Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 393
Filter
1.
Psicothema (Oviedo) ; 36(2): 103-112, 2024. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-VR-32

ABSTRACT

Background: Internationally adopted children who suffered early institutionalization are at risk of a late onset of internalizing problems in adolescence. Both pre-adoption, adversity-related, and post-adoption factors predict variability in internalizing problems in this population. Previous studies have suggested different patterns of parent- adolescent informant discrepancies in adoptive dyads. Method: We analyzed internalizing problems among 66 adolescents internationally adopted from Russia to Spanish families using both the parent- and self-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and comparing them with a low-risk, community group (n = 30). We assessed pre-adoption and post-adoption factors and evaluated cross-informant discrepancies. Results: Internationally adopted adolescents exhibited more internalizing problems by parent-report than community adolescents, but there were no differences by self-report. Adopted youth showed no discrepancies between parent and self-report, whereas community adolescents reported more internalizing symptoms than their parents. Pre-adoption adversity-related factors predicted parent-reported internalizing problems, while post-adoption factors predicted self-reported internalizing problems. Conclusions: Parent-adolescent informant discrepancies in adopted adolescents from Eastern Europe for internalizing symptoms were lower than in community adolescents. Both adversity-related factors and the lived experience of adoption may influence the development of internalizing symptoms in internationally adopted adolescents.(AU)


Antecedentes: Los niños y niñas adoptados internacionalmente están en riesgo de desarrollar problemas emocionales en la adolescencia. Factores relacionados con la adversidad y con procesos post-adopción predicen variabilidad en problemas internalizantes en esta población. Estudios previos sugieren también diferentes patrones de discrepancias entre informantes en diadas adoptivas. Método: Analizamos los problemas internalizantes en 66 adolescentes adoptados de Rusia a familias españolas, usando el Cuestionario de Capacidades y Fortalezas y comparándoles con un grupo adolescentes de la comunidad (n = 30). Evaluamos factores pre- y post-adopción y discrepancias entre informantes (autoinforme e informe parental). Resultados: Los adolescentes adoptados mostraron más problemas internalizantes por informe parental que los adolescentes comunitarios, pero no hubo diferencias por autoinforme. En el grupo adoptado no hubo discrepancias entre informantes, mientras que el grupo de comparación reportó más síntomas internalizantes que sus progenitores. Factores relacionados con la adversidad predijeron problemas internalizantes por informe parental, mientras que factores post-adopción predijeron problemas internalizantes por autoinforme. Conclusiones: Las discrepancias entre informantes en problemas internalizantes fueron menores en adolescentes adoptados que en adolescentes de la comunidad. Tanto factores relacionados con laadversidad como con la vivencia de la adopción pueden influir en el desarrollo de problemas internalizantes en adolescentes adoptados internacionalmente.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Psychology, Adolescent , Adolescent Behavior , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Adoption/psychology , Russia , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Child Abuse Negl ; 140: 106124, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36966592

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Illegal adoption, which mainly includes child trafficking and informal adoption, has long been a prevalent social issue in China. However, the processes and patterns of illegal adoption are not well understood due to the scarcity of data. OBJECTIVE: The findings are expected to provide insightful clues for the government and the public to better understand the two categories of illegal adoption. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: This study included 4296 trafficking cases and 4499 informal adoption cases between 1949 and 2018. The data came from the 'Baby Coming Back Home' (https://www.baobeihuijia.com) website, which is the most comprehensive commonweal forum established by nongovernmental volunteers for finding missing persons in China. METHODS: Mathematical statistics and hot spot analysis were used to visualize the spatiotemporal pattern of illegal adoption. RESULTS: Child trafficking and informal adoption show opposite gender preferences and different age gradients. The numbers of both cases peaked in the early 1990s and then dropped. More than 50 % of all trafficked children were male, whereas approximately 83 % cases of informal adoption were female between 1980 and 2000. Hot spots of illegal adoption have shifted from the cities of the Huai River Basin to the southeastern coastal cities over time, 39.40 % of trafficking cases occurred in rural residential areas, and 52.45 % of informal adoption cases were observed in hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Child trafficking and informal adoption are two different ways of adopting children in China. The combination of the one-child policy and the traditional culture of son preference shaped the different characteristics of the illegal adoption of children during a critical period.


Subject(s)
Adoption , Human Trafficking , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , China , Cities , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence
3.
Rev. abordagem gestál. (Impr.) ; 27(3): 306-315, set.-dez. 2021. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, Index Psychology - journals | ID: biblio-1340875

ABSTRACT

Este artigo teórico possui como temática o estágio de convivência em casos de adoção, etapa obrigatória em lei na qual crianças aptas para adoção passam a conviver com candidatos habilitados para tal, visando discutir a filiação adotiva e como ela pode ocorrer nesse período. Legalmente, esse momento deve ser acompanhado por equipe psicossocial, sendo emitido parecer técnico sobre o caso. Mas, o que acontece nesse processo? O que deverá ser observado? Uma revisão bibliográfica em três Bancos de Dados concluiu que as produções sobre a temática são insipientes, especialmente do ponto de vista da Fenomenologia. Durante o estágio de convivência, é comum que os pretendentes a pais tentem agradar a criança ou temam sua história, bem como esta pode tentar agradar ou testar os limites. Acompanhar esse período e discutir essas questões possibilita que todos habitem esse lar e essas relações, contribuindo para maior segurança na concretização da adoção.


This theoretical article has as its theme the stage of cohabitation in cases of adoption, a mandatory step in law in which children suitable for adoption pass to live with qualified candidates. It aimed to discuss adoptive filiation and how it occurs in the stage of cohabitation. Legally, this moment must be accompanied by psychosocial team that delivers technical opinion about it. But what happens in this process? What should be observed? A bibliographical review in three Databases concluded that productions on the subject are insipient, especially from the point of view of the Phenomenology. During the cohabitation stage, it's common for parents to try to please the child, or to fear their history, as well as the child try to please or to test limits. Following this period and discussing these issues enables everyone to inhabit this home and these relationships, contributing to greater security in the adoption implementation.


Este artículo teórico posee como temática la etapa de convivencia en casos de adopción, etapa obligatoria en ley en la que niños aptos para la adopción pasan a convivir con candidatos habilitados para tal, buscando discutir la afiliación adoptiva y cómo puede ocurrir en ese período. Legalmente, ese momento debe ser acompañado por equipo psicosocial, siendo emitido dictamen técnico sobre el caso. Pero, ¿qué sucede en este proceso? ¿Qué debe observarse? Una revisión bibliográfica en tres Bases de datos concluyó que las producciones sobre la temática son insípidas, especialmente desde el punto de vista de la Fenomenología. Durante la etapa de convivencia, es común que los pretendientes a padres traten de agradar al niño o teman su historia, así como ésta puede tratar de agradar o probar los límites. Acompañar ese período y discutir esas cuestiones posibilita que todos habite ese hogar y esas relaciones, contribuyendo para mayor seguridad en la concreción de la adopción.


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adolescent , Adoption/psychology , Family Relations/psychology , Child, Adopted/psychology , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Object Attachment
4.
Article in Spanish | InstitutionalDB, BINACIS, UNISALUD | ID: biblio-1293283

ABSTRACT

Distintos aspectos del régimen de adopción en Argentina, donde rige la Ley 26.061 "Protección Integral sobre los Derechos de las Niñas, Niños y Adolescentes" (2005), y el Código Civil y Comercial contempla la solicitud de declaración de adoptabilidad de niños, niñas y adolescentes como una medida de último término, cuando se hubieren agotado sus posibilidades de permanencia con su familia de origen o en hogares convivenciales.


Subject(s)
Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Adoption/psychology , Family/psychology , Child Advocacy/trends , Child, Institutionalized/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Welfare/psychology , Child Welfare/trends , Family Relations/psychology
6.
Child Maltreat ; 25(3): 328-338, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31610696

ABSTRACT

The present study is the largest and most rigorous study to date on the effects of being appointed a Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) on permanency outcomes of children in foster care. The intent-to-treat study accounts for selection bias by applying inverse probability weighting to logistic and sequential logistic regressions in a large sample of children in foster care in the state of Texas (N = 31,754). Overall, children appointed a CASA have significantly lower odds than children without a CASA of achieving permanency. They have lower odds of being reunified, greater odds of being adopted (if not reunified), and lower odds of being placed in permanent kin guardianship (if not reunified or adopted) than children who are not appointed CASA. This study makes an additional contribution by looking beyond the aggregate effect of CASA on permanency by examining the effect of CASA for different age groups and different types of first placement after removal.


Subject(s)
Child Custody/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Protective Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Foster Home Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Child , Child Custody/statistics & numerical data , Child Protective Services/statistics & numerical data , Child Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Female , Foster Home Care/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Social Work/legislation & jurisprudence , Texas
7.
Sex., salud soc. (Rio J.) ; (33): 273-294, set.-dez. 2019.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1059087

ABSTRACT

Resumo Este artigo tem por objetivo refletir sobre a Lei 13.509/17 que dispõe sobre adoção e altera a Lei 8.069/90 (Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente). Desejo entender quais os sentidos sobre adoção, filiação, exercício parental, famílias, práticas de justiça e políticas públicas que organizaram a promulgação desta lei. Em que medida a filiação adotiva pode estar sendo contemplada como uma política pública para a infância e a juventude? Será que a aposta na diminuição do tempo de um processo pode estar conectada à ideia de que adoção é solução do problema de crianças e jovens que são, em caráter protetivo, afastados de suas famílias de origem? Almejo analisar estas questões a partir do texto da lei, bem como por meio de debates públicos em revistas, jornais e outras mídias sobre o tema emitidos por profissionais ligados à Justiça da Infância e da Juventude.


Abstract This academic article aims to discuss the Law 13,509/17, which provides for adoption and amends the Law 8.069/90 (also known as "Statute of the Children and the Adolescents"). My goal is to understand the meanings associated with adoption, parental exercise, families, justice practices and public policies (related to the referred Law's promulgation). How can an adoptive filiation be considered a public policy for children? May the time reduction of a process be connected to the idea of an adoption as a solution for children's issues in a protective way, as these ones are away from their families of origin? This piece aims to analyze these issues according to the Law's perspective, as well as through public debates on the subject, disclosed by professionals related to the Justice of Childhood and Youth (sources: magazines, newspapers and other media).


Resumen Este artículo tiene como objetivo reflexionar sobre la Ley 13.509/17, que establece la adopción y modifica la Ley 8.069/90 (Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente). Quiero entender cuáles son los significados de adopción, afiliación, crianza de los hijos, familias, prácticas de justicia y políticas públicas que se han organizado para promulgar esta Ley. ¿En qué medida se puede contemplar la membresía como una política pública para la infancia y la juventud? ¿Podría la apuesta por reducir el tiempo de un proceso estar relacionada con la idea de que la adopción es una solución al problema de los niños y jóvenes que, de manera protectora, son retirados de sus familias de origen? Mi objetivo es analizar estos temas a partir del texto de la Ley, así como a través de debates públicos sobre el tema en revistas, periódicos y otros medios emitidos por profesionales vinculados a la Justicia de la Infancia y la Juventud.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Public Policy , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Family , Parenting , Child, Adopted , Legislation as Topic , Brazil , Child Advocacy
8.
Cuad. bioét ; 30(99): 187-198, mayo-ago. 2019.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-185234

ABSTRACT

El derecho español, artículo 177 del Código Civil, y el Convenio Europeo de adopción de menores requieren para la validez del consentimiento de la madre el transcurso, tras el parto, de seis semanas, en garantía de su libertad, consciencia y adecuada información. En contraste en los contratos de vientres de alquiler la mujer contratada en la gestación debe dar su consentimiento irrevocable de entrega del niño al nacer, ex ante del proceso, desprotegiéndola: impidiendo la revocación de su (aparente) voluntad inicial al concluir la gestación y conocer a su hijo ya nacido. Además de la ilicitud del objeto de este contrato, pese a la existencia de derecho que lo positivice, debe considerarse el consentimiento prestado nulo de pleno derecho


Spanish law, article 177 of the Civil Code, and the European Convention on the minors’ adoption require for the validity of the mother ́s consent, the passing of six weeks after the birth, as a guarantee of her freedom, consciousness and adequate information. In contrast, in the agreements of surrogate mother, the woman contracted for the pregnancy must give her irrevocable consent to give the child at birth, ex ante the process, leaving her unprotected: preventing the revocation of her (apparent) initial choice at the end of the pregnancy and knowing her child already born. In addition to the illegality of the object of this contract, despite the existence of a law that makes it positive, the consent given must be considered null and void


Subject(s)
Humans , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Personhood , Contracts/legislation & jurisprudence , Confidentiality/ethics , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Contract Liability
9.
Cuad Bioet ; 30(99): 187-198, 2019.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31206298

ABSTRACT

Spanish law, article 177 of the Civil Code, and the European Convention on the minors' adoption require for the validity of the mother's consent, the passing of six weeks after the birth, as a guarantee of her freedom, consciousness and adequate information. In contrast, in the agreements of surrogate mother, the woman contracted for the pregnancy must give her irrevocable consent to give the child at birth, ex ante the process, leaving her unprotected: preventing the revocation of her (apparent) initial choice at the end of the pregnancy and knowing her child already born. In addition to the illegality of the object of this contract, despite the existence of a law that makes it positive, the consent given must be considered null and void.


Subject(s)
Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Contracts/legislation & jurisprudence , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans
12.
Estud. psicol. (Natal) ; 23(4): 392-403, out.-dez. 2018. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, Index Psychology - journals | ID: biblio-1090307

ABSTRACT

Este estudo teve como objetivo compreender como os profissionais que atuam no Sistema de Justiça experienciam a prática de avaliação e habilitação para adoção por casais do mesmo sexo. Foram entrevistados 27 profissionais (dois juízes, três promotores, 11 psicólogas e 11 assistentes sociais) atuantes em 10 Comarcas de três estados brasileiros, sendo os dados submetidos à análise de conteúdo e interpretados pela teoria bioecológica. Segundo os profissionais, a procura desse público é crescente, no entanto, muitos pretendentes ainda se apresentam sozinhos, por receio ou desconhecimento de que a adoção conjunta é possível. Os casos deferidos foram de casais que compartilhavam o projeto parental e apresentavam uma rede de apoio favorável, enquanto os indeferidos se remetiam, sobretudo, àqueles que insistiam em manter em segredo sua orientação sexual ou seu companheiro(a), e quando não houve adaptação pretendentes-criança. Ressaltaram-se as experiências como positivas nas atuações e intervenções seguintes.


This research aimed to understand how professionals working in the Justice System experienced the practice of evaluation and qualification for adoption by same-sex couples. Twenty-seven professionals (two judges, three prosecutors, 11 psychologists and 11 social workers) working in 10 counties of three Brazilian states were interviewed, the data was submitted to content analysis and interpreted by the bioecological theory. According to the professionals, the demand of this group is increasing, however, many applicants still present themselves without their partners, out of fear or unawareness that joint adoption is possible. The accepted cases were from couples who shared the parental project and owned a favorable support network, while the rejected ones referred, above all, to those who insisted on keeping their sexual orientation or their partner a secret, and when there was no applicants-child adaptation. The experiences were emphasized as positives in the following interventions.


Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comprender cómo los profesionales que actúan en en el Sistema de Justiciaexperimentan la práctica de evaluación y habilitación para la adopción por parejas del mismo sexo. Se entrevistó a 27 profesionales (dos jueces, tres promotores, 11 psicólogas y 11 asistentes sociales) actuantes en 10 Comarcas de tres estados brasileños, siendo los datos sometidos al análisis de contenido e interpretados por la teoría bioecológica. Según los profesionales, la demanda de ese público es creciente, sin embargo, muchos pretendientes todavía se presentan solos, por temor o desconocimiento de que la adopción conjunta es posible. Los casos deferidos fueron de parejas que compartían el proyecto parental y presentaban una red de apoyo favorable, mientras que los rechazados se referían, sobre todo, a aquellos que insistían en mantener en secreto su orientación sexual o su compañero (a), y cuando no hubo adaptación entre los pretendientes y los nuños. Se resalta las experiencias como positivas en las actuaciones e intervenciones siguientes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Adoption/psychology , Homosexuality , Legal Process , Brazil , Justice Administration System , Qualitative Research , Social Workers
13.
Fed Regist ; 83(43): 9208-13, 2018 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29969204

ABSTRACT

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) amends its regulation to provide for reimbursement of qualifying adoption expenses incurred by a veteran with a service-connected disability that results in the inability of the veteran to procreate without the use of fertility treatment. Under the Continuing Appropriations and Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, and Zika Response and Preparedness Act, VA may use funds appropriated or otherwise made available to VA for the "Medical Services" account to provide adoption reimbursement to these veterans. Under the law, reimbursement may be for the adoption-related expenses for an adoption that is finalized after the date of the enactment of this Act under the same terms as apply under the adoption reimbursement program of the Department of Defense (DoD), as authorized in DoD Instruction 1341.09, including the reimbursement limits and requirements set forth in such instruction. This rulemaking implements the new adoption reimbursement benefit for covered veterans.


Subject(s)
Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Benefits/economics , Insurance Benefits/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Disability/economics , Insurance, Disability/legislation & jurisprudence , Veterans/legislation & jurisprudence , Child , Humans , United States
15.
Pensando fam ; 22(1): 118-130, jan.-jun. 2018.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-955236

ABSTRACT

Esse artigo visa discutir as questões de vinculação no processo de adoção estrangeira inter-racial segundo um estudo reflexivo teórico; tomando por base a análise documental de uma notícia veiculada na mídia brasileira a respeito de uma adoção nessa modalidade por um casal de atores. A adoção inter-racial continua necessitando de investigações com o intuito de desmitificar preconceitos e transpor barreiras entre as diferentes etnias, além de possibilitar um lugar de reconhecimento para a família multirracial. A psicanálise vincular mostrou-se de grande contribuição, sobretudo por propor um novo entendimento dos processos interpsíquicos envolvendo sujeito e família, bem como a formação de vínculos entre eles. Conclui-se, nesse caso ilustrativo, apesar das diferenças étnico-culturais, há uma possibilidade de remalhagem dos laços vinculares, uma vez que é outorgado à criança adotada um lugar no desejo daqueles que a adotam. Assim, o pertencimento é construído sobre a primazia afetiva e respeitando a alteridade.(AU)


This article aims discusses the linkage issues arising from interracial foreign adoption process a throughout theoretical study, based on news from the Brazilian media regarding the adoption under said modality by a couple of actors. The interracial adoption still needs further investigation to demystify prejudices and overcome barriers among different ethnicities, as well as to provide a place of recognition for the multiracial family. Linkage psychoanalysis has shown a significant value, especially because it allows a new understanding of the inter-psychic processes that take place between the individual and the family, as well as the formation of links between them. In conclusion, in this illustrative case, there is a possibility of remolding the family bonds, despite the ethnic-cultural differences, once it is given to the adoptive child a place in the desire of the parents. Thus, the belonging is built on affective primacy and respecting the altherity.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Advocacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Internationality/legislation & jurisprudence , Brazil , Africa
16.
Rev. derecho genoma hum ; (48): 133-157, ene.-jun. 2018.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-189567

ABSTRACT

La Suprema Corte de Brasil decidió que la paternidad socioafectiva, declarada o no en el registro público, no impide el reconocimiento del vínculo de filiación concomitante basado en el origen biológico, con los resultantes efectos jurídicos patrimoniales y extrapatrimoniales. Así, la más alta Corte brasileña reconoció la posibilidad jurídica de la multiparentalidad


Brazilian Supreme Court has ruled that social parenthood, declared or not in civil registry, does not prevent the recognition of concomitant filiation based on biological origin with the consequent patrimonial and extrapatrimonial legal effects. Thus, the highest Brazilian Court recognized the legal possibility of multiple parenthood


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Parenting/trends , Family Characteristics , Paternity , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Consanguinity , DNA Footprinting/trends , Family Relations/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Change , Parent-Child Relations/legislation & jurisprudence , Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence
18.
Psico USF ; 23(3): 497-511, 2018. tab, fig
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-948249

ABSTRACT

Este estudo teve por objetivo compreender de que modo a avaliação de pretendentes à adoção no contexto brasileiro vem sendo abordada, descrita e problematizada na literatura científica, por meio de uma revisão integrativa. A partir de critérios preestabelecidos, nas bases SciELO, PePSIC, LILACS e PsycINFO (2006-2016), foram recuperados 30 estudos, analisados pela estratégia PRISMA. Predominam estudos empíricos, de caráter qualitativo, com instrumentos e amostras variados. Em geral, os estudos discutem uma cultura da adoção em que a criança é reconhecida como protagonista, bem como diferentes configurações familiares que ganham visibilidade e buscam legitimidade. Apenas oito estudos permitem a visualização de instrumentos / técnicas, desafios, recomendações e críticas presentes no processo avaliativo. No entanto, em nenhum momento a avaliação de pretendentes é foco de problematização, limitando compreensões acerca da prática profissional e sugerindo tratar-se de uma análise subjetiva pelos aspectos abstratos que abarca. Investigações futuras acerca dos atores envolvidos nos bastidores da adoção são sugeridas. (AU)


The aim of this study was to understand how the evaluation of applicants for adoption in the Brazilian context has been approached, described and problematized in the scientific literature, by means of an integrative review. Based on pre-established criteria, 30 studies were retrieved in the SciELO, PePSIC, LILACS and PsycINFO databases (2006-2016) and analyzed by the PRISMA strategy. Empirical studies of qualitative character predominate, with varied instruments and samples, and which, in general, discuss a culture of adoption in which the child is recognized as the protagonist, as well as different family configurations gain visibility and seek legitimacy. Only eight studies allow the visualization of instruments/techniques, challenges, recommendations and criticisms present in the evaluation process. However, the evaluation of applicants does not appear as a focus of problematization in the studies, limiting comprehension about professional practice and suggesting that it is a subjective analysis by the aspects it encompasses. Further studies on the actors involved in the adoption process are suggested. (AU)


Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comprender de qué forma es abordada, descripta y problematizado en la literatura científica, la evaluación de pretendientes a adopción en el contexto brasileño, por medio de una revisión integrativa. A partir de criterios preestablecidos, en las bases de datos Scielo, PePSIC, LILACS y PsycINFO (2006-2016), fueron recuperados 30 estudios, analizados por la estrategia PRISMA. Predominan estudios empíricos, de carácter cualitativo, con instrumentos y muestras variadas. En general, los estudios discuten una cultura de adopción en la cual el niño es reconocido como protagonista, así como diferentes configuraciones familiares que ganan visibilidad y buscan legitimidad. Sólo ocho estudios permiten la visualización de instrumentos / técnicas, desafíos, recomendaciones y críticas presentes en el proceso de evaluación. Sin embargo, en ningún momento la evaluación de los pretendientes es foco de problematización, limitando las comprensiones sobre la práctica profesional y sugiriendo tratarse de un análisis subjetivo por los aspectos abstractos que abarca. Se sugieren investigaciones futuras sobre los actores envueltos en los bastidores de la adopción. (AU)


Subject(s)
Adoption/psychology , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Legal Process
19.
Estud. psicol. (Natal) ; 22(4): 412-421, out.-dez. 2017.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, Index Psychology - journals | ID: biblio-953541

ABSTRACT

Novas formas de exercício da parentalidade gradativamente conquistam reconhecimento na sociedade e embora não seja uma prática recente, a adoção é vista mais frequentemente como opção às famílias. Assim, este estudo investigou a visão dos técnicos judiciários sobre a habilitação de novos perfis de candidatos e identificou diferenças nas avaliações. Foram entrevistados 17 psicólogos e assistentes sociais que realizavam avaliações de candidatos à adoção no sul do Brasil. A análise de conteúdo das entrevistas mostrou diferenças nas avaliações nos temas: divisão de papéis em casais homossexuais, rede de apoio em famílias monoparentais, projeto adotivo comum nos recasamentos e distanciamento geracional para os idosos. Percebeu-se preocupação com as crianças adotivas, mas alguns relatos retrataram valores ligados a concepções biológicas de família. Pensa-se que as várias configurações familiares apresentam desafios aos profissionais. Portanto, ressalta-se a importância de que os profissionais conheçam essas questões para combater preconceitos e reinventarem novos modos de atuação.


New forms of parenting are gradually becoming more recognized in the society and, although not a new practice, adoption is seen increasingly as an option for families. This study investigated the view of juridical technicians involved in the habilitation process of new profiles of adoption applicants and also identified differences within those evaluations. Seventeen psychologists and social workers in southern Brazil were interviewed. Qualitative content analysis showed differences in practices about the issues: role division in homosexual couples, support-network in monoparental families, adoption as a family project in remarriages and generational gap in older applicants. These themes reflected concern for the children placed in adoption, but some reports portray values connected to biological family conceptions'. The various families' possibilities present challenges to professionals. Therefore, it's important that professionals know those subjects to combat prejudices and reinvent new performance modes.


Nuevas configuraciones del ejercicio de la parentalidad vienen conquistando gradualmente un mayor reconocimiento en la sociedad y aunque no sea una práctica nueva, la adopción se ve cada vez más como opción para formar una familia. Así, el presente estudio investigó el parecer de los técnicos judiciales sobre la habilitación de nuevos perfiles de candidatos e identificó diferencias en sus evaluaciones. Fueron entrevistados 17 psicólogos y asistentes sociales que realizaban evaluaciones de candidatos a adopción en el sur de Brasil. El contenido cualitativo de las entrevistas mostró diferencias en las prácticas en los temas: divisiones de papeles en parejas homosexuales, red de apoyo en familias monoparentales, proyecto adoptivo común en casos de segundas nupcias y distanciamiento generacional en candidatos mayores. Se realizó que estos temas reflejaron preocupación con los niños en adopción pero algunos relatos mostraron valores vinculados a concepciones biológicas de familia. Se observa que las varias posibilidades de familia presentan desafíos a los profesionales. Se debe resaltar, así, la importancia de que estos profesionales conozcan esa realidad para combatir y que repiensen nuevos modos de actuación.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Adoption/psychology , Legal Process , Family Relations/psychology , Brazil , Interviews as Topic/methods , Psychology , Social Workers
20.
Pensando fam ; 21(2): 45-59, dez. 2017.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-895230

ABSTRACT

As diversas conquistas das mulheres no decorrer da história e os avanços das leis sobre a adoção possibilitaram que uma mulher, sem a presença de um cônjuge, conquistasse o direito de adotar uma criança, surgindo um novo arranjo familiar. Essa revisão assistemática de literatura objetivou discutir a monoparentalidade feminina constituída através da adoção. A partir dos estudos nacionais e internacionais encontrados, os resultados apontam que as mães solteiras por escolha têm aproximadamente 30 anos, possuem elevada escolaridade e estabilidade no mercado de trabalho, e não apresentam dificuldades em trabalhar e cuidar do filho adotivo. As mães são vistas como "atípicas" e enfrentam problemas morais que envolvem o exercício da parentalidade sem um cônjuge. A ausência do cônjuge leva a uma maior proximidade com a mãe segundo os filhos. Finalmente, o apoio social, especialmente da família extensa, é esperado e necessário. Reflexões sobre a singularidade desse arranjo familiar são propostas.(AU)


The many achievements of women in the course history and the advance of the laws about adoption made it possible that a woman, without a spouse, conquered the right to adopt a child, resulting in a new family arrangement. This unsystematic review of literature aimed to discuss the female single parenthood constituted through the adoption. The national and international studies found show that single mothers by choice are approximately 30 years old, have high schooling and stability in the job market, and do not present difficulties in working and taking care of adopted child. This mothers are seen as "atypical" and face moral problems which involve the exercise of parenthood without a spouse. The absence of the spouse leads to greater proximity to the mother according to the children. Finally, social support, especially extended family, is expected and necessary. Reflections on the singularity of this family arrangement are proposed.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Single Parent , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Parenting/trends , Single-Parent Family
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...