Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0264262, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35180270

ABSTRACT

Whereas much research has been conducted on rats in their roles as pests and laboratory animal models, little is known about rats in their role as companion animals. However, rats have become the third most common companion animal admitted to the British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (BC SPCA) shelter system after cats and dogs. This paper analyses 5 years of province-wide rat admission and outcome data (n = 3,392) at the BC SPCA. Most rats that entered BC SPCA shelters were white, sexually intact, and pups less than 6 months old. Rats were mostly relinquished by their owners, and the most common surrender reasons were due to owner-related issues and housing issues. Reasons for euthanasia were primarily poor health and neonatal age. A multiple linear regression model found that rats that were either senior, albino, unhealthy, seized by humane officers, or born onsite tended to stay longer in shelters (F[12, 1466] = 9.565, p < .001, adjusted R2 = .06). Time to adoption for albino rats was 79% longer than for white rats. These findings help us understand the preferences of rat adopters and why the rat-human relationship may fail. Results may also be useful to improve the quality of life for pet rats by identifying programs to reduce their length of stay in animal shelters. Finally, our study highlights new questions for welfare research in an understudied companion animal-the pet rat.


Subject(s)
Animal Rights/statistics & numerical data , Ownership/statistics & numerical data , Pets , Rats , Animal Rights/standards , Animals , Attitude , British Columbia , Housing, Animal/standards , Housing, Animal/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Models, Statistical
2.
PLoS One ; 15(4): e0230609, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32240198

ABSTRACT

Health, the environment, and animal rights represent the three main reasons people cite for vegetarian diet in Western societies. However, it has not been shown that these motives can be distinguished empirically, and little is known about what kind of people are likely to be compelled by these different motives. This study had three goals. First, we aimed to use construct validation to test whether develop health, environmental, and animal rights motives for a vegetarian diet could be distinguished. Second, we evaluated whether these motivations were associated with different demographic, behavioral, and personality profiles in three diverse samples. Third, we examined whether peoples' motivations were related to responses to vegetarian advocacy materials. We created the Vegetarian Eating Motives Inventory, a 15-item measure whose structure was invariant across three samples (N = 1006, 1004, 5478) and two languages (English and Dutch). Using this measure, we found that health was the most common motive for non-vegetarians to consider vegetarian diets and it had the broadest array of correlates, which primarily involved communal and agentic values. Correlates of environmental and animal rights motives were limited, but these motives were strong and specific predictors of advocacy materials in a fourth sample (N = 739). These results provide researchers with a useful tool for identifying vegetarian motives among both vegetarian and non-vegetarian respondents, offer useful insights into the nomological net of vegetarian motivations, and provide advocates with guidance about how to best target campaigns promoting a vegetarian diet.


Subject(s)
Animal Rights/statistics & numerical data , Diet, Vegetarian/psychology , Environmental Health , Feeding Behavior/psychology , Health Behavior , Motivation , Vegetarians/psychology , Adult , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vegetarians/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
4.
J Interpers Violence ; 24(6): 1036-56, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18544751

ABSTRACT

Cross-reporting legislation, which permits child and animal welfare investigators to refer families with substantiated child maltreatment or animal cruelty for investigation by parallel agencies, has recently been adopted in several U.S. jurisdictions. The current study sheds light on the underlying assumption of these policies-that animal cruelty and family violence commonly co-occur. Exposure to family violence and animal cruelty is retrospectively assessed using a sample of 860 college students. Results suggest that animal abuse may be a red flag indicative of family violence in the home. Specifically, about 60% of participants who have witnessed or perpetrated animal cruelty as a child also report experiences with child maltreatment or domestic violence. Differential patterns of association were revealed between childhood victimization experiences and the type of animal cruelty exposure reported. This study extends current knowledge of the links between animal- and human-directed violence and provides initial support for the premise of cross-reporting legislation.


Subject(s)
Animal Rights/statistics & numerical data , Child Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Crime Victims/statistics & numerical data , Domestic Violence/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Animal Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Animals , Child , Child Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Crime Victims/legislation & jurisprudence , Domestic Violence/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Students/statistics & numerical data , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL