ABSTRACT
Rapid advances in assisted reproductive technology have revolutionized fertility treatments for couples worldwide seeking a pregnancy. Although this is promising, concerns are emerging over the overuse of unnecessary assisted conception treatments, particularly among couples with anovulatory subfertility. Some experts are calling for the cessation of ovulation induction as the primary treatment of anovulatory subfertility in favour of more sophisticated assisted conception treatments. In the absence of other causes of subfertility, ovulation induction in patients with type 1 and type 2 anovulation disorders can achieve an up to 80% ovulation rate with a 40% cumulative pregnancy rate and few adverse effects. Considering the various risks and high costs associated with assisted reproductive technology treatments, it is hard to argue for their cost-effectiveness when simpler, safer and cheaper pharmacological ovulation induction could achieve comparable pregnancy rates. We argue here for the safe, effective and ethical use of ovulation induction in this population, supplemented by a judicious use of assisted conception treatments. We emphasize the essential role of ovulation induction as a first-line intervention for couples with anovulatory subfertility delivered within a patient-centred multidisciplinary care model and with a clear escalation pathway to use assisted reproductive technology treatments based on the person's response, characteristics and treatment preference.
Subject(s)
Anovulation , Infertility , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Anovulation/drug therapy , Infertility/complications , Fertilization , Ovulation , Ovulation Induction/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study the involvement of microribonucleic acids (miRNAs) in the pathogenesis of chronic anovulation and mechanism of metformin treatment in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). DESIGN: Case-control and prospective validation cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PATIENT(S): A total of 146 patients with PCOS and chronic anovulation and 20 non-PCOS controls were enrolled. Patients who resumed ovulation after metformin treatment (MET-OV) and remained anovulatory after metformin treatment (MET-AO) were assigned to MET-OV and MET-AO groups, respectively. INTERVENTION(S): All patients with PCOS received metformin treatment for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Baseline and chronological changes in the plasma levels of 14 miRNAs (miR-21, 93, 132, 193b, 221, 222, 223, 27a, 125b, 200b, 212, 320a, 429, and 483) selected by literature review, anthropometric data, and hormonal as well as metabolic profiles were measured. Predictive modeling based on baseline circulatory miRNA levels and clinical parameters was performed to predict ovulation recovery after metformin treatment. RESULT(S): No significant differences were observed in the baseline hormonal and metabolic profiles between the MET-OV and MET-AO groups. However, the expression of miR-27a, miR-93, and miR-222 was significantly higher in the MET-OV group than that for the MET-AO and control groups. After 6 months of metformin treatment, the levels of insulin, luteinizing hormone, and 6 circulating miRNAs (miR-21, 27a, 93, 221, 222, and 223) and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance decreased significantly in the MET-OV group, but remained unchanged in the MET-AO group. The area under curve, sensitivity, and specificity of the adjusted prediction model, based on miRNA levels and clinical parameters using logistic regression analysis for predicting ovulatory response after metformin treatment, were 0.807, 0.892, and 0.632, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): The present study demonstrated a distinct pattern of baseline expression and chronological changes in the levels of several circulatory miRNAs between the MET-OV and MET-AO groups, suggesting that aberrantly overexpressed diabetogenic miRNAs are involved in the pathophysiology of chronic anovulation in PCOS, and their down-regulation might contribute toward the therapeutic effects of metformin. This could provide new insights into the mechanism of action and applicability of individualized metformin therapy in women with PCOS.
Subject(s)
Anovulation , Metformin , MicroRNAs , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Humans , Female , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/diagnosis , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/genetics , Metformin/therapeutic use , Anovulation/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , MicroRNAs/geneticsABSTRACT
The use of flunixin-meglumine (a potent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) during the critical period of intrafollicular prostaglandin production before ovulation (24 and 36 h after hCG treatment) results in a high rate of ovulatory failure and formation of haemorrhagic anovulatory follicles (HAF) in the mare. Dexamethasone is commonly used to prevent persistent mating-induced endometritis in susceptible mares, but the effect on ovulation blockage within the pre-ovulatory critical window of intrafollicular prostaglandins production following hCG administration has not been determined. Six mares were followed during four consecutive cycles in a crossover design; once in oestrus with a follicle of >32 mm in diameter, mares were treated with hCG (Hour 0) and assigned to one of 4 groups randomly: 1) FM, mares received 1.7 mg/kg flunixin-meglumine at Hour 24 and 36; 2) CON, mares received no further treatment. 3) DEX1, mares received 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone at Hour 24, and 4) DEX2, mares received 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone at Hour 24 and 36. For all groups, ovulation and HAF rates, endometrial oedema profiles and the inter-ovulatory intervals (IOI) were determined and compared statistically. All CON and DEX mares ovulated normally and did not form any HAF. On the contrary, FM mares developed a HAF in 83% of cycles (P < 0.01). The endometrial oedema score was lower following DEX administration than FM (P < 0.05). The mean IOI was longer (P < 0.05) in DEX1 and DEX2 groups (26.5 and 26 days, respectively) than in CON and FM groups (21.5 and 22 days, respectively). In conclusion, dexamethasone treatment given either once or twice during the critical window of hCG-induced ovulation did not block or delay ovulation, but had a similar ovulation rate than untreated control mares. However, the inter-ovulatory intervals of dexamethasone treated mares was longer than control and FM treated mares. Finally, dexamethasone treatment was more effective in reducing endometrial oedema than FM.
Subject(s)
Anovulation , Horse Diseases , Female , Horses , Animals , Ovulation , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anovulation/drug therapy , Anovulation/veterinary , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Meglumine/pharmacology , Horse Diseases/drug therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Infertility is recognized as a major global health issue, often associated with significant psychological distress for affected couples. Causes of female infertility include endocrine conditions leading to oligo/anovulation, in addition to structural causes such as tubal, uterine, or peritoneal disorders. Pharmacological treatments, targeting pathways in the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, can improve rates of ovulation, conception, pregnancy, and birth. Some existing therapeutic options are hindered by limited efficacy or by a non-physiological mechanism, which can risk excessive stimulation and treatment-related adverse effects. Therefore, there is a continued need for novel therapies to improve care for patients suffering with infertility. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors focus on endocrine causes of oligo/anovulation in women and on advances in assisted reproductive technology. Current pharmacological treatments and putative future therapeutic avenues in development to aid fertility in women are outlined. EXPERT OPINION: A deeper understanding of the reproductive neuroendocrine network governing hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone release can offer novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of female subfertility, leading to improved clinical outcomes, less invasive routes of administration, and decreased treatment-related side-effects. The ultimate aim of development in female subfertility is to offer therapeutic interventions that are effective, reproducible, associated with minimal risks, and have an acceptable route of administration.
Subject(s)
Anovulation , Infertility, Female , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Infertility, Female/etiology , Anovulation/complications , Anovulation/drug therapy , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complications , Ovulation , Gonadotropins/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of infrequent periods (oligomenorrhoea) and absence of periods (amenorrhoea). It affects about 5% to 20% of women worldwide and often leads to anovulatory infertility. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a class of drugs that were introduced for ovulation induction in 2001. Since about 2001 clinical trials have reached differing conclusions as to whether the AI, letrozole, is at least as effective as the first-line treatment clomiphene citrate (CC), a selective oestrogen receptor modulator (SERM). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AIs (letrozole) (with or without adjuncts) compared to SERMs (with or without adjuncts) for infertile women with anovulatory PCOS for ovulation induction followed by timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following sources, from their inception to 4 November 2021, to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO. We also checked reference lists of relevant trials, searched the trial registers and contacted experts in the field for any additional trials. We did not restrict the searches by language or publication status. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all RCTs of AIs used alone or with other medical therapies for ovulation induction in women of reproductive age with anovulatory PCOS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted the data and assessed risks of bias using RoB 1. We pooled trials where appropriate using a fixed-effect model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for most outcomes, and risk differences (RDs) for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The primary outcomes were live birth rate and OHSS rate. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates. We assessed the certainty of the evidence for each comparison using GRADE methods. MAIN RESULTS: This is a substantive update of a previous review; of six previously included trials, we excluded four from this update and moved two to 'awaiting classification' due to concerns about validity of trial data. We included five additional trials for this update that now includes a total of 41 RCTs (6522 women). The AI, letrozole, was used in all trials. Letrozole compared to SERMs with or without adjuncts followed by timed intercourse Live birth rates were higher with letrozole (with or without adjuncts) compared to SERMs followed by timed intercourse (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.11; I2 = 0%; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 10; 11 trials, 2060 participants; high-certainty evidence). This suggests that in women with a 20% chance of live birth using SERMs, the live birth rate in women using letrozole with or without adjuncts would be 27% to 35%. There is high-certainty evidence that OHSS rates are similar with letrozole or SERMs (0.5% in both arms: risk difference (RD) -0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01; I2 = 0%; 10 trials, 1848 participants; high-certainty evidence). There is evidence for a higher pregnancy rate in favour of letrozole (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.98; I2 = 0%; NNTB = 10; 23 trials, 3321 participants; high-certainty evidence). This suggests that in women with a 24% chance of clinical pregnancy using SERMs, the clinical pregnancy rate in women using letrozole with or without adjuncts would be 32% to 39%. There is little or no difference between treatment groups in the rate of miscarriage per pregnancy (25% with SERMs versus 24% with letrozole: OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.32; I2 = 0%; 15 trials, 736 participants; high-certainty evidence) and multiple pregnancy rate (2.2% with SERMs versus 1.6% with letrozole: OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.32; I2 = 0%; 14 trials, 2247 participants; high-certainty evidence). However, a funnel plot showed mild asymmetry, indicating that some trials in favour of SERMs might be missing. Letrozole compared to laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) One trial reported very low-certainty evidence that live birth rates may be higher with letrozole compared to LOD (OR 2.07, 95% CI 0.99 to 4.32; 1 trial, 141 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This suggests that in women with a 22% chance of live birth using LOD with or without adjuncts, the live birth rate in women using letrozole with or without adjuncts would be 24% to 47%. No trial reported OHSS rates. Due to the low-certainty evidence we are uncertain if letrozole improves pregnancy rates compared to LOD (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.28; I² = 0%; 3 trials, 367 participants; low-certainty evidence). This suggests that in women with a 29% chance of clinical pregnancy using LOD with or without adjuncts, the clinical pregnancy rate in women using letrozole with or without adjuncts would be 28% to 45%. There seems to be no evidence of a difference in miscarriage rates per pregnancy comparing letrozole to LOD (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.92; I² = 0%; 3 trials, 122 participants; low-certainty evidence). This also applies to multiple pregnancies (OR 3.00, 95% CI 0.12 to 74.90; 1 trial, 141 participants; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole appears to improve live birth rates and pregnancy rates in infertile women with anovulatory PCOS, compared to SERMs, when used for ovulation induction, followed by intercourse. There is high-certainty evidence that OHSS rates are similar with letrozole or SERMs. There was high-certainty evidence of no difference in miscarriage rate and multiple pregnancy rate. We are uncertain if letrozole increases live birth rates compared to LOD. In this update, we added good quality trials and removed trials with concerns over data validity, thereby upgrading the certainty of the evidence base.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , Anovulation , Infertility, Female , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Anovulation/complications , Anovulation/drug therapy , Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Clomiphene/adverse effects , Female , Fertility Agents, Female/adverse effects , Humans , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Infertility, Female/etiology , Letrozole/therapeutic use , Live Birth/epidemiology , Ovulation Induction/methods , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anovulation is one of the main causes of female infertility. This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Bushen Culuan Decoction for anovulatory infertility caused by six diseases, including anovulatory abnormal uterine bleeding, polycystic ovarian syndrome, hyperprolactinemia, luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome, corpus luteum insufficiency, and premature ovarian insufficiency. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, parallel, positively controlled, adaptive, multicenter clinical trial. All participants will be randomly allocated by a central randomization system to the treatment group or the control group in a 1:1 ratio. The treatment group will undergo a 14-day treatment with Bushen Culuan Decoction 13 g three times a day and a 5-day treatment with clomiphene citrate placebo tablets 50 mg once a day starting on day 5 of every menstrual period. The control group will undergo a 14-day treatment with Bushen Culuan Decoction placebo 13 g three times a day and a 5-day treatment with clomiphene citrate tablets 50 mg once a day from day 5 in every menstrual period. The whole treatment will last through 3 menstrual periods or 6 menstrual periods, depending on whether ovulation is regained in the first 3 menstrual periods. All statistical analyses will be performed in SPSS 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA), and a p value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. DISCUSSION: The objective of this RCT is to evaluate whether Bushen Culuan Decoction enables a higher pregnancy rate than clomiphene citrate in women with anovulatory infertility and to identify the anovulatory diseases for which Bushen Culuan Decoction has higher effectiveness .This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Xiyuan Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (No. 2017XLA037-2). The results of this study will be offered for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03709849 . Registered on 19 November 2018.
Subject(s)
Anovulation , Fertility Agents, Female , Infertility, Female , Anovulation/drug therapy , Clomiphene/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fertility Agents, Female/adverse effects , Fertility Agents, Female/therapeutic use , Humans , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complications , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
Polycystic ovary syndrome is a frequent endocrinopathy, affecting between 8% and 13% of women of childbearing age and characterized by hyperandrogenism, chronic anovulation and polycystic ovary morphology. Women with PCOS also have a higher prevalence of obesity, metabolic disorders and an increased risk of diabetes, systemic hypertension and dyslipidemia. The first-line treatment for women with PCOS who do not plan to conceive in the short term includes lifestyle changes and combined oral contraceptives, offering, in addition to contraception, endometrial protection and reduction of hyperandrogenism. Progestin-only contraceptives are recommended for women with contraindications to estrogen contained in combined oral contraceptives. Cosmetic procedures can be added to pharmacological treatment for hirsutism. Severe cases may require anti-androgen drugs which will be combined with contraception. For overweight patients with cardiometabolic risk factors, including insulin resistance or dysglycemia, metformin may also be combined with contraception. In conclusion, the choice of contraception in women with PCOS includes an approach tailored to the individual needs of each patient.
TITLE: Contraception dans le contexte du syndrome des ovaires polykystiques. ABSTRACT: Le syndrome des ovaires polykystiques (SOPK) est une endocrinopathie fréquente, affectant entre 8 et 13 % des femmes en âge de procréer. Elle se caractérise par une hyperandrogénie, une anovulation chronique, et une morphologie polykystique des ovaires. Les femmes qui en sont atteintes ont aussi une prévalence plus élevée d'obésité, de troubles métaboliques, et un risque accru de diabète, d'hypertension artérielle systémique et de dyslipidémie. Le traitement, en première intention, de la femme atteinte du SOPK, en l'absence de projet de grossesse à court terme, consiste en des modifications du mode de vie et en des contraceptions orales combinées offrant, en plus de la contraception, la protection de l'endomètre et la réduction de l'hyperandrogénie. Les contraceptions progestatives seules sont recommandées pour les femmes ayant des contre-indications aux estrogènes qui sont contenus dans les contraceptifs oraux combinés. Des soins esthétiques peuvent aussi être associés au traitement pharmacologique, en cas d'hirsutisme. Les cas les plus graves peuvent nécessiter des médicaments anti-androgènes qui seront associés à la contraception. Pour les patientes en surpoids et ayant des facteurs de risque cardiométaboliques, notamment une résistance à l'insuline ou une hyperglycémie, la metformine peut être associée à la contraception. Le choix de la contraception chez ces femmes repose donc sur une approche adaptée aux besoins individuels de chaque patiente.
Subject(s)
Anovulation , Hyperandrogenism , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Anovulation/drug therapy , Contraception , Female , Hirsutism/drug therapy , Humans , Hyperandrogenism/drug therapy , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapyABSTRACT
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the most common endocrinopathy in women is characterized by polycystic ovaries, chronic anovulation and hyperandrogenism. The treatment in PCOS is mainly symptomatic and involves lifestyle interventions and medications such as Metformin, Oral contraceptives and Antiandrogens. However, the management of PCOS is challenging and current interventions are not able to deal with outcomes of this syndrome. This review encompasses latest pharmacotherapeutic and non-pharmacotherapeutic interventions currently in use to tackle various symptomatic contentions in PCOS. Our focus has been mainly on novel therapeutic modalities for treatment/management of PCOS, like use of newer insulin sensitizers viz., Inositols, Glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) agonists, Dipeptidyl pepdidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. Also, evidence suggesting the use of vitamin D, statins, and Letrozole as emerging therapies in PCOS have been summarized in this review. Additionally, novel cosmetic techniques like electrolysis, laser and use of topically applied eflornithine to tackle the most distressing feature of facial hirsutism associated with PCOS, non-pharmacological therapy like acupuncture and the role of herbal medicine in PCOS management have also been discussed.
Subject(s)
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Laser Therapy , Letrozole/therapeutic use , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/therapy , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Acupuncture , Anovulation/complications , Anovulation/drug therapy , Eflornithine/therapeutic use , Female , Herbal Medicine , Hirsutism/complications , Hirsutism/drug therapy , Humans , Hyperandrogenism/drug therapy , Metformin/therapeutic use , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complicationsABSTRACT
A population of cows with excess androstenedione (A4; High A4) in follicular fluid, with follicular arrest, granulosa cell dysfunction, and a 17% reduction in calving rate was previously identified. We hypothesized that excess A4 in the ovarian microenvironment caused the follicular arrest in High A4 cows and that vascular endothelial growth factor A would rescue the High A4 phenotype. In trial 1, prior to culture, High A4 ovarian cortex (n = 9) had greater numbers of early stage follicles (primordial) and fewer later-stage follicles compared to controls (n = 11). Culture for 7 days did not relieve this follicular arrest; instead, High A4 ovarian cortex had increased indicators of inflammation, anti-Mullerian hormone, and A4 secretion compared to controls. In trial 2, we tested if vascular endothelial growth factor A isoforms could rescue the High A4 phenotype. High A4 (n = 5) and control (n = 5) ovarian cortex was cultured with (1) PBS, (2) VEGFA165 (50 ng/mL), (3) VEGFA165B (50 ng/mL), or (4) VEGFA165 + VEGFA165B (50 ng/mL each) for 7 days. Follicular progression increased with VEGFA165 in High A4 cows with greater early primary, primary, and secondary follicles than controls. Similar to trial 1, High A4 ovarian cortex secreted greater concentrations of A4 and other steroids and had greater indicators of inflammation compared to controls. However, VEGFA165 rescued steroidogenesis, oxidative stress, and fibrosis. The VEGFA165 and VEGFA165b both reduced IL-13, INFα, and INFß secretion in High A4 cows to control levels. Thus, VEGFA165 may be a potential therapeutic to restore the ovarian steroidogenic microenvironment and may promote folliculogenesis.
Subject(s)
Androstenedione/analysis , Anovulation/veterinary , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Inflammation/drug therapy , Ovarian Follicle/drug effects , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/administration & dosage , Androstenedione/metabolism , Animals , Anovulation/drug therapy , Anovulation/physiopathology , Anti-Mullerian Hormone/metabolism , Cattle , Cytokines/metabolism , Female , Fibrosis , Follicular Fluid/chemistry , Ovarian Follicle/physiopathology , Ovary/metabolism , Ovary/pathology , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Protein Isoforms/administration & dosage , Tissue Culture Techniques/veterinaryABSTRACT
Introduction: Cytochrome P450 2D6, 3A4 and 3A5 are involved in the metabolism of many drugs. These enzymes have a genetic polymorphism responsible for different metabolic phenotypes. They play a role in the metabolism of clomiphene citrate (CC), which is used to induce ovulation. Response to CC treatment is variable, and no predictive factors have thus far been identified. Objective: To study a possible link between the cytochrome P450 2D6, 3A4 and 3A5 polymorphisms and clinical response to CC. Study Design: Seventy-seven women with anovulatory Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) treated with CC were included which determined their cytochrome P450 2D6, 3A4 and 3A5 genotypes and used the results to predict ovarian response to this drug. Predicted responses based on the cytochrome genotypes were compared with the observed clinical responses using the calculation of a weighted Kappa coefficient. Main Outcome Measures: Number of dominant follicles assessed by ultrasound at the end of the follicular phase and confirmation of ovulation by blood progesterone assay in the luteal phase. Results: Concordance between the predicted and observed responses for the combination of the three cytochromes was 36.71%, with a negative Kappa coefficient (K = -0.0240), which corresponds to a major disagreement. Similarly, for predictions based on the cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype alone, only 39.24% of predictions were verified (coefficient K = -0.0609). Conclusion: The genetic polymorphism of cytochromes P450 2D6, 3A4 and 3A5 does not appear to influence clinical response to CC used to induce ovulation in anovulatory PCOS women.
Subject(s)
Anovulation , Clomiphene/therapeutic use , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/genetics , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Adult , Anovulation/drug therapy , Anovulation/genetics , Female , Fertility Agents, Female/therapeutic use , France , Genetic Association Studies , Humans , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Infertility, Female/genetics , Pharmacogenomic Variants/genetics , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/physiology , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder in reproductive-aged women, characterized by hyperandrogenism, oligo/anovulation, and polycystic ovarian morphology. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs), along with lifestyle modifications, represent the first-line medical treatment for the long-term management of PCOS. Containing low doses of estrogen and different types of progestin, COCs restore menstrual cyclicity, improve hyperandrogenism, and provide additional benefits such as reducing the risk of endometrial cancer. However, potential cardiometabolic risk associated with these agents has been a concern. COCs increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), related both to the dose of estrogen and the type of progestin involved. Arterial thrombotic events related to COC use occur much less frequently, and usually not a concern for young patients. All patients diagnosed with PCOS should be carefully evaluated for cardiometabolic risk factors at baseline, before initiating a COC. Age, smoking, obesity, glucose intolerance or diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, thrombophilia, and family history of VTE should be recorded. Patients should be re-assessed at consecutive visits, more closely if any baseline cardiometabolic risk factor is present. Individual risk assessment is the key in order to avoid unfavorable outcomes related to COC use in women with PCOS.
Subject(s)
Anovulation , Hyperandrogenism , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Adult , Anovulation/chemically induced , Anovulation/complications , Anovulation/drug therapy , Contraception , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hyperandrogenism/complications , Hyperandrogenism/diagnosis , Hyperandrogenism/drug therapy , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complicationsABSTRACT
STUDY QUESTION: Is endometrial thickness (EMT) a biomarker to select between women who should switch to gonadotropins and those who could continue clomiphene citrate (CC) after six failed ovulatory cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: Using a cut-off of 7 mm for EMT, we can distinguish between women who are better off switching to gonadotropins and those who could continue CC after six earlier failed ovulatory CC cycles. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: For women with normogonadotropic anovulation, CC has been a long-standing first-line treatment in conjunction with intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI). We recently showed that a switch to gonadotropins increases the chance of live birth by 11% in these women over continued treatment with CC after six failed ovulatory cycles, at a cost of 15 258 per additional live birth. It is unclear whether EMT can be used to identify women who can continue on CC with similar live birth rates without the extra costs of gonadotropins. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Between 8 December 2008 and 16 December 2015, 666 women with CC failure were randomly assigned to receive an additional six cycles with a change to gonadotropins (n = 331) or an additional six cycles continuing with CC (n = 335), both in conjunction with intercourse or IUI. The primary outcome was conception leading to live birth within 8 months after randomisation. EMT was measured mid-cycle before randomisation during their sixth ovulatory CC cycle. The EMT was available in 380 women, of whom 190 were allocated to gonadotropins and 190 were allocated to CC. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: EMT was determined in the sixth CC cycle prior to randomisation. We tested for interaction of EMT with the treatment effect using logistic regression. We performed a spline analysis to evaluate the association of EMT with chance to pregnancy leading to a live birth in the next cycles and to determine the best cut-off point. On the basis of the resulting cut-off point, we calculated the relative risk and 95% CI of live birth for gonadotropins versus CC at EMT values below and above this cut-off point. Finally, we calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Mid-cycle EMT in the sixth cycle interacted with treatment effect (P < 0.01). Spline analyses showed a cut-off point of 7 mm. There were 162 women (45%) who had an EMT ≤ 7 mm in the sixth ovulatory cycle and 218 women (55%) who had an EMT > 7 mm. Among the women with EMT ≤ 7 mm, gonadotropins resulted in a live birth in 44 of 79 women (56%), while CC resulted in a live birth in 28 of 83 women (34%) (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.19). Per additional live birth with gonadotropins, the ICER was 9709 (95% CI: 5117 to 25 302). Among the women with EMT > 7 mm, gonadotropins resulted in a live birth in 53 of 111 women (48%) while CC resulted in a live birth in 52 of 107 women (49%) (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.75-1.29). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and therefore mid-cycle EMT measurements before randomisation during their sixth ovulatory CC cycle were not available for all included women. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In women with six failed ovulatory cycles on CC and an EMT ≤ 7 mm in the sixth cycle, we advise switching to gonadotropins, since it improves live birth rate over continuing treatment with CC at an extra cost of 9709 to achieve one additional live birth. If the EMT > 7 mm, we advise to continue treatment with CC, since live birth rates are similar to those with gonadotropins, without the extra costs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The original MOVIN trial received funding from the Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw number: 80-82310-97-12067). C.B.L.A. reports unrestricted grant support from Merck and Ferring. B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548) and reports consultancy for Merck, ObsEva, IGENOMIX and Guerbet. All other authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR1449.
Subject(s)
Anovulation , Anovulation/drug therapy , Birth Rate , Clomiphene/therapeutic use , Endometrium , Female , Gonadotropins , Humans , Live Birth , Netherlands , Ovulation Induction , Pregnancy , Pregnancy RateABSTRACT
Cervical insufficiency is a common problem in obstetrical care. There are not enough studies about its development in women with infertility. The aim of the article was to determine the risk factors of the development of cervical insufficiency in women with infertility associated with anovulation. The object of the study were 308 pregnant women (110 pregnant women with cervical insufficiency and without infertility, 92 pregnant women with infertility associated with anovulation and with cervical insufficiency, 76 pregnant women with infertility associated with anovulation and without cervical insufficiency, 30 pregnant women without cervical insufficiency and infertility (controls)). We analyzed the data of obstetrical anamnesis, gynecological diseases, extragenital pathology. In fertile women with cervical insufficiency the traumatic factor of the cervix (previous labors, gynecological procedures connected with cervical dilatation) was the main in the development of this pathology. While in the women with infertility associated with anovulation the forming of cervical insufficiency was associated with hormonal reasons (hyperandrogenism (OR=3.04, 95 % CI=1.15-8.05, p=0.03), diminished ovarian reserve (OR=6.00, 95 % CI=1.97-18.24, p=0.002), controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin and clomiphene citrate use (OR=3.69, 95% CI=1.93-7.04, p<0.001), use of additional reproductive technology (OR=1.95, 95 % CI=1.05-3.63, p=0.03).
Subject(s)
Anovulation/complications , Cervix Uteri/abnormalities , Gonadotropins/therapeutic use , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Anovulation/drug therapy , Clomiphene/adverse effects , Clomiphene/therapeutic use , Female , Gonadotropins/adverse effects , Humans , Infertility, Female/complications , Infertility, Female/etiology , Pregnancy , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
This document reviews gonadotropin treatment for ovulation induction in anovulatory women and outlines the recommended pretreatment evaluation, indications, treatment regimens, and complications of gonadotropin treatment. It replaces the document with a similar name, last published in 2008 (Fertil Steril 2008;90:S7-12).
Subject(s)
Advisory Committees/standards , Anovulation/drug therapy , Gonadotropins/administration & dosage , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Ovulation Induction/methods , Anovulation/diagnosis , Anovulation/metabolism , Female , Humans , Infertility, Female/diagnosis , Infertility, Female/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of gonadotrophins as a first-line treatment for anovulatory infertility has been limited by a perception of a risk of multi-fetal gestation and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). However, it has recently been recognised as an acceptable first-line treatment if appropriate monitoring is performed. AIMS: To determine the cumulative live birth rate, incidence of multiple gestation, cycle cancellation rate and incidence of OHSS for therapy-naïve anovulatory women undergoing ovulation induction with gonadotrophins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study of 258 patients undergoing ovulation induction with a 'low-dose step-up' protocol was performed over a three-year period across two fertility centres (40% of patients were currently or recently prescribed metformin). RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of patients required concurrent use of luteinising hormone. The cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates were 22.5% and 18.2%, 40.3% and 34.5%, 47.7% and 41.1% after completion of the first, second and third cycles of stimulation, respectively, with a median duration of stimulation of 15 days. No patients developed OHSS and 10.5% of cycles were cancelled due to an excessive or no follicular response. The multiple pregnancy rate was 2%. The cumulative pregnancy rate was reduced for women over 35 years of age (23.8 vs 55.3%, P = 0.006) and for women with a body mass index greater than 25 kg/m2 (40.6 vs 56.7%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that ovulation induction with gonadotrophin therapy, in the context of appropriate monitoring, is a safe and effective treatment for young therapy-naïve patients with anovulatory infertility.
Subject(s)
Anovulation/drug therapy , Birth Rate , Gonadotropins/therapeutic use , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Ovulation Induction , Adult , Female , Fertility Agents, Female/therapeutic use , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Multiple/statistics & numerical data , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
The effectiveness of different treatments with recombinant equine FSH to stimulate follicular growth, multiple ovulations and embryo production in seasonally anovulatory mares was evaluated. During mid-winter season (July-August in Argentina, South America) forty light breed donor mares, presenting follicles <10â¯mm in diameter and no CL at ultrasound examination (deep-anestrus), were randomly assigned (nâ¯=â¯10/group) to one of the following treatments: Group 1: twice daily intramuscular (IM) injections of 0.65â¯mg reFSH (AspenBio Pharma, CO), Group 2: once daily IM injection of 1.3â¯mg reFSH, Group 3: twice daily IM injection of 0.32â¯mg reFSH, and Group 4: once daily IM injection of saline (control). Treatment was administered until a follicle of 35â¯mm was observed or for a total period of 10 days. When the largest follicle reached ≥35â¯mm in diameter, treatment was discontinued and 2500 IU hCG was injected intravenously (IV) 36â¯h later. Mares receiving hCG were inseminated with fresh semen every 48â¯h until ovulation(s) were detected or one dose of frozen semen (250â¯×â¯106 motile sperm) after the first ovulation was detected. Eight days after first ovulation, transcervical embryo recovery was performed. Recovered embryos were non-surgically transferred to anovulatory estrogen/progesterone treated recipients and pregnancy diagnosed by ultrasonography 7, 14 and 21 days later. All mares receiving reFSH, but none receiving saline control, responded to the treatment with follicular growth. On average, 6.5 days of reFSH treatment were required for mares to develop follicles of ovulatory size (>35â¯mm). Ovulations were detected in 80% of mares in Groups 1 and 2, 50% of mares in Group 3 and in none of Group 4 (Control). Among ovulating mares, no differences in number of ovulations, number of embryos recovered, or pregnancy rates were observed among reFSH treatments. Of treated mares, 6, 7, and 5 produced embryos in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The average embryo recovery rate per ovulated mare was 88%. The average embryo recovery rate per ovulation was 43%. Overall, a 59% pregnancy rate was achieved. These results indicate that treatment with reFSH during deep anestrus results in follicular development, ovulation of fertile oocytes, and production of embryos that established viable pregnancies after transfer. Also, a single daily administration of reFSH was as effective as two daily administrations, which allows for a simplified administration regimen.
Subject(s)
Anovulation , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/pharmacology , Oocyte Retrieval , Ovulation Induction/methods , Pregnancy Rate , Superovulation/drug effects , Tissue Donors , Animals , Anovulation/drug therapy , Anovulation/pathology , Embryo Transfer/methods , Embryo Transfer/veterinary , Female , Horses , Oocyte Retrieval/statistics & numerical data , Oocyte Retrieval/veterinary , Ovulation Induction/veterinary , Pregnancy , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacology , SeasonsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Recent studies reported that in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients, other stimulation agents are superior to the popular first-line regimen, clomiphene citrate (CC) for ovarian stimulation. Nonetheless, CC is still widely used since it is not clear which patients will not respond to it. Furthermore, the prognostic value of endometrium thickness at midcycle is controversial. We aimed to find factors predicting the response to CC and the prognostic value of endometrial thickness at midcycle. METHODS: We collected data retrospectively from 89 anovulatory PCOS patients who had the first stimulation with 50 mg CC. We analyzed the basal levels of AMH, testosterone, LH, LH:FSH ratio and the endometrial thickness at midcycle by univariate, followed by multivariate regression. The outcome measures were pregnancy, follicle maturation and endometrial thickness at midcycle. RESULTS: Stimulation with 50 mg CC resulted in follicle maturation in 50.6% of the women and in 27.0% pregnancies. In the univariate analysis, greater endometrial thickness, lower LH and AMH levels and a lower LH:FSH ratio were associated with pregnancy (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, only endometrial thickness remained predictive (p = 0.045). The endometrial thickness cutoff level of ≥ 8 mm showed a sensitivity of 87.5% (96% CI 67.6-97.3) and a specificity of 66.7% (95% CI 43.0-85.4) for prediction of pregnancy. In the multivariate analysis AMH levels 5.4 (3.4; 7.0) (ng/mL) predicted pregnancy (ß = - 0.194 ± 0.092; p = 0.034) CONCLUSION: We suggest to refrain from CC as first-line regimen in patients with AMH > 7 ng/ml. Under CC treatment, the cutoff value of ≥ 8 mm endometrium thickness at midcycle is associated with a better outcome.
Subject(s)
Anovulation/drug therapy , Anti-Mullerian Hormone/blood , Clomiphene/pharmacology , Endometrium/pathology , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Adult , Anovulation/blood , Anovulation/pathology , Female , Humans , Ovulation Induction/methods , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/blood , Pregnancy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) risk factors overlap with breast cancer, and the hormonal profile may be implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis. This study aims to report a literature review considering epidemiological and molecular mechanisms that correlate PCOS and breast cancer, as well as the influence of PCOS treatment on the incidence of breast cancer. Epidemiological studies failed to adjust potential variables that affect the risk and have thus provided inconclusive results. Molecular effects of androgenic pathways in breast cancer have been studied and androgens seem to have an inhibitory effect on mammary epithelial proliferation. However, increased bioavailable androgens were associated with recurrence of breast cancer due to conversion to oestrogens. Sex hormone-binding globulin has a role in hormone-dependent cancers and can be considered a marker for PCOS; a gene profile has already been linked to breast cancer risk in these patients. PCOS medical treatment is a promising tool for stratifying breast cancer risk due to the metabolic influence and hormonal environment. Clinical reports are inconsistent, emphasizing the need for further studies with a prospective design. In the future, the role of pharmacological interventions in PCOS will increase knowledge and awareness of breast cancer pathogenesis and will help to refine breast cancer risk stratification.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/epidemiology , Androgens/metabolism , Anovulation/drug therapy , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Clomiphene/therapeutic use , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/therapeutic use , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Estrogens/metabolism , Female , Fertility Agents, Female/therapeutic use , Humans , Hyperandrogenism/epidemiology , Hyperandrogenism/metabolism , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Letrozole/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Ovulation Induction , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/metabolism , Risk Factors , Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin/metabolismABSTRACT
A síndrome dos ovários policísticos (SOP) é responsável por cerca de 80% dos casos de infertilidade anovulatória. Não há na literatura evidências suficientes para a definição do tratamento ideal da infertilidade na SOP, mas repete-se que deve ser iniciado por mudanças no estilo de vida, e frequentemente envolve a indução farmacológica da ovulação e, em casos selecionados, as técnicas de reprodução assistida e o drilling ovariano laparoscópico. Este texto pretende reunir informações atuais sobre o manejo da infertilidade em mulheres com SOP e, dessa forma, permitir ao ginecologista a escolha da melhor abordagem, de forma Individualizada e baseada nas melhores evidências disponíveis.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complications , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Anovulation/drug therapy , Ovulation Induction/methods , Acetylcysteine/therapeutic use , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Insemination, Artificial , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Estrogen Receptor Modulators/therapeutic use , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Thiazolidinediones/therapeutic use , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques , Gonadotropins/therapeutic use , Infertility, Female/surgery , Inositol/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
The management of patients with sub-fertility, particularly unexplained sub-fertility, is a sensitive and complex matter. This was a prospective observational study conducted from October 2016 to March 2017 in Galway, Ireland, the aim of which was to identify the clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) in women undergoing ovulation induction (OI) with timed sexual intercourse (TSI) or intrauterine insemination (IUI) and to compare them across two groups: (1) Anovulatory women and (2) ovulatory women with unexplained subfertility. Patients undergoing OI were recruited consecutively and OI regimens were prescribed as per local clinical protocol. The main observation was a higher CPR in the anovulatory group (18%) compared with the ovulatory group (CPR = 10%) (p < 0.05). No difference was observed in the CPR between the TSI and IUI groups. There are many studies to support the use of OI in the treatment of women with anovulatory subfertility, though the use of OI in ovulatory women is a more controversial issue. The treatment options offered to these patients need to be individualized to each couple and should consider their length of infertility, age, and financial means. Due to the lower cost and the less invasive nature of OI-treatment we conclude that a short treatment course could be offered as an acceptable alternative prior to IVF.