Methylphenidate and Other Pharmacologic Treatments for Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease.

Apathy is a common and important yet often ignored neuropsychiatric symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, used to treat AD, appear ineffective against apathy. A meta-analysis of 4 randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) found that psychostimulants significantly attenuated apathy ratings in AD. However, the pooled sample size in this meta-analysis was just 156, and one of the trials was a 2-week crossover study with a large effect. A large RCT (n = 200) has now been published. This study found that methylphenidate (MPH; 20 mg/d) was superior to placebo in the attenuation of apathy scores in patients with possible or probable, mild to moderate AD; the advantage was evident by the end of the second month of treatment and remained evident to the end of 6 months. The effect size at 6 months was small (Cohen d = 0.37). In this RCT, disappointingly, MPH was not superior to placebo on secondary outcomes, including informant-rated apathy, dependence, activities of daily living, quality of life, and neurocognitive performance; caregiver burden was not formally studied. Speculatively, the psychosocial intervention provided to all participants in this RCT may have boosted response in the placebo group, thereby attenuating differences in outcomes between the MPH and placebo groups. A reasonable conclusion is that whereas MPH may attenuate the severity of apathy in patients with AD across as long as 6 months, the absence of improvements in measures of dependence, activities of daily living, and quality of life suggest that this effect of MPH on apathy may not be clinically significant. An unanswered question is whether the benefits of MPH may be clinically significant in real world practice settings in which the delivery of behavioral interventions is not feasible.

Pharmacological Management of Apathy in Dementia.

Apathy is a highly prevalent symptom of dementia. Despite its association with faster cognitive and functional decline, decreased quality of life and increased mortality, no therapies are currently approved to treat apathy. The objective of this review was to summarize the drugs that have been studied for apathy treatment in patients with dementia (specifically Alzheimer's disease [AD], Huntington's disease [HD] and Parkinson's disease [PD] dementia; dementia with Lewy bodies [DLB]; vascular dementia [VaD]; and frontotemporal dementia [FTD]) based on their putative mechanisms of action. A search for relevant studies was performed using ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that were available in English and included at least one drug intervention and an apathy measure scale. A total of 52 studies that included patients with AD (n = 33 studies), PD (n = 5), HD (n = 1), DLB (n = 1), FTD (n = 3), VaD (n = 1), VaD and AD (n = 4), VaD and mixed dementia (n = 1), and AD, VaD and mixed dementia (n = 3) were eligible for inclusion. These studies showed that methylphenidate, olanzapine, cholinesterase inhibitors, choline alphoscerate, citalopram, memantine, and mibampator are the only beneficial drugs in AD-related apathy. For PD-related apathy, only methylphenidate, rotigotine and rivastigmine showed benefits. Regarding FTD- and DLB-related apathy, initial studies with agomelatine and rivastigmine showed benefits, respectively. As for HD- and only-VaD-related apathy, no drugs demonstrated benefits. With regards to mixed populations, memantine, galantamine and gingko biloba showed effects on apathy in the AD plus VaD populations and nimodipine in the VaD plus mixed dementia populations. Of the drugs with positive results, some are already prescribed to patients with dementia to target other symptoms, some have characteristics-such as medical contraindications (e.g., cardiovascular) and adverse effects (e.g., gastrointestinal disturbances)-that limit their clinical use and some require further study. Future studies should investigate apathy as a primary outcome, making use of appropriate sample sizes and study durations to ensure durability of results. There should also be a consensus on using scales with high test/retest and interrater reliabilities to limit the inconsistencies between clinical trials. In conclusion, there are currently no US FDA-approved drugs that target apathy in dementia, so there is an ongoing need for the development of such drugs.

Effect of Methylphenidate on Apathy in Patients With Alzheimer Disease: The ADMET 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Apathy, characterized by diminished will or initiative and one of the most prevalent neuropsychiatric symptoms in individuals with Alzheimer disease, is associated with significant caregiver burden, excess disability, increased medical costs, and mortality. Objective: To measure whether methylphenidate compared with placebo decreases the severity of apathy in individuals with Alzheimer disease. Design, Setting, and participants: This multicenter randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted from August 2016 to July 2020 in 9 US clinics and 1 Canadian clinic specializing in dementia care. A total of 307 potential participants were screened. Of those, 52 did not pass screening and 55 were not eligible. Participants with Alzheimer disease, mild to moderate cognitive impairment, and frequent and/or severe apathy as measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) were included. Interventions: Ten milligrams of methylphenidate, twice daily, vs matching placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coprimary outcomes included (1) change from baseline to 6 months in the NPI apathy subscale or (2) improved rating on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change. Other outcomes include safety, change in cognition, and quality of life. Results: Of 200 participants, 99 were assigned to methylphenidate and 101 to placebo. The median (interquartile range) age of study participants was 76 (71-81) years; 68 (34%) were female and 131 (66%) were male. A larger decrease was found from baseline to 6 months in the NPI apathy score in those receiving methylphenidate compared with placebo (mean difference, -1.25; 95% CI, -2.03 to -0.47; P = .002). The largest decrease in the NPI apathy score was observed in the first 100 days, with a significant hazard ratio for the proportion of participants with no apathy symptoms receiving methylphenidate compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.19-3.91; P = .01). At 6 months, the odds ratio of having an improved rating on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change for methylphenidate compared with placebo was 1.90 (95% CI, 0.95-3.84; P = .07). The difference in mean change from baseline to 6 months estimated using a longitudinal model was 1.43 (95% CI, 1.00-2.04; P = .048). Cognitive measures and quality of life were not significantly different between groups. Of the 17 serious adverse events that occurred during the study, none were related to the study drug. No significant differences in the safety profile were noted between treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found methylphenidate to be a safe and efficacious medication to use in the treatment of apathy in Alzheimer disease. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02346201.

S-Equol mitigates motivational deficits and dysregulation associated with HIV-1.

Motivational deficits (e.g., apathy) and dysregulation (e.g., addiction) in HIV-1 seropositive individuals, despite treatment with combination antiretroviral therapy, necessitates the development of innovative adjunctive therapeutics. S-Equol (SE), a selective estrogen receptor ß agonist, has been implicated as a neuroprotective and/or neurorestorative therapeutic for HIV-1 associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND); its therapeutic utility for motivational alterations, however, has yet to be systematically evaluated. Thus, HIV-1 transgenic (Tg) and control animals were treated with either a daily oral dose of SE (0.2 mg) or vehicle and assessed in a series of tasks to evaluate goal-directed and drug-seeking behavior. First, at the genotypic level, motivational deficits in HIV-1 Tg rats treated with vehicle were characterized by a diminished reinforcing efficacy of, and sensitivity to, sucrose. Motivational dysregulation was evidenced by enhanced drug-seeking for cocaine relative to control animals treated with vehicle. Second, treatment with SE ameliorated both motivational deficits and dysregulation in HIV-1 Tg rats. Following a history of cocaine self-administration, HIV-1 Tg animals treated with vehicle exhibited lower levels of dendritic branching and a shift towards longer dendritic spines with decreased head diameter. Treatment with SE, however, led to long-term enhancements in dendritic spine morphology in HIV-1 Tg animals supporting a potential underlying basis by which SE exerts its therapeutic effects. Taken together, SE restored motivated behavior in the HIV-1 Tg rat, expanding the potential clinical utility of SE to include both neurocognitive and affective alterations.

Chronic SSRI treatment reverses HIV-1 protein-mediated synaptodendritic damage.

HIV-1 infection affects approximately 37 million individuals, and approximately 50% of seropositive individuals will develop symptoms of clinical depression and/or apathy. Dysfunctions of both serotonergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission have been implicated in the pathogenesis of motivational alterations. The present study evaluated the efficacy of a SSRI (escitalopram) in the HIV-1 transgenic (Tg) rat. Behavioral, neurochemical, and neuroanatomical outcomes with respect to HIV-1 and sex were evaluated to determine the efficacy of chronic escitalopram treatment. Escitalopram treatment restored function in each of the behavioral tasks that were sensitive to HIV-1-induced impairments. Further, escitalopram treatment restored HIV-1-mediated synaptodendritic damage in the nucleus accumbens; treatment with escitalopram significantly increased dendritic proliferation in HIV-1 Tg rats. However, restoration did not consistently occur with the neurochemical analysis in the HIV-1 rat. Taken together, these results suggest a role for SSRI therapies in repairing long-term HIV-1 protein-mediated neuronal damage and restoring function.

Síndrome amotivacional en consumidores crónicos de marihuana. Una revisión narrativa para la aproximación al concepto / Amotivational syndrome in chronic marijuana users. A narrative review to approach the concept

Introducción: Durante los últimos sesenta años se ha construido evidencia sobre los efectos adversos relacionados con el consumo crónico de cannabis. Los problemas de memoria y concentración, el riesgo de esquizofrenia en sujetos predispuestos y el síndrome amotivacional han sido referenciados. Con los primeros al parecer no hay muchas dudas, pero en relación con el último, existe controversia. Objetivo: revisar la evidencia científica existente sobre el síndrome amotivacional. Material y Métodos: La revisión se realizó mediante una búsqueda en bases de datos académicas, se tomaron en cuenta las publicaciones que estuvieran relacionadas con trastornos mentales relacionados con el consumo crónico de marihuana en los que se hacía referencia al síndrome amotivacional que cumplieran con criterios de calidad de los artículos apegados a estándares internacionales. Desarrollo: Se incluyó un total de 31 artículos, de los cuales 16 incluían la definición de síndrome amotivacional. Una vez integradas todas las fuentes, se determinó organizar la evidencia encontrada en 15 factores: apatía; desinterés; pasividad; indiferencia; demora en la realización de tareas; pereza; presentismo; desgano para actividades prolongadas que requieran atención o tenacidad; abandono del cuidado personal; desinterés sexual; disminución de los reflejos; autoeficacia disminuida; deterioro de las habilidades comunicativas; retraimiento social y afecto no alterado. Conclusiones: A partir de los hallazgos, se sugiere que el síndrome amotivacional es una constelación de síntomas y/o signos relacionados, lo que podría constituir una morbilidad propia del consumo crónico de cannabis, se espera que en el futuro se desarrollen investigaciones que prueben o rechacen su existencia(AU)

Introduction: Over the past sixty years, evidence for the adverse effects of chronic cannabis use has been demonstrated. Memory and concentration problems, the risk of schizophrenia in predisposed subjects, and amotivational syndrome have been referenced. There is not much doubt in relation to the first effect mentioned, but there is controversy around the last. Objective: To review the existing scientific evidence for the amotivational syndrome. Material and Methods: The review was conducted through academic database searching. The publications related to mental disorders associated with the chronic marijuana use, which referred to amotivational syndrome that fulfilled the criteria for articles attached to international standards, were taken into account. Results: A total of 31 articles were included. Of them, 16 presented the definition of amotivational syndrome. Once all the sources were integrated, the evidence found in 15 factors was organized. These factors included: apathy; disinterest; passivity; indifference; delay to perform tasks; sloth; presentism; reluctance to do prolonged activities that require attention or tenacity; abandonment of personal care; sexual disinterest; decreased reflexes; decreased self-efficacy; impairment in communication skills; social withdrawal, and unaltered affection. Conclusions: Based on these findings, we suggest that the amotivational syndrome is a constellation of symptoms and / or related signs which could constitute a typical morbidity caused by chronic cannabis use, so we expect that future research will be developed to demonstrate or discard their existence(AU)

Measuring Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease in the Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET 2): A Comparison of Instruments.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic criteria for apathy have been published but have yet to be evaluated in the context of clinical trials. The Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET 2) operationalized the diagnostic criteria for apathy (DCA) into a clinician-rated questionnaire informed by interviews with the patient and caregiver. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to compare the classification of apathy using the DCA with that using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-apathy (NPI-apathy) subscale in ADMET 2. Comparisons between NPI-Apathy and Dementia Apathy Interview Rating (DAIR) scale, and DCA and DAIR were also explored. METHODS: ADMET 2 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial examining the effects of 20 mg/day methylphenidate on symptoms of apathy over 6 months in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). Participants scoring at least 4 on the NPI-Apathy were recruited. This analysis focuses on cross-sectional correlations between baseline apathy scale scores using cross-tabulation. RESULTS: Of 180 participants, the median age was 76.5 years and they were predominantly white (92.8%) and male (66.1%). The mean (±standard deviation) scores were 7.7 ± 2.4 on the NPI-apathy, and 1.9 ± 0.5 on the DAIR. Of those with NPI-defined apathy, 169 (93.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 89.3%-96.9%) met DCA diagnostic criteria. The DCA and DAIR overlapped on apathy diagnosis for 169 participants (93.9%, 95% CI 89.3%-96.9%). CONCLUSION: The measurements used for the assessment of apathy in patients with AD had a high degree of overlap with the DCA. The NPI-apathy cut-off used to determine apathy in ADMET 2 selects those likely to meet DCA criteria.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors-associated apathy syndrome: A cross sectional study.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), commonly used to treat depression, are associated with loss of motivation, anergy, and lack of curiosity often referred collectively as apathy. However, this association has not been systematically assessed using a specific rating scale for measuring apathy syndrome. Our objective was to study the association between SSRI use and apathy syndrome.We conducted a retrospective chart review of 125 patients enrolled in an outpatient psychiatry clinic. The prevalence of apathy syndrome and its clinical significance (based on standardized assessment) were compared between patients treated and not treated with SSRIs. Apathy was assessed using the Apathy Evaluation Scale-clinician version with a score ranging 18-72 with higher score for worse apathy. A score of greater than 30 is considered clinically significant apathy.Among 119 patients, the mean apathy scores were significantly higher in those treated with SSRIs compared to those not treated with SSRIs (42.5 ±â€Š9.2 vs 31.3 ±â€Š6, P < .0001). The SSRI group also had a significantly higher percentage of patients with clinically significant apathy (92% vs 61%, P < .0001). Use of all SSRIs was associated with the presence of apathy. Apathy was seen in all mental health diagnostic categories with highest Apathy evaluation scale-clinician version scores in those with dementia.SSRI use may be associated with higher rates of apathy syndrome. Clinicians should specifically inquire about iatrogenic apathy syndrome when evaluating patients on an SSRI if there is suspicion of loss of motivation. Limitations of this study included retrospective nature of this study, and that majority of the sample was males. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate information regarding the prevalence, etiology, and treatment response for SSRI-associated apathy syndrome.

The Efficacy of Sertraline, Escitalopram, and Nicergoline in the Treatment of Depression and Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease: The Okayama Depression and Apathy Project (ODAP).

BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia such as depression and apathy in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are associated with a lower quality of life. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the efficacy of two antidepressants and one antipathy drug in the treatment of depression and apathy in AD patients. METHODS: In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of sertraline (n = 11; average dose = 31.8 mg), escitalopram (n = 13; average dose = 7.3 mg), and nicergoline (n = 9; average dose = 14.5 mg) in treating depression and apathy over a period of 3 months (M).The 33 patients with AD demonstrated high Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) (>5) or a high Apathy Scale (AS) (>16) scores. RESULTS: The patients receiving escitalopram treatment showed a significant improvement in GDS score from baseline (8.2±3.5) to 3 M (5.7±2.6, p = 0.04), and the patients receiving sertraline treatment showed a significant improvement in AS score from baseline (20.8±5.2) to 3 M (16.8±6.1, p = 0.05); however, no significant changes were noted in patients receiving nicergoline. CONCLUSION: These results provide novel information on the efficacy of sertraline and escitalopram in the treatment of apathy and depression, respectively, in patients with AD.

Bupropion for the Treatment of Apathy in Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Apathy is a frequent neuropsychiatric symptom in dementia of Alzheimer type and negatively affects the disease course and patients' and caregivers' quality of life. Effective treatment options are needed. Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of the dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor bupropion in the treatment of apathy in patients with dementia of Alzheimer type. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted in a psychiatric and neurological outpatient setting between July 2010 and July 2014 in Germany. Patients with mild-to-moderate dementia of Alzheimer type and clinically relevant apathy were included. Patients with additional clinically relevant depressed mood were excluded. Data analyses were performed between August 2018 and August 2019. Interventions: Patients received either bupropion or placebo (150 mg for 4 weeks plus 300 mg for 8 weeks). In case of intolerability of 300 mg, patients continued to receive 150 mg throughout the study. Main Outcomes and Measures: Change on the Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinician Version (AES-C) (score range, 18-72 points) between baseline and week 12 was the primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters included measures of neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognition, activities of daily living, and quality of life. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Results: A total of 108 patients (mean [SD] age, 74.8 [5.9] years; 67 men [62%]) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, with 54 randomized to receive bupropion and 54 randomized to receive placebo. The baseline AES-C score was comparable between the bupropion group and the placebo group (mean [SD], 52.2 [8.7] vs 50.4 [8.2]). After controlling for the baseline AES-C score, site, and comedication with donepezil or galantamine, the mean change in the AES-C score between the bupropion and placebo groups was not statistically significant (mean change, 2.22; 95% CI, -0.47 to 4.91; P = .11). Results on secondary outcomes showed statistically significant differences between bupropion and placebo in terms of total neuropsychiatric symptoms (mean change, 5.52; 95% CI, 2.00 to 9.04; P = .003) and health-related quality of life (uncorrected for multiple comparisons; mean change, -1.66; 95% CI, -3.01 to -0.31; P = .02) with greater improvement in the placebo group. No statistically significant changes between groups were found for activities of daily living (mean change, -2.92; 95% CI, -5.89 to 0.06; P = .05) and cognition (mean change, -0.27; 95% CI, -3.26 to 2.73; P = .86). The numbers of adverse events (bupropion group, 39 patients [72.2%]; placebo group, 33 patients [61.1%]) and serious adverse events (bupropion group, 5 patients [9.3%]; placebo group, 2 patients [3.7%]) were comparable between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Although it is safe, bupropion was not superior to placebo for the treatment of apathy in patients with dementia of Alzheimer type in the absence of clinically relevant depressed mood. Trial Registration: EU Clinical Trials Register Identifier: 2007-005352-17.

Identifying and responding to fatigue and apathy in Parkinson's disease: a review of current practice.

Introduction: Fatigue and apathy are two key non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD), with documented negative impact on Quality of life (QoL) and a frequent burden for caregivers.Areas covered: In this review, the authors comment on the latest pathophysiology, clinical phenomenology, the most frequently used scales for fatigue and apathy in PD with a focus on available therapeutic strategies.Expert opinion:The identification of fatigue and apathy in PD is mainly hampered by the lack of a clear consensus on these subjective symptoms. The pathophysiological processes remain unclear, and the large variation in prevalence is likely due to the heterogeneous PD populations and the lack of an enriched cohort of people with fatigue and/or apathy as main symptoms. Treatment strategies, and especially level 1 evidence for specific treatments for fatigue and apathy in PD, remain scarce. The best evidence to date is doxepin, rasagiline and levodopa infusion therapy (for fatigue), and rivastigmine (for apathy). Further efforts should be made to properly identify these two major symptoms in PD, to correctly detect those who may benefit most from tailored personalized interventions.

Apathy symptoms induced by low-dose venlafaxine: Two cases.

Recent guidelines regarding pharmacological interventions for major depressive disorder (MDD) recommend first using serotonin (5HT) selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or 5HT and norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Although SSRIs and SNRIs are effective and well-tolerated, apathy occurs as an adverse effect in some SSRIs-treated patients. Because apathy would be associated with the 5HT pathway, if a patient exhibits apathy symptoms under SSRIs treatment, a clinical strategy has been to change the SSRIs to treatment with an SNRIs. Here, I report two cases in which low-dose venlafaxine, an SNRIs, induced apathy symptoms.

Efficacy and Safety of Psychostimulants for Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Several reports of the effectiveness of the use of psychostimulants for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are available. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted including double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Outcomes were the improvement of apathy scales score (primary), mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score, activities of daily living scale score, Zarit burden interview score, all-cause discontinuation, discontinuation due to adverse events, and incidence of at least 1 adverse event. RESULTS: Three methylphenidate studies and 1 modafinil study were identified (n=156). Results from combined psychostimulants were superior to placebo in the improvement of apathy scales score (standardized mean differences [SMD]=-0.63 (-1.22, -0.04), p=0.04, all studies) and the MMSE score (SMD=-0.58 (-1.14, -0.02), p=0.04, 3 methylphenidate studies). The modafinil study was excluded from the meta-analysis for the improvement of apathy scales score; therefore, the effect size increased (SMD=-0.82 (-1.43, -0.20), p=0.009). However, no significant differences were observed in terms of other outcomes, including safety outcomes between the treatment groups. DISCUSSION: Methylphenidate would be effective in treating apathy and cognitive impairment in AD patients.

Effects of Roluperidone (MIN-101) on two dimensions of the negative symptoms factor score: Reduced emotional experience and reduced emotional expression.

BACKGROUND: Recent research has suggested that negative symptoms (NS) can be considered in terms of two different dimensions: reduced expression (expressive deficit) and reduced experience (experiential deficit). Roluperidone, a compound with high affinities for 5 HT2A and sigma2 receptors, has previously shown superiority over placebo on improving NS in a prospective study in patients with schizophrenia. The objective here is to explore the effect of roluperidone compared to placebo, on the 2 domains of the Negative Symptoms. METHODS: This was a multi-national Phase 2b trial that enrolled 244 symptomatically stable patients with schizophrenia who had baseline scores ≥20 on the NS subscale of the PANSS. Patients were randomized to daily monotherapy with roluperidone 32 mg, roluperidone 64 mg, or placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio. All enrolled patients were Caucasian, and 137 (56%) were male. The 3 treatment groups were balanced on all demographic and illness-related baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Both doses of roluperidone were superior to placebo on both domains: Reduced Experience (p ≤ .006 for the 32 mg; p ≤ .001 for the 64 mg) with persistent superiority from Week 2 for the 64 mg dose and Week 8 for the 32 mg dose; Reduced Expression (p ≤ .003 for 32 mg; p ≤ .001 for 64 mg) with similar persistence. IMPLICATIONS: Both doses of roluperidone previously improved PANSS negative symptoms in general and demonstrated tolerability in stable schizophrenia patients. The post hoc analysis reported here found the drug to work on both the reduced emotional experience and reduced emotional expression sub-scales empirically derived from the PANSS.

Efficacy of amantadine on behavioural problems due to acquired brain injury: A systematic review.

Objectives: To systematically review literature on efficacy of amantadine on behavior (irritability/aggression/agitation, emotional lability, apathy, impairment of executive functioning), participation, quality-of-life (QoL), and safety, in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). Amantadine is widely used clinically, so comprehensive information on efficacy, participation, QoL and safety is relevant. Methods: We used PRISMA Guidelines. We searched PubMed/EMBASE/CINAHL (last search 28-8-2018) Two independent reviewers performed selection and data-extraction. Quality of studies was assessed, using CONSORT and Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (QATFQS). Results: Eleven out of 500 studies were included. Of five RCTs, two reported significant effects on irritability/aggression, and one no effect. One RCT on cognition no effect. One prospective cohort study showed a significant effect on executive functioning. One retrospective study was inconclusive. One single-case experimental design (SCED) study reported significant effect on apathy and three case-reports indicated effects on behavior. QoL and societal participation were not measured. No safety issues emerged. Conclusion: Amantadine may be efficacious on irritability and aggression after ABI. Amantadine is a safe drug in the presence of adequate creatinine clearance. Future studies should use designs, suitable for the heterogeneous ABI population, like randomized SCEDs, and should include the effect on societal participation and QoL.

Caffeine and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with dementia: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The consumption of caffeine has well known effects on the behavior and sleep of healthy adults. Behavioral symptoms and sleeping difficulties are common in patients with dementia which may be affected by caffeine consumption. This systematic review examines the association between caffeine intake and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with dementia. METHODS: In January 2019 an extensive search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), Embase, Emcare, Cochrane, PsychInfo, Web of Science and gray literature. Studies were included when they: i) investigated patients diagnosed with dementia, ii) reported neuropsychiatric symptoms, iii) used caffeine or coffee consumption as an intervention, and iv) reported associations between caffeine or coffee consumption and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Studies were excluded when they also included participants without a diagnosis of dementia, or presented a review or expert opinion. Two reviewers independently rated the studies and reached consensus on the appraisal. RESULTS: Of the seven studies eligible for this review, four reported on sleeping difficulties and five on behavioral symptoms. There was no consistent effect of caffeine administration on neuropsychiatric symptoms: e.g., both high caffeine consumption and eliminating caffeine were associated with less apathy, the total Neuropsychiatric Inventory (Nursing Home) decreased after both coffee therapy and after eliminating caffeine, and both caffeine consumption and eliminating caffeine improved sleep. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that caffeine can either induce or reduce neuropsychiatric symptoms in individual patients with dementia. Therefore, in these patients, caffeine consumption requires a prudent individualized approach and further research on the effects of caffeine on individual neuropsychiatric symptoms is required.

Pharmacological treatment of apathy in Lewy body disorders: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: There are no approved treatments for apathy, a frequent and incapacitating symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). We reviewed the literature on the pharmacological treatment of apathy in PD and DLB to inform practice and future research. METHOD: We searched PubMed and PsycINFO using the terms "apathy", "treatment", and "Parkinson" or "Lewy body (bodies)." The results were filtered for "clinical trials" and "case reports." We included articles if apathy was measured as an outcome measure, before and after treatment. References of included articles were also reviewed. RESULTS: The PD search identified 19 articles: 13 randomized control trials (RCTs), 4 open-label studies, 1 case series, and 1 case report. Apathy was the primary outcome in 11 out of 19 studies. A decrease in apathy ratings was seen in 14 of the 19 studies. Of these 14 studies, 9 investigated medications with some dopaminergic effect. Three investigated acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) and found benefit in improving apathy. The DLB search identified 4 articles: 1 RCT, 2 open-label studies, and 1 case series. All 4 studies demonstrated decreased apathy and investigated AChEIs. CONCLUSIONS: We identified 23 studies that assessed the pharmacological treatment of apathy. In PD, agents with dopaminergic activity were the most studied and appeared to have the most benefit. AChEIs also appeared to have benefit in both PD and DLB but were less studied. Future studies of apathy treatment would benefit from larger samples and standardized assessments of apathy to define study populations and endpoints.