Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 208
Filter
1.
J Appl Lab Med ; 9(3): 477-492, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38391346

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sigma metrics have been adapted for the clinical laboratory to incorporate observed accuracy, precision, and total error allowed. The higher the Sigma level for a process, the better performance that process has. A limitation of studies assessing Sigma metrics is that they are performed on a small number of well-controlled systems. METHODS: An algorithm was developed to extract QC data and derive the Sigma metric for 115 analytes from sites connected to the QuidelOrtho E-Connectivity® database. The median of these results was then used to derive the Sigma metric for each assay. RESULTS: In this analysis, 79 out of 115 (68.7%) of the assays assessed achieved 6 Sigma or better and 98 out of 115 (85.2%) achieved 5 Sigma or better. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated a methodology that can be used to condense Sigma metrics from hundreds of analyzers into a single metric of assay quality. Because these analyzers are running in working laboratories from around the world, this analysis can serve as a baseline for understanding the assay performance achieved in the presence of variabilities such as lab-to-lab, instrument-to-instrument, material handling, environmental conditions, and reagent lot. The significant number of assays demonstrating high Sigma levels did so despite this variation. The ability of the methods reported here to include hundreds of analyzers represents a novel approach for assessing Sigma metrics in clinical laboratories.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Humans , Laboratories, Clinical/standards , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Total Quality Management , Sigma Factor , Quality Control , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/instrumentation
2.
Indian J Pathol Microbiol ; 65(1): 105-110, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35074973

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Optimal DNA and RNA quantity and purity is essential for downstream molecular biology experimentation and to avoid re-processing of sample. Despite availability of different kits and automated systems for nucleic acid isolation there is limited data on their performance evaluation, more so with pediatric blood samples, that are usually compromised in quantity. Hence, we evaluated the performance of automated QIAcube platform using pediatric blood samples in parallel with manual Qiagen extraction kits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: : A total of 500 samples were analyzed based on groups of PBMC and direct blood input. The isolated DNA and RNA were surveyed for quantity and quality tests by spectrophotometric and downstream analysis. RESULTS: : There was no significant difference in the DNA quantity (ng/ul) between manual and automated method based on similar sample input but quality (260/280) was significantly better with the QIAcube platform when direct blood and or PBMCs were used for extraction respectively (1.82 ± 004 Vs. 1.84.002; P-0.000008 and 1.859 ± 005 Vs. 1.843 ± 0.003; P-0.02). Moreover, the standard error mean was low for both quantity and quality in the QIAcube method suggesting uniformity. Comparison of quality assessment by spectrophotometer and qubit fluorimeter showed that QIAcube sheared DNA less (P- 0.038) as compared to manual method (P-0.013). Also, time taken to process the samples in QIAcube was 23% less than the kit-based method. CONCLUSION: Overall analysis of QIAcube platform suggests that it yields more better, uniform, and less-sheared quality of nucleic acid in a relatively less time as compared to manual extraction kits.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/standards , Blood Cells , DNA/isolation & purification , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , Molecular Biology/methods , RNA/isolation & purification , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Automation, Laboratory/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , DNA/standards , Humans , Infant , Molecular Biology/instrumentation , Molecular Biology/standards , RNA/standards
3.
Breast Dis ; 41(1): 55-65, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34397396

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ki-67 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining is a widely used cancer proliferation assay; however, its limitations could be improved with automated scoring. The OncotypeDXTM Recurrence Score (ORS), which primarily evaluates cancer proliferation genes, is a prognostic indicator for breast cancer chemotherapy response; however, it is more expensive and slower than Ki-67. OBJECTIVE: To compare manual Ki-67 (mKi-67) with automated Ki-67 (aKi-67) algorithm results based on manually selected Ki-67 "hot spots" in breast cancer, and correlate both with ORS. METHODS: 105 invasive breast carcinoma cases from 100 patients at our institution (2011-2013) with available ORS were evaluated. Concordance was assessed via Cohen's Kappa (κ). RESULTS: 57/105 cases showed agreement between mKi-67 and aKi-67 (κ 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.45), with 41 cases overestimated by aKi-67. Concordance was higher when estimated on the same image (κ 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.69). Concordance between mKi-67 score and ORS was fair (κ 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.42), and concordance between aKi-67 and ORS was poor (κ 0.10, 95% CI -0.03-0.23). CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the limits of Ki-67 algorithms that use manual "hot spot" selection. Due to suboptimal concordance, Ki-67 is likely most useful as a complement to, rather than a surrogate for ORS, regardless of scoring method.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/statistics & numerical data , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Breast Neoplasms/secondary , Immunohistochemistry/statistics & numerical data , Immunohistochemistry/standards , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Middle Aged , Prognosis
4.
Genes (Basel) ; 12(11)2021 11 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34828415

ABSTRACT

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is the basis for almost all sequence comparison and molecular phylogenetic inferences. Large-scale genomic analyses are typically associated with automated progressive MSA without subsequent manual adjustment, which itself is often error-prone because of the lack of a consistent and explicit criterion. Here, I outlined several commonly encountered alignment errors that cannot be avoided by progressive MSA for nucleotide, amino acid, and codon sequences. Methods that could be automated to fix such alignment errors were then presented. I emphasized the utility of position weight matrix as a new tool for MSA refinement and illustrated its usage by refining the MSA of nucleotide and amino acid sequences. The main advantages of the position weight matrix approach include (1) its use of information from all sequences, in contrast to other commonly used methods based on pairwise alignment scores and inconsistency measures, and (2) its speedy computation, making it suitable for a large number of long viral genomic sequences.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/methods , Genomics/methods , Sequence Alignment/methods , Algorithms , Animals , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Genomics/standards , Humans , Phylogeny , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sequence Alignment/standards , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNA/standards , Sequence Analysis, Protein/methods , Sequence Analysis, Protein/standards
5.
Viruses ; 13(8)2021 08 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34452483

ABSTRACT

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations represent a significant morbidity and mortality problem in transplant patients. Reliable and rapid measurement of CMV viral load is a key issue for optimal patient management. We report here the evaluation of NeuMoDx™ (Qiagen) in a routine hospital setting (University Hospitals of Marseille, France) in comparison with our classical reference technique R-GENE. During one month, 719 CMV viral loads from 507 patients were measured in parallel in both techniques. Using the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve and our biological experience we suggest that values <52 IU/mL (geometric mean) correspond to negative samples, values >140 IU/mL (Fowlkes-Mallows index) correspond to quantifiable positive results and values ranging from 52 to 140 IU/mL represent non-quantifiable positive results. Follow-up of 15 transplant patients who developed CMV reactivation during the study showed that NeuMoDx™ provided higher viral load measurement during the first two weeks of follow-up for three patients. These important intra-individual variations resulted in a significant median increase considering the whole data set (6.7 points of difference expressed as a percentage of the initial viral load). However, no difference between the two techniques was noticeable after two weeks of treatment. Subsequent to this first study we conclude that NeuMoDx™, used with optimized logistics and an adapted threshold, allows a rapid CMV viral load measurement and that its use does not lead to any difference in patient management compared to the reference technique R-GENE®.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/standards , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Cytomegalovirus/genetics , DNA, Viral/genetics , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data , Viral Load/instrumentation , Automation, Laboratory/instrumentation , Automation, Laboratory/methods , Cytomegalovirus/isolation & purification , Cytomegalovirus Infections/blood , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Feedback , France , Humans , Laboratories, Clinical , Latent Infection/virology , Prospective Studies , Viral Load/methods , Viral Load/statistics & numerical data
6.
EBioMedicine ; 69: 103465, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34229274

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has overwhelmed health systems worldwide and highlighted limitations of diagnostic testing. Several types of diagnostic tests including RT-PCR-based assays and antigen detection by lateral flow assays, each with their own strengths and weaknesses, have been developed and deployed in a short time. METHODS: Here, we describe an immunoaffinity purification approach followed a by high resolution mass spectrometry-based targeted qualitative assay capable of detecting SARS-CoV-2 viral antigen from nasopharyngeal swab samples. Based on our discovery experiments using purified virus, recombinant viral protein and nasopharyngeal swab samples from COVID-19 positive patients, nucleocapsid protein was selected as a target antigen. We then developed an automated antibody capture-based workflow coupled to targeted high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) - parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) assay on an Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer. An ensemble machine learning-based model for determining COVID-19 positive samples was developed using fragment ion intensities from the PRM data. FINDINGS: The optimized targeted assay, which was used to analyze 88 positive and 88 negative nasopharyngeal swab samples for validation, resulted in 98% (95% CI = 0.922-0.997) (86/88) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI = 0.958-1.000) (88/88) specificity using RT-PCR-based molecular testing as the reference method. INTERPRETATION: Our results demonstrate that direct detection of infectious agents from clinical samples by tandem mass spectrometry-based assays have potential to be deployed as diagnostic assays in clinical laboratories, which has hitherto been limited to analysis of pure microbial cultures. FUNDING: This study was supported by DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance Margdarshi Fellowship grant IA/M/15/1/502023 awarded to AP and the generosity of Eric and Wendy Schmidt.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , Immunoassay/methods , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Animals , Antigens, Viral/chemistry , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Automation, Laboratory/methods , Automation, Laboratory/standards , COVID-19 Serological Testing/standards , Chlorocebus aethiops , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/chemistry , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/immunology , Humans , Immunoassay/standards , Machine Learning , Mass Spectrometry/standards , Phosphoproteins/chemistry , Phosphoproteins/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
Diagn Cytopathol ; 49(4): 559-574, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33548162

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer progresses slowly, increasing the chance of early detection of pre-neoplastic lesions via Pap exam test and subsequently preventing deaths. However, the exam presents both false-negatives and false-positives results. Therefore, automatic methods (AMs) of reading the Pap test have been used to improve the quality control of the exam. We performed a literature review to evaluate the feasibility of implementing AMs in laboratories. METHODS: This work reviewed scientific publications regarding automated cytology from the last 15 years. The terms used were "Papanicolaou test" and "Automated cytology screening" in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, in the three scientific databases (SCIELO, PUBMED, MEDLINE). RESULTS: Of the resulting 787 articles, 34 were selected for a complete review, including three AMs: ThinPrep Imaging System, FocalPoint GS Imaging System and CytoProcessor. In total, 1 317 148 cytopathological slides were evaluated automatically, with 1 308 028 (99.3%) liquid-based cytology slides and 9120 (0.7%) conventional cytology smears. The AM diagnostic performances were statistically equal to or better than those of the manual method. AM use increased the detection of cellular abnormalities and reduced false-negatives. The average sample rejection rate was ≤3.5%. CONCLUSION: AMs are relevant in quality control during the analytical phase of cervical cancer screening. This technology eliminates slide-handling steps and reduces the sample space, allowing professionals to focus on diagnostic interpretation while maintaining high-level care, which can reduce false-negatives. Further studies with conventional cytology are needed. The use of AM is still not so widespread in cytopathology laboratories.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/methods , Papanicolaou Test/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Female , Humans , Papanicolaou Test/standards
8.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246302, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33591986

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two automatable in-house protocols for high-troughput RNA extraction from nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection have been evaluated. METHODS: One hundred forty one SARS-CoV-2 positive samples were collected during a period of 10-days. In-house protocols were based on extraction with magnetic beads and designed to be used with either the Opentrons OT-2 (OT-2in-house) liquid handling robot or the MagMAXTM Express-96 system (MMin-house). Both protocols were tested in parallel with a commercial kit that uses the MagMAXTM system (MMkit). Nucleic acid extraction efficiencies were calculated from a SARS-CoV-2 DNA positive control. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between both in-house protocols and the commercial kit in their performance to detect positive samples. The MMkit was the most efficient although the MMin-house presented, in average, lower Cts than the other two. In-house protocols allowed to save between 350€ and 400€ for every 96 extracted samples compared to the commercial kit. CONCLUSION: The protocols described harness the use of easily available reagents and an open-source liquid handling system and are suitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection in high throughput facilities.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/methods , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , RNA, Viral/standards , Automation, Laboratory/economics , Automation, Laboratory/standards , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/economics , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/standards , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans , RNA, Viral/chemistry , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/economics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
9.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(3)2021 Jan 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33498248

ABSTRACT

Hereditary factor XIII (FXIII) deficiency is a rare autosomal bleeding disorder which can cause life-threatening bleeding. Acquired deficiency can be immune-mediated or due to increased consumption or reduced synthesis. The most commonly used screening test is insensitive, and widely used quantitative assays have analytical limitations. The present study sought to validate Technofluor FXIII Activity, the first isopeptidase-based assay available on a routine coagulation analyser, the Ceveron s100. Linearity was evidenced throughout the measuring range, with correlation coefficients of >0.99, and coefficients of variation for repeatability and reproducibility were <5% and <10%, respectively. A normally distributed reference range of 47.0-135.5 IU/dL was derived from 154 normal donors. Clinical samples with Technofluor FXIII Activity results between 0 and 167.0 IU/dL were assayed with Berichrom® FXIII Activity, a functional ammonia release assay, and the HemosIL™ FXIII antigen assay, generating correlations of 0.950 and 0.980, respectively. Experiments with a transglutaminase inhibitor showed that Technofluor FXIII Activity can detect inhibition of enzymatic activity. No interference was exhibited by high levels of haemolysis and lipaemia, and interference by bilirubin was evident at 18 mg/dL, a level commensurate with severe liver disease. Technofluor FXIII Activity is a rapid, accurate and precise assay suitable for routine diagnostic use with fewer interferents than ammonia release FXIII activity assays.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/methods , Blood Coagulation Tests/methods , Carbon-Nitrogen Lyases/metabolism , Factor XIII Deficiency/diagnosis , Factor XIII/analysis , Fluorescent Dyes/standards , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Bilirubin/metabolism , Blood Coagulation Tests/standards , Chromogenic Compounds/standards , Factor XIII/metabolism , Factor XIII Deficiency/blood , Fluorometry/methods , Fluorometry/standards , Hemolysis , Humans , Immunologic Tests/methods , Immunologic Tests/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Transglutaminases/metabolism
10.
Diagn Cytopathol ; 49(4): 509-517, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33444463

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) was proposed to provide a standardized reporting system for salivary gland fine needle aspiration biopsies. Modified Menghini type semi-automatic aspiration biopsy needles provide small tissue fragments (STFs), as well as cellular smears, and immunohistochemical and molecular studies can be performed using the STFs. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the contribution of STFs and ancillary techniques to pre-operative diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, smears of 287 cases with histopathological correlation were re-reviewed and assigned to one of the MSRSGC categories. In the second step, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings in STFs were evaluated together with cytological findings. Final diagnoses were obtained with the inclusion of flow cytometry (FC) results when available. Risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for each diagnostic category. RESULTS: In the evaluation based on smears, a specific diagnosis could be obtained in 64.8% of the cases. ROMs were 0% for nondiagnostic (ND), 5.6% for non-neoplastic (NN), 55% for atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 0.6% for benign neoplasm (BN), 27.8% for salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP), and 100% for suspicious for malignancy (SFM) and malignant (M) categories. With the addition of histopathological and immunohistochemical findings and FC results, a specific diagnosis could be obtained in 75.2% of the cases. ROMs were 0% for ND, 4.5% for NN, 53.8% for AUS, 0.6% for BN, 0% for SUMP, and 100% for SFM/M categories. CONCLUSIONS: STFs contribute correct categorization of salivary gland lesions. The major contribution of ancillary methods is in the SUMP category.


Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry/methods , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Automation, Laboratory/methods , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/methods , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/standards , Child , Female , Flow Cytometry/standards , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Period , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/classification , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/surgery
11.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 35(1): e23586, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32969530

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Automated flow cytometry-based urine analyzer is increasingly being used to identify and enumerate cells and particles in urine specimens. It measures electrical conductivity which could be transformed to osmolality. Using this machine, all urine specimens could be screened for osmolality without requiring a separate dedicated device. We evaluated the performance of the new instrument, the UF-5000 (Sysmex Corporation), in the measurement of urine osmolality. METHODS: The precision of urine osmolality measurement by the UF-5000 was evaluated for 20 days and 4 times a day for 2 concentrations. The linearity and detection capability were evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. For comparison, 270 random urine specimens from patients were tested simultaneously using the UF5000 and the OsmoPro micro-osmometer (Advanced instruments). RESULTS: The laboratory-based coefficient variations were less than 5%. Urine osmolality using the UF-5000 has a verified linear range (y = 1.097x + 16.91, R2  = .997). Within the comparison analysis, the mean difference was not large (-7.72%) but each differences were largely dispersed with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) from -70.5 to 55.06%, and the mean absolute difference -28.3 mOsm/kg with 95% LoA from -295.13 to 238.45 mOsm/kg. Cohen's kappa value was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.45-0.63). CONCLUSIONS: The UF-5000 measured conductivity and generated an acceptable quantitative analysis of urine osmolality. When compared with the results of the freezing point depression method used by the OsmoPro, a percentage of the measured urine osmolality by the UF-5000 was outside the allowable limit.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory , Flow Cytometry , Urinalysis , Automation, Laboratory/methods , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Electric Conductivity , Flow Cytometry/methods , Flow Cytometry/standards , Humans , Osmolar Concentration , Urinalysis/methods , Urinalysis/standards , Urine/chemistry , Urine/cytology
12.
Lab Med ; 52(2): e30-e38, 2021 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33009810

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Examination of urine sediment is crucial in acute kidney injury (AKI). In such renal injury, tubular epithelial cells, epithelial cell casts, and dysmorphic red cells may provide clues to etiology. The aim of this study was to compare automated urinalysis findings with manual microscopic analysis in AKI. METHODS: Samples from patients diagnosed with AKI and control patients were included in the study. Red blood cells, white blood cells, renal tubular epithelial cells/small round cells, casts, and pathologic (path) cast counts obtained microscopically and by a UF1000i cytometer were compared by Spearman test. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the ability to predict AKI from parameters obtained from the UF1000i. RESULTS: There was poor correlation between manual and automated analysis in AKI. None of the parameters could predict AKI using logistic regression analysis. However, the increment in the automated path cast count increased the odds of AKI 93 times. CONCLUSION: Automated urinalysis parameters are poor predictors of AKI, and there is no agreement with manual microscopy.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Microscopy , Urinalysis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Automation, Laboratory/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Microscopy/standards , Microscopy/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Urinalysis/standards , Urinalysis/statistics & numerical data , Urine/chemistry , Urine/cytology , Young Adult
13.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2237: 11-38, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33237405

ABSTRACT

Multiplex immunoassays are important tools in basic research and diagnostics. The ability to accurately quantify the presence of several antigens within an individual sample all at once has been useful in developing a proteomics view of biology. This in turn has enabled the development of disease-associated immunodiagnostic panels for better prognosis and well-being. Moreover, it is well understood that such multiplexing approaches lend themselves to automation, thereby reducing labor while providing the ability to dramatically conserve both reagent and sample all of which will reduce the cost per test. Here we describe various methods to create and use multiplex immunoassays in the wells of microtiter plates or similar formats.


Subject(s)
Immunologic Tests/methods , Protein Array Analysis/methods , Animals , Automation, Laboratory/methods , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques/methods , Immunoenzyme Techniques/standards , Immunologic Tests/economics , Immunologic Tests/standards , Protein Array Analysis/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
14.
SLAS Discov ; 26(3): 410-419, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32935608

ABSTRACT

We previously developed a panel of one-step real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (one-step qRT-PCR; hereafter referred to as qRT-PCR) assays to assess compound efficacy. However, these high-cost, conventional qRT-PCR manual assays are not amenable to high-throughput screen (HTS) analysis in a time-sensitive and complex drug discovery process. Here, we report the establishment of an automated gene expression platform using in-house lysis conditions that allows the study of various cell lines, including primary T cells. This process innovation provides the opportunity to perform genotypic profiling in both immunology and oncology therapeutic areas with quantitative studies as part of routine drug discovery program support. This newly instituted platform also enables a panel screening strategy to efficiently connect HTS, lead identification, and lead optimization in parallel.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/standards , Gene Expression Profiling/standards , High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Antigens, Neoplasm/genetics , Antigens, Neoplasm/immunology , Automation, Laboratory/instrumentation , Baculoviral IAP Repeat-Containing 3 Protein/genetics , Baculoviral IAP Repeat-Containing 3 Protein/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , Chemokine CCL3/genetics , Chemokine CCL3/immunology , Drug Discovery/methods , Gene Expression Profiling/instrumentation , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gene Expression Regulation , HCT116 Cells , High-Throughput Screening Assays/instrumentation , Humans , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/immunology , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Neoplasm Proteins/immunology , Osteoblasts/cytology , Osteoblasts/metabolism , Primary Cell Culture , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Ribosomal Proteins/genetics , Ribosomal Proteins/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/cytology , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism
15.
PLoS One ; 15(10): e0239931, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33002049

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anemia is one of the most impactful nutrient deficiencies in the world and disproportionately affects children in low-resource settings. Point-of-care devices (PoCDs) measuring blood hemoglobin (Hb) are widely used in such settings to screen for anemia due to their low cost, speed, and convenience. Here we present the first iteration of Aptus, a new PoCD which measures Hb and hematocrit (HCT). AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of Aptus and HemoCue® Hb 301 against an automated hematology analyzer (Medonic®) in Gambian children aged 6-35 months and the Aptus' usage in the field. METHODS: Aptus, HemoCue® and Medonic® were compared using venous blood (n = 180), and Aptus and HemoCue® additionally using capillary blood (n = 506). Agreement was estimated using Bland-Altman analysis and Lin's concordance. Usage was assessed by error occurrence and user experience. RESULTS: Mean Hb values in venous blood did not significantly differ between Aptus and HemoCue® (10.44±1.05 vs 10.56±0.93g/dl, p>0.05), but both measured higher Hb concentrations than Medonic® (9.75±0.99g/dl, p<0.0001). Lin's coefficient between Aptus and Medonic® was rc = 0.548, between HemoCue® and Medonic® rc = 0.636. Mean bias between the PoCDs venous measurements was -0.11g/dl with limits of agreement (LoA) -1.63 and 1.40g/dl. The bias was larger for the comparisons between the Medonic® and both Aptus (0.69g/dl, LoA 0.92 and 2.31g/dl) and HemoCue® (0.81g/dl, LoA 0.17 and 1.78g/dl). ROC curves showed an AUC of 0.933 in HemoCue® and 0.799 in Aptus. Capillary Hb was higher with Aptus than HemoCue® (10.33±1.11g/dl vs 10.01±1.07g/dl, p<0.0001). Mean bias was 0.32g/dl with LoA of -1.91 and 2.54g/dl. Aptus' usage proved intuitive, yet time-to-results and cuvettes could be improved. CONCLUSION: Both PoCDs showed a relatively limited bias but large LoA. Aptus and HemoCue® showed similar accuracy, while both overestimated Hb levels. Aptus showed promise, with its operation unimpaired by field conditions as well as being able to show HCT values.


Subject(s)
Anemia/blood , Point-of-Care Testing/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Anemia/diagnosis , Automation, Laboratory/instrumentation , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Female , Gambia , Hemoglobinometry/instrumentation , Hemoglobinometry/standards , Humans , Male , Rural Population , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 78(5): 565-573, 2020 10 01.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026351

ABSTRACT

The interpretation of the variation between the results of two dosages performed on the same patient is generally quite empirical. It is usually based on the experience of the biologist or physician. Through two examples, total PSA and hemoglobin, we hoped to set up an indicator of the significance variation between results: The Reference change value or RCV to provide assistance to the validator biologist and prescriber based on measured statistical arguments. This article describes the methodology used for the RCV calculation, the formatting on analysis reports and the limitations of the system.


Subject(s)
Biological Variation, Individual , Clinical Laboratory Services/standards , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Hemoglobins/analysis , Prostate-Specific Antigen/analysis , Automation, Laboratory/instrumentation , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/instrumentation , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Female , Humans , Laboratory Proficiency Testing , Male , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Observer Variation , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Reference Standards , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
17.
Genes (Basel) ; 11(10)2020 10 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33053675

ABSTRACT

WHO declared the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak a global pandemic on 11 March 2020. The establishment of standardized RT-qPCR protocols for respiratory secretions testing, as well as sharing of specimens, data, and information became critical. Here, we investigate the analytical performance of two interim RT-qPCR protocols (Charité and Centers for Disease Control (CDC)) for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 executed in a fully automated platform. Analytical specificity, PCR amplification efficiency, analytical sensitivity (limit of detection), and cross-reactivity were evaluated using contrived samples. The on-going accuracy was evaluated by retrospective analysis of our test results database (real clinical samples). N1, E, and a modified version of RdRP assays presented adequate analytical specificity, amplification efficiency, and analytical sensitivity using contrived samples. The three assays were applied to all individuals who requested the SARS-CoV-2 molecular test assay in our laboratory and it was observed that N1 gave more positive results than E, and E gave more positive results than RdRP (modified). The RdRP and E were removed from the test and its final version, based on N1 assay only, was applied to 30,699 Brazilian individuals (from 19 February 2020 to 8 May 2020). The aggregated test results available in the database were also presented.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/standards , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Automation, Laboratory/methods , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19 Vaccines , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Limit of Detection , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods
18.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest ; 80(5): 427-432, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32478619

ABSTRACT

In the context of point of care testing (PoCT) and ISO 22870, internal quality control (IQC) is a crucial part of PoCT accreditation processes. Quality Control materials shall be periodically examined with a frequency that is based on the robustness of the analytical procedure and the risk of harm to the patient from an erroneous result. We propose to apply the statistical quality control (SQC) procedure to develop an individualized QC plan for AQT90 flex instrument used in PoCT. The robustness is determined by the sigma-metric and analytical goal represented by an allowable total error (TEa) is evaluated using a Varela graphic tool. A Sigma-metric SQC run size nomogram for estimating the number of patient samples between IQC events. According to the calculated robustness we can distinguish 3 groups of parameters: HCG and CRP with large sample size per event, D-Dimer and Procalcitonin with an average sample size per event and Myoglobin. NT-proBNP. and Troponin T with a limited sample size per event. In PoCT, the SQC strategy can promote more effective, and not necessarily more frequent, IQC.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/standards , Point-of-Care Testing/standards , Radioimmunoassay/standards , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Chorionic Gonadotropin/blood , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Humans , Myoglobin/blood , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Peptide Fragments/blood , Procalcitonin/blood , Quality Control , Troponin T/blood
19.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest ; 80(5): 433-440, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459511

ABSTRACT

D-dimer testing combined with a clinical assessment has become a standard pathway for ruling-out venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recently, novel Point-of-Care (POC) D-dimer assays have been introduced, enabling low-volume blood sampling for rapid exclusion of VTE in a one-step procedure. We assessed the analytical validity and user-friendliness of a set of these novel POC D-dimer assays, and compared the results with a standard laboratory assay. Plasma samples were run on our reference assay (STA-Liatest D-di PLUS®) and five POC assays: Nano-Checker 710®, AFIAS-1®; iChroma-II®; Standard F200® and Hipro AFS/1®). After evaluating imprecision, Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients were calculated, Passing Bablok regression was performed and Bland-Altman plots were generated. User-friendliness was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS). A set of 238 plasma samples of patients clinically suspected of VTE in general practice was available for analysis. Only one POC D-dimer assay (Nano-Checker 710) demonstrated an insufficient degree of imprecision. Pearson correlation coefficients and mean biases ranged from 0.68 to 0.93 and -165 to -53 µg/L respectively, and concordance with our reference assay varied from 71.8% to 89.5% using a 500 µg/L cut-off point. While we found considerable variation in overall user-friendliness, most devices were judged easy to use. In view of our findings regarding analytical performance and user-friendliness, we consider most of the novel POC D-dimer assays can be used in settings outside of the laboratory such as general practice, combining the possibility of multi-testing with low-volume capillary blood sampling and processing times of less than 15 min.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/standards , Biological Assay/standards , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Point-of-Care Testing/standards , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Benchmarking , Humans , Pulmonary Embolism/blood , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Quality Control , Time Factors , Venous Thromboembolism/blood , Venous Thrombosis/blood , Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis
20.
Ann Clin Lab Sci ; 50(2): 282-286, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32366571

ABSTRACT

The performance of the automated indirect immunofluorescence system was compared with the manual method for detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) from 354 clinical serum samples. We compared the results (negative or positive), ANA patterns, and titers for the two methods. The coincidence rates for ANA positive and negative samples were 93.4% and 98.7%, respectively. The coincidence rates for single patterns, mixed patterns, and the final titers were 85.1%, 87.6%, and 87.6%, respectively. The homogeneous, speckled, cytoplasmic, centromere, multiple nuclear dots, and nucleolar pattern coincidence rates were 79.3%, 83.0%, 87.8%, 72.7%, 50%, and 56.3%, respectively. The automated indirect immunofluorescence system had acceptable accuracy for detection of ANA.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Autoantibodies/blood , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/methods , Antibodies, Antinuclear/immunology , Autoantibodies/immunology , Autoimmune Diseases/blood , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...