Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 15.836
Filter
1.
Open Heart ; 11(1)2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724266

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Myocardial revascularisation and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can cause ischaemia-reperfusion injury, leading to myocardial and other end-organ damage. Volatile anaesthetics protect the myocardium in experimental studies. However, there is uncertainty about whether this translates into clinical benefits because of the coadministration of propofol and its detrimental effects, restricting myocardial protective processes. METHODS: In this single-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled feasibility trial, higher-risk patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with an additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation ≥5 were randomised to receive either propofol or total inhalational anaesthesia as single agents for maintenance of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the feasibility of recruiting and randomising 50 patients across two cardiac surgical centres, and secondary outcomes included the feasibility of collecting the planned perioperative data, clinically relevant outcomes and assessments of effective patient identification, screening and recruitment. RESULTS: All 50 patients were recruited within 11 months in two centres, allowing for a 13-month hiatus in recruitment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, 50/108 (46%) of eligible patients were recruited. One patient withdrew before surgery and one patient did not undergo surgery. All but one completed in-hospital and 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to recruit and randomise higher-risk patients undergoing CABG surgery to a study comparing total inhalational and propofol anaesthesia in a timely manner and with high acceptance and completion rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04039854.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Intravenous , Coronary Artery Bypass , Feasibility Studies , Propofol , Humans , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/adverse effects , Male , Female , Pilot Projects , Aged , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods , Anesthesia, Inhalation/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/methods
2.
Arch Esp Urol ; 77(3): 235-241, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715163

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the influence of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) compared to combined intravenous and inhalation anaesthesia (CIIA) in paediatric patients undergoing renal biopsy. METHODS: A total of 86 children with nephrotic syndrome, acute glomerulonephritis, chronic glomerulonephritis, IgG nephropathy, systemic lupus erythematosus and purpura nephritis were selected from January 2018 to January 2023 in our hospital. All children were divided into the total intravenous anaesthesia group and intravenous inhalational anaesthesia group according to the anaesthesia method. The experimental group comprised 46 children with renal diseases who underwent static aspiration compound anaesthesia during renal biopsy at our hospital from January 2018 to January 2023. Conversely, the control group included 40 children with renal diseases who underwent total intravenous anaesthesia during renal biopsy at the hospital within the same period. Hemodynamic parameters, such as mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SPO2), were assessed at four different time points: Before anesthesia induction (T0), during anesthesia induction (T1), after anesthesia induction (T2), and at the conclusion of the surgery (T3). Puncture success rate, time to renal puncture, time to get out of bed, postoperative recovery from anaesthesia (including time to postoperative awakening and time to return to spontaneous respiration) and incidence of adverse anaesthetic reactions were also included. RESULTS: We observed notable variations in HR and MAP at T2 and T3, as well as SPO2 levels, duration of awakening from anaesthesia and time taken to resume spontaneous respiration between the two groups at T2 (p < 0.05). No statistically significant variances were detected between the two groups concerning adverse reactions to anaesthesia, puncture success rate, duration to renal puncture and time to mobilisation from bed (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, compared with the total intravenous anaesthesia, the implementation of the sedation-aspiration-combined anaesthesia in renal biopsy in children with renal disease features less haemodynamic fluctuation, better postoperative anaesthesia recovery and does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Inhalation , Anesthesia, Intravenous , Kidney , Humans , Child , Male , Female , Anesthesia, Intravenous/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Inhalation/adverse effects , Kidney/pathology , Biopsy/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Kidney Diseases/etiology , Kidney Diseases/pathology , Adolescent , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
3.
J Clin Anesth ; 95: 111463, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38593492

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between the delivered gas flows via nasal cannulas and face masks and the set gas flow and the breathing circuit pressure when connecting to the Y-adapter of the anesthesia breathing circuit and using the oxygen blender on the anesthesia machine, relevant to surgery when there is concern for causing a fire. The flow rates that are delivered at various flow rates and circuit pressures have not been previously studied. DESIGN: Laboratory investigation. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: The gas flows from each of 3 anesthesia machines from the same manufacturer were systematically increased from 1 to 15 L/min with changes to the adjustable pressure limiting valve to maintain 0-40 cm water pressure in the breathing circuit for nasal cannula testing and at 20-30 cm water circuit pressure for face masks. MEASUREMENTS: The delivered gas flows to the cannula were determined using a float-ball flowmeter for combinations of set gas flows and circuit pressures after connecting the cannula tubing to the Y-piece of the anesthesia circuit via a tracheal tube adapter. Decreasing the supply tubing length on the delivered flow rates was evaluated. MAIN RESULTS: There was a highly linear relationship between the anesthesia circuit pressure and the delivered nasal cannula flow rates, with 0 flow observed when the APL valve was fully open (i.e., 0 cm water). However, even under maximum conditions (40 cm water and 15 L/min), the delivered nasal cannula flow rate was 3.5 L/min. Shortening the 6.5-ft cannula tubing increased the flow at 20 and 30 cm water by approximately 0.12 L/min/ft. The estimated FiO2 assuming a minute ventilation of 5 L/min and 30% FiO2 ranged from 21.7% to 27.0% at nasal cannula flow rates of 0.5 to 4.0 L/min. When using a face mask and the APL fully closed, delivered flow rates were 0.25 L/min less than the set flow rate between 1 and 3 L/min and equal to the set flow rate between 4 and 8 L/min. CONCLUSIONS: When using a nasal cannula adapted to the Y-piece of the anesthesia circuit, the delivery system is linearly dependent on the pressure in the circuit and uninfluenced by the flow rate set on the anesthesia machine. However, only modest flow rates (≤ 3.5 L/min) and a limited increase in the inspired FiO2 are possible when using this delivery method. When using a face mask and the anesthesia circuit, flow rates close to the set flow rate are possible with the APL valve fully closed. Patients scheduled for sedation for head and neck procedures with increased fire risk who require more than a marginal increase in the FiO2 to maintain an acceptable pulse oximetry saturation may need general anesthesia with tracheal intubation.


Subject(s)
Cannula , Equipment Design , Masks , Humans , Anesthesia, Inhalation/instrumentation , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Closed-Circuit/instrumentation , Anesthesia, Closed-Circuit/methods
4.
J Anesth ; 38(3): 295-300, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551676

ABSTRACT

As the COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of propofol in the intensive care unit for the management of respiratory sequelae and supply had become a major issue. Indeed, most hospitals in Japan were forced to use propofol only for induction of anesthesia with inhalational maintenance. Large amounts of propofol remain in the syringe which exacerbates the problems by increased waste. I propose that use of low dose propofol in combination with a low concentration inhaled anesthetic as an alternative and call this hybrid anesthesia. Several advantages of hybrid anesthesia are evident in the literature. Volatile anesthesia has several disadvantages such as cancer progression, emergence agitation, marked reduction in motor evoked potentials (MEP), laryngospasm with desflurane and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Volatile anesthesia exerts some beneficial actions such as myocardial protection and fast emergence with desflurane. In contrast, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) provides better survival in patients undergoing radical cancer surgery, reduction in emergence agitation, laryngospasm, PONV and better MEP trace Intraoperative awareness occurs more often during TIVA. When intravenous and volatile anesthesia are combined (hybrid anesthesia), the disadvantages of both methods may be offset by clear advantages. Thus, hybrid anesthesia may, therefore, be a viable anesthetic choice.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , COVID-19 , Humans , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Propofol/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Intravenous/methods , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods
5.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(6): 1314-1321, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490897

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To quantify and compare the emissions for deep sedation with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and general anesthesia with inhaled agents during the transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedure. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: A tertiary hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: The anesthesia records of 604 consecutive patients who underwent the transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedure between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2022, were reviewed and analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: Data were examined and compared in the following 2 groups: general anesthesia with inhaled agents and deep sedation with TIVA. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The gases, drugs, airway management devices, and anesthesia machine electricity were collected and converted into carbon dioxide emissions (CO2e). The carbon emissions of intravenous medications were converted with the CO2e data for anesthetic pharmaceuticals from the Parvatker et al. study. For inhaled agents, inhaled anesthetics and oxygen/air flow rate were collected at 15-minute intervals and calculated using the anesthetic gases calculator provided by the Association of Anesthetists. The airway management devices were converted based on life-cycle assessments. The electricity consumed by the anesthesia machine during general anesthesia was estimated from the manufacturer's data (Dräger, GE) and local Energy Information Administration data. The data were analyzed in the chi-squared test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. There were no significant differences in the patients' demographic characteristics, such as age, sex, weight, height, and body mass index. The patients who received general anesthesia with inhaled agents had statistically higher total CO2e per case than deep sedation with TIVA (16.188 v 1.518 kg CO2e; p < 0.001), primarily due to the inhaled agents and secondarily to airway management devices. For deep sedation with TIVA, the major contributors were intravenous medications (71.02%) and airway management devices (16.58%). A subgroup study of patients who received sevoflurane only showed the same trend with less variation. CONCLUSIONS: The patients who received volatile anesthesia were found to have a higher CO2e per case. This difference remained after a subgroup analysis evaluating those patients only receiving sevoflurane and after accounting for the differences in the duration of anesthesia. Data from this study and others should be collectively considered as the healthcare profession aims to provide the best care possible for their patients while limiting the harm caused to the environment.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Inhalation , Anesthesia, Intravenous , Carbon Footprint , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Aged , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia, Intravenous/methods , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage
6.
J Clin Anesth ; 95: 111441, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38452428

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a non-reactive carbon dioxide absorbent (AMSORB® Plus) versus a traditional carbon dioxide absorbent (Medisorb™) on the FGF used by anesthesia providers and an electronic educational feedback intervention using Carestation™ Insights (GE HealthCare) on provider-specific change in FGF. DESIGN: Prospective, single-center cohort study set in a greening initiative. SETTING: Operating room. PARTICIPANTS: 157 anesthesia providers (i.e., anesthesiology trainees, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and solo anesthesiologists). INTERVENTIONS: Intervention #1 was the introduction of AMSORB® Plus into 8 Aisys CS2, Carestation™ Insights-enabled anesthesia machines (GE HealthCare) at the study site. At the end of week 6, anesthesia providers were educated and given an environmentally oriented electronic feedback strategy for the next 12 weeks of the study (Intervention #2) using Carestation™ Insights data. MEASUREMENTS: The dual primary outcomes were the difference in average daily FGF during maintenance anesthesia between machines assigned to AMSORB® Plus versus Medisorb™ and the provider-specific change in average fresh gas flows after 12 weeks of feedback and education compared to the historical data. MAIN RESULTS: Over the 18-week period, there were 1577 inhaled anesthetics performed in the 8 operating rooms (528 for intervention 1, 1049 for intervention 2). There were 1001 provider days using Aisys CS2 machines and 7452 provider days of historical data from the preceding year. Overall, AMSORB® Plus was not associated with significantly less FGF (mean - 80 ml/min, 97.5% confidence interval - 206 to 46, P = .15). The environmentally oriented electronic feedback intervention was not associated with a significant decrease in provider-specific mean FGF (-112 ml/min, 97.5% confidence interval - 244 to 21, P = .059). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that introducing a non-reactive absorbent did not significantly alter FGF. Using environmentally oriented electronic feedback relying on data analytics did not result in significantly reduced provider-specific FGF.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Carbon Dioxide , Operating Rooms , Humans , Prospective Studies , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Feedback , Anesthesiologists , Anesthesiology/instrumentation , Anesthesiology/education , Nurse Anesthetists , Anesthesia, Inhalation/instrumentation , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods , Gas Scavengers , Female
7.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0298264, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38547201

ABSTRACT

Although sevoflurane is one of the most commonly used inhalational anesthetic agents, the popularity of desflurane is increasing to a level similar to that of sevoflurane. Inhalational anesthesia generally activates and represses the expression of genes related to xenobiotic metabolism and immune response, respectively. However, there has been no comprehensive comparison of the effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on the expression of these genes. Thus, we used a next-generation sequencing method to compare alterations in the global gene expression profiles in the livers of rats subjected to inhalational anesthesia by sevoflurane or desflurane. Our bioinformatics analyses revealed that sevoflurane and, to a greater extent, desflurane significantly activated genes related to xenobiotic metabolism. Our analyses also revealed that both anesthetic agents, especially sevoflurane, downregulated many genes related to immune response.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Isoflurane , Methyl Ethers , Animals , Rats , Sevoflurane/pharmacology , Desflurane , Isoflurane/pharmacology , Methyl Ethers/pharmacology , Transcriptome , Xenobiotics , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Anesthesia, Inhalation
8.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 18: 685-697, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38445065

ABSTRACT

Purpose: We designed this study to investigate the effect of intravenous use of penehyclidine on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Patients and Methods: Ninety-two Women Patients (Aged ≥ 18) Scheduled for Elective Gynecologic Laparoscopy Were Enrolled in the Current Study. Patients Were Equally Randomized Assigned Into Penehyclidine group (PHC group: received a bolus of penehyclidine 10 µg/kg during the induction of anesthesia, then followed by a continuous infusion of 10 µg/kg penehyclidine at a fixed rate of 2.0 mL/h in postoperative intravenous analgesia pump over 48h, 0.5 mg upper limit respectively) or Control group (received 0.9% saline in replace of penehyclidine at the same time points). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the postanesthesia care unit and ward area. Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores and general comfort questionnaire (GCQ) scores were assessed on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2. Results: Patients between two groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Compared with the Control group, the incidence and severity of PONV, postoperative nausea (PON), and postoperative vomiting (POV) were significantly lower in the PHC group at 2h (PONV: P = 0.002, P = 0.004, respectively; PON: P = 0.018, P = 0.038, respectively; POV: P = 0.011, P = 0.072, respectively), 24h (PONV: P = 0.003, P = 0.001, respectively; PON: P = 0.010, P = 0.032, respectively; POV: P = 0.006, P = 0.044, respectively), and 48h (PONV: P = 0.003, P = 0.002, respectively; PON: P = 0.007, P = 0.019, respectively; POV: P = 0.002, P = 0.013, respectively) after surgery. The QoR-15 and GCQ scores of the PHC group were significantly higher than those of the Control group at POD 1, 2 (P < 0.001; P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that perioperative intravenous application of penehyclidine can effectively prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecological laparoscopic surgery patients and improve postoperative recovery.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting , Quinuclidines , Female , Humans , Anesthesia, Inhalation , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Quinuclidines/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Double-Blind Method
10.
A A Pract ; 18(2): e01746, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38358111

ABSTRACT

We report a case of acute intraoperative tympanic membrane (TM) rupture in a patient anesthetized with desflurane without N2O. The patient was undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to treat ascending cholangitis. TM rupture is known to occur with N2O but has not been reported in the literature with the use of inhaled volatile anesthetics without N2O. We suspect that several factors contributed to this complication, including prone positioning, a remote history of ear trauma, and the selection of desflurane as the maintenance anesthetic as opposed to a vapor with a higher blood-gas partition coefficient.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Desflurane , Tympanic Membrane Perforation , Humans , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Desflurane/adverse effects , Isoflurane/adverse effects , Nitrous Oxide
11.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 12, 2024 01 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38172695

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The alteration of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) or the utilization of distinct anesthesia strategies has been linked to the prognosis of various cancer types, but the existing evidence is limited and inconclusive, particularly for colorectal cancer (CRC). Our objective was to evaluate the association between PNI change and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with CRC surgery after propofol-based or sevoflurane-based anesthesia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 414 patients with CRC who underwent surgical resection. Among them, 165 patients received propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA-P), while 249 patients received sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia (IA-S). The PNI change (ΔPNI) was calculated by subtracting the pre-surgery PNI from the post-surgery PNI, and patients were categorized into high (≥ -2.25) and low (< -2.25) ΔPNI groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to evaluate the effects of the two anesthesia methods, ΔPNI, and their potential interaction on PFS and OS. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 35.9 months (interquartile range: 18-60 months). The five-year OS rates were 63.0% in the TIVA-P group and 59.8% in the IA-S group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.35; p = 0.864), while the five-year PFS rates were 55.8% and 51.0% (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.68-1.26; p = 0.614), respectively. In comparison to patients in the low ΔPNI group, those in the high ΔPNI group exhibited a favorable association with both OS (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40-0.76; p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.43-0.79; p < 0.001). Stratified analysis based on ΔPNI revealed significant protective effects in the propofol-treated participants within the high ΔPNI group, whereas such effects were not observed in the low ΔPNI group, for both OS (p for interaction = 0.004) and PFS (p for interaction = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that among patients who underwent CRC surgery, those treated with TIVA-P exhibited superior survival outcomes compared to those who received IA-S, particularly among individuals with a high degree of PNI change.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Propofol , Humans , Prognosis , Sevoflurane , Nutrition Assessment , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery
13.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci ; 63(1): 57-66, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38040412

ABSTRACT

Neonatal rodents undergo anesthesia for numerous procedures and for euthanasia by anesthetic overdose. However, data regarding whether neonatal anesthesia is humane are limited. Hypothermia (cryoanesthesia) is the most commonly used anesthetic protocol for neonatal rats 10 d of age or younger. However, hypothermia has recently been restricted in several countries due to perceived painful effects, including pain on rewarming. Minimizing the potential pain and distress of neonates in research is imperative, although very challenging. Traditional validated and nonvalidated behavioral and physiologic outcome measures used for adult rats undergoing anesthesia are unsuitable for evaluating neonates. Therefore, we investigated the effects of several anesthetic methods on neonatal rats by using the innovative objective approaches of noninvasive ultrasonic vocalizations and more invasive neuroendocrine responses (i. e., serum corticosterone, norepinephrine, glucose). Our results show that hypothermia leads to heightened acute distress in neonatal rats as indicated by prolonged recovery times, increased duration of vocalizations, and elevated corticosterone levels, as compared with neonates undergoing inhalational anesthesia. We demonstrate that inhalational anesthesia is preferable to cryoanesthesia for neonatal rats, and researchers using hypothermia anesthesia should consider using inhalational anesthesia as an alternative method.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Hypothermia , Animals , Rats , Hypothermia/chemically induced , Hypothermia/veterinary , Animals, Newborn , Vocalization, Animal , Ultrasonics , Corticosterone , Pain , Anesthesia, Inhalation , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects
14.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 51(1): 80-89, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37926586

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To screen modulators of biogenic amine (BA) neurotransmission for the ability to cause fentanyl to decrease isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) in cats, and to test whether fentanyl plus a combination of modulators decreases isoflurane MAC more than fentanyl alone. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, experimental study. ANIMALS: A total of six adult male Domestic Short Hair cats. METHODS: Each cat was anesthetized in three phases with a 1 week washout between studies. In phase 1, anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane, and MAC was measured in duplicate using a tail clamp stimulus and standard bracketing technique. A 21 ng mL-1 fentanyl target-controlled infusion was then administered and MAC measured again. In phase 2, a single cat was administered a single BA modulator (buspirone, haloperidol, dexmedetomidine, pregabalin, ramelteon or trazodone) in a pilot drug screen, and isoflurane MAC was measured before and after fentanyl administration. In phase 3, isoflurane MAC was measured before and after fentanyl administration in cats co-administered trazodone and dexmedetomidine, the two BA modulator drugs associated with fentanyl MAC-sparing in the screen. Isoflurane MAC-sparing by fentanyl alone, trazodone-dexmedetomidine and trazodone-dexmedetomidine-fentanyl was evaluated using paired t tests with p < 0.05 denoting significant effects. RESULTS: The MAC of isoflurane was 1.87% ± 0.09 and was not significantly affected by fentanyl administration (p = 0.09). In the BA screen, cats administered trazodone or dexmedetomidine exhibited 26% and 22% fentanyl MAC-sparing, respectively. Trazodone-dexmedetomidine co-administration decreased isoflurane MAC to 1.50% ± 0.14 (p < 0.001), and the addition of fentanyl further decreased MAC to 0.95% ± 0.16 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fentanyl alone does not affect isoflurane MAC in cats, but co-administration of trazodone and dexmedetomidine causes fentanyl to significantly decrease isoflurane requirement.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Dexmedetomidine , Isoflurane , Trazodone , Cats , Male , Animals , Isoflurane/pharmacology , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Trazodone/pharmacology , Prospective Studies , Anesthesia, Inhalation/veterinary , Pulmonary Alveoli
15.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 43(1): 101318, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37918790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Emergence delirium (ED) is a postoperative complication in pediatric anesthesia characterized by a perception and psychomotor disorder, with a negative impact on postoperative recovery. As the use of inhalation anesthesia is associated with a higher incidence of ED, we investigated whether titrating the depth of general anesthesia with BIS monitor can reduce the incidence of ED. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, and double-blind. SETTING: Patients undergoing endoscopic adenoidectomy under general anesthesia according to a uniform protocol. PATIENTS: A total of 163 patients of both sexes aged 3-8 years were enrolled over 18 months. INTERVENTIONS: Immediately after the induction of general anesthesia, a bispectral index (BIS) electrode was placed on the patient's forehead. In the study group, the depth of general anesthesia was monitored with the aim of achieving BIS values of 40-60. In the control group, the dose of sevoflurane was determined by the anaesthesiologist based on MAC (minimum alveolar concentration) and the end-tidal concentration. MEASUREMENTS: The primary objective was to compare the occurrence of ED during the PACU (post-anesthesia care unit) stay in both arms of the study. The secondary objective was to determine the PAED score at 10 and 30 min in the PACU and the need for rescue treatment of ED. MAIN RESULTS: 86 children were randomized in the intervention group and 77 children in the control group. During the entire PACU stay, 23.3% (38/163) of patients developed ED with PAED score >10: 35.1% (27/77) in the control group and 12.8% (11/86) in the intervention group (p = 0.001). Lower PAED scores were also found in the intervention group at 10 (p < 0.001) and 30 (p < 0.001) minutes compared to the control group. The need for rescue treatment did not differ between groups (p = 0.067). CONCLUSION: Individualization of the depth of general anesthesia with BIS monitoring is an effective method of preventing ED in children. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04466579.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Anesthesia, Inhalation , Emergence Delirium , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Inhalation/adverse effects , Emergence Delirium/epidemiology , Emergence Delirium/prevention & control , Emergence Delirium/etiology , Prospective Studies , Sevoflurane , Child, Preschool
16.
Med Gas Res ; 14(1): 26-32, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37721252

ABSTRACT

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a unique anesthetic agent that has both advantages and disadvantages, especially in neurosurgical patients. Various studies evaluating the use of N2O in different surgical populations have been inconclusive so far. In this prospective, single-blinded, randomized study, 50 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, were enrolled and randomly allocated into N2O or N2O free group. Data including demographics, intraoperative vitals, blood gases, intravenous fluids, anesthetic drug consumption, brain condition, emergence and recovery time, duration of surgery and anesthesia, duration of postoperative ventilation, perioperative complications, condition at discharge, and duration of intensive care unit & hospital stay were recorded. There was no significant difference in intensive care unit or hospital stay between the groups. However, a significant difference in intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure was observed. The incidence of intraoperative tachycardia and hypotension was significantly higher in the N2O free group. Other intra- and post-operative parameters, perioperative complications, and conditions at discharge were comparable. Use of N2O anesthesia for cerebellopontine tumor surgery in good physical grade and well-optimized patients neither increases the length of intensive care unit or hospital stay nor does it affect the complications and conditions at discharge. However, future studies in poor-grade patients with large tumors and raised intracranial pressure will be required to draw a definitive conclusion.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Methyl Ethers , Neoplasms , Humans , Nitrous Oxide , Sevoflurane , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Methyl Ethers/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Inhalation
17.
J Clin Anesth ; 92: 111306, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37883902

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the risk of brain swelling during craniotomy between propofol-based and volatile-based anesthesia. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: Operating room. INTERVENTION: Propofol-based anesthesia. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing craniotomy. MEASUREMENTS: Databases, including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, were searched from inception to April 2023. The primary outcome was the risk of brain swelling, while the secondary outcomes included the impact of anesthetic regimens on surgical and recovery outcomes, as well as the risk of hemodynamic instability. MAIN RESULTS: Our meta-analysis of 17 RCTs showed a significantly lower risk of brain swelling (risk ratio [RR]: 0.85, p = 0.03, I2 = 21%, n = 1976) in patients receiving propofol than in those using volatile agents, without significant differences in surgical time or blood loss between the two groups. Moreover, propofol was associated with a lower intracranial pressure (ICP) (mean difference: -4.06 mmHg, p < 0.00001, I2 = 44%, n = 409) as well as a lower risk of tachycardia (RR = 0.54, p = 0.005, I2 = 0%, n = 822) and postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV) (RR = 0.59, p = 0.002, I2 = 19%, n = 1382). There were no significant differences in other recovery outcomes (e.g., extubation time), risk of bradycardia, hypertension, or hypotension between the two groups. Subgroup analysis indicated that propofol was not associated with a reduced risk of brain swelling when compared to individual volatile agents. Stratified by craniotomy indications, propofol reduced brain swelling in elective craniotomy, but not in emergency craniotomy (e.g., traumatic brain injury), when compared to volatile anesthetics. CONCLUSIONS: By reviewing the available evidence, our results demonstrate the beneficial effects of propofol on the risk of brain swelling, ICP, PONV, and intraoperative tachycardia. In emergency craniotomy for traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage, brain swelling showed no significant difference between propofol and volatile agents. Further large-scale studies are warranted for verification.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Brain Edema , Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Propofol , Adult , Humans , Anesthesia, Inhalation , Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Brain Edema/epidemiology , Brain Edema/etiology , Brain Edema/prevention & control , Craniotomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/epidemiology , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/etiology , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Propofol/adverse effects , Tachycardia , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
18.
J Equine Vet Sci ; 132: 104986, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38135197

ABSTRACT

Effects of general anesthesia with controlled ventilation on the respiratory system have had limited evaluation in horses. A prospective observational study was performed with eleven client-owned horses undergoing elective surgery. Physical examination, auscultation with a rebreathing bag, complete blood cell count, lung ultrasound imaging, tracheal endoscopy imaging and transendoscopic tracheal wash were conducted before and 24 hours after anesthesia. Lung ultrasound imaging was also repeated just after recovery. A significant increase in blood neutrophil count between pre- and post-anesthesia (P=0.004) was observed. There was an increase in ultrasonographic score of the lungs at recovery (left P=0.007, right P=0.017). The score of the dependent lung was higher than the independent lung at recovery time (P=0.026) but no difference was observed 24 hours after anesthesia. The tracheal mucus score was higher after anesthesia (P=0.001); severe local inflammation was present in several horses at the site of endotracheal tube cuff. Neutrophil count was significantly higher on tracheal wash fluid cytology after anesthesia (P=0.016), without any significant changes on bacterial load. Increased tracheal mucus score and neutrophil count in tracheal wash samples were observed after general anesthesia in healthy horses without clinical evidence of pneumonia (fever, cough). Tracheal inflammation secondary to endotracheal intubation and cuff inflation was, therefore, suspected. Elective surgery without complications can induce inflammation of the trachea and changes in ultrasound images of the lungs in healthy horses and should be considered when evaluating respiratory system after a general anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy , Horse Diseases , Humans , Horses , Animals , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Endoscopy/veterinary , Trachea/diagnostic imaging , Trachea/microbiology , Inflammation/diagnosis , Inflammation/veterinary , Neutrophils , Anesthesia, Inhalation/veterinary , Horse Diseases/diagnosis
19.
Rev. int. med. cienc. act. fis. deporte ; 23(93): 101-116, nov.- dec. 2023. tab, ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-229999

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the effects of combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia on postoperative immune and cognitive function in cirrhotic patients, particularly those with a background in athletics and fitness. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest, and Chinese biomedical literature databases (Wanfang, Weipu, CNKI) for controlled trials assessing combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia in cirrhotic patients, with an emphasis on those maintaining an athletic or fitness-oriented lifestyle. The literature was analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software, focusing on exploring the heterogeneity of the studies. Results: Nine research papers were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 775 subjects, including 382 in the control group and 393 in the experimental group. Among these, a significant portion of the subjects were identified as being involved in regular athletic or fitness activities. Eight papers were prospective studies, and one was retrospective. The meta[1]analysis revealed that combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia significantly increased CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ levels, and improved the CD4+/CD8+ ratio, demonstrating enhanced immune function. Additionally, cognitive function improvements were noted [OR: 1.45, 95% CI (1.03, 1.87), P<0.00001]. There were also significant improvements in liver function markers ALT and ALB. Funnel plots indicated no publication bias (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/surgery , Athletes , Anesthesia, Intravenous , Anesthesia, Inhalation , Cognition , Postoperative Period
20.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37956664

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: During inhalation anesthesia with nitrous oxide in oxygen the pressure in the cuff of the endotracheal tube may increase due to diffusion of nitrous oxide into the cuff. The aim of the study was to investigate the development of cuff pressure during nitrous oxide anesthesia under clinical conditions in feline patients and to identify possible influencing factors such as tube size and gas flow rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The prospective study included cats scheduled for inhalation anesthesia with nitrous oxide for a minimum duration of 60 minutes at the Department for Small Animals of the University of Leipzig. Cuff pressure was adjusted with a cuff manometer and its development was recorded. RESULTS: In total, the cuff pressure values of 24 cats were recorded. Animals were allocated into groups by tube size (ID 4.0 mm and ID 4.5 mm) and by fresh gas flow rate: low flow rate (0.6 l/min) and high flow rate (3 l/min). During anesthesia, cuff pressure increased over time, with statistical significance occurring from 45 minutes onwards in comparison to the initial cuff pressure (p=0.005). After 60 minutes, there was a mean cuff pressure increase of 3 cmH2O. Despite this moderate mean increase, highly variable pressure values up to 48 cmH2O in individual animals were recorded. No cat reached the termination criterion of 60 cmH2O cuff pressure. Effects of tube size (p=0.63) and flow rate (p=0.334) on the cuff pressure were not evident. CONCLUSION: After a period of 45 minutes of nitrous oxide administration, a significant increase in cuff pressure occurs in the cat. However, tube size and total gas flow rate do not seem to influence the cuff pressure development. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When using nitrous oxide during inhalation anesthesia, regular cuff pressure evaluation and correction are necessary and hence recommended in feline patients. As individual pressure changes may be highly variable, no fixed recommendations for optimal management are possible.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Inhalation , Nitrous Oxide , Humans , Cats , Animals , Prospective Studies , Anesthesia, Inhalation/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Inhalation/veterinary , Intubation, Intratracheal/veterinary , Pressure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...