step is beneficial for enamel but should be avoided for dentin as this will decrease bond strengths, and may even jeopardize the bonding durability.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding/methods , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Acetone/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental , Adhesives/chemistry , Adhesives/classification , Collagen/ultrastructure , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Dentin/ultrastructure , Dentin-Bonding Agents/classification , Ethanol/chemistry , Humans , Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions , Materials Testing , Methacrylates/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Organophosphonates/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Solvents/chemistry , Tensile Strength , Tricarboxylic Acids/chemistry
14.
Dent Mater J ; 24(1): 1-13, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15881200

ABSTRACT

Besides micro-mechanical interlocking through hybrid-layer formation, self-etch adhesives may benefit from additional chemical interaction between the functional monomer and residual hydroxyapatite. One-step adhesives are commonly associated with lower bonding effectiveness, which must be attributed in part to the dissolution of hydrophilic and hydrophobic monomers in a relatively highly concentrated solvent. In this 'difficult' mixture, also water is essential as ionization medium to enable self-etching activity. Due to the high hydrophilicity, one-step self-etch adhesives have been reported to behave as semi-permeable membranes, allowing fluids to pass through and seriously jeopardizing bond durability. Recent research has also revealed that HEMA-free one-step adhesives are prone to phase-separation, which may also account for their lower bonding effectiveness. Employing an appropriate air-drying technique may, however, improve the bonding effectiveness of such phase-separating adhesives by getting rid of substantially more interfacial water than HEMA-containing adhesives, of which water might be more difficult to remove from.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Dental Bonding/methods , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental , Adhesives/classification , Dental Enamel Permeability , Dentin Permeability , Methacrylates/chemistry , Wetting Agents/chemistry
15.
J Dent Res ; 84(2): 118-32, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15668328

ABSTRACT

The immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary adhesives is quite favorable, regardless of the approach used. In the long term, the bonding effectiveness of some adhesives drops dramatically, whereas the bond strengths of other adhesives are more stable. This review examines the fundamental processes that cause the adhesion of biomaterials to enamel and dentin to degrade with time. Non-carious class V clinical trials remain the ultimate test method for the assessment of bonding effectiveness, but in addition to being high-cost, they are time- and labor-consuming, and they provide little information on the true cause of clinical failure. Therefore, several laboratory protocols were developed to predict bond durability. This paper critically appraises methodologies that focus on chemical degradation patterns of hydrolysis and elution of interface components, as well as mechanically oriented test set-ups, such as fatigue and fracture toughness measurements. A correlation of in vitro and in vivo data revealed that, currently, the most validated method to assess adhesion durability involves aging of micro-specimens of biomaterials bonded to either enamel or dentin. After about 3 months, all classes of adhesives exhibited mechanical and morphological evidence of degradation that resembles in vivo aging effects. A comparison of contemporary adhesives revealed that the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives remain the 'gold standard' in terms of durability. Any kind of simplification in the clinical application procedure results in loss of bonding effectiveness. Only the two-step self-etch adhesives approach the gold standard and do have some additional clinical benefits.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Materials Testing , Adhesives/classification , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Biocompatible Materials/classification , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Cements/classification , Dental Enamel/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis , Dentin/chemistry , Humans
16.
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll ; 46(3): 43-9, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16598180

ABSTRACT

Length of resin tags yielded by utilization of an one-step conventional adhesive system and self-etching adhesive system on unground enamel was observed. In study Groups I and III, the enamel surface was etched for 60 seconds with 35% phosphoric acid gel and adhesive systems PQ1 (Ultradent Products, Inc) and Adper Prompt L Pop (3M/ESPE) were applied. Adper Prompt L Pop (3M/ESPE) was also applied in Group II in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. After application of these adhesive systems to dental enamel, specimens were prepared for light microscopy analysis to ascertain degree of penetration (x400). The results were submitted to an analysis of variance at the 5% level; whenever there was significance, the Tukey test was applied at the 5% level. It was found that acid etching prior to application of conventional and self-etching adhesive materials provided higher penetration of the adhesive into the unground enamel surface compared to that achieved solely by application of self-etching adhesive.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Acid Etching, Dental , Adhesives/chemistry , Adhesives/classification , Adolescent , Adult , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Cements/classification , Dental Prophylaxis , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Humans , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Surface Properties
17.
Dent Clin North Am ; 48(3): 721-33, vii, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15261802

ABSTRACT

An attempt has been made to present an overview of this controversial topic of over-the-counter denture adherents. The proper use of a denture adhesive can truly provide both dentist and patient with a means of securing a prosthesis despite the practitioner's best efforts. It is through a thorough knowledge of the attributes and limitations of these products that the dental profession can better guide patients in the management of their prosthesis.


Subject(s)
Adhesives , Dental Materials , Denture Retention , Adhesives/chemistry , Adhesives/classification , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Materials/classification , Humans , Nonprescription Drugs/chemistry
19.
Orthod Fr ; 73(1): 39-58, 2002 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11987530

ABSTRACT

Today, manufacturers provide the orthodontist with a range of adhesive systems which is so wide that is often difficult for the orthodontist to make his choice between them. The adhesive systems fall into four categories: traditional hydrophobic bonding systems, hydrophilic bonding systems, self-etching bonding systems, resin-modified glass ionomer-cements. This article will attempt to examine the first three categories which correspond to those of the composite bonding systems. Following a presentation of bonding assembling and of the required specification of the bonding systems used in orthodontic practice, the three composite bonding systems will be examined along with their advantages/disadvantages before a closing description of the corresponding clinical protocol to be followed. Whenever one of our laboratory experiments enables us to provide experimental evidence, a presentation is made within the related chapters.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental , Adhesives/chemistry , Adhesives/classification , Composite Resins/classification , Cuspid , Dental Bonding , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Humans , Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions , Light , Materials Testing , Orthodontic Appliances , Polymers/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Surface Properties , Tooth Movement Techniques/instrumentation , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Tooth, Impacted/therapy , Water/chemistry
20.
Pediatr Dent ; 24(6): 587-93, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12528954

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro microleakage of fourth-generation filled and unfilled adhesive resin systems with fifth-generation filled and unfilled adhesive resin systems in both primary and permanent teeth. METHODS: Eighty extracted or exfoliated human noncarious teeth (40 primary and 40 permanent) were assigned to each of 8 groups. Groups 1, 3, 5 and 7 were primary teeth, and groups 2, 4, 6 and 8 contained permanent teeth. Groups 1 and 2 were bonded with Optibond Fl (Kerr), groups 3 and 4 with Scotchbond Multipurpose (3M), groups 5 and 6 with Optibond Solo Plus (Kerr) and groups 7 and 8 with Single Bond (3M). All teeth received a Class V cavity preparation, and the cavosurface margins were placed entirely in enamel. They were then restored with TPH Spectrum Shade Al (Dentsply Caulk). All teeth were thermocycled, stained with basic fuchsin, sectioned and viewed under the microscope. Measurements were recorded in absolute millimeters and relative grades as judged by 2 evaluators. RESULTS: No significant difference in microleakage was observed between fourth- and fifth-generation adhesive resin systems, whether filled or unfilled, or applied on primary or permanent teeth. Significant differences were found in the amount of microleakage at the gingival and occlusal surfaces in all groups. One-bottle, fifth-generation adhesive resin systems permit easier application with the same effectives as the 2-bottle, fourth-generation systems. CONCLUSIONS: One-bottle, fifth-generation adhesive resin systems permit easier application with the same effectiveness as the 2-bottle, fourth-gerenration systems.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Dental Enamel/pathology , Dental Leakage/classification , Resin Cements/chemistry , Tooth, Deciduous/pathology , Adhesives/chemistry , Adhesives/classification , Analysis of Variance , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Cavity Preparation/classification , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Humans , Materials Testing , Observer Variation , Resin Cements/classification , Rosaniline Dyes , Statistics as Topic , Thermodynamics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...