School age effects of Minding the Baby-An attachment-based home-visiting intervention-On parenting and child behaviors.

Multiple interventions have been developed to improve the caregiver-child relationship as a buffer to the effects of early life adversity and toxic stress. However, relatively few studies have evaluated the long-term effects of these early childhood interventions, particularly on parenting and childhood behaviors. Here we describe the early school-age follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of Minding the Baby ® (MTB), a reflective, attachment-based, trauma-informed, preventive home-visiting intervention for first-time mothers and their infants. Results indicate that mothers who participated in MTB are less likely to show impaired mentalizing compared to control mothers two to eight years after the intervention ended. Additionally, MTB mothers have lower levels of hostile and coercive parenting, and their children have lower total and externalizing problem behavior scores when compared to controls at follow-up. We discuss our findings in terms of their contribution to understanding the long-term parenting and childhood socio-emotional developmental effects of early preventive interventions for stressed populations.

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Healthcare Utilization of Children in Pediatric Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and healthcare utilization patterns of children seen in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). STUDY DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, caregivers of patients who presented to 2 urban PEDs completed a survey regarding their children's ACEs, health care utilization patterns, and acceptance of PED-based ACEs screening and resources. Inclusion criteria were English-speaking caregivers of patients 0-17 years of age not requiring acute stabilization. Prevalence estimates were compared with national and state data from the National Survey of Children's Health by calculating risk differences and 95% CIs. The association of cumulative ACEs with caregiver-reported health care utilization patterns was evaluated using ORs. RESULTS: Among 1000 participants, 28.1% (95% CI 25.3-30.9) had 1 ACE; 17.8% (95% CI15.4-20.2) had ≥2 ACEs. Notably, children with higher cumulative ACEs were seen in the PED more frequently (0, 1, ≥2 visits) (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06-1.30, P = .002) and more likely to seek care in PEDs for sick visits (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.30, P = .01). About 9% of children exposed to ACEs did not have a primary care provider. Over 85% of caregivers reported never discussing ACEs with their primary care provider. Most caregivers felt comfortable addressing ACEs in PEDs (84.4%) and would use referral resources (90.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Given higher PED utilization in children with more ACEs and caregiver acceptance of PED-based screening and intervention, PEDs may represent a strategic and opportune setting to both assess and respond to ACEs among vulnerable populations.

Early Adversity and Development: Parsing Heterogeneity and Identifying Pathways of Risk and Resilience.

Adversity early in life is common and is a major risk factor for the onset of psychopathology. Delineating the neurodevelopmental pathways by which early adversity affects mental health is critical for early risk identification and targeted treatment approaches. A rapidly growing cross-species literature has facilitated advances in identifying the mechanisms linking adversity with psychopathology, specific dimensions of adversity and timing-related factors that differentially relate to outcomes, and protective factors that buffer against the effects of adversity. Yet, vast complexity and heterogeneity in early environments and neurodevelopmental trajectories contribute to the challenges of understanding risk and resilience in the context of early adversity. In this overview, the author highlights progress in four major areas-mechanisms, heterogeneity, developmental timing, and protective factors; synthesizes key challenges; and provides recommendations for future research that can facilitate progress in the field. Translation across species and ongoing refinement of conceptual models have strong potential to inform prevention and intervention strategies that can reduce the immense burden of psychopathology associated with early adversity.

Preventing Childhood Toxic Stress: Partnering With Families and Communities to Promote Relational Health.

By focusing on the safe, stable, and nurturing relationships (SSNRs) that buffer adversity and build resilience, pediatric care is on the cusp of a paradigm shift that could reprioritize clinical activities, rewrite research agendas, and realign our collective advocacy. Driving this transformation are advances in developmental sciences as they inform a deeper understanding of how early life experiences, both nurturing and adverse, are biologically embedded and influence outcomes in health, education, and economic stability across the life span. This revised policy statement on childhood toxic stress acknowledges a spectrum of potential adversities and reaffirms the benefits of an ecobiodevelopmental model for understanding the childhood origins of adult-manifested disease and wellness. It also endorses a paradigm shift toward relational health because SSNRs not only buffer childhood adversity when it occurs but also promote the capacities needed to be resilient in the future. To translate this relational health framework into clinical practice, generative research, and public policy, the entire pediatric community needs to adopt a public health approach that builds relational health by partnering with families and communities. This public health approach to relational health needs to be integrated both vertically (by including primary, secondary, and tertiary preventions) and horizontally (by including public service sectors beyond health care). The American Academy of Pediatrics asserts that SSNRs are biological necessities for all children because they mitigate childhood toxic stress responses and proactively build resilience by fostering the adaptive skills needed to cope with future adversity in a healthy manner.

Leveraging the Biology of Adversity and Resilience to Transform Pediatric Practice.

Advances in science are fundamentally changing the way we understand how inextricable interactions among genetic predispositions, physical and social environments, and developmental timing influence early childhood development and the foundations of health and how significant early adversity can lead to a lifetime of chronic health impairments. This article and companion article illustrate the extent to which differential outcomes are shaped by ongoing interactive adaptations to context that begin at or even before conception and continue throughout life, with increasing evidence pointing to the importance of the prenatal period and early infancy for the developing brain, the immune system, and metabolic regulation. Although new discoveries in the basic sciences are transforming tertiary medical care and producing breakthrough outcomes in treating disease, this knowledge is not being leveraged effectively to inform new approaches to promoting whole-child development and preventing illness. The opportunity for pediatrics to serve as the leading edge of science-based innovation across the early childhood ecosystem has never been more compelling. In this article, we present a framework for leveraging the frontiers of scientific discovery to inform new strategies in pediatric practice and advocacy to protect all developing biological systems from the disruptive effects of excessive early adversity beyond providing information on child development for parents and enriched learning experiences for young children.

Latent factors of adverse childhood experiences and adult-onset asthma.

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with complex etiology. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been linked to asthma in adulthood. Underlying potential mechanisms for the ACE-asthma relationship include stress-induced inflammatory pathways and immune dysregulation. We conducted a cross-sectional secondary data analysis of the 2013 Alberta ACE Survey to explore the relationship between latent ACE factors and self-reported adult asthma. We evaluated the underlying correlation structure among eight different ACEs using exploratory factor analysis. We conducted a logistic regression model to evaluate whether ACE factors retained from the factor analysis predicted self-reported asthma in adulthood. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We analyzed ACE survey results from 1207 participants. Factor analysis yielded four ACE latent factors: factor 1/relational violence, factor 2/negative home environment, factor 3/illness at home, and factor 4/sexual abuse. Results of the logistic regression showed that experiencing sexual abuse (OR: 3.23; 95% CI: 1.89, 5.23), relational violence (OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.17, 3.38), and being exposed to a negative home environment (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.03, 3.35) were predictive of a diagnosis of asthma in adulthood, whereas living in a household with someone experiencing illness did not show an effect (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.75, 2.56). Factor analysis provides an effectual approach to understand the long-term impact of ACEs on respiratory health. Our findings have important implications to understand the developmental origins of asthma in adulthood and inform interventions aimed at reducing the lasting negative impact of childhood adversities on future respiratory health.

Childhood adversity and self-poisoning: A hospital case control study in Sri Lanka.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse childhood experiences (ACE) have been recognized as an important risk factor for suicidal behaviour among adults, but evidence from low and middle-income countries is lacking. This study explored associations between ACE and hospital admission due to non-fatal self-poisoning in Sri Lanka. METHODS: This was a case-control study. Adults admitted to a tertiary care hospital for medical management of self-poisoning were included as cases, and age and sex matched controls were recruited from the outpatient department. ACE were measured using the World Health Organization's Childhood Adversity Scale. Logistic regression models adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, and religion were used to quantify the association between ACE and self-poisoning. RESULTS: The study included 235 cases and 451 controls. Cases were 2.5 times (95% CI 1.8, 3.6) more likely to report an ACE than controls and had higher ACE scores. Childhood physical abuse (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.2, 19.0) and emotional abuse or neglect (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.3, 10.1, and 3.7, 95% CI 2.3, 6.0 respectively), increased the risk of self-poisoning in adulthood, as did witnessing household violence (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4, 3.4), growing up in a household with a mentally ill or suicidal household member (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2, 3.4), and experiencing parental death/separation/divorce (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.0, 4.9) as a child. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing exposures to ACEs should be a priority for prevention of suicide and self-harm in Sri Lanka. Innovative methods to increase support for children facing adversity should be explored.

Implementing Patient-Centered Trauma-Informed Care for the Perinatal Nurse.

Adverse childhood experiences and trauma significantly impact physical and mental health. Increased maternal perinatal depression/anxiety, preterm labor, and low birth weight, as well as infant morbidity and mortality, are some examples of the impact of trauma on perinatal health. Trauma-informed care begins with knowledge about trauma, the ability to recognize signs of a trauma response, responding to patients effectively, and resisting retraumatization. As holistic providers, perinatal nurses can create safe care environments, establish collaborative patient relationships based on trust, demonstrate compassion, offer patients options when possible to support patient autonomy, and provide resources for trauma survivors. This can prevent or reduce the negative impact of trauma and improve the health and well-being of infants, mothers, and future generations. This clinical article outlines key strategies for implementation of patient-centered trauma-informed perinatal nursing care.

The Empower Action Model: A Framework for Preventing Adverse Childhood Experiences by Promoting Health, Equity, and Well-Being Across the Life Span.

The empower action model addresses childhood adversity as a root cause of disease by building resilience across multiple levels of influence to promote health, equity, and well-being. The model builds on the current evidence around adverse childhood experiences and merges important frameworks within key areas of public health-the socio-ecological model, protective factors, race equity and inclusion, and the life course perspective. The socio-ecological model is used as the foundation for this model to highlight the multilevel approach needed for improvement in public health. Five key principles that build on the protective factors literature are developed to be applied at each of the levels of the socio-ecological model: understanding, support, inclusion, connection, and growth. These principles are developed with actions that can be implemented across the life span. Finally, actions suggested with each principle are grounded in the tenets of race equity and inclusion, framing all actionable steps with an equity lens. This article discusses the process by which the model was developed and provides steps for states and communities to implement this tool. It also introduces efforts in a state to use this model within county coalitions through an innovative use of federal and foundation funding.

Addressing Health and Well-Being Through State Policy: Understanding Barriers and Opportunities for Policy-Making to Prevent Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) in South Carolina.

PURPOSE: As adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) become increasingly recognized as a root cause of unhealthy behaviors, researchers, practitioners, and legislators seek to understand policy strategies to prevent and mitigate its effects. Given the high prevalence of ACEs, policies that address ACEs can meaningfully prevent disease in adulthood and improve population health. We sought to understand barriers and opportunities for policies to prevent and mitigate ACEs by exploring state legislator perspectives. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four current state legislators in South Carolina. DESIGN: In 2018, we conducted semistructured interviews with 24 state legislators. Participants were recruited using maximum variation sampling. The researchers individually analyzed each interview transcript using focused coding qualitative techniques. A high inter-rater agreement was demonstrated (κ = .76 to .87), and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. METHOD: The data collection and analysis were guided by Multiple Streams Theory, which identifies 3 key components (attention to the problem, decisions about policy options, and the impact of political landscape) that can lead windows of opportunity for passing policies. RESULTS: Legislators identified several factors that can influence the passage of legislation on ACEs: awareness of ACEs; gaps in understanding about what can be done about ACEs; the use of data and stories that contextualize the problem of ACEs; capitalizing on the bipartisanship of children's issues; and linking to current ACEs-related issues on the policy agenda, such as school safety and violence prevention and the opioid epidemic. CONCLUSION: Public health researchers and practitioners should focus on the factors identified to advocate for policies that prevent ACEs and/or address their health consequences.

Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences in Primary Care: A Quality Improvement Project.

INTRODUCTION: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) advocates for the screening of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) during well-child care visits by pediatric health care providers. The evidence shows a strong correlation between children with high ACE scores and the likelihood of physical and mental health problems as adults. The purpose of this Quality Improvement (QI) project was to increase pediatric providers' awareness on ACEs through education and increase the utilization of an ACE screening tool. METHOD: This QI project used a pre-post test to evaluate the effectiveness of the educational model and the utilization of the screening tool within an urban pediatric primary care clinic. RESULTS: This project demonstrated an increase in provider awareness as well as a marked increase in the utilization of the screening tool. DISCUSSION: Four hundred eighty ACE screening tools were collected over a 12-week period. By introducing the ACE screening tool as the standard of care in the primary care office, providers can provide early interventions to mitigate the potential untoward outcomes. This QI project also demonstrated that there was a statistical and clinical significance (p value < 0.001) in the provider's knowledge pre-post the educational intervention.

Trauma-Informed Care in Pediatrics: A Developmental Perspective in Twelve Cases with Narratives.

INTRODUCTION: The dose-response relationship of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) with chronic morbidities is recognized as prevalent. However, screening for ACEs and implementing trauma-informed care (TIC) have yet to become a standard of care in pediatrics. OBJECTIVES: To document impactful developmental experiences of implementing TIC and universal screening of ACEs in the pediatric setting, elucidate the relationship between ACEs and their common presentation of developmental and behavioral health problems in pediatric patients, and propose feasible system changes to promote evidence-based professional expertise. METHODS: During pediatric residency training, I implemented routine universal screening of pediatric patients using ACE questionnaires. Research-based trauma-informed practices, such as patient-centered communication regarding adverse health outcomes associated with prevalent ACEs, were used. Clinical vignettes describe 12 cases. RESULTS: Most patients and their families were receptive to counsel on recognizing, preventing, and mitigating the effects of toxic stress resulting from ACEs. Behavior in a patient, and sometimes a parent, was addressed from a developmentally sensitive lens of TIC, and appropriate therapeutic interventions were discussed. Addressing ACEs opened crucial conversations with some patients, which promoted efficacious, developmentally sensitive care. DISCUSSION: Implementing TIC in the pediatric setting, especially in training, is not only feasible but also vital to adequately understand the patient population. Equipped with clinical knowledge and experience in addressing ACEs, practitioners will more readily empower patients and their families to improve health outcomes. CONCLUSION: When pediatric practitioners discover, intervene, and address the adverse effects of ACEs, their care becomes more efficacious and evidence based.