ABSTRACT
Both biphasic dissolution and simultaneous dissolution-permeation (D-P) systems have great potential to improve the in vitro-in vivo correlation compared to simple dissolution assays, but the assay conditions, and the evaluation methods still need to be refined in order to effectively use these apparatuses in drug development. Therefore, this comprehensive study aimed to compare the predictive accuracy of small-volume (16-20 mL) D-P system and small-volume (40-80 mL) biphasic dissolution apparatus in bioequivalence prediction of five aripiprazole (ARP) containing marketed drug products. Assay conditions, specifically dose dependence were studied to overcome the limitations of both small-scale systems. In case of biphasic dissolution the in vivo maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) prediction greatly improved with the dose reduction of ARP, while in case of the D-P setup the use of whole tablet gave just as accurate prediction as the scaled dose. With the dose reduction strategy both equipment was able to reach 100 % accuracy in bioequivalence prediction for Cmax ratio. In case of the in vivo area under the curve (AUC) prediction the predictive accuracy for the AUC ratio was not dependent on the dose, and both apparatus had a 100 % accuracy predicting bioequivalence based on AUC results. This paper presents for the first time that not only selected parameters of flux assays (like permeability, initial flux, AUC value) were used as an input parameter of a mechanistic model (gastrointestinal unified theory) to predict absorption rate but the whole in vitro flux profile was used. All fraction absorbed values estimated by Predictor Software fell within the ±15 % acceptance range during the comparison with the in vivo data.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Aripiprazole , Solubility , Therapeutic Equivalency , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Aripiprazole/blood , Aripiprazole/chemistry , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/blood , Antipsychotic Agents/chemistry , Permeability , Drug Liberation , Humans , Area Under Curve , TabletsABSTRACT
A ready-to-use (RTU) long-acting injectable (LAI) formulation of aripiprazole monohydrate for administration once every 2 months, available in 960 mg (Ari 2MRTU 960) or 720 mg doses, has been developed for the treatment of schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder. A previously developed and validated population pharmacokinetic model for characterizing aripiprazole plasma concentrations following administration of oral aripiprazole or aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) intramuscular injection was expanded to include the RTU LAI formulation of aripiprazole (Ari RTU LAI). Overall, 8899 aripiprazole pharmacokinetic samples from 1191 adults from 10 clinical trials were included in the final combined analysis data set. Aripiprazole plasma concentration-time profiles were simulated for various Ari RTU LAI initiation and maintenance scenarios in 1000 virtual patients. Diagnostic plots demonstrated that the final population pharmacokinetic model, which incorporated data for oral aripiprazole, AOM, and Ari RTU LAI, adequately described aripiprazole concentrations following Ari RTU LAI administration. Absorption of Ari RTU LAI was modeled by a parallel zero-order and lagged first-order process. Simulations across multiple scenarios were performed to inform dosing recommendations, including various treatment initiation regimens for a 2-monthly formulation of Ari RTU LAI in patients with or without prior stabilization on oral aripiprazole, and for patients switching from AOM. Additional simulations accounted for missed/delayed doses, cytochrome (CYP) 2D6 metabolizer status, and concomitant use of CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 inhibitors. Overall, simulations across a variety of scenarios demonstrated an Ari RTU LAI pharmacokinetic exposure profile that was comparable to AOM, with a longer dosing interval.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Aripiprazole , Bipolar Disorder , Computer Simulation , Delayed-Action Preparations , Models, Biological , Schizophrenia , Humans , Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Injections, Intramuscular , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Aged , Drug Administration ScheduleABSTRACT
AIMS: Aripiprazole is one of the most commonly prescribed antipsychotic drugs to children and adolescents worldwide, but it is associated with serious side-effects, including weight gain. This study assessed the population pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole and its active metabolite and investigated the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and body mass index (BMI) in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and behavioural problems. Secondary outcomes were metabolic, endocrine, extrapyramidal and cardiac side-effects and drug effectiveness. METHODS: Twenty-four children and adolescents (15 males, 9 females) aged 6-18 years were included in a 24-week prospective observational trial. Drug plasma concentrations, side-effects and drug effectiveness were measured at several time points during follow-up. Relevant pharmacokinetic covariates, including CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) genotypes, were determined. Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM®) was used for a population pharmacokinetic analysis with 92 aripiprazole and 91 dehydro-aripiprazole concentrations. Subsequently, model-based trough concentrations, maximum concentrations and 24-h area under the curves (AUCs) were analysed to predict outcomes using generalized and linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: For both aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole, one-compartment models best described the measured concentrations, with albumin and BMI as significant covariates. Of all the pharmacokinetic parameters, higher sum (aripiprazole plus dehydro-aripiprazole) trough concentrations best predicted higher BMI z-scores (P < .001) and higher Hb1Ac levels (P = .03) during follow-up. No significant association was found between sum concentrations and effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a threshold with regard to safety, which suggests that therapeutic drug monitoring of aripiprazole could potentially increase safety in children and adolescents with ASD and behavioural problems.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Autism Spectrum Disorder , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Male , Female , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Aripiprazole/adverse effects , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Autism Spectrum Disorder/drug therapy , Weight Gain , Body Mass IndexABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the relationship between plasma aripiprazole (ARI) and its metabolite dehydroaripiprazole (DARI) concentrations and prolactin (PRL) levels in Chinese children and adolescents. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study and the data were collected at Beijing HuiLongGuan Hospital, a Beijing City owned psychiatric hospital, between January 1 and December 31, 2021. Fifty-two child and adolescent inpatients (17 males, 35 females) aged 13-18 years and received ARI regardless of diagnosis were included. The steady-state ARI and DARI plasma concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The serum PRL levels were measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay. Results: The plasma concentrations of ARI, DARI, and the total of ARI and DARI were negatively correlated with serum PRL levels in female children and adolescents. Approximately 15% of child and adolescent inpatients treated with ARI exhibited subnormal PRL serum levels. Conclusions: The results suggest that in addition to regularly monitoring PRL levels, therapeutic drug monitoring for ARI and its main metabolite DARI can help to mitigate the adverse medical consequences associated with PRL reduction. Thus, clinicians should consider the ARI-induced reduction of PRL levels when prescribing ARI to child and adolescent patients, particularly among females.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Aripiprazole , Prolactin , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Cross-Sectional Studies , East Asian People , Prolactin/blood , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
To assess the bioequivalence of 2 formulations of aripiprazole orally disintegrating tablets and to monitor their safety and tolerability in Chinese subjects, a single-site, open-label, randomized, 2-preparation, single-dose, 2-period crossover design was conducted. All 60 subjects were randomly divided into the fasting group and the fed group. Blood samples were collected at scheduled times after a single oral dose of orodispersible tablets containing 10 mg of aripiprazole. In the fasting state, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of the test/reference formulation were 92.22%-100.20% for the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measured concentration (AUC0-t ), 91.73%-100.14% for the AUC from administration to infinite time (AUC0-∞ ), and 98.52%-112.52% for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ). In the fed state, AUC0-t , AUC0-∞ , and Cmax were 92.23%-100.20%, 91.73%-100.14%, and 95.91%-105.13%, respectively. The 90%CIs of the test/reference AUC ratio and Cmax ratio were within the acceptance range of 80.00%-125.00% for bioequivalence. Neither the maximum peak plasma concentration (tmax ) nor the terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 ) showed any significant difference. No serious adverse events) were encountered during the study. The test and reference formulations were bioequivalent under both fasting and fed conditions and were found to be safe and tolerated.
Subject(s)
Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Fasting/blood , Administration, Oral , Area Under Curve , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , China , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Compounding , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Tablets , Therapeutic EquivalencyABSTRACT
The hiccup (Latin singultus) is an involuntary periodic contraction of the diaphragm followed by glottic closure, which can be a rare side effect of aripiprazole. In contrast to the structurally closely related aripiprazole, brexpiprazole was not associated with this particular adverse drug reaction. Having two very similar drugs that differ in their ability to induce hiccups represents a unique opportunity to gain insight into the receptors involved in the pathophysiology of the symptom and differences in clinical effects between aripiprazole and brexpiprazole. The overlap between maneuvers used to terminate paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and those employed to terminate bouts of hiccups suggests that activation of efferent vagal fibers can be therapeutic in both instances. Recent work seems to support a pivotal role for serotonin receptors in such vagal activation. It is unlikely that a unique receptor-drug interaction could explain the different effects of the examined drugs on hiccup. The different effect is most likely the consequence of several smaller effects at more than one receptor. Brexpiprazole is a highly affine (potent) α2C antagonist and, therefore, also an indirect 5-HT1A agonist. In contrast, aripiprazole is a partial 5-HT1A agonist (weak antagonist) and an HT3 antagonist. Activation of 5-HT1A receptors enhances vagal activity while HT3 blockade reduces it. Vagus nerve activation is therapeutic for hiccups. A definitive answer continues to be elusive.
Subject(s)
Aripiprazole/pharmacology , Hiccup/chemically induced , Neurotransmitter Agents/pharmacology , Quinolones/pharmacology , Thiophenes/pharmacology , Aripiprazole/adverse effects , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Neurotransmitter Agents/adverse effects , Neurotransmitter Agents/pharmacokinetics , Quinolones/adverse effects , Quinolones/pharmacokinetics , Thiophenes/adverse effects , Thiophenes/pharmacokineticsABSTRACT
Background: Pharmacogenetics study was added into 2 bioequivalence trials of aripiprazole. The correlation between CYP2D6 polymorphisms and aripiprazole pharmacokinetics (PK) was analyzed. Materials & methods: A total of 140 subjects were included. A total of 26 CYP2D6 gene alleles were detected. The plasma concentration of aripiprazole was measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. SPSS Statistics 21 was used to analyze the correlation between CYP2D6 polymorphisms and aripiprazole PK parameters. Results: All of the four PK parameters were significantly influenced by CYP2D6rs1058164 and rs28371699. t1/2 and area under the concentration-time curve exhibited significant difference between CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers and intermediate metabolizers. Conclusion: Aripiprazole PK was greatly influenced by CYP2D6. Attention should be paid to the possible dose adjustment for CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer population when the drug is used in Chinese patients.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Alleles , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Area Under Curve , Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Asian People , Female , Genotype , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Therapeutic EquivalencyABSTRACT
The present study pursued the systematic development of a stable solid self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) of an atypical antipsychotic drug, aripiprazole (APZ), which exhibits poor aqueous solubility and undergoes extensive p-glycoprotein efflux and hepatic metabolism. Liquid SMEDDS excipients were selected on the basis of solubility studies, and the optimum ratio of surfactant/co-surfactant was determined using pseudo-ternary phase diagrams. The prepared formulations were subjected to in vitro characterization studies to facilitate the selection of optimum liquid SMEDD formulation containing 30% Labrafil® M 1944 CS, 46.7% Cremophor® EL and 23.3% PEG 400 which were further subjected to solidification using maltodextrin as a hydrophilic carrier. The optimized solid SMEDDS was extensively evaluated for stability under accelerated conditions, dissolution at various pH and pharmacokinetic profile. Solid-state attributes of the optimized solid SMEDDS indicated a marked reduction in crystallinity of APZ and uniform adsorption of liquid SMEDDS. Stability study of the solid SMEDDS demonstrated that the developed formulation retained its stability during the accelerated storage conditions. Both the optimized liquid and solid SMEDDS exhibited enhanced dissolution rate which was furthermore independent of the pH of the dissolution medium. Oral bioavailability studies in Sprague-Dawley rats confirmed quicker and greater extent of absorption with solid SMEDDS as evident from the significant reduction in Tmax in case of solid SMEDDS (0.83 ± 0.12 h) as compared with commercial tablet (3.33 ± 0.94 h). The results of the present investigation indicated the development of a stable solid SMEDDS formulation of APZ with enhanced dissolution and absorption attributes.
Subject(s)
Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Drug Delivery Systems , Administration, Oral , Animals , Aripiprazole/chemistry , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Biological Availability , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Drug Liberation , Emulsions/chemistry , Female , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Rats , Rats, Sprague-DawleyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole is regarded as the first-line antipsychotic medication. Long-term aripiprazole therapy can cause hypoprolactinemia, which may result from its activity as a dopamine agonist. However, there is little information on hypoprolactinemia and steady-state aripiprazole concentrations. METHODS: The subjects included 66 male and 177 female patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who were treated with aripiprazole. The plasma concentrations of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole and the plasma concentration of prolactin were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography and enzyme immunoassay, respectively. A prolactin concentration of <5 ng/mL was defined as hypoprolactinemia. RESULTS: Fifty-two of the 66 male patients (79%) and 58 of the 177 female patients (33%) had hypoprolactinemia. There were significant inverse correlations between plasma prolactin levels and plasma concentrations of aripiprazole (rs = -0.447, P < 0.001) and the active moiety (aripiprazole plus dehydroaripiprazole) (rs = -0.429, P < 0.001) in men. In women, significant inverse correlations were also found between plasma prolactin levels and plasma concentrations of aripiprazole (rs = -0.273, P < 0.01) and the active moiety (rs = -0.275, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that lower prolactin levels are, to some extent, associated with higher plasma drug concentrations in male and female patients with schizophrenia treated with aripiprazole.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Prolactin/blood , Schizophrenia , Antipsychotic Agents/blood , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aripiprazole/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Schizophrenia/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic approved for treatment of schizophrenia in adults. Approved AL doses and dosing regimens include 441 mg monthly, 662 mg monthly, and 882 mg monthly or every 6 weeks (q6wk), as well as the most recently approved dose, 1064 mg, administered every 2 months. OBJECTIVE: Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of an AL regimen with a dose interval of every 2 months (1064 mg) were compared with two other regimens available as monthly and q6wk options. METHODS: This study evaluated pharmacokinetics of AL given at a higher dosage strength (1064 mg) and at a longer dose interval (every 8 weeks [q8wk]) than previously studied. Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder entering this 44-week, phase I, open-label, multicenter study had no recent exposure to aripiprazole and were maintained on other oral antipsychotics throughout the study. Patients were randomized to one of three AL dose regimens for 24 weeks (four 1064-mg injections [q8wk], five 882-mg injections [q6wk], or seven 441-mg injections [q4wk], with the last AL exposure at week 24). Oral aripiprazole was prohibited. Patients were followed for an additional 20 weeks to assess terminal aripiprazole plasma concentrations and ongoing safety. Plasma concentration samples were obtained at regular intervals to provide pharmacokinetic data for the duration of AL exposure and to measure persistence of plasma aripiprazole concentrations after AL discontinuation. RESULTS: Eligible patients received AL 1064 mg q8wk (n = 35), 882 mg q6wk (n = 34), or 441 mg q4wk (n = 35). Overall, 103/104 (99.0%) patients were taking concomitant non-aripiprazole oral antipsychotic medications during the study. All three AL dose regimens provided continuous exposure to aripiprazole. Mean aripiprazole concentrations from the 1064-mg q8wk regimen were comparable to the 882-mg q6wk regimen and higher than the 441-mg q4wk regimen. Overall incidence by group of any adverse events (AEs) throughout the study was 68.6% (1064 mg q8wk), 50.0% (882 mg q6wk), and 65.7% (441 mg q4wk). The most common AE across regimens was injection-site pain (range 8.6%-11.4%). Serious AEs were reported by eight patients (all but one [increased psychosis in one patient, 441-mg q4wk group] considered unrelated to study drug). Discontinuations due to AEs were reported for 2.9%, 11.8%, and 5.7% of patients receiving the 8-, 6-, and 4-week regimens, respectively. AEs of akathisia, dyskinesia, and dystonia occurred in 2.9%, 8.6%, and 5.7% of patients in the 1064-mg q8wk group, 8.8%, 0%, and 2.9% in the 882-mg q6wk group, and 8.6%, 0%, and 0% in the 441-mg q4wk group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AL 1064 mg q8wk provided continuous exposure to aripiprazole throughout the 8-week dosing interval and had a safety profile consistent with the 4- and 6-week regimens. These findings were used to support FDA approval of the 1064-mg dose administered every 2 months. REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02320032.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aripiprazole/adverse effects , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Aripiprazole (ARP) is an antipsychotic drug approved for the treatment of schizophrenia. It is poorly water-soluble and undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism and P-gp efflux, which lead to poor bioavailability and increased dose-related side effects. This study focuses on the preparation of mixed micelles (MM) to enhance the aqueous solubility, oral bioavailability, and blood-brain barrier permeation of ARP. For this purpose, Soluplus and D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) were selected for micelle preparation (ARP-MM). Micelles with borneol as penetration enhancer were also considered (ARP-B-MM). The optimized formulations have sizes of ca 50 nm, defined in distilled water, narrow size distribution (polydispersity index ≤0.1), and high encapsulation efficiency (greater than98%). Both formulations can be freeze-dried without losing their chemical-physical characteristics and are stable during storage for three months. The mixed micelles resulted stable in enzyme free-simulated gastric fluid (SGF, pH 1.2), simulated intestinal fluid (SIF, pH 6.8), and in serum. The in vitro ARP release was evaluated in the same biorelevant media, (SGF and SIF), and it disclosed that both micelles can give prolonged drug release. Furthermore, ARP solubility is greatly increased when loaded into mixed micelles. The absorption and efflux of ARP-loaded micelles were studied in vitro, employing two artificial membranes (Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay for the intestinal, PAMPA-GI, and the blood-brain barrier, PAMPA-BBB), to simulate the intestinal and brain epithelium, and the brain microvascular endothelial cell line hCMEC/D3. ARP-MM and ARP-B-MM increase the effective permeability of ARP by a factor of about three in the case of PAMPA-GI and about two for PAMPA-BBB. Furthermore, the P-gp mediated efflux was decreased by about six times in the case of ARP-MM and by about four times in the case of ARP-B-MM, compared to unformulated ARP. Finally, both ARP-loaded mixed micelles ameliorate the bioavailability of ARP, as demonstrated by the increase of the pharmacokinetic parameters, such as Cmax, AUC0-24h, and t1/2.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Aripiprazole , Micelles , Administration, Oral , Animals , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/chemistry , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Aripiprazole/chemistry , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Biological Availability , Cell Line , Drug Liberation , Hemolysis/drug effects , Humans , Male , Mice , Permeability , Rats, Wistar , SolubilityABSTRACT
The matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI MSI) technique has attracted intense interest in the visualization of drug distribution in tissues. Its capability to spatially resolve individual molecules makes it a unique tool in drug development and research. However, low drug content and severe ion suppression in tissues hinder its broader application to resolve drug tissue distribution, especially small molecule drugs with a molecular weight below 500 Da. In this work, an integrated tissue pretreatment protocol was developed to enhance the detection of central nervous system drugs in the mouse brain using MALDI MSI. To evaluate the protocol, brain sections from mice dosed intraperitoneally with donepezil, tacrine, clozapine, haloperidol, and aripiprazole were used. The tissue sections were pretreated serially by washing with ammonium acetate solution, incubation with trifluoroacetic acid vapor, and n-hexane washing before MALDI MSI. Compared with the untreated sample, the signal intensities for the test drugs increased by 4.7- to 31.5-fold after pretreatment. Besides the enhancement of signal intensity, fine optimization of pretreatment time and washing solvents preserved the spatial distribution of target drug molecules. The utility of the developed protocol also provided tissue-specific distribution for five drugs which were well resolved when imaged by MALDI MS.
Subject(s)
Brain/metabolism , Central Nervous System Agents/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Brain Chemistry , Central Nervous System Agents/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Agents/analysis , Clozapine/pharmacokinetics , Donepezil/pharmacokinetics , Haloperidol/pharmacokinetics , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Peritoneum/drug effects , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/methods , Tacrine/pharmacokinetics , Tissue DistributionABSTRACT
El Trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo constituye una patología grave e incapacitante. El tratamiento de primera línea no consigue una remisión completa en casi la mitad de los pacientes. En adultos se ha demostrado la utilidad del tratamiento coadyuvante con aripiprazol en estos casos. En adolescentes la evidencia al respecto es escasa, aunque se han publicado algunos resultados prometedores. Tampoco se dispone de evidencia suficiente sobre la eficacia y seguridad de los antipsicóticos inyectables de liberación prolongada en población adolescente, por lo que sólo se recomiendan en trastornos psicóticos con respuesta insuficiente por falta de adherencia. Sin embargo, algunos autores proponen extender su utilización a otras patologías. Se presenta el caso de una paciente adolescente con trastorno obsesivocompulsivo resistente al tratamiento de primera línea, en la que la utilización coadyuvante de aripiprazol inyectable de liberación prolongada permite un buen control de la clínica obsesiva y contribuye a evitar nuevas descompensaciones
Obsessive-compulsive disorder is a severe and disabling pathology. First-line treatment does not achieve full remission in almost half of patients. In adults, the efficacy of the adjuvant treatment with aripiprazole has been demonstrated in these cases. There is not enough evidence in the adolescent population, although some promising results have been published. Scant evidence is available on the efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in adolescents. Their use is recommended only in psychotic disorders with insufficient response due to lack of adherence. However, some authors suggest their use in other pathologies. The case of an adolescent patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder resistant to first-line treatment is presented. The adjuvant use of long-acting injectable aripiprazole allows for good control of the obsessive symptoms and helps prevent future episodes
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/drug therapy , Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Sertraline/administration & dosage , Delayed-Action Preparations/pharmacokinetics , Injections, Intramuscular/methods , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Sertraline/pharmacokinetics , Symptom Flare UpABSTRACT
Antipsychotic medicines are widely used for the management of psychotic symptoms regardless of the underlying diagnosis. Most atypical antipsychotics undergo extensive metabolism prior to excretion. Various factors may influence their pharmacokinetics, particularly elimination, leading to highly variable drug concentrations between individual patients following the same dosing regimen. Population pharmacokinetic approach, based on nonlinear mixed effects modeling, is a useful tool to identify covariates explaining pharmacokinetic variability, as well as to characterize and distinguish unexplained residual and between-subject (interindividual) variability. In addition, this approach allows the use of both sparsely and intensively sampled data. In this paper, we reviewed the pharmacokinetic characteristics of clozapine, olanzapine and aripiprazole, focusing on a population modeling approach. In particular, models based on a nonlinear mixed effects approach performed by NONMEM® software in order to identify and quantify sources of pharmacokinetic variability are presented. Population models were identified through systematic searches of PubMed and sixteen studies were selected. Some of the factors identified that significantly contribute to variability in elimination among clozapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole are demographic characteristics, body weight, genetic polymorphism, smoking and in some cases drug interactions. Scientific research based on pharmacometric modeling is useful to further characterize sources of variability and their combined effect.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Models, Biological , Animals , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Clozapine/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Nonlinear Dynamics , Olanzapine/pharmacokineticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Infections can alter drug clearance, but the impact of inflammation-induced changes is still not well known. The aim of the investigation was to examine the effect of pathological C-reactive protein (CRP) values (≥0.5 mg/dL) and leukocyte count on the metabolism of 4 different atypical antipsychotics. METHODS: Steady-state serum concentrations of individual patients under therapy with risperidone (n=45), aripiprazole (n=30), olanzapine (n=24), and quetiapine (n=166) were retrospectively analyzed during a period of inflammation by Spearman's Rho correlation analysis. Mann-Whitney U test was applied for comparison of patients with serum concentrations above and below the upper limit of the therapeutic reference range of each target drug with regard to CRP concentration and leukocyte count. Linear regression analysis was applied to correct for confounding parameters age and sex. RESULTS: Pathological concentrations of CRP were significantly associated with elevated values of C/D of quetiapine (n=166, Spearman's Rho: r=0.269, p<0.001; linear regression: p<0.001). Among patients with quetiapine serum concentrations below 500 ng/mL, CRP concentrations were significantly (p=0.006) lower compared to patients with quetiapine concentrations above 500 ng/mL. A trend for a positive correlation between CRP and serum concentration was found for olanzapine (n=24, Spearman's Rho: r=0.385, p=0.063; linear regression: p=0.086). CONCLUSION: During a period of inflammation in patients taking quetiapine, according to our results, attention in dosing strategies is required to prevent toxic plasma concentrations.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Inflammation/immunology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antipsychotic Agents/blood , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Female , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Olanzapine/pharmacokinetics , Quetiapine Fumarate/pharmacokinetics , Retrospective Studies , Risperidone/pharmacokinetics , Sex Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Aripiprazole treatment in schizophrenic patients was previously associated with lower or normalized prolactin levels. Genetic variants in cytochrome P450 (CYP) (CYP2D6), dopamine receptor (DRD2, DRD3) and serotonin receptor (HTR2A, HTR2C) genes were previously associated with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia. Our aim was to evaluate whether aripiprazole affects prolactin secretion and its relationship with pharmacogenetics. Thirty-one healthy volunteers receiving a 10-mg single oral dose of aripiprazole were genotyped for 12 polymorphisms in CYP2D6, DRD2, DRD3, HTR2A and HTR2C genes by qPCR. Aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC-MS/MS. Prolactin concentrations of the 31 volunteers taking aripiprazole and 12 volunteers receiving ibuprofen were determined by ELISA. Prolactin concentrations after ibuprofen intake were considered as control, since it is known to cause no effect. Prolactin concentrations were slightly higher in the aripiprazole group compared to the ibuprofen group. All prolactin pharmacokinetic parameters were higher in females than in males. CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers had notably higher prolactin Cmax and AUC0-12 than normal and ultrarapid metabolizers. The DRD3 rs6280 polymorphism affected prolactin levels: volunteers carrying Ser/Ser genotype had significantly lower prolactin levels than volunteers carrying the Gly allele. Furthermore, HTR2C rs3813929 C/C homozygotes had significantly lower prolactin levels than T allele carriers. Nevertheless, aripiprazole did increase prolactin levels compared to ibuprofen.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Aripiprazole/pharmacology , Pharmacogenetics , Prolactin/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Circadian Rhythm , Cross-Over Studies , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Female , Humans , Ibuprofen/pharmacology , Male , Piperazines/pharmacokinetics , Quinolones/pharmacokinetics , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2C/genetics , Receptors, Dopamine D3/genetics , Sex Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The polymorphic CYP2D6 enzyme metabolises the antipsychotic drugs risperidone and aripiprazole to their active metabolites, 9OH-risperidone and dehydroaripiprazole. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of CYP2D6 genetic variability on risperidone and aripiprazole exposure and treatment in a large patient population. METHODS: We retrospectively obtained patient data from a routine therapeutic drug monitoring database at the Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, between Jan 1, 2005, and Oct 15, 2018. Individuals included in our analyses were CYP2D6-genotyped patients treated with risperidone or aripiprazole. Inclusion criteria for measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters (drug and metabolite serum concentrations) were oral administration of risperidone or aripiprazole, information known about prescribed daily dose and comedications, and aged older than 18 years. Exclusion criteria included polypharmacy with drugs known to be CYP2D6 inhibitors or CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors. Treatment failure was analysed in all patients treated with risperidone or aripiprazole without these criteria. The first endpoint in our analysis was the metabolism of risperidone to 9OH-risperidone and aripiprazole to dehydroaripiprazole, estimated by the log-transformed ratio between the concentrations of metabolite and parent drug (ie, the metabolic ratio for risperidone [9OH-risperidone]/[risperidone] and the metabolic ratio for aripiprazole [dehydroaripiprazole]/[aripiprazole]). Endpoint two was measurement of drug exposure, quantified by the dose-normalised sum of parent drug and active metabolite serum concentrations (ie, active moiety). The third endpoint of treatment failure was measured as the number of patients switched from risperidone or aripiprazole to another antipsychotic drug within 1 year after the last therapeutic drug monitoring analysis of risperidone or aripiprazole. Patient subgroups were defined by CYP2D6 genotype-determined metaboliser status: poor metabolisers, intermediate metabolisers, normal metabolisers, and ultrarapid metabolisers. ANOVA was used to assess the differences in metabolic ratios, active moieties, and daily doses between individual metaboliser categories, and risperidone and aripiprazole therapeutic failures were compared by logistic regression using the normal metaboliser subgroup as a reference. FINDINGS: 1288 risperidone-treated patients and 1334 aripiprazole-treated patients were included in the study, of whom 725 (56%) risperidone-treated and 890 (67%) aripiprazole-treated patients were eligible for the pharmacokinetic analyses. CYP2D6 genotype significantly changed risperidone and aripiprazole metabolism resulting in an approximately 1·6-times and 1·4-times increase in risperidone and aripiprazole active moiety exposure in poor and intermediate metabolisers compared with normal metabolisers, respectively (odds ratios [OR] for the risperidone dose-normalised active moiety concentration 1·568, 95% CI 1·401-1·736, and 1·373, 1·213-1·532; and for the aripiprazole dose-normalised active moiety concentration 1·585, 1·447-1·724, and 1·476, 1·263-1·688, respectively; p<0·0001 for all). Compared with doses for normal metabolisers, clinicians reduced daily doses of risperidone and aripiprazole administered to poor metabolisers by 19% (95% CI 5-35, p=0·010) and 15% (95% CI 1-28, p=0·033) respectively. The incidence of switching from risperidone to another antipsychotic was increased in ultrarapid metabolisers (OR 2·934, 95% CI 1·437-5·989, p=0·003) and poor metabolisers (1·874, 1·128-3·112, p=0·015); by contrast, the incidence of switching from aripiprazole to another antipsychotic was not significantly related to CYP2D6 metaboliser status. INTERPRETATION: CYP2D6 genotype had a substantial clinical effect on risperidone and aripiprazole exposure and on the therapeutic failure of risperidone. Pre-emptive CYP2D6 genotyping would be valuable for individualising risperidone and aripiprazole dosing and treatment optimisation. FUNDING: H2020 program U-PGx, The Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Brain foundation, and the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Pharmacogenomic Variants , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Risperidone/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway , Psychotic Disorders/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Risperidone/pharmacokinetics , Treatment Failure , Young AdultSubject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Biosensing Techniques/methods , Gastrointestinal Absorption/drug effects , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Biosensing Techniques/instrumentation , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/metabolism , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/metabolism , Gastrointestinal Absorption/physiology , Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/metabolism , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentationABSTRACT
When dopamine was identified as a primary target for schizophrenia, the dopamine antagonists, now referred to as first-generation antipsychotics, were added to our pharmacopeia. In the 1990s, with the discovery of risperidone and clozapine, the mechanism of dopamine receptor antagonism was paired with serotonin receptor antagonism to give rise to second-generation antipsychotics. A decade later these mechanisms were further refined to selective dopamine receptors antagonism and serotonin receptors antagonism and agonism to create a modulation or stabilization of dopamine nerve firing in differential ways. This new wave may be referred to as the third generation. The current article reviews the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of these dopamine modulators. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 57(2), 7-11.].
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists , Serotonin Antagonists , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Aripiprazole/pharmacology , Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Humans , Quinolones/pharmacokinetics , Quinolones/pharmacology , Receptors, Dopamine D2/agonists , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Serotonin Antagonists/pharmacology , Thiophenes/pharmacokinetics , Thiophenes/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Dietary supplements and foods can interact with various drugs, leading to possible clinical concerns. This study aimed to investigate the effect of orally administered sinapic acid (SA) on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole (APZ) in rats and its possible modulatory effects on hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP3A2 and CYP2D6) expression in the liver tissues. Single dose and multiple dose parallel groups of wistar rats were categorized into six groups (n = 6 each) which abstained from food for 12 h prior to the experiment, while water was allowed ad libitum. The investigation was carried out for single dose: Group I was treated with normal saline orally for 15 days (normal control). Group II was administered normal saline orally for 15 days and received APZ (3 mg/kg p.o.) on day 15. Group III received SA (20 mg/kg p.o.) for 15 days and received APZ (3 mg/kg p.o.) on day 15. Group IV was treated with SA (20 mg/kg p.o.) for 15 days. For the multiple dose study, Group I was treated with normal saline orally for 15 days (normal control); Group II received APZ (3 mg/kg p.o.) daily for 15 days; Group III was administered with SA (20 mg/kg p.o.) and APZ (3 mg/kg p.o.) for 15 days and Group IV received SA (20 mg/kg p.o.) for 15 days. The group I and IV were kept common in single and multiple dose groups. After last APZ dose, plasma samples were collected and APZ concentrations were determined using an UPLC-MS/MS technique. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental analysis. The concomitant administration of APZ with SA (as single or multiple dose) resulted in an increase in APZ absorption and a decrease on its systemic clearance. This was associated with a reduction in CYP3A2 and CYP2D6 protein expressions by 33-43% and -71-68% after the single and multiple co-administration, which are two enzymes responsible of the metabolism of APZ. Therefore, a reduction in the metabolic clearance appears to be the mechanism underlying the drug interaction of dietary supplement containing SA with APZ. Therefore, the concomitant administration of SA and APZ should be carefully viewed. Further investigations are required to assess the clinical significance of such observations in humans.