Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 337
Filter
1.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e55037, 2024 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648098

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: ChatGPT is the most advanced large language model to date, with prior iterations having passed medical licensing examinations, providing clinical decision support, and improved diagnostics. Although limited, past studies of ChatGPT's performance found that artificial intelligence could pass the American Heart Association's advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) examinations with modifications. ChatGPT's accuracy has not been studied in more complex clinical scenarios. As heart disease and cardiac arrest remain leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States, finding technologies that help increase adherence to ACLS algorithms, which improves survival outcomes, is critical. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the accuracy of ChatGPT in following ACLS guidelines for bradycardia and cardiac arrest. METHODS: We evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT's responses to 2 simulations based on the 2020 American Heart Association ACLS guidelines with 3 primary outcomes of interest: the mean individual step accuracy, the accuracy score per simulation attempt, and the accuracy score for each algorithm. For each simulation step, ChatGPT was scored for correctness (1 point) or incorrectness (0 points). Each simulation was conducted 20 times. RESULTS: ChatGPT's median accuracy for each step was 85% (IQR 40%-100%) for cardiac arrest and 30% (IQR 13%-81%) for bradycardia. ChatGPT's median accuracy over 20 simulation attempts for cardiac arrest was 69% (IQR 67%-74%) and for bradycardia was 42% (IQR 33%-50%). We found that ChatGPT's outputs varied despite consistent input, the same actions were persistently missed, repetitive overemphasis hindered guidance, and erroneous medication information was presented. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for consistent and reliable guidance to prevent potential medical errors and optimize the application of ChatGPT to enhance its reliability and effectiveness in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Advanced Cardiac Life Support , American Heart Association , Bradycardia , Heart Arrest , Humans , Heart Arrest/therapy , United States , Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Algorithms , Practice Guidelines as Topic
8.
Am Surg ; 89(7): 3125-3130, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36852712

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation of traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is variable, with approaches that overlap Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) algorithms. There is no standard algorithm for TCA, with some withholding ACLS protocols given abysmal outcomes. This study aims to assess surgeon practices and attitudes toward resuscitation practices in TCA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 16-question web-based survey was distributed to the membership of a national trauma association. Respondent demographics and management of TCA were analyzed. Chi-squared tests determined statistical significance. Open-ended responses were coded and analyzed inductively. RESULTS: Two hundred and three surveys were completed. 73.4% of respondents reported utilizing ACLS, while 26.6% reported they never utilized ACLS. A statistically significant difference in the performance of ACLS was found based on number of years in practice (P = .025) and the state of practice (P = .006). There was no significant difference in self-reported survival rates or legal, ethical, or interpersonal conflicts. Qualitative data highlighted themes of interpersonal conflict and futility. DISCUSSION: This study shows that one-quarter of respondents never utilize ACLS in TCA. Of those that utilize ACLS, there was variability in the technique, indication, and duration of resuscitation. Despite significant variability in technique, there appears to be similar survival rates and incidence of conflict. The association between years in practice and ACLS use suggests this may represent an emerging change in practice. The low response rate limits generalizability; however, there is significant variability in practice, highlighting a need for evidence-based guidelines.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Heart Arrest , Humans , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Heart Arrest/etiology , Heart Arrest/therapy , Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Advanced Trauma Life Support Care
9.
N Engl J Med ; 388(4): 299-309, 2023 01 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36720132

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) restores perfusion and oxygenation in a patient who does not have spontaneous circulation. The evidence with regard to the effect of extracorporeal CPR on survival with a favorable neurologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is inconclusive. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial conducted in the Netherlands, we assigned patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to receive extracorporeal CPR or conventional CPR (standard advanced cardiac life support). Eligible patients were between 18 and 70 years of age, had received bystander CPR, had an initial ventricular arrhythmia, and did not have a return of spontaneous circulation within 15 minutes after CPR had been initiated. The primary outcome was survival with a favorable neurologic outcome, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 (range, 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) at 30 days. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Of the 160 patients who underwent randomization, 70 were assigned to receive extracorporeal CPR and 64 to receive conventional CPR; 26 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria at hospital admission were excluded. At 30 days, 14 patients (20%) in the extracorporeal-CPR group were alive with a favorable neurologic outcome, as compared with 10 patients (16%) in the conventional-CPR group (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 3.5; P = 0.52). The number of serious adverse events per patient was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, extracorporeal CPR and conventional CPR had similar effects on survival with a favorable neurologic outcome. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and Maquet Cardiopulmonary [Getinge]; INCEPTION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03101787.).


