Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 369
Filter
1.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934953

ABSTRACT

The rehabilitation of patients after upper limb injuries is becoming increasingly relevant in current medical practice considering that this pathology is often occurred in professional athletes, elderly people, people with active lifestyle. OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of isolated therapeutic exercises (TE) with eccentric muscle loads when using rubber cable compared to traditional TE to restore functional capabilities of patients after upper limb injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 38 patients with upper limb injuries diagnosed by orthopedic surgeon. Patients were randomly enrolled into group of isolated TE with eccentric muscle loads (group A, 20 patients, mean age 40.2±10.8 years) and group of traditional exercises (group B, 18 patients, mean age 38.6±12.3 years). The study consisted of anamnesis taking, clinical examination, functional tests applying (isometric dynamometry, joint mobility tests, functional scales and questionnaires). The rehabilitation effectiveness was assessed by comparing the indicators before and after treatment course. RESULTS: There has been a significant improvement in muscle strength, movement amplitude and decrease of pain syndrome in patients rehabilitated by eccentric muscle loads. A comparison with a control group using traditional TE methods confirmed the superiority of eccentric exercises in reducing recovery time and improving functional performance. CONCLUSION: The study confirmed the high effectiveness of eccentric muscular loads in the rehabilitation of patients after upper limb injuries. The method has shown significant improvement in clinical and functional indices, which allows to recommend it for inclusion in standard rehabilitation protocols. Further researches may extend application of this approach and reveal the TE effectiveness in other types of traumas and orthopedic injuries.


Subject(s)
Upper Extremity , Humans , Adult , Male , Female , Upper Extremity/physiopathology , Upper Extremity/injuries , Middle Aged , Exercise Therapy/methods , Muscle Strength/physiology , Arm Injuries/rehabilitation , Arm Injuries/physiopathology
2.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 479(4): 826-834, 2021 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33196588

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We previously found that social deprivation was associated with worse perceived function and pain among children presenting with upper extremity fractures. We performed the current study to determine whether this differential in outcome scores would resolve after children received orthopaedic treatment for their fractures. This was needed to understand whether acute pain and impaired function were magnified by worse social deprivation or whether social deprivation was associated with differences in health perception even after injury resolution. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Comparing patients from the least socially deprived national quartile and those from the most deprived quartile, we asked: (1) Are there differences in age, gender, race, or fracture location among children with upper extremity fractures? (2) After controlling for relevant confounding variables, is worse social deprivation associated with worse self-reported Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores before and after the treatment of pediatric upper extremity fractures? (3) Is social deprivation associated with PROMIS score improvements as a result of fracture treatment? METHODS: In this this retrospective, comparative study, we considered data from 1131 pediatric patients (aged 8 to 17 years) treated nonoperatively at a single tertiary academic medical center for isolated upper extremity fractures between June 2016 and June 2017. We used the Area Deprivation Index to define the patient's social deprivation by national quartiles to analyze those in the most- and least-deprived quartiles. After excluding patients with missing zip codes (n = 181), 18% (172 of 950) lived in the most socially deprived national quartile, while 31% (295 of 950) lived in the least socially deprived quartile. Among these 467 patients in the most- and least-deprived quartiles, 28% (129 of 467) were excluded for lack of follow-up and 9% (41 of 467) were excluded for incomplete PROMIS scores. The remaining 297 patients were analyzed (107 most-deprived quartile, 190 least-deprived quartile) longitudinally in the current study; they included 237 from our initial cross-sectional investigation that only considered reported health at presentation (60 patients added and 292 removed from the 529 patients in the original study, based on updated Area Deprivation Index quartiles). The primary outcomes were the self-completed pediatric PROMIS Upper Extremity Function, Pain Interference, and secondarily PROMIS Peer Relationships computer-adaptive tests. In each PROMIS assessment, higher scores indicated more of that domain (such as, higher function scores indicate better function but a higher pain score indicates more pain), and clinically relevant differences were approximately 3 points. Bivariate analysis compared patient age, gender, race, fracture type, and PROMIS scores between the most- and least-deprived groups. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with the final PROMIS scores. RESULTS: Between the two quartiles, the only demographic and injury characteristic difference was race, with Black children being overrepresented in the most-deprived group (most deprived: white 53% [57 of 107], Black 45% [48 of 107], other 2% [2 of 107]; least deprived: white 92% [174 of 190], Black 4% [7 of 190), other 5% [9 of 190]; p < 0.001). At presentation, accounting for patient gender, race, and fracture location, the most socially deprived quartile remained independently associated with the initial PROMIS Upper Extremity (ß 5.8 [95% CI 3.2 to 8.4]; p < 0.001) scores. After accounting for patient gender, race, and number of days in care, we found that the social deprivation quartile remained independently associated with the final PROMIS Upper Extremity (ß 4.9 [95% CI 2.3 to 7.6]; p < 0.001) and Pain Interference scores (ß -4.4 [95% CI -2.3 to -6.6]; p < 0.001). Social deprivation quartile was not associated with any differential in treatment impact on change in PROMIS Upper Extremity function (8 ± 13 versus 8 ± 12; mean difference 0.4 [95% CI -3.4 to 2.6]; p = 0.79) or Pain Interference scores (8 ± 9 versus 6 ± 12; mean difference 1.1 [95% CI -1.4 to 3.5]; p = 0.39) from presentation to the conclusion of treatment. CONCLUSION: Delivering upper extremity fracture care produces substantial improvement in pain and function that is consistent regardless of a child's degree of social deprivation. However, as social deprivation is associated with worse perceived health at treatment initiation and conclusion, prospective interventional trials are needed to determine how orthopaedic surgeons can act to reduce the health disparities in children associated with social deprivation. As fractures prompt interaction with our health care system, the orthopaedic community may be well placed to identify children who could benefit from enrollment in proven community health initiatives or to advocate for multidisciplinary care coordinators such as social workers in fracture clinics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/therapy , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Healthcare Disparities , Orthopedic Procedures , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Social Determinants of Health , Socioeconomic Factors , Adolescent , Age Factors , Arm Injuries/diagnosis , Arm Injuries/ethnology , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Child , Female , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Fractures, Bone/ethnology , Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Poverty , Race Factors , Residence Characteristics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Treatment Outcome
3.
Air Med J ; 39(5): 414-416, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33012482

ABSTRACT

This case describes the use of tranexamic acid as an adjunctive treatment in the management of a pediatric patient in hemorrhagic shock. The case also highlights other components of current best practices for hemorrhagic shock in children, including bleeding source control and prompt resuscitation with blood products. A 20-month old male suffered an agricultural accident with significant injury to the right upper extremity. This led to subsequent extremity hemorrhage and clinical evidence of hemorrhagic shock. As a result of interventions performed by emergency medical services as well as the helicopter emergency medical services team, including the application of a tourniquet, prehospital blood product administration, and tranexamic acid administration, the patient had hemodynamically stabilized by arrival at the level 1 pediatric trauma center and was neurologically intact when discharged from the hospital.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Emergency Medical Services , Farms , Shock, Hemorrhagic/drug therapy , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Accidental Injuries , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Critical Care/methods , Humans , Infant , Male
4.
R I Med J (2013) ; 103(7): 49-53, 2020 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32872690

ABSTRACT

Weekend warriors are individuals who condense their weekly physical activity into extended intervals over one or two days.1 Excessive physical activity can result in a multitude of overuse and traumatic upper extremity injuries. The purpose of this review is to highlight the etiology and management of the more common hand and wrist injuries in athletes.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Athletic Injuries/physiopathology , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/physiopathology , Hand Injuries/physiopathology , Wrist Injuries/physiopathology , Arm Injuries/etiology , Athletic Injuries/etiology , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/etiology , Hand Injuries/etiology , Humans , Time Factors , Wrist Injuries/etiology
5.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 29(8): 1548-1553, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32381475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps tendon avulsions account for 3%-10% of all biceps ruptures. Treated nonoperatively, these injuries lead to a loss of endurance, supination strength, and flexion strength compared with operative repair or reconstruction. Operative management of chronic injury has classically been with graft tissue to augment the contracted muscle. We present our results for chronic distal biceps avulsions secured with suture button through a single transverse incision in high flexion without the need for allograft augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 20 patients with 21 injuries who underwent primary surgical repair of chronic distal biceps tendon avulsions at an average of 10 weeks (range 4-42 weeks). All patients were treated with a single transverse incision with a suture button armed with nonabsorbable no. 2 core sutures. Postoperatively patients were found to have 50°-90° flexion contracture. All patients were placed in a simple sling postoperatively with gentle extension to gravity as tolerated immediately and no formal physical therapy. Patients were surveyed regarding pre- and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and overall satisfaction. Range of motion (ROM), flexion, and supination strength compared to the contralateral uninjured extremity were evaluated at final follow-up. RESULTS: Mean clinical follow-up was 26 months. All patients regained full ROM and 5/5 flexion and supination strength at final follow-up. MEPSs were 100 for all responding patients compared with an average 47.5 preoperatively (P < .0001). The mean postoperative ASES score was 97.2 compared with 41.9 preoperatively (P < .0001). Mean OESs pre- and postoperatively were 24.2 and 48, respectively (P < .0001). The mean VAS score was 4.4 preoperatively and was reported as 0 by all patients at final follow-up (P < .0001). Two patients had transient sensory radial nerve neuropathy, and 1 patient has persistent palsy. No synostoses occurred. Four patients reported supination fatigue postoperatively compared with the uninjured extremity. CONCLUSION: Given these results, we feel that chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures can be repaired successfully with a single incision using suture button technique without the use of a graft. Though the flexion contracture is significant postoperatively, all patients regained full ROM and had excellent postoperative functional outcome scores.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/surgery , Suture Techniques/instrumentation , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Adult , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Contracture/etiology , Contracture/physiopathology , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Musculoskeletal Pain/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Range of Motion, Articular , Retrospective Studies , Rupture/complications , Rupture/physiopathology , Rupture/surgery , Supination , Sutures , Tendon Injuries/complications , Tendon Injuries/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
6.
OTJR (Thorofare N J) ; 40(4): 223-234, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32200698

ABSTRACT

Following upper extremity injury, exercise-approaches are commonly used to address motor impairments. Occupation-based approaches are also used but less widely promoted and their mechanisms of action not well-understood. Movement performed during purposeful activities and occupations may yield better motor performance than during nonpurposeful tasks. This review investigated the influence of engagement in purposeful activities and occupations on upper extremity motor performance in healthy and musculoskeletal populations. Databases were searched for studies in healthy or upper extremity musculoskeletal-injured adults that compared motor performance during purposeful activities against nonpurposeful movements. Twenty-one studies of moderate quality, conducted predominantly in healthy populations, were included. Upper extremity movement quantity and quality were enhanced when performed during purposeful conditions. Purposeful activities have potential to be used following injury to enhance movement and address motor impairments to a greater extent than is currently promoted. Research in musculoskeletal populations is required.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Arm Injuries/rehabilitation , Occupational Therapy/methods , Upper Extremity/injuries , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Humans , Motor Skills , Movement , Recovery of Function , Upper Extremity/physiopathology
7.
Sports Health ; 12(2): 132-138, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32027223

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Humeral torsion (HT) has been linked to various injuries and benefits. However, the exact interplay between HT, shoulder range of motion (ROM), competition level differences, and injury risk is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between HT, ROM, and injury risk in baseball players. Secondarily, to determine HT based on competition level. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until November 4, 2018. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria consisted of (1) HT measurements and (2) arm injury or shoulder ROM. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers recorded patient demographics, competition level, HT, shoulder ROM, and injury data. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies were included. There was no difference between baseball players with shoulder and elbow injuries and noninjured players (side-to-side HT difference: mean difference [MD], 1.75 [95% CI, -1.83 to 2.18]; dominant arm: MD, 0.17 [95% CI, -1.83 to 2.18]). Meta-regression determined that for every 1° increase in shoulder internal rotation (IR), there was a subsequent increase of 0.65° in HT (95% CI, 0.28 to 1.02). HT did not explain external rotation (ER ROM: 0.19 [95% CI, -0.24 to 0.61]) or horizontal adduction (HA ROM: 0.18 [95% CI, -0.46 to 0.82]). There were no differences between HT at the high school, college, or professional levels. CONCLUSION: No relationship was found between HT and injury risk. However, HT explained 65% of IR ROM but did not explain ER ROM or HA ROM. There were no differences in HT pertaining to competition level. The majority of IR may be nonmodifiable. Treatment to restore and maintain clinical IR may be important, especially in players with naturally greater torsion. HT adaptation may occur prior to high school, which can assist in decisions regarding adolescent baseball participation.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Baseball/injuries , Humerus/physiology , Adaptation, Physiological , Competitive Behavior/physiology , Humans , Humerus/physiopathology , Range of Motion, Articular , Risk Factors , Rotation
8.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 26(1): 95-102, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31942737

