ABSTRACT
Hydrogel-forming microneedle array patches (HFMAPs) are microneedles that create microconduits upon insertion and swelling in the skin, potentially allowing prolonged drug delivery without generating sharps waste. Delivering hydrophobic drugs using HFMAPs poses challenges, which can be addressed using solubility enhancers such as cyclodextrins (CDs). This study aimed to deliver risperidone (RIS) transdermally using HFMAPs. To enhance the aqueous solubility of RIS hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HP-ß-CD) and hydroxypropyl-gamma-cyclodextrin (HP-γ-CD) were utilised and their performance was tested using phase solubility studies. The aqueous solubility of RIS was enhanced by 4.75-fold and 2-fold using HP-ß-CD and HP-γ-CD, respectively. RIS-HP-ß-CD complex (CX) and physical mixture (PM) directly compressed tablets were prepared and combined with HFMAPs. Among the tested formulations, RIS-HP-ß-CD PM reservoirs with 11 x 11 PVA/PVP HFMAPs exhibited the best performance in ex vivo studies and were further evaluated in in vivo experiments using female Sprague Dawley rats. The extended wear time of the MAPs resulted in the sustained release of RIS and its active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone (9-OH-RIS) in plasma samples, lasting from 3 to 5 days with a 1-day application and up to 10 days with a 5-day application. For a 1-day application, HFMAPs showed greater systemic exposure to RIS compared to intramuscular control (AUC0-t: 13330.05 ± 2759.95 ng/mL/hour versus 2706 ± 1472 ng/mL/hour). Moreover, RIS exposure was extended to 5 days (AUC0-t: 12292.37 ± 1801.94 ng/mL/hour). In conclusion, HFMAPs could serve as an alternative for delivering RIS in a sustained manner, potentially improving the treatment of schizophrenia.
Subject(s)
2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin , Administration, Cutaneous , Drug Delivery Systems , Hydrogels , Risperidone , Solubility , Risperidone/administration & dosage , Risperidone/pharmacokinetics , Risperidone/chemistry , Animals , Hydrogels/chemistry , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Drug Delivery Systems/instrumentation , 2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin/chemistry , Rats , Needles , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Skin Absorption , Cyclodextrins/chemistry , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Female , Skin/metabolismABSTRACT
Schizophrenia is a psychiatric disorder that results from abnormal levels of neurotransmitters in the brain. Risperidone (RIS) is a common drug prescribed for the treatment of schizophrenia. RIS is a hydrophobic drug that is typically administered orally or intramuscularly. Transdermal drug delivery (TDD) could potentially improve the delivery of RIS. This study focused on the development of RIS nanocrystals (NCs), for the first time, which were incorporated into dissolving microneedle array patches (DMAPs) to facilitate the drug delivery of RIS. RIS NCs were formulated via wet-media milling technique using poly(vinylalcohol) (PVA) as a stabiliser. NCs with particle size of 300 nm were produced and showed an enhanced release profile up to 80 % over 28 days. Ex vivo results showed that 1.16 ± 0.04 mg of RIS was delivered to both the receiver compartment and full-thickness skin from NCs loaded DMAPs compared to 0.75 ± 0.07 mg from bulk RIS DMAPs. In an in vivo study conducted using female Sprague Dawley rats, both RIS and its active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone (9-OH-RIS) were detected in plasma samples for 5 days. In comparison with the oral group, DMAPs improved the overall pharmacokinetic profile in plasma with a â¼ 15 folds higher area under the curve (AUC) value. This work has represented the novel delivery of the antipsychotic drug, RIS, through microneedles. It also offers substantial evidence to support the broader application of MAPs for the transdermal delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs.
Subject(s)
Administration, Cutaneous , Antipsychotic Agents , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Risperidone , Schizophrenia , Animals , Risperidone/administration & dosage , Risperidone/pharmacokinetics , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Female , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Transdermal Patch , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Nanoparticles/administration & dosage , Drug Liberation , Skin Absorption , Rats , Drug Delivery Systems , Skin/metabolism , Polyvinyl Alcohol/chemistry , Paliperidone Palmitate/administration & dosage , Paliperidone Palmitate/pharmacokinetics , Particle Size , Solubility , NeedlesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clozapine is the medication of choice for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, it has a complex metabolism and unexplained interindividual variability. The current work aims to develop a pharmacokinetic model of clozapine and norclozapine in non-smokers and assess the impact of demographic and genetic predictors. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were recruited in a population pharmacokinetic study. Blood samples were collected at 30 min and 1, 2, 3, 5 and 8 h following a single flat dose of clozapine (12.5 mg). The clozapine and norclozapine concentrations were measured via high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method. A semi-physiological pharmacokinetic model of clozapine and norclozapine was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Clinical and genetic predictors were evaluated, including CYP1A2 (rs762551) and ABCB1 (rs2032582), using restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: A total of 270 samples were collected from 33 participants. The data were best described using a two-compartment model for clozapine and a two-compartment model for norclozapine with first-order absorption and elimination and pre-systemic metabolism. The estimated (relative standard error) clearance of clozapine and norclozapine were 27 L h-1 (31.5 %) and 19.6 L h-1 (30%), respectively. Clozapine clearance was lower in sub-Saharan Africans (n = 4) and higher in Caucasians (n = 9) than Asians (n = 20). Participants with CYP1A2 (rs762551) (n = 18) and ABCB1 (rs2032582) (n = 12) mutant alleles had lower clozapine clearance in the univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to develop a semi-physiological pharmacokinetic model of clozapine and norclozapine accounting for the pre-systemic metabolism. Asians required lower doses of clozapine as compared with Caucasians, while clozapine pharmacokinetics in sub-Saharan Africans should be further investigated in larger trials.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2 , Healthy Volunteers , Models, Biological , Clozapine/pharmacokinetics , Clozapine/analogs & derivatives , Clozapine/administration & dosage , Clozapine/blood , Humans , Adult , Male , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Female , Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2/metabolism , Young Adult , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B/genetics , Middle AgedABSTRACT
In vitro-In vivo correlation (IVIVC) is a main focus of the pharmaceutical industry, academia and the regulatory sectors, as this is an effective modelling tool to predict drug product in vivo performance based on in vitro release data and serve as a surrogate for bioequivalence studies, significantly reducing the need for clinical studies. Till now, IVIVCs have not been successfully developed for in situ forming implants due to the significantly different in vitro and in vivo drug release profiles that are typically achieved for these dosage forms. This is not unexpected considering the unique complexity of the drug release mechanisms of these products. Using risperidone in situ forming implants as a model, the current work focuses on: 1) identification of critical attributes of in vitro release testing methods that may contribute to differences in in vitro and in vivo drug release from in situ forming implants; and 2) optimization of the in vitro release method, with the aim of developing Level A IVIVCs for risperidone implants. Dissolution methods based on a novel Teflon shape controlling adapter along with a water non-dissolvable glass fiber membrane (GF/F) instead of a water dissolvable PVA film (named as GF/F-Teflon adapter and PVA-Teflon adapter, respectively), and an in-house fabricated Glass slide adapter were used to investigate the impact of: the surface-to-volume ratio, water uptake ratio, phase separation rate (measured by NMP release in 24 h post injection in vitro or in vivo), and mechanical pressure on the drug release patterns. The surface-to-volume ratio and water uptake were shown to be more critical in vitro release testing method attributes compared to the phase separation rate and mechanical pressure. The Glass slide adapter-based dissolution method, which allowed for the formation of depots with bio-mimicking surface-to-volume ratios and sufficient water uptake, has the ability to generate bio-relevant degradation profiles as well as in vitro release profiles for risperidone implants. For the first time, a Level A IVIVC (rabbit model) has been successfully developed for in situ forming implants. Release data for implant formulations with slightly different PLGA molecular weights (MWs) were used to develop the IVIVC. The predictability of the model passed external validation using the reference listed drug (RLD), Perseris®. IVIVC could not be developed when formulations with different PLGA molar ratios of lactic acid to glycolic acid (L/G) were included. The present work provides a comprehensive understanding of the impact of the testing method attributes on drug release from in situ forming implants, which is a valuable practice for level A IVIVC development.
Subject(s)
Drug Implants , Drug Liberation , Risperidone , Risperidone/administration & dosage , Risperidone/pharmacokinetics , Risperidone/chemistry , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/chemistry , Animals , SolubilityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach was implemented for paliperidone palmitate (PP) 6-month (PP6M) clinical development, using pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-based simulations. METHODS: PP6M pharmacokinetics were simulated by extending the PP 3-month (PP3M) pharmacokinetic model to account for increased injection volume, and hence dose. Contribution of the MIDD approach to the design of the pivotal PP6M phase-3 study (PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study, NCT03345342) investigating schizophrenia relapse rates was twofold: (1) PP6M dose selection, and (2) hypothesis generation that lower trough concentrations (Ctrough) associated with PP6M, relative to PP3M, were not associated with lower efficacy, which was to be evaluated in the phase-3 study. Moreover, accompanied by an intense sampling scheme to adequately characterize paliperidone pharmacokinetics and to elucidate the potential relationship between concentration and safety/efficacy, the bridging strategy eliminated the need for additional phase-1/phase-2 clinical studies. RESULTS: Using a MIDD bridging strategy, PP6M doses were selected that, compared with PP3M, were expected to have a similar range of exposures and a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile. Clinical data from PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study confirmed that PP6M, compared with PP3M, had a similar range of exposures (T'jollyn et al. in Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2024), as well as a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile (this manuscript). CONCLUSIONS: Consistency of the MIDD approach with observed clinical outcomes confirmed the hypothesis that lower Ctrough did not lead to increased relapse rates at the doses administered. Although higher paliperidone peak concentrations are achieved with corresponding doses of PP6M relative to PP3M in the phase-3 clinical study, types and incidences of treatment-related adverse events were comparable between PP6M and PP3M groups and no new safety concerns emerged for PP6M (Najarian et al. in Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 25(3):238-251, 2022).
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Paliperidone Palmitate , Schizophrenia , Paliperidone Palmitate/pharmacokinetics , Paliperidone Palmitate/administration & dosage , Paliperidone Palmitate/adverse effects , Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Models, Biological , Drug Administration Schedule , Adult , Male , Female , Drug Development/methods , Computer SimulationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) intramuscular (IM) injection is the longest-acting treatment available for patients with schizophrenia. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) modeling and simulation approach was deployed to inform dosing strategies for PP6M. METHODS: The extensive analysis database included 15,932 paliperidone samples from 700 patients receiving gluteal paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) or PP6M injections in the double-blind phase of a phase-3 noninferiority study (NCT03345342). Exposure parameters for paliperidone appeared to increase dose-proportionally within each dosing schedule (PP3M/PP6M). The range of paliperidone exposures after IM administration of PP6M overlaps with that of corresponding doses of oral paliperidone extended release, PP 1-month (PP1M), and PP3M. Model-based simulations were performed to investigate paliperidone exposures in different PP6M dosing scenarios and relevant subpopulations. RESULTS: A dosing window of ≤ 2 weeks earlier and ≤ 3 weeks later than the target 6-month interval for maintenance treatment with PP6M dosing maintains paliperidone exposures at levels that are not expected to substantially impact its safety and efficacy. For missed-dose scenarios, tailored re-initiation regimens are proposed that should be applied before resuming PP6M maintenance dosing. Regarding subpopulations, PP6M 700 mg eq. is the highest dose recommended in mild renal-impairment patients; the paliperidone pharmacokinetics after PP6M administration is not affected by sex, body mass index, or age in a clinically meaningful way. CONCLUSION: Paliperidone concentration-time profiles after PP6M and PP3M dosing were adequately described by the popPK model. Model-based simulation results provide guidance for clinicians on initiating PP6M therapy, transitioning between paliperidone formulations, the dosing windows to use for maintenance dosing, and managing missed PP6M doses.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Models, Biological , Paliperidone Palmitate , Schizophrenia , Paliperidone Palmitate/pharmacokinetics , Paliperidone Palmitate/administration & dosage , Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Adult , Male , Female , Injections, Intramuscular , Middle Aged , Double-Blind Method , Computer Simulation , Drug Administration Schedule , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Young Adult , Delayed-Action Preparations/pharmacokinetics , AdolescentABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cariprazine is an atypical dopamine receptor partial agonist antipsychotic available in the form of capsules. Although capsules are one of the most desirable routes of administration, there are certain situations (e. g., in an acute psychiatric setting, or when swallowing difficulties, or liquid shortages are present) when they cannot be administered. Therefore, alternative solutions like orodispersible tablets are needed. This study aimed to investigate the bioequivalence of a newly developed orodispersible tablet to the commercially available hard gelatine capsule of cariprazine 1.5 mg. METHODS: This was a phase I, open-label, randomized, single-dose bioequivalence study. It had a 2-period, 2-sequence, cross-over design, where each subject received one test and one reference product in a randomized sequence, separated by a wash-out period of 55 days. Blood sampling was performed over 72 h after dosing. Cariprazine concentrations were analyzed by a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. Standard bioequivalence statistics was applied to PK parameters calculated by non-compartmental analysis. Safety measures were analyzed descriptively. RESULT: Pharmacokinetic data of 43 healthy volunteers and safety data of 54 subjects was analyzed. Cariprazine AUC0-72h and Cmax geometric mean ratios were 117.76% and 100.88%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals were within the pre-defined bioequivalence acceptance limits of 80.00% - 125.00%. Safety data was in line with the Summary of Product Characteristics of Cariprazine. DISCUSSION: The result of this clinical trial proved the bioequivalence of the new orodispersible tablet formulation when compared to hard gelatine capsules, enabling an alternative option for treatment of those suffering from schizophrenia.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Cross-Over Studies , Piperazines , Tablets , Therapeutic Equivalency , Humans , Male , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Piperazines/administration & dosage , Piperazines/pharmacokinetics , Young Adult , Female , Administration, Oral , Middle Aged , Area Under Curve , CapsulesABSTRACT
Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), also known as atypical antipsychotics, are a newer class of antipsychotic drugs used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and related psychiatric conditions. The plasma concentration of antipsychotic drugs is a valid measure of the drug at its primary target structure in the brain, and therefore determines the efficacy and safety of these drugs. However, despite the well-known high variability in pharmacokinetics of these substances, psychiatric medication is usually administered in uniform dosage schedules. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), as the specific method that can help personalised medicine in dose adjustment according to the characteristics of the individual patient, minimizing the risk of toxicity, monitoring adherence, and increasing cost-effectiveness in the treatment, thus seems to be an elegant tool to solve this problem. Non-response to therapeutic doses, uncertain adherence to medication, suboptimal tolerability, or pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are typical indications for TDM of SGAs. This review aims to summarize an overview of the current knowledge and evidence of the possibilities to tailor the dosage of selected SGAs using TDM, including the necessary pharmacokinetic parameters for personalised pharmacotherapy.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Drug Monitoring , Humans , Drug Monitoring/methods , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapyABSTRACT
Both biphasic dissolution and simultaneous dissolution-permeation (D-P) systems have great potential to improve the in vitro-in vivo correlation compared to simple dissolution assays, but the assay conditions, and the evaluation methods still need to be refined in order to effectively use these apparatuses in drug development. Therefore, this comprehensive study aimed to compare the predictive accuracy of small-volume (16-20 mL) D-P system and small-volume (40-80 mL) biphasic dissolution apparatus in bioequivalence prediction of five aripiprazole (ARP) containing marketed drug products. Assay conditions, specifically dose dependence were studied to overcome the limitations of both small-scale systems. In case of biphasic dissolution the in vivo maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) prediction greatly improved with the dose reduction of ARP, while in case of the D-P setup the use of whole tablet gave just as accurate prediction as the scaled dose. With the dose reduction strategy both equipment was able to reach 100 % accuracy in bioequivalence prediction for Cmax ratio. In case of the in vivo area under the curve (AUC) prediction the predictive accuracy for the AUC ratio was not dependent on the dose, and both apparatus had a 100 % accuracy predicting bioequivalence based on AUC results. This paper presents for the first time that not only selected parameters of flux assays (like permeability, initial flux, AUC value) were used as an input parameter of a mechanistic model (gastrointestinal unified theory) to predict absorption rate but the whole in vitro flux profile was used. All fraction absorbed values estimated by Predictor Software fell within the ±15 % acceptance range during the comparison with the in vivo data.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Aripiprazole , Solubility , Therapeutic Equivalency , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Aripiprazole/blood , Aripiprazole/chemistry , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/blood , Antipsychotic Agents/chemistry , Permeability , Drug Liberation , Humans , Area Under Curve , TabletsABSTRACT
Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI) is a frequently used treatment modality which has advantages over oral antipsychotics regarding hospitalization or relapse prevention. However, the pharmacokinetic properties of LAI greatly differ from oral antipsychotics. This necessitates an increased knowledge about LAI among clinicians, especially when commencing treatment, changing doses and discontinuing treatment. In this review, we summarize an array of clinically important characteristics of LAI and give a conceptual framework for understanding the pharmacokinetics of LAI.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Delayed-Action Preparations , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Injections , Injections, IntramuscularABSTRACT
Lumateperone is a novel agent approved by FDA for treatment of schizophrenia in adults. To elucidate the species differences in the of biotransformation of lumateperone and its pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics in rats, the metabolite identification of lumateperone was carried out in rat, dog and human liver microsomes, and rat plasma after oral administration using UPLC-Q Exactive Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry HRMS. Furtherly, the PK characteristics of lumateperone and its N-demethylated metabolite (M3) in rat plasma were investigated using a validated LC-MS/MS method following intravenous and oral administration. Fourteen phase I metabolites were found in liver microsomes and ten of them were observed in rat plasma. N-demethylation, carbonylation, dehydrogenation, and piperazine ring cleavage were main metabolic pathway of lumateperone. No unique metabolites were formed in human liver microsomes. After rapid absorption in rats, lumateperone was quickly metabolized and eliminated with bioavailability of less than 5%. The exposure level of M3 was about 1.5-fold higher than that of lumateperone in rat plasma. Lumatperone underwent extensive metabolism and was absorbed rapidly in rats. Metabolite M3 had equivalent or slightly higher exposure levels than lumateperone. This study provides essential PK information to facilitate further pharmacodynamic researches of lumateperone.
Subject(s)
Microsomes, Liver , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Animals , Microsomes, Liver/metabolism , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Dogs , Rats , Humans , Male , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Administration, Oral , Biological Availability , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/blood , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Biotransformation , Piperazines/pharmacokinetics , Piperazines/blood , Liquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Clozapine is the effective therapy for treatment-refractory schizophrenia. However, the use of clozapine is limited by its adverse effects. As propranolol is frequently used for the prevention and treatment of clozapine-induced tachycardia, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of propranolol on steady state pharmacokinetics of clozapine in schizophrenic patients. METHODS: We included 16 retrospective studies on the effects of propranolol on steady state pharmacokinetics of clozapine in schizophrenic patients, with data from both generic and brand name treatment phases in eight clozapine bioequivalence studies conducted in a single center in China from 2018 to 2022. Review Manager 5.4 was used for meta-analysis of the included studies. RESULTS: The SMDs with 95% CIs of AUC0-12, Cmax,ss, C, and C were calculated to be 0.44 (0.23, 0.64), 0.40 (0.20, 0.61), 0.43 (0.22, 0.63), and 0.44 (0.23, 0.64), respectively. These findings proved that combination with propranolol would increase the systemic exposure of clozapine. T1/2 of clozapine was significantly longer in the presence of propranolol than in the absence of propranolol (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.12, 0.52], p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference for T of clozapine in the presence or absence of propranolol (SMD = - 0.05, 95% CI [- 0.25, 0.15], p = 0.63). CONCLUSION: The combination with propranolol could significantly increase systemic exposure and extended T1/2 of clozapine, and thus need to be considered in prescribing decisions.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Propranolol , Clozapine/pharmacokinetics , Clozapine/therapeutic use , Clozapine/adverse effects , Humans , Propranolol/pharmacokinetics , Propranolol/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Therapeutic Equivalency , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Drug InteractionsABSTRACT
A ready-to-use (RTU) long-acting injectable (LAI) formulation of aripiprazole monohydrate for administration once every 2 months, available in 960 mg (Ari 2MRTU 960) or 720 mg doses, has been developed for the treatment of schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder. A previously developed and validated population pharmacokinetic model for characterizing aripiprazole plasma concentrations following administration of oral aripiprazole or aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) intramuscular injection was expanded to include the RTU LAI formulation of aripiprazole (Ari RTU LAI). Overall, 8899 aripiprazole pharmacokinetic samples from 1191 adults from 10 clinical trials were included in the final combined analysis data set. Aripiprazole plasma concentration-time profiles were simulated for various Ari RTU LAI initiation and maintenance scenarios in 1000 virtual patients. Diagnostic plots demonstrated that the final population pharmacokinetic model, which incorporated data for oral aripiprazole, AOM, and Ari RTU LAI, adequately described aripiprazole concentrations following Ari RTU LAI administration. Absorption of Ari RTU LAI was modeled by a parallel zero-order and lagged first-order process. Simulations across multiple scenarios were performed to inform dosing recommendations, including various treatment initiation regimens for a 2-monthly formulation of Ari RTU LAI in patients with or without prior stabilization on oral aripiprazole, and for patients switching from AOM. Additional simulations accounted for missed/delayed doses, cytochrome (CYP) 2D6 metabolizer status, and concomitant use of CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 inhibitors. Overall, simulations across a variety of scenarios demonstrated an Ari RTU LAI pharmacokinetic exposure profile that was comparable to AOM, with a longer dosing interval.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Aripiprazole , Bipolar Disorder , Computer Simulation , Delayed-Action Preparations , Models, Biological , Schizophrenia , Humans , Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Injections, Intramuscular , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Aged , Drug Administration ScheduleABSTRACT
Clozapine is characterized by a large within- and between-patient variability in its pharmacokinetics, attributed to non-genetic and genetic factors. A cross-sectional analysis of clozapine trough concentration (Clz C0) issued from Tunisian schizophrenic patients was collected and analysed using a nonparametric modelling approach. We assessed the impact of demographic covariates (age, weight and sex), patient's habits (smoking status, alcohol and caffeine intake) and the genetic factors (CYP1A2*1C, CYP1A2*1F and CYP2C19*2 polymorphisms) on each pharmacokinetic parameter. An external validation of this pharmacokinetic model using an independent data set was performed. Fit goodness between observed- and individual-predicted data was evaluated using the mean prediction error (% MPE), the mean absolute prediction error (% MAPE) as a measure of bias, and the root mean squared error (% RMSE) as a measure of precision. Sixty-three CLz C0 values issued from 51 schizophrenic patients were assessed in this study and divided into building and validation groups. CYP1A2*1F polymorphism and smoking status were the only covariates significantly associated with clozapine clearance. Precision parameters were as follows: 1.02%, 0.95% and 22.4%, respectively, for % MPE, % MAPE and % RMSE. We developed and validated an accurate pharmacokinetic model able to predict Clz C0 in Tunisian schizophrenic patients using the two parameters CYP1A2*1F polymorphism and smoking.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2 , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 , Schizophrenia , Humans , Clozapine/pharmacokinetics , Clozapine/blood , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/genetics , Male , Female , Tunisia , Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2/metabolism , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Models, Biological , Smoking , Young Adult , Polymorphism, GeneticABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Τhe aim of the present study was to investigate the use of vitreous humor as an alternative biological material in forensic toxicology for the determination of quetiapine, 7-hydroxy-quetiapine, and nor-quetiapine. The distribution of these substances in vitreous humor was studied by determining and correlating their concentrations in vitreous humor with the respective concentrations in blood. METHODS: During this study, a method for the determination of these substances was developed, validated and applied to postmortem samples obtained from 16 relative forensic cases. The sample preparation procedure included the isolation of the analytes from vitreous humor and blood samples using solid-phase extraction, with Bond Elut LRC C18 columns followed by derivatization with BSTFA with 1% TMCS prior to GC/MS analysis. RESULTS: The developed method is characterized by a dynamic range of 10.0-1000.0 ng/mL (R2 ≥ 0.991) for the three substances, with a limit of detection and quantification of 3.0 and 10.0 ng/mL, respectively. Accuracy and precision were below 8.09% and 8.99%, respectively, for both biological materials, while absolute recovery for the three substances was greater than 81%. According to the results, quetiapine, 7-hydroxy-quetiapine, and nor-quetiapine are easily distributed in vitreous humor. CONCLUSION: The results of the study indicate the usefulness of vitreous humor in toxicological analysis for the determination of these substances, especially when the traditional biological materials are not available. The levels of quetiapine and its metabolites in vitreous humor as well as the vitreous humor to blood concentration ratios can provide important information for a more thorough toxicological investigation of forensic cases.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Forensic Toxicology , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Quetiapine Fumarate , Solid Phase Extraction , Vitreous Body , Vitreous Body/chemistry , Vitreous Body/metabolism , Vitreous Body/drug effects , Quetiapine Fumarate/pharmacokinetics , Quetiapine Fumarate/analysis , Humans , Forensic Toxicology/methods , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Male , Limit of Detection , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , DibenzothiazepinesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clozapine is unique in its capacity to ameliorate severe schizophrenia but at high risk of toxicity. A relationship between blood concentration and clinical response and evidence for concentration-response relationships to some adverse effects justify therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine. However, the relationship between drug dose and blood concentration is quite variable. This variability is, in part, due to inductive and inhibitory interactions varying the activity of cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2), the principal pathway for clozapine elimination. Several population pharmacokinetic models have been presented to facilitate dose selection and to identify poor adherence in individual patients. These models have faced little testing for validity in independent populations or even for persisting validity in the source population. METHODS: Therefore, we collected a large population of clozapine-treated patients (127 patients, 1048 timed plasma concentrations) in whom dosing and covariate information could be obtained with high certainty. A population pharmacokinetic model was constructed with data collected in the first 6 weeks from study enrolment (448 plasma concentrations), to estimate covariate influences and to allow alignment with previously published models. The model was tested for its performance in predicting the concentrations observed at later time intervals up to 5 years. The predictive performances of 6 published clozapine population models were then assessed in the entire population. RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetic model based on the first 6 weeks identified significant influences of sex, smoking, and cotreatment with fluvoxamine on clozapine clearance. The model built from the first 6 weeks had acceptable predictive performance in the same patient population up to the first 26 weeks using individual parameters, with a median predictive error (PE) of -0.1% to -15.9% and median absolute PE of 22.9%-27.1%. Predictive performance fell progressively with time after 26 weeks. Bayesian addition of plasma concentration observations within each prediction period improved individual predictions. Three additional observations extended acceptable predictive performance into the second 6 months of therapy. When the published models were tested with the entire data set, median PE ranged from -8% to +35% with a median absolute PE of >39% in all models. Thus, none of the tested models was successful in external validation. Bayesian addition of single patient observations improved individual predictions from all models but still without achieving acceptable performances. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the relationship between covariates and blood clozapine concentrations differs between populations and that relationships are not stable over time within a population. Current population models for clozapine are not capturing influential covariates.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Schizophrenia , Humans , Clozapine/therapeutic use , Bayes Theorem , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Fluvoxamine/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokineticsABSTRACT
A pharmacokinetic (PK) bridging approach was successfully employed to support the dosing regimen and approval of brexpiprazole in pediatric patients aged 13-17 years with schizophrenia. Brexpiprazole was approved in 2015 for the treatment of schizophrenia and the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder in adults based on efficacy and safety data from clinical trials. On January 13, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a general advice letter to sponsors highlighting the acceptance of efficacy extrapolation of certain atypical antipsychotics from adult patients to pediatric patients considering the similarity in disease and exposure-response relationships. Brexpiprazole is the first atypical antipsychotic approved in pediatrics using this approach. The PK data available from pediatric patients aged 13-17 years have shown high variability due to the limited number of PK evaluable subjects, which limits a robust estimation of differences between adult and pediatric patients. The PK model-based approach was thus utilized to evaluate the appropriateness of the dosing regimen by comparing PK exposures in pediatric patients aged 13-17 years with exposures achieved in adults at the approved doses. In addition to exposure matching, safety data from a long-term open-label clinical study in pediatric patients informed the safety profile in pediatric patients. This report illustrates the potential of leveraging previously collected efficacy, safety, and PK data in adult patients to make a regulatory decision in pediatric patients for the indication of schizophrenia.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Drug Approval , Quinolones , Schizophrenia , Thiophenes , United States Food and Drug Administration , Humans , Adolescent , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , United States , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Quinolones/pharmacokinetics , Quinolones/therapeutic use , Quinolones/adverse effects , Quinolones/administration & dosage , Thiophenes/pharmacokinetics , Thiophenes/adverse effects , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , Thiophenes/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Models, Biological , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , AdultABSTRACT
Pediatric drug dosing is challenged by the heterogeneity of developing physiology and ethical considerations surrounding a vulnerable population. Often, pediatric drug dosing leverages findings from the adult population; however, recent regulatory efforts have motivated drug sponsors to pursue pediatric-specific programs to meet an unmet medical need and improve pediatric drug labeling. This paradigm is further complicated by the pathophysiological implications of obesity on drug distribution and metabolism and the roles that body composition and body size play in drug dosing. Therefore, we sought to understand the landscape of pediatric drug dosing by characterizing the dosing strategies from drug products recently approved for pediatric indications identified using FDA Drug Databases and analyze the impact of body size descriptors (age, body surface area, weight) on drug pharmacokinetics for several selected antipsychotics approved in pediatric patients. Our review of these pediatric databases revealed a dependence on body size-guided dosing, with 68% of dosing in pediatric drug labelings being dependent on knowing either the age, body surface area, or weight of the patient to guide dosing for pediatric patients. This dependence on body size-guided dosing drives the need for special consideration when dosing a drug in overweight and obese patients. Exploratory pharmacokinetic analyses in antipsychotics illustrate possible effects of drug exposure when applying different dosing strategies for this class of drugs. Future efforts should aim to further understand the pediatric drug dosing and obesity paradigm across pediatric age ranges and drug classes to optimize drug development and clinical care for this patient population.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Humans , Child , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Drug Dosage Calculations , Age Factors , Drug Labeling , Child, Preschool , United States , Adolescent , Infant , Body Surface Area , Body Weight , United States Food and Drug Administration , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Databases, PharmaceuticalABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Lamotrigine was previously reported to reduce serum concentration of quetiapine. The aim of this study was to investigate whether lamotrigine dose or quetiapine formulation was of importance for the drug interaction. METHODS: Patients combining lamotrigine with quetiapine (cases) were included retrospectively from a routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service, as were a control group of patients using quetiapine without any interacting drugs. The case and control groups were divided into groups using immediate release (IR) and extended release (XR) quetiapine. The case group was further split into high-dose (> 200 mg/day) and low-dose (≤ 200 mg/day) lamotrigine users. Quetiapine concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio and metabolite-to-parent ratio (MPR) were compared between the control group and dose-separated case groups using ANOVA test and t-tests. RESULTS: In total, 406 patients were included. The mean C/D ratio of IR quetiapine was 46% lower in the high-dose lamotrigine group compared with the control group (P < 0.001), while no interaction effect was present in the low dose lamotrigine group (P = 0.7). Regardless of lamotrigine dose, there was no difference in quetiapine C/D ratio for patients using the XR formulation (P = 0.4). The quetiapine MPR was unaffected regardless of formulation and lamotrigine dose (P ≥ 0.06). CONCLUSION: The effect of lamotrigine in reducing quetiapine concentration is only significant for patients using quetiapine IR tablets who are treated with lamotrigine doses > 200 mg/day. Because of high variability in the interaction effect, TDM of quetiapine should be recommended during co-prescription of high-dose lamotrigine.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Interactions , Lamotrigine , Quetiapine Fumarate , Tablets , Humans , Lamotrigine/pharmacokinetics , Lamotrigine/administration & dosage , Lamotrigine/blood , Lamotrigine/therapeutic use , Quetiapine Fumarate/pharmacokinetics , Quetiapine Fumarate/administration & dosage , Quetiapine Fumarate/blood , Male , Female , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/blood , Middle Aged , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Drug Monitoring/methods , Triazines/pharmacokinetics , Triazines/blood , Triazines/administration & dosage , AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antipsychotics, including risperidone (RIS), are frequently indicated for various autism spectrum disorder (ASD) manifestations; however, "actionable" PGx testing in psychiatry regarding antipsychotic dosing and selection has limited applications in routine clinical practice because of the lack of standard guidelines, mostly due to the inconsistency and scarcity of genetic variant data. The current study is aimed at examining the association of RIS effectiveness, according to ABC-CV and CGI indexes, with relevant pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) genes. METHODS: Eighty-nine ASD children who received a consistent RIS-based regimen for at least 8 weeks were included. The Axiom PharmacoFocus Array technique was employed to generate accurate star allele-predicted phenotypes of 3 PK genes (CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP2D6). Genotype calls for 5 candidate PD receptor genes (DRD1, DRD2, DRD3, HTR2C, and HTR2A) were obtained and reported as wild type, heterozygous, or homozygous for 11 variants. RESULTS: Based on the ABC total score, 42 (47.2%) children were classified as responders, while 47 (52.8%) were classified as nonresponders. Multivariate logistic regression analyses, adjusted for nongenetic factors, suggested nonsignificant impacts of the star allele-predicted phenotypes of all 3 PK genes on improvement in ASD symptoms or CGI scores. However, significant positive or negative associations of certain PD variants involved in dopaminergic and serotonergic pathways were observed with specific ASD core and noncore symptom subdomains. Our significant polymorphism findings, mainly those in DRD2 (rs1800497, rs1799978, and rs2734841), HTR2C (rs3813929), and HTR2A (rs6311), were largely consistent with earlier findings (predictors of RIS effectiveness in adult schizophrenia patients), confirming their validity for identifying ASD children with a greater likelihood of core symptom improvement compared to noncarriers/wild types. Other novel findings of this study, such as significant improvements in DRD3 rs167771 carriers, particularly in ABC total and lethargy/social withdrawal scores, and DRD1 rs1875964 homozygotes and DRD2 rs1079598 wild types in stereotypic behavior, warrant further verification in biochemical and clinical studies to confirm their feasibility for inclusion in a PGx panel. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we provide evidence of potential genetic markers involved in clinical response variability to RIS therapy in ASD children. However, replication in prospective samples with greater ethnic diversity and sample sizes is necessary.