Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 149
Filter
1.
J Med Virol ; 94(4): 1670-1688, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34939673

ABSTRACT

Bangladesh is experiencing a second wave of COVID-19 since March 2021, despite the nationwide vaccination drive with ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccine from early February 2021. Here, we characterized 19 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples from COVID-19 suspect patients using genomic and metagenomic approaches. Screening for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and metagenomic sequencing revealed 17 samples of COVID-19 positive (vaccinated = 10, nonvaccinated = 7) and 2 samples of COVID-19 negative. We did not find any significant correlation between associated factors including vaccination status, age or sex of the patients, diversity or abundance of the coinfected organisms/pathogens, and the abundance of SARS-CoV-2. Though the first wave of the pandemic was dominated by clade 20B, Beta, V2 (South African variant) dominated the second wave (January 2021 to May 2021), while the third wave (May 2021 to September 2021) was responsible for Delta variants of the epidemic in Bangladesh including both vaccinated and unvaccinated infections. Noteworthily, the receptor binding domain (RBD) region of S protein of all the isolates harbored similar substitutions including K417N, E484K, and N501Y that signify the Beta, while D614G, D215G, D80A, A67V, L18F, and A701V substitutions were commonly found in the non-RBD region of Spike proteins. ORF7b and ORF3a genes underwent a positive selection (dN/dS ratio 1.77 and 1.24, respectively), while the overall S protein of the Bangladeshi SARS-CoV-2 isolates underwent negative selection pressure (dN/dS = 0.621). Furthermore, we found different bacterial coinfections like Streptococcus agalactiae, Neisseria meningitidis, Elizabethkingia anophelis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas plecoglossicida, expressing a number of antibiotic resistance genes such as tetA and tetM. Overall, this approach provides valuable insights on the SARS-CoV-2 genomes and microbiome composition from both vaccinated and nonvaccinated patients in Bangladesh.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/virology , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/administration & dosage , Metagenomics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/virology , Bangladesh/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/microbiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Coinfection/epidemiology , Coinfection/microbiology , Coinfection/virology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Female , Genome, Bacterial/genetics , Genome, Viral/genetics , Humans , Male , Microbiota/genetics , Middle Aged , Mutation , Phylogeny , SARS-CoV-2/classification , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Selection, Genetic , Vaccination , Viral Proteins/genetics , Young Adult
2.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(1 Suppl): 101-107, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34890040

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to show the importance of developing techniques that could exploit the potential of bacteriophages as therapeutics or food supplements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed database was searched using the following combination of keywords: (bacteriophage) AND (human therapy); (natural bacteriophage) AND (application). RESULTS: The increasing antibiotic resistance of many bacterial strains is making standard antibiotic treatments less effective. Phage therapy provides a non-antibiotic alternative with greater specificity and without harmful effects on the human microbiota. Phages target their specific bacteria, replicate, and then, destroy the host pathogen. Bacteriophages may be administered by several routes, including topical, oral and intravenous. They not only destroy the host pathogen but, in some cases, increase the sensitivity of host bacteria to antibiotics. Various studies have shown that combining phage therapy and antibiotic treatment can be effective against bacterial infections. Clinical trials of phage therapy have shown promising results for various human diseases and conditions. With advances in genetic engineering and molecular techniques, bacteriophages will be able to target a wide range of bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: In the future, phage therapy promises to become an effective therapeutic option for bacterial infections. Since many potentially beneficial bacteriophages can be found in food, supplements containing bacteriophages could be designed to remodel gut microbiota and eliminate pathogenic bacteria. Remodeling of gut microbiota could correct gut dysbiosis. The order of phages known to have these promising activities is Caudovirales, especially the families Siphoviridae and Myoviridae.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/therapy , Bacteriophages , Phage Therapy/methods , Bacterial Infections/physiopathology , Bacterial Infections/virology , Bacteriophages/isolation & purification , Bacteriophages/physiology , Culture Techniques/methods , Culture Techniques/trends , Dysbiosis/physiopathology , Dysbiosis/therapy , Dysbiosis/virology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Humans , Phage Therapy/trends
3.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(19)2021 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34638776

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic bacteriophages, commonly called as phages, are a promising potential alternative to antibiotics in the management of bacterial infections of a wide range of organisms including cultured fish. Their natural immunogenicity often induces the modulation of a variated collection of immune responses within several types of immunocytes while promoting specific mechanisms of bacterial clearance. However, to achieve standardized treatments at the practical level and avoid possible side effects in cultivated fish, several improvements in the understanding of their biology and the associated genomes are required. Interestingly, a particular feature with therapeutic potential among all phages is the production of lytic enzymes. The use of such enzymes against human and livestock pathogens has already provided in vitro and in vivo promissory results. So far, the best-understood phages utilized to fight against either Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacterial species in fish culture are mainly restricted to the Myoviridae and Podoviridae, and the Siphoviridae, respectively. However, the current functional use of phages against bacterial pathogens of cultured fish is still in its infancy. Based on the available data, in this review, we summarize the current knowledge about phage, identify gaps, and provide insights into the possible bacterial control strategies they might represent for managing aquaculture-related bacterial diseases.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/therapy , Myoviridae , Phage Therapy , Podoviridae , Siphoviridae , Animals , Bacterial Infections/virology , Humans
4.
Front Immunol ; 12: 696003, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34177963

ABSTRACT

Antiviral, antibacterial, and antiparasitic drugs and vaccines are essential to maintaining the health of humans and animals. Yet, their production can be slow and expensive, and efficacy lost once pathogens mount resistance. Chicken immunoglobulin Y (IgY) is a highly conserved homolog of human immunoglobulin G (IgG) that has shown benefits and a favorable safety profile, primarily in animal models of human infectious diseases. IgY is fast-acting, easy to produce, and low cost. IgY antibodies can readily be generated in large quantities with minimal environmental harm or infrastructure investment by using egg-laying hens. We summarize a variety of IgY uses, focusing on their potential for the detection, prevention, and treatment of human and animal infections.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Chickens/immunology , Immunoassay , Immunoglobulins/therapeutic use , Parasitic Diseases/drug therapy , Virus Diseases/drug therapy , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Protozoan/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Protozoan/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibody Formation , Antibody Specificity , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/immunology , Bacterial Infections/virology , Humans , Immunoglobulins/biosynthesis , Immunoglobulins/immunology , Parasitic Diseases/diagnosis , Parasitic Diseases/immunology , Parasitic Diseases/virology , Predictive Value of Tests , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/immunology , Virus Diseases/virology
5.
Gut Microbes ; 13(1): 1-13, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33870869

ABSTRACT

About 100 years ago, the first antibiotic drug was introduced into health care. Since then, antibiotics have made an outstanding impact on human medicine. However, our society increasingly suffers from collateral damage exerted by these highly effective drugs. The rise of resistant pathogen strains, combined with a reduction of microbiota diversity upon antibiotic treatment, has become a significant obstacle in the fight against invasive infections worldwide.Alternative and complementary strategies to classical "Fleming antibiotics" comprise microbiota-based treatments such as fecal microbiota transfer and administration of probiotics, live-biotherapeutics, prebiotics, and postbiotics. Other promising interventions, whose efficacy may also be influenced by the human microbiota, are phages and vaccines. They will facilitate antimicrobial stewardship, to date the only globally applied antibiotic resistance mitigation strategy.In this review, we present the available evidence on these nontraditional interventions, highlight their interaction with the human microbiota, and discuss their clinical applicability.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/immunology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Immunity , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacterial Infections/virology , Bacteriophages , Biological Therapy , Dysbiosis , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation , Host Microbial Interactions , Humans , Prebiotics , Probiotics , Vaccines
6.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(7)2021 Mar 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33810619

ABSTRACT

Obesity is a globally increasing health problem, entailing diverse comorbidities such as infectious diseases. An obese weight status has marked effects on lung function that can be attributed to mechanical dysfunctions. Moreover, the alterations of adipocyte-derived signal mediators strongly influence the regulation of inflammation, resulting in chronic low-grade inflammation. Our review summarizes the known effects regarding pulmonary bacterial and viral infections. For this, we discuss model systems that allow mechanistic investigation of the interplay between obesity and lung infections. Overall, obesity gives rise to a higher susceptibility to infectious pathogens, but the pathogenetic process is not clearly defined. Whereas, viral infections often show a more severe course in obese patients, the same patients seem to have a survival benefit during bacterial infections. In particular, we summarize the main mechanical impairments in the pulmonary tract caused by obesity. Moreover, we outline the main secretory changes within the expanded adipose tissue mass, resulting in chronic low-grade inflammation. Finally, we connect these altered host factors to the influence of obesity on the development of lung infection by summarizing observations from clinical and experimental data.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/complications , Lung/microbiology , Lung/virology , Obesity/complications , Virus Diseases/complications , Adipocytes/metabolism , Adipokines/metabolism , Adiponectin , Adipose Tissue , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/virology , Cells, Cultured , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Inflammation , Leptin/physiology , Lung/physiopathology , Macrophages/metabolism , Male , Mice , Obesity/microbiology , Obesity/virology , Risk Factors , Virus Diseases/microbiology , Virus Diseases/virology
7.
Microbes Infect ; 23(4-5): 104806, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33684520

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate the frequency and characteristics of respiratory co-infections in COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this retrospective observational study, pathogens responsible for potential co-infections were detected by the bacterial culture, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), or serological fungal antigen tests. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as microbial results, were analyzed. Bacterial culture identified 56 (58.3%) positive samples for respiratory pathogens, with the most common bacteria being Burkholderia cepacia (18, 18.8%). RT-PCR detected 38 (76.0%) and 58 (87.9%) positive results in the severe and critical groups, respectively. Most common pathogens detected were Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (28.0%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28.0%) in the severe group and S. maltophilia (45.5%) in the critical group. P. aeruginosa was detected more during the early stage after ICU admission. Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus were more frequently identified during late ICU admission. Fungal serum antigens were more frequently positive in the critical group than in the severe group, and the positive rate of fungal serum antigens frequency increased with prolonged ICU stay. A high frequency of respiratory co-infections presented in ICU COVID-19 patients. Careful examinations and necessary tests should be performed to exclude these co-infections.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Mycoses/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Infections/virology , COVID-19/microbiology , China/epidemiology , Coinfection/microbiology , Coinfection/virology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Mycoses/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology
8.
ACS Infect Dis ; 7(2): 203-205, 2021 02 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33502840

ABSTRACT

Bacterial coinfection in COVID-19 patients has the potential to complicate treatments and accelerate the development of antibiotic resistance in the clinic due to the widespread use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, including in Indonesia. The surge of COVID-19 patients may worsen antibiotic overuse; therefore, information on the actual extent of bacterial coinfection in COVID-19 patients in Indonesia is crucial to inform appropriate treatment. This Viewpoint elaborates on a nascent research project focused on sequencing of swab samples to detect bacterial coinfection in COVID-19 patients in Indonesia. Supported by a L'Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science National Fellowship, it is designed to inform better clinical management of COVID-19 in Indonesia.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Infections/virology , COVID-19/microbiology , Coinfection/microbiology , Coinfection/virology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/virology , Coinfection/drug therapy , Coinfection/epidemiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Humans , Indonesia , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33495224

ABSTRACT

The role of procalcitonin in identifying community-associated bacterial infections among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 is not yet established. In 2,443 patients of whom 148 had bacterial coinfections, mean procalcitonin levels were significantly higher with any bacterial infection (13.16 ± 51.19 ng/ml; P = 0.0091) and with bacteremia (34.25 ± 85.01 ng/ml; P = 0.0125) than without infection (2.00 ± 15.26 ng/ml). Procalcitonin (cutoff, 0.25 or 0.50 ng/ml) did not reliably identify bacterial coinfections but may be useful in excluding bacterial infection.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , COVID-19/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Procalcitonin/therapeutic use , Aged , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/virology , Coinfection/drug therapy , Coinfection/microbiology , Coinfection/virology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
10.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 24: 45-47, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33307276

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have reported high antibiotic use in patients hospitalised for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), resulting in concerns of increasing antimicrobial resistance with increase antibiotic use in this pandemic. Point prevalence survey (PPS) can be a quick tool to provide antibiotic prescribing information to aid antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities. OBJECTIVES: To describe antibiotic utilization and evaluate antibiotic appropriateness in COVID-19 patients using PPS. METHODS: Adapting Global-PPS on antimicrobial use, the survey was conducted in COVID-19 wards at 2 centres in Singapore on 22 April 2020 at 0800h. Patients on systemic antibiotics were included and evaluated for antibiotic appropriateness. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy-seven patients were screened. Thirty-six (6.2%) patients were on antibiotics and which were started at median of 7 days (inter-quartile rate (IQR), 4, 11) from symptom onset. Fifty-one antibiotics were prescribed in these patients. Overall, co-amoxiclav (26/51, 51.0%) was the most often prescribed antibiotic. Thirty-one out of 51 (60.8%) antibiotic prescriptions were appropriate. Among 20 inappropriate prescriptions, 18 (90.0%) were initiated in patients with low likelihood of bacterial infections. Antibiotic prescriptions were more appropriate when reviewed by infectious diseases physicians (13/31 [41.9%] versus 2/20 [10.0%], p=0.015), and if reasons for use were stated in notes (31/31 [100.0%] versus 16/20 [80.0%], p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Despite low prevalence of antibiotic use among confirmed and suspected COVID-19 patients at 2 centres in Singapore, there was significant proportion of inappropriate antibiotics use where bacterial infections were unlikely. AMS teams can tailor stewardship strategies using PPS results.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/microbiology , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/virology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Female , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Singapore/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Microb Pathog ; 150: 104706, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33347962

ABSTRACT

To explore the applicability of MuLBSTA Score in COVID-19 patients, a retrospective analysis was performed on 330 cases of COVID-19 patients in Southeast Hospital of Xiaogan City, Hubei Province. The clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients were described and multilobe infiltrate in CT, bacterial infection, lymphocyte count, smoke in history, history of hypertension, and age distribution in the population of mild and severe patients were analyzed. All included patients were scored according to the MuLBSTA early warning scoring system and its efficacy in early warning of severe symptoms was analyzed. CT feature of infiltration changes on multiple lobes, the absolute value of lymphocyte count of less than 0.8 × 109, accompanied by bacterial infection, history of smoking, history of hypertension, and an age of greater than 60 years old were all statistically significant factors in patients with severe COVID-19. ROC curve analysis indicated that the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the early warning system were 0.651, 0.954 and 0.93, respectively. The MuLBSTA Score has a good early warning effect on severe COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Infections/virology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/microbiology , COVID-19 Testing , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Smoking
12.
Front Immunol ; 11: 1805, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33193291

ABSTRACT

Parasites, bacteria, and viruses pose serious threats to public health. Many parasite infections, including infections of protozoa and helminths, can inhibit inflammatory responses and impact disease outcomes caused by viral, bacterial, or other parasitic infections. Type I interferon (IFN-I) has been recognized as an essential immune effector in the host defense against various pathogens. In addition, IFN-I responses induced by co-infections with different pathogens may vary according to the host genetic background, immune status, and pathogen burden. However, there is only limited information on the roles of IFN-I in co-infections with parasites and viruses, bacteria, or other parasites. This review summarizes some recent findings on the roles of IFN-I in co-infections with parasites, including Leishmania spp., Plasmodium spp., Eimeria maxima, Heligmosomoides polygyrus, Brugia malayi, or Schistosoma mansoni, and viruses or bacteria and co-infections with different parasites (such as co-infection with Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii, and co-infection with Plasmodium spp. and H. polygyrus). The potential mechanisms of host responses associated with co-infections, which may provide targets for immune intervention and therapies of the co-infections, are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/immunology , Bacterial Infections/immunology , Coinfection , Interferon Type I/immunology , Parasites/immunology , Parasitic Diseases/immunology , Virus Diseases/immunology , Viruses/immunology , Animals , Bacteria/pathogenicity , Bacterial Infections/metabolism , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Bacterial Infections/virology , Host-Parasite Interactions , Humans , Interferon Type I/metabolism , Parasites/pathogenicity , Parasitic Diseases/metabolism , Parasitic Diseases/parasitology , Parasitic Diseases/therapy , Signal Transduction , Virus Diseases/metabolism , Virus Diseases/therapy , Virus Diseases/virology , Viruses/pathogenicity
13.
Biochemistry (Mosc) ; 85(9): 1093-1010, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33050848

ABSTRACT

The viruses of bacteria - bacteriophages - were discovered 20 years after the discovery of viruses. However, this was mainly the bacteriophage research that, after the first 40 years, yielded the modern concept of the virus and to large extent formed the grounds of the emerging molecular genetics and molecular biology. Many specific aspects of the bacteriophage research history have been addressed in the existing publications. The integral outline of the events that led to the formation of the key concepts of modern virology is presented in this review. This includes the opposition of F. d'Herelle and J. Bordet viewpoints over the nature of the bacteriophage, the history of lysogeny discovery and of determination of the mechanisms of underlying this phenomenon, the work of the Phage group led by M. Delbruck in USA, the development of the genetic analysis of bacteriophages and other research that eventually led to emergence of the concept of the virus (bacteriophage) as a transmissive genetic program. The review also covers a brief history of early applications of the bacteriophages such as phage therapy and phage typing.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Bacteriophages/physiology , Biomedical Research/history , Molecular Biology/history , Phage Therapy/methods , Virology/history , Bacterial Infections/virology , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Lysogeny
14.
IUBMB Life ; 72(10): 2097-2111, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32770825

ABSTRACT

The pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has affected millions of people worldwide. To date, there are no proven effective therapies for this virus. Efforts made to develop antiviral strategies for the treatment of COVID-19 are underway. Respiratory viral infections, such as influenza, predispose patients to co-infections and these lead to increased disease severity and mortality. Numerous types of antibiotics such as azithromycin have been employed for the prevention and treatment of bacterial co-infection and secondary bacterial infections in patients with a viral respiratory infection (e.g., SARS-CoV-2). Although antibiotics do not directly affect SARS-CoV-2, viral respiratory infections often result in bacterial pneumonia. It is possible that some patients die from bacterial co-infection rather than virus itself. To date, a considerable number of bacterial strains have been resistant to various antibiotics such as azithromycin, and the overuse could render those or other antibiotics even less effective. Therefore, bacterial co-infection and secondary bacterial infection are considered critical risk factors for the severity and mortality rates of COVID-19. Also, the antibiotic-resistant as a result of overusing must be considered. In this review, we will summarize the bacterial co-infection and secondary bacterial infection in some featured respiratory viral infections, especially COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Bacterial/epidemiology , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Acinetobacter baumannii/pathogenicity , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/virology , COVID-19/microbiology , COVID-19/virology , Coinfection , Haemophilus influenzae/drug effects , Haemophilus influenzae/pathogenicity , Host-Pathogen Interactions/immunology , Humans , Immunity, Innate/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/pathogenicity , Legionella pneumophila/drug effects , Legionella pneumophila/pathogenicity , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/virology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/pathogenicity , Respiratory System/drug effects , Respiratory System/microbiology , Respiratory System/pathology , Respiratory System/virology , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects , Streptococcus pneumoniae/pathogenicity , Streptococcus pyogenes/drug effects , Streptococcus pyogenes/pathogenicity , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
15.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 104(18): 7777-7785, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32780290

ABSTRACT

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel ß-coronavirus, is the main pathogenic agent of the rapidly spreading pneumonia called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 infects much more people, especially the elder population, around the world than other coronavirus, such as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, which is challenging current global public health system. Beyond the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2, microbial coinfection plays an important role in the occurrence and development of SARS-CoV-2 infection by raising the difficulties of diagnosis, treatment, prognosis of COVID-19, and even increasing the disease symptom and mortality. We summarize the coinfection of virus, bacteria and fungi with SARS-CoV-2, their effects on COVID-19, the reasons of coinfection, and the diagnosis to emphasize the importance of microbial coinfection in COVID-19. KEY POINTS: • Microbial coinfection is a nonnegligible factor in COVID-19. • Microbial coinfection exacerbates the processes of the occurrence, development and prognosis of COVID-19, and the difficulties of clinical diagnosis and treatment. • Different virus, bacteria, and fungi contributed to the coinfection with SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Cytokine Release Syndrome/epidemiology , Lymphopenia/epidemiology , Mycoses/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/virology , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Coinfection , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/microