[Autoimmune Nodopathy].

Autoimmune nodopathy (AN), a newly established category of autoimmune disease, refers to an immune-mediated neuropathy associated with development of autoantibodies against membrane proteins, including neurofascin 186, neurofascin 155, contactin-1, and contactin-associated protein 1 located in the nodes of Ranvier or paranodes. Subclass analysis of these autoantibodies reveals predominant elevation of immunoglobulin (G4. Patients with AN show clinical and laboratory characteristics such as distal-predominant sensorimotor disturbance, sensory ataxia, poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin, and highly elevated cerebrospinal fluid protein levels. B cell-depletion therapy using an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody is effective for patients with AN. Autoantibody measurement is beneficial not only for diagnosis but also for deciding treatment strategies for AN.

[Autoimmune Autonomic Ganglionopathy and Acute Autonomic Sensory Neuropathy].

Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG) and acute autonomic sensory neuropathy (AASN) are immune-mediated neuropathies that affect the autonomic and/or dorsal root ganglia. Autoantibodies against the nicotinic ganglionic acetylcholine receptor (gAChR) detected in the sera of patients with AAG play a key role in the pathogenesis of this condition. Notably, gAChR antibodies are not detected in the sera of patients with AASN. Currently, AAG and AASN are not considered to be on the same spectrum with regard to disease concept based on clinical symptoms and laboratory findings. However, extra-autonomic brain symptoms (including psychiatric symptoms and personality changes) and endocrine disorders occur in both diseases, which suggests shared pathophysiology between the two conditions.

Autoimmune encephalitis in glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy.

Autoimmune encephalitis due to glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy is a rare cause of subacute neuropsychiatric changes. In this case, a young patient presented with a viral prodrome and meningismus, followed by progressive encephalopathy and movement disorders over the span of 2 weeks. Due to his clinical trajectory, inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, initial normal brain imaging and negative serum autoimmune encephalopathy panel, his initial diagnosis was presumed viral meningoencephalitis. The recurrence and progression of neuropsychiatric symptoms and myoclonus despite antiviral treatment prompted further investigation, inclusive of testing for CSF autoimmune encephalopathy autoantibodies, yielding a clinically meaningful, positive GFAP autoantibody. This case highlights the importance of appropriately testing both serum and CSF autoantibodies when an autoimmune encephalitic process is considered. Through this case, we review the clinical and radiographic manifestations of GFAP astrocytopathy, alongside notable pearls pertaining to this autoantibody syndrome and its management.

Study on clinical features and factors related to long-term outcomes of antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis.

OBJECTIVE: To delineate the clinical characteristics of antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and to investigate factors associated with long-term outcomes among antibody-negative AE. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with antibody-negative AE were recruited from January 2016 to December 2022 at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. The study assessed the long-term outcomes of antibody-negative AE using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE). Predictors influencing long-term outcomes were subsequently analyzed. External validation of RAPID scores (refractory status epilepticus [RSE], age of onset ≥60 years, ANPRA [antibody-negative probable autoimmune encephalitis], infratentorial involvement, and delay of immunotherapy ≥1 month) was performed. RESULTS: In total, 100 (47 females and 53 males) antibody-negative AE patients were enrolled in this study, with approximately 49 (49%) experiencing unfavorable long-term outcomes (mRS scores ≥3). Antibody-negative AE was subcategorized into ANPRA, autoimmune limbic encephalitis (LE), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). Psychiatric symptoms were prevalent in LE and ANPRA subtypes, while weakness and gait instability/dystonia were predominant in the ADEM subtype. Higher peak CASE scores (odds ratio [OR] 1.846, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.163-2.930, p = 0.009) and initiating immunotherapy within 30 days (OR 0.210, 95% CI: 0.046-0.948, p = 0.042) were correlated with long-term outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis returned that the RAPID scores cutoff of 1.5 best discriminated the group with poor long-term outcomes (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 56.9%). INTERPRETATION: The ANPRA subtype exhibited poorer long-term outcomes compared to LE and ADEM subtypes, and early immunotherapy was crucial for improving long-term outcomes in antibody-negative AE. The use of RAPID scoring could aid in guiding clinical decision making.

Autoimmune central nervous system disorders: Antibody testing and its clinical utility.

A rapidly expanding repertoire of neural antibody biomarkers exists for autoimmune central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Following clinical recognition of an autoimmune CNS disorder, the detection of a neural antibody facilitates diagnosis and informs prognosis and management. This review considers the phenotypes, diagnostic assay methodologies, and clinical utility of neural antibodies in autoimmune CNS disorders. Autoimmune CNS disorders may present with a diverse range of clinical features. Clinical phenotype should inform the neural antibodies selected for testing via the use of phenotype-specific panels. Both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are preferred in the vast majority of cases but for some analytes either CSF (e.g. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor [NMDA-R] IgG) or serum (e.g. aquaporin-4 [AQP4] IgG) specimens may be preferred. Screening using 2 methods is recommended for most analytes, particularly paraneoplastic antibodies. We utilize murine tissue-based indirect immunofluorescence assay (TIFA) with subsequent confirmatory protein-specific testing. The cellular location of the target antigen informs choice of confirmatory diagnostic assay (e.g. blot for intracellular antigens such as Hu; cell-based assay for cell surface targets such as leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 [LGI1]). Titers of positive results have limited diagnostic utility with the exception of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) 65 IgG autoimmunity, which is associated with neurological disease at higher values. While novel antibodies are typically discovered using established techniques such as TIFA and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry, more recent high-throughput molecular technologies (such as protein microarray and phage-display immunoprecipitation sequencing) may expedite the process of antibody discovery. Individual neural antibodies inform the clinician regarding the clinical associations, oncological risk stratification and tumor histology, the likely prognosis, and immunotherapy choice. In the era of neural antibody biomarkers for autoimmune CNS disorders, access to appropriate laboratory assays for neural antibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and management of these disorders.

The discrimination between autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy and tuberculous meningitis.

OBJECTIVE: The differential diagnosis between autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy (AGFAPA) mimicking tuberculous meningitis and tuberculous meningitis (TBM) remains challenging in clinical practice. This study aims to identify the clinical, laboratory parameters, and clinical score systems that may be helpful in differentiating AGFAPA from TBM. METHOD: Overall 22 AGFAPA patients who were initially misdiagnosed as TBM (AGFAPA-TBM) and 30 confirmed TBM patients were included. The clinical, laboratory, imaging parameters, Thwaites systems, and Lancet consensus scoring systems (LCSS) of all patients were reviewed. Logistic regression was employed to establish a diagnostic formula to differentiate AGFAPA-TBM from TBM. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to determine the best diagnostic critical point of the formula. RESULTS: Urinary retention was more frequent in AGFAPA-TBM patients (72.7% vs 33.3%, p = 0.012). A significantly lower ratio of T-SPOT. TB was noted in AGFAPA-TBM patients (9.1% vs 82.1%, p < 0.001). We found the LCSS was able to differentiate AGFAPA-TBM from TBM (AUC value 0.918, 95% CI=0.897-0.924). Furthermore, we set up a new scoring system with three variables: urinary retention, T-SPOT. TB, and cerebral imaging criteria in LCSS. The proposed diagnostic score ranges from -8 to 2, and a score of ≥ 0 was suggestive of AGFAPA-TBM (AUC value 0.938, 95% CI=0.878-0.951). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to evaluate the Thwaites system and LCSS in AGFAPA-TBM and TBM. We provide an alternative diagnostic formula to differentiate AGFAPA-TBM from TBM and suggest testing for GFAP antibodies to avoid misdiagnosis when this scoring system meets AGFAPA-TBM.

Seroprevalence of neuronal antibodies in diseases mimicking autoimmune encephalitis.

Detection of neuronal antibodies for autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes relies on commercially available cell-based assays and lineblots. However, lineblots may reveal the presence of neuronal antibodies in patients with various non-autoimmune etiologies. Herein we describe patients with non-autoimmune etiologies (cohort B) and detectable neuronal antibodies and compare them to definite cases of autoimmune encephalitis (cohort A) for differences in clinical data. All patients positive for at least one neuronal antibody were retrospectively evaluated for autoimmune encephalitis and/or paraneoplastic neurological syndrome between 2016 and 2022. 39 cases in cohort B and 23 in cohort A were identified. In cohort B, most common diagnoses were neurodegenerative disorders in 9/39 (23.1%), brain tumors in 6/39 (15.4%) while most common detected antibodies were anti-titin (N10), anti-recoverin (N11), anti-Yo (N8) and all were detected in serum only. Differential aspects between cohort A and B were CSF pleocytosis (14/23 (60.8%) vs 11/35 (31.4%), p = 0.042, respectively), MRI features suggestive of encephalitis (6/23 (26.1%) vs 0 (0%), p = 0.002, respectively) and epilepsy restricted to temporal lobes (14/23 (60.9%) vs 2/30 (6.7%), p = 0.0003, respectively). A large proportion of lineblot results were non-specific when only serum was tested and were frequently found in non-autoimmune neurological conditions.

Autoimmune and inflammatory neurological disorders in the intensive care unit.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review summarizes the diagnostic approach to autoimmune encephalitis (AE) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and provides practical guidance on therapeutic management. RECENT FINDINGS: Autoimmune encephalitis represents a group of immune-mediated brain diseases associated with antibodies that are pathogenic against central nervous system proteins. Recent findings suggests that the diagnosis of AE requires a multidisciplinary approach including appropriate recognition of common clinical syndromes, brain imaging and electroencephalography to confirm focal pathology, and cerebrospinal fluid and serum tests to rule out common brain infections, and to detect autoantibodies. ICU admission may be necessary at AE onset because of altered mental status, refractory seizures, and/or dysautonomia. Early management in ICU includes prompt initiation of immunotherapy, detection and treatment of seizures, and supportive care with neuromonitoring. In parallel, screening for neoplasm should be systematically performed. Despite severe presentation, epidemiological studies suggest that functional recovery is likely under appropriate therapy, even after prolonged ICU stays. CONCLUSION: AE and related disorders are increasingly recognized in the ICU population. Critical care physicians should be aware of these conditions and consider them early in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with unexplained encephalopathy. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory for diagnosis, ICU management, specific therapy, and prognostication.

Dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria: A clue to early diagnosis of Aicardi-Goutières syndrome.

A 6-year-old female with a history of Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS) presented to dermatology clinic with hypopigmented and hyperpigmented macules and patches consistent with dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria (DSH). Previous genetic workup demonstrated a de novo, heterozygous mutation in the adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR) gene. While the co-occurrence of AGS and DSH has previously been described in mutations of the ADAR gene, our case highlights the potential association between these disorders that may aid in earlier future diagnosis of AGS.

General features, pathogenesis, and laboratory diagnostics of autoimmune encephalitis.

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a group of inflammatory conditions that can associate with the presence of antibodies directed to neuronal intracellular, or cell surface antigens. These disorders are increasingly recognized as an important differential diagnosis of infectious encephalitis and of other common neuropsychiatric conditions. Autoantibody diagnostics plays a pivotal role for accurate diagnosis of AE, which is of utmost importance for the prompt recognition and early treatment. Several AE subgroups can be identified, either according to the prominent clinical phenotype, presence of a concomitant tumor, or type of neuronal autoantibody, and recent diagnostic criteria have provided important insights into AE classification. Antibodies to neuronal intracellular antigens typically associate with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and poor prognosis, whereas antibodies to synaptic/neuronal cell surface antigens characterize many AE subtypes that associate with tumors less frequently, and that are often immunotherapy-responsive. In addition to the general features of AE, we review current knowledge on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying these disorders, focusing mainly on the potential role of neuronal antibodies in the most frequent conditions, and highlight current theories and controversies. Then, we dissect the crucial aspects of the laboratory diagnostics of neuronal antibodies, which represents an actual challenge for both pathologists and neurologists. Indeed, this diagnostics entails technical difficulties, along with particularly interesting novel features and pitfalls. The novelties especially apply to the wide range of assays used, including specific tissue-based and cell-based assays. These assays can be developed in-house, usually in specialized laboratories, or are commercially available. They are widely used in clinical immunology and in clinical chemistry laboratories, with relevant differences in analytic performance. Indeed, several data indicate that in-house assays could perform better than commercial kits, notwithstanding that the former are based on non-standardized protocols. Moreover, they need expertise and laboratory facilities usually unavailable in clinical chemistry laboratories. Together with the data of the literature, we critically evaluate the analytical performance of the in-house vs commercial kit-based approach. Finally, we propose an algorithm aimed at integrating the present strategies of the laboratory diagnostics in AE for the best clinical management of patients with these disorders.

SAMHD1 compound heterozygous rare variants associated with moyamoya and mitral valve disease in the absence of other features of Aicardi-Goutières syndrome.

Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS) is an autosomal recessive inflammatory syndrome that manifests as an early-onset encephalopathy with both neurologic and extraneurologic clinical findings. AGS has been associated with pathogenic variants in nine genes: TREX1, RNASEH2B, RNASEH2C, RNASEH2A, SAMHD1, ADAR, IFIH1, LSM11, and RNU7-1. Diagnosis is established by clinical findings (encephalopathy and acquired microcephaly, intellectual and physical impairments, dystonia, hepatosplenomegaly, sterile pyrexia, and/or chilblains), characteristic abnormalities on cranial CT (calcification of the basal ganglia and white matter) and MRI (leukodystrophic changes), or the identification of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in the known genes. One of the genes associated with AGS, SAMHD1, has also been associated with a spectrum of cerebrovascular diseases, including moyamoya disease (MMD). In this report, we describe a 31-year-old male referred to genetics for MMD since childhood who lacked the hallmark features of AGS patients but was found to have compound heterozygous SAMHD1 variants. He later developed mitral valve insufficiency due to recurrent chordal rupture and ultimately underwent a heart transplant at 37 years of age. Thus, these data suggest that SAMHD1 pathogenic variants can cause MMD without typical AGS symptoms and support that SAMHD1 should be assessed in MMD patients even in the absence of AGS features.

Looking Beyond Syndrome-Based Criteria for Autoimmune Encephalitis-The Need for Complementary Neural Antibody-Based Diagnostic Criteria.

This Viewpoint discusses how neural antibody­based diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis would complement the syndrome-based diagnostic algorithm to improve sensitivity while maintaining high specificity.

Autonomic nervous system involvement in autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes.

In autoimmune neurological diseases, the autonomic nervous system can be the primary target of autoimmunity (e.g. autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy), or, more frequently, be damaged together with other areas of the nervous system (e.g. Guillain-Barré syndrome). Patients with autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) often develop dysautonomia; however, the frequency and spectrum of autonomic signs and symptoms remain ill defined except for those scenarios in which dysautonomia is a core feature of the disease. Such is the case of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, Morvan syndrome or anti-NMDAR encephalitis; in the latter, patients with dysautonomia have been reported to carry a more severe disease and to retain higher disability than those without autonomic dysfunction. Likewise, the presence of autonomic involvement indicates a higher risk of death due to neurological cause in patients with anti-Hu PNS. However, in anti-Hu and other PNS, as well as in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitors' toxicities, the characterization of autonomic involvement is frequently overshadowed by the severity of other neurological symptoms and signs. When evaluated with tests specific for autonomic function, patients with autoimmune encephalitis or PNS usually show a more widespread autonomic involvement than clinically suggested, which may reflect a potential gap of care when it comes to diagnosing dysautonomia. This review aims to revise the autonomic involvement in patients with autoimmune encephalitis and PNS, using for that purpose an antibody-based approach. We also discuss and provide general recommendations for the evaluation and management of dysautonomia in these patients.

Antibody-Negative Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) refers to a heterogenous group of inflammatory CNS diseases. Subgroups with specified neural autoantibodies are more homogeneous in presentation, trigger factors, outcome, and response to therapy. However, a considerable fraction of patients has AE features but does not harbor detectable autoantibodies and is referred to as antibody-negative AE. Our aim was to describe clinical features, trigger factors, treatments, and outcome of a cohort of comprehensively tested antibody-negative AE patients. METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study recruited adult patients whose serum and/or CSF was sent to our tertiary center for neural antibody testing between 2011 and 2020, who entered the diagnostic algorithm as possible antibody-negative AE and had the following: (1) probable antibody-negative AE, definite antibody-negative acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), or definite autoimmune limbic encephalitis (LE) according to diagnostic criteria; (2) available data on MRI of the brain, CSF, and EEG; and (3) stored serum and/or CSF samples. These samples were reanalyzed using a comprehensive combination of cell-based and tissue-based assays. RESULTS: Of 2,250 patients tested, 33 (1.5%) were classified as possible antibody-negative AE. Of these, 5 were found to have antibodies by comprehensive testing, 5 fulfilled the criteria of probable AE (3F:2M, median age 67, range 42-67), 4 of definite autoimmune LE (2F:2M, median age 45.5, range 27-60 years), one of definite antibody-negative ADEM, 2 of Hashimoto encephalopathy, one had no samples available for additional testing, and 15 had no further categorization. Of 10 probable/definite AE/LE/ADEM, one had a malignancy and none of them received an alternative diagnosis until the end of follow-up (median 18 months). In total, 80% (8/10) of patients received immunotherapy including corticosteroids, and 6/10 (60%) patients received rituximab, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, or IV immunoglobulins. Five (50%) patients improved, one (10%) stabilized, one (10%) worsened, and 3 (30%) died. All deaths were considered to be related to encephalitis. We did not observe differences of immunotherapy-treated patients in likelihood of improvement with or without nonsteroidal immunotherapy (with 2/6, without 1/2). DISCUSSION: Antibody-negative AE should be diagnosed only after comprehensive testing. Diagnostic effort is important because many patients benefit from immunotherapy and some have malignancies.

Validation of different predictive scoring scales in patients with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy related to neuronal surface antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the different predictive scoring scales in the Chinese population with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy of unknown etiology related to neuronal surface antibody (Ab)-mediated autoimmune encephalitis (AE). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 174 consecutive patients from October 2018 to December 2022, whose serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples were tested for neuronal surface Abs. The antibody prevalence in epilepsy and encephalopathy (APE2), antibodies contributing to focal epilepsy signs and symptoms (ACES), "obvious" indications for neural antibody testing in epilepsy or seizures (ONES) checklist, and the combinations were used to validate the predictive models of neuronal surface Ab-mediated AE. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy of unknown etiology were enrolled. Abs were detected in 37 patients (26.6%). The APE2/ONES reflex score had the highest sensitivity (89.2%) and lowest specificity (41.7%). The ACES score had the lowest sensitivity (67.5%) and highest specificity (64.7%). Variations in the performance were observed in the different types of AE. 100% of patients with anti-γ-aminobutyric acid B-B receptor encephalitis were predicted by ONES, APE2/ONES reflex, and ACES/ONES reflex scores. Only 75% of patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis were predicted by the APE2/ONES and ACES/ONES reflex scores. CONCLUSION: Our study was the first to validate various predictive scoring scales in the Chinese cohort of patients with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy of unknown etiology related to neuronal surface Ab-mediated AE. Based upon clinical suspicion, more than one scoring scale should be performed to predict the chance of AE in those patients.