Evinacumab and Cardiovascular Outcome in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) remain at very high cardiovascular risk despite the best standard of care lipid-lowering treatment. The addition of evinacumab, an angiopoietin-like protein 3 monoclonal antibody, more than halves low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in short-term studies. This study evaluated whether the evinacumab response was durable in the long term and improved cardiovascular outcome. METHODS: The OLE ELIPSE HoFH (Open-Label Extension to Evinacumab Lipid Studies in Patients With HoFH) study included newly diagnosed patients and those completing the ELIPSE HoFH trial, on stable lipid-lowering therapy including lipoprotein apheresis but not lomitapide. All patients received evinacumab (15 mg/kg intravenously) every 4 weeks, with no change in concomitant lipid-lowering treatment during the first 6 months. The primary efficacy end points were the mean absolute and percentage changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline to 6 months. A key secondary end point was cardiovascular event-free survival, which was compared with a control HoFH cohort not treated with evinacumab or lomitapide and matched for age, sex, and lipoprotein apheresis, derived from French Registry of Familial hypercholesterolemia. RESULTS: Twelve patients, 5 women and 7 men (12-57 years), were enrolled in 3 centers in France. At 6 months, the mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction with evinacumab was 3.7 mmol/L or 56% (from 6.5 mmol/L at baseline to 2.8 mmol/L; P<0.0001) and was sustained over the median 3.5-year follow-up. No patients on evinacumab experienced cardiovascular events versus 13 events for 5/21 (24%) over 4 years in the control cohort (likelihood P=0.0267). CONCLUSIONS: Real-life, long-term evinacumab adjunctive to lipid-lowering therapy including lipoprotein apheresis led to sustained low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering and improved cardiovascular event-free survival of patients with HoFH.

Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Low/Moderate-Intensity Statin plus Ezetimibe Combination Therapy vs. High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

AIM: Statin therapy is considered the gold standard for treating hypercholesterolemia. This updated meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a low/moderate-intensity statin in combination with ezetimibe compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). METHODS: A systematic search of two databases (PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL) was conducted from inception to January 2023 and a total of 21 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified and included in the analysis. Data were pooled using Hedges's g and a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model to derive standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cis). The primary outcome studied was the effect of these treatments on lipid parameters and safety events. RESULTS: The results revealed that combination therapy was more effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (SMD= - 0.41; CI - 0.63 to - 0.19; P = 0.0002). There was no significant change in the levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), Apo A1, or Apo B. The safety of these treatments was assessed by the following markers alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatine phosphokinase (CK), and a significant difference was only observed in CK (SMD: - 0.81; CI - 1.52 to - 0.10; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of low/moderate-intensity statin combination therapy significantly reduced LDL-C levels compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy, making it preferable for patients with related risks. However, further trials are encouraged to evaluate potential adverse effects associated with combined therapy.

Pragmatic Trial of Messaging to Providers About Treatment of Hyperlipidemia (PROMPT-LIPID): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is underutilized for very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. PROMPT-LIPID (PRagmatic Trial of Messaging to Providers about Treatment of HyperLIPIDemia) sought to determine whether electronic health record (EHR) alerts improve 90-day LLT intensification in patients with very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. METHODS: PROMPT-LIPID was a pragmatic trial in which cardiovascular and internal medicine clinicians within Yale New Haven Health (New Haven, CT) were cluster-randomized to receive an EHR alert with individualized LLT recommendations or no alert for outpatients with very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol), ≥70 mg/dL. The primary outcome was 90-day LLT intensification (change to high-intensity statin and addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9i [proprotein subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors]). Secondary outcomes included LDL-C level, proportion of patients with LDL-C of <70 or < 55 mg/dL, rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, ED visit incidence, and 6-month mortality. Results were analyzed using logistic and linear regression clustered at the provider level. RESULTS: The no-alert group included 47 clinicians and 1370 patients (median age, 71 years; 50.1% female, median LDL-C, 93 mg/dL); the alert group included 49 clinicians and 1130 patients (median age, 72 years; 47% female, median LDL-C 91, mg/dL). The primary outcome was observed in 14.1% of patients in the alert group as compared with 10.4% in the no-alert group. There were no differences in any secondary outcomes at 6 months. Among 542 patients whose clinicians (n=46) did not dismiss the EHR alert recommendations, LLT intensification was significantly greater (21.2% versus 10.4%, odds ratio, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.48-3.66]). CONCLUSIONS: With a real-time, targeted, individualized EHR alert as compared with usual care, the proportion of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with LLT intensification was numerically higher but not statistically significant. Among clinicians who did not dismiss the alert, there was a > 2-fold increase in LLT intensification. EHR alerts, coupled with strategies to reduce clinician dismissal, may help address persistent gaps in LDL-C management. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04394715, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04394715.

Clinical Benefit of Fixed-Dose Combination of Amlodipine and Potent Atorvastatin in Patients With Concomitant Hypertension and Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are important risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and treatment with fixed-dose combination (FDC) regimens is recommended by current guidelines. However, the clinical outcomes of different FDC dosages remain unknown. This study aimed to examine the clinical outcomes of FDC regimens and the free combination of amlodipine and atorvastatin at different dosages. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with concurrent hypertension and hypercholesterolemia treated daily with an FDC of 5 mg amlodipine and 10 mg atorvastatin (5/10 fixed group), and FDC of 5 mg amlodipine and 20 mg atorvastatin (5/20 fixed group), or free combination of 5 mg amlodipine and 20 mg atorvastatin (5/20 free group) were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The primary outcome was the composite cardiovascular outcomes, including cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary intervention. A total of 9095 patients were eligible for inclusion. The incidence of primary outcome per 1000 person-years was 16.6 in the 5/10 fixed group, 12.6 in the 5/20 fixed group, and 16.5 in the 5/20 free group (5/20 fixed versus 5/20 free: hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.64-0.91]; 5/20 fixed versus 5/10 fixed: HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.63-0.90]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with concomitant hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, treatment with an FDC of amlodipine and high-dose atorvastatin led to a lower risk of a composite of cardiovascular outcomes than treatment with the free combination or a similar FDC with a lower dose of atorvastatin.

Evolocumab Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Pooled Data From Three Open-Label Studies.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) have an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and difficulty meeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated pooled safety and efficacy data from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH treated with the PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) monoclonal antibody inhibitor evolocumab. METHODS: Patients with HoFH aged 10 to 17 years received treatment with open-label evolocumab 420 mg subcutaneously monthly or biweekly in the TAUSSIG, RAMAN, or HAUSER-OLE clinical studies. All patients received background statins with or without ezetimibe. Study duration ranged from 12 to 260 weeks. The primary end point was treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient-years. Efficacy end points were changes from baseline to week 12 in lipids and PCSK9. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients in the pooled analysis, 69.2% were males, median age was 13.0 years, and 79.5% (31/39) had genotyped HoFH with LDLR pathogenic variants. Overall, median exposure to evolocumab was 18.2 (Q1, Q3: 3.0, 18.5) months. Treatment-emergent adverse events with an exposure-adjusted patient incidence rate of ≥5% were upper respiratory tract infection (6.6%), influenza (5.2%), and acne (5.0%) per 100 patient-years. Exposure-adjusted patient incidence of serious treatment-emergent adverse events was 13.3% per 100 patient-years. Excluding 4 patients receiving lipoprotein apheresis, week 12 median percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was -2.9% (Q1, Q3: -21.7, 1.5); however, 42.9% (15/35) of patients achieved ≥15% reduction in LDL-C from baseline. Residual LDLR (LDL receptor) activity was not associated with a reduction in LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled data analysis from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH, evolocumab was well tolerated, with no new safety signals reported. These safety findings are consistent with findings from previous studies of evolocumab. Patients showed marked variability in LDL-C reduction. Results from this pooled analysis support guidelines suggesting a trial of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy regardless of estimated residual LDLR function. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01624142, NCT03403374, and NCT02624869.

Current and emerging monoclonal antibodies for treating familial hypercholesterolemia in children.

INTRODUCTION: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is a common genetic disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the LDL-C metabolism. Lifelong exposure to elevated LDL-C levels leads to a high risk of premature cardiovascular disease. To reduce that risk, children with HeFH should be identified and treated with lipid-lowering therapy. The cornerstone consists of statins and ezetimibe, but not in all patients this lowers the LDL-C levels to treatment targets. For these patients, more intensive lipid-lowering therapy is needed. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we provide an overview of the monoclonal antibodies which are currently available or being tested for treating HeFH in childhood. EXPERT OPINION: Monoclonal antibodies that inhibit PCSK9 are first in line lipid-lowering treatment options if oral statin and ezetimibe therapy are insufficient, due to intolerance or very high baseline LDL-C levels. Both evolocumab and alirocumab have been shown to be safe and effective in children with HeFH. For children, evolocumab has been registered from the age of 10 years old and alirocumab from the age of 8 years old. The costs of these new agents are much higher than oral therapy, which makes it important to only use them in a selected patient population.

An update on inclisiran for the treatment of elevated LDL cholesterol.

INTRODUCTION: The burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) persists globally, demanding innovative therapeutic strategies. This manuscript provides an expert opinion on the significance of managing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in ASCVD prevention and introduces inclisiran, a novel small interfering RNA targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). AREAS COVERED: This work delves into the intricate mechanism of inclisiran, highlighting its unique approach of hepatic intracellular PCSK9 inhibition, its precision and low off-target effects risk. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic distinctions from PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies are explored, underlining inclisiran's efficiency, extended duration, and clearance. Clinical trials, including pivotal phase-III placebo-controlled studies (ORION-9, -10, -11), the open-label ORION-3 and pooled safety analysis of these trails including the open-label phase of ORION-8, as well as real-word data are discussed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of inclisiran's efficacy and safety. EXPERT OPINION: Inclisiran stands as a first-in-class breakthrough in lipid-lowering therapies, showing potential in alleviating the global burden of ASCVD and is supported by multiple global regulatory approvals. To optimize inclisiran's utilization and comprehend its long-term effects, future directions include pediatric studies, cardiovascular outcome trials, and extended-duration investigations. Overall, inclisiran emerges as a precise and effective therapeutic option, offering significant promise for preserving cardiovascular health.

Primary and secondary prevention of stroke and cardiovascular events using evolocumab and alirocumab: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: Although the clinical role of protein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors for cholesterol management is increasing, the post-marketing period of use is short compared to other lipid-lowering drugs, so there is still insufficient evidence for their efficacy and safety. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated preventive effects of stroke and cardiovascular (CV) events using evolocumab and alirocumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed the relative risk of stroke and CV events after alirocumab or evolocumab treatment in individuals with or without clinical CV diseases compared with that in controls. In addition, we evaluated the relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke. RESULTS: A total of 25 articles were included (median of study duration = 52 weeks). The risk of stroke was significantly decreased after treatment with alirocumab or evolocumab (primary prevention in patients without CV diseases: RR = 0.733; 95% CI, 0.618 - 0.870; secondary prevention in patients with CV diseases: RR = 0.703; 95% CI, 0.562 - 0.880). The risk of CV events also significantly decreased in patients treated with alirocumab or evolocumab (primary prevention: RR = 0.818; 95% CI, 0.777 - 0.861; secondary prevention: RR = 0.725; 95% CI, 0.578 - 0.910). The relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke was not significantly different between PCSK9 inhibitor-treated patients and controls (RR = 1.041; 95% CI, 0.690 - 1.573). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that evolocumab and alirocumab are significantly effective without increasing the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Based on this, the PCSK9 inhibitors can be highly recommended for cholesterol management.

Effect of combining evolocumab with statin on carotid intraplaque neovascularization in patients with premature coronary artery disease (EPOCH).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to explore the effect of PCSK9 inhibitor based on the background of statin on carotid intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) assessed by serial contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) analysis in Chinese patients with premature coronary artery disease (PCAD). METHODS: 41 patients were included to receive treatments with biweekly evolocumab (n = 22) or placebo (n = 19) in addition to statin therapy for 52 weeks. All patients were newly diagnosed with PCAD and treatments were initiated at baseline of the observations. Baseline and 52-week CEUS were acquired to measure the max plaque height (MPH) and IPN. The primary outcome was the 52-week IPN changes, the secondary endpoints included the 52-week MPH changes and major adverse cardiovascular events. RESULTS: The mean ± SD age of the participants was 46.76 ± 8.56 years, and 61% (25/41) of patients were on statins before the start of the study. There was no statistically significant difference in the history of statins treatment and the initiated lipid-lowering therapy of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin between groups (p > 0.05). At 52 weeks, the evolocumab group showed a lower LDL level (0.84 ± 0.45 mmol/L vs. 1.58 ± 0.51 mmol/L, p < 0.001) and a greater decrease in percent reduction of LDL-C level (-65% vs. -32%) and a higher percent of achieving lipid-lowering target (95% vs. 53%, p < 0.05) compared with the placebo group. At 52 weeks, IPN (evolocumab group: 0.50 ± 0.60 vs. 1.50 ± 0.80, p < 0.001; placebo group: 0.79 ± 0.54 vs. 1.26 ± 0.65, p < 0.05) and MPH (evolocumab group: 2.01 ± 0.44 mm vs. 2.57 ± 0.90 mm, p < 0.05, placebo group: 2.21 ± 0.58 mm vs. 2.92 ± 0.86 mm, p < 0.05) reduced significantly in both groups from baseline to 52-week follow-up. IPN and MPH were decreased by both treatments. Still, there was no significant difference in delta (52 weeks - baseline) MPH by an ANOVA analysis between the two groups [evolocumab group: -0.56 mm (2.01 mm-2.57 mm); placebo group: -0.71 mm (2.21 mm-2.92 mm), p > 0.05]. In the evolocumab group, the change in the mean reduction of IPN from baseline [-1.00 (0.50-1.50) vs. -0.47 (0.79-1.26), p < 0.05] and the incidence of patients with carotid IPN decrease were significantly greater reduction (90% vs. 58%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: If compared to placebo, the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab combined with statins resulted in a greater decrease in LDL-C and plaque neovascularization in Chinese patients with PCAD.

Medium-intensity statin with ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin in acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease (MESIA): A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: High-risk stroke patients are recommended to receive high-intensity statin therapy to reduce the risk of stroke recurrence. However, doubling the dosage of statin drugs did not increase the achievement rate of LDL-C target or provide additional clinical benefits, but significantly increased the risk of adverse reactions. Statins and ezetimibe work through different mechanisms and the combined use of statins and ezetimibe significantly improves outcomes with comparable safety profiles. We tested the hypothesis that moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe may offer advantages over the conventional high-intensity statin regimen in terms of efficacy and safety. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older with acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease. We randomly assigned (1:1) participants within the acute phase of ischemic stroke, i.e., within 1 week after the onset of mild ischemic stroke (NIHSS score ≤ 5), within 1 month for severe cases (NIHSS score ≥ 16), and within 2 weeks for the rest, as well as patients with TIA within 1 week of symptom onset, to receive either moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe (either 10-20 mg atorvastatin calcium tablets plus a 10 mg ezetimibe tablet, or 5-10 mg rosuvastatin calcium tablets once per day plus a 10 mg ezetimibe tablet once per day) or high-intensity statin (40 mg atorvastatin calcium tablets or 20 mg rosuvastatin calcium tablets once per day) for 3 months. Randomization was performed using a random number table method. The primary efficacy outcome was the level and achievement rate of LDL-C after 3 months of treatment, specifically LDL-C ≤ 1.8 mmol/L or a reduction in LDL-C ≥ 50 %. The secondary outcome was the incidence of new stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months. The safety outcome was liver and renal function tests, and the occurrence of statin-related muscle events within 3 months. FINDINGS: This trial took place between March 15, 2022, and March 7, 2023. Among 382 patients screened, 150 patients were randomly assigned to receive either medium-intensity statins with ezetimibe (n = 75) or high-intensity statins (n = 75). Median age was 60.0 years (IQR 52.75-70.25); 49 (36.6 %) were women and 85 (63.4 %) were men. The target achievement of LDL-C at 3 months occurred in 62 (89.86 %) of 69 patients in the medium-intensity statin with ezetimibe group and 46 (70.77 %) of 65 patients in the high-intensity statin group (P=0.005, OR=0.273, 95 % CI: 0.106, 0.705). The reduction magnitude of LDL-C in moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe group was significantly higher (-56.540 % vs -47.995 %, P=0.001). Moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe group showing a trend of a greater reduction in LDL-C absolute value than high-intensity statin group but without statistical significance (-1.77±0.90 vs -1.50±0.89, P=0.077). New AIS or TIA within 3 months, liver and renal function tests, and the occurrence of statin-related muscle events within 3 months were also statistically insignificant. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both gender and lipid-lowering regimen as independent risk factors influencing the rate of LDL-C achievement in individuals diagnosed with acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease, but only lipid-lowering regimen had predictive value. INTERPRETATION: Compared to guideline-recommended high-intensity statin therapy, moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe further improved the achievement rate of LDL-C in patients with acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease, with a higher reduction magnitude in LDL-C. In terms of safety, there was no significant difference between the two regimens, suggesting that moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe can also be considered as an initial treatment option for patients with acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease.

Harnessing RNA Interference for Cholesterol Lowering: The Bench-to-Bedside Story of Inclisiran.

Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a cornerstone of reducing risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Despite the approval of nonstatin therapies for LDL-C lowering over the past 2 decades, these medications are underused, and most patients are still not at guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. Barriers include poor adherence, clinical inertia, concern for side effects, cost, and complex prior authorization processes. With atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease-related mortality increasing globally, there remains a need for additional therapeutic options for lowering LDL-C as part of an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention strategy. Following the identification of PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) as a promising therapeutic target, inclisiran was developed using the natural process of RNA interference for robust, sustained prevention of hepatic PCSK9 synthesis. Twice-yearly maintenance subcutaneous inclisiran (following initial loading doses at Day 1 and Day 90) reduces circulating LDL-C levels by ≈50% versus placebo when added to maximally tolerated statins. Long-term safety and tolerability of inclisiran have been assessed, with studies underway to evaluate the effects of inclisiran on cardiovascular outcomes and to provide additional safety and effectiveness data. In 2021, <20 years after the discovery of PCSK9, inclisiran became the first RNA interference therapeutic approved in the United States for LDL-C lowering in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or familial hypercholesterolemia and has since been approved for use in patients with primary hyperlipidemia. This article reviews the journey of inclisiran from bench to bedside, including early development, the clinical trial program, key characteristics of inclisiran, and practical points for its use in the clinic.

Efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors for stroke prevention: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the efficacy and safety of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) on stroke prevention. BACKGROUND: PCSK9i reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein a (LpA) levels. Their efficacy in reducing the risk of major cardiovascular events has been shown in multiple randomized clinical trials (RCT). However, clinical equipoise remains on the magnitude and mechanisms by which PCSK9i decrease the risk of stroke. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of biomedical databases from inception to January 15, 2024, to identify RCTs that investigated the efficacy of PCSK9i versus placebo for major cardiovascular event prevention. The primary outcome was total stroke. The safety outcome was the risk of adverse neurological events, as defined by each trial. Effect size was represented by risk ratio (RR), and analysis was done using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 and Cochrane Q statistics. Meta-regression analyses were performed to assess the association between LDL-C and LpA reduction and stroke risk. RESULTS: Overall, 20 studies with 93,093 patients were included. The quality of the evidence was moderate and heterogeneity for all comparisons was low (I2 < 25 %). The mean age was 60.1 years for the PCSK9i group and 59.6 years for the placebo group, with a mean follow-up time of 60.1 weeks. PCSK9i reduced the LDL-C levels by 11 % and LpA levels by 8 %. PCSK9i were associated with a significant reduction in stroke risk (RR 0.75, 95 % CI 0.66-0.86, I2 = 0 %), without an increase in mortality (RR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.87-1.08, I2 = 0 %). The risk of adverse neurological events was similar between groups (RR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.84-1.18, I2 = 11 %). In meta-regression analyses, the stroke risk was not associated with the magnitude of the effect of PCSK9i on LDL-C (LDL C ß = -0.01, 95 % CI = -0.03-0.02) and LpA (ß = -0.01, 95 % CI = -0.06-0.04) levels. CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9i significantly reduced the stroke risk, without increasing mortality or the risk of adverse neurological events. Our findings also suggest that the beneficial effect of PCSK9i on stroke risk is mediated by LDL-C- and LpA-independent mechanisms.

Anti PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibody Treatment in Elderly Patients: A Real-world Clinical Experience.

BACKGROUND: The use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9 mAbs) is emerging for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, real-world data is lacking for their use among elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: To define the characteristics of elderly patients treated with PCSK9 mAbs and to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability compared with younger patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of elderly patients (≥ 75 years at enrollment) treated with PCSK9 mAbs for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention. Data were retrieved for demographic and clinical characteristics; indications for treatment; agents and dosages; concomitant lipid lowering treatment; LDL-C levels at baseline, 6, 12 months, and at the end of follow up. Data also included achieving LDL-C target levels and adverse effects. RESULTS: The cohort included 91 elderly patients and 92 younger patients, mean age 75.2 ± 3.76 and 58.9 ± 7.4 years (P < 0.0001). Most patients (82%, 80%) were in high/very high-risk categories. For almost all (98%, 99%), the indication was statin intolerance, with PCSK9 mAb monotherapy the most prevalent regimen. The average follow-up was 38.1 ± 20.5 and 30.9 ± 15.8 months (P = 0.0258). Within 6 months the LDL-C levels were reduced by 57% in the elderly group and by 59% in the control group (P = 0.2371). Only 53% and 57% reached their LDL-C target levels. No clinically significant side effects were documented. CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9 mAbs have similar effects and are well tolerated among elderly patients as in younger patients.

Monacolin K supplementation in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review of clinical trials.

Monacolin K is the major active component in red yeast rice (RYR) which is structurally identical to lovastatin and has the most powerful effect, in terms of reducing blood cholesterol levels. This review aimed to examine the effect and safety of different doses of monacolin K on blood cholesterol levels. PubMed and Cochrane were searched for articles published between 2012 and 2023 for clinical-trials and randomized-controlled-trials. Eligible studies included participants>18-years-old, of any gender and ethnicity. The intervention/exposure of interest was monacolin K. Hypercholesterolemia was considered the outcome of interest defined as the elevated total or low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. 12 randomized-controlled-trials were eligible for inclusion in the analysis including 769 participants>18-years-old. 11 out of 12 studies were assessed with high methodological quality and one study with low methodological quality. Monacolin K supplementation varied between 2mg and 10mg per day and the maximum period of supplementation was 12 weeks. All studies indicated a beneficial effect of monacolin supplementation on LDL and total cholesterol levels (p<0.05) regardless the dose and period of supplementation. Also, 3 of the included studies reported adverse side effects after treatment with monacolin K. Low doses of monacolin K equal to 3mg/day exert potential cholesterol-lowering effects although the number of relative studies is limited. Regarding the safety of monacolin K supplementation, findings seem to be more controversial and therefore, it is suggested for all patients treated with monacolin K to be routinely monitored regardless the dose of supplementation.

PCSK9 inhibition with orally administered NNC0385-0434 in hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Currently available injectable drugs that target proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) reduce serum LDL cholesterol and improve cardiovascular outcomes. This phase 2 study assessed NNC0385-0434, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in individuals receiving oral lipid-lowering therapy. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled trial, 42 research sites across seven countries (Belgium, Germany, Greece, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, and the USA) recruited individuals with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (aged ≥40 years) or at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (aged >50 years), who had LDL cholesterol concentration of at least 1·8 mmol/L and were receiving maximum tolerated statins and stable lipid-lowering therapy. The study randomly allocated participants (3:1) with an interactive web response system to receive either NNC0385-0434 (15 mg, 40 mg, or 100 mg) once a day co-formulated with the oral absorption enhancer sodium N-[8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl)amino] caprylate (500 mg); placebo; or open-label evolocumab (140 mg) every 2 weeks administered subcutaneously. Blinding was performed within each dose level. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in LDL cholesterol measured by ß quantification at week 12. All randomly assigned participants received at least one dose of treatment and were included in both safety and efficacy analyses. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04992065, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Aug 16, 2021, and Jan 28, 2022, we randomly assigned 267 patients to one of the three NNC0385-0434 dose cohorts (n=53 per cohort), matching placebo (n=54), or open-label evolocumab (n=54). The study population comprised 82 (31%) women and 185 (69%) men; mean age was 64·3 years (SD 9·0). Baseline mean LDL cholesterol concentration was 2·7 mmol/L (SD 0·8). Treatment with NNC0385-0434 resulted in reductions in LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 12, of 32·0 percentage points (95% CI 20·9 to 43·0) in the 15 mg cohort, 44·9 percentage points (33·8 to 56·0) in the 40 mg cohort, and 61·8 percentage points (50·7 to 72·9) in the 100 mg cohort, compared with the placebo group (p<0·0001 for each). Patients treated with evolocumab had similar LDL cholesterol reductions (59·6% [SE 4·1] decrease from baseline) to patients receiving NNC0385-0434 100 mg (56·2% [4·0]). The estimated treatment difference between NNC0385-0434 100 mg and evolocumab 140 mg was 3·4 percentage points [95% CI -7·8 to 14·7]. The most frequently reported adverse event was COVID-19, which affected 31 (12%) of 267 patients, with similar numbers across treatment groups. Investigative sites reported gastrointestinal disorders as the most frequent treatment-related adverse event (26 patients and 35 events total in the three NNC0385 cohorts and one patient and one event each in the placebo and evolocumab cohorts). No deaths or treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. INTERPRETATION: This study showed excellent 12-week LDL cholesterol lowering efficacy and good patient tolerance of an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, NNC0835-0434, similar to an injectable drug. However, the sponsor chose to discontinue further development of NNC0835-0434 due to portfolio considerations. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.

Safety and Efficacy of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin-Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Elevated circulating cholesterol levels in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) increase morbidity and mortality. Recent studies reported that PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) have a beneficial effect on various domains of patients' lipid profiles and cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. Here, we aim to further investigate the efficacy and safety of PCSK9i in patients with ACS or who experienced recent episodes. METHODS: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing PCSK9i versus placebo. Data were extracted and analysed using Stata/MP version 17.0. RESULTS: Eleven studies (n = 24,732) were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of efficacy outcomes, compared with the control group, PCSK9i significantly decreased levels of LDL-C, TC, TG, Lp (a) and Apo-B, with the following values, respectively: Cohen's d of - 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI - 1.64 to - 0.87); Cohen's d of - 1.32, 95% CI (- 1.83 to - 0.81); Cohen's d of - 0.26, 95% CI (- 0.37 to - 0.14); Cohen's d of - 0.70, 95% CI (- 1.15 to - 0.26); and Cohen's d of - 1.46, 95% CI (- 1.97 to - 0.94). The levels of HDL-C and Apo-A1 increased by: Cohen's d 0.27, 95% CI (0.16-0.39) and Cohen's d of 0.30, 95% CI (0.17-0.42), respectively. Regarding safety outcomes, PCSK9i was associated with lower odds of myocardial infarction (MI) and cerebrovascular events with the following values, respectively: OR = 0.87, 95% CI (0.78-0.97) and OR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.52-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9i was associated with better lipid profile and quality of life of patients and can be recommended as an optimal treatment strategy. Further trials should study combinations of PCSK9i with other lipid-lowering drugs.

Long-Term Efficacy and Tolerability of PCSK9 Targeted Therapy: A Review of the Literature.

Increased plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are causally associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and statins that lower LDL-C have been the cornerstone of ASCVD prevention for decades. However, guideline-recommended LDL-C targets are not achieved in about 60% of statin users. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)-targeted therapy effectively lowers LDL-C levels and has been shown to reduce ASCVD risk. A growing body of scientific and clinical evidence shows that PCSK9-targeted therapy offers an excellent safety and tolerability profile with a low incidence of side effects in the short term. In this review, we present and discuss the current clinical and scientific evidence pertaining to the long-term efficacy and tolerability of PCSK9-targeted therapy.