Reduced expression of miRNAs as potential biomarkers in axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the value of miR-29a-3p, miR-27a, miR126-3p, miR-146a-5p, miR-625-3p, miR-130a, miR-32, miR-218, miR-131, and miR5196 in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis and to determine whether there is a difference in miRNA expression levels between radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, as well as the relationship between miRNA expression levels, disease activity, and uveitis history. METHODS: This study included 50 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (25 with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and 25 with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis) and 25 healthy individuals. The fold change of miRNA expression for each miRNA was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method. RESULTS: The expression of all miRNAs except miR-130a was downregulated in axial spondyloarthritis patients (miR-27a: fold regulation: -11.21, p<0.001; miR-29a-3p: fold regulation: -2.63, p<0.001; miR-32: fold regulation: -2.94, p=0.002; miR-126-3p: fold regulation -10.94, p<0.001; miR-132: fold regulation: -2.18, p<0.001; miR-146-5p: fold regulation: -9.78, p<0.001; miR-218: fold regulation: -2.65, p<0.001; miR-625-3p: fold regulation: -2.01, p=0.001; miR-5196-3p: fold regulation: -7.04, p<0.001). The expression levels of these miRNAs did not differ significantly between non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients (p>0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: Particularly, miR-27a, miR-126-3p, miR-146-5p, and miR-5196-3p were found to be substantially downregulated in both non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients, suggesting their potential as diagnostic biomarkers for axial spondyloarthritis.

Differences between radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients in a Mexican cohort.

To compare the demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics, disease onset, and clinical features of radiographic axial Spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) and non-radiographic axial Spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients. All patients who attended outpatient spondylarthritis (SpA) clinics at Hospital General de Mexico and the Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición from 1998 to 2005 and met the rheumatologist diagnostic criteria for SpA were selected. Then the SpA patients were classified by European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group criteria (ESSG). We selected SpA patients with axial presentation as axial SpA (axSpA), and they were classified as r-axSpA if they met modified New York (mNY) criteria for sacroiliitis and as nr-axSpA if they did not meet mNY criteria; to compared clinical, demographic, and laboratory test between the subgroups. It included 148 SpA patients; 55 (37.2%) patients had r-axSpA, and 70 (47.3%) had nr-axSpA. The nr-axSpA patients had a lower proportion of males (58.6% vs 78.2%, P < 0.05), lower HLA-B27 frequency (54.3%. vs. 92.7%, P < 0.05), were older at disease onset (21 vs 16 years; P < 0.01) and had a higher frequency of infections at disease onset (9.1% vs 32.9, P < 0.05) than r-axSpA. BASFI (2.9 vs 4.8; P < 0.0001), Dougados functional index (7 vs. 14; P < 0.05), and BASDAI (4.1 vs. 5.2; P < 0.001) were lower in patients with nr-axSpA than r-axSpA, respectively. The factors that most influenced the presentation of r-axSpA were history of uveitis (OR 14, 95% CI 2.3-85), HLA-B27 (OR 7.97, 95% CI, 2.96-122), male sex (OR 6.16, 95% CI, 1.47-25.7), axial enthesopathy count (OR 1.17 95% CI, 1.03-1.33). This study provides insight into the differences between nr-axSpA and r-axSpA in Mexico. Patients with r-axSpA were mainly male, with a younger presentation age, a higher prevalence of HLA-B27, more history of uveitis, fewer episodes of dactylitis, more axial enthesopathy, and higher disease activity than nr-axSpA.

Axial Spondyloarthritis: Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Classification Improve Report Interpretation.

OBJECTIVE: The interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports is crucial for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis, but the subjective nature of narrative reports can lead to varying interpretations. This study presents a validation of a novel MRI reporting system for the sacroiliac joint in clinical practice. METHODS: A historical review was conducted on 130 consecutive patients referred by 2 rheumatologists for initial MRI assessment of possible axial spondyloarthritis. The original MRI reports were interpreted by the rheumatologists and the radiologist who originally read the images and then categorized according to the novel system. Two musculoskeletal radiologists then reinterpreted the original MRI scans using the new system, and the resulting reports were interpreted and categorized by the same rheumatologists. The quality of the new framework was assessed by comparing the interpretations of both reports. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients met the study criteria. The rheumatologists disagreed on the categorization of the original MRI reports in 12% of cases. The rheumatologists and original radiologists disagreed on the categorization of the initial report in 23.4% of cases. In contrast, there was 100% agreement between the rheumatologists and radiologists on the categorization of the new MRI report. CONCLUSION: The new MRI categorization system significantly improved the agreement between the clinician and radiologist in report interpretation. The system provided a standard vocabulary for reporting, reduced variability in report interpretation, and may therefore improve clinical decision-making.

MRI-based synthetic CT: a new method for structural damage assessment in the spine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - a comparison with low-dose CT and radiography.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT), low-dose CT (ldCT) and radiography to detect spinal new bone formation (NBF) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Radiography of lumbar and cervical spine, ldCT and sCT of the entire spine were performed in 17 patients with axSpA. sCT was reconstructed using the BoneMRI application (V.1.6, MRIGuidance BV, Utrecht, NL), a quantitative three-dimensional MRI-technique based on a dual-echo gradient sequence and a machine learning processing pipeline that can generate CT-like MR images. Images were anonymised and scored by four readers blinded to other imaging/clinical information, applying the Canada-Denmark NBF assessment system. RESULTS: Mean scores of NBF lesions for the four readers were 188/209/37 for ldCT/sCT/radiography. Most NBF findings were at anterior vertebral corners with means 163 on ldCT, 166 on sCT and 35 on radiography. With ldCT of the entire spine as reference standard, the sensitivity to detect NBF was 0.67/0.13 for sCT/radiography; both with specificities >0.95. For levels that were assessable on radiography (C2-T1 and T12-S1), the sensitivity was 0.61/0.48 for sCT/radiography, specificities >0.90. For facet joints, the sensitivity was 0.46/0.03 for sCT/radiography, specificities >0.94. The mean inter-reader agreements (kappa) for all locations were 0.68/0.58/0.56 for ldCT/sCT/radiography, best for anterior corners. CONCLUSION: With ldCT as reference standard, MRI-based sCT of the spine showed very high specificity and a sensitivity much higher than radiography, despite limited reader training. sCT could become highly valuable for detecting/monitoring structural spine damage in axSpA, not the least in clinical trials.

Clinical and imaging outcomes of different phenotypes of axial spondyloarthritis: 5-year analysis of the DESIR cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term outcomes of three phenotypes of axial SpA (axSpA). METHODS: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of axSpA from the DESIR cohort were grouped into three phenotypes at baseline: 'Pure axSpA' ('Axial'), 'axSpA with peripheral signs' ('IBP+Peripheral') and 'axSpA at risk' ('At risk') by latent class analysis. Clinical and imaging data were collected up to 5 years. Clinical outcomes, measured in each visit, included disability (BASFI) and quality of life (QoL; SF36). Imaging outcomes included inflammatory and structural lesions on MRI and radiographs of spine and SIJ. The association between phenotype membership at baseline and each outcome was tested in multivariable GEE models. RESULTS: In total, 576 patients with axSpA were included. 'At risk' patients had worse disability and QoL than 'Axial' patients over time. For instance, 'At risk' patients had on average 0.4 more points in BASFI over time than 'Axial' patients [ß (95 % CI): 0.4 (0.2; 0.7)]. This difference was mostly noted in female patients who were HLA-B27 positive. In addition, the difference between the 'At risk' and 'Axial' phenotypes was higher in patients receiving bDMARDs than in those not (ß=0.6 vs 0.5), since BASFI improved more in 'Axial' (∆BASFI: -1.3) than in 'At risk' (∆BASFI: -0.9) treated patients. There were no differences in disability and QoL between 'Axial' and 'IBP+Peripheral' patients. Imaging outcomes were worse in the 'Axial' phenotype than in the others over time. CONCLUSION: Patients with 'axSpA at risk' show worse self-reported outcomes over time and are less likely to benefit from anti-inflammatory treatment than those with a classical axSpA phenotype.

Erosions on T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Radiography of Sacroiliac Joints in Recent-Onset Axial Spondyloarthritis: 2-Year Data (EMBARK Trial and DESIR Cohort).

OBJECTIVE: (1) To compare the capacity to detect sacroiliac joint (SIJ) erosions and baseline-to-week 104 change in erosions between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographs in recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); and (2) to compare treatment-discriminatory capacities of MRI and radiographic scores for erosion detection in patients receiving etanercept in the Effect of Etanercept on Symptoms and Objective Inflammation in Nonradiographic axSpA (EMBARK) trial vs controls in the DESIR (Devenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifférenciées Récentes) cohort. METHODS: Anonymized SIJ MRI and radiographs were assessed at patient and joint surface levels. Three readers evaluated MRI; 3 different readers evaluated radiographs. Final scores for comparison of radiographs and MRI for detection of erosions were assigned based on agreement of ≥ 2 of 3 readers' assessments. RESULTS: At baseline, discordance in erosion detection between imaging methods was more frequent for MRI erosions in the absence of radiographic erosions (48/224 [21.4%] patients) than for radiographic erosions in the absence of MRI erosions (14/224 [6.3%] patients; P < 0.001). After 104 weeks, a decrease in erosions was observed on MRI but not radiographs in 49/221 (22.2%) patients, and on radiographs but not MRI in 6/221 (2.7%) patients (P < 0.001). In the treatment-discriminant capacity analysis, the largest standardized differences between etanercept and control cohorts at week 104 were changes in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI erosion discrete score, changes in erosion average score, and meeting the modified New York criteria on radiographs, with unadjusted/adjusted Hedges G effect sizes of 0.40/0.50, 0.40/0.56, and 0.40/0.43, respectively. CONCLUSION: In recent-onset axSpA, SIJ erosions and erosion change were observed more frequently on MRI than radiography. The significance of interval improvement of MRI erosions warrants further research. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01258738, NCT01648907].

Characterization of bone marrow lesions in axial spondyloarthritis using quantitative T1 mapping MRI.

OBJECTIVE: Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) uses T1-weighted and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences to characterize bone marrow in axial spondyloarthritis. However, quantification is restricted to estimating the extent of lesions because signal intensities are highly variable both within individuals and across patients and MRI scanners. This study evaluates the performance of quantitative T1 mapping for distinguishing different types of bone marrow lesions of the sacroiliac joints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 62 patients underwent computed tomography (CT) and MRI of the sacroiliac joints including T1, STIR, and T1 mapping. Bone marrow lesions were characterized by three readers and assigned to one of four groups: sclerosis, osteitis, fat lesions, and mixed marrow lesions. Relaxation times on T1 maps were compared using generalized estimating equations and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 119 lesions were selected (sclerosis: 38, osteitis: 27, fat lesions: 40; mixed lesions: 14). T1 maps showed highly significant differences between the lesions with the lowest values for sclerosis (1516±220 ms), followed by osteitis (1909±75 ms), and fat lesions (2391±200 ms); p<0.001. T1 mapping differentiated lesions with areas under the ROC curve of 99% (sclerosis vs. osteitis) and 100% (other comparisons). CONCLUSION: T1 mapping allows accurate characterization of sclerosis, osteitis, and fat lesions at the sacroiliac joint but only for homogeneous, non-mixed lesions. Thus, further sequence development is needed before implementation in clinical routine.

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) in axial spondyloarthritis.

Imaging, and particularly MRI, plays a crucial role in the assessment of inflammation in rheumatic disease, and forms a core component of the diagnostic pathway in axial spondyloarthritis. However, conventional imaging techniques are limited by image contrast being non-specific to inflammation and a reliance on subjective, qualitative reader interpretation. Quantitative MRI methods offer scope to address these limitations and improve our ability to accurately and precisely detect and characterise inflammation, potentially facilitating a more personalised approach to management. Here, we review quantitative MRI methods and emerging quantitative imaging biomarkers for imaging inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis. We discuss the potential benefits as well as the practical considerations that must be addressed in the movement toward clinical translation of quantitative imaging biomarkers.

Three-Dimensional Isotropic Versus Conventional Multisequence 2-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Sacroiliac Joints in Suspected Axial Spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to systematically evaluate the sacroiliac joints of a consecutive series of patients with clinically suspected axial spondyloarthritis and to compare the diagnostic efficacy of 3-dimensional (3D) imaging versus conventional multisequence 2D techniques for sacroiliitis. METHODS: In this cross-sectional multireader validation study, imaging studies of 104 consecutive patients with clinically suspected axial spondyloarthritis obtained with a rheumatology lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging protocol were evaluated. Three-dimensional coronal oblique reconstructions parallel to the long axis of the sacrum were created. Two blinded readers evaluated 2D and 3D images separately for each study, and findings were compared with the reference standard for the final diagnosis and disease activity. Cohen κ and diagnostic performance measures on 2D and 3D imaging were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: With 2D versus 3D imaging, respectively, the sensitivity for detecting inflammatory cases was 57% versus 62% ( P = 0.1007), the sensitivity for detecting mechanical cases was 89% versus 76% ( P = 0.0312), the sensitivity for detecting active sacroiliitis was 49% versus 64% ( P = 0.0014), and the specificity for detecting active sacroiliitis was 87% versus 76% ( P = 0.0016). Interreader agreement of 2D imaging showed an overall range of κ = 0.27-0.85, and it was best for evaluation of bony ankylosis (κ = 0.85). Interreader agreement of 3D imaging was in an overall range of κ = 0.15-0.64. CONCLUSIONS: Single 3D isotropic magnetic resonance imaging provided adequate assessment of sacroiliac joints in this study and demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity and lower specificity for detecting active sacroiliitis. The initial results indicate that 3D imaging could be used for future works for screening sacroiliitis and abdominopelvic enthesopathy.

Improved Performance of Compartments in Detecting the Activity of Axial Spondyloarthritis Based on IVIM DWI with Optimized Threshold b Value.

PURPOSE: To explore the diagnostic performance of the optimized threshold b values on IVIM to detect the activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients. METHOD: 40 axSpA patients in the active group, 144 axSpA patients in the inactive group, and 20 healthy volunteers were used to evaluate the tissue diffusion coefficient (D slow), perfusion fraction (f), and pseudodiffusion coefficient (D fast) with b thresholds of 10, 20, and 30 s/mm2. The Kruskal-Wallis test and one way ANOVA test was used to compare the different activity among the three groups in axSpA patients, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied to evaluate the performance for D slow, f, and D fast to detect the activity in axSpA patients, respectively. RESULTS: D slow demonstrated a statistical difference between two groups (P < 0.05) with all threshold b values. With the threshold b value of 30 s/mm2, f could discriminate the active from control groups (P < 0.05). D slow had similar performance between the active and the inactive groups with threshold b values of 10, 20, and 30 s/mm2 (AUC: 0.877, 0.882, and 0.881, respectively, all P < 0.017). Using the optimized threshold b value of 30 s/mm2, f showed the best performance to separate the active from the inactive and the control groups with AUC of 0.613 and 0.738 (both P < 0.017) among all threshold b values. CONCLUSION: D slow and f exhibited increased diagnostic performance using the optimized threshold b value of 30 s/mm2 compared with 10 and 20 s/mm2, whereas D fast did not.

Imaging Outcomes for Axial Spondyloarthritis and Sensitivity to Change: A Five-Year Analysis of the DESIR Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity to change of different imaging scoring methods in patients with early axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: Patients from the Devenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifferérenciées Récentes (DESIR) cohort fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria for axial SpA were included. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac (SI) joints and spine were obtained at baseline, 1, 2, and 5 years. Each image was scored by 2 or 3 readers in 3 separate reading waves. The rate of change of outcomes measuring inflammation of the spine and SI joints (e.g., Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] score) and structural damage on MRI (e.g., ≥3 fatty lesions) and radiographs (e.g., modified New York grading) was assessed using multilevel generalized estimating equation models (taking all readers and waves into account). To allow comparisons across outcomes, rates were standardized (difference between the individual's value and the population mean divided by the SD). RESULTS: In total, 345 patients were included. Inflammation detected on MRI of the SI joints (MRI-SI joints) (standardized rate range -0.278, -0.441) was more sensitive to change compared to spinal inflammation (range -0.030, -0.055). Structural damage in the SI joints showed a higher standardized rate of change on MRI-SI joints (range 0.015, 0.274) compared to radiography of the SI joints (range 0.043, 0.126). MRI-SI joints damage defined by ≥3 fatty lesions showed the highest sensitivity to change (0.274). Spinal structural damage slowly progressed over time with no meaningful difference between radiographic (range 0.037, 0.043) and MRI structural outcomes (range 0.008, 0.027). CONCLUSION: Structural damage assessed in pelvic radiographs has low sensitivity to change, while fatty lesions detected on MRI-SI joints are a promising alternative. In contrast, MRI of the spine is not better than radiography of the spine in detecting structural changes in patients with early axial SpA.

Inflammation of the Sacroiliac Joints and Spine and Structural Changes on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Five-Year Data From the DESIR Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To test the impact of inflammation on structural changes occurring in the sacroiliac (SI) joints and the spine detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Patients with early axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) from the Devenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifferérenciées Récentes (DESIR) cohort were included. MRIs of the SI joints (MRI-SI joints) and spine (MRI-spine), obtained at baseline, 2 years, and 5 years, were scored by 3 central readers. Inflammation and structural damage on MRI-SI joints and MRI-spine were defined by the agreement of ≥2 of 3 readers (binary outcomes) and by the average of 3 readers (continuous outcomes). The effect of inflammation (MRI-SI joints/MRI-spine) on damage (MRI-SI joints/MRI-spine, respectively) was evaluated in 2 models: 1) a baseline prediction model (the effect of baseline inflammation on damage assessed at 5 years); and 2) a longitudinal model (the effect of inflammation on structural damage assessed during a 5-year period). RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included. Both the presence of bone marrow edema on MRI-SI joints and on MRI-spine at baseline were predictive of 5-year damage (≥3 fatty lesions) on MRI-SI joints (odds ratio [OR] 4.2 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.4, 7.3]) and MRI-spine (OR 10.7 [95% CI 2.4, 49.0]), respectively, when adjusted for C-reactive protein level. The association was also confirmed in longitudinal models (when adjusted for Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) both in the SI joints (OR 5.1 [95% CI 2.7, 9.6]) and spine (OR 15.6 [95% CI 4.8, 50.3]). Analysis of other structural outcomes (i.e., erosions) on MRI-SI joints yielded similar results. In the spine, a significant association was found for fatty lesions but not for erosions and bone spurs, which occurred infrequently over time. CONCLUSION: We found a predictive and longitudinal association between inflammation detected on MRI and several types of structural damage detected on MRI in patients with early axial SpA, which adds to the evidence for a causal relationship.

Significance of structural changes in the sacroiliac joints of patients with axial spondyloarthritis detected by MRI related to patients symptoms and functioning.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease that manifests primarily in the axial skeleton, initially mostly in the sacroiliac joints (SIJ), usually later spreading to the spine. The disease is characterised by inflammation and new bone formation which are mainly assessed by conventional radiography (CR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and interleukin-17 antagonists have been shown to be efficacious and efficient in patients with axSpA. This treatment seems to also inhibit structural damage, for example, retard radiographic progression. Indeed, a reduction of new bone formation in the spine, as assessed by CR, has been reported to occur after at least 2 years of therapy with TNFi. Recently, a reduction of erosions and ankylosis in the SIJ has also been observed in axSpA patients treated with etanercept and filgotinib. In this narrative review, we discuss the limited significance of such findings.

Quantification of bone marrow oedema and fat metaplasia in sacroiliac joints in spondyloarthritis patients using histographic magnetic resonance imaging analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate a possible basis for a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach that uses histographic analysis to determine bone marrow oedema (BME) and fat metaplasia at sacroiliac joints (SIJs) level in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, consecutive axSpA patients with inflammatory low back pain underwent 1.5-T MRI. MRI images were scored on a 4-point (0-3) scoring system both for BME and fat metaplasia by two radiologists. A region-of-interest based histographic quantitative analysis was used to assess MRI images. Using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) approach was tested the diagnostic accuracy of histographic analysis for detecting BME vs. BME and fat metaplasia on MRI images. RESULTS: 17 of the 43 patients (39.5%) included only had a BME lesion, while the remaining 26 patients (60.5%) had both BME and fat metaplasia at the SIJ level. Inter-rater agreement between readers was good (weighted kappa 0.643). On MRI images, BME and BME+fat metaplasia showed significant difference in histographic analysis (p<0.001), with an AUC-ROC of 0.898, and an optimal cut-off point of 311 at histographic analysis in the distinction of BME vs. fat metaplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Histographic analysis could represent a method for quantifying BME on MRI images of SIJs in patients with axSpA. This type analysis can provide important prognostic information and guide the choice of treatment in patients with sacroiliitis.

Morphological characteristics of sacroiliac joint MRI lesions in axial spondyloarthritis and control subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate SI joint MRI inflammation, structural and degenerative lesion characteristics in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and various control groups. METHODS: Patients with axSpA (n = 41) and lumbar disc herniation (n = 25), women with (n = 46) and without (n = 14) post-partum (childbirth within 4-16 months) buttock/pelvic pain, cleaning assistants (n = 26), long-distance runners (n = 23) and healthy men (n = 29) had MRI of the SI joints prospectively performed. MRI lesions were assessed on nine slices covering the cartilaginous compartment by two experienced readers according to the definitions of the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SI joint inflammation and structural scores, and were evaluated according to depth and extent. Other morphological characteristics were also analysed. RESULTS: Total depth scores for bone marrow oedema (BME) and fat lesion (FAT) and total extent score for erosion were statistically significantly highest in axSpA, while scores for sclerosis were numerically highest in women with post-partum pain. Maximum BME depth >10 mm was frequently and exclusively found in axSpA and post-partum women (39% vs 14-17%) while FAT depth >5 mm was predominantly found in axSpA (76% vs 0-10%). Erosions were primarily seen in axSpA, especially when extensive (≥4 or confluent; 17% vs 0%). Capsulitis was absent in non-axSpA groups. BME and FAT in the ligamentous compartment were primarily found in axSpA (17/22% vs 0/2% in non-axSpA groups). In non-axSpA, osteophytes (axSpA vs non-axSpA: 0% vs 3-17%) and vacuum phenomenon (7% vs 30-66%) were more frequent, and the joint space was wider [mean (s.d.) 1.5 (0.9) vs 2.2 (0.5) mm]. CONCLUSIONS: FAT depth >5 mm, but not BME depth >10 mm, could almost differentiate axSpA patients from all other groups. When excluding post-partum women, BME >5 mm and erosion were highly specific for axSpA.

Choose wisely: imaging for diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of radiography (X-ray, XR), CT and MRI of the sacroiliac joints for diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: 163 patients (89 with axSpA; 74 with degenerative conditions) underwent XR, CT and MR. Three blinded experts categorised the imaging findings into axSpA, other diseases or normal in five separate reading rounds (XR, CT, MR, XR +MR, CT +MR). The clinical diagnosis served as reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity for axSpA and inter-rater reliability were compared. RESULTS: XR showed lower sensitivity (66.3%) than MR (82.0%) and CT (76.4%) and also an inferior specificity of 67.6% vs 86.5% (MR) and 97.3% (CT). XR +MR was similar to MR alone (sensitivity 77.5 %/specificity 87.8%) while CT+MR was superior (75.3 %/97.3%). CT had the best inter-rater reliability (kappa=0.875), followed by MR (0.665) and XR (0.517). XR +MR was similar (0.662) and CT+MR (0.732) superior to MR alone. CONCLUSIONS: XR had inferior diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability compared with cross-sectional imaging. MR alone was similar in diagnostic performance to XR+MR. CT had the best accuracy, strengthening the importance of structural lesions for the differential diagnosis in axSpA.

Prediction of Treatment Response According to ASAS-EULAR Management Recommendations in 1 Year for Hip Involvement in Axial Spondyloarthritis Based on MRI and Clinical Indicators.

Background: To predict the treatment response for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with hip involvement in 1 year based on MRI and clinical indicators. Methods: A total of 77 axSpA patients with hip involvement (60 males; median age, 25 years; interquartile, 22-31 years old) were treated with a drug recommended by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society and the European League Against Rheumatism (ASAS-EULAR) management. They were prospectively enrolled according to Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria. Clinical indicators, including age, gender, disease duration, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), were collected at baseline and in 3 months to 1-year follow-up. Treatment response was evaluated according to ASAS response criteria. MRI indicators consisting of bone marrow edema (BME) in acetabulum and femoral head, hip effusion, fat deposition, thickened synovium, bone erosion, bone proliferation, muscle involvement, enthesitis and bony ankylosis were assessed at baseline. Spearman's correlation analysis was utilized for indicator selection. The selected clinical and MRI indicators were integrated with previous clinical knowledge to develop multivariable logistic regression models. Receiver operator characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the performance of the constructed models. Results: The model combining MR indicators comprising hip effusion, BME in acetabulum and femoral head and clinical indicators consisting of disease duration, ESR and CRP yielded AUC values of 0.811 and 0.753 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: The model combining MRI and clinical indicators could predict treatment response for axSpA with hip involvement in 1 year.

Joint anatomy in axial spondyloarthritis: strong associations between sacroiliac joint form variation and symptomatic disease.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this investigation was to determine the prevalence of variant SI joint forms in symptomatic patients with mechanical joint disease (MJD) and axial SpA (axSpA) compared with control patients. METHOD: A total of 973 patients were included in this cross-sectional study (95 axSpA; 61 MJD; 817 controls); clinical diagnosis, age and gender were noted. An established scoring system was used to classify joint forms on CT scans of the pelvis. Frequencies of joint forms were compared between groups (axSpA; MJD; controls). RESULTS: Patients with MJD exhibited the highest proportion of atypical joints (80.3% in MJD vs 44.1% in axSpA and 37.5% in controls; P < 0.001). Overall, females had a significantly higher proportion of atypical joints than men (65.0 vs 17.8%; P < 0.001); proportions of atypical joints were significantly higher in males with symptomatic joint disease than in male controls: 32.2% in axSpA, 55.0% in MJD and 13.9% in controls; P ≤ 0.001. Two specific joint forms were significantly more prevalent in symptomatic patients than in controls: the iliosacral complex (16.2 vs 4.2%; P < 0.001) and the crescent-shaped ilium (9.1 vs 2.8%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate a strong association between atypical joint forms and symptomatic joint disease.

Predictive value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD3 antibodies alone or in combination with RF and ACPA for the severity of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to analyse the predictive value of anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) and anti-peptidyl-arginine deiminase type-3 (anti-PAD3) antibodies, alone or in combination with RF and ACPA, to identify patients at high risk of developing severe RA outcomes. METHODS: Patients within the Swiss Clinical Quality Management registry with a biobank sample were tested for RF, ACPA, anti-CarP, and anti-PAD3 antibodies. We examined the association of each autoantibody with DAS28, HAQ and radiographic damage (Ratingen) at baseline and longitudinally. RESULTS: Analyses included 851 established RA patients and 516 disease controls [axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA = 320) and PsA (196)]. Anti-CarP and anti-PAD3 antibodies were, respectively, present in 22.4% and 10.7% of the whole RA population, and in 13.2% and 3.8% of the RF and ACPA double seronegative patients. At baseline, RA patients with anti-PAD3 had higher DAS28 (4.2 vs 3.7; P= 0.005) and significantly more radiographic damage (14.9 vs 8.8; P= 0.02) than anti-PAD3-negative patients. In the ACPA-negative subgroup, baseline Ratingen scores were significantly higher in anti-PAD3-positive patients (P= 0.01). The combination of anti-PAD3, RF IgM, and ACPA was associated with significantly higher baseline radiographic scores than the double seropositive group (P= 0.04). The presence of any two of the previous autoantibodies was associated with significantly greater radiographic progression over 10 years than if all were absent (P= 0.02). There were no differences in RA outcome measures with regards to anti-CarP. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PAD3 antibodies are associated with higher disease activity and joint damage scores in RA patients.