Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 554
Filter
1.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2753: 151-157, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285337

ABSTRACT

An Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) is an analytical model that describes, through a graphical representation, a linear sequence of biologically connected events at different levels of biological organization, causally leading to an adverse effect on human health or the environment. In general, AOPs are constructed based on five central principles: systematic development and review, chemical-agnostic, modular, networks, and living documents. Furthermore, AOPs have the potential to be used, for example, to investigate certain molecular targets; relate the regulation of specific genes or proteins among AOPs; extrapolate biological processes, pathways, or diseases from one species to another; and even predict adverse effects in particular populations. AOPs also emerge as an alternative to animal experimentation in studies of developmental malformations. It's even possible now to develop a quantitative AOP to predict teratogenic effects for some substances. However, the construction of high-quality AOPs requires standardization in the way these models are developed and reviewed, ensuring an adequate degree of flexibility and guaranteeing efficiency. The development of AOPs should strictly be based on the guidance documents developed by the OECD. Nevertheless, an important step for those developing AOPs is the choice of an apical endpoint or an initiating molecular event in order to initiate the construction of the pathway. Another crucial step is a systematic literature review based on the random combination of the blocks of information. With these two fundamental steps completed, it only remains to follow the guidance documents on Developing and Assessing Adverse Outcome Pathways and AOP Developers' Handbook supplement provided by the OECD to organize and construct an AOP. This modern approach will bring radical changes in the field of toxicity testing, regarding the prediction of apical toxic effects using molecular-level effects.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Teratogenesis , Teratology , Animals , Humans , Dietary Supplements , Animal Use Alternatives
2.
Toxicol Sci ; 198(1): 4-13, 2024 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38134427

ABSTRACT

Throughput needs, costs of time and resources, and concerns about the use of animals in hazard and safety assessment studies are fueling a growing interest in adopting new approach methodologies for use in product development and risk assessment. However, current efforts to define "next-generation risk assessment" vary considerably across commercial and regulatory sectors, and an a priori definition of the biological scope of data needed to assess hazards is generally lacking. We propose that the absence of clearly defined questions that can be answered during hazard assessment is the primary barrier to the generation of a paradigm flexible enough to be used across varying product development and approval decision contexts. Herein, we propose a biological questions-based approach (BQBA) for hazard and safety assessment to facilitate fit-for-purpose method selection and more efficient evidence-based decision-making. The key pillars of this novel approach are bioavailability, bioactivity, adversity, and susceptibility. This BQBA is compared with current hazard approaches and is applied in scenarios of varying pathobiological understanding and/or regulatory testing requirements. To further define the paradigm and key questions that allow better prediction and characterization of human health hazard, a multidisciplinary collaboration among stakeholder groups should be initiated.


Subject(s)
Animal Use Alternatives , Risk Assessment , Animals , Humans , Risk Assessment/methods
5.
Cancer Discov ; 13(4): 805, 2023 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36856308

ABSTRACT

The FDA Modernization Act 2.0 allows companies to submit nonanimal data using certain alternative technologies to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of investigational drugs prior to human trials. Animal rights supporters hope the law represents a shift away from animal use, but researchers caution that organ-chips and other innovations, although potentially valuable, cannot replace animal models to test drugs in development.


Subject(s)
Animal Use Alternatives , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , United States Food and Drug Administration , Animals , Humans , United States , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/standards
8.
Rio de Janeiro; s.n; 2023. 91 f p. ilus, tab.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1435321

ABSTRACT

Abordagens interdisciplinares vêm ganhando maior reconhecimento e destaque nas comunidades de saúde humana e animal, principalmente pela (re)emergência de diversas doenças infecciosas que emanam da interface humano-animal-ambiente. A raiva, zoonose grave, considerada endêmica no Brasil e globalmente negligenciada, é um exemplo. Tanto a vigilância epidemiológica quanto a confirmação dessa doença dependem do diagnóstico laboratorial, que é realizado, frequentemente, por meio dos testes de Imunofluorescência Direta (IFD) e de Isolamento Viral em Camundongo (IVC), via inoculação intracerebral da amostra suspeita em camundongos lactentes ou desmamados. Entretanto, recentemente, a Organização Mundial da Saúde reconheceu a Transcrição Reversa seguida da Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase (RT-PCR) como uma técnica primária válida para esse diagnóstico, podendo ser empregada como alternativa ao uso de animais, evitando sofrimento e morte. Esta dissertação apresenta uma discussão sobre as implicações técnicas e éticas da (não) adoção desse método substitutivo, considerando que todos os animais devem ser respeitados e entendidos como sujeitos singulares em suas percepções do mundo, não como objetos de pesquisa. Esse fato corrobora a necessidade de novas perspectivas que ressignifiquem nossas relações com os animais não humanos, o que é primordial para o estabelecimento de mudanças sistêmicas, de caráter ético-político, que visem o fim da instrumentalização animal e de seu uso no âmbito científico, bem como de qualquer forma de opressão.


Interdisciplinary approaches have been gaining greater recognition and prominence in the human and animal health communities, mainly due to the (re)emergence of several infectious diseases that emanate from the human-animal-environment interface. Rabies is an example, considered a serious zoonosis endemic in Brazil and globally neglected. Both epidemiological surveillance and confirmation of this disease depend on laboratory diagnosis, which is usually performed by the direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT) and the mouse inoculation test (MIT) via intracranial inoculation of the suspected sample into suckling or weanling mice. However, the World Health Organization recently recognized the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as a valid primary technique for this diagnosis, which can replace the use of animals, avoiding suffering and death. This study presents a discussion about the technical and ethical implications of (not) adopting this alternative method, considering that all animals must be respected and understood as unique beings with their perceptions of the world, not as objects of research. It also further corroborates the need for new perspectives that reframe our relationships with non-human animals, which is fundamental for the implementation of systemic ethical-political changes, aiming at the end of animal instrumentalization and use in scientific research, as well as all forms of oppression.


Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Rabies , Bioethics , Animal Experimentation , Ethics, Research , Brazil , Animal Use Alternatives
9.
Altern Lab Anim ; 50(6): 381-413, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36458800

ABSTRACT

The adoption of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes has given a major push to the formation of Three Rs initiatives in the form of centres and platforms. These centres and platforms are dedicated to the so-called Three Rs, which are the Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of animal use in experiments. ATLA's 50th Anniversary year has seen the publication of two articles on European Three Rs centres and platforms. The first of these was about the progressive rise in their numbers and about their founding history; this second part focuses on their current status and activities. This article takes a closer look at their financial and organisational structures, describes their Three Rs focus and core activities (dissemination, education, implementation, scientific quality/translatability, ethics), and presents their areas of responsibility and projects in detail. This overview of the work and diverse structures of the Three Rs centres and platforms is not only intended to bring them closer to the reader, but also to provide role models and show examples of how such Three Rs centres and platforms could be made sustainable. The Three Rs centres and platforms are very important focal points and play an immense role as facilitators of Directive 2010/63/EU 'on the ground' in their respective countries. They are also invaluable for the wide dissemination of information and for promoting the implementation of the Three Rs in general.


Subject(s)
Animal Use Alternatives , Animal Welfare , Animals, Laboratory , Animals , Europe
10.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 128: 105092, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34863906

ABSTRACT

The database of practical examples where toxicokinetic (TK) data has benefitted all stages of the human health risk assessment process are increasingly being published and accepted. This review aimed to highlight and summarise notable examples and to describe the "state of the art" in this field. The overall recommendation is that for any in vivo animal study conducted, measurements of TK should be very carefully considered for inclusion as the numerous benefits this brings continues to grow, particularly during the current march towards animal free toxicology testing and ambitions to eventually conduct human health risk assessments entirely based upon non-animal methods.


Subject(s)
Toxicity Tests/methods , Toxicokinetics , Toxicology/organization & administration , Animal Use Alternatives/methods , Animal Use Alternatives/standards , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Models, Animal , Reference Values , Risk Assessment , Species Specificity , Toxicity Tests/standards , Toxicology/legislation & jurisprudence , Toxicology/standards
11.
Lab Anim ; 56(3): 259-269, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34515569

ABSTRACT

An integrated rearing system for Cantareus aspersus under environmental conditions in an experimental orchard is proposed. In this study, the natural behaviour, circadian rhythms and suitable rearing conditions of the edible snail were optimised to produce homogeneous growth and low variability. The growth was standardised, and growth pattern fit was assessed with various models. One thousand fry were cultured in the orchard, and a random sample of 100 snails were measured weekly for 23 weeks. The rearing system had the following characteristics: snails and earthworms were included in the experimental rearing orchard; a homogeneous group of juvenile snails of the same age and size and high rearing density (500 snails/m2) was used; snails were fed with layers mash ad libitum; and mixed and fringes vegetation was planted in the orchard. A commercial size of 60% of snails was achieved in 21 weeks and 95% in 23 weeks. The different models showed a good fit, and the quadratic model obtained the best fit. This experimental snail orchard proposal can be extended to other areas, although it must be corrected according to different environmental conditions and fit to other species of interest. This experimental model could constitute a viable alternative to traditional models of animal experimentation with mammals, and given its high adaptability, it could be applied in different fields of science.


Subject(s)
Animal Use Alternatives , Animals
13.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 9(5): e00863, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34609088

ABSTRACT

Animal experimentation has been fundamental in biological and biomedical research. To guarantee the maximum quality, efficacy and/or safety of products intended for the use in humans in vivo testing is necessary; however, for over 60 years, alternative methods have been developed in response to the necessity to reduce the number of animals used in experimentation, to guarantee their welfare; resorting to animal models only when strictly necessary. The three Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), seek to ensure the rational and respectful use of laboratory animals and maintain an adequate projection in terms of bioethical considerations. This article describes different approaches to apply 3Rs in preclinical experimentation for either research or regulatory purposes.


Subject(s)
Animal Use Alternatives/methods , Computer Simulation , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , In Vitro Techniques , Animals , Biomedical Research , Drug Approval , Drug Development
14.
MAbs ; 13(1): 1950265, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34281490

ABSTRACT

Recent recommendations from the European Union Reference Laboratory regarding the generation of antibodies using animals have stimulated significant debate. Here, four of the scientists who served on the Scientific Advisory Committee provide clarification of their views regarding the use of animals and in vitro platforms in antibody generation.Abbreviations: EURL ECVAM, European Union Reference Laboratory for alternatives to animal testing. ESAC, EURL ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee.


Subject(s)
Animal Use Alternatives , Antibodies , European Union , Humans
15.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 125: 105002, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34245825

ABSTRACT

Depression is the world's predominant mental health problem and a leading cause of disability. Neuropharmacological research has not yet advanced treatments to sufficiently meet clinical need, largely due to the failure of animal models to predict clinical efficacy. The forced swim test (FST) has been extensively used in the field of antidepressant research but has been under scrutiny due to its perceived severity to animals. Any use of animals in experiments and testing must have a scientific or regulatory purpose and researchers need to ensure that there is no scientifically valid alternative. However, regulatory requirements have been incorrectly cited as a reason to support the use of the FST. More research is required on tests that do not involve stressing animals as replacements for the FST. Non-behavioural neurochemical measures might provide a means to advance neuropharmacological developments while reducing animal suffering. For example, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may be promising.


Subject(s)
Animal Use Alternatives/methods , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/blood , Animal Experimentation/ethics , Animal Experimentation/legislation & jurisprudence , Animals , Biomarkers , Disease Models, Animal , Rodentia , United Kingdom
16.
Eur J Protistol ; 79: 125803, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34044354

ABSTRACT

Insulin activity is generally determined by an in vivo rabbit blood glucose drop assay in research and industriel laboratories. The humane experimental techniques imply the use of alternative invertebrate organisms in place of animals, known as replacement rule of the 3Rs. In this study, we report an alternative in vivo extracellular glucose drop assay using unicellular invertebrate Tetrahymena thermophila to replace the use of rabbit and mouse. This assay has four major steps; growing cells, starving cells, treatment of cells and measurement of glucose drop. In this assay, 0.2 mg/ml of human, porcine and bovine insulins dropped extracellular glucose level to 16%, 14% and 12%, respectively in ten minutes. In addition, mammalian insulins respectively increased the cell area about 19%, 15%, and 16% at 6th hour with statistically significant effect on the cell growth, but not in the cell viability. The results showed that the in vivo Tetrahymena thermophila extracellular glucose drop assay could be used as an alternative assay to replace the mouse or the rabbit insulin blood glucose drop assay.


Subject(s)
Animal Use Alternatives , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Insulin/analysis , Tetrahymena thermophila/metabolism , Animals , Insulin/metabolism , Mammals , Reproducibility of Results
17.
Clin Transl Sci ; 14(5): 1659-1680, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33982436

ABSTRACT

Nonclinical testing has served as a foundation for evaluating potential risks and effectiveness of investigational new drugs in humans. However, the current two-dimensional (2D) in vitro cell culture systems cannot accurately depict and simulate the rich environment and complex processes observed in vivo, whereas animal studies present significant drawbacks with inherited species-specific differences and low throughput for increased demands. To improve the nonclinical prediction of drug safety and efficacy, researchers continue to develop novel models to evaluate and promote the use of improved cell- and organ-based assays for more accurate representation of human susceptibility to drug response. Among others, the three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models present physiologically relevant cellular microenvironment and offer great promise for assessing drug disposition and pharmacokinetics (PKs) that influence drug safety and efficacy from an early stage of drug development. Currently, there are numerous different types of 3D culture systems, from simple spheroids to more complicated organoids and organs-on-chips, and from single-cell type static 3D models to cell co-culture 3D models equipped with microfluidic flow control as well as hybrid 3D systems that combine 2D culture with biomedical microelectromechanical systems. This article reviews the current application and challenges of 3D culture systems in drug PKs, safety, and efficacy assessment, and provides a focused discussion and regulatory perspectives on the liver-, intestine-, kidney-, and neuron-based 3D cellular models.


Subject(s)
Animal Use Alternatives/methods , Cell Culture Techniques, Three Dimensional , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Animal Use Alternatives/standards , Cells, Cultured , Coculture Techniques , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/standards , Humans , Intestines/cytology , Kidney/cytology , Liver/cytology , Neurons , Spheroids, Cellular , Toxicity Tests/methods , Toxicity Tests/standards , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/standards
18.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev ; 174: 317-336, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33905805

ABSTRACT

In 2010, the European Parliament and the European Union adopted a directive on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. The directive aims to protect animals in scientific research, with the final goal of complete replacement of procedures on live animals for scientific and educational purposes as soon as it is scientifically viable. Furthermore, the directive announces the implementation of the 3Rs principle: "When choosing methods, the principles of replacement, reduction and refinement should be implemented through a strict hierarchy of the requirement to use alternative methods." The visibility, accessibility, and the rapid growth of the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) offers a clear advantage for various manipulations and for the simulation of different Bio-Barriers according to the 3R principle. The extensive vascularisation on the CAM provides an excellent substrate for the cultivation of tumour cells or tumour xenografts which could be used for the therapeutic evaluation of nanoscale drug delivery systems. The tumour can be targeted either by topical application, intratumoural injection or i.v. injection. Different application sites and biological barriers can be examined within a single model.


Subject(s)
Chorioallantoic Membrane/drug effects , Drug Delivery Systems , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Animal Use Alternatives , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Chorioallantoic Membrane/metabolism , Humans , Nanoparticles , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays/methods
19.
AAPS J ; 23(2): 34, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33649990

ABSTRACT

In May 2020, the EU Reference Laboratory for alternatives to animal testing (EURL ECVAM) published a recommendation report entitled "Recommendation on nonanimal-derived antibodies". In this report, the EURL ECVAM specifically states: "Therefore, taking into consideration the ESAC Opinion on the scientific validity of replacements for animal-derived antibodies, EURL ECVAM recommends that animals should no longer be used for the development and production of antibodies for research, regulatory, diagnostic and therapeutic applications. The provisions of Directive 2010/63/EU should be respected, and EU countries should no longer authorise the development and production of antibodies through animal immunisation, where robust, legitimate scientific justification is lacking." (1). Here, we are providing the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) opinion on the EURL ECVAM recommendation report. In brief, there has been a clear and strong progress in reduction of animal use in the drug discovery and development process, including significant reduction of animal use in production of antibody reagents. Yet, it is proposed that more data need to be generated, shared and discussed within the scientific community before a decision to implement the change to non-animal derived antibodies is made.


Subject(s)
Animal Use Alternatives/standards , Antibodies, Monoclonal/isolation & purification , Pharmacy/standards , Societies, Pharmaceutical/standards , Technology, Pharmaceutical/standards , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/genetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , European Union , Policy , Recombinant Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/isolation & purification , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , United States
20.
Pharm Res ; 38(4): 583-592, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33782838

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop a useful antibody PK evaluation tool using a combination of cassette-dosing and microsampling in mice and monkeys in order to reduce the number of animals used. METHODS: Cetuximab, denosumab, infliximab, and a mixture of the three antibodies, i.e., cassette-dosing, were administered intravenously to cynomolgus monkeys, C57BL/6J mice, and homozygous human neonatal Fc-receptor transgenic (Tg32) mice. Mouse blood was collected from one animal continuously via the jugular vein at nine points. RESULTS: In cynomolgus monkeys, infliximab showed faster elimination in the cassette-dosing group than in the single-dose group. Anti-drug antibody production was observed, but the PK parameters of the clearance and distribution volume were similar in both groups. In C57BL/6J and Tg32 mice, each of the plasma concentrations-time profiles after cassette-dosing were similar to those after single dosing. PK evaluation using a combination of cassette-dosing and microsampling in mice may reduce the number of mice used by approximately 90% compared with the conventional method. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of antibody cassette-dosing and microsampling is a promising PK evaluation method as a high-throughput and reliable with reduced numbers of mice and cynomolgus monkeys.


Subject(s)
Animal Use Alternatives/methods , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Feasibility Studies , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/genetics , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/metabolism , Humans , Macaca fascicularis , Male , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Models, Animal , Receptors, Fc/genetics , Receptors, Fc/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...