Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular therapy versus open surgical repair for the traumatic lower extremity arterial injury.

OBJECTIVE: For traumatic lower extremity artery injury, it is unclear whether it is better to perform endovascular therapy (ET) or open surgical repair (OSR). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ET versus OSR for traumatic lower extremity artery injury. METHODS: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for studies. Cohort studies and case series reporting outcomes of ET or OSR were eligible for inclusion. Robins-I tool and an 18-item tool were used to assess the risk of bias. The primary outcome was amputation. The secondary outcomes included fasciotomy or compartment syndrome, mortality, length of stay and lower extremity nerve injury. We used the random effects model to calculate pooled estimates. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies with low or moderate risk of bias were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that patients who underwent ET had a significantly decreased risk of major amputation (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.85; I2=34%) and fasciotomy or compartment syndrome (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.20-0.50, I2 = 14%) than patients who underwent OSR. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding all-cause mortality (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.75-1.64, I2 = 31%). Patients with ET repair had a shorter length of stay than patients with OSR repair (MD=-5.06, 95% CI -6.76 to -3.36, I2 = 65%). Intraoperative nerve injury was just reported in OSR patients with a pooled incidence of 15% (95% CI 6%-27%). CONCLUSION: Endovascular therapy may represent a better choice for patients with traumatic lower extremity arterial injury, because it can provide lower risks of amputation, fasciotomy or compartment syndrome, and nerve injury, as well as shorter length of stay.

Peroneal artery injury potential due to different syndesmosis screw placement options: a simulation study with lower extremity computed tomography angiography.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to assess the risk of peroneal artery injury of hardware placement at the fixation of syndesmotic injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The lower extremity computed tomography angiography was used to design the study. The syndesmosis screw placement range was simulated every 0.5 cm, from 0.5 to 5 cm proximal to the ankle joint. The screw axes were drawn as 20°, 30° or individual angle according to the femoral epicondylar axis. The proximity between the screw axis and the peroneal artery was measured in millimeters. Potential peroneal artery injury was noted if the distance between the peroneal artery to the axis of the simulated screw was within the outer shaft radius of the simulated screw. The Pearson chi-square test was used and a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The potential for injury to the peroneal artery increased as the syndesmosis screw level rose proximally from the ankle joint level or as the diameter of the syndesmosis screw increasds. In terms of syndesmosis screw trajection, the lowest risk of injury was observed with the syndesmosis screw angle of 20°. Simulations with a screw diameter of 3.5 mm exhibited the least potential for peroneal artery injury. CONCLUSION: Thanks to this radiological anatomy simulation study, we believe that we have increased the awareness of the peroneal artery potential in syndesmosis screw application. Each syndesmosis screw placement option may have different potential for injury to the peroneal artery. To decrease the peroneal artery injury potential, we recommend the followings. If individual syndesmosis screw angle trajection can be measured, place the screw 1.5 cm proximal to the ankle joint using a 3.5 mm screw shaft. If not, fix it with 30° trajection regardless of the screw diameter at the same level. If the most important issue is the peroneal artery circulation, use the screw level up to 1 cm proximal to the ankle joint regardless of the screw angle trajection and screw diameter.

Emergency vascular repairs in trauma: Predictors of poor prognosis and a novel scoring system.

BACKGROUND: Vascular injuries comprise 1% to 4% of all trauma patients, and there are no widely used risk-stratification tools. We sought to establish predictors of revascularization failures and compare outcomes of trauma and vascular surgeons. METHODS: We performed a single-institution, case-control study of consecutive patients with traumatic arterial injuries who underwent open repair between 2016 and 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate covariates impacting the primary composite outcome of repair failure/revision, amputation, or in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 165 patients, the median age was 34 years, 149 (90%) were male, and 99 (60%) suffered penetrating injury. Popliteal (46%) and superficial femoral (44%) arterial injuries were most common. Interposition graft/bypass was the most frequent repair (n = 107 [65%]). Revascularization failure was observed in 24 patients (15%). Compared with trauma surgeons, vascular surgeons more frequently repaired blunt injuries (66% vs. 20%, p < 0.001), anterior tibial (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.012), or tibioperoneal injuries (28% vs. 4%, p < 0.001), with a below-knee bypass (38% vs. 20%, p = 0.019). Revascularization failure occurred in 10% (9 of 93) of repairs by trauma surgeons and 21% (13 of 61) of repairs by vascular surgeons. Mangled Extremity Severity Score >8 (odds ratio, 15.6; 95% confidence interval, 4.4-55.9; p < 0.001) and concomitant laparotomy or orthopedic procedure (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-28.6; p = 0.010) were independently associated with revascularization failure. A novel composite scoring system (UT Houston Score) was developed by combining Mangled Extremity Severity Score, concomitant procedure, mechanism of injury, and injury location. This score demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% with a score of 0 and a specificity of 95% with a score of >3. CONCLUSION: After traumatic arterial injury, trauma surgeons repaired less-complex injuries but with fewer revascularization failures than vascular surgeons. The UT Houston Score may be used to risk stratify patients to determine who may benefit from vascular surgery consultation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

The injury patterns, management and outcomes of retroperitoneal haemorrhage caused by lumbar arterial bleeding at a Level-1 Trauma Centre: A 10-year retrospective review.

PURPOSE: Haemorrhagic shock remains a leading preventable cause of death amongst trauma patients. Failure to identify retroperitoneal haemorrhage (RPH) can lead to irreversible haemorrhagic shock. The arteries of the middle retroperitoneal region (i.e., the 1st to 4th lumbar arteries) are complicit in haemorrhage into the retroperitoneal space. However, predictive injury patterns and subsequent management implications of haemorrhage secondary to bleeding of these arteries is lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with retroperitoneal haemorrhage who presented to our Level-1 Trauma Centre (2009-2019). We described the associated injuries, management and outcomes relating to haemorrhage of lumbar arteries (L1-4) from this cohort to assess risk and management priorities in non-cavitary haemorrhage compared to RPH due to other causes. RESULTS: Haemorrhage of the lumbar arteries (LA) is associated with a higher proportion of lumbar transverse process (TP) fractures. Bleeding from branches of these vessels is associated with lower systolic blood pressure, increased incidence of massive transfusion, higher shock index, and a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS). A higher proportion of patients in the LA group underwent angioembolisation when compared to other causes of RPH. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the injury patterns, particularly TP fractures, in the prediction, early detection and management of haemorrhage from the lumbar arteries (L1-4). Compared to other causes of RPH, bleeding of the LA responds to early, aggressive haemorrhage control through angioembolisation. These injuries are likely best treated in Level-1 or Level-2 trauma facilities that are equipped with angioembolisation facilities or hybrid theatres to facilitate early identification and management of thoracolumbar bleeds.

Injury patterns, management and outcomes of retroperitoneal haemorrhage caused by lower intercostal arterial bleeding at a level-1 trauma centre: A 10-year retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE: Haemorrhagic shock is a life-threatening complication of trauma, but remains a preventable cause of death. Early recognition of retroperitoneal haemorrhage (RPH) is crucial in preventing deleterious outcomes including mortality. Injury to the 9-11th intercostal arteries (i.e. arteries of the lower thoracic region) are complicit in RPH. However, the associated injuries, implications and management of such bleeds remain poorly characterised. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients diagnosed with RPH who presented to our level-1 trauma centre (2009-2019). We described the associated injuries, management and outcomes relating to RPH of the lower thoracic region (the 9-11th intercostal arteries) from this cohort to identify potential predictors and evaluate the impact of early identification and management of non-cavitary bleeds. RESULTS: Haemorrhage of the lower intercostal arteries (LIA) into the retroperitoneal space is associated with an increased number of posterior lower rib fractures and pneumothorax/haemothorax. A higher proportion of patients in the LIA group required massive transfusion, angioembolisation or surgical ligation when compared to other causes of RPH. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the importance of injury patterns, particularly posterior lower rib fractures, as predictors for early recognition and management of RPH in the prevention of deleterious patient outcomes. RPH secondary to bleeding of the LIA may require early and aggressive management of haemorrhage through massive transfusion, and angioembolisation or surgical ligation when compared to RPH because of other causes.

Peripheral vascular trauma - basic management, diagnosis and treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral vascular injuries occur in 1-3% of all traumas in civilian settings. The management of these injuries is often based on experience derived from war medicine where these injuries are more common. The goal of this article is to summarize basic guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of vascular injuries. METHODS: Western Trauma Association (WTA) and Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) both have their own guidelines for vascular trauma management. RESULTS: Vascular injuries occur both in penetrating and blunt traumas. Complete vessel disruption occurs more frequently in penetrating traumas. In the case of blunt trauma, intimal defects are more common, resulting in dissection, false aneurysm, or intramural hematoma. The limb is mostly endangered due to ischemia, reperfusion injury and the compartment syndrome. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are paramount. Vascular trauma management is part of the ATLS protocol and life-over-limb principle. The primary goal is to stop the massive external bleeding. Clinical examination and CT angiography are the most helpful for the diagnosis. Surgical revision is indicated when hard signs are present. This can be a damage control surgery with the primary goal to stop the bleeding as quickly as possible. A shunt can be used for temporary reperfusion of the limb. Definitive treatment can take the form of a simple suture, patches or graft interposition; both prosthetic and autologous grafts are used. Sufficient debridement and fasciotomy are important steps in the therapy. In some cases, endovascular treatment can be used. CONCLUSION: Over the last century, the treatment strategy changed dramatically. Data from recent military conflicts show a decrease in amputation rates, and limb salvage has become a standard.

Traumatic arterial injuries in upper and lower limbs: what every radiologist should know.

Traumatic arterial injuries of the extremities are a rare but potentially fatal event. Computed tomography (CT) angiography of the extremities has become the technique of choice and can provide rapid accurate detection and characterization of vascular lesions. Vascular injuries can be classified in active hemorrhage, vasospasm, occlusion, post-traumatic arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, and patterns of intimal injuries. The learning objectives of this pictorial essay are to review the normal arterial anatomy of the upper and lower limbs, describe the technique of CT angiography in vascular trauma of the extremities, describe and illustrate the CT-angiography findings of traumatic arterial injuries, and know the potential pitfalls when interpreting a CT-angiography of the extremities.

Lumbar Artery Injury Related to Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion.

A 75-year-old woman underwent L4-L5 lateral interbody fusion for L4-5 foraminal stenosis with the use of percutaneous pedicle screws. On the day after the surgery, she was in shock. Emergency contrast-enhanced CT showed active extravasation from the 4th lumbar artery with a transverse process fracture. A radiologist performed a successful transarterial embolization, and the patient then began walking training on the 4th day post-surgery. Close attention should be paid to the insertion of a percutaneous pedicle screw, as it may cause a lumbar artery injury; in such a case, transarterial embolization is the preferred treatment.

Timing is everything: Impact of combined long bone fracture and major arterial injury on outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Timing of extremity fracture fixation in patients with an associated major vascular injury remains controversial. Some favor temporary fracture fixation before definitive vascular repair to limit potential graft complications. Others advocate immediate revascularization to minimize ischemic time. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the timing of fracture fixation on outcomes in patients with concomitant long bone fracture and major arterial injury. METHODS: Patients with a combined long bone fracture and major arterial injury in the same extremity requiring operative repair over 11 years were identified and stratified by timing of fracture fixation. Vascular-related morbidity (rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury, graft failure, extremity amputation) and mortality were compared between patients who underwent fracture fixation prerevascularization (PRE) or postrevascularization (POST). RESULTS: One hundred four patients were identified: 19 PRE and 85 POST. Both groups were similar with respect to age, sex, Injury Severity Score, admission base excess, 24-hour packed red blood cells, and concomitant venous injury. The PRE group had fewer penetrating injuries (32% vs. 60%, p = 0.024) and a longer time to revascularization (9.5 vs. 5.8 hours, p = 0.0002). Although there was no difference in mortality (0% vs. 2%, p > 0.99), there were more vascular-related complications in the PRE group (58% vs. 32%, p = 0.03): specifically, rhabdomyolysis (42% vs. 19%, p = 0.029), graft failure (26% vs. 8%, p = 0.026), and extremity amputation (37% vs. 13%, p = 0.013). Multivariable logistic regression identified fracture fixation PRE as the only independent predictor of graft failure (odds ratio, 3.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-14.33; p = 0.03) and extremity amputation (odds ratio, 3.924; 95% confidence interval, 1.272-12.111; p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Fracture fixation before revascularization contributes to increased vascular-related morbidity and was consistently identified as the only modifiable risk factor for both graft failure and extremity amputation in patients with a combined long bone fracture and major arterial injury. For these patients, delaying temporary or definitive fracture fixation until POST should be the preferred approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level IV.

Endothelial Progenitor Cells Modulate the Phenotype of Smooth Muscle Cells and Increase Their Neointimal Accumulation Following Vascular Injury.

BACKGROUND: Smooth muscle cells (SMCs) are the main driver of neointima formation and restenosis following vascular injury. In animal models, endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) accelerate endothelial regeneration and reduce neointima formation after arterial injury; however, EPC-capture stents do not reduce target vessel failure compared with conventional stents. Here we examined the influence of EPCs on features of SMCs pivotal for their impact on injury-induced neointima formation including proliferation, migration, and phenotype switch. METHODS AND RESULTS: EPCs, their conditioned medium, and EPC-derived microparticles induced proliferation of SMCs while limiting their apoptosis. In transwell membrane experiments and scratch assays, EPCs stimulated migration of SMCs and accelerated their recovery from scratch-induced injury. Treatment of SMCs with an EPC-derived conditioned medium or microparticles triggered transformation of SMCs toward a synthetic phenotype. However, co-cultivation of EPCs and SMCs enabling direct cell-cell contacts preserved their original phenotype and protected from the transformative effect of SMC cholesterol loading. Adhesion of EPCs to SMCs was stimulated by SMC injury and reduced by blocking CXCR2 and CCR5. Interaction of EPCs with SMCs modulated their secretory products and synergistically increased the release of selected chemokines. Following carotid wire injury in athymic mice, injection of EPCs resulted not only in reduced neointima formation but also in altered cellular composition of the neointima with augmented accumulation of SMCs. CONCLUSION: EPCs stimulate proliferation and migration of SMCs and increase their neointimal accumulation following vascular injury. Furthermore, EPCs context-dependently modify the SMC phenotype with protection from the transformative effect of cholesterol when a direct cell-cell contact is established.

In-hospital outcomes in autogenous vein versus synthetic graft interposition for traumatic arterial injury: A propensity-matched cohort from PROOVIT.

BACKGROUND: The ideal conduit for traumatic arterial repair is controversial. Autologous vein was compared with synthetic interposition grafts in the acute setting. The primary outcome was in-hospital reoperation or endovascular intervention. METHODS: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment registry from November 2013 to January 2019 was queried for arterial injuries requiring interposition vein or graft repair. Patients with no recorded Injury Severity Score were excluded, and multiple imputation was used for other missing data. Patients treated with synthetic grafts (SGs) were propensity matched to patients with vein grafts (VGs) to account for preoperative differences. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty from 19 institutions were identified, with 402 undergoing VG and 58 SG. In the SG group, 45 were PTFE grafts, 5 were Dacron, and 8 had other conduits. The SG group was more severely injured at admission with more gunshot wounds and higher mean Injury Severity Score, lactate, and first-24-hour transfusion requirement. In addition, the SG cohort had significantly lower admission systolic blood pressure, pH, and hemoglobin. After propensity matching, 51 patients with SG were matched with 87 patients with VG. There were no differences in demographics, clinical parameters, or diagnostic evaluation techniques postmatch. The need for reoperation or endovascular intervention between the matched groups was equivalent (18%; p = 0.8). There was no difference in any secondary outcome including thrombosis, stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, infection, or embolic event, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay were the same. CONCLUSION: American Association for the Surgery of Trauma PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment registry data demonstrate that SGs are used in more critically ill patients. After controlling for relevant clinical factors and propensity matching, there is no in-hospital difference in rate of reoperation or endovascular intervention, or any secondary outcome between VG and SG. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiolgic, Level III.

The reliability of physical examination in diagnosing arterial injury in penetrating trauma to extremities: A first look at different anatomical regions and injury mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of physical examination to exclude arterial injury in penetrating trauma to extremities has been well established. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the accuracy of physical examination to exclude arterial injury is similar to that of a computed tomography arteriogram (CTA) for different anatomical regions and mechanisms of injury, and in patients with concomitant fractures compared with those without. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who underwent CTA for penetrating injuries to an extremity between 1 June 2016 and 30 June 2017. The presence of arterial injuries was noted, and these were grouped into anatomical areas. Clinical notes were reviewed for the presence of hard signs of arterial injury at initial examination. RESULTS: A total of 220 lower limb and 133 upper limb CTAs were included. The mean patient age was 28.9 years (range 11 - 68). The overall sensitivity of physical examination in detecting a CTA-confirmed arterial injury was 95.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 88.4 - 98.7), with a specificity of 93.9% (95% CI 90.2 - 96.4). Physical examination of the thigh had the highest specificity of 96.4% (95% CI 91.8 - 98.8), followed by the lower leg at 94.4% (95% CI 81.3 - 99.3), the upper arm at 89.6% (95% CI 79.7 - 95.7) and the forearm at 77.8% (95% CI 40.0 - 97.2). For gunshot wounds the specificity was 96.1% (95% CI 92.4 - 98.3), while for stab wounds it was 86.8% (95% CI 74.7 - 94.5). CONCLUSIONS: This study agrees with current literature indicating that physical examination has high specificity in detecting arterial injury in the setting of penetrating trauma to an extremity. However, it shows that the specificity is not equal for all anatomical regions or mechanisms of injury.

Factores asociados al síndrome de Wellens en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST / Factors associated to Wellens' syndrome in patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation

Introducción: El síndrome de Wellens constituye un equivalente del síndrome coronario agudo con elevación del segmento ST. Este incluye dos patrones electrocardiográficos que sugieren lesión crítica de la arteria descendente anterior. Objetivo: Evaluar probables factores asociados al síndrome de Wellens en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST y lesiones coronarias significativas en la arteria descendente anterior. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, analítico, transversal en pacientes con diagnóstico de síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del ST y lesión significativa en la arteria descendente anterior, comprobada mediante coronariografía, ingresados en la unidad de cuidados coronarios intensivos del Hospital Clínico-Quirúrgico Manuel Fajardo entre el 2016 y 2019. Resultados: La edad media fue de 66 años, predominó el sexo masculino (53,9 por ciento) y el antecedente de hipertensión arterial (89,5 por ciento). Los pacientes con síndrome de Wellens tuvieron un significativo menor porcentaje de antecedente de cardiopatía isquémica (58,1 por ciento vs. 84,8 por ciento; p = 0,012). Además, el síndrome arrojó asociación estadísticamente muy significativa con la condición de fumador activo (51,2 por ciento vs. 15,2 por ciento; p < 0,01). No se encontró relación estadística significativa entre el síndrome de Wellens y el resultado angiográfico. Conclusiones: La presencia de los patrones electrocardiográficos del síndrome de Wellens se asocia con el hábito tabáquico en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST y lesiones coronarias en la arteria descendente anterior, y su ausencia se asocia con el antecedente de cardiopatía isquémica en el mismo subgrupo de individuos(AU)

Introduction: Wellens' syndrome is equivalent to acute coronary syndrome with ST-segment elevation. It includes two electrocardiographic patterns suggesting a critical lesion in the anterior descending artery. Objective: Evaluate probable factors associated to Wellens' syndrome in patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation and significant coronary lesions in the anterior descending artery. Methods: A cross-sectional observational analytical study was conducted of patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation and significant lesion in the anterior descending artery verified by coronary arteriography, admitted to the intensive coronary care unit at Manuel Fajardo Clinical Surgical Hospital in the period 2016-2019. Results: Mean age was 66 years, with a predominance of the male sex (53.9 percent) and a history of hypertension (89.5 percent). Patients with Wellens' syndrome had a significantly lower percentage of ischemic heart disease antecedents (58.1 percent vs. 84.8 percent; p = 0.012). A very significant statistical association was observed between the syndrome and active smoking (51.2 percent vs. 15.2 percent; p < 0.01). A significant statistical relationship was not found between Wellens' syndrome and angiographic results. Conclusions: The presence of electrocardiographic patterns of Wellens' syndrome is associated to smoking in patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation and coronary lesions in the anterior descending artery, whereas their absence is associated to a history of ischemic heart disease in the same subgroup of individuals(AU)

Terapia endovascular en trauma periférico: una alternativa a la cirugía abierta tradicional / Endovascular therapy in peripheral trauma: our experience

Resumen Introducción: La terapia endovascular ha demostrado ser una buena alternativa de tratamiento en las enfermedades arteriales y venosas. Asimismo, en trauma vascular periférico constituye una excelente opción, especialmente en sitios anatómicos difíciles de acceder y con lesiones complejas como seudoaneurismas, fístulas arteriovenosas (FAV) o la combinación de ambos, con numerosas ventajas. Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados del tratamiento endovascular en trauma vascular penetrante por agresiones y iatrogenias. Materiales y Método: Revisión retrospectiva de todos los pacientes con trauma vascular periférico sometidos a terapia endovascular. Resultados: Entre abril de 2011 y mayo de 2020 se trataron 30 pacientes, 28 hombres y 2 mujeres. Con edades fluctuantes entre 17 y 84 años. La causa del trauma fue 20 penetrantes y 10 iatrogenias. Los vasos afectados fueron arteria femoral superficial 6, femoral profunda 2, subclavia 9, axilar 1, poplítea 4, ilíacas 1, peronea 1, tibial anterior 5, tronco venoso braquiocefálico 1. Diecisiete pacientes fueron tratados con endoprótesis, 9 con embolización y 4 con cierre percutáneo en relación con catéteres arteriales en subclavia. No hubo mortalidad, pero dos pacientes requirieron reparación abierta: un seudoaneurisma poplíteo gigante y un seudoaneurisma de tibial anterior, en ambos se constató sección completa de ambas arterias. El seguimiento clínico ha sido entre 30 días y 3 años. Conclusiones: En esta serie de casos, la terapia endovascular en lesiones de trauma vascular periférico ofrece excelentes resultados con baja morbimortalidad y permeabilidad aceptable a corto y mediano plazo.

Introduction: Endovascular therapy has proven to be a good treatment alternative in arterial and venous diseases. Likewise, in peripheral vascular trauma it is an excellent option, especially in anatomical sites that are difficult to access and with complex lesions such as pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) or the combination of both, with numerous advantages. Aim: To evaluate the results of endovascular treatment in trauma Penetrating vascular injury and iatrogenesis. Materials and Method: Retrospective review of all patients with peripheral vascular trauma undergoing endovascular therapy. Results: Between April 2011 and May 2020, 30 patients were treated, 28 men and 2 women. With fluctuating ages between 17 and 84 years. The cause of the trauma was 20 penetrating and 10 iatrogenic. The affected vessels were superficial femoral artery 6, deep femoral 2, subclavian 9, axillary 1, popliteal 4, iliac 1, peroneal 1, anterior tibial 5, brachiocephalic venous trunk 1. Seventeen patients were treated with endoprosthesis, 9 with embolization and 4 with percutaneous closure in relation to arterial catheters in the subclavian. There was no mortality but two patients required open repair: a giant popliteal pseudoaneurysm and an anterior tibial pseudoaneurysm in which both sections of both arteries were found to be complete. Clinical follow-up was between 30 days and 3 years. Conclusión: In this serie, endovascular therapy in peripheral vascular trauma lesions offers excellent results with low morbidity and mortality and acceptable patency in the short and medium term.

Posterior Wall Acetabulum Fracture with a Persistent Sciatic Artery: A Case Report.

CASE: We report the case of a patient who sustained a left posterior wall acetabular fracture with an ipsilateral persistent sciatic artery (PSA). The PSA was diagnosed preoperatively on lower extremity computed tomography angiogram. He was treated with open reduction internal fixation through a Kocher-Langenbeck approach. The PSA and sciatic nerve were identified and protected throughout the case. There were no neurovascular complications. CONCLUSION: PSA in the setting of posterior wall acetabulum fractures has not been reported previously. Orthopaedic surgeons who treat these injuries should be aware of PSA anatomic variants so that they can be identified and protected during surgery.

Factors Affecting the Re-Endothelialization of Endothelial Progenitor Cell.

The vascular endothelium, which plays an essential role in maintaining the normal shape and function of blood vessels, is a natural barrier between the circulating blood and the vascular wall tissue. The endothelial damage can cause vascular lesions, such as atherosclerosis and restenosis. After the vascular intima injury, the body starts the endothelial repair (re-endothelialization) to inhibit the neointimal hyperplasia. Endothelial progenitor cell is the precursor of endothelial cells and plays an important role in the vascular re-endothelialization. However, re-endothelialization is inevitably affected in vivo and in vitro by factors, which can be divided into two types, namely, promotion and inhibition, and act on different links of the vascular re-endothelialization. This article reviews these factors and related mechanisms.