Midterm results of radiocapitellar arthroplasty of the elbow: a multicentre prospective study on two different implants.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze the results of two radiocapitellar prostheses in a large case series followed prospectively, with medium-term follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 31 patients with a mean age of 54 years (27 to 73) were analyzed; nine had primary osteoarthritis (OA) and 17 had post-traumatic OA, three had capitellar osteonecrosis, and two had a fracture. Overall, 17 Lateral Resurfacing Elbow (LRE) and 14 Uni-Elbow Radio-Capitellum Implant (UNI-E) arthroplasties were performed. Pre- and postoperative assessment involved the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and the modified American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (m-ASES) score. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 6.8 years (3.8 to 11.5). The mean MEPS, m-ASES, and Q-DASH scores improved significantly by 50 (p < 0.001), 55 (p < 0.001), and 54 points (p < 0.001), respectively, with no differences being detected between the implants. Preoperative pronation and supination were worse in patients in whom the UNI-E was used. Two patients with the UNI-E implant had asymptomatic evidence of gross loosening. CONCLUSION: Radiocapitellar arthroplasty yielded a significant improvement in elbow function at a mean follow-up of 6.8 years, with a high implant survival rate when the LRE was used in patients with primary or post-traumatic OA, without radial head deformity, and when the UNI-E was used in patients in whom radial head excision was indicated. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1362-1369.

Artroplastia total de codo para el tratamiento de fracturas del húmero distal / Total elbow arthroplasty for the treatment of distal humeral fractures

Objetivo. Reportar los resultados clínico-radiológicos del tratamiento de las fracturas del húmero distal (FHD) con prótesis total de codo. Material y métodos. Este trabajo retrospectivo fue realizado en 2 centros quirúrgicos. Se incluyeron: pacientes con FHD, operados con prótesis total de Coonrad-Morrey y con seguimiento > 1 año. Se incluyeron 23 pacientes. Veintiuno de los pacientes eran mujeres con una edad promedio de 79 años. Según la clasificación AO, las fracturas eran: 15 del tipo C3, 7 del tipo C2 y una A2. Todos los pacientes fueron operados sin desinserción del aparato extensor. El seguimiento promedio fue de 40 meses. Resultados. La flexoextensión fue de 123-17°, con un arco de movilidad de 106° (un 80% con respecto al lado sano). El dolor según EVA fue de un punto. El SCM promedio fue de 83 puntos: 8 pacientes tuvieron resultados excelentes, 13 buenos, uno regular y otro malo. El DASH promedio fue de 24 puntos. No se evidenciaron aflojamientos en 15 pacientes. Se observaron 10 complicaciones: 2 desgastes del polietileno, un desensamble protésico, 3 parestesias postoperatorias del nervio cubital, una necrosis de piel que necesitó un colgajo braquial, 2 aflojamientos protésicos, y una falsa vía intraoperatoria. Conclusiones. El tratamiento de FHD con prótesis total de codo puede ofrecer una opción razonable de tratamiento, pero las indicaciones deben estar limitadas a fracturas complejas donde la fijación interna puede ser precaria, en pacientes con osteoporosis y con baja demanda funcional. En pacientes jóvenes la utilización está limitada a casos graves donde no exista otra opción de tratamiento. Nivel de evidencia. Nivel de evidencia IV (AU)

Objective. To report the clinical-functional outcomes of the treatment of humeral distal fractures with a total elbow prosthesis. Material and methods. This retrospective study was performed in two surgical centres. A total of 23 patients were included, with a mean age of 79 years, and of which 21 were women. The inclusion criteria were: patients with humeral distal fractures, operated on using a Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis, and with a follow-up of more than one year. According to AO classification, 15 fractures were type C3, 7 C2 and 1 A2. All patients were operated on without de-insertion of the extensor mechanism. The mean follow-up was 40 months. Results. Flexor-extension was 123-17°, with a total mobility arc of 106° (80% of the contralateral side). Pain, according to a visual analogue scale was 1. The Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) was 83 points. Excellent results were obtained in 8 patients, good in 13, medium in 1, and poor in 1. The mean DASH (disability) score was 24 points. Conclusion. Treatment of humeral distal fractures with total elbow arthroplasty could be a good treatment option, but indications must be limited to patients with complex fractures, poor bone quality, with osteoporosis and low functional demands. In younger patients, the use is limited to serious cases where there is no other treatment option. Level of Evidence. Level of Evidence IV (AU)

Responsiveness of five outcome measurement instruments in total elbow arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify and compare the sensitivity to change of 5 outcome instruments for the elbow joint. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study (n = 65), outcome was measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH), the modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire for the elbow, patient part (pmASES) and examiner/clinical part (cmASES), and the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation form (PREE). Responsiveness was quantified by the effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) before and 6 months after total elbow arthroplasty. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the instruments' ability to classify effects into global health change assessment categories. RESULTS: For the total scores, the ES were 1.50 for the PREE, 1.32 for the pmASES, 0.86 for the cmASES, 0.56 for the DASH, and 0.11 for the SF-36 (P ≤ 0.002 for all differences, except the cmASES and DASH). The same order was found within the subdomains of pain/symptoms and function and remained consistent when using the SRM and in ROC curve analysis. PREE total (area under the ROC curve 0.68), DASH function, and pmASES total and pain (area under the ROC curve range 0.64-0.67) discriminated best between "much better" and the other categories. CONCLUSION: The PREE was the most responsive instrument and can be recommended for every set of measures for elbow joint disorders. The pmASES was slightly less responsive but is a valid alternative. The examiner-assessed cmASES is affected by concerns regarding validity and was relatively less responsive. The DASH for comprehensive measurement of the entire upper extremity and the SF-36 for chronic pain conditions complete the assessment set.

Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets.

In a systematic review, reports from national registers and clinical studies were identified and analysed with respect to revision rates after joint replacement, which were calculated as revisions per 100 observed component years. After primary hip replacement, a mean of 1.29 revisions per 100 observed component years was seen. The results after primary total knee replacement are 1.26 revisions per 100 observed component years, and 1.53 after medial unicompartmental replacement. After total ankle replacement a mean of 3.29 revisions per 100 observed component years was seen. The outcomes of total hip and knee replacement are almost identical. Revision rates of about 6% after five years and 12% after ten years are to be expected.