Emicizumab prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A and inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, the treatment of people with hemophilia A and inhibitors (PwHAi) was based on the use of bypassing agents (BPA). However, the advent of emicizumab as prophylaxis has demonstrated promising results. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the bleeding endpoints between PwHAi on BPA and those on emicizumab prophylaxis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review of interventions and meta-analysis conducted at the Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. METHODS: The CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and LILACS databases were searched on February 21, 2023. Two authors conducted the literature search, publication selection, and data extraction. The selected publications evaluated the bleeding endpoints between PwHAi on emicizumab prophylaxis and those on BPA prophylaxis. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the Joanna Briggs Institute criteria. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for treated bleeds. RESULTS: Five publications (56 PwHAi) were selected from the 543 retrieved records. Overall, bleeding endpoints were lower during emicizumab prophylaxis than during BPA prophylaxis. All the publications had at least one risk of bias. The only common parameter for the meta-analysis was the ABR for treated bleeds. During emicizumab prophylaxis, the ABR for treated bleeds was lower than during BPA prophylaxis (standard mean difference: -1.58; 95% confidence interval -2.50, -0.66, P = 0.0008; I2 = 68.4%, P = 0.0031). CONCLUSION: Emicizumab was superior to BPA in bleeding prophylaxis in PwHAi. However, both the small population size and potential risk of bias should be considered when evaluating these results. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42021278726, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278726.

[Pharmacoeconomic analysis of anti-angiogenic drugs for diabetic macular edema]. / Farmakoekonomicheskii analiz primeneniya antiangiogennykh preparatov pri diabeticheskom makulyarnom oteke.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a degenerative disease of the macular area in diabetes mellitus and can lead to vision loss, disability, and significantly reduced quality of life. Faricimab is the only bispecific antibody for DME therapy that targets two pathogenic pathways (Ang-2 and VEGF-A). PURPOSE: This study comparatively evaluates the clinical and economic feasibility of faricimab and other angiogenesis inhibitors in patients with DME. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This article analyzed literature on the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injections (IVI) of ranibizumab 0.5 mg, aflibercept 2 mg, and faricimab 6 mg. A model of medical care was developed for patients with DME receiving anti-angiogenic therapy. Pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed using cost minimization and budget impact analysis (BIA) methods. Modeling time horizon was 2 years. The research was performed from the perspective of the healthcare system of the Russian Federation. RESULTS: The efficacy and safety of faricimab in a personalized regimen (up to one IVI in 16 weeks) are comparable to those of aflibercept and ranibizumab, administered in various regimens. The use of faricimab is associated with the lowest number of IVIs. Over 2 years, the maximum costs of drug therapy were associated with the use of ranibizumab (about 914 thousand rubles), while the minimum costs were associated with the use of faricimab (614 thousand rubles). The reduction in inpatient care costs with faricimab therapy was 36% compared to aflibercept (216 and 201 thousand rubles in inpatient and day hospitals, respectively) and 82% compared to ranibizumab (486 and 451 thousand rubles in inpatient and day hospitals, respectively). BIA demonstrated that the use of faricimab will reduce the economic burden on the healthcare system by 11.3 billion rubles (9.8%) over 2 years. CONCLUSION: The use of faricimab is a cost-effective approach to treatment of adult patients with DME in Russia.

CEA-CD3 bispecific antibody cibisatamab with or without atezolizumab in patients with CEA-positive solid tumours: results of two multi-institutional Phase 1 trials.

Cibisatamab is a bispecific antibody-based construct targeting carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) on tumour cells and CD3 epsilon chain as a T-cell engager. Here we evaluated cibisatamab for advanced CEA-positive solid tumours in two open-label Phase 1 dose-escalation and -expansion studies: as a single agent with or without obinutuzumab in S1 (NCT02324257) and with atezolizumab in S2 (NCT02650713). Primary endpoints were safety, dose finding, and pharmacokinetics in S1; safety and dose finding in S2. Secondary endpoints were anti-tumour activity (including overall response rate, ORR) and pharmacodynamics in S1; anti-tumour activity, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in S2. S1 and S2 enrolled a total of 149 and 228 patients, respectively. Grade ≥3 cibisatamab-related adverse events occurred in 36% of S1 and 49% of S2 patients. The ORR was 4% in S1 and 7% in S2. In S2, patients with microsatellite stable colorectal carcinoma (MSS-CRC) given flat doses of cibisatamab and atezolizumab demonstrated an ORR of 14%. In S1 and S2, 40% and 52% of patients, respectively, developed persistent anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). ADA appearance could be mitigated by obinutuzumab-pretreatment, with 8% of patients having persistent ADAs. Overall, cibisatamab warrants further exploration in immunotherapy combination strategies for MSS-CRC.

Targeting GPRC5D in multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) continues to improve. Recent progress in therapies, using immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, has greatly improved patients' outcomes. Despite these advancements, relapses still happen often, and patients can become resistant to the usual treatments. Newer treatments, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), have resulted in excellent outcomes in patients with limited treatment options. G protein - coupled receptor, class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) is considered a very promising target with early results from clinical trials showing high response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. AREAS COVERED: This review covers the efficacy and safety of CAR-T and BsAbs targeting GPRC5D in MM, focusing on talquetamab - the inaugural FDA-approved BsAb targeting GPRC5D. Talquetamab has exhibited promising response rates alongside a distinctive side effect profile. Additionally, ongoing trials examining talquetamab in combination with agents like daratumumab and teclistamab are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: We offer insights into the potential utilization of various GPRC5D-based therapies in the treatment paradigm for MM, either independently or in combination with established therapies.

[Resolution of the Expert council on surgical care for hemophilia A patients on emicizumab use]. / Rezolyutsiya Soveta ekspertov po voprosam okazaniya khirurgicheskoi pomoshchi patsientam s gemofiliei A na fone primeneniya emitsizumaba.

Resolution of the Expert council on surgical care for hemophilia A patients on emicizumab use.

Impact of Treatment Modality and Route of Administration on Cytokine Release Syndrome in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis.

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting immunotherapies (e.g., chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs)) have achieved remarkable clinical responses in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Their use is accompanied by exaggerated immune responses related to T-cell activation and cytokine elevations leading to cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in some patients, which can be potentially life-threatening. However, systematic evaluation of the risk of CRS with BCMA-targeting BsAb and CAR-T therapies, and comparisons across different routes of BsAb administration (intravenous (i.v.) vs. subcutaneous (s.c.)) have not previously been conducted. This study utilized a meta-analysis approach to compare the CRS profile in BCMA-targeting CAR-T vs. BsAb immunotherapies administered either i.v. or s.c. in patients with RRMM. A total of 36 studies including 1,560 patients with RRMM treated with BCMA-targeting CAR-T and BsAb therapies were included in the analysis. The current analysis suggests that compared with BsAbs, CAR-T therapies were associated with higher CRS incidences (88% vs. 59%), higher rates of grade ≥ 3 CRS (7% vs. 2%), longer CRS duration (5 vs. 2 days), and more prevalent tocilizumab use (44% vs. 25%). The proportion of CRS grade ≥ 3 may also be lower (0% vs. 4%) for BsAb therapies administered via the s.c. (3 studies, n = 311) vs. i.v. (5 studies, n = 338) route. This meta-analysis suggests that different types of BCMA-targeting immunotherapies and administration routes could result in a range of CRS incidence and severity that should be considered while evaluating the benefit-risk profiles of these therapies.

Single dual-specific anti-PD-L1/TGF-ß antibody synergizes with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a preclinical experimental study.

AIMS: Chemotherapy resistance is an important cause of neoadjuvant therapy failure in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). BiTP (anti-PD-L1/TGF-ß bispecific antibody) is a single antibody that can simultaneously and dually target transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). We attempted in this study to investigate the efficacy of BiTP in combination with first-line chemotherapy in PDAC. METHODS: Preclinical assessments of BiTP plus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel were completed through a resectable KPC mouse model (C57BL/6J). Spectral flow cytometry, tissue section staining, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, Counting Kit-8, transwell, and Western blot assays were used to investigate the synergistic effects. RESULTS: BiTP combinatorial chemotherapy in neoadjuvant settings significantly downstaged PDAC tumors, enhanced survival, and had a higher resectability for mice with PDAC. BiTP was high affinity binding to targets and reverse chemotherapy resistance of PDAC cells. The combination overcame immune evasion through reprogramming tumor microenvironment via increasing penetration and function of T cells, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells and decreasing the function of immunosuppression-related cells as regulatory T cells, M2 macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the BiTP combinatorial chemotherapy is a promising neoadjuvant therapy for PDAC.

Impact of elranatamab on quality of life: Patient-reported outcomes from MagnetisMM-3.

The physical and emotional burden of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) has been strongly correlated with declining health-related quality of life (QOL) in the patients it affects. This analysis evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-naive (n = 123) and -exposed (n = 64) patients with RRMM enrolled in the MagnetisMM-3 study (NCT04649359) and treated with the humanized, bispecific BCMA-CD3 antibody elranatamab. Patients received two step-up doses of elranatamab (12 mg on day 1, 32 mg on day 4) before starting the full dose of 76 mg on day 8 (each cycle = 28 days). Global health status, functioning and symptom data were collected electronically using validated and myeloma-specific questionnaires. Improvements in PROs occurred early, with marked reductions in pain and disease symptoms and notable improvements in patients' outlook for their future health. Additionally, 40.2% of BCMA-naive and 52.6% of BCMA-exposed patients perceived their disease as 'a little better' or 'much better' by Cycle 1, Day 15. The results from this analysis demonstrated that elranatamab maintained or improved symptomology and general health status, regardless of prior BCMA-directed therapy. Thus, in addition to its clinical benefits, elranatamab therapy may sustain or improve QOL in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM.

Blinatumomab Added to Chemotherapy in Infant Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: KMT2A-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in infants is an aggressive disease with 3-year event-free survival below 40%. Most relapses occur during treatment, with two thirds occurring within 1 year and 90% within 2 years after diagnosis. Outcomes have not improved in recent decades despite intensification of chemotherapy. METHODS: We studied the safety and efficacy of blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager molecule targeting CD19, in infants with KMT2A-rearranged ALL. Thirty patients younger than 1 year of age with newly diagnosed KMT2A-rearranged ALL were given the chemotherapy used in the Interfant-06 trial with the addition of one postinduction course of blinatumomab (15 µg per square meter of body-surface area per day; 28-day continuous infusion). The primary end point was clinically relevant toxic effects, defined as any toxic effect that was possibly or definitely attributable to blinatumomab and resulted in permanent discontinuation of blinatumomab or death. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was measured by polymerase chain reaction. Data on adverse events were collected. Outcome data were compared with historical control data from the Interfant-06 trial. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 26.3 months (range, 3.9 to 48.2). All 30 patients received the full course of blinatumomab. No toxic effects meeting the definition of the primary end point occurred. Ten serious adverse events were reported (fever [4 events], infection [4], hypertension [1], and vomiting [1]). The toxic-effects profile was consistent with that reported in older patients. A total of 28 patients (93%) either were MRD-negative (16 patients) or had low levels of MRD (<5×10-4 [i.e., <5 leukemic cells per 10,000 normal cells], 12 patients) after the blinatumomab infusion. All the patients who continued chemotherapy became MRD-negative during further treatment. Two-year disease-free survival was 81.6% in our study (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.8 to 92.0), as compared with 49.4% (95% CI, 42.5 to 56.0) in the Interfant-06 trial; the corresponding values for overall survival were 93.3% (95% CI, 75.9 to 98.3) and 65.8% (95% CI, 58.9 to 71.8). CONCLUSIONS: Blinatumomab added to Interfant-06 chemotherapy appeared to be safe and had a high level of efficacy in infants with newly diagnosed KMT2A-rearranged ALL as compared with historical controls from the Interfant-06 trial. (Funded by the Princess Máxima Center Foundation and others; EudraCT number, 2016-004674-17.).

Talquetamab, a T-Cell-Redirecting GPRC5D Bispecific Antibody for Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: G protein-coupled receptor, family C, group 5, member D (GPRC5D) is an orphan receptor expressed in malignant plasma cells. Talquetamab, a bispecific antibody against CD3 and GPRC5D, redirects T cells to mediate killing of GPRC5D-expressing myeloma cells. METHODS: In a phase 1 study, we evaluated talquetamab administered intravenously weekly or every other week (in doses from 0.5 to 180 µg per kilogram of body weight) or subcutaneously weekly, every other week, or monthly (5 to 1600 µg per kilogram) in patients who had heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma that had progressed with established therapies (a median of six previous lines of therapy) or who could not receive these therapies without unacceptable side effects. The primary end points - the frequency and type of dose-limiting toxic effects (study part 1 only), adverse events, and laboratory abnormalities - were assessed in order to select the recommended doses for a phase 2 study. RESULTS: At the data-cutoff date, 232 patients had received talquetamab (102 intravenously and 130 subcutaneously). At the two subcutaneous doses recommended for a phase 2 study (405 µg per kilogram weekly [30 patients] and 800 µg per kilogram every other week [44 patients]), common adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (in 77% and 80% of the patients, respectively), skin-related events (in 67% and 70%), and dysgeusia (in 63% and 57%); all but one cytokine release syndrome event were of grade 1 or 2. One dose-limiting toxic effect of grade 3 rash was reported in a patient who had received talquetamab at the 800-µg dose level. At median follow-ups of 11.7 months (in patients who had received talquetamab at the 405-µg dose level) and 4.2 months (in those who had received it at the 800-µg dose level), the percentages of patients with a response were 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51 to 85) and 64% (95% CI, 48 to 78), respectively. The median duration of response was 10.2 months and 7.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cytokine release syndrome, skin-related events, and dysgeusia were common with talquetamab treatment but were primarily low-grade. Talquetamab induced a substantial response among patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MonumenTAL-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03399799.).

A phase two study of high dose blinatumomab in Richter's syndrome.

Richter's Syndrome (RS) is an aggressive transformation of CLL, usually clonally-related diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), characterized by frequent TP53 mutations, intrinsic chemoresistance and poor survival. TP53-independent treatments are needed. We conducted a single center, phase 2, investigator-initiated study of high dose blinatumomab (maximum 112 mcg/d after initial, weekly dose escalation), NCT03121534, given for an 8-week induction and 4-week consolidation cycle. Responses were assessed by Lugano 2014 criteria. Serial multi-parameter flow cytometry from blood was performed to identify patient-specific biomarkers for response. Nine patients were treated. Patients had received a median of 4 and 2 prior therapies for CLL and RS, respectively. Five of 9 had del(17p) and 100% had complex karyotype. Four patients had reduction in nodal disease, including one durable complete response lasting >1 y. Treatment was well tolerated, with no grade >3 cytokine release syndrome and 1 case of grade 3, reversible neurotoxicity. Immunophenotyping demonstrated the majority of patients expressed multiple immune checkpoints, especially PD1, TIM3 and TIGIT. The patient who achieved CR had the lowest levels of immune checkpoint expression. Simultaneous targeting with immune checkpoint blockade, especially PD1 inhibition, which has already demonstrated single-agent efficacy in RS, could achieve synergistic killing and enhance outcomes.

Eficacia y seguridad de uso pediátrico de blinatumomab, para el tratamiento de leucemia linfoblástica aguda de precursores de células B con cromosoma philadelphia negativo en recidiva o refractaria / Efficacy and safety of pediatric use of blinatumomab, for the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia with Philadelphia chromosome negative

ANTECEDENTES: El presente dictamen ha sido elaborado en el marco de la metodología ad hoc para evaluar solicitudes de tecnologías sanitarias, la cual fue aprobada mediante la Resolución N° 111-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021 del Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI). Bajo dicho contexto, el presente documento expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad del uso pediátrico de blinatumomab, para el tratamiento de leucemia linfoblástica aguda de precursores de células B con cromosoma Philadelphia negativo en recidiva o refractaria. ASPECTOS GENERALES: La leucemia linfoblástica aguda (LLA) es la neoplasia hematológica más frecuente de la etapa infantil, potencialmente curable hasta en un 90 % de los casos (Hunger y Mullighan 2015). En Perú, se ha estimado una incidencia esperada de 270 a 360 casos nuevos de LLA por año en niños menores de 14 años (Castro-Arechaga et al. 2018). La LLA se clasifica, según la Organización Mundial de la Salud, en LLA de células B, LLA de células T y leucemia de células de Burkitt, tomando en cuenta la morfología y perfil citogenético de los blastos leucémicos (Terwilliger y Abdul-Hay 2017). La LLA de células B es la forma más común de LLA (Inaba y Mullighan 2020). El cromosoma Philadelphia aparece por una translocación recíproca entre los cromosomas 9 y 22 t (9;22) (q34; q11.2), llegando a estar presente en el 3 % al 5 % de los niños con leucemia linfoblástica aguda (Kaczmarska et al. 2021). Además, se ha observado que en los pacientes con LLA que no presentan el cromosoma Philadelphia (cromosoma Philadelphia negativo o Ph-) presentan una tasa de remisión completa de la enfermedad hasta en un 90 % de los casos con una sobrevida global a los 5 años de 43 % (Huguet et al. 2009). METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad del uso pediátrico de blinatumomab, para el tratamiento de leucemia linfoblástica aguda de precursores de células B con cromosoma Philadelphia negativo en recidiva o refractaria. Esta búsqueda se realizó utilizando los buscadores: National Library of Medicine (PubMed-MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, LILACS y Web of Science. Adicionalmente, se realizó una búsqueda manual del listado de referencias bibliográficas de los estudios seleccionados a fin de identificar otros estudios que pudieran ser útiles para la presente evaluación. Por otro lado, se amplió la búsqueda revisando la evidencia generada por grupos internacionales que realizan revisiones sistemáticas (RS), evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC), tales como The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) y The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Esta búsqueda se completó revisando publicaciones de grupos dedicados a la educación, investigación y mejora de la práctica clínica oncológica y hematológica dentro de América y Europa, como The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), y The British Society for Haematology (BSH). Finalmente, se hizo una búsqueda adicional en la página web del registro de ensayos clínicos administrado por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina de los Estados Unidos (https://clinicaltrials.gov/) e International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) (https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/), para poder identificar ensayos clínicos en curso o cuyos resultados no hayan sido publicados para, de este modo, disminuir el riesgo de sesgo de publicación. Las estrategias de la búsqueda para identificar la evidencia de ECA se encuentran en las Tabla A, B, C y D del Material Suplementario. La búsqueda de literatura considero GPC, priorizando aquellas que elaboraran recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia; considerando además aquellas guías de referencia para los servicios de oncología y hematología de la institución; ETS; revisiones sistemáticas con metaanálisis de ECA basado en comparaciones directas; y ECA que abordaran la pregunta PICO del presente dictamen. Al no encontrar ECA que ayudara a responder de manera específica la PICO de interés, se pasó a revisar los ensayos pivotales de aprobación de uso del fármaco blinatumomab en la población de interés. Se incluyeron las publicaciones en inglés y español. Se excluyeron estúdios observacionales, series de casos, reportes de casos, cartas al editor, los comentarios, las editoriales, suplementos y los resúmenes de congresos. RESULTADOS: GPC: guía de práctica clínica; ETS: evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias; RS: revisión sistemática; ECA: ensayo clínico aleatorizado; LiLACS: Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud; BRISA: Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas. Flujograma adaptado de: Page MJ, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. De los 7 artículos que se recuperaron para ser leídos a texto completo (Yu, Wang, y Huang 2019; von Stackelberg et al. 2016; Queudeville y Ebinger 2021; Ponvilawan et al. 2021; Halford et al. 2021; Brown et al. 2021; Locatelli et al. 2021), ninguno aportó información específica para la pregunta PICO. En la búsqueda manual, se encontraron dos guías de práctica clínica: una de NCCN (NCCN 2022) y otra del Comité Canadiense de Revisión de Medicamentos Oncológicos (Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review), comité asesor adscrito a CADTH (pCODR-CADTH 2017). Además, se decidió incluir un ensayo de fase 1/fase II (von Stackelberg et al. 2016), al no haber ECA de fase III que respondieran de manera directa la PICO de interés. Este ensayo es el estudio pivotal con el que FDA dio autorización a blinatumomab para el tratamiento de pacientes pediátricos con LLA de precursores de células B en recaída o refractarios (FDA 2018). Asimismo, se incluyó el estudio sin grupo de comparación RIALTO (Locatelli et al. 2022) por ser un ensayo clínico que proporciona información adicional sobre la seguridad de blinatumomab en la población pediátrica. CONCLUSIÓN: Por todo lo expuesto, el IETSI no aprueba el uso pediátrico de blinatumomab, para el tratamiento de leucemia linfoblástica aguda de precursores de células B con cromosoma Philadelphia negativo en recidiva o refractaria.

Determination of starting dose of the T cell-redirecting bispecific antibody ERY974 targeting glypican-3 in first-in-human clinical trial.

Currently, ERY974, a humanized IgG4 bispecific T cell-redirecting antibody recognizing glypican-3 and CD3, is in phase I clinical trials. After a first-in-human clinical trial of an anti-CD28 agonist monoclonal antibody resulting in severe life-threatening adverse events, the minimal anticipated biological effect level approach has been considered for determining the first-in-human dose of high-risk drugs. Accordingly, we aimed to determine the first-in-human dose of ERY974 using both the minimal anticipated biological effect level and no observed adverse effect level approaches. In the former, we used the 10% effective concentration value from a cytotoxicity assay using the huH-1 cell line with the highest sensitivity to ERY974 to calculate the first-in-human dose of 4.9 ng/kg, at which maximum drug concentration after 4 h of intravenous ERY974 infusion was equal to the 10% effective concentration value. To determine the no observed adverse effect level, we conducted a single-dose study in cynomolgus monkeys that were intravenously infused with ERY974 (0.1, 1, and 10 µg/kg). The lowest dose of 0.1 µg/kg was determined as the no observed adverse effect level, and the first-in-human dose of 3.2 ng/kg was calculated, considering body surface area and species difference. For the phase I clinical trial, we selected 3.0 ng/kg as a starting dose, which was lower than the first-in-human dose calculated from both the no observed adverse effect level and minimal anticipated biological effect level. Combining these two methods to determine the first-in-human dose of strong immune modulators such as T cell-redirecting antibodies would be a suitable approach from safety and efficacy perspectives.Clinical trial registration: JapicCTI-194805/NCT05022927.

Teclistamab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Teclistamab is a T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibody that targets both CD3 expressed on the surface of T cells and B-cell maturation antigen expressed on the surface of myeloma cells. In the phase 1 dose-defining portion of the study, teclistamab showed promising efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: In this phase 1-2 study, we enrolled patients who had relapsed or refractory myeloma after at least three therapy lines, including triple-class exposure to an immunomodulatory drug, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 antibody. Patients received a weekly subcutaneous injection of teclistamab (at a dose of 1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight) after receiving step-up doses of 0.06 mg and 0.3 mg per kilogram. The primary end point was the overall response (partial response or better). RESULTS: Among 165 patients who received teclistamab, 77.6% had triple-class refractory disease (median, five previous therapy lines). With a median follow-up of 14.1 months, the overall response rate was 63.0%, with 65 patients (39.4%) having a complete response or better. A total of 44 patients (26.7%) were found to have no minimal residual disease (MRD); the MRD-negativity rate among the patients with a complete response or better was 46%. The median duration of response was 18.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.9 to not estimable). The median duration of progression-free survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 17.1). Common adverse events included cytokine release syndrome (in 72.1% of the patients; grade 3, 0.6%; no grade 4), neutropenia (in 70.9%; grade 3 or 4, 64.2%), anemia (in 52.1%; grade 3 or 4, 37.0%), and thrombocytopenia (in 40.0%; grade 3 or 4, 21.2%). Infections were frequent (in 76.4%; grade 3 or 4, 44.8%). Neurotoxic events occurred in 24 patients (14.5%), including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome in 5 patients (3.0%; all grade 1 or 2). CONCLUSIONS: Teclistamab resulted in a high rate of deep and durable response in patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cytopenias and infections were common; toxic effects that were consistent with T-cell redirection were mostly grade 1 or 2. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MajesTEC-1 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03145181 and NCT04557098.).

Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (TENAYA and LUCERNE): two randomised, double-masked, phase 3, non-inferiority trials.

BACKGROUND: Faricimab is a bispecific antibody that acts through dual inhibition of both angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor A. We report primary results of two phase 3 trials evaluating intravitreal faricimab with extension up to every 16 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: TENAYA and LUCERNE were randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority trials across 271 sites worldwide. Treatment-naive patients with nAMD aged 50 years or older were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravitreal faricimab 6·0 mg up to every 16 weeks, based on protocol-defined disease activity assessments at weeks 20 and 24, or aflibercept 2·0 mg every 8 weeks. Randomisation was performed through an interactive voice or web-based response system using a stratified permuted block randomisation method. Patients, investigators, those assessing outcomes, and the funder were masked to group assignments. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline averaged over weeks 40, 44, and 48 (prespecified non-inferiority margin of four letters), in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (TENAYA NCT03823287 and LUCERNE NCT03823300). FINDINGS: Across the two trials, 1329 patients were randomly assigned between Feb 19 and Nov 19, 2019 (TENAYA n=334 faricimab and n=337 aflibercept), and between March 11 and Nov 1, 2019 (LUCERNE n=331 faricimab and n=327 aflibercept). BCVA change from baseline with faricimab was non-inferior to aflibercept in both TENAYA (adjusted mean change 5·8 letters [95% CI 4·6 to 7·1] and 5·1 letters [3·9 to 6·4]; treatment difference 0·7 letters [-1·1 to 2·5]) and LUCERNE (6·6 letters [5·3 to 7·8] and 6·6 letters [5·3 to 7·8]; treatment difference 0·0 letters [-1·7 to 1·8]). Rates of ocular adverse events were comparable between faricimab and aflibercept (TENAYA n=121 [36·3%] vs n=128 [38·1%], and LUCERNE n=133 [40·2%] vs n=118 [36·2%]). INTERPRETATION: Visual benefits with faricimab given at up to 16-week intervals demonstrates its potential to meaningfully extend the time between treatments with sustained efficacy, thereby reducing treatment burden in patients with nAMD. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab with extended dosing up to every 16 weeks in patients with diabetic macular oedema (YOSEMITE and RHINE): two randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: To reduce treatment burden and optimise patient outcomes in diabetic macular oedema, we present 1-year results from two phase 3 trials of faricimab, a novel angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A bispecific antibody. METHODS: YOSEMITE and RHINE were randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority trials across 353 sites worldwide. Adults with vision loss due to centre-involving diabetic macular oedema were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to intravitreal faricimab 6·0 mg every 8 weeks, faricimab 6·0 mg per personalised treatment interval (PTI), or aflibercept 2·0 mg every 8 weeks up to week 100. PTI dosing intervals were extended, maintained, or reduced (every 4 weeks up to every 16 weeks) based on disease activity at active dosing visits. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year, averaged over weeks 48, 52, and 56. Efficacy analyses included the intention-to-treat population (non-inferiority margin 4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters); safety analyses included patients with at least one dose of study treatment. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (YOSEMITE NCT03622580 and RHINE NCT03622593). FINDINGS: 3247 patients were screened for eligibility in YOSEMITE (n=1532) and RHINE (n=1715). After exclusions, 940 patients were enrolled into YOSEMITE between Sept 5, 2018, and Sept 19, 2019, and 951 patients were enrolled into RHINE between Oct 9, 2018, and Sept 20, 2019. These 1891 patients were randomly assigned to faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE n=315, RHINE n=317), faricimab PTI (n=313, n=319), or aflibercept every 8 weeks (n=312, n=315). Non-inferiority for the primary endpoint was achieved with faricimab every 8 weeks (adjusted mean vs aflibercept every 8 weeks in YOSEMITE 10·7 ETDRS letters [97·52% CI 9·4 to 12·0] vs 10·9 ETDRS letters [9·6 to 12·2], difference -0·2 ETDRS letters [-2·0 to 1·6]; RHINE 11·8 ETDRS letters [10·6 to 13·0] vs 10·3 ETDRS letters [9·1 to 11·4] letters, difference 1·5 ETDRS letters [-0·1 to 3·2]) and faricimab PTI (YOSEMITE 11·6 ETDRS letters [10·3 to 12·9], difference 0·7 ETDRS letters [-1·1 to 2·5]; RHINE 10·8 ETDRS letters [9·6 to 11·9], difference 0·5 ETDRS letters [-1·1 to 2·1]). Incidence of ocular adverse events was comparable between faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE n=98 [31%], RHINE n=137 [43%]), faricimab PTI (n=106 [34%], n=119 [37%]), and aflibercept every 8 weeks (n=102 [33%], n=113 [36%]). INTERPRETATION: Robust vision gains and anatomical improvements with faricimab were achieved with adjustable dosing up to every 16 weeks, demonstrating the potential for faricimab to extend the durability of treatment for patients with diabetic macular oedema. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

A Model-Based Framework to Inform the Dose Selection and Study Design of Emicizumab for Pediatric Patients With Hemophilia A.

Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody mimicking the cofactor function of activated coagulation factor VIII to prevent bleeds in patients with hemophilia A. The dose selection for the first-in-child phase III study of emicizumab was addressed by pediatric pharmacokinetic prediction using an adult/adolescent population pharmacokinetic model developed in phase I-I/II studies. The model was modified to incorporate functions describing the age-dependent increase in body weight (BW) with or without clearance maturation to account for the differences in emicizumab pharmacokinetics between adults/adolescents and children. A minimal dose anticipated to achieve in children the same target efficacious exposure as for adults/adolescents was identified when considering BW and clearance maturation. It was the same BW-based dose as for adults/adolescents and was selected for the starting dose for the pediatric study. Whether considering clearance maturation or not in addition to BW led to uncertainty in the pediatric pharmacokinetic prediction and dose selection, which informed implementation of a dose-adapting scheme in the study design. Exposure matching to adults/adolescents was ultimately achieved in children with the starting dose, indicating that consideration of clearance maturation in addition to BW provided adequate pediatric pharmacokinetic predictions for emicizumab. This pharmacokinetic finding in conjunction with exposure-response information served as a basis for the efficacy demonstrated in children, avoiding a time-consuming process for exploring an optimal pediatric dose of emicizumab. This experience indicates that a model-based framework helped optimize the pediatric dose selection and study design, thereby streamlining the development process with extrapolation, of emicizumab for children.

Response to blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamicin for isolated extramedullary relapse of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a case study.

Isolated extramedullary relapse (EMR) without bone marrow relapse (BMR) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a rare condition in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and the role of immunotherapeutic agents for these patients remains unclear. We analyzed treatment outcomes of blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) as first- or second-line salvage therapy in nine patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor ALL presenting with isolated EMR after previous allo-HCT. In seven patients receiving blinatumomab as first-line salvage therapy, 4 (57.1%) achieved complete remission (CR). Among the three patients without remission after blinatumomab, two switched to INO and subsequently showed responses {one CR and one partial response [PR]}, and one switched to multiagent chemotherapy that led to CR. In the two patients receiving first-line salvage therapy with INO, one showed PR and the other achieved CR. Overall, 6 (66.7%) of nine patients achieved CR, and five of them proceeded to allo-HCT in CR. The median overall survival after relapse was 27.8 months. In conclusion, both blinatumomab and INO showed good response rates and a safe bridging role to second allo-HCT in patients with isolated EMR. However, clinical differences between isolated EMR and EMR with BMR remain to be elucidated.