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Humans , Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Hospitalization , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Ventricular Fibrillation/therapy , Netherlands
11.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 22522, 2021 11 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34795366

ABSTRACT

In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is associated with poor outcomes. There are currently no standards for cardiac arrest teams in terms of member composition and task allocation. Here we aimed to compare two different cardiac arrest team concepts to cover IHCA management in terms of survival and neurological outcomes. This prospective study enrolled 412 patients with IHCA from general medical wards. From May 2014 to April 2016, 228 patients were directly transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) for ongoing resuscitation. In the ICU, resuscitation was extended to advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) (Load-and-Go [LaG] group). By May 2016, a dedicated cardiac arrest team provided by the ICU provided ACLS in the ward. After return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), the patients (n = 184) were transferred to the ICU (Stay-and-Treat [SaT] group). Overall, baseline characteristics, aetiologies, and characteristics of cardiac arrest were similar between groups. The time to endotracheal intubation was longer in the LaG group than in the SaT group (6 [5, 8] min versus 4 [2, 5] min, p = 0.001). In the LaG group, 96% of the patients were transferred to the ICU regardless of ROSC achievement. In the SaT group, 83% of patients were transferred to the ICU (p = 0.001). Survival to discharge did not differ between the LaG (33%) and the SaT (35%) groups (p = 0.758). Ultimately, 22% of patients in the LaG group versus 21% in the SaT group were discharged with good neurological outcomes (p = 0.857). In conclusion, we demonstrated that the cardiac arrest team concepts for the management of IHCA did not differ in terms of survival and neurological outcomes. However, a dedicated (intensive care) cardiac arrest team could take some load off the ICU.


Subject(s)
Cardiology/standards , Heart Arrest/mortality , Heart Arrest/therapy , Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiology/methods , Cardiology/organization & administration , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/organization & administration , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Hospitals , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
12.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 486-491, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34517174

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As advanced life support (ALS) provided by emergency medical services (EMS) on scene becomes more common, the scene time interval (STI) for which EMS providers stay on scene tends to lengthen. We investigated the relationship between the STI and neurological outcome of patients at hospital discharge when ALS was provided by EMS on scene. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) data between August 2015 and December 2018. A restricted cubic spline curve was used to investigate the relationship between the STI and neurologic outcome, and patients were divided into two groups based on the cut-off value obtained through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Comparisons of outcomes between the two groups were performed before and after propensity score matching. RESULTS: 4548 patients were included in the analysis. In ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value for STI was 19 min. For the group with an STI <19 min, survival admission, survival discharge, and good neurologic outcome at hospital discharge were all higher than for the group with STI ≥19 min before and after propensity score matching. The multivariable model also showed that the STI ≥19 min was significantly associated with poor neurologic outcome at hospital discharge compared with the STI <19 min (adjusted odds ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.40-2.88). CONCLUSIONS: A duration of on-scene ALS more than 19 min was associated with a poor neurologic outcome of patients at hospital discharge in OHCA.


Subject(s)
Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Aged , Emergency Medical Services , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies
13.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol ; 35(1): 67-82, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742579

ABSTRACT

Airway management and ventilation are essential components of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to achieve oxygen delivery in order to prevent hypoxic injury and increase the chance of survival. Weighing the relative benefits and downsides, the best approach is a staged strategy; start with a focus on high-quality chest compressions and defibrillation, then optimize mask ventilation while preparing for advanced airway management with a supraglottic airway device. Endotracheal intubation can still be indicated, but has the largest downsides of all advanced airway techniques. Whichever stage of airway management, ventilation and chest compression quality should be closely monitored. Capnography has many advantages and should be used routinely. Optimizing ventilation strategies, harmonizing ventilation with mechanical chest compression devices, and implementation in complex and stressful environments are challenges we need to face through collaborative innovation, research, and implementation.


Subject(s)
Advanced Cardiac Life Support/standards , Airway Management/standards , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Respiration, Artificial/standards , Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Airway Management/methods , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/standards , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/standards , Manikins , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/diagnosis , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/physiopathology , Respiration, Artificial/methods
14.
Am J Emerg Med ; 43: 62-68, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33529851

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care (POC) ultrasound protocols are commonly used for the initial management of patients with cardiac arrest in the emergency department (ED). However, there is little published evidence regarding any mortality benefit. We compared and studied the effect of implementation of the modified SESAME protocol in terms of clinical outcomes and resuscitation management. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective observational study. We conducted a pre- and post-intervention study to evaluate changes in patient outcomes and management after educating emergency medicine residents and the faculty about the modified SESAME protocol. The pre-intervention period lasted from March 2018 to February 2019, and the post-intervention period lasted from May 2019 to April 2020. The modified SESAME protocol education was initiated in March 2019. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between independent variables and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were included in this study during a 24-month period. We found no significant differences between the two groups for the primary outcome of survival to hospital admission (pre-intervention group 28.9% versus post-intervention group 28.6%; P = 0.751), survival to hospital discharge (12.1% vs. 12.4%; P = 0.806), and good neurologic outcome at discharge (6.0% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.509). The proportion of resuscitation procedures of thrombolysis, emergency transfusion, tube thoracotomy, and pericardiocentesis during resuscitation increased from 0.6% in the pre-intervention period to 4.9% in the post-intervention period (P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: We did not discover any significant survival benefits associated with the implementation of the modified SESAME protocol; however, early diagnosis of specific pathologies (pericardial effusion, possible pulmonary embolism, tension pneumothorax, and hypovolemia) and accordingly a direct increase in the resuscitation management were seen in this study. Future studies with larger sample sizes are required to examine the clinical outcomes as well as to identify the most effective POC ultrasonography protocols for non-traumatic cardiac arrests.


Subject(s)
Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Point-of-Care Testing/standards , Advanced Cardiac Life Support/education , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Protocols/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/diagnosis , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography
15.
Singapore Med J ; 62(8): 390-403, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35001112

ABSTRACT

Advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) emphasises the use of advanced airway management and ventilation, circulatory support and the appropriate use of drugs in resuscitation, as well as the identification of reversible causes of cardiac arrest. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and organ donation, as well as special circumstances including drowning, pulmonary embolism and pregnancy are addressed. Resuscitation does not end with ACLS but must continue in post-resuscitation care. ACLS also covers the recognition and management of unstable pre-arrest tachy- and bradydysrhythmias that may deteriorate further.


Subject(s)
Advanced Cardiac Life Support , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Heart Arrest , Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Airway Management , Heart Arrest/therapy , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Singapore
16.
Am J Emerg Med ; 42: 161-167, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32111405

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The time dependence of a multi-tier response for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time-dependent effect of EMS response type in a multi-tiered system on the clinical outcomes of OHCA. METHODS: Adult EMS-treated OHCA of presumed cardiac etiology who were not witnessed by EMS between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. The main exposure was EMS response type: single-tier response, early multi-tier response (0-18 min from call to second EMS arrival), and late multi-tier response (19 min from call to second EMS arrival). The primary outcome was good neurologic recovery at the time of discharge from the hospital. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for patient-community and prehospital variables. RESULTS: Among 54,436 patients, 29,995 patients (55.1%), 21,552 patients (39.6%), and 2889 patients (5.3%) were treated by single-tiered EMS, early multi-tiered EMS, and late multi-tiered EMS, respectively. Good neurological recovery and survival to discharge were more frequent in the early multi-tiered response group (6.4% and 9.7%) than in the single-tiered response group (4.8% and 7.5%) or late multi-tiered response group (3.1% and 5.8%). Compared to the single-tiered response group, the early multi-tiered response group was more likely to have good neurological recovery (adjusted OR, 95% CI: 1.15 [1.06-1.26]), but the late multi-tiered response group was less likely to have good neurological recovery (adjusted OR, 95% CI: 0.76 [0.61-0.96]). CONCLUSION: In our basic to intermediate-tiered EMS system, early multi-tier response was associated with improved survival and good neurological recovery.


Subject(s)
Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Time-to-Treatment , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Early Medical Intervention/methods , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Nervous System Diseases/prevention & control , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/etiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Survival Analysis
17.
Am J Emerg Med ; 39: 168-172, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33162264

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is recommended in contemporary educational efforts by the American Heart Association (AHA) as central to adult Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS). However, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) 2019 recommendations update describes large evidentiary gaps for epinephrine use in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, highlighting that clinical and experimental evidence do not support the current AHA recommendations. OBJECTIVE: This controversies article was written as a response to updated AHA and ILCOR adult ACLS recommendations in late 2019. This report summarizes and evaluates the evidence surrounding epinephrine for cardiac arrest with a focus on the historical perspective of epinephrine research. DISCUSSION: According to the 2019 AHA ACLS guidelines, epinephrine is an integral component of adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Epinephrine improves rates of return of spontaneous circulation and might provide benefit at different doses or in select resuscitation scenarios, such asystole as an initial rhythm at onset of resuscitation efforts. However, evidence indicates potential harms with routine use of standard dose epinephrine (1 mg/10 mL), with no improvement in neurologic or long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite years of use and inclusion in resuscitation guidelines, epinephrine is not associated with improved neurologic outcomes. The AHA Emergency Cardiovascular Care committee should revise ACLS guidelines reflecting evidence that standard-dose epinephrine offers little benefit to successful patient recovery including neurologic outcomes. Future resuscitation guidelines should reflect this important consideration.


Subject(s)
Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Heart Arrest/drug therapy , Advanced Cardiac Life Support/standards , Advanced Cardiac Life Support/trends , Biomedical Research , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Treatment Outcome
18.
Lancet ; 396(10265): 1807-1816, 2020 12 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33197396

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and ventricular fibrillation, more than half present with refractory ventricular fibrillation unresponsive to initial standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) treatment. We did the first randomised clinical trial in the USA of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-facilitated resuscitation versus standard ACLS treatment in patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation. METHODS: For this phase 2, single centre, open-label, adaptive, safety and efficacy randomised clinical trial, we included adults aged 18-75 years presenting to the University of Minnesota Medical Center (MN, USA) with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation, no return of spontaneous circulation after three shocks, automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a Lund University Cardiac Arrest System, and estimated transfer time shorter than 30 min. Patients were randomly assigned to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation or standard ACLS treatment on hospital arrival by use of a secure schedule generated with permuted blocks of randomly varying block sizes. Allocation concealment was achieved by use of a randomisation schedule that required scratching off an opaque layer to reveal assignment. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were safety, survival, and functional assessment at hospital discharge and at 3 months and 6 months after discharge. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. The study qualified for exception from informed consent (21 Code of Federal Regulations 50.24). The ARREST trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03880565. FINDINGS: Between Aug 8, 2019, and June 14, 2020, 36 patients were assessed for inclusion. After exclusion of six patients, 30 were randomly assigned to standard ACLS treatment (n=15) or to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation (n=15). One patient in the ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group withdrew from the study before discharge. The mean age was 59 years (range 36-73), and 25 (83%) of 30 patients were men. Survival to hospital discharge was observed in one (7%) of 15 patients (95% credible interval 1·6-30·2) in the standard ACLS treatment group versus six (43%) of 14 patients (21·3-67·7) in the early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group (risk difference 36·2%, 3·7-59·2; posterior probability of ECMO superiority 0·9861). The study was terminated at the first preplanned interim analysis by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute after unanimous recommendation from the Data Safety Monitoring Board after enrolling 30 patients because the posterior probability of ECMO superiority exceeded the prespecified monitoring boundary. Cumulative 6-month survival was significantly better in the early ECMO group than in the standard ACLS group. No unanticipated serious adverse events were observed. INTERPRETATION: Early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation for patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation significantly improved survival to hospital discharge compared with standard ACLS treatment. FUNDING: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.


Subject(s)
Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Reperfusion/methods , Ventricular Fibrillation/diagnosis , Adult , Advanced Cardiac Life Support/standards , Aged , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Discharge/trends , Safety , Survival , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Fibrillation/complications , Ventricular Fibrillation/physiopathology , Young Adult
19.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0241804, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33156868

ABSTRACT

Improving outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) requires an integrated approach by strengthening the chain of survival and emergency care systems. This study aimed to identify the change in outcomes over a decade and effect of citywide intervention on good neurologic outcomes after OHCAs in Daegu. This is a before- and after-intervention study to examine the association between the citywide intervention to improve the chain of survival and outcomes after OHCA. The primary outcome was a good neurologic outcome, defined as a cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2. After dividing into 3 phases according to the citywide intervention, the trends in outcomes after OHCA by primary electrocardiogram rhythm were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the association between the phases and outcomes. Overall, 6203 patients with OHCA were eligible. For 10 years (2008-2017), the rate of survival to discharge and the good neurologic outcomes increased from 2.6% to 8.7% and from 1.5% to 6.6%, respectively. Especially for patients with an initial shockable rhythm, these changes in outcomes were more pronounced (survival to discharge: 23.3% in 2008 to 55.0% in 2017, good neurologic outcomes: 13.3% to 46.0%). Compared with phase 1, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for good neurologic outcomes was 1.20 (95% CI: 0.78-1.85) for phase 2 and 1.64 (1.09-2.46) for phase 3. For patients with an initial shockable rhythm, the AOR for good neurologic outcomes was 3.76 (1.88-7.52) for phase 2 and 5.51 (2.77-10.98) for phase 3. Citywide improvement was observed in the good neurologic outcomes after OHCAs of medical origin, and the citywide intervention was significantly associated with better outcomes, particularly in those with initial shockable rhythm.


Subject(s)
Advanced Cardiac Life Support/methods , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Aged , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergency Treatment , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...