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Mangled Extremity Severity Score is a decision-making tool for limb amputation after trauma. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire was developed to quantify posttraumatic functional deficits of the upper extremity. This study aims to determine the correlation between these two assessments. METHODS: In this study, a retrospective review of all patients with upper extremity injuries who had been treated with vascular reconstruction at two centres between 2005 and 2014 was performed. The respective Mangled Extremity Severity Score was calculated for each participant. Patients were recalled for follow-up examination and assessment of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score. RESULTS: In this study, 14 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean total Mangled Extremity Severity Score was 5.9 and the mean total Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score was 30 points. There was no statistically significant correlation between these assessments (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient: 0.49, p=0.075). CONCLUSION: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score did not correlate significantly with the Mangled Extremity Severity Score.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries , Upper Extremity , Amputation, Surgical , Arm Injuries/epidemiology , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Arm Injuries/surgery , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Severity Indices , Treatment Outcome , Upper Extremity/injuries , Upper Extremity/physiopathology , Upper Extremity/surgery
9.
Phys Ther ; 100(2): 332-345, 2020 02 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31588514

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is increasingly recognized as an important marker of functional recovery following fracture. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to measure sedentary behavior and physical activity 2 weeks and 6 months following fracture and to determine associated demographic and injury factors. DESIGN: This was an observational study. METHODS: Two weeks and 6 months following fracture, 83 adults who were 18 to 69 years old and had upper limb (UL) or lower limb (LL) fractures wore an accelerometer and an inclinometer for 10 days. We calculated sitting time, steps, moderate-intensity physical activity (MPA), and vigorous-intensity physical activity and conducted linear mixed-effects multivariable regression analyses to determine factors associated with temporal changes in activity. RESULTS: At 6 months versus 2 weeks after fracture, participants sat less, took more steps, and engaged in more MPA. Participants with LL fractures sat 2 hours more, took 66% fewer steps, and engaged in 77% less MPA than participants with UL fractures. Greater reductions in sitting time were observed for participants in the youngest age group and with LL fractures, participants with high preinjury activity, and participants who were overweight or obese. For steps, greater improvement was observed for participants in the youngest and middle-aged groups and those with LL fractures. For MPA, greater improvement was observed for middle-aged participants and those with LL fractures. LIMITATIONS: Although this study was sufficiently powered for the analysis of major categories, a convenience sample that may not be representative of all people with musculoskeletal trauma was used. CONCLUSIONS: Working-age adults with LL fractures had lower levels of physical activity 6 months after fracture than those with UL fractures. Older adults showed less improvement over time, suggesting that they are an important target group for interventions aimed at regaining preinjury activity levels.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Exercise , Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Leg Injuries/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Sedentary Behavior , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/physiopathology , Overweight/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Sitting Position , Time Factors , Young Adult
10.
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) ; 77(4): 238-243, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31785136

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis (OSBT) with cortical button fixation can deliver acceptable results for long head of the biceps (LHB) pathology with the benefit of smaller bone tunnel diameter and a potential reduced risk of postoperative humeral shaft fracture. However, functional outcomes and complications of a button-only technique with a small diameter tunnel in the subpectoral region have not been studied sufficiently. PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether OSBT with cortical button fixation results in significant functional improvements from preoperative to final follow-up. The secondary purpose was to determine whether there is a lower risk of major postoperative complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent OSBT with cortical button fixation at one institution was conducted with objective measurements and clinical outcomes collected with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Surgical data was collected for analysis. Objective measures obtained at follow-up included physical exam, strength testing using a handheld dynamometer, and Long-Head of the Biceps score. Clinical outcomes were measured using the following validated questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with mean age of 53.1 ± 10.1 years at the time of surgery were enrolled in the study. Mean follow-up time was 42.4 ± 16.9 months (range: 24 to 64 months). The postoperative LHB score was 95.5 ± 6.1 (range: 77 to 100). All functional outcome measures (ASES, DASH, and OSS) demonstrated statistically significant improvements at final follow-up (p < 0.05 for each). At total of 92.5% of patients stated they would have the procedure again if necessary. Mean elbow flexion strength on the operative side measured 98.7% ± 15.9% (range: 74.1% to 142.3%) of the contralateral arm. The mean LHB tendon diameter was 5.7 ± 0.8 mm and mean tunnel diameter was 5.9 ± 0.7 mm. There were no cases of intraoperative or postoperative fracture, infection, or Popeye deformity noted during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with cortical button fixation is a safe and effective surgical treatment option to relieve pain and restore function.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/surgery , Shoulder Injuries/surgery , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Tenodesis/methods , Adult , Arm Injuries/diagnosis , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Shoulder Fractures/etiology , Shoulder Injuries/diagnosis , Shoulder Injuries/physiopathology , Tendon Injuries/diagnosis , Tendon Injuries/physiopathology , Tenodesis/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
11.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(44): e17726, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31689814

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Pelnac and split-thickness skin graft for management of complex wound with underlying bone/tendon exposure at forearm and hand.This is a prospective study, beginning from March 2013 up to May 2017. There were 13 patients, with age of 31.2 years. All of them underwent the staged Pelnac and split-thickness skin graft to manage the complex wound with bone/tendon. Postoperatively, scheduled follow-up was conducted.The average follow-up was 15 months. There were no infections, wound necrosis, hematoma, or seroma during the phase when Pelnac was applied. There was 100% "take" of the Pelnac in 12/13 patients. In 11 patients, there was complete skin graft "take". Patients' satisfaction for the esthetic appearance of the grafted area was 75.0 ±â€Š8.5/100. The VSS value was 2.9 ±â€Š2.5. Regarding the sensory recovery, the response of "normal or near normal" could be obtained in 7/13 patients, "slight loss" in 5 patients and "significant loss" in 1 case. The average DASH score was 27.2 ±â€Š18.5, and most patients (12/13) could obtain an acceptable ability to perform the daily activities.Pelnac dermal template is a favorable alternative to flap reconstruction in the treatment of complex wound with underlying tissues exposure.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/surgery , Guided Tissue Regeneration/methods , Hand Injuries/surgery , Skin Transplantation/methods , Tendons/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Dermis/physiopathology , Dermis/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Forearm/surgery , Hand/surgery , Hand Injuries/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Surgical Flaps , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing/physiology , Young Adult
12.
Am J Sports Med ; 47(12): 2816-2820, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31424975

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of upper extremity injuries in baseball pitchers is increasing. Over the past decade, research has attempted to elucidate the cause of these injuries, focusing mainly on pitching arm mechanics with little examination of other important segments, such as the trunk. This is surprising, as trunk motion has been shown to have significant effects on pitching mechanics. PURPOSE: To determine the associations between trunk rotation, ball velocity, and the moments about the elbow joint. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Data collected using 3-dimensional motion analysis techniques from 99 collegiate pitchers (18.0-24.8 years) were analyzed. A random intercept mixed-effects regression model was used to determine if significant associations existed between trunk rotation and ball velocity or elbow varus moment. RESULTS: Significant associations were found between trunk rotation angle at ball release and elbow varus moment (P = .019, ß = 0.254) as well as ball velocity (P = .016, ß = 0.060). For every 10° increase over the average trunk rotation angle at ball release, the elbow varus moment increased by 2.54 N·m and the ball velocity increased by 0.60 m/s. Additionally, the maximum rotational velocity of the trunk was positively associated with elbow varus moment (P < .001, ß = 0.029) and ball velocity (P < .001, ß = 0.007). For every 100 deg/s increase over the average maximum rotational velocity of the trunk, the elbow varus moment increased by 2.90 N·m and the ball velocity increased by 0.70 m/s. CONCLUSION: In collegiate pitchers, trunk rotation angle at ball release was significantly associated with ball velocity and elbow varus moment. Also, an increase in maximum rotational velocity of the trunk was significantly associated with an increase in the ball velocity and elbow varus moment. This work demonstrates the importance of trunk mechanics in the kinetic chain of the pitch cycle. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pitching coaches and trainers can use the results to stress the importance of trunk mechanics in pitching, specifically, combining adequate core function with increased trunk rotational velocity in an effort to increase pitching velocity without increasing elbow joint stress.


Subject(s)
Baseball/physiology , Elbow/physiology , Torso/physiology , Adolescent , Arm/physiology , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Baseball/injuries , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Kinetics , Rotation , Sports Equipment , Time and Motion Studies , Universities , Young Adult
13.
Wounds ; 31(8): 213-218, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31298660

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Graft fixation is critical for the successful survival of a skin graft. Conventional mechanical fixation may induce inappropriate pressure and increase wound complications. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) could be utilized to secure a skin graft and improve drainage. Limited quantitative data exist on the efficacy of NPWT for skin grafting. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study compares the efficacy and complications between NPWT and conventional mechanical fixation in skin grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent skin graft surgery from January 2015 to December 2016 at a large university hospital in southwest China were retrospectively analyzed. Characteristics, including wound pattern, skin graft type, surgical procedure, survival rate, and postoperative complication, were statistically analyzed by Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients were included in the study; 72 received NPWT and 114 received conventional mechanical dressing fixation after skin grafting. Overall survival rate of full-thickness skin grafts was significantly higher in the NPWT group than the dressing group (P ⟨ .01). The NPWT group showed a higher survival rate than the dressing group for each anatomic site, but only patients who had skin grafts of the hand exhibited statistically significant results. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a quantitative analysis of the efficacy of NPWT on skin graft fixation with NPWT providing consistent pressure and better drainage than conventional mechanical fixation. In addition, the use of NPWT also could increase graft take on the hand region.


Subject(s)
Graft Survival/physiology , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Skin Transplantation/methods , Wound Healing/physiology , Adult , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Arm Injuries/surgery , Cicatrix, Hypertrophic/physiopathology , Cicatrix, Hypertrophic/surgery , Contracture/physiopathology , Contracture/surgery , Fasciitis, Necrotizing/physiopathology , Fasciitis, Necrotizing/surgery , Female , Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Fractures, Multiple/physiopathology , Fractures, Multiple/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
14.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 20(1): 256, 2019 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31138206

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Grip strength (GS) test is an essential aspect of clinical practice with patients with upper extremity injuries. The random error of GS test was hypothesized to be proportional to the level of GS. The purpose of the current study was to estimate a precise range for the measurement error of GS in patients following traumatic injuries in the upper extremity. METHODS: Following traumatic injuries in the upper extremity, 109 participants completed GS tests twice one weekend apart. The Bland-Altman plot analysis was adopted to estimate the precise limits of agreement with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The mean of three consecutive trials had a higher intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.974 (95% CI = 0.963, 0.982) than those of one trial and the mean of the first two trials in injured upper extremities. When GS was ≤20 kg, the upper limit of agreement with 95% CI was estimated as (0.41 × average GS + 1.24), while the lower limit was estimated as (- 0.41 × average GS - 0.39). A table of one-to-one matches between averaged GS ≤ 20 kg and transformed ranges of random errors with 95% certainty was created; the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change with 95% certainty of GS test were 1.8 and 4.9 kg, respectively. When GS was > 20 kg, the width of agreement with 95% CI ranged from - 4.9 to 5.3 kg, and the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change with 95% certainty were 1.8 and 5.1 kg, respectively. CONCLUSION: The one-to-one match table can be considered as a practical tool to judge a change in GS score is real or due to random errors when it is ≤20 kg.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/diagnosis , Hand Strength/physiology , Upper Extremity/injuries , Adult , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Arm Injuries/rehabilitation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Upper Extremity/physiopathology
15.
Burns ; 45(3): 554-559, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31018911

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Spain, the number of aged persons is increasing. By the year 2066, it is expected that 34.6% of the Spanish population will be over 65 years of age. Elderly people present a higher burning risk owing in part to impaired balance and decreased physical strength, lower cognitive abilities, or socioeconomic context. OBJECTIVE: Burns to the upper body body are common and affect both emotional state and physical function, thus leading to reduced quality of life (QoL). Our objective was to determine the influence of age on the QoL of patients who experienced burns to the upper body, with burns with 2 years. METHODS: This is an observational study with a sample of 58 patients with burns only on the upper body. Patients were divided into two groups: 29 patients of age over 65 years and 29 patients under 65 years; all of them attended the Vall d'Hebron Burn Center, Barcelona, between 2011 and 2014. From the original sample, 45 patients had survived by the time the information was gathered. The QoL of these individuals was evaluated with the Spanish version of the Burn Specific Health Scale. Demographic data (sex, age, total burn surface area [TBSA], burn mechanism, pathological history, length of hospital stay, and rehabilitation duration) were collected. Statistical analysis included parametric and nonparametric tests as appropriate with R3.3.3. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups regarding the mechanism of burn, TBSA, length of hospital stay, and the domains of QoL test. High blood pressure, diabetes, and other comorbidities were significantly more common in the elderly group than in the younger group. Eleven patients died in the elderly group and two in the younger group (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: As opposed to what could be expected, in this study, there were no significant differences between surviving patients in both age groups in terms of perceived QoL. Nevertheless, mortality after a burn in the upper side of the body was significantly higher in elderly people than in younger people. The present study results do not support the use of different rehabilitation approaches in elderly patients.


Subject(s)
Burns/physiopathology , Burns/psychology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arm Injuries/mortality , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Arm Injuries/psychology , Back Injuries/mortality , Back Injuries/physiopathology , Back Injuries/psychology , Burns/mortality , Facial Injuries/mortality , Facial Injuries/physiopathology , Facial Injuries/psychology , Female , Hand Injuries/mortality , Hand Injuries/physiopathology , Hand Injuries/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Injuries/mortality , Neck Injuries/physiopathology , Neck Injuries/psychology , Quality of Life , Spain , Thoracic Injuries/mortality , Thoracic Injuries/physiopathology , Thoracic Injuries/psychology , Torso/injuries , Young Adult
16.
J Hand Surg Am ; 44(11): 989.e1-989.e18, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30782436

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To help strategize efforts to optimize value (relative improvement in health for resources invested), we analyzed the factors associated with the cost of care and use of resources for painful, nontraumatic conditions of the upper extremity. METHODS: The following were the most common upper extremity diagnoses in the Truven Health MarketScan database: shoulder pain and rotator cuff tendinopathy, shoulder stiffness, shoulder arthritis, lateral epicondylitis, hand arthritis, trigger finger, wrist pain, and hand pain. Multivariable generalized linear regression models were constructed accounting for sex, age, employment status, enrollment year, payer type, emergency room visit, joint injection, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), physical or occupational therapy, outpatient and inpatient surgery, and insurance type. In addition, we assessed the use of the following 4 diagnostic and treatment interventions: joint injection, surgery, MRI, and physical or occupational therapy. RESULTS: Inpatient and outpatient surgery are the largest contributors to the total amount paid for most diagnoses. Older patients had more injections for the majority of conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve the value of care for nontraumatic upper extremity pain can focus on the relative benefits of surgery compared with other treatments and interventions to lower the costs of surgery (eg, office surgery and limited draping for minor hand surgery). TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic II.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Musculoskeletal Diseases/economics , Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Upper Extremity/surgery , Adult , Arm Injuries/epidemiology , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Arm Injuries/surgery , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/therapy , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Cost of Illness , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Pain Measurement , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Shoulder Pain/diagnosis , Shoulder Pain/economics , Shoulder Pain/epidemiology , Shoulder Pain/therapy , United States , Upper Extremity/physiopathology
17.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 35(5): 329-334, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30557895

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of flow-through flaps was popularized in the early 1990s by Costa, Soutar and Lamberty in cases where an arterial gap was present or a major artery of the limb was damaged. We hypothesized that flow-through flaps can be used in all extremity reconstruction cases, where there is an indication for a free-flap, irrespective of the existence of arterial defect due to its many advantages while not increasing the flap loss significantly. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed by examining patient status and surgery reports of all patients who underwent extremity reconstruction with a flow-through flap from January 2011 to January 2016. This procedure was applied to all the patients, irrespective of the presence of an arterial gap. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included. The most frequently used flaps were the anterolateral thigh flap and the latissimus dorsi flap. Reconstructions were either posttraumatic or after oncological resection. Two cases of flap loss were encountered. The mean total operating time was 480 ± 153 minutes. The mean follow-up was 10 ± 3 months. There were no donor-site wound complications. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, the flow-through flap technique can be considered a safe alternative to the end-to-side technique for complex extremity defect reconstruction irrespective of the vascular status. The additional arterial anastomosis, even in the absence of an arterial gap or a vascular compromised extremity, did not increase the complication rate in the hands of experienced microsurgeons.


Subject(s)
Arteries/surgery , Free Tissue Flaps/blood supply , Microsurgery , Perforator Flap/blood supply , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Soft Tissue Injuries/surgery , Adult , Aged , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Arm Injuries/surgery , Arteries/injuries , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Free Tissue Flaps/transplantation , Graft Survival/physiology , Humans , Leg Injuries/physiopathology , Leg Injuries/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Perforator Flap/transplantation , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Soft Tissue Injuries/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
18.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med ; 62(3): 155-160, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30562576

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of the French version of the Hand Function Sort questionnaire (HFS-F). As a comparison, the MCID of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) was also estimated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included French-speaking patients hospitalized in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic pain of the upper limb after an accident. HFS-F and DASH scores were collected at admission and discharge; the Patient Global Impression of Change measure (PGIC; 7 levels) was collected at discharge. The MCID was estimated by 2 methods: the anchor-based method (receiver operating characteristic [ROC], delta (Δ) mean of scores) and the objective method based on the distribution of scores (standard error of measurement, SEM). RESULT: We included 225 patients. By the anchor-based method, the MCID for the HFS-F and DASH was +26 (SD 35) (P<10-4) and -13 (SD 13) (P<10-4), respectively, and by the ROC curve, it was +10 to +12 for the Δ-HFS-F and -7.5 to -5 for the Δ-DASH. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.726 [0.638-0.781] for Δ-HFS-F and 0.768 [0.701-0.83] for Δ-DASH. The correlations between the anchor and delta scores were>0.38 (P<10-4). The SEM was 16.2 for the HFS-F and -4.3 for the DASH. CONCLUSIONS: Values below the SEM must be rejected. Our anchor was significantly correlated with the outcome. Therefore, we propose an MCID for the HFS-F of 26, corresponding to approximately 10% progression of the score.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/rehabilitation , Disability Evaluation , Minimal Clinically Important Difference , Rehabilitation, Vocational , Shoulder Injuries/rehabilitation , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recovery of Function , Shoulder Injuries/physiopathology
19.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 19(1): 364, 2018 Oct 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30305070

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps tendon rupture occurs more often in middle-aged male population, involving the dominant arm. In this retrospective study, it's been described the occurrence of the most frequent adverse events and the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing surgical repair of distal biceps tendon rupture with the modified Morrey's double-incision approach, to determine better indications for patients with acute tendon injury. METHODS: Sixty-three patients with acute distal biceps tendon rupture treated with a modified double-incision technique between 2003 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated at a mean 24 months of follow-up. Clinical evaluation including range of motion (ROM) and isometric strength recovery compared to the healthy contralateral side assessment, together with documentation of nerve injury, was performed. Patients were asked to answer DASH, OES and MEPS scores. RESULTS: The ROM recovery showed excellent results compared to the healthy contralateral side. The reported major complications included: one case of proximal radio-ulnar synostosis, 3 cases of posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) palsy and one case of a-traumatic tendon re-rupture. Concerning minor complications, intermittent pain, ROM deficiency < 30° in flexion/extension and pronation/supination, isometric flexion strength deficiency < 30% and isometric supination strength deficiency < 60%, lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACBN) injury, were observed. The average DASH score was 8.5; the average OES was 41.5 and the MEPS was 96.3. CONCLUSION: The Morrey modified double-incision technique finds its indication in young and active patients if performed within 2 weeks from injury. If performed by experienced surgeons, the advantages can exceed the drawbacks of possible complications.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/surgery , Elbow Joint/surgery , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Replantation , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Adult , Aged , Arm Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Elbow Joint/diagnostic imaging , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Range of Motion, Articular , Recovery of Function , Replantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tendon Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Tendon Injuries/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Elbow Injuries
20.
Am J Sports Med ; 46(12): 3002-3006, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30215544

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Elbow injuries among adolescent baseball players have been outpacing those of college and professional players. In attempts to prevent injuries and maximize return-to-play potential following injury, attention has been focused on "return to throw" programs, which include long-toss throws. Because the few studies that were conducted on long-toss throwing focused primarily on college-aged athletes, it is not known what type of load is incurred at the elbow during interval throwing progression among high school baseball players. PURPOSE: To quantify the change in arm slot, arm speed, shoulder external rotation, and elbow varus torque across increasing throwing distances within a given athlete. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Ninety-five high school baseball players performed a long-toss protocol while wearing an inertial sensor and sleeve. Each participant was tested for 5 throws at distances of 9 m, 18 m, 27 m, 37 m, and 46 m. Linear mixed-effects models and likelihood ratio tests were used to estimate the within-participant relationship between throw distance and arm slot, arm speed, shoulder external rotation, and elbow varus torque. RESULTS: Arm slot ( P < .01), arm speed ( P < .01), shoulder external rotation ( P < .01), and elbow varus torque ( P < .01) were significantly associated with long-toss throw distance. As the throw distance increased, there was an increase in arm speed and shoulder external rotation and a decrease in arm slot for each distance. However, elbow varus torque increased with each distance up to 37 m and then remained the same at 46 m. CONCLUSION: The use of longer distances for conditioning and rehabilitation may be beneficial in increasing shoulder range of motion and arm speed; however, precaution needs to be taken, as throwing longer distances are accompanied by an increase in arm rotation, arm speed, and elbow torque, with a decrease in arm slot. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Return-to-throw programs have been utilized by sports medicine clinicians and coaches to help guide a player during rehabilitation. These programs involve throwing at increased efforts through increased distances with no immediate feedback on elbow stress. This investigation describes arm biomechanical changes during submaximum interval throwing and demonstrates a tool that can be utilized to measure arm stress in real time for clinicians and athletes progressing through an interval throwing program.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/physiopathology , Arm/physiopathology , Baseball/injuries , Elbow Injuries , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Adolescent , Arm Injuries/rehabilitation , Biomechanical Phenomena , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Torque
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...