ABSTRACT
An enlarged left atrial volume index (LAVI) at rest mirrors increased LA pressure and/or impairment of LA function. A cardiovascular stress may acutely modify left atrial volume (LAV) within minutes. Aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and functional correlates of LAV-stress echocardiography (SE) Out of 514 subjects referred to 10 quality-controlled labs, LAV-SE was completed in 490 (359 male, age 67 ± 12 years) with suspected or known chronic coronary syndromes (n = 462) or asymptomatic controls (n = 28). The utilized stress was exercise in 177, vasodilator in 167, dobutamine in 146. LAV was measured with the biplane disk summation method. SE was performed with the ABCDE protocol. The intra-observer and inter-observer LAV variability were 5% and 8%, respectively. ∆-LAVI changes (stress-rest) were negatively correlated with resting LAVI (r = - 0.271, p < 0.001) and heart rate reserve (r = -.239, p < 0.001). LAV-dilators were defined as those with stress-rest increase ≥ 6.8 ml/m2, a cutoff derived from a calculated reference change value above the biological, analytical and observer variability of LAVI. LAV dilation occurred in 56 patients (11%), more frequently with exercise (16%) and dipyridamole (13%) compared to dobutamine (4%, p < 0.01). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, B-lines ≥ 2 (OR: 2.586, 95% CI = 1.1293-5.169, p = 0.007) and abnormal contractile reserve (OR: 2.207, 95% CI = 1.111-4.386, p = 0.024) were associated with LAV dilation. In conclusion, LAV-SE is feasible with high success rate and low variability in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. LAV dilation is more likely with reduced left ventricular contractile reserve and pulmonary congestion.
Subject(s)
Atrial Function, Left , Atrial Pressure , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography, Doppler, Pulsed , Echocardiography, Stress , Heart Atria/diagnostic imaging , Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Argentina , Brazil , Chronic Disease , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Europe , Exercise , Feasibility Studies , Female , Heart Atria/physiopathology , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Syndrome , Vasodilator Agents/administration & dosageABSTRACT
The peak stress/rest ratio of left ventricular (LV) elastance, or LV force, is a load-independent index of left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR) with stress echo (SE). To assess the accuracy of LVCR calculated during SE with approaches of different complexity. Two-hundred-forty patients were referred to SE for known or suspected coronary artery disease or heart failure and, of those, 200 patients, age 61 ± 15, 99 females, with interpretable volumetric SE were enrolled. All readers had passed the upstream quality control reading for regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) and end-systolic volume (ESV) measurement. The employed stress was dipyridamole (0.84 mg, 6 min) in 86 (43%) and dobutamine (up to 40 mcg/kg/min) in 114 (57%) patients. All underwent SE with evaluation of RWMA and simultaneous LVCR assessment with stress/rest ratio of LV force (systolic blood pressure by cuff sphygmomanometer/ESV). ESV was calculated in each patient by two of three methods: biplane Simpson rule (S, in 100 patients), single plane area-length (AL, apical four-chamber area and length, in 100 patients), and Teichholz rule (T, from parasternal long axis and/or short axis view, in 200 patients). RMWA were observed in 54 patients. Success rate for ESV measurement was 76% (100/131) for S, 92% (100/109) for AL, and 100% (240/240) for T. There were 100 paired measurements (rest and stress) with S versus T, and 100 with AL versus T. The analysis time was the shortest for T (33 ± 8 s at rest, 34 ± 7 s at stress), intermediate for AL (70 ± 22 s at rest 67 ± 21 s at stress), and the longest for S (136 ± 24 at rest 129 ± 27 s at stress, p < 0.05 vs. T and AL). ESV absolute values were moderately correlated: T versus S (r rest = 0.746, p < 0.01, n = 100; r stress = 0.794, p < 0.01, n = 100); T vs. AL (r = 0.603 p < 0.01, n = 100, at rest and r = 0.820 p < 0.01 n = 100 at peak stress). LVCR values were tightly correlated independently of the method employed: T versus S (r = 0.899, p < 0.01, n = 100), and T versus AL (r = 0.845, p < 0.01, n = 100). LVCR can be accurately determined with all three methods used to extract the raw values of ESV necessary to generate the calculation of Force. Although S is known to be more precise in determining absolute ESV values, the relative (rest-stress) changes can be assessed, with comparable accuracy, with simpler and more feasible T and AL methods, characterized by higher success rate, shorter imaging and analysis time.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography, Stress/methods , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Dipyridamole/administration & dosage , Dobutamine/administration & dosage , Feasibility Studies , Female , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Systole , Vasodilator Agents/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Simplified projected aortic valve area (EOAproj) is a valuable echocardiographic parameter in the evaluation of low flow low gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG AS). Its widespread use in clinical practice is hampered by the laborious process of flow rate (Q) calculation. OBJETIVE: This study proposes a less burdensome, alternative method of Q calculation to be incorporated in the original formula of EOAproj and measures the agreement between the new proposed method of EOAproj calculation and the original one. METHODS: Retrospective observational single-institution study that included all consecutive patients with classic LFLG AS that showed a Q variation with dobutamine infusion ≥ |15|% by both calculation methods. RESULTS: Twenty-two consecutive patients with classical LFLG AS who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography were included. Nine patients showed a Q variation with dobutamine infusion calculated by both classical and alternative methods ≥ |15|% and were selected for further statistical analysis. Using the Bland-Altman method to assess agreement we found a systematic bias of 0,037 cm2 (95% CI 0,004 - 0,066), meaning that on average the new method overestimates the EOAproj in 0,037 cm2 compared to the original method. The 95% limits of agreement are narrow (from -0,04 cm2 to 0,12 cm2), meaning that for 95% of individuals, EOAproj calculated by the new method would be between 0,04 cm2 less to 0,12 cm2 more than the EOAproj calculated by the original equation. CONCLUSION: The bias and 95% limits of agreement of the new method are narrow and not clinically relevant, supporting the potential interchangeability of the two methods of EOAproj calculation. As the new method requires less additional measurements, it would be easier to implement in clinical practice, promoting an increase in the use of EOAproj.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography, Stress/methods , Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Blood Flow Velocity , Dobutamine/administration & dosage , Echocardiography, Doppler/methods , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Ventricular Function, LeftABSTRACT
Abstract Background: Simplified projected aortic valve area (EOAproj) is a valuable echocardiographic parameter in the evaluation of low flow low gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG AS). Its widespread use in clinical practice is hampered by the laborious process of flow rate (Q) calculation. Objetive: This study proposes a less burdensome, alternative method of Q calculation to be incorporated in the original formula of EOAproj and measures the agreement between the new proposed method of EOAproj calculation and the original one. Methods: Retrospective observational single-institution study that included all consecutive patients with classic LFLG AS that showed a Q variation with dobutamine infusion ≥ -15-% by both calculation methods. Results: Twenty-two consecutive patients with classical LFLG AS who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography were included. Nine patients showed a Q variation with dobutamine infusion calculated by both classical and alternative methods ≥ -15-% and were selected for further statistical analysis. Using the Bland-Altman method to assess agreement we found a systematic bias of 0,037 cm2 (95% CI 0,004 - 0,066), meaning that on average the new method overestimates the EOAproj in 0,037 cm2 compared to the original method. The 95% limits of agreement are narrow (from -0,04 cm2 to 0,12 cm2), meaning that for 95% of individuals, EOAproj calculated by the new method would be between 0,04 cm2 less to 0,12 cm2 more than the EOAproj calculated by the original equation. Conclusion: The bias and 95% limits of agreement of the new method are narrow and not clinically relevant, supporting the potential interchangeability of the two methods of EOAproj calculation. As the new method requires less additional measurements, it would be easier to implement in clinical practice, promoting an increase in the use of EOAproj.
Resumo Fundamento: A área valvular aórtica projetada simplificada (AEOproj) é um parâmetro ecocardiográfico valioso na avaliação da estenose aórtica de baixo fluxo e baixo gradiente (EA BFBG). Sua utilização na prática clínica é limitada pelo trabalhoso processo de cálculo da taxa de fluxo (Q). Objetivos: Este estudo propõe um método alternativo, menos complexo, para o cálculo da Q para ser incorporado na fórmula original da AEOproj, e mede a concordância entre o novo método proposto para o cálculo da AEOproj em comparação ao método original. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo, observacional, unicêntrico que incluiu todos os pacientes com AE BFBG clássica com variação da Q com infusão de dobutamina ≥ -15-% por ambos os métodos. Resultados: Foram incluídos 22 pacientes consecutivos com AE BFBG clássico, que se submeteram à ecocardiografia sob estresse com dobutamina. Nove pacientes apresentaram uma variação da Q com infusão de dobutamina calculada tanto pelo método clássico como pelo método alternativo ≥ -15-%, e foram selecionados para análise estatística. Utilizando método Bland-Altman para avaliar a concordância, encontramos um viés sistemático de 0,037 cm2 (IC 95% 0,004 - 0,066), o que significa que, em média, o novo método superestima a AEOproj em 0m037 cm2 em comparação ao método original. Os limites de concordância de 95% são estreitos (de -0,04 cm2 a 0,12 cm2), o que significa que para 95% dos indivídios, a AEOproj calculada pelo novo método estaria entre 0,04 cm2 menos a 0,12 cm2 mais que a AEOproj calculada pela equação original. Conclusão: O viés e os limites de 95% de concordância do novo método são estreitos e não são clinicamente relevantes, o que corrobora a intercambialidade dos dois métodos de cálculo da AEOproj. Uma vez que o novo método requer menos medidas, seria mais fácil de ser implementado na prática clínica, promovendo um aumento na utilização da AEOproj.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography, Stress/methods , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Severity of Illness Index , Blood Flow Velocity , Infusions, Intravenous , Echocardiography, Doppler/methods , Retrospective Studies , Ventricular Function, Left , Dobutamine/administration & dosage , Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , HemodynamicsABSTRACT
AIM: The present study evaluated the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of nebivolol enantiomers in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in patients undergoing haemodialysis. METHODS: Forty-three adult patients were distributed into three groups: healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients with normal kidney function (n = 22); patients with stage 3 and 4 CKD (n = 11); and patients with stage 5 CKD undergoing haemodialysis (n = 10). The subjects received a single oral dose of 10 mg racemic nebivolol. Serial blood samples were collected up to 48 h after administration of the drug and heart rate variation was measured over the same interval during the isometric handgrip test. The nebivolol enantiomers in plasma were analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of nebivolol is enantioselective, with a greater plasma proportion of l-nebivolol. CKD increased the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of l-nebivolol (6.83 ng.h ml(-1) vs. 9.94 ng.h ml(-1) ) and d-nebivolol (4.15 ng.h ml(-1) vs. 7.30 ng.h ml(-1) ) when compared with the control group. However, the AUC values of l-nebivolol (6.41 ng.h ml(-1) ) and d-nebivolol (4.95 ng.h ml(-1) ) did not differ between the haemodialysis and control groups. The administration of a single dose of 10 mg nebivolol did not alter the heart rate variation induced by isometric exercise in the investigated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Stage 3 and 4 CKD increases the plasma concentrations of both nebivolol enantiomers, while haemodialysis restores the pharmacokinetic parameters to values similar to those observed in the control group. No significant difference in heart rate variation induced by isometric exercise was observed between the investigated groups after the administration of a single oral dose of 10 mg nebivolol.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Nebivolol/administration & dosage , Renal Dialysis/methods , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/metabolism , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists/chemistry , Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Aged , Area Under Curve , Case-Control Studies , Chromatography, Liquid , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Nebivolol/chemistry , Nebivolol/pharmacokinetics , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Stereoisomerism , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To gather information for a future confirmatory trial of dobutamine (DB) for circulatory impairment (ie, low superior vena cava [SVC] flow). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 127 infants born at < 31 weeks gestational age were serially scanned from birth to 96 hours after birth. The infants were randomly assigned to 2 groups and were treated with DB (stepwise dose increase, 5-10-15-20 µg/kg/min) or placebo if they had an SVC flow < 41 mL/kg/min within the first 24 hours after birth. The primary outcome measures were the achievement and maintenance of an SVC flow ≥ 41 mL/kg/min. Secondary outcome measures were the short-term evolution of clinical and biochemical variables, near-infrared spectroscopy, cranial Doppler ultrasound, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: SVC flow increased throughout the first 96 hours for the entire cohort. All of the randomized infants (n = 28) except 2 achieved and maintained an SVC flow ≥ 41 mL/kg/min after intervention; however, the infants treated with DB (n = 16) showed a higher heart rate and improved base excess compared with those treated with placebo (n = 12). Low SVC flow was associated with low gestational age (P = .02) and poor condition at birth (P = .02). Low SVC flow significantly increased the risk of severe ischemic events (OR, 13; 95% CI, 2.4-69.2; P < .01). CONCLUSION: This exploratory trial demonstrates a tendency toward improved short-term clinical and biochemical perfusion variable outcomes in infants with low SVC flow treated with DB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01605279) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EurodraCT 2009-010901-35).
Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Dobutamine/therapeutic use , Regional Blood Flow/drug effects , Vena Cava, Superior/drug effects , Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Blood Flow Velocity/drug effects , Blood Flow Velocity/physiology , Cardiotonic Agents/administration & dosage , Dobutamine/administration & dosage , Echocardiography, Doppler , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Male , Pilot Projects , Spain , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared , Treatment Outcome , Vena Cava, Superior/physiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this study is to highlight some of the recent findings related with the management of acute exacerbations in the context of the emergency department setting. RECENT FINDINGS: ß2-agonist heliox-driven nebulization significantly increased by 17% [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.2-29.4] peak expiratory flow, and decreased the rate of hospital admissions (risk ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.98), compared with oxygen-driven nebulization. Other findings indicate that there is no robust evidence to support the use of intravenous or nebulized magnesium sulphate in adults with severe acute asthma, and that levalbuterol was not superior to albuterol regarding efficacy and safety in individuals with acute asthma. Finally, hyperlactatemia developed during the first hours of acute asthma treatment has a high prevalence, is related with the use of ß2-agonists and had no clinical consequences. SUMMARY: After a comprehensive review of the best quality pieces of literature published in the last year, it is possible to conclude that the goals of acute asthma management remain almost unchanged.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Albuterol/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Helium/therapeutic use , Magnesium Sulfate/therapeutic use , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Acute Disease , Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Agonists/adverse effects , Adult , Asthma/physiopathology , Evidence-Based Emergency Medicine , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hyperlactatemia/chemically induced , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Dobutamine is a ß-adrenergic agonist with an affinity higher for receptor expressed in the heart (ß1) than for receptors expressed in the arteries (ß2). When systemically administered, it increases cardiac demand. Thus, dobutamine unmasks abnormal rhythm or ischemic areas potentially at risk of infarction. Monitoring of heart function during a cardiac stress test can be performed by either echocardiography or cardiac catheterization. The latter is an invasive but more accurate and informative technique that the former. Cardiac stress test induced by dobutamine and monitored by cardiac catheterization accomplished as described here allows, in a single experiment, the measurement of the following hemodynamic parameters: heart rate (HR), systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, end-diastolic pressure, maximal positive pressure development (dP/dtmax) and maximal negative pressure development (dP/dtmin), at baseline conditions and under increasing doses of dobutamine. As expected, in normal mice we observed a dobutamine dose-related increase in HR, dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin. Moreover, at the highest dose tested (12 ng/g/min) the cardiac decompensation of high fat diet-induced obese mice was unmasked.