ABSTRACT
It is unclear whether norfloxacin predisposes to infections by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). We aimed to evaluate if patients with cirrhosis receiving norfloxacin prophylaxis at the time of the diagnosis of bacterial infections were more likely to present a multidrug-resistant isolate than those without prophylaxis. This is a cross-sectional study of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infections from Argentina and Uruguay (NCT03919032) from September 2018 to December 2020. The outcome variable was a multidrug-resistant bacterial infection. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of norfloxacin on infection caused by MDROs considering potential confounders. Among the 472 patients from 28 centers, 53 (11%) were receiving norfloxacin at the time of the bacterial infection. Patients receiving norfloxacin had higher MELD-sodium, were more likely to have ascites or encephalopathy, to receive rifaximin, beta-blockers, and proton-pump inhibitors, to have a nosocomial or health-care-associated infection, prior bacterial infections, admissions to critical care units or invasive procedures, and to be admitted in a liver transplant center. In addition, we found that 13 (24.5%) patients with norfloxacin and 90 (21.5%) of those not receiving it presented infections caused by MDROs (adjusted OR 1.55; 95% CI: 0.60-4.03; p = 0.360). The use of norfloxacin prophylaxis at the time of the diagnosis of bacterial infections was not associated with multidrug resistance. These results help empiric antibiotic selection and reassure the current indication of norfloxacin prophylaxis in well-selected patients.Study registration number: NCT03919032.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , Peritonitis , Humans , Norfloxacin/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/microbiology , Peritonitis/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effectsSubject(s)
Endophthalmitis , Uveitis, Anterior , Anterior Chamber , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Endophthalmitis/etiology , Fluoroquinolones/adverse effects , Humans , Moxifloxacin , Uveitis, Anterior/chemically induced , Uveitis, Anterior/diagnosis , Uveitis, Anterior/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cefazolin is routinely recommended as the first-line agent for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis because it prevents more surgical site infections than second-line antibiotics. Clinicians often avoid administering cefazolin to patients who are labeled as penicillin allergic due to concerns of cross-reactivity. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions between cefazolin and the second-line antibiotics vancomycin and clindamycin. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who were labeled as penicillin allergic and received either cefazolin, clindamycin, or vancomycin as preoperative antibiotics. The primary outcome was intraoperative hypersensitivity reactions. RESULTS: A total of 734 surgical procedures in 690 patients were included. Fifteen immediate hypersensitivity reactions were identified. Probable hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 3 (0.9%) patients in the cefazolin group, 4 (1.4%) in the clindamycin group, and 1 (1.1%) in the vancomycin group. Seven of 8 patients reported allergies to additional medications beyond penicillin. There were seven cases of possible hypersensitivity reactions, 3 (0.9%) in the cefazolin group, 1 (1.1%) in the vancomycin group, and 3 (1.0%) in the clindamycin group. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that perioperative hypersensitivity reactions are uncommon in patients labeled as penicillin allergic. The frequency of immediate hypersensitivity reactions was not different between patients receiving cefazolin, clindamycin, or vancomycin. Avoiding cefazolin in patients labeled as penicillin allergic may not be warranted.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Cefazolin/adverse effects , Clindamycin/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/chemically induced , Penicillins/adverse effects , Vancomycin/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Clindamycin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Vancomycin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a group of inherited disorders that result in haemoglobin abnormalities and other complications. Injury to the spleen, among other factors, contribute to persons with SCD being particularly susceptible to infection. Infants and very young children are especially vulnerable. The 'Co-operative Study of Sickle Cell Disease' observed an incidence rate for pneumococcal septicaemia of 10 per 100 person-years in children under the age of three years. Vaccines, including customary pneumococcal vaccines, may be of limited use in this age group. Therefore, prophylactic penicillin regimens may be advisable for this population. This is an update of a Cochrane Review which was first published in 2002, and previously updated, most recently in 2017. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis against pneumococcus in children with SCD receiving antibiotic prophylaxis compared to those without in relation to: 1. incidence of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection; 2. mortality (as reported in the included studies); 3. drug-related adverse events (as reported in the included studies) to the individual and the community; 4. the impact of discontinuing at various ages on incidence of infection and mortality. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, which is comprised of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and also two clinical trials registries: ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Registry Platform (not in 2020 given access issues relating to Covid-19 pandemic). Additionally, we carried out hand searching of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Date of the most recent search: 25 January 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing prophylactic antibiotics to prevent pneumococcal infection in children with SCD with placebo, no treatment or a comparator drug. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane were used. Both authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. The authors used the GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Six trials were identified by the searches, of which three trials were eligible for inclusion. A total of 880 children, who were between three months to five years of age at randomization were included. The included studies were conducted in centres in the USA and in Kingston, Jamaica. In trials that investigated initiation of penicillin on risk of pneumococcal infection, the odds ratio was 0.37 (95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.86) (two trials, 457 children) (low-certainty evidence), while for withdrawal the odds ratio was 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.09 to 2.71) (one trial, 400 children) (low-certainty evidence). Adverse drug effects were rare and minor. Rates of pneumococcal infection were found to be relatively low in children over the age of five years. Overall, the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes was judged to be low. The results from the risk of bias assessment undertaken identified two domains in which the risk of bias was considered to be high, these were incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) (two trials) and allocation concealment (selection bias) (one trial). Domains considered to have a low risk of bias for all three trials were selective reporting (reporting bias) and blinding (performance and detection bias). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence examined was determined to be of low certainty and suggests that prophylactic penicillin significantly reduces risk of pneumococcal infection in children with homozygous SCD, and is associated with minimal adverse reactions. Further research may help to determine the ideal age to safely withdraw penicillin.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Age Factors , Anemia, Sickle Cell/genetics , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Bias , Child, Preschool , Hemoglobin SC Disease/complications , Homozygote , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Medication Adherence , Penicillins/adverse effects , Pneumococcal Infections/epidemiology , Pneumococcal Infections/mortality , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Streptococcus pneumoniae , beta-Thalassemia/complicationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS: This was a descriptive study performed at a public tertiary care university hospital gathering prescription, sociodemographic and hospitalization data of inpatients admitted in 2014 who used antimicrobial drugs. This data were obtained from the hospital electronic database. The antimicrobial data were classified according to the anatomical, therapeutic chemical/defined daily dose per 1,000 inpatients. An exploratory analysis was performed using principal component analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5,182 inpatients were prescribed surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Of the total antimicrobial use, 11.7% were for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. The orthopedic, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative units, and postoperative intensive care unit comprised more than half of the total surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use (56.3%). The duration of antimicrobial use of these units were 2.2, 2.0, and 1.4 days, respectively. Third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones had the longest use among antimicrobial classes. CONCLUSION: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was inadequate in the orthopedic, postoperative intensive care, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative, gynecology and obstetrics, and otolaryngology units. Therefore, the development and implementation of additional strategies to promote surgical antibiotic stewardship at hospitals are essential.
Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Drug Utilization Review , Hospitalization , Humans , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & controlABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Clostridioides difficile is the first cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea in developed countries. In recent years the incidence of C. difficile infection (CDI) has increased worldwide. There is not much information on the topic in Mexico, and little is known about the risk factors for the infection in patients that are hospitalized in surgical services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case-control study was conducted that compared the epidemiologic findings and risk factors between surgical patients with PCR-confirmed CDI, surgical patients with diarrhea and a negative PCR test, and surgical patients with no diarrhea. The statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS version 22.0 program. RESULTS: The majority of the surgical patients with CDI belonged to the areas of neurosurgery, cardiac surgery, orthopedics, and general surgery. A total of 53% of the CDI cases were associated with the hypervirulent CD NAP1/027 strain. The presence of mucus in stools (OR: 1.5, P=.001), fever (OR: 1.4, P=.011), leukocytes in stools (OR: 3.2, P<.001), hospitalization within the past 12weeks (OR: 2.0, P<.001), antibiotic use (OR: 1.3, P=.023), and ceftriaxone use (OR: 1.4, P=.01) were independent risk factors for the development of CDI. CONCLUSIONS: C. difficile-induced diarrhea in the surgical services is frequent at the Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde".
Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/complications , Cross Infection/complications , Diarrhea/microbiology , Postoperative Complications/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/etiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/etiology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods: This was a descriptive study performed at a public tertiary care university hospital gathering prescription, sociodemographic and hospitalization data of inpatients admitted in 2014 who used antimicrobial drugs. This data were obtained from the hospital electronic database. The antimicrobial data were classified according to the anatomical, therapeutic chemical/defined daily dose per 1,000 inpatients. An exploratory analysis was performed using principal component analysis. Results: A total of 5,182 inpatients were prescribed surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Of the total antimicrobial use, 11.7% were for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. The orthopedic, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative units, and postoperative intensive care unit comprised more than half of the total surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use (56.3%). The duration of antimicrobial use of these units were 2.2, 2.0, and 1.4 days, respectively. Third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones had the longest use among antimicrobial classes. Conclusion: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was inadequate in the orthopedic, postoperative intensive care, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative, gynecology and obstetrics, and otolaryngology units. Therefore, the development and implementation of additional strategies to promote surgical antibiotic stewardship at hospitals are essential.
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a utilização de antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo descritivo em um hospital universitário de cuidado terciário por meio de coleta de dados de prescrição, sociodemográficos e de hospitalização sobre todos os pacientes internados em 2014 que utilizaram pelo menos um medicamento antimicrobiano. Esses dados foram coletados da base de dados eletrônica do hospital. O consumo de antimicrobianos foi analisado de acordo com a classificação anatômica terapêutica e química/dose diária definida por mil pacientes-dia. Realizou-se uma análise exploratória por meio da análise de componentes principais. Resultados: Um total de 5.182 pacientes internados receberam prescrição de antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica, que corresponde a 11,7% do total de antibióticos utilizados no hospital. As unidades de ortopedia, pós-operatória de cirurgia torácica e cardiovascular e terapia intensiva pós-operatória foram responsáveis pela utilização de mais da metade (56,3%) da antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica. A duração de uso desses antimicrobianos nessas unidades foi 2,2, 2,0 e 2,4 dias, respectivamente. Cefalosporinas de terceira geração e fluoroquinolonas foram as classes de antimicrobianos com tempo de utilização mais longo. Conclusão: A utilização de antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica foi inadequada nas unidades de ortopedia, pós-operatória de cirurgia torácica e cardiovascular, terapia intensiva pós-operatória, ginecologia e obstetrícia e otorrinolarigonlogia. Portanto, são importantes o desenvolvimento e a implantação de estratégias que promovam o uso racional de antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica nos hospitais.
Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Drug Utilization Review , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Hospitalization , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Human milk is an important source of microorganisms for infant gut colonisation. Although the maternal antibiotic prophylaxis is an important strategy to prevent maternal/neonatal sepsis, it has to be investigated how it may affect the human milk microbiota, especially the genus Bifidobacterium, which has been associated to health benefits. Here, we investigated the impact of the maternal antibiotic prophylaxis on the human milk Bifidobacterium spp. and total bacteria counts, in the first week (short-term) and first month (medium-term) after delivery. Human milk samples were collected from 55 healthy lactating women recruited from the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo at days 7±3 and 30±4 after vaginal delivery. Twenty one volunteers had received maternal antibiotic prophylaxis (MAP group) and 34 had not received MAP (no-MAP group) during or after labour. Total DNA was isolated from milk samples, and the bacterial counts were estimated by quantitative PCR (qPCR). We found lower levels of Bifidobacterium in the MAP group in the first week after delivery (median = 2.1 vs 2.4 log of equivalent cells/ml of human milk, for MAP and no-MAP groups, respectively; P=0.01), although there were no statistical differences in total bacteria count. However, no differences were found in Bifidobacterium counts between the groups at day 30±4 (median = 2.5 vs 2.2 log of equivalent cells/ml of human milk, for MAP and no-MAP groups, respectively; P=0.50). Our results suggest that MAP has a significant impact on Bifidobacterium counts in human milk, reducing this population in the first week after delivery. However, throughout the first month after delivery, the Bifidobacterium counts tend to recover, reaching similar counts to those found in no-MAP group at day 30±4 after delivery.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Bacterial Load , Bifidobacterium/drug effects , Bifidobacterium/isolation & purification , Milk, Human/microbiology , Postpartum Period , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Brazil , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Hospitals, University , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Young AdultABSTRACT
Surveillances and interventions on antibiotics use have been suggested to improve serious drug-resistance worldwide. Since 2007, our hospital have proposed many measures for regulating surgical prophylactic antibiotics (carbapenems, third gen. cephalosporins, vancomycin, etc.) prescribing practices, like formulary restriction or replacement for surgical prophylactic antibiotics and timely feedback. To assess the impacts on drug-resistance after interventions, we enrolled infected patients in 2006 (pre-intervention period) and 2014 (post-intervention period) in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai. Proportions of targeted pathogens were analyzed: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE), imipenem-resistant Escherichia coli (IREC), imipenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (IRKP), imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (IRAB) and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IRPA) isolates. Rates of them were estimated and compared between Surgical Department, ICU and Internal Department during two periods. The total proportions of targeted isolates in Surgical Department (62.44%, 2006; 64.09%, 2014) were more than those in ICU (46.13%, 2006; 50.99%, 2014) and in Internal Department (44.54%, 2006; 51.20%, 2014). Only MRSA has decreased significantly (80.48%, 2006; 55.97%, 2014) (p < 0.0001). The percentages of VRE and IREC in 3 departments were all <15%, and the slightest change were also both observed in Surgical Department (VRE: 0.76%, 2006; 2.03%, 2014) (IREC: 2.69%, 2006; 2.63%, 2014). The interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics can be effective for improving resistance; antimicrobial stewardship must be combined with infection control practices.(AU)
Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Infection Control , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Persons with sickle cell disease (SCD) are particularly susceptible to infection. Infants and very young children are especially vulnerable. The 'Co-operative Study of Sickle Cell Disease' observed an incidence rate for pneumococcal septicaemia of 10 per 100 person years in children under the age of three years. Vaccines, including customary pneumococcal vaccines, may be of limited use in this age group. Therefore, prophylactic penicillin regimens may be advisable for this population. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2002, and previously updated, most recently in 2014. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis against pneumococcus in children with SCD in relation to:1. incidence of infection;2. mortality;3. drug-related adverse events (as reported in the included studies) to the individual and the community;4. the impact of discontinuing at various ages on incidence of infection and mortality. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, which is comprised of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and also two clinical trials registries: ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Registry Platform. Additionally, we carried out handsearching of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 19 December 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing prophylactic antibiotics to prevent pneumococcal infection in children with SCD with placebo, no treatment or a comparator drug. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. The authors used the GRADE criteria to assess the quality of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Five trials were identified by the searches, of which three trials (880 children randomised) met the inclusion criteria. All of the included trials showed a reduced incidence of infection in children with SCD (SS or Sß0Thal) receiving prophylactic penicillin. In trials which investigated initiation of penicillin on risk of pneumococcal infection, the odds ratio was 0.37 (95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.86) (two trials, 457 children) (low-quality evidence), while for withdrawal the odds ratio was 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.09 to 2.71) (one trial, 400 children) (low-quality evidence). Adverse drug effects were rare and minor. Rates of pneumococcal infection were found to be relatively low in children over the age of five.Overall, the quality of the evidence for all outcomes was judged to be low. The results from the risk of bias assessment undertaken identified two domains in which the risk of bias was considered to be high, these were incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) (two trials) and allocation concealment (selection bias) (one trial). Domains considered to have a low risk of bias for all three trials were selective reporting (reporting bias) and blinding (performance and detection bias). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence examined suggests that prophylactic penicillin significantly reduces risk of pneumococcal infection in children with homozygous SCD, and is associated with minimal adverse reactions. Further research may help to determine the ideal age to safely withdraw penicillin.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Age Factors , Anemia, Sickle Cell/genetics , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Hemoglobin SC Disease/complications , Homozygote , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Penicillins/adverse effects , Pneumococcal Infections/epidemiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , beta-Thalassemia/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) enjoys high success rates, but repopulation with pathogenic bacteria is 1 of the hallmarks of poorer outcomes. There are many hypothesized sources of repopulating bacteria; however, this process remains largely unexplored. This study examined changes in the sinus microbiome after ESS and medical therapies to identify potential sources for postsurgical microbial repopulation. METHODS: Samples from the anterior nares, ethmoid sinus, and nasopharynx were taken at the time of surgery from 13 subjects undergoing ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Patients were treated postoperatively with 2 weeks of oral antibiotics and saline rinses. The ethmoid sinus was sampled at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively; microbiota were characterized using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing. The Morisita-Horn beta-diversity index (M-H) was used to compare similarity between samples. RESULTS: The bacterial burden of the ethmoid was higher 2 weeks postoperatively than 6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.01). The 6-week samples most closely represented the anterior nares and ethmoid at surgery (M-H = 0.58 and 0.59, respectively), and were least similar to the nasopharynx (M-H = 0.28). Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots illustrate that the ethmoid microbiota temporarily shifted after surgery and antibiotics but returned toward baseline in many subjects. CONCLUSION: Bacterial communities colonizing the ethmoid 6 weeks postoperatively were most similar to anterior nasal cavity and pretreatment sinus microbial profiles, indicating a high degree of resilience in the sinonasal microbiome of most subjects. Interestingly, surgery and postoperative antibiotic therapy does not appear to reduce bacterial burden, but rather, shifts the microbial consortia.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Ethmoid Sinus/microbiology , Microbiota , Nasopharynx/microbiology , Rhinitis/surgery , Sinusitis/surgery , Adult , Aged , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Chronic Disease , Cross-Sectional Studies , Endoscopy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perioperative Care/adverse effects , Perioperative Care/methods , Rhinitis/microbiology , Sinusitis/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study is to compare two types of antimicrobial management used to treat premature rupture of membranes in pregnancy. This study evaluates both duration and the type of antibiotic therapy used for treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The antimicrobials used to treat premature rupture of membranes include a first generation cephalosporin in one group and amoxicillin in the other group. Cephalosporin was used over a 7-day period to treat 38 cases, whereas amoxicillin was used through delivery in 52 cases. Emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram negative bacteria (GNB) on maternal of neonatal sampling was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Emergence of antibiotic resistant GNB can be seen under both antibiotic regimens and appears to be linked to the duration of latency, and to duration of antibiotic treatment. Other outcomes (duration of latency period, gestational age at delivery, maternal and neonatal complications) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic treatment in PPROM favors a selection of GNB. This emergence is positively linked with the duration of latency between rupture of membranes and delivery and with the length of antibiotic administration. The extension of antibiotherapy does not alter other maternal or neonatal parameters.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture/drug therapy , Adult , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/trends , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Female , Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Guadeloupe/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Martinique/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite their widespread use, antibiotics have not been shown to improve chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) outcomes. We aimed to determine whether culture-inappropriate postoperative antibiotic therapy was associated with less quality-of-life (QOL) improvement following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study recruited 376 adult CRS patients undergoing FESS between October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2011. Patient demographics, comorbidities and medications were collected at baseline. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and clindamycin were administered for 2 weeks postoperatively. The antibiotic appropriateness was determined based on bacterial resistance profile of organisms identified during intraoperative culture. The QOL outcome was defined as change of 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test scores from preoperative visit to 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month post-FESS. Clinically significant difference was defined as at least 0.5 standard deviations (SD) of baseline QOL score in the reference group. Mixed-effects regression models were performed. RESULTS: Seven percent of patients (n = 27) had culture-inappropriate antibiotic therapy, and additional 5% (n = 19) had culture-specific antibiotic adjustment. Compared to patients with culture-appropriate antibiotics, patients with culture-inappropriate antibiotics had significantly less improvement of QOL from baseline to postoperative 1-month and 3-month follow-up where the difference became clinically significant; patients with antibiotic adjustment had more QOL improvement from baseline to 1-month follow-up, but their QOL worsened at 3-month follow-up, and these changes were not clinically significant. However, all effects washed out at 6-month follow-up with no significant differences. CONCLUSION: Culture-inappropriate postoperative antibiotic therapy decreased short-term QOL improvement to a clinically meaningful level after FESS. Culture guided selection of antibiotics may improve short-term FESS outcome.
Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Endoscopy , Paranasal Sinuses/drug effects , Rhinitis/therapy , Sinusitis/therapy , Adult , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Chronic Disease , Clindamycin/administration & dosage , Clindamycin/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery , Postoperative Period , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/administration & dosage , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Objetivo: presentar cinco casos y brindar información actualizada sobre el Staphylococcus aureus y su papel en la patogenia de lesiones de piel y partes blandas, así como en el mejor manejo de la antibioticoterapia utilizada en estos casos. Métodos: se realizó una revisión sobre el estado actual del conocimiento que existe en torno al S. aureus resistente a meticilina y su relación con la infección de piel y partes blandas, así como la antibioticoterapia propuesta en la actualidad. Se presentaron, a manera de ejemplo, cinco casos atendidos en los hospitales Manuel Fajardo, Dr. Luis Díaz Soto y Juan Manuel Márquez. Resultados: las infecciones de piel y partes blandas por este germen son frecuentes en nuestro medio, y afectan a uno y otro sexos y diferentes edades. Las lesiones van desde furunculosis hasta celulitis y abscesos. La identificación del S. aureus resistente a meticilina es posible mediante técnicas convencionales como el uso de discos de cefoxitina. No existe un buen conocimiento acerca del tratamiento antibiótico adecuado de estas infecciones. Los mejores resultados se consiguen con el uso del sulfaprim y las tetraciclinas. Conclusiones: existe un aumento importante del número de casos de infección de piel y partes blandas, tanto comunitarios como hospitalarios, en nuestro medio, provocados por cepas de S. aureus resistente a meticilina. El tratamiento más efectivo incluye el uso de sulfametoxazol-trimetoprim (sulfaprim) o doxiciclina, asociado al drenaje quirúrgico de la lesión(AU)
Objective: to present five cases and to provide updated information on Staphylococcus aureus and its role in skin and soft parts conditions, as well as on the best management to be used in these cases. Methods: areview of the existing state of knowledge on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and related to skin and soft tissues infection as well as its currently-proposed antibiotic treatment. As an example, five cases, treated in Manuel Fajardo Hospital, Dr. Luis Díaz Soto Hospital and Juan Manuel Marquez Hospital, were presented. Results: skin and soft tissues Infections by this organism are common in our environment, and affect both sexes and different ages. They range from furunculosis to cellulitis and abscesses. Identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is possible through conventional techniques such as cefoxitin disks. There is no good knowledge about the appropriate antibiotic treatment on these infections. Best results are achieved with the use of sulfaprim and tetracyclines. Conclusions: there is a significant increase in the number of skin and soft tissue infections, in both community and inpatient cases in our environment, caused by strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The most effective treatment includes the use of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (sulfaprim) or doxycycline, associated with surgical drainage of lesions(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Skin Diseases, Infectious/epidemiology , Skin Diseases, Infectious/pathology , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , DrainageABSTRACT
La leptospirosis es una zoonosis bacteriana causada por especies del género Leptospira que afectam a humanos y animales. Su reservorio lo constituyen los roedores y animales domésticos principalmente, y su transmisión ocurre por la contaminación de suelos y agua con la orina de estos animales. Su distribucción es amplia en países tropicales incluyendo la región del Caribe, América Central y paises de Amércia del Sur. La mayoría de las infecciones son subclínicas o leves, pero puede ocasionar cuadros clínicos graves e incluso fatales. Situaciones particularmente graves de riesgo de infección las constituyen las inundaciones, ya que aumenta el contacto con aguas contaminadas por la orina de los animales vectores. Se realizó un informe ultrarrápido de evaluación de tecnología sobre las profilaxis antibiótica para la leptospirosis en caso de inundación a pedido de las autoridades del Ministerio de Salud de la Provincia de Burenos Aires. Conclusiones: La evidencia analizada no permite determinar si existen beneficios claros en relación al uso de doxiciclina 200 ms semanal en forma profiláctica para evitar la infección por leptospirosis en caso de inundación, luego de la exposición al factor de risgo. En cambio sí se observó aumento de efectos adversos leves (náuseas y vómitos) con el empleo de dicho antibiótico. Se necesitan nuevos ensayos clínicos controlados y aleatorizados de alta calidad metodológica para poder esclarecer la efectividad de la quimioproflaxis de casos de leptospirosis epidémica relacionados a inundaciones. Intervención no recomienda evidencia heterogénea impide extraer conclusiones sobre beneficio clínico en este momento.
Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Floods , Leptospirosis/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , South America , Central America , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Caribbean Region , Natural DisastersABSTRACT
Salmon aquaculture was one of the major growing and exporting industries in Chile. Its development was accompanied by an increasing and excessive use of large amounts of antimicrobials, such as quinolones, tetracyclines and florfenicol. The examination of the sanitary conditions in the industry as part of a more general investigation into the uncontrolled and extensive dissemination of the ISA virus epizootic in 2008, found numerous and wide-ranging shortcomings and limitations in management of preventive fish health. There was a growing industrial use of large amounts of antimicrobials as an attempt at prophylaxis of bacterial infections resulting from widespread unsanitary and unhealthy fish rearing conditions. As might be expected, these attempts were unsuccessful and this heavy antimicrobial use failed to prevent viral and parasitic epizootics. Comparative analysis of the amounts of antimicrobials, especially quinolones, consumed in salmon aquaculture and in human medicine in Chile robustly suggests that the most important selective pressure for antibiotic resistant bacteria in the country will be excessive antibiotic use in this industry. This excessive use will facilitate selection of resistant bacteria and resistance genes in water environments. The commonality of antibiotic resistance genes and the mobilome between environmental aquatic bacteria, fish pathogens and pathogens of terrestrial animals and humans suggests that horizontal gene transfer occurs between the resistome of these apparently independent and isolated bacterial populations. Thus, excessive antibiotic use in the marine environment in aquaculture is not innocuous and can potentially negatively affect therapy of bacterial infections of humans and terrestrial animals.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Fisheries/standards , Public Health , Salmon , Animals , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Chile , HumansABSTRACT
Salmón aquaculture was one ofthe major growing and exporting industries in Chile. Its development was accompanied by an increasing and excessive use oflarge amounts of antimicrobials, such as quinolones, tetracyclines and florfenicol. The examination of the sanitary conditions in the industry as part of a more general investigation into the uncontrolled and extensive dissemination of the ISA virus epizootic in 2008, found numerous and wide-ranging shortcomings and limitations in management of preventive fish health. There was a growing industrial use of large amounts of antimicrobials as an attempt at prophylaxis of bacterial infections resulting from widespread unsanitary and unhealthy fish rearing conditions. As might be expected, these attempts were unsuccessful and this heavy antimicrobial use failed to prevent viral and parasitic epizootics. Comparative analysis of the amounts of antimicrobials, especially quinolones, consumed in salmón aquaculture and in human medicine in Chile robustly suggests that the most important selective pressurefor antibiotic resistant bacteria in the country will be excessive antibiotic use in this industry. This excessive use will facilitate selection of resistant bacteria and resistance genes in water environments. The commonality of antibiotic resistance genes and the mobilome between environmental aquatic bacteria, fishpathogens and pathogens of terrestrial animáis and humans suggests that horizontal gene transfer occurs between the resistome of these apparently independent and isolated bacterial populations. Thus, excessive antibiotic use in the marine environment in aquaculture is not innocuous and can potentially negatively affect therapy of bacterial infections of humans and terrestrial animáis.
Subject(s)
Animals , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Fisheries/standards , Public Health , Salmon , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , ChileABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is a common surgical procedure. In the open cholecystectomy area, antibiotic prophylaxis showed beneficial effects, but it is not known if its benefits and harms are similar in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Some clinical trials suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis may not be necessary in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of antibiotic prophylaxis versus placebo or no prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2010), MEDLINE (1985 to August 2010), EMBASE (1985 to August 2010), SCI-EXPANDED (1985 to August 2010), LILACS (1988 to August 2010) as well as reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing antibiotic prophylaxis versus placebo or no prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Our outcome measures were all-cause mortality, surgical site infections, extra-abdominal infections, adverse events, and quality of life. All outcome measures were confined to within hospitalisation or 30 days after discharge. We summarised the outcome measures by reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI), using both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models. MAIN RESULTS: We included eleven randomised clinical trials with 1664 participants who were mostly at low anaesthetic risk, low frequency of co-morbidities, low risk of conversion to open surgery, and low risk of infectious complications. None of the trials had low risk of bias. We found no statistically significant differences between antibiotic prophylaxis and no prophylaxis in the proportion of surgical site infections (odds ratio (OR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.54) or extra-abdominal infections (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.46). Heterogeneity was not statistically significant. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that there is not sufficient evidence to support or refute the use of antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce surgical site infection and global infections in patients with low risk of anaesthetic complications, co-morbidities, conversion to open surgery, and infectious complications, and undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Larger randomised clinical trials with intention-to-treat analysis and patients also at high risk of conversion to open surgery are needed.
Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
La estructura renal es sensible a la acción de fármacos, especialmente en el túbulo proximal y distal, que están constituidos por células especializadas con gran actividad metabólica dedicada al transporte de solutos. En esta comunicación se describen diversos fármacos que interfieren con el túbulo-intersticio renal en forma aguda o crónica, se explican los mecanismos de daño renal y las formas de evitarlos en el momento del uso clínico de nefrotóxicos. También se hace referencia a aquellos fármacos cuya eliminación es principalmente por filtración glomerular, por lo que su administración debe ajustarse al cálculo de esta variable funcional para evitar toxicidades en órganos y tejidos, incluido el riñón.
Kidney structure and function, especially at the proximal and distal tubule, are sensitive to the toxic action of different substances that are actively transported at those levels. This Communication describes the most common drugs that damage, in an acute or chronic form, the tubuleinterstitial segment of the renal tissue and describe some ways to prevent nephrotoxicity. Also, the paper refers to a second mechanism of damage due to drug accumulation when administered to patients with some degree of renal dysfunction. To avoid renal toxicity the prescription must be adjusted to a calculated renal clearance obtained previous drug administration.