Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 85(5): 826-33, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22049035

ABSTRACT

We conducted a cost analysis of Haiti's Ministry of Public Health and Population neglected tropical disease program, Projet des Maladies Tropicales Negligées and collected data for 9 of 55 communes participating in the May 2008-April 2009 mass drug administration (MDA). The Projet des Maladies Tropicales Negligées Program partnered with IMA World Health and Hôpital Ste. Croix to implement MDA for treatment of lymphatic filariasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis by using once a year treatment with albendazole and diethylcarbamazine in a population of approximately 8 million persons. Methods included analyzing partner financial records and conducting retrospective surveys of personnel. In the nine communes, 633,261 persons were treated at a cost of U.S. $0.64 per person, which included the cost of donated drugs, and at a cost of U.S. $0.42 per person treated, when excluding donated drug costs. The MDA for lymphatic filariasis in Haiti began in 2000, with the treatment of 105,750 persons at a cost per person of U.S. $2.23. The decrease in cost per person treated is the result of cumulative implementation experience and economies of scale.


Subject(s)
Albendazole/therapeutic use , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Diethylcarbamazine/therapeutic use , Elephantiasis, Filarial/drug therapy , Helminthiasis/drug therapy , Neglected Diseases/drug therapy , Albendazole/administration & dosage , Albendazole/economics , Anthelmintics/administration & dosage , Anthelmintics/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diethylcarbamazine/administration & dosage , Diethylcarbamazine/economics , Drug Therapy/economics , Drug Therapy/methods , Elephantiasis, Filarial/economics , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Haiti/epidemiology , Helminthiasis/economics , Helminthiasis/epidemiology , Humans , Neglected Diseases/economics , Neglected Diseases/epidemiology , Prevalence
2.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 1(1): e67, 2007 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17989784

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Because lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination efforts are hampered by a dearth of economic information about the cost of mass drug administration (MDA) programs (using either albendazole with diethylcarbamazine [DEC] or albendazole with ivermectin), a multicenter study was undertaken to determine the costs of MDA programs to interrupt transmission of infection with LF. Such results are particularly important because LF programs have the necessary diagnostic and treatment tools to eliminate the disease as a public health problem globally, and already by 2006, the Global Programme to Eliminate LF had initiated treatment programs covering over 400 million of the 1.3 billion people at risk. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To obtain annual costs to carry out the MDA strategy, researchers from seven countries developed and followed a common cost analysis protocol designed to estimate 1) the total annual cost of the LF program, 2) the average cost per person treated, and 3) the relative contributions of the endemic countries and the external partners. Costs per person treated ranged from $0.06 to $2.23. Principal reasons for the variation were 1) the age (newness) of the MDA program, 2) the use of volunteers, and 3) the size of the population treated. Substantial contributions by governments were documented - generally 60%-90% of program operation costs, excluding costs of donated medications. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: MDA for LF elimination is comparatively inexpensive in relation to most other public health programs. Governments and communities make the predominant financial contributions to actual MDA implementation, not counting the cost of the drugs themselves. The results highlight the impact of the use of volunteers on program costs and provide specific cost data for 7 different countries that can be used as a basis both for modifying current programs and for developing new ones.


Subject(s)
Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Elephantiasis, Filarial/drug therapy , Albendazole/economics , Albendazole/therapeutic use , Anthelmintics/economics , Burkina Faso/epidemiology , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diethylcarbamazine/economics , Diethylcarbamazine/therapeutic use , Dominican Republic/epidemiology , Drug Therapy/economics , Drug Therapy/methods , Egypt/epidemiology , Elephantiasis/drug therapy , Elephantiasis/prevention & control , Elephantiasis, Filarial/prevention & control , Ghana/epidemiology , Haiti/epidemiology , Humans , Patient Care Team , Philippines/epidemiology , Tanzania/epidemiology
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 73(5): 888-94, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16282299

ABSTRACT

To support the global program to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (LF), well-monitored demonstration projects are important for defining the relationship between coverage and reductions in microfilaremia. We are using mass treatment with diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and albendazole in an effort to eliminate LF from Leogane, Haiti. Wuchereria bancrofti microfilaremia prevalence at baseline ranged from 0.8% to 15.9% in four sentinel sites. After three rounds of DEC-albendazole mass drug administration (MDA), both microfilaremia prevalence and intensity decreased dramatically. Mild and moderate adverse reactions after treatment were common, especially after the first MDA, but decreased after subsequent MDAs. Drug coverage for the first year was estimated to be 72%, but concerns about adverse reactions appeared to decrease drug coverage in the second MDA. As a result of community education efforts that focused on providing a greater understanding of adverse reactions, coverage increased dramatically for the third round. Program efficiency increased substantially; the costs per person treated for three rounds of MDA were 2.23 US dollars, 1.96 US dollars, and 1.30 US dollars per person, respectively. The Leogane experience highlights the importance of adapting community education and mobilization campaigns to achieve and maintain good coverage.


Subject(s)
Albendazole/administration & dosage , Diethylcarbamazine/administration & dosage , Filaricides/administration & dosage , Program Evaluation , Albendazole/economics , Albendazole/therapeutic use , Animals , Diethylcarbamazine/economics , Diethylcarbamazine/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Elephantiasis, Filarial/drug therapy , Elephantiasis, Filarial/economics , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Elephantiasis, Filarial/prevention & control , Filaricides/economics , Filaricides/therapeutic use , Government Programs/economics , Haiti , Health Education , Humans , Microfilariae/drug effects , Microfilariae/growth & development , Sentinel Surveillance , Wuchereria bancrofti/drug effects
4.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 68(5): 568-73, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12812348

ABSTRACT

In October 2000, 71,187 persons were treated for lymphatic filariasis using albendazole and diethylcarbamazine (DEC) or DEC alone in Leogane, Haiti. We documented the frequency of adverse reactions, severity and cost of treatment. Adverse reactions were classified as minor, moderate, or severe. Overall, 24% (17,421) of the treated persons reported one or more adverse reactions. There were 15,916 (91%) minor and 1502 (9%) moderate adverse reaction reports. Men outnumbered women 2:1 in reporting moderate problems. Three patients, representing roughly one in 25,000 persons treated, were hospitalized with severe adverse reactions judged to be treatment-associated by physician review. The cost per person treated for adverse reactions was more than twice the cost per person treated for lymphatic filariasis (dollar 1.60 versus dollar 0.71). Severe adverse reactions to lymphatic filariasis treatment using DEC with or without albendazole are uncommon. Minor and moderate reactions are more commonly reported and their management represents a challenge to lymphatic filariasis elimination programs.


Subject(s)
Albendazole/adverse effects , Anthelmintics/adverse effects , Diethylcarbamazine/adverse effects , Elephantiasis, Filarial/drug therapy , Filaricides/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Albendazole/economics , Albendazole/therapeutic use , Anthelmintics/economics , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Diethylcarbamazine/economics , Diethylcarbamazine/therapeutic use , Elephantiasis, Filarial/economics , Female , Filaricides/economics , Filaricides/therapeutic use , Haiti , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors
5.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 97(5): 501-5, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15307410

ABSTRACT

In the global effort to eliminate lymphatic filariasis, annual mass treatments are conducted with diethylcarbamazine (DEC) or ivermectin, combined with albendazole. The success of this strategy depends on achieving high levels of drug coverage, which reduces the number of persons with circulating microfilariae so that transmission of the parasite is interrupted. Because resources are often limited, a simple, inexpensive, and reliable method to estimate drug coverage is needed. During the period December 2000 to February 2001, three methods were used to assess drug coverage in Leogane Commune, Haiti: a probability survey using a cluster sample design (n = 1421 persons); a distribution-point survey based on a convenience sample of houses near the distribution points (n = 4341 persons); and a survey based on a convenience sample of primary schools (n = 5036 children). The coverage estimations were 71.3% (95% CI 66.7-75.9), 73.6% (95% CI 70.1-77.0), and 77.8% (95% CI 73.5-82.1), respectively. Survey costs for the probability, distribution point, and school surveys were US$2217, US$979, and US$312, respectively. The 2 convenience sampling methods provided point estimates of drug coverage that were similar to those of the probability survey. These methods may have a role for monitoring drug treatment coverage between less frequent, but more costly, probability sample surveys.


Subject(s)
Elephantiasis, Filarial/prevention & control , Filaricides/therapeutic use , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Albendazole/economics , Albendazole/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diethylcarbamazine/economics , Diethylcarbamazine/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Elephantiasis, Filarial/economics , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Filaricides/economics , Haiti/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Ivermectin/economics , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL