Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 449
Filter
2.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 67(S1): S115-S124, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38422401

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA have become the surgical procedure of choice in pediatric patients with medically refractory colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the diagnosis and treatment of pouch disorders in pediatric patients who undergo IPAA. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Embase for all publications describing outcomes of pediatric IPAA. STUDY SELECTION: Studies between January 1, 2000, and September 7, 2022, published in English were included. Studies were excluded on the basis of title, abstract, and full-length review. INTERVENTIONS: IPAA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pouch disorders described include anastomotic leaks, pouch strictures, pouch failure, pouchitis, cuffitis, and de novo Crohn's disease of the pouch. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies were included in this review, all of which were retrospective in nature. The outcomes of 2643 pediatric patients were included in the 33 studies. LIMITATIONS: Management is largely informed by clinical practices in adult patients with scant data on treatment efficacy in children. CONCLUSIONS: The reported incidence of disorders of the pouch in children varies widely and is likely attributable to differences in definitions and follow-up periods across studies. Pouchitis was the most frequently described outcome. The overall rate of pouch failure in children is relatively low, with de novo Crohn's disease of the pouch being the most significant risk factor. Multicenter prospective studies are needed in the pediatric population to accurately identify risk factors, standardize the assessment of pouch complications, and determine effective treatment strategies. See video from the symposium .


Subject(s)
Pouchitis , Proctocolectomy, Restorative , Humans , Proctocolectomy, Restorative/adverse effects , Proctocolectomy, Restorative/methods , Child , Pouchitis/diagnosis , Pouchitis/therapy , Pouchitis/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Colonic Pouches/adverse effects , Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Colitis, Ulcerative/therapy , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/surgery , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/diagnosis , Anastomotic Leak/diagnosis , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Crohn Disease/surgery , Crohn Disease/therapy , Crohn Disease/complications
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 59(3): 432-436, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37949689

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) and esophageal perforation are life-threatening complications following surgery or endoscopic dilations. "Replogle modified EVAC therapy" consists of placing a Replogle tube directly into the lumen or within an abscess cavity and remove by suction all intra-cavity fluids and secretion with a continuous low-pressure suction, promoting granulation tissue proliferation, thereby gradually decreasing the cavity size. The aim of our study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this technique in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective review charts of consecutive pediatric patients that were treated with "Replogle modified EVAC therapy" at our pediatric referral center between 2013 and 2022 was conducted. The clinical, endoscopic, radiological, and surgical information and data of patients were collected and revised as well as their follow-up and outcomes. RESULTS: Ten patients (6/10 male; mean age: 7.8 y.o., range: 1.1-18 y.o.) were treated using the "Replogle modified EVAC therapy". Four out of ten patients developed esophageal perforations after endoscopic procedures. Six out of the ten enrolled patients had AL complications after surgical operations. All patients were successfully treated. There were no technical failures or complications with device placement. Mean treatment duration was 16 days (range 7-41 days). No additional treatment was needed for complete leak resolution. CONCLUSIONS: "Replogle modified EVAC therapy" represents a promising and mini-invasive method to treat esophageal perforations and post-surgical leak in the paediatric age group. In our experience, the use of this technique was safe, effective, and particularly well suited also in complex paediatric patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Perforation , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Humans , Male , Child , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Esophageal Perforation/etiology , Esophageal Perforation/surgery , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Endoscopy/methods , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
Acta Chir Belg ; 124(2): 114-120, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37243696

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the link between anastomotic leaks (AL) and anastomotic strictures (AS) after esophageal atresia surgery and the influence of patient demographics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of neonates who underwent surgical repair for esophageal atresia were retrospectively reviewed. The results of AL treatment and the relationship with AS, also the effects of patient characteristics were examined with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Primary repair was performed on 122 of 125 patients who underwent surgery for esophageal atresia. AL occurred in 25 patients and 21 were treated non-operatively. While 4 patients were re-operated, AL recurred in 3 and led to the death of one. There was no correlation between the development of AL and sex or the presence of additional anomalies. The gestational age and birth weight of patients with AL were significantly higher than those of patients without. AS developed in 45 patients. The mean gestational age was significantly higher in patients who developed AS (p < .001). While the development of AS was significantly higher in patients with AL (p = .001), the number of dilatation sessions needed was also significantly higher in these patients (p = .026). Complications related to anastomosis were less common in patients whose gestational age was ≤33 weeks. CONCLUSION: Non-operative treatment remains effective for AL after esophageal atresia surgery. AL increases the risk of developing AS and significantly increases the number of dilatation sessions needed. Anastomotic complications are less common in patients with lower gestational age.NOVEL ASPECTSGestational age and birth weight were found to be significantly higher in patients with anastomotic leaks than in those without and fewer anastomotic complications were encountered in patients whose gestational age was ≤ 33 weeks.Anastomotic stricture development was significantly higher in patients with anastomotic leaks and the number of dilatation sessions needed for treatment was also significantly higher in these patients.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Atresia , Esophageal Stenosis , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Infant , Esophageal Atresia/surgery , Esophageal Atresia/complications , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Constriction, Pathologic/complications , Esophageal Stenosis/etiology , Esophageal Stenosis/surgery , Birth Weight , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis ; 32(4): 526-535, 2023 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38147605

ABSTRACT

Anastomotic leakage (AL) constitutes a prominent cause of significant morbidity following gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The manifestation of AL typically occurs within 7 to 10 days post-surgery, with reported incidence rates of 5.8-6.7% for open gastrectomy and 3.3-4.1% for laparoscopic gastrectomy. Various predisposing risk factors have been identified, including the individual nutritional status (excluding obesity) and preoperative corticotherapy. Interestingly, the administration of neoadjuvant therapies appears to reduce the AL occurrence. In the context of distal gastrectomies, the rates of AL are comparable between laparoscopic, robotic, and open approaches. The total gastrectomies have higher AL rate compared to distal gastrectomies, which are considered the preferred approach. Prophylactic drainage measures have not demonstrated efficacy in preventing AL. As for postoperative management, conservative treatment is indicated for patients presenting with mild clinical symptoms and increased inflammatory blood tests. This approach involves fasting, enteral or parenteral nutrition, administration of antibiotics, and percutaneous drainage. For small AL, endoscopic therapies such as stents, vacuum therapy, clips, suturing devices, and injections are appropriate treatment options. In cases of high-volume fistulas, severe sepsis or failure of previous therapies, surgical reoperation becomes the ultimate solution.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/complications , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Intestine, Small , Retrospective Studies
6.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 397, 2023 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37831200

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at our center. METHODS: After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who developed an esophageal AL after esophagectomy from August 2016 through July 2022. Data pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, surgical and oncological characteristics, and clinical course were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period, 145 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; 10 (6.9%) developed an AL, diagnosed a median of 7.5 days after surgery, and detected by enteric contents in wound drains (n = 3), endoscopy (n = 3), CT (n = 2), and contrast esophagogram (n = 2). Nine patients (90%) had an increasing white blood cell count and additional signs of sepsis. One asymptomatic patient was identified by contrast esophagography. All patients received enteral nutritional support, intravenous antibiotics, and antifungals. Primary treatment of ALs included endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS; n = 6), surgery (n = 2), and SEMS with endoluminal vacuum therapy (n = 2). One patient required surgery after SEMS placement. The median length of ICU and total hospital stays were 11.5 and 22.5 days, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: The incidence of esophageal ALs at our center is similar to that of other high-volume centers. Most ALs can be managed without surgery; however, ALs remain a significant source of postoperative morbidity despite clinical advancements that have improved mortality.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/diagnosis , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Clin Anesth ; 91: 111280, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37801822

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Postoperative noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) has been recommended to obese patients despite the controversy about its benefit. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was used in this study to compare the effect of different methods of NRS on preventing PPCs in obese patients. DESIGN: This study is a network meta-analysis. SETTING: Post-anesthesia care unit and inpatient ward. PATIENTS: 20 randomized controlled trials involving 1184 obese patients were included in the final analysis. INTERVENTIONS: One of the four NRS techniques, which include continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP), high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), or conventional oxygen therapy (COT), was performed after general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs, e.g., atelectasis, pneumonia, hypoxemia, and respiratory failure. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of oxygen treatment failure and anastomotic leakage, oxygenation index, and length of hospital stay (LOS). RevMan 5.3 and STATA 16.0 were used to analyze the results and any potential bias. MAIN RESULTS: Compared with COT, BiPAP and HFNC were both effective in reducing the occurrence of postoperative atelectasis. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of other PPCs including pneumonia, hypoxemia and respiratory failure between the four NRS techniques. CPAP and HFNC were superior to other techniques in improving oxygenation and shortening LOS respectively. No differences were found in oxygen treatment failure and anastomotic leakage between the patients with different NRS. HFNC ranked the first in five of the eight outcomes (hypoxemia, respiratory failure, treatment failure, anastomotic leakage, LOS) in this review by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). CONCLUSION: Among the four postoperative NRS techniques, HFNC seems to be the optimal choice for obese patients which shows certain advantages in reducing the risk of PPCs and shortening LOS.


Subject(s)
Noninvasive Ventilation , Pneumonia , Pulmonary Atelectasis , Respiratory Insufficiency , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Airway Extubation , Network Meta-Analysis , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Oxygen , Cannula , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/prevention & control , Obesity/complications , Hypoxia/etiology , Pulmonary Atelectasis/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Pneumonia/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
8.
Rev Gastroenterol Peru ; 43(2): 110-115, 2023.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37597224

ABSTRACT

Gastrointestinal postoperative anastomotic leaks and fistulas occur frequently and many are managed surgically; however, endoscopic interventions have shown to improve healing outcomes and length of hospital stay. The experience of vacuum-assisted closure therapy (E-VAC) is described, in complications such as fistulas and postoperative anastomotic leaks, in a gastrointestinal reference center in Colombia. A case series study was carried out in patients with anastomotic leaks and fistulas at different levels of the digestive tract, treated by E-VAC, by the Gastroenterology Service in Colombia, during a period from February 2019 to November 2021. Sociodemographic, clinical and surgical variables were described. 6 cases are described, 4 from lower digestive tract and 2 from upper digestive tract. 83% were men; the mean age was 51.8 years (+/-17.5). The indication for E-VAC was colorectal anastomotic fistula in 66%; the most frequent anatomical location was near the anal region (66%), less frequently at the level of the cardia (16%) and esophagus (16%). The size of the defect was described between 20 and 80% in patients undergoing E-VAC therapy, with an average hospitalization length of stay of 22.5 days, with an average number of exchanges of seven per patient. Anastomotic leaks and fistulas are potentially fatal complications in gastrointestinal surgery. E-VAC therapy has shown to be effective and safe, promoting defect closure and drainage of collections present, also decreasing the length of hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Fistula , Gastroenterology , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Female , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Colombia , Esophagus , Fistula/complications , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
9.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 38(1): 138, 2023 May 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37204614

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The treatment of anastomotic leakage after left colorectal surgery remains challenging. Since its introduction, endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT) has proven to be advantageous, reducing the necessity of surgical revision. The aim of our study is to present our experience with endoscopic treatment of colorectal leakages and to identify potential factors influencing treatment outcome. METHODS: Patients who underwent endoscopic treatment of colorectal leakage were retrospectively analyzed. Primary endpoint was the healing rate and success of endoscopic therapy. RESULTS: We identified 59 patients treated with ENPT between January 2009 and December 2019. The overall closure rate was 83%, whereas only 60% of the patients were successfully treated with ENPT and 23% needed further surgery. The time between diagnosis of leakage and uptake of endoscopic treatment did not influence the closure rate, but patients with chronic fistula (> 4 weeks) showed a significantly higher reoperation rate than those with an acute fistula (94% vs 6%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: ENPT is a successful treatment option for colorectal leakages, which appears to be more favorable when started early. Further studies are still needed to better describe its healing potential, but it deserves an integral role in the interdisciplinary treatment of anastomotic leakages.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Colorectal Surgery , Fistula , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Drainage , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Fistula/etiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology
10.
Updates Surg ; 75(4): 847-854, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37086350

ABSTRACT

Anastomotic leakage is one of the major complications of colorectal surgery, which might lead to reoperation, increased hospital stays, further intervention and mortality. Vacuum-assisted closure by devices such as Endo-SPONGE® produced by (B-Braun Medical B.V.) is currently being used to treat leakage and fistula. In this study, we aimed to assess the handmade vacuum-assisted sponge drain for anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection. This prospective study included 22 patients who had undergone sponge drain placement to treat anastomotic leakage. All patients had anastomotic leaks or defects after left anterior rectal resection (LAR) without ileostomy. They were treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before the surgery and then subjected to rigid recto-sigmoidoscopy for 30 days following the operation. Any sign of leakage, such as perianal and pelvic pain, was immediately identified and followed up with a CT scan and another recto-sigmoidoscopy. Twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study, 12 men (54.5%) and 10 women (47.4%). All patients had received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with an average follow-up of 22.30 ± 3.81. 75% of patients (15 cases) were successfully treated, and 17 patients (85%) underwent successful ostomy closure. Treatment failed in 5 patients (25%), including three men and two women. This study shows that handmade vacuum-assisted sponge drain is a cost-effective method of anastomotic leakage management with efficacy similar to that of Endo-SPONGE®.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Rectal Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Female , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Drainage/methods , Rectum/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies
12.
Endoscopy ; 55(9): 859-864, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36828030

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND : Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is a novel treatment for esophageal perforations. This study aimed to describe initial experience with EVT of esophageal perforations due to iatrogenic cause, Boerhaave syndrome, or other perforations not related to prior upper gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS : Data from patients treated with EVT for esophageal perforation at five hospitals in three European countries, between January 2018 and October 2021, were retrospectively collected. The primary end point was successful defect closure by EVT, with or without the use of other endoscopic treatment modalities. Secondary end points included mortality and adverse events. RESULTS : 27 patients were included (median age 71 years). The success rate was 89 % (24/27, 95 %CI 77-100). EVT failed in three patients: two deceased during EVT (septic embolic stroke, pulmonary embolism) and one underwent esophagectomy due to a persisting defect. Two adverse events occurred: one iatrogenic defect expansion during sponge exchange and one hemorrhage during sponge removal. Median treatment duration was 12 days (interquartile range [IQR] 6-16) with 1 sponge exchange (IQR 1-3). CONCLUSION : EVT is a promising organ-preserving treatment for esophageal perforations, with a success rate of 89 %. More experience with the technique and indications will likely improve success rates.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Perforation , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Humans , Aged , Esophageal Perforation/etiology , Esophageal Perforation/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Iatrogenic Disease , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Treatment Outcome
13.
Surg Endosc ; 37(5): 3657-3668, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36639580

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment of esophageal leaks, mostly by covered stents or endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), has largely improved the clinical outcome in the last decade. However, both techniques suffer from significant limitations. Covered stents are hampered by a high rate of migration and missing functional drainage, whereas endoluminal EVT devices are limited by obstruction of the GI tract. The new design of the VACStent makes it a fully covered stent within a polyurethane sponge cylinder, allowing EVT while stent passage is still open. Initial clinical applications have demonstrated the fundamental concept of the VACStent. METHOD: A prospective multicenter open-label study was performed with the primary endpoint safe practicality, complete leak coverage, and effective suction-treatment of esophageal leaks. Secondary endpoints were prevention of septic conditions, successful leak healing, and complications, in particular stent-migration, local erosions and bleeding. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with different, mostly postoperative anastomotic leaks were enrolled in three centers. A total of 41 VACStents were implanted. The mean number of VACStents per patient was 2.7, with a mean duration of VACStent treatment of 15 days. The primary endpoint was met in all VACStent applications (41/41 implants), resulting in a leak healing rate of 80% (12/15 patients). Septic episodes were prevented in 93% (14/15 patients) and there was no mortality. There were no severe device-related adverse events (SADE) nor significant local bleeding or erosion. Minor stent-dislocation and migration, respectively, was observed in 7%. Oral intake of liquids or food was documented in 87% (13/15 patients). One anastomotic stenosis was seen during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: VACStent treatment is a safe and effective treatment in esophageal leaks which can be covered by the sponge cylinder. Its application was described as easy and resembling that of conventional GI stents, with an impressive clinical success rate comparable to EVT outcomes. The VACStent offers a new option for clinical treatment of critical situations in esophageal perforations and anastomotic sutureline failures.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Perforation , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Humans , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Esophagus/surgery , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Esophageal Perforation/surgery , Stents/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Hemorrhage , Retrospective Studies
14.
Dig Dis ; 41(3): 506-512, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36288720

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the increasing incidence of upper digestive tract tumors, more upper digestive tract surgeries are performed each year, and surgeons have difficulty in the postoperative management of gastrointestinal anastomotic fistula. The use of a new minimally invasive technique, endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure (E-VAC), has increased the success rate of the treatment of gastrointestinal fistula. METHODS: We present 6 cases of gastrointestinal fistula treated in our hospital in 2021: 3 cases of anastomotic fistula after esophageal cancer surgery, 2 cases of anastomotic fistula after gastric cancer surgery, and one case of esophageal rupture after trauma. With E-VAC and other adjuvant treatment measures, the gastrointestinal fistulas were eventually closed or significantly reduced. RESULTS: Both local and systemic infections in all 6 patients were controlled with the use of E-VAC device, resulting in significant reduction or closure of fistulas. CONCLUSION: E-VAC devices can effectively help in the removal of the exudate and necrotic tissue around the fistula, promote the proliferation of granulation tissue, and support closure of the fistula. However, further improvements to the device are needed to improve patient comfort and operational safety.


Subject(s)
Fistula , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract , Humans , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/adverse effects , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Stomach , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Fistula/etiology , Fistula/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/therapy
15.
Surg Endosc ; 36(12): 9169-9178, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35852622

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is an effective treatment option for leakage of the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of quality improvements in EVT management on patients' outcome. METHODS: All patients treated by EVT at our center during 2012-2021 were divided into two consecutive and equal-sized cohorts (period 1 vs. period 2). Over time several quality improvement strategies were implemented including the earlier diagnosis and EVT treatment and technical optimization of endoscopy. The primary endpoint was defined as the composite score MTL30 (mortality, transfer, length-of-stay > 30 days). Secondary endpoints included EVT efficacy, complications, in-hospital mortality, length-of-stay (LOS) and nutrition status at discharge. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were analyzed. During the latter period the primary endpoint MTL30 decreased from 60.8 to 39.0% (P = .006). EVT efficacy increased from 80 to 91% (P = .049). Further, the need for additional procedures for leakage management decreased from 49.9 to 29.9% (P = .013) and reoperations became less frequent (38.0% vs.15.6%; P = .001). The duration of leakage therapy and LOS were shortened from 25 to 14 days (P = .003) and 38 days to 25 days (P = .006), respectively. Morbidity (as determined by the comprehensive complication index) decreased from 54.6 to 46.5 (P = .034). More patients could be discharged on oral nutrition (70.9% vs. 84.4%, P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms the efficacy of EVT for the successful management of UGI leakage. Our quality improvement analysis demonstrates significant changes in EVT management resulting in accelerated recovery, fewer complications and improved functional outcome.


Subject(s)
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Quality Improvement , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract/surgery , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods
16.
Anticancer Res ; 42(6): 3091-3098, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35641294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although occult leakage after colorectal surgery does not usually cause critical illness, it can cause long-term complications that decrease the quality of life of patients. There is currently no established diagnostic, treatment, or follow-up method for occult leakage. We assessed the risk factors of occult leakage and examined the efficacy of drain fluid culture and Gram staining for its early detection and appropriate treatment intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 243 consecutive colorectal cancer patients who underwent resection with reconstruction by the double stapling technique between 2016 and 2020 were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixteen (6.6%) patients had postoperative occult leakage. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative treatment was significantly associated with occult leakage (odds ratio=12.423; 95% confidence interval=4.095 to 17.680; p<0.001). Among the 16 patients, 1 experienced stenosis, and none experienced a fistula or chronic sinus. Drain fluid samples of 34 patients (14.0%) were Gram stainpositive, and those of 76 patients (31.3%) were culturepositive. The positive and negative predictive values of drain fluid culture were 18.4% and 98.7%, respectively, and those of Gram staining were 38.2% and 98.6%, respectively, for occult leakage. Among cases with occult leakage, more than two bacterial species were detected in 71.5% of the cultures. Antibiograms indicated that the three major species tended to be resistant to cephem antibiotics, which are used for prophylaxis, but susceptible to carbapenem antibiotics, which are used for empiric therapy. CONCLUSION: Drain fluid culture and Gram staining may enable early detection and appropriate treatment intervention for occult leakage.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Colorectal Neoplasms , Anastomotic Leak/diagnosis , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Drainage/adverse effects , Humans , Quality of Life , Staining and Labeling
17.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 37(5): 1161-1172, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35469107

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage (AL) continues to be a challenge after restorative rectal resection (RRR). Various treatment options of AL are available; however, their long-term outcomes are uncertain. We explored the impact of AL on the risk of stoma presence 1 year after RRR for rectal cancer and described treatment of AL after RRR including impact on the probability of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and stoma presence following different treatment options of AL. METHODS: We included 859 patients undergoing RRR in Central Denmark Region between 2013 and 2019. Stoma presence was calculated as the proportion of patients with stoma 1 year after RRR. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to estimate the impact of AL on stoma presence adjusting for potential predictors. Descriptive data of outcomes were stratified for various treatment options of AL. RESULTS: The risk of stoma presence 1 year after surgery was 9.8% (95% CI 7.98-12.0). Predictors for having stoma 1 year after RRR were AL (OR 8.43 (95% CI 4.87-14.59)) and low tumour height (OR 3.85 (95% CI 1.22-13.21)). For patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy, the probability of receiving it was 42.9% (95% CI 21.8-66.0) if treated with endo-SPONGE and 71.4% (95% CI 47.8-88.7) if treated with other anastomosis preserving treatment options. The risk of having stoma 1 year after RRR was 33.9% (95% CI 21.8-47.8) for patients treated with endo-SPONGE and 13.5% (95% CI 5.6-25.8) for patients treated with other anastomosis preserving treatment options (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: AL is a strong predictor for stoma presence 1 year after RRR. Patients treated with endo-SPONGE seem to have worse outcomes compared to other anastomosis preserving treatment options.


Subject(s)
Proctectomy , Rectal Neoplasms , Surgical Stomas , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Stomas/adverse effects , Surgical Stomas/pathology
18.
Surg Oncol ; 40: 101708, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092916

ABSTRACT

The safety of colorectal surgery for oncological disease is steadily improving, but anastomotic leakage is still the most feared and devastating complication from both a surgical and oncological point of view. Anastomotic leakage affects the outcome of the surgery, increases the times and costs of hospitalization, and worsens the prognosis in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. Anastomotic leakage has a wide range of clinical features ranging from radiological only finding to peritonitis and sepsis with multi-organ failure. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin have been identified as early predictors of anastomotic leakage starting from postoperative day 2-3, but abdominal-pelvic computed tomography scan is still the gold standard for the diagnosis. Several treatments can be adopted for anastomotic leakage. However, there is not a universally accepted flowchart for the management, which should be individualized based on patient's general condition, anastomotic defect size and location, indication for primary resection and presence of the proximal stoma. Non-operative management is usually preferred in patients who underwent proximal faecal diversion at the initial operation. Laparoscopy can be attempted after minimal invasive surgery and can reduce surgical stress in patients allowing a definitive treatment. Reoperation for sepsis control is rarely necessary in those patients who already have a diverting stoma at the time of the leak, especially in extraperitoneal anastomoses. In patients without a stoma who do not require abdominal reoperation for a contained pelvic leak, there are several treatment options, including laparoscopic diverting ileostomy combined with trans-anal anastomotic tube drainage, percutaneous drainage or recently developed endoscopic procedures, such as stent or clip placement or endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy. We describe the current approaches to treat this complication, as well as the clinical tests necessary to diagnose and provide an effective therapy.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/diagnosis , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Humans
19.
Surg Today ; 52(1): 69-74, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33999269

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to develop a clinical prediction model for prolonged air leak (PAL) after lobectomy for lung cancer using preoperative variables in a large patient dataset from the National Clinical Database (NCD) in Japan. METHODS: The preoperative characteristics of 57,532 and 30,967 patients who had undergone standard lobectomy for lung cancer were derived from the 2014 to 2015 and 2016 NCD datasets, respectively. PAL was defined as air leak persisting ≥ 7 days postoperatively or requiring postoperative interventional treatment, such as pleurodesis or reoperation. Risk models were developed from the 2014 to 2015 dataset and validated using the 2016 dataset. When performing model derivation, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method were applied for parameter selection. RESULTS: The rate of PAL was 4.5% in 2014-2015 and 5.3% in 2016. The age, sex, body mass index, comorbid interstitial pneumonia, smoking habits, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, tumor histology, multiple lung cancer, and tumor location were selected as important variables for PAL. Our risk model for predicting PAL was fair with a concordance index of 0.6895. CONCLUSION: The LASSO-based risk model for PAL after lobectomy provided important preoperative variables for PAL and risk weighting for each variable.


Subject(s)
Air , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Datasets as Topic , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Models, Statistical , Pneumonectomy/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Pleurodesis , Pneumonectomy/adverse effects , Reoperation , Risk Assessment , Time Factors
20.
Surg Today ; 52(2): 330-336, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34223990

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of conservative treatment for chylous leak after tumor surgery and to propose a management algorithm. METHODS: The data of patients with postoperative chylous leak after tumor surgery in our institution between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. In this study, 469 laparotomies, 89 thoracotomies, and 57 cervical excisions were performed for tumor surgery in our institution. RESULTS: Twelve patients with a median age of 4 (IQR, 3-8) years had postoperative chylous leak. All patients received total parenteral nutrition for a median of 13 days. Five patients had intravenous somatostatin for a median of 14 days (IQR, 9-16) to decrease chyle production. Eventually, chylous leak ceased in all patients with conservative treatment and surgical drains were removed after no leak was observed with enteral feeding. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of chylous leak in childhood tumor surgery is approximately 2%. Extended tumor resection and lymph node dissection lead to the injury of the delicate structures that drain chyle. Conservative treatment with total parenteral nutrition and somatostatin seems to be effective. In particular, somatostatin may be used in resistant cases. Conservative treatment can take up to 1 month. The algorithm consists of how to manage postoperative chylous leak in childhood.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Chyle , Neoplasms/surgery , Parenteral Nutrition, Total , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Somatostatin/administration & dosage , Age Factors , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Drainage , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infusions, Intravenous , Laparotomy/adverse effects , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Thoracotomy/adverse effects , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...