Accelerated Dose Escalation with 3 Injections of an Aluminum Hydroxide-Adsorbed Allergoid Preparation of 6 Grasses Is Safe for Children and Adolescents with Moderate to Severe Allergic Rhinitis.

A high-dose, accelerated escalation schedule during subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is safe and well-tolerated in adults. However, there are no data in children and adolescents. The aim of the present trial was to assess safety and tolerability of an accelerated dose escalation schedule of an AIT with a grass pollen allergoid in children and adolescents with moderate to severe seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis in a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II trial. The dose escalation scheme for patients in the One Strength Group included 3 injections with 1 strength B (10,000 TU/mL), whereas the dose escalation scheme for the Standard group included 7 injections with 2 strengths A (1,000 TU/mL) and B (10,000 TU/mL) of an allergoid grass pollen preparation. Overall, n = 50 children (n = 25 in each group; mean age 8.9 + 1.54 years) and n = 37 adolescents (n = 20 and n = 17; 14.2 + 1.62 years) were randomized. For all patients, the mean treatment duration was 59.4 days in the One Strength group and 88.6 days in the Standard group. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to AIT were reported in 52 and 40% in children and 35 and 35.3% in adolescents, respectively. Systemic allergic reactions occurred in about 5% of our patients and were reported in more patients of the One Strength group (6.7 vs. 2.4%). All systemic reactions were classified as WAO Grade 1. Accelerated high-dose escalation with an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed grass pollen allergoid can be initiated with a safety and tolerability profile comparable to the standard dose escalation schedule in children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis with or without asthma.

Immunogenicity of a new allergoid from Felis domesticus.

BACKGROUND: The chemical modification of allergens with glutaraldehyde improves safety while maintaining clinical efficacy, which permits the administration of higher doses of immunotherapy, reducing the risk of adverse reactions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the immunogenic capacity of a new cat dander polymer by immunizing mice and quantifying immunoglobulins in serum, in comparison with the non-modified allergen. METHODS: The study consists of the immunization of three mice groups with the polymerized and the native extract, together with a negative control group. The immunoglobulin levels in serum have been measured by indirect ELISA. By means of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, it was determined if there were significant differences in the values of specific antibodies between groups. RESULTS: The group immunized with the allergoid showed significantly higher specific IgG and IgG1 values to dander allergens and specific IgG to the major allergen Fel d 1, while there were no significant changes in IgG2a and IgE values. These results could be due to a higher immunization dose. The vaccine formulation was based on the optimal defined dose for clinical efficacy of allergen immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This preclinical study carried out with the present assay has established that the allergoid of cat dander extract, as designed for its optimal use in allergen immunotherapy, produces a higher specific IgG than the native extract, in addition to showing significantly higher specific IgG1 levels, evidencing a greater effectiveness in immunization.

The safety of carbamylated monomeric allergoids for sublingual immunotherapy. Data from a pharmacovigilance study.

Aim: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is significantly less concerned by systemic reactions than subcutaneous immunotherapy. Allergoids were introduced to reduce systemic reaction to subcutaneous immunotherapy, but may also be used for SLIT. Methods: This pharmacovigilance study evaluated the post-marketing reports collected in a safety database, including the number and the type (serious or not serious) of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in Italy by SLIT with the carbamylated monomeric allergoid (CMA). Results: More than 15,000,000 CMA tablets were administered, with 25 spontaneous reports of ADRs, only two being serious. Conclusion: The rate of ADRs to CMA we found in this pharmacovigilance survey, corresponding to 0.0004% of all administered doses, is far lower than the rates commonly reported for allergen SLIT products.

Accelerated Dose Escalation with Three Injections of an Aluminum Hydroxide-Adsorbed Allergoid Preparation of Six Grasses Is Safe for Patients with Moderate to Severe Allergic Rhinitis.

Only few data on safety during high-dose, accelerated escalation schedules during subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (AIT) are available. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of an accelerated dose escalation schedule of AIT in adult patients with moderate to severe seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis in a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II trial. The dose escalation scheme for patients in Group I (1 strength) included 3 injections with 1 strength, B (10,000 TU/mL), whereas the dose escalation scheme for Group II (standard) included 7 injections with 2 strengths, A (1,000 TU/mL) and B (10,000 TU/mL), of an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed allergoid grass pollen preparation. Overall, 72 of 87 randomized patients (83.7%) reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; 82.2 [Group I] vs. 85.4% [Group II]); 58.8% of all reported TEAEs were assessed as being related to AIT (60.0 vs. 48.8%). The most frequently reported AIT-related TEAEs were swelling (46.7 vs. 34.1%), erythema (28.9 vs. 36.6%), and pruritus (31.1 vs. 17.1%) at the site of the injection. Systemic allergic reactions occurred in 5 (5.8%) patients overall, with more being reported in the 1-strength group (4 [8.9%] vs. 1 [2.4%]). All systemic allergic reactions were classified as World Allergy Organization (WAO) Grade 1 or Grade 2 reactions. Accelerated high-dose escalation with an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed grass pollen allergoid can be initiated with a safety and tolerability profile comparable to the standard dose escalation schedule in patients with allergic rhinitis with or without asthma.

Year-round treatment initiation for a 6-grasses pollen allergoid in specific immunotherapy of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma.

Aim: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an effective treatment for allergic diseases. We investigate whether treatment-initiation during the pollen season is safe. Methods: RCT-IIIb-trial of 6-grass-pollen-allergoid (Allergovit®) in grass pollen-allergic patients (18-65 years) with moderate-severe rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis (± controlled asthma), randomized 2:1 to treatment-initiation during (Group-A) versus outside the pollen season (Group-B). Results: Of 240 patients (32.8 ± 9.9 years, 19.5% asthma) treated, 84.9% (Group-A) and 86.6% (Group-B) reached maintenance dose without delay. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 108 (68.4%/Group-A) and 41 patients (56.2%/Group-B) leading to premature trial-termination in 11 patients (7%/A) versus 3 (4.1%/B). Across groups, physicians (for 190 patients; 85.2%) and patients (192; 86.1%) rated the tolerability as 'very good'-'good'. Phleum pratense-specific IgG4 increased in both groups (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Year-round allergen immunotherapy-initiation with this preparation is safe.

Fast up-dosing with a birch allergoid is safe and well tolerated in allergic rhinitis patients with or without asthma.

AIM: Subcutaneous immunotherapy is effective in treating allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma, but is still inconvenient when heavy schedules are used. A faster dose escalation is desirable. MATERIALS & METHODS: In this open-label, Phase II trial, 130 adults were randomized 1:1 to receive a birch pollen allergoid subcutaneous immunotherapy. Group I with four weekly injections and Group II with seven weekly injections. Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity were assessed. RESULTS: Mild-to-moderate treatment-related adverse events were reported for 57.7% of the patients (Group I: 36, Group II: 39). Tolerability was assessed by physicians and rated as 'good' or 'very good' for 55 patients in Group I (87.3%) and for 63 patients in Group II (94.0%). Levels of IgG and IgG4 increased before and after treatment significantly (p < 0.0001) in both groups. CONCLUSION: Standard versus fast dose escalation is comparable in terms of safety and tolerability.