Health-related qualify of life, angina type and coronary artery disease in patients with stable chest pain.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is impaired in patients with stable angina but patients often present with other forms of chest pain. The aim of this study was to compare the pre-diagnostic HRQoL in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) according to angina type, gender, and presence of obstructive CAD. METHODS: From the pilot study for the European DISCHARGE trial, we analysed data from 24 sites including 1263 patients (45.9% women, 61.1 ± 11.3 years) who were clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA; 617 patients) or coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA; 646 patients). Prior to the procedures, patients completed HRQoL questionnaires: the Short Form (SF)-12v2, the EuroQoL (EQ-5D-3 L) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of ICA and 35% of CTA patients had typical angina, 23 and 33% had atypical angina, 18 and 28% had non-anginal chest discomfort and 5 and 5% had other chest discomfort, respectively. Patients with typical angina had the poorest physical functioning compared to the other angina groups (SF-12 physical component score; 41.2 ± 8.8, 43.3 ± 9.1, 46.2 ± 9.0, 46.4 ± 11.4, respectively, all age and gender-adjusted p < 0.01), and highest anxiety levels (8.3 ± 4.1, 7.5 ± 4.1, 6.5 ± 4.0, 4.7 ± 4.5, respectively, all adjusted p < 0.01). On all other measures, patients with typical or atypical angina had lower HRQoL compared to the two other groups (all adjusted p < 0.05). HRQoL did not differ between patients with and without obstructive CAD while women had worse HRQoL compared with men, irrespective of age and angina type. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to a diagnostic procedure for stable chest pain, HRQoL is associated with chest pain characteristics, but not with obstructive CAD, and is significantly lower in women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02400229.

The importance of characteristics of angina symptoms for the prediction of coronary artery disease in a cohort of stable patients in the modern era.

OBJECTIVE: Angina is an important clinical symptom indicating underlying coronary artery disease (CAD). Its characteristics are important for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with CAD. Currently, we aimed to investigate the association of chest pain characteristics with the presence of obstructive CAD in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected stable CAD. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected stable CAD (n = 686) in a single university hospital cardiology department were enrolled. Chest pain was classified as typical angina, atypical angina, nonangina chest pain, and lack of symptoms. The presence of significant angiographic CAD was diagnosed by standard coronary angiography. RESULTS: Typical angina symptoms were associated with a higher prevalence of CAD (odds ratio [OR], 3.47, p < 0.001), whereas atypical angina symptoms were associated with a lower prevalence of CAD (OR, 0.49, p = 0.003) than the nonangina symptoms/or asymptomatic status. In multivariate analysis, typical angina symptoms remained an independent predictor of CAD (OR, 2.54, p < 0.001), with a greater predictive accuracy than other clinical risk factors (area under the curve [AUC], 0.715, p < 0.001) and similar to the accuracy of the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (AUC, 0.712, p < 0.001). In a multivariate model, the combination of all studied factors further improved the predictive accuracy (AUC, 0.81, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a contemporary cohort of patients referred for coronary angiography for stable CAD, the presence of typical angina symptoms was the most important independent predictor of obstructive CAD. The association of atypical angina symptoms with low CAD prevalence compared to nonangina chest pain or absence of significant symptoms probably reflects different management and referral strategies in these groups of patients.

Cardiopatía isquémica crónica en el anciano / Chronic ischaemic heart disease in the elderly

Este artículo pretende tener en cuenta las peculiaridades y características específicas de los pacientes ancianos con cardiopatía isquémica crónica desde una perspectiva multidisciplinar, con la participación de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (secciones de Cardiología Geriátrica y Cardiopatía Isquémica/Cuidados Agudos Cardiovasculares), la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna, la Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria y la Sociedad Española de Geriatría y Gerontología. En este documento de consenso se detalla cómo el abordaje de estos enfermos de edad avanzada exige una valoración integral de la comorbilidad, la fragilidad, el estado funcional, la polifarmacia y las interacciones medicamentosas. Concluimos que en la mayoría de los pacientes el tratamiento médico es la mejor opción y que, a la hora de programarlo, se deben tener en cuenta los factores anteriores y las alteraciones biológicas asociadas al envejecimiento (AU)

It is the aim of this manuscript to take into account the peculiarities and specific characteristics of elderly patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease from a multidisciplinary perspective, with the participation of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (sections of Geriatric Cardiology and Ischaemic Heart Disease/Acute Cardiovascular Care), the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine, the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians and the Spanish Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology. This consensus document shows that in order to adequately address these elderly patients a comprehensive assessment is needed, which includes comorbidity, frailty, functional status, polypharmacy and drug interactions. We conclude that in most patients medical treatment is the best option and that this treatment must take into account the above factors and the biological changes associated with aging (AU)

Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

IMPORTANCE: Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization were developed to critically evaluate and improve patient selection for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). National trends in the appropriateness of PCI have not been examined. OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in PCI utilization, patient selection, and procedural appropriateness following the introduction of Appropriate Use Criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, longitudinal, cross-sectional analysis of patients undergoing PCI between July 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014, at hospitals continuously participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry over the study period. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportion of nonacute PCIs classified as inappropriate at the patient and hospital level using the 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 2.7 million PCI procedures from 766 hospitals were included. Annual PCI volume of acute indications was consistent over the study period (377,540 in 2010; 374,543 in 2014), but the volume of nonacute PCIs decreased from 89,704 in 2010 to 59,375 in 2014. Among patients undergoing nonacute PCI, there were significant increases in angina severity (Canadian Cardiovascular Society grade III/IV angina, 15.8% in 2010 and 38.4% in 2014), use of antianginal medications prior to PCI (at least 2 antianginal medications, 22.3% in 2010 and 35.1% in 2014), and high-risk findings on noninvasive testing (22.2% in 2010 and 33.2% in 2014) (P < .001 for all), but only modest increases in multivessel coronary artery disease (43.7% in 2010 and 47.5% in 2014, P < .001). The proportion of nonacute PCIs classified as inappropriate decreased from 26.2% (95% CI, 25.8%-26.6%) to 13.3% (95% CI, 13.1%-13.6%), and the absolute number of inappropriate PCIs decreased from 21,781 to 7921. Hospital-level variation in the proportion of PCIs classified as inappropriate persisted over the study period (median, 12.6% [interquartile range, 5.9%-22.9%] in 2014). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Since the publication of the Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in 2009, there have been significant reductions in the volume of nonacute PCI. The proportion of nonacute PCIs classified as inappropriate has declined, although hospital-level variation in inappropriate PCI persists.

Limitations of Chest Pain Categorization Models to Predict Coronary Artery Disease.

We aimed to evaluate how chest pain categorization, currently used to assess the pretest probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), predicts the actual presence of CAD in a population of patients with stable symptoms. We studied 475 consecutive patients enrolled in the Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischemic Heart Disease study based on possible symptoms of CAD. Chest pain or discomfort was categorized as typical angina, atypical angina, or as nonanginal according to the guidelines. Exertional dyspnea and fatigue suspected to be angina equivalents were classified as atypical angina. Patients with a probability of CAD <20 or >90% based on age, gender, and symptoms were excluded. The end points of this substudy were significant CAD (defined by invasive coronary angiography as >50% reduction in lumen diameter in the left main stem or >70% stenosis in a major coronary vessel or 30% to 70% stenosis with fractional flow reserve ≤0.8), inducible myocardial ischemia at noninvasive stress imaging, and their association. Patients' symptoms had limited ability to predict the presence of significant CAD, global chi-square being 5.0. The inclusion of age increased global chi-square to 18.7 and gender increased it further to 51.1. Using inducible myocardial ischemia or the association of CAD with inducible ischemia as end points, the ability to predict these end points was again better for patient demographics than for patient symptoms. Thus, the ability of current models based on symptoms, age, and gender to predict the presence of CAD is mainly based on patient demographics as opposed to symptoms.

Efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus in refractory angina.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with coronary artery disease who are not candidates for revascularization have refractory angina despite standard medical therapy. The balloon-expandable, stainless steel, hourglass-shaped, coronary-sinus reducing device creates a focal narrowing and increases pressure in the coronary sinus, thus redistributing blood into ischemic myocardium. METHODS: We randomly assigned 104 patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III or IV angina (on a scale from I to IV, with higher classes indicating greater limitations on physical activity owing to angina) and myocardial ischemia, who were not candidates for revascularization, to implantation of the device (treatment group) or to a sham procedure (control group). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with an improvement of at least two CCS angina classes at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 35% of the patients in the treatment group (18 of 52 patients), as compared with 15% of those in the control group (8 of 52), had an improvement of at least two CCS angina classes at 6 months (P=0.02). The device was also associated with improvement of at least one CCS angina class in 71% of the patients in the treatment group (37 of 52 patients), as compared with 42% of those in the control group (22 of 52) (P=0.003). Quality of life as assessed with the use of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire was significantly improved in the treatment group, as compared with the control group (improvement on a 100-point scale, 17.6 vs. 7.6 points; P=0.03). There were no significant between-group differences in improvement in exercise time or in the mean change in the wall-motion index as assessed by means of dobutamine echocardiography. At 6 months, 1 patient in the treatment group had had a myocardial infarction; in the control group, 1 patient had died and 3 had had a myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: In this small clinical trial, implantation of the coronary-sinus reducing device was associated with significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina who were not candidates for revascularization. (Funded by Neovasc; COSIRA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01205893.).

[The research of establishing discriminant function for patients with angina pectoris by stepwise analysis based on serum inflammatory factors].

OBJECTIVE: To improve cost-efficiency, discriminant functions in stepwise method was founded for the differential diagnosis of angina pectoris by detecting the serum level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) in patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP). METHODS: Thirty-nine SAP patients and 47 UAP patients were enrolled into the study, while 39 healthy volunteers were enrolled into the controlled group forming the entire set of training samples. The serum levels of hs-CRP, MIF, IL-4 and IL-10 were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data was analyzed by software to define discriminant functions in the ways of "entering" and "stepwise". Both functions were evaluated by the results of validation. RESULTS: By the way of "enter independent together", the following discriminant functions were defined based on the data of training samples' age, hs-CRP, MIF, IL-4, IL-10: healthy control group =-129.858 + 2.869×age -2.451×hs-CRP + 1.393×MIF + 6.001×IL-4 + 4.848×IL-10; SAP group=-161.037 + 2.896×age-2.022×hs-CRP + 1.662×MIF + 6.703×IL-4 + 6.287×IL-10; UAP group=-199.087 + 2.468×age-1.440×hs-CRP + 3.404×MIF-13.875×IL-4 + 7.752×IL-10. Retrospective validation showed 4.8% of total miss-grouping, while cross-validation showed 5.6% of total miss-grouping. By the way of "stepwise", the above data was screened by software and training samples' age, MIF and IL-10 were suggested to define the following functions: healthy control group = - 125.218 + 2.659 × age + 0.599×MIF + 5.040 × IL-10; SAP group=-157.864 + 2.721×age + 1.008×MIF + 6.468×IL-10; UAP group=- 197.327 + 2.360×age + 2.932×MIF + 7.640×IL-10. Both retrospective and cross validation showed 6.4% of total miss-grouping. Both sets of discriminant functions had the same efficiency (100%) for differential diagnosis of SAP and UAP. CONCLUSION: The discriminant functions based on samples' age, MIF and IL-10, which were screened and suggested by stepwise method, may contribute to the differential diagnosis of atypical SAP and UAP, and therefore demonstrate better cost-efficiency.

Prognostic value of the Rose questionnaire: a validation with future coronary events in the SMART study.

AIM: The Rose questionnaire was developed in epidemiological studies to obtain a reproducible diagnosis of angina pectoris. We studied the prognostic value of this questionnaire with respect to the occurrence of future coronary events. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 7916 consecutive patients (mean age 56 years; 67% men) with clinically manifest vascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors, enrolled in the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) study from 1996 to 2009. At inclusion, all patients completed the Rose questionnaire. We investigated the prognostic value of four definitions of angina pectoris that were based on the following elements of the questionnaire (1) the full questionnaire; (2) three key questions concerning chest pain; (3) one question about discomfort or pain in the chest; (4) two questions about complaints when slowing down or stopping activities (the definition that is used in the SMART study). All patients were followed for new coronary events and interventions for an average of 4.6 years. Analyses were with multivariable Cox regression models. Discriminatory ability of the four definitions as assessed with areas under the receiver-operator characteristics curves was similar (range 0.708-0.726) for coronary events in isolation as well as in combination with coronary interventions. The models were assessed for their ability to improve risk stratification compared with each other; differences between definitions are small. CONCLUSION: Our data implicate that the use of a subset of questions of the Rose questionnaire performs equally well compared with the full Rose questionnaire regarding the prediction of coronary events.

Patients' descriptions of angina symptoms: a qualitative study of primary care patients.

BACKGROUND: Initial diagnosis of angina in primary care is based on the history of symptoms as described by the patient in consultation with their GP. Deciphering and categorising often complex symptom narratives, therefore, represents an ongoing challenge in the early diagnosis of angina in primary care. AIM: To explore how patients with a preexisting angina diagnosis describe their symptoms. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 64 males and females, identified from general practice records as having received a diagnosis of angina within the previous 5 years. RESULTS: While some patients described their angina symptoms in narratives consistent with typical anginal symptoms, others offered more complex descriptions of their angina experiences, which were less easy to classify. The latter was particularly the case for severe coronary artery disease, where some patients tended to downplay chest pain or attribute their experience to other causes. CONCLUSION: Patients with a known diagnosis of angina do not always describe their symptoms in a way that is consistent with Diamond and Forrester's diagnostic framework for typicality of angina. Early diagnosis of angina in primary care requires that GPs operate with a broad level of awareness of the various ways in which their patients describe their symptoms.

Clinical role of estimation metabolic syndrome's components in type 2 diabetic population with symptomatic coronary artery disease--a comparison of two criteria.

Objective of our study was to estimate the metabolic syndrome (MSy)' components in type 2 diabetic subjects (T2D) with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD): arterial hypertension, waist circumference, triglyceridemia and plasma level of HDL, in order to define their clinical role in angina severity status. Second objective was to compare Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria in testing of association MSy with current coronary status of population. Three hundred and twenty seven pts with T2D and manifested CAD were randomly included in a survey. Angina severity was assessed with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS). Data relieved MSyand its components, defined by ATP III, with predictive role for advanced angina stages. Presence of MSy is predictive for CCS3 angina severity (OR 9,93, 95% CI 0,78-126,28). Increased waist is a predictor for CCS3 (OR 1,22, 95% CI 0,27-5,46) and CCS4 symptoms onset (OR 1,55, 95% CI 0,36-6,73). CCS4 severity symptom is independently associated with arterial hypertension (OR 3,72, 95% CI 1,03-13,40) and hypertriglyceridemia (OR 1,72, 95% CI 0,42- 7,00). MSy components: increased waist, arterial hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia have been found predictive for angina CCS4 stage in T2D subjects, when IDF criteria were used. These findings raise the question of importance of metabolic syndrome and its individual constellations in T2D subjects with CAD. Results indicate that both criteria ATP III and IDF are reliable to define MSy in predictive model for coronary clinical status in T2D population.

Mapping of the EQ-5D index from clinical outcome measures and demographic variables in patients with coronary heart disease.

BACKGROUND: The EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D) is a questionnaire that provides a measure of utility for cost-effectiveness analysis. The EQ-5D has been widely used in many patient groups, including those with coronary heart disease. Studies often require patients to complete many questionnaires and the EQ-5D may not be gathered. This study aimed to assess whether demographic and clinical outcome variables, including scores from a disease specific measure, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), could be used to predict, or map, the EQ-5D index value where it is not available. METHODS: Patient-level data from 5 studies of cardiac interventions were used. The data were split into two groups - approximately 60% of the data were used as an estimation dataset for building models, and 40% were used as a validation dataset. Forward ordinary least squares linear regression methods and measures of prediction error were used to build a model to map to the EQ-5D index. Age, sex, a proxy measure of disease stage, Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina severity class, treadmill exercise time (ETT) and scales of the SAQ were examined. RESULTS: The exertional capacity (ECS), disease perception (DPS) and anginal frequency scales (AFS) of the SAQ were the strongest predictors of the EQ-5D index and gave the smallest root mean square errors. A final model was chosen with age, gender, disease stage and the ECS, DPS and AFS scales of the SAQ. ETT and CCS did not improve prediction in the presence of the SAQ scales. Bland-Altman agreement between predicted and observed EQ-5D index values was reasonable for values greater than 0.4, but below this level predicted values were higher than observed. The 95% limits of agreement were wide (-0.34, 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Mapping of the EQ-5D index in cardiac patients from demographics and commonly measured cardiac outcome variables is possible; however, prediction for values of the EQ-5D index below 0.4 was not accurate. The newly designed 5-level version of the EQ-5D with its increased ability to discriminate health states may improve prediction of EQ-5D index values.

Management of stable coronary artery disease.

Results of two randomised controlled trials for the management of mild-to-moderate chronic stable coronary artery disease (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive drug Evaluation [COURAGE] and Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation type-2 Diabetes [BARI-2D]) have stimulated a vigorous debate about whether an initial strategy of revascularisation or a conservative approach with drugs is most effective. The conclusions of these two trials were clear: for some patients randomly assigned after angiography to revascularisation or pharmacological therapy, rates of death and myocardial infarction did not differ between the two strategies. What remains unresolved is how to generalise these data to patients without angiography, the role of stress testing, and the preferred approach to patients with relevant ischaemia on stress testing. This Review draws attention to the controversial issues in both management approaches, analyses the strengths and limitations of recent trials, and proposes a treatment algorithm that is applicable to daily clinical practice. Findings suggest that the severity of anginal symptoms and the extent of ischaemia in stress testing could help to identify patients who are at increased risk and who might benefit from an early invasive strategy. On the basis of the data and considerations presented, a strategy of initial optimum pharmacological therapy or direct invasive management can be tailored to an individual's circumstances and preferences.

Grading chronic angina pectoris (myocardial ischemia).

Once it is determined that the patient's symptoms are thought to be due to chronic stable myocardial ischemia, the symptoms are then graded as 1 to 4 using the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification (CCVS). Class 1-angina with strenuous exertion, Class ll-angina with moderate exertion, Class lll-angina with mild exertion, Class lV-angina with any level of physical exertion. Copyright (c) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Percutaneous intervention: indications, limitations and results except acute coronary syndrome in 2009]. / Angioplastie coronaire: indications, limites et résultats en dehors des syndromes coronaires aigus en 2009.

Most of percutaneous coronary interventions are performed on stabilized patients. Although these procedures have recently been challenged for this type of patient following the publication of the recent Courage study in 2007 (which in fact has only confirmed previous studies), their efficacy is now well established for lowering the frequency of episodes of angina and increasing the performance under load in stabilized high risk patients. In practice, the evaluation of patients (case by case) is essential to establish their risk (low, intermediate or high) in order to offer the most suitable treatment. The aim of this paper is to overview the indications, limitations and results of coronary angioplasties performed in stabilized patients in France in 2009.

Relationship between the EQ-5D index and measures of clinical outcomes in selected studies of cardiovascular interventions.

BACKGROUND: The EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D) has been widely used in studies of cardiac disease, but its measurement properties in this group are not well established. The study aimed to quantify the relationship between measures commonly used in studies of cardiac disease and the EQ-5D index across different levels of disease severity. METHODS: Patient-level data from 7 studies of cardiac interventions were used, which included randomised trials and observational studies. Relationships between the EQ-5D index and commonly used cardiac measures, Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina severity class, treadmill exercise time (ETT) and scales of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) were examined. Mixed effects linear regression was used to assess these relationships, with the EQ-5D index as the response. RESULTS: Study sample sizes ranged from 68 to 2419. Mean baseline EQ-5D index ranged from 0.77 in patients at diagnosis (95% CI 0.75, 0.78) to 0.43 in patients with advanced disease (95% CI 0.39, 0.48) and differed significantly across studies (p < 0.001). There was evidence of a ceiling effect in patients at diagnosis. The minimum clinically important difference of a one minute increase in ETT was associated with a 0.019 (95% CI 0.014, 0.025) increase in EQ-5D index. One class increase in CCS was associated with a 0.11 (95% CI 0.09, 0.13) decrease in EQ-5D index. A 10 unit increase in SAQ scales was associated with increases between 0.04 and 0.07 in EQ-5D index (95% CIs 0.03, 0.05 and 0.05, 0.08). Tests of heterogeneity indicated the EQ-5D-covariate relationships were consistent across levels of disease severity for ETT and the treatment satisfaction scale of the SAQ, but heterogeneous for age, gender, CCS angina class and other scales of the SAQ. CONCLUSION: The EQ-5D index varies with coronary disease severity. The relationship between the EQ-5D index and an outcome measure used in cardiac intervention studies, ETT, was consistent across disease severity levels, but the relationship between demographic variables, CCS angina class and most of the SAQ scales and the EQ-5D index was heterogeneous for patients with different levels of coronary disease. Differences in the EQ-5D index associated with clinically important differences in cardiac measures can be quantified and vary between three important examples - angina class, ETT and SAQ.

Assessment of activity status and survival according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina classification.

BACKGROUND: Despite its widespread use, limited data on the validity of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina (CCSA) classification relative to other measures of functional status have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of the CCSA classification by comparing it with the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and evaluate its prognostic significance with respect to long-term mortality. METHODS: The study population consisted of 1407 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization between 1992 and 1996. The median follow-up period was 9.7 years (interquartile range 6.1 to 11.1 years) and the mortality status as of December 31, 2004 was available for all patients. RESULTS: The first three CCSA classes were inversely related to the DASI. The mean (+/- SD) scores were as follows: class I, 31.4+/-16.7; class II, 22.5+/-15.4; class III, 14.7+/-14.3; and class IV, 15.5+/-14.9 (P<0.01). Increasing CCSA class was associated with increased long-term mortality, even after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Chest pain course was also an important modulator of mortality among class III and IV patients; one-year mortality rates were 8.1% among unstable patients compared with 4.8% among patients with stable or progressing course. CONCLUSION: CCSA classes I to III were inversely related to DASI scores and linearly associated with mortality. The similarity in outcomes among class III and IV patients is probably explained by the confounding effect of the stability of the patients' symptoms. The higher mortality risk among class III and IV patients with an unstable course provides impetus for a revised CCSA definition incorporating this information.

Myocardial bridging in absence of coronary artery disease: proposal of a new classification based on clinical-angiographic data and long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There is no widely accepted classification to guide therapy in patients with symptomatic myocardial bridging (MB). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 157 patients with chest pain, angiographic MB of the left anterior descending artery without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was performed. Patients were evaluated for clinical symptoms, objective signs of ischemia by stress test, intracoronary Doppler flow measurement and coronary flow reserve. 100 patients without CAD or MB served as controls. RESULTS: There was no difference in clinical symptoms and objective signs of ischemia between controls and patients with MB. The length of MB was 22.6 +/- 7.8 mm, maximal systolic luminal diameter reduction 71 +/- 16%, and maximal mid-diastolic luminal reduction 34.7 +/- 13% as demonstrated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Intracoronary Doppler showed significantly increased average peak flow velocity (APV), average systolic peak velocity (ASPV), average diastolic peak flow velocity (ADPV), and maximal peak velocity (MPV) in MB versus proximal and distal segments at rest and after maximal vasodilatation (p < 0.001 for all parameters). Coronary flow reserve was significantly higher proximally (2.9 +/- 0.9) compared with segments distal to the MB (2.0 +/- 0.6, p < 0.01). We propose a new MB classification for symptomatic patients with MB:Type A:incidental finding on angiography, no objective signs of ischemia; Type B: objective signs of ischemia, and Type C: with or without objective signs of ischemia and altered intracoronary hemodynamics (by QCA/CFR/intracoronary Doppler). 5-Year follow-up data based on this classification showed that types B and C responded well to beta-blockers or calcium channel antagonists. Patients with type C refractory to medical therapy were treated with stenting of the MB. CONCLUSION: Patients with MB without CAD did not have a higher prevalence of chest pain or abnormal non-invasive stress tests compared to patients without CAD or MB. Intracoronary hemodynamic measurement is a novel approach that may be valuable in defining the functional significance of MB. We propose a classification of symptomatic patients with MB without CAD using non-invasive and invasive parameters to guide therapeutic choices.