Cardiac evaluation in amiodarone-induced thyroid dysfunction with suspected cardiac ischemia?: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Amiodarone-induced thyroid dysfunction (AIT) is a side-effect associated with the use of Amiodarone for the treatment of refractory arrythmias. Resulting hyperthyroidism can precipitate cardiac complications, including cardiac ischemia and myocardial infarction, although this has only been described in a few case reports. CASE PRESENTATION: We present here a clinical scenario involving a 66-year-old male Caucasian patient under Amiodarone for atrial fibrillation, who developed AIT. In the presence of dyspnea, multiple cardiovascular risk factors and ECG abnormalities, a transthoracic echocardiogram was performed, showing inferobasal hypokinesia. This led to further investigations through a cardiac PET-CT, where cardiac ischemia was suspected. Ultimately, the coronary angiography revealed no abnormalities. Nonetheless, these extensive cardiologic investigations led to a delay in initiating an emergency endovascular revascularization for acute-on-chronic left limb ischemia. Although initial treatment using Carbimazole was not successful after three weeks, the patient reached euthyroidism after completion of the treatment with Prednisone so that eventually thyroidectomy was not performed. Endovascular revascularization was finally performed after more than one month. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss here cardiac abnormalities in patients with AIT, which may be due to relative ischemia secondary to increased metabolic demand during hyperthyroidism. Improvement of cardiac complications is expected through an optimal AIT therapy including medical therapy as the primary approach and, when necessary, thyroidectomy. Cardiac investigations in the context of AIT should be carefully considered and may not justify delaying other crucial interventions. If considered mandatory, diagnostic procedures such as coronary angiography should be preferred to functional testing.

The efficacy and safety of intraoperative intravenous amiodarone in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a systemic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intraoperative intravenous amiodarone for arrhythmia prevention in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Wan Fang database until July 1th, 2023. The primary outcomes of interest included the incidences of intra- and post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF), ventricular fibrillation, or any arrhythmia, including atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular contraction, and sinus bradycardia. For continuous and dichotomous variables, treatment effects were calculated as the weighted mean difference (WMD)/risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A database search yielded 7 randomized controlled trials including 608 patients, where three studies, including three treatments (amiodarone, lidocaine, and saline), contributed to the clinical outcome of atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, or any arrhythmia. Meta-analysis demonstrated that amiodarone can significantly reduce the incidence of POAF (RR, 0.39; 95%CI: 0.20, 0.77; P = 0.007, I2 = 0%) in patients undergoing on-pump CABG; there was no statistically significant influence on intra-operative atrial fibrillation, intra- and post-operative ventricular fibrillation, or any arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that intraoperative administration of intravenous amiodarone may be safe and effective in preventing POAF in patients undergoing on-pump CABG. More well-designed clinical trials are needed to validate this result.

Dronedarone for the Treatment of Atrial Arrhythmias in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: Atrial tachyarrhythmias are common and difficult to treat in adults with congenital heart disease. Dronedarone has proven effective in patients without congenital heart disease, but data are limited about its use in adults with congenital heart disease of moderate to great complexity. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective chart review of 21 adults with congenital heart disease of moderate to great complexity who were treated with dronedarone for atrial tachyarrhythmias was performed. RESULTS: The median (IQR) age at dronedarone initiation was 35 (27.5-39) years. Eleven patients (52%) were male. Ten patients (48%) had New York Heart Association class I disease, 10 (48%) had class II disease, and 1 (5%) had class III disease. Ejection fraction at initiation was greater than 55% in 11 patients (52%), 35% to 55% in 9 patients (43%), and less than 35% in 1 patient (5%). Prior treatments included ß-blockers (71%), sotalol (38%), amiodarone (24%), digoxin (24%), and catheter ablation (38%). Rhythm control was complete in 5 patients (24%), partial in 6 (29%), and inadequate in 10 (48%). Two patients (10%) experienced adverse events, including nausea in 1 (5%) and cardiac arrest in 1 (5%), which occurred 48 months after initiation of treatment. There were no deaths during the follow-up period. The median (IQR) follow-up time for patients with complete or partial rhythm control was 20 (1-54) months. CONCLUSION: Dronedarone can be effective for adult patients with congenital heart disease and atrial arrhythmias for whom more established therapies have failed, and with close monitoring it can be safely tolerated.

Warfarin induced spontaneous gastric intramural haematoma presenting with palpitations.

Spontaneous gastric intramural haematoma is an uncommon complication associated with anticoagulant therapy. A patient receiving chronic warfarin for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was admitted due to atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (RVR). An incidental intra-abdominal mass was detected on a CT scan. Following the initiation of the amiodarone infusion, the patient experienced bleeding attributed to warfarin-amiodarone-induced coagulopathy, with no identifiable bleeding source. Subsequent CT scans revealed an enlargement of the intra-abdominal mass, suggesting gastric intramural haematoma. After coagulopathy reversal, the haematoma is managed conservatively. Our case underscores the potential for incidental bleeding even when the international normalised ratio is within the normal range in patients on chronic warfarin therapy. When managing such patients with atrial fibrillation with RVR, physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for bleeding, emphasising the importance of prompt coagulopathy reversal.

Major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with apixaban versus warfarin in combination with amiodarone: nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Amiodarone is an established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) but might interfere with the metabolism of apixaban or warfarin. Therefore, the aim was to investigate the occurrence of major bleeding among patients with AF treated with amiodarone in combination with apixaban or warfarin. METHODS: Retrospective observational study using Swedish health registers. All patients with AF in the National Patient Register and the National Dispensed Drug Register with concomitant use of amiodarone and warfarin or apixaban between 1 June 2013 and 31 December 2018 were included. Propensity score matching was performed, and matched cohorts were compared using Cox proportional HRs. The primary outcome was major bleeding resulting in hospitalisation based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes. Secondary outcomes included intracranial bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding and other bleeding. Exploratory outcomes included ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause/cardiovascular (CV) mortality. RESULTS: A total of 12 103 patients met the inclusion criteria and 8686 patients were included after propensity score matching. Rates of major bleeding were similar in the apixaban (4.3/100 patient-years) and warfarin cohort (4.5/100 patient-years) (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.39) during median follow-up of 4.4 months. Similar findings were observed for secondary outcomes including gastrointestinal bleeding and other bleeding, and exploratory outcomes including ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause/CV mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with amiodarone in combination with apixaban or warfarin, major bleeding and thromboembolic events were rare and with no significant difference between the treatment groups. EUPAS REGISTRY NUMBER: EUPAS43681.

Amiodarone and Dronedarone Causes Liver Injury with Distinctly Different Clinical Presentations.

OBJECTIVE: To describe hepatotoxicity due to amiodarone and dronedarone from the DILIN and the US FDA's surveillance database. METHODS: Hepatotoxicity due to amiodarone and dronedarone enrolled in the U.S. Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) from 2004 to 2020 are described. Dronedarone hepatotoxicity cases associated with liver biopsy results were obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2009 to 2020. RESULTS: Among DILIN's 10 amiodarone and 3 dronedarone DILIN cases, the latency for amiodarone was longer than with dronedarone (388 vs 119 days, p = 0.50) and the median ALT at DILI onset was significantly lower with amiodarone (118 vs 1191 U/L, p = 0.05). Liver biopsies in five amiodarone cases showed fibrosis, steatosis, and numerous Mallory-Denk bodies. Five patients died although only one from liver failure. One patient with dronedarone induced liver injury died of a non-liver related cause. Nine additional cases of DILI due to dronedarone requiring hospitalization were identified in the FAERS database. Three patients developed liver injury within a month of starting the medication. Two developed acute liver failure and underwent urgent liver transplant, one was evaluated for liver transplant but then recovered spontaneously, while one patient with cirrhosis died of liver related causes. CONCLUSION: Amiodarone hepatotoxicity resembles that seen in alcohol related liver injury, with fatty infiltration and inflammation. Dronedarone is less predictable, typically without fat and with a shorter latency of use before presentation. These differences may be explained, in part, by the differing pharmacokinetics of the two drugs leading to different mechanisms of hepatotoxicity.

[Type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis: efficacy of glucocorticoid therapy, a retrospective analysis].

BACKGROUND: Type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis remains a significant problem of endocrinology and cardiology. Due to the increase a life expectancy of the population, the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias and prescribing of amiodarone are increasing. Thyrotoxicosis aggravates the existing cardiovascular disease in patients, leads to the progression of left ventricular dysfunction, relapses of arrhythmias, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes. The tactic of further management of patients is complicated: it is necessary to resolve the issue of canceling or continuing the use of antiarrhythmic drugs necessary for a patient with a history of cardiac arrhythmia, as well as competent therapy of the thyroid pathology that has arisen. Oral glucocorticoids are the first-line drugs for the treatment of patients with moderate and severe type 2  amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis. Despite the appearance of clinical recommendations, opinions on the management of patients are differ, both among cardiologists and among endocrinologists. Often thyrostatics are prescribed to patients simultaneously with glucocorticoids, although it doesn't have pathogenetic basis. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of various therapy options in patients with type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study included 38 patients (20 men and 18 women aged 35 to 85 years) with type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis. All patients underwent an analysis of anamnestic, anthropometric data, complex laboratory and instrumental diagnostics. According to the treatment options, 3 groups were retrospectively formed: without therapy (n=19), taking glucocorticoids (n=11) and combination of glucocorticoids and thyrostatics (n=8). The follow-up period was 6-18 months, including the treatment. The efficacy of treatment in the groups was evaluated by the time of reaching euthyroidism on the background of glucocorticoid therapy and duration of thyrotoxicosis; the search was conducted for potential predictors of delayed response to glucocorticoid therapy and long-term course of thyrotoxicosis. RESULTS: The average age was 62.0 [52.9; 66.3] years. The level of free thyroxine was significantly decreased after 1 month from the start of therapy in both groups: from 38.1 [32.1; 58.4] to 23.4 [19.6; 29.3] pmol/l (p<0.001) in the group taking glucocorticoids; from 73.9 [42.2; 75.6] to 39.3 [22.4; 47.2] pmol/l (p<0.001) in the combination therapy group. The time of reaching euthyroidism was longer in the combination therapy group (p=0.047), didn't depend on the dose (p=0.338) and duration of taking thiamazole (p=0.911), the delayed response to therapy correlated with age (p=-0.857; p=0.007) and time interval from the appearance of clinical symptoms of thyrotoxicosis to the start of glucocorticoid therapy (p=0.881; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate the dependence of glucocorticoid response on the age of the patient and start time of therapy relative to the duration of thyrotoxicosis, inexpediency of additional prescribing thyrostatics in type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis.

Monitoring thyroid function during amiodarone use.

Amiodarone is an antiarrhythmic drug used to treat cardiac tachyarrhythmias. It has many adverse effects, with thyroid dysfunction one of the most notable. Through various mechanisms, both thyrotoxicosis and hypothyroidism can occur secondary to amiodarone therapy. There are two types of amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis: type 1 occurs in those with pre-existing thyroid disease and is treated with thionamide, whereas type 2 occurs in those without and is treated with glucocorticoids. Patients with amiodarone-induced hypothyroidism may be given levothyroxine to replace thyroid hormone, but in some cases, the appropriate management may be cessation of amiodarone.

Amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis: Should surgery be considered?

Amiodarone is the most widely prescribed antiarrhythmic drug worldwide, but induces thyrotoxicosis or hypothyroidism in 15 to 20% of patients. Hyperthyroidism is less frequent than hypothyroidism, and two types of thyrotoxicosis are distinguished according to presence of underlying thyroid disease. Diagnosis is made in case of low TSH and high levels of T3 and T4. Initial treatment is based on anti-thyroid drugs and/or glucocorticoids. Some patients do not respond to medication, which increases the time spent with hyperthyroidism. A long interval between diagnosis and euthyroidism and low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are predictive of major adverse cardiovascular events. Here, after describing the current state of knowledge of amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis, we analyze the literature on the impact of surgery. We suggest that early surgery should be the first option in case of ineffective medical treatment or LVEF<40%. In expert centers, surgical morbidity is no longer different than in other indications for thyroidectomy.

Does amiodarone impact on apixaban levels? The effect of amiodarone on apixaban level among Thai patients with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Apixaban and amiodarone are drugs used for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in routine practice. The evidence about apixaban plasma levels in patients who receive apixaban with amiodarone, including bleeding outcomes, has been limited. This study aimed to compare the apixaban plasma levels and bleeding outcomes between apixaban monotherapy and apixaban with amiodarone groups. METHODS: This study was a prospective, observational, and single-center research which was conducted from January 2021 to January 2022 in NVAF patients who received apixaban at a tertiary care hospital located in the center of Bangkok, Thailand. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were measured for their median (5th-95th percentile) apixaban plasma levels. The trough of apixaban plasma level (Ctrough) were 108.49 [78.10-171.52] and 162.05 [87.94-292.88] µg/L in the apixaban monotherapy and apixaban with amiodarone groups, respectively (p = 0.028). Additionally, the peaks of apixaban plasma level (Cpeak) were 175.36 [122.94-332.34] and 191 [116.88-488.21] µg/L in the apixaban monotherapy and apixaban with amiodarone groups, respectively (p = 0.375). There was bleeding that occurred in 7 patients (21.21%); 5 patients in the apixaban monotherapy group and 2 patients in the apixaban with amiodarone group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone may increase the peaks and troughs of apixaban plasma levels. The co-administration of apixaban with amiodarone is generally well tolerated. However, the careful observation of bleeding symptoms in individual cases is necessary to ensure safety.

The roles of thyroidectomy in patients with amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis: A systematic review.

The principal management of Amiodarone-induced-thyrotoxicosis (AIT) is balancing cardiac-thyroid conditions. However, the role of thyroidectomy is still contentious. This systematic review aims to provide insights into the roles of thyroidectomy in the management of AIT. This systematic review encompasses 303 AIT patients who underwent thyroidectomy from 14 studies. The indication of thyroidectomy can be due to cardiac factors, thyrotoxicosis conditions, and patient-physician considerations. Thyroidectomy is more effective in improving thyroid hormone status, cardiac function, and mortality compared to optimal medical therapy, especially in those with left ventricular ejection fraction < 40 %. Thyroidectomy is effective in improving cardiac function and mortality due to shorter duration for achieving euthyroid. Thyroidectomy and medical therapy have comparable side effects. However, the identification of high-risk patients may reduce thyroidectomy complications. Thus, thyroidectomy should not be viewed as the last resource and should be performed immediately when indicated.

Short review: novel concepts in the approach to patients with amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis.

INTRODUCTION: Amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The approach to this condition is widely variable across different medical specialists and even among expert endocrinologists. As a matter of fact, the approach to amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis has always been considered difficult, due to diagnostic uncertainties easily resulting in missteps, and therapeutic challenges easily resulting in unresponsiveness or slow-responsiveness to the administered drugs. PURPOSE: Our purpose is to review novelties emerged during the last years about this condition, with the aim to provide novel insights on the diagnostic and therapeutic management of this challenging condition.

Encephalitis as an initial presentation of type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis.

We report a case of a woman in her mid-20s presenting with encephalitis as the initial presentation of type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT). She was on amiodarone in view of a history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Symptomatology included acute personality change and focal myoclonic jerks.Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed a non-specific protein count elevation with negative microbiology, virology, autoimmune screen and onconeural antibodies. The electroencephalogram was consistent with a generalised cerebral dysrhythmia. An MRI of the head revealed symmetrical oedema within the motor cortices and a high T2 signal within the cerebellar dentate nuclei, with no restricted diffusion. Blood investigations confirmed thyrotoxicosis with negative antithyroid antibodies. She did not fulfil the criteria for a thyroid storm. Other possible causes of encephalitis were excluded.There was an excellent clinical, laboratory and radiological response to glucocorticoids, suggesting a diagnosis of steroid-responsive encephalitis secondary to type 2-AIT in the absence of a thyroid storm.

Comparison of amiodarone and esmolol for prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation in individuals undergoing heart valve or aortic surgery: a study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Amiodarone and esmolol can help to prevent and treat post-cardiac surgery reperfusion ventricular fibrillation. However, the relative efficacies of these two drugs remain unknown. The aim of the current trial is to compare the performances of amiodarone and esmolol for preventing reperfusion ventricular fibrillation following open heart surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-center, prospective, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. A total of 260 patients undergoing heart valve or aortic surgery will be assigned randomly to treatment with prophylactic esmolol (intervention group) or amiodarone (control group). The main outcome is the incidence of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation following aortic opening during extracorporeal circulation. The secondary outcomes are the rate of automatic cardiac resuscitation, energy and frequency of electrical defibrillation, number of electrical defibrillations, and pacemaker use in the two groups of patients. Information on the patients' general condition and the durations of anesthesia, extracorporeal circulation, aortic occlusion, and operation time will be recorded. We will also compare the heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and central venous pressure between the two groups of patients at induction of anesthesia (T1), start of surgery (T2), start of extracorporeal circulation (T3), aortic block (T4), aortic opening (T5), after opening for 10 (T6), 20 (T7), and 30 min (T8), at cessation of extracorporeal circulation (T9), and at the end of surgery (T10) and compare blood gas analysis results at T1, T5, T9, and T10. DISCUSSION: This study will determine if prophylactic esmolol is more effective than amiodarone for reducing the incidence of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation in patients undergoing heart valve or aortic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: China Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR1900026429. Registered on 2019.10.9.

Monitoring for adverse drug events of high-risk medications with a computerized clinical decision support system: a prospective cohort study.

Monitoring is recommended to prevent severe adverse drug events, but such examinations are often missed. To increase the number of monitoring that should be ordered for high-risk medications, we introduced a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that alerts and orders the monitoring for high-risk medications in an outpatient setting. We conducted a 2-year prospective cohort study at a tertiary care teaching hospital before (phase 1) and after (phase 2) the activation of a CDSS. The CDSS automatically provided alerts for liver function tests for vildagliptin, thyroid function tests for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), and a slit-lamp examination of the eyes for oral amiodarone when outpatients were prescribed the medications but not examined for a fixed period. The order of laboratory tests automatically appeared if alert was accepted. The alerts were hidden and did not appear on the display before activation of the CDSS. The outcomes were the number of prescriptions with alerts and examinations. During the study period, 330 patients in phase 1 and 307 patients in phase 2 were prescribed vildagliptin, 20 patients in phase 1 and 19 patients in phase 2 were prescribed ICIs or MKIs, and 72 patients in phase 1 and 66 patients in phase 2 were prescribed oral amiodarone. The baseline characteristics were similar between the phases. In patients prescribed vildagliptin, the proportion of alerts decreased significantly (38% vs 27%, P < 0.0001), and the proportion of examinations increased significantly (0.9% vs 4.0%, P < 0.0001) after activation of the CDSS. In patients prescribed ICIs or MKIs, the proportion of alerts decreased significantly (43% vs 11%, P < 0.0001), and the proportion of examinations increased numerically, but not significantly (2.6% vs 7.0%, P = 0.13). In patients prescribed oral amiodarone, the proportion of alerts decreased (86% vs 81%, P = 0.055), and the proportion of examinations increased (2.2% and 3.0%, P = 0.47); neither was significant. The CDSS has potential to increase the monitoring for high-risk medications. Our study also highlighted the limited acceptance rate of monitoring by CDSS. Further studies are needed to explore the generalizability to other medications and the cause of the limited acceptance rates among physicians.

Lidocaine as an anti-arrhythmic drug: Are there any indications left?

Lidocaine is classified as a class Ib anti-arrhythmic that blocks voltage- and pH-dependent sodium channels. It exhibits well investigated anti-arrhythmic effects and has been the anti-arrhythmic of choice for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias for several decades. Lidocaine binds primarily to inactivated sodium channels, decreases the action potential duration, and increases the refractory period. It increases the ventricular fibrillatory threshold and can interrupt life-threatening tachycardias caused by re-entrant mechanisms, especially in ischemic tissue. Its use was pushed into the background in the era of amiodarone and modern electric device therapy. Recently, lidocaine has come back into focus for the treatment of acute sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In this brief overview, we review the clinical pharmacology including possible side effects, the historical course, possible indications, and current Guideline recommendations for the use of lidocaine.