Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
2.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 90(1): 127-136, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30825536

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Few large Western series examine risk factors for recurrence after endoscopic resection (ER) of large (≥20 mm) colorectal laterally spreading tumors. Recurrence beyond initial surveillance is seldom reported, and differences between residual/recurrent adenoma and late recurrence are not scrutinized. We report the incidence of recurrence at successive surveillance intervals, identify risk factors for recurrent/residual adenoma and late recurrence, and describe the outcomes of ER of recurrent adenomas. METHODS: Recurrence was calculated for successive surveillance periods after colorectal ER. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for recurrent/residual adenoma and late recurrence (≥12 months). RESULTS: Six hundred twenty colorectal ERs were performed, and 456 eligible patients (98%) had completed 3- to 6-month surveillance. Residual/recurrent adenoma (3-6 months) was detected in 8.3%, at 12 months in 6.1%, between 24 and 36 months in 6.4%, and after 36 months in 13.5%. Independent risk factors for residual/recurrent adenoma were piecemeal resection (odds ratio [OR], 13.0; P = .01), adjunctive argon plasma coagulation (OR, 2.4; P = .01), and lesion occupying ≥75% of the luminal circumference (OR, 5.6; P < .001) and for late recurrence were lesion size >60 mm (OR, 6.3; P < .001) and piecemeal resection (OR, 4.4; P = .04). Of 66 patients with recurrence, 5 required surgery, 8 left the treatment pathway, 20 are still receiving ER or surveillance, and 33 had ER with normal subsequent surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence occurs at successive periods of surveillance after ER even beyond 3 years. Aside from piecemeal resection, risk factors for residual/recurrent adenoma and late recurrence are different. Recurrence can be challenging to treat, but surgery is rarely required.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Adenoma/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Argon Plasma Coagulation/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Neoplasm, Residual , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tumor Burden , United Kingdom
3.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi ; 35(6): 456-8, 2013 Jun.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24119907

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) therapy for early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. METHODS: One-hundred and seventy-one cases with early esophageal cancer (intramucosal carcinoma) and precancerous lesions were treated by APC from 1994 to 2005, and all the cases were followed up. One-hundred and sixty-eight (98.2%) cases were follow-up by endoscopic examination for several times. On average, each patient was endoscopically examined 2.8 times. The follow-up rate was 100%. RESULTS: The precancerous lesion group had 160 patients. They were followed up for 5 years. 11 patients died of causes unrelated to cancer. The lesions developed into esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in five patients ( 2 died and 3 underwent esophagectomy). The remaining 144 cases survived without cancer. In this group, the esophageal cancer incidence rate is only 3.1% (5/160). The early cancer (i.e. intramucosal cancer) group had 11 patients. During the 5-year follow-up period, two patients died of causes unrelated to cancer,six patients had recurrence (4 patients died and 2 patients underwent esophagectomy), and only 3 patients survived without cancer. Therefore, the 5-year survival rate was only 27.3% (3/11). CONCLUSIONS: The APC therapy for precancerous lesions of the esophagus is effective and successful. Indications should be carefully considered when treating early esophageal cancer such as intramucosal carcinoma by APC therapy.


Subject(s)
Argon Plasma Coagulation/methods , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Argon Plasma Coagulation/statistics & numerical data , Endoscopy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Esophagoscopy , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Precancerous Conditions/surgery , Survival Rate
4.
World J Gastroenterol ; 17(21): 2652-7, 2011 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21677835

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic removal and trimming of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS). METHODS: All SEMS had been placed for distal biliary strictures. Twenty-seven endoscopic procedures were performed in 19 patients in whom SEMS (one uncovered and 18 covered) removal had been attempted, and 8 patients in whom stent trimming using argon plasma coagulation (APC) had been attempted at Tokyo Medical University Hospital. The APC settings were: voltage 60-80 W and gas flow at 1.5 L/min. RESULTS: The mean stent indwelling period for all patients in whom stent removal had been attempted was 113.7 ± 77.6 d (range, 8-280 d). Of the 19 patients in whom removal of the SEMS had been attempted, the procedure was successful in 14 (73.7%) without procedure-related adverse events. The indwelling period in the stent removable group was shorter than that in the unremovable group (94.9 ± 71.5 d vs 166.2 ± 76.2 d, P = 0.08). Stent trimming was successful for all patients with one minor adverse event consisting of self-limited hemorrhage. Trimming time ranged from 11 to 16 min. CONCLUSION: Although further investigations on larger numbers of cases are necessary to accumulate evidence, the present data suggested that stent removal and stent trimming is feasible and effective for stent-related complications.


Subject(s)
Argon Plasma Coagulation/statistics & numerical data , Biliary Tract/pathology , Device Removal , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Stents , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bile Ducts/pathology , Bile Ducts/surgery , Constriction, Pathologic/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
5.
Rev. AMRIGS ; 48(2): 77-81, abr.-jun. 2004. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-876417

ABSTRACT

Introdução e objetivos: A eletrocoagulação com argônio (APC) é um método térmico de não-contato que pode ser utilizado como alternativa ao laser em endoscopia. Um amplo espectro de indicações têm sido propostas para tratamento através de APC, desde a introdução do uso em endoscopia, em 1991. O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar a eficácia do uso do APC na hemostasia endoscópica de lesões sangrantes do esôfago, estômago, duodeno, cólon e reto. Metodologia: Um total de 22 pacientes consecutivos (14M/8F, média de idade 66,7 anos) foram submetidos ao tratamento com APC entre 1998 e fevereiro de 2002. As causas de sangramento incluíam retite actínica (12 pacientes), ectasia vascular do antro gástrico (GAVE) ­ watermelon stomach (6 pacientes), angiodisplasias de esôfago, estômago e cólon (2 pacientes), gastrite actínica (1 paciente) e síndrome de Osler-Weber-Rendu (1 paciente). Resultados: Um total de 49 sessões foram realizadas (média de 2,2 sessões por paciente). Sucesso no tratamento endoscópico foi obtido em 18 pacientes (85,8%). Complicações foram observadas em 3 pacientes: 2 apresentaram dor local após as sessões de APC e um paciente desenvolveu estenose retal tratada com sucesso em uma sessão de dilatação endoscópica. Não houve mortalidade relacionada ao método. Conclusões: APC é um método seguro, efetivo, de relativo baixo custo e boa aceitação pelos pacientes para o tratamento de lesões sangrantes do trato gastrointestinal. Deve, portanto, ser considerado método de primeira escolha no tratamento dessas afecções (AU)


Background and aims: Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is an innovative non-touch electrocoagulation technique. A broad spectrum of indications has been proposed for APC since its introduction into endoscopy in 1991. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of utilizing APC in the endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding lesions of the esophagus, stomach, duodenun, colon and rectum. Methodology: A total of 22 consecutive patients (14M/ 8 F, mean age 66.7 years) underwent APC treatment between 1998 and february 2002. Causes of bleeding included radiation colitis (12 patients), gastric antral vascular ectasia ­ watermelon stomach (6 patients), esophagus,stomach and colon angiodysplasia (2 patients), radiation gastritis (1 patient) and Osler-Weber-Rendu Syndrome (1 patient). Results: A total of 49 sessions were performed (mean 2.2 sessions / patient). Succesful endoscopic APC treatment was achieved in 18 patients (85,8%). Complications were observed in 2 patients that referred local pain after therapy and 1 patient that developed a rectal stenosis succesfully reversed in one session of endoscopic dilation. No mortality related to APC was observed. Conclusions: APC is a safe, effective, and relative low-cost hemostatic modality for bleeding vascular lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, APC should be considered as a first-line therapy for these conditions (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Argon Plasma Coagulation/statistics & numerical data , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/surgery , Proctitis/surgery , Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Angiodysplasia/surgery , Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia/surgery , Gastritis/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL