Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.861
Filter
1.
Org Biomol Chem ; 22(28): 5797-5802, 2024 07 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946203

ABSTRACT

A practical and efficient synthesis of the C8-C23 fragment of antarlides A-H, incorporating six stereocenters and a conjugated diene, is reported. A strategic combination of synthetic methods, including CBS reduction, Evans' aldol reaction, Keck-Maruoka allylation, and enzymatic resolution, enabled the selective introduction of these stereocenters. Furthermore, the pivotal coupling of key fragments is successfully executed through a Julia-Kocienski olefination reaction, connecting the C8-C14 and C15-C23 subunits.


Subject(s)
Androgen Receptor Antagonists , Stereoisomerism , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/chemical synthesis , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/chemistry , Molecular Structure
2.
Chem Biol Drug Des ; 104(1): e14583, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991995

ABSTRACT

In this work, a series of curcumin derivatives (1a-1h, 2a-2g, and 3a-3c) were synthesized for the suppression of castration-resistant prostate cancer cells. All synthesized compounds were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HRMS, and melting point. The in vitro cytotoxicity study shows that compounds 1a, 1e, 1f, 1h, 2g, 3a, and 3c display similar or enhanced cytotoxicity against 22Rv1 and C4-2 cells as compared to ASC-J9, other synthesized compounds display reduced cytotoxicity against 22Rv1 and C4-2 cells as compared to ASC-J9. Molecular docking simulation was performed to study the binding affinity and probable binding modes of the synthesized compounds with androgen receptor. The results show that all synthesized compounds exhibit higher cdocker interaction energies as compared to ASC-J9. Compounds 1h, 2g, and 3c not only show strong cytotoxicity against 22Rv1 and C4-2 cells but also exhibit high binding affinity with androgen receptor. In androgen receptor suppression study, compounds 1f and 2g show similar androgen receptor suppression effect as compared to ASC-J9 on C4-2 cells, compound 3c displays significantly enhanced AR suppression effect as compared to ASC-J9, 1f and 2g. Compounds 1a, 1e, 1f, 1h, 2g, 3a and 3c prepared in this work have significant potential for castration-resistant prostate cancer therapy.


Subject(s)
Curcumin , Molecular Docking Simulation , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Receptors, Androgen , Curcumin/pharmacology , Curcumin/chemistry , Curcumin/chemical synthesis , Curcumin/metabolism , Male , Humans , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Receptors, Androgen/chemistry , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/chemical synthesis , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/chemistry , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/chemical synthesis , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/metabolism , Binding Sites , Protein Binding
3.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(13)2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39000047

ABSTRACT

Metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial dynamics are pivotal in prostate cancer (PCa) progression and treatment resistance, making them essential targets for therapeutic intervention. In this study, we investigated the effects of the androgen receptor antagonist apalutamide (ARN) and the mitochondrial electron transport chain complex I inhibitor IACS-010759 (IACS) on the mitochondrial network architecture and dynamics in PCa cells. Treatment with ARN and/or IACS induced significant changes in mitochondrial morphology, particularly elongation, in androgen-sensitive PCa cells. Additionally, ARN and IACS modulated the mitochondrial fission and fusion processes, indicating a convergence of metabolic and androgen-signaling pathways in shaping mitochondrial function. Notably, the combination treatment with ARN and IACS resulted in increased apoptotic cell death and mitochondrial oxidative stress selectively in the androgen-sensitive PCa cells. Our findings highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting mitochondrial metabolism in prostate cancer and emphasize the need for further mechanistic understanding to optimize treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis , Electron Transport Complex I , Mitochondria , Prostatic Neoplasms , Reactive Oxygen Species , Thiohydantoins , Humans , Male , Mitochondria/metabolism , Mitochondria/drug effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Thiohydantoins/pharmacology , Thiohydantoins/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Electron Transport Complex I/metabolism , Electron Transport Complex I/antagonists & inhibitors , Mitochondrial Dynamics/drug effects , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use
4.
Nagoya J Med Sci ; 86(2): 169-180, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38962407

ABSTRACT

Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors combined with androgen deprivation therapy have become the standard of care for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), regardless of tumor volume or risk. However, survival of approximately one-third of these patients has not improved, necessitating further treatment escalation. On the other hand, for patients with oligometastatic mCSPC, there is an emerging role for local radiation therapy. Although data remain scarce, it is expected that treatment of both primary tumor as well as metastasis-directed therapy may improve survival outcomes. In these patients, systemic therapy may be de-escalated to intermittent therapy. However, precise risk stratification is necessary for risk-based treatment escalation or de-escalation. In addition to risk stratification based on clinical parameters, research has been conducted to incorporate genomic and/or transcriptomic data into risk stratification. In future, an integrated risk model is expected to precisely stratify patients and guide treatment strategies. Here, we first review the transition of the standard treatment for mCSPC over the last decade and further discuss the newest concept of escalating or de-escalating treatment using a multi-modal approach based on the currently available literature.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Metastasis , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use
5.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(6): 433-437, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834220

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clascoterone cream 1% is a topical androgen receptor inhibitor approved to treat acne vulgaris in patients =>12 years of age. This report provides details of patients who developed laboratory signs of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression without clinical signs of adrenal suppression during the clascoterone development program. METHODS: Two open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 trials evaluated HPA axis suppression in patients with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris. Study 1 (NCT01831960) enrolled cohorts of adults =>18 years of age and adolescents =>12 to <18 years of age. Study 2 (NCT02720627) enrolled adolescents 9 to <12 years of age. Patients applied clascoterone twice daily at maximum-exposure dosages for 14 days. Adrenal suppression was evaluated via cosyntropin stimulation test (CST) at baseline and day 14. Patients with an abnormal CST result (serum cortisol level =<18 µg/dL) had a follow-up CST approximately 4 weeks later. Blood was collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. Other safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical examination/vital signs, and electrocardiography. RESULTS: Overall, 5/69 clascoterone-treated patients had an abnormal CST result on day 14, including 1/20 adults, 2/22 patients aged =>12 to <18 years, and 2/27 patients aged 9 to <12 years. All patients had normal cortisol levels at follow-up testing approximately 4 weeks later. No relationship was observed between abnormal CST results and clascoterone plasma concentrations or the amount of study drug applied. No clinically relevant AEs or clinically significant changes in safety measures were observed in patients with adrenal suppression. CONCLUSION: Clascoterone induced laboratory evidence of mild, reversible HPA axis suppression under maximum-use exposure. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):433-437.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7997.


Subject(s)
Acne Vulgaris , Hydrocortisone , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System , Pituitary-Adrenal System , Humans , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/drug effects , Pituitary-Adrenal System/drug effects , Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Adolescent , Male , Female , Adult , Child , Young Adult , Hydrocortisone/blood , Cortodoxone/administration & dosage , Cortodoxone/analogs & derivatives , Cortodoxone/blood , Administration, Cutaneous , Skin Cream/administration & dosage , Skin Cream/adverse effects , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Cosyntropin/administration & dosage , Propionates
6.
Talanta ; 277: 126358, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879944

ABSTRACT

Ambient ionization mass spectrometry allows for analysis of samples in their natural state, i.e., with no sample pre-treatment. It can be viewed as a fast, simple, and economical analysis, but its main disadvantages include a lower analytical performance due to the presence of complex sample matrix and the lack of chromatographic separation prior to the introduction of the sample into the mass spectrometer. Here we present an application of two ambient ionization mass spectrometry techniques, i.e., Desorption Atmospheric Pressure Photoionization and Dielectric Barrier Discharge Ionization, for the analysis of known Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators, which represent common compounds of abuse in professional and semiprofessional sport. Eight real samples of illegal food supplements, seized by the local law enforcement, were used to test the performance of the ambient mass spectrometry and the results were validated against a newly developed targeted LC-UV-MS/MS method performed in multiple reaction monitoring mode with an external calibration for each analyte. In order to decide whether or not the compound can be declared as present, we proposed a system of rules for the interpretation of the obtained spectra. The criteria are based on mass spectrum matching (5-10 ppm accuracy from the theoretical exact mass and a correct isotopic pattern), duration of the mass signal (three or five consecutive scans, depending on the instrumentation used), and intensity above the background noise (threefold increase in intensity and absolute intensity above 5E4 or 1E5, depending on the instrumentation). When applying these criteria, good agreement was found between the tested methods. Ambient ionization techniques were effective at detecting SARMs at pharmacologically relevant doses, i.e., approximately above 1 mg per capsule, although they may fail to detect lower levels or isomeric species. It is demonstrated that when adhering to a set of clear and consistent rules, ambient mass spectrometry can be employed as a qualitative technique for the screening of illegal SARMs with sufficient confidence and without the necessity to perform a regular LC-MS analysis.


Subject(s)
Receptors, Androgen , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Doping in Sports/prevention & control , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Dietary Supplements/analysis , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/analysis , Humans , Chromatography, Liquid/methods
8.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 200: 104420, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38906514

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Genitourinary cancers (GUCs) encompass malignancies affecting the urinary and reproductive systems, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), and prostate cancer (PC). With the rapidly evolving therapeutic domain of these cancers, cutaneous adverse events (AEs) remain among the most observed toxicities. OBJECTIVE: To explore the dermatologic AEs linked to novel GUC treatments, their underlying pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and risk factors. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A narrative review of the literature from PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. The search strategy included dermatologic/cutaneous adverse events, risk factors, and pathophysiology in conjunction with the following classes of therapies; immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antiangiogenic therapies, enfortumab vedotin (EV), erdafitinib, and androgen receptor antagonists (ARAs). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Maculopapular rash, pruritus, and alopecia are present among the five classes of therapies. ICIs demonstrate the highest incidence of severe drug AEs including Steven Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Unique cutaneous AEs present with specific therapies including hand-foot skin reaction and subungual splinter hemorrhage with antiangiogenic drugs, stomatitis/mucositis and onycholysis with erdafitinib. Incidence and type of cutaneous AE also differed within therapies in the same class as seen with apalutamide displaying the highest risk of cutaneous AEs within ARAs. Risk factors for development of cutaneous AEs can be general to therapies, or specific, and include age, immune status, BMI, and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologic AEs may impact patients' quality of life and increase the tendency to dose reduce, hold or discontinue life-saving therapies, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring, early recognition, and collaborative management between medical oncologists, pharmacists, dermatologists and other specialists.


Subject(s)
Urogenital Neoplasms , Humans , Urogenital Neoplasms/drug therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Drug Eruptions/therapy , Drug Eruptions/epidemiology , Drug Eruptions/diagnosis , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Skin Diseases/etiology , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal
9.
Tokai J Exp Clin Med ; 49(2): 82-84, 2024 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904239

ABSTRACT

Recently, effectiveness of local treatment for oncological outcomes for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PC) has been reported. We performed hemi-ablation with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for a patient with a localized reducted solitary lesion in the prostate, which was diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided target biopsy with PSA level of 0.24 ng/mL, after androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) and chemotherapy for metastatic PC. Prostate specific antigen levels decreased to 0.01ng/mL at 1 month after the treatment, and cancer suspicious lesion disappeared on MRI. During the follow-up of 24 months, there was no elevation of PSA level with no severe complication related to the treatment. HIFU has possibility to be an effective and minimally invasive treatment as a local treatment for the localized reducted solitary lesion in the prostate after ARSIs and chemotherapy for metastatic PC.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Aged , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Prostate/pathology , Prostate/diagnostic imaging
10.
JAMA Oncol ; 10(7): 874-884, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842801

ABSTRACT

Importance: Cardiovascular (CV) events remain a substantial cause of mortality among men with advanced and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). The introduction of novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) has transformed the treatment landscape of PCa in recent years; however, their associated CV toxic effects remains unclear. Objective: To assess the incidence of CV events with addition of ARSI to standard of care (SOC) in locally advanced (M0) and metastatic (M1) PCa. Data Sources: Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were performed from inception up to May 2023. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials of ARSI agents (abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, enzalutamide) that reported CV events among individuals with M0 and M1, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Data Extraction and Synthesis: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidance. Two authors screened and independently evaluated studies eligible for inclusion. Data extraction and bias assessment was subsequently performed. Main Outcomes and Measures: A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate risk ratios for the incidence of all grade and grade 3 or higher CV events (primary outcomes), in addition to hypertension, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), cardiac dysrhythmia, CV death, cerebrovascular event, and venous thromboembolism (secondary outcomes). Sources of heterogeneity were explored using meta-regression. Results: There were 24 studies (n = 22 166 patients; median age range, 63-77 years; median follow-up time range, 3.9-96 months) eligible for inclusion. ARSI therapy was associated with increased risk of all grade CV event (risk ratio [RR], 1.75; 95% CI, 1.50-2.04; P < .001) and grade 3 or higher CV events (RR, 2.10; 95%, 1.72-2.55; P < .001). ARSI therapy also was associated with increased risk for grade 3 or higher events for hypertension (RR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.74-2.90; P < .001), ACS (RR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.43-1.60; P < .01), cardiac dysrhythmia (RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.23-2.17; P < .001), cerebrovascular events (RR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.34-2.59; P < .001) and for CV-related death (RR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.32-3.10; P = .001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated increased risk of all CV events across the disease spectrum (M0 HSPC: RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.36-3.75; P = .002; M1 HSPC: RR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.47-2.31; P < .001; M0 CRPC: RR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.13-2.81; P = .01; M1 CRPC: RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16-1.83; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that the addition of ARSIs to traditional ADT was associated with increased risk of CV events across the prostate cancer disease spectrum. These results suggest that patients with prostate cancer should be advised about and monitored for the potential of increased risk of CV events with initiation of ARSI therapy alongside conventional hormonal therapy.


Subject(s)
Androgen Receptor Antagonists , Cardiovascular Diseases , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
11.
Pharmacol Res ; 205: 107234, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38815882

ABSTRACT

After the initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), part of the prostate cancer may continuously deteriorate into castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The majority of patients suffer from the localized illness at primary diagnosis that could rapidly assault other organs. This disease stage is referred as metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Surgery and radiation are still the treatment of CRPC, but have some adverse effects such as urinary symptoms and sexual dysfunction. Hormonal castration therapy interfering androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway is indispensable for most advanced prostate cancer patients, and the first- and second-generation of novel AR inhibitors could effectively cure hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). However, the resistance to these chemical agents is inevitable, so many of patients may experience relapses. The resistance to AR inhibitor mainly involves AR mutation, splice variant formation and amplification, which indicates the important role in CRPC. Proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC), a potent technique to degrade targeted protein, has recently undergone extensive development as a biological tool and therapeutic drug. This technique has the potential to become the next generation of antitumor therapeutics as it could overcome the shortcomings of conventional small molecule inhibitors. In this review, we summarize the molecular mechanisms on PROTACs targeting AR signaling for CRPC, hoping to provide insights into drug development and clinical medication.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Proteolysis , Receptors, Androgen , Signal Transduction , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Male , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Animals , Proteolysis/drug effects , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Proteolysis Targeting Chimera
12.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 20(6): 491-502, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778707

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The therapeutic scenario of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has dramatically changed in recent years, with the approval of new-generation Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSIs), in combination with the androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which was the previous standard of care. Despite showing a similar clinical efficacy, ARSIs, all of which are administered orally, are different in terms of pharmacokinetic and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). AREAS COVERED: This review covers the main pharmacokinetic characteristics of ARSIs that have been approved for the first-line therapy of mHSPC patients, underlying the differences among these molecules and focusing on the known or possible interactions with other drugs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed. EXPERT OPINION: Since prostate cancer occurs mainly in older age, comorbidities and the consequent polypharmacy increase the DDI risk in mHSPC patients who are candidates for ARSI. Waiting for new therapeutic options, in the absence of direct comparisons, pharmacokinetic knowledge is essential to guide clinicians in prescribing ARSI in this setting.


Subject(s)
Androgen Receptor Antagonists , Drug Interactions , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prostatic Neoplasms , Signal Transduction , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Polypharmacy , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/administration & dosage , Androgen Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Androgen Antagonists/pharmacology , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Administration, Oral , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacology , Animals
13.
Free Radic Biol Med ; 221: 81-88, 2024 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762061

ABSTRACT

Androgen receptor (AR)-targeting therapy induces oxidative stress in prostate cancer. However, the mechanism of oxidative stress induction by AR-targeting therapy remains unclear. This study investigated the mechanism of oxidative stress induction by AR-targeting therapy, with the aim to develop novel therapeutics targeting oxidative stress induced by AR-targeting therapy. Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) was examined by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry analysis. The effects of silencing gene expression and small molecule inhibitors on gene expression and cytotoxic effects were examined by quantitative real-time PCR and cell proliferation assay. ROS induced by androgen depletion co-localized with peroxisomes in prostate cancer cells. Among peroxisome-related genes, PPARA was commonly induced by AR inhibition and involved in ROS production via PKC signaling. Inhibition of PPARα by specific siRNA and a small molecule inhibitor suppressed cell proliferation and increased cellular sensitivity to the antiandrogen enzalutamide in prostate cancer cells. This study revealed a novel pathway by which AR inhibition induced intracellular ROS mainly in peroxisomes through PPARα activation in prostate cancer. This pathway is a promising target for the development of novel therapeutics for prostate cancer in combination with AR-targeting therapy such as antiandrogen enzalutamide.


Subject(s)
Benzamides , Cell Proliferation , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Nitriles , Oxidative Stress , Peroxisomes , Phenylthiohydantoin , Prostatic Neoplasms , Receptors, Androgen , Humans , Male , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Benzamides/pharmacology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Nitriles/pharmacology , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Peroxisomes/metabolism , Peroxisomes/drug effects , Phenylthiohydantoin/pharmacology , PPAR alpha/metabolism , PPAR alpha/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , Signal Transduction/drug effects
14.
Bioorg Chem ; 148: 107433, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754311

ABSTRACT

Second-generation AR antagonists, such as enzalutamide, are the primary therapeutic agents for advanced prostate cancer. However, the development of both primary and secondary drug resistance leads to treatment failures and patient mortality. Bifunctional agents that simultaneously antagonize and degrade AR block the AR signaling pathway more completely and exhibit excellent antiproliferative activity against wild-type and drug-resistant prostate cancer cells. Here, we reported the discovery and optimization of a series of biphenyl derivatives as androgen receptor antagonists and degraders. These biphenyl derivatives exhibited potent antiproliferative activity against LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells. Our discoveries enrich the diversity of small molecule AR degraders and offer insights for the development of novel AR degraders for the treatment of enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Androgen Receptor Antagonists , Antineoplastic Agents , Benzamides , Biphenyl Compounds , Cell Proliferation , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Nitriles , Phenylthiohydantoin , Prostatic Neoplasms , Receptors, Androgen , Humans , Male , Benzamides/pharmacology , Benzamides/chemistry , Benzamides/chemical synthesis , Nitriles/chemistry , Nitriles/pharmacology , Phenylthiohydantoin/pharmacology , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Phenylthiohydantoin/chemistry , Biphenyl Compounds/pharmacology , Biphenyl Compounds/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents/chemical synthesis , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Structure-Activity Relationship , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Molecular Structure , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/chemistry , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/chemical synthesis , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Drug Discovery , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Cell Line, Tumor
15.
JAMA Oncol ; 10(6): 807-820, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722620

ABSTRACT

Importance: Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is currently an incurable disease. Despite a high response rate to androgen-deprivation therapy, most cases progress to castration-resistant disease, the terminal phase. This review provides a summary of the most recent evidence for current and emerging management strategies, including treatment intensification with combinations of therapies. It also provides recommendations on applying the evidence in clinical practice to encourage appropriate treatment to improve survival outcomes among patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Observations: Androgen-deprivation therapy is the backbone of treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; however, it is insufficient alone to provide sustained disease control and long-term survival. Addition of an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and/or docetaxel significantly improves survival, as demonstrated by several international phase 3 randomized clinical trials. Triplet therapy composed of androgen-deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor plus docetaxel has been shown to improve overall survival over androgen-deprivation therapy plus docetaxel. In the ARASENS trial (darolutamide), the hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.57-0.80) in the overall population; 0.71 (95% CI, 0.59-0.85) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.35-1.05) in patients with de novo and recurrent disease, respectively; 0.69 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.41-1.13) in patients with high-volume and low-volume disease, respectively; and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.86) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.42-0.90) in patients with high-risk and low-risk disease, respectively. In the PEACE-1 trial (abiraterone acetate + prednisone), the HRs were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.95; all de novo) in the overall population and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.55-0.95) and immature in the high-volume and low-volume subgroups, respectively. In the ENZAMET trial (enzalutamide), the HRs were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63-1.06) in the overall population; 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55-0.99) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.65-1.86) in the de novo and recurrent subgroups, respectively; and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66-1.17) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.33-1.10) in the high-volume and low-volume subgroups. Combination regimens are generally well tolerated, with adverse effects dependent on the profiles of the component drugs. Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this review show compelling evidence from phase 3 randomized clinical trials in favor of initiating triplet combination therapy for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer for the best overall survival. Patients who are eligible for chemotherapy should be offered androgen-deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor plus docetaxel, particularly patients with high-volume, high-risk, or de novo metastatic disease.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Metastasis , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/administration & dosage
16.
South Med J ; 117(5): 245-253, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701845

ABSTRACT

Androgen deprivation therapy is the cornerstone of systemic management for prostate cancer but is associated with multiple adverse effects that must be considered during treatment. These effects occur because of the profound hypogonadism that is induced from lack of testosterone or due to the medications used in the treatment or in combination with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. This article critically reviews the associations between androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors, and cardiovascular complications such as prolonged QT interval, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease. These unfavorable outcomes reinforce the need for regular cardiovascular screening of patients undergoing androgen deprivation for the management of prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Cardiovascular Diseases , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Hypogonadism/drug therapy , Hypogonadism/physiopathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Signal Transduction/drug effects
17.
Curr Opin Oncol ; 36(3): 164-168, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573205

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) after unsuccessful curative therapies frequently have an indolent and asymptomatic disease course for years. There are no prospective data showing that treating BCR improves overall survival despite new imaging strategies and emerging therapeutic data. Managing BCR requires a unique perspective in oncology that balances toxicities and disease kinetics. RECENT FINDINGS: Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging is now widely available and can define subclinical disease in patients with BCR who otherwise have negative CT and bone scans, but limited data exists showing that treating PSMA-positive disease has long term impact. A phase 3 trial demonstrated that the androgen receptor pathway inhibitor enzalutamide either alone or with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was superior in delaying metastasis, relative to ADT alone. Survival benefits from this study remain unknown. SUMMARY: BCR is a heterogeneous population where overtreatment may present greater risk to patients than a disease course that is often indolent. Management of BCR should be individualized based on disease kinetics. Given the unique biology of BCR, future therapeutic research should emphasize an approach that alters disease trajectory without accompanying side effects and should explore options beyond ADT-based strategies.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Disease Progression , Androgen Receptor Antagonists , Positron-Emission Tomography
18.
Cell Commun Signal ; 22(1): 219, 2024 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589887

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignancy in men worldwide, ranking as the second leading cause of cancer-related death in Western countries. Various PCa hormone therapies, such as androgen receptor (AR)-antagonists or supraphysiological androgen level (SAL) reduce cancer cell proliferation. However, treated cells may influence the growth of neighboring cells through secreted exosomes in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, the change of protein content of exosomes secreted from PCa cells through treatment with different AR-antagonists or SAL has been analyzed. METHODS: Isolation of exosomes via ultracentrifugation of treated human PCa LNCaP cells with AR-agonist and various AR-antagonists; analysis of cellular senescence by detection of senescence associated beta galactosidase activity (SA ß-Gal); Western blotting and immunofluorescence staining; Mass spectrometry (MS-spec) of exosomes and bioinformatic analyses to identify ligand-specific exosomal proteins. Growth assays to analyze influence of exosomes on non-treated cells. RESULTS: MS-spec analysis identified ligand-specific proteins in exosomes. One thousand seventy proteins were up- and 52 proteins downregulated by SAL whereas enzalutamide upregulated 151 proteins and downregulated 42 exosomal proteins. The bioinformatic prediction indicates an up-regulation of pro-proliferative pathways. AR ligands augment hub factors in exosomes that include AKT1, CALM1, PAK2 and CTNND1. Accordingly, functional assays confirmed that the isolated exosomes from AR-ligand treated cells promote growth of untreated PCa cells. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that the cargo of exosomes is controlled by AR-agonist and -antagonists and distinct among the AR-antagonists. Further, exosomes promote growth that might influence the TME. This finding sheds light into the complex interplay between AR signaling and exosome-mediated communication between PCa cells.


Subject(s)
Exosomes , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Androgen Receptor Antagonists , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Exosomes/metabolism , Ligands , Cell Line, Tumor , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Androgens , Tumor Microenvironment
19.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 29(6): 716-725, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582807

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Triplet therapy, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) plus docetaxel plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), is a novel guideline-recommended treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the optimal selection of the patient most likely to benefit from triplet therapy remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis to assess the oncologic benefit of triplet therapy in mHSPC patients stratified by disease volume and compare them with doublet treatment regimens. Three databases and meeting abstracts were queried in March 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating patients treated with systemic therapy for mHSPC stratified by disease volume. Primary interests of measure were overall survival (OS). We followed the PRISMA guideline and AMSTAR2 checklist. RESULTS: Overall, eight RCTs were included for meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (NMAs). Triplet therapy outperformed docetaxel plus ADT in terms of OS in both patients with high-(pooled HR: 0.73, 95%CI 0.64-0.84) and low-volume mHSPC (pooled HR: 0.71, 95%CI 0.52-0.97). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with low- vs. high-volume in terms of OS benefit from adding ARSI to docetaxel plus ADT (p = 0.9). Analysis of treatment rankings showed that darolutamide plus docetaxel plus ADT (90%) had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with high-volume disease, while enzalutamide plus ADT (84%) had the highest in with low-volume disease. CONCLUSIONS: Triplet therapy improves OS in mHSPC patients compared to docetaxel-based doublet therapy, irrespective of disease volume. However, based on treatment ranking, triplet therapy should preferably be considered for patients with high-volume mHSPC while those with low-volume are likely to be adequately treated with ARSI + ADT.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Docetaxel , Network Meta-Analysis , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Tumor Burden
20.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 126: 102726, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38613872

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains incurable and develops from biochemically recurrent PC treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) following definitive therapy for localized PC, or from metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC). In the mCSPC setting, treatment intensification of ADT plus androgen receptor (AR)-signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), with or without chemotherapy, improves outcomes vs ADT alone. Despite multiple phase 3 trials demonstrating a survival benefit of treatment intensification in PC, there remains high use of ADT monotherapy in real-world clinical practice. Prior studies indicate that co-inhibition of AR and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) may result in enhanced benefit in treating tumors regardless of alterations in DNA damage response genes involved either directly or indirectly in homologous recombination repair (HRR). Three recent phase 3 studies evaluated the combination of a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) with an ARSI as first-line treatment for mCRPC: TALAPRO-2, talazoparib plus enzalutamide; PROpel, olaparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP); and MAGNITUDE, niraparib plus AAP. Results from these studies have led to the recent approval in the United States of talazoparib plus enzalutamide for the treatment of mCRPC with any HRR alteration, and of both olaparib and niraparib indicated in combination with AAP for the treatment of mCRPC with BRCA alterations. SUMMARY: Here, we review the newly approved PARPi plus ARSI treatments within the context of the mCRPC treatment landscape, provide an overview of practical considerations for the combinations in clinical practice, highlight the importance of HRR testing, and discuss the benefits of treatment intensification for patients with mCRPC.


Subject(s)
Androgen Receptor Antagonists , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Nitriles , Piperazines , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Humans , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Male , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Piperazines/administration & dosage , Phthalazines/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , United States , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Benzamides/therapeutic use , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Indazoles/therapeutic use , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Recombinational DNA Repair/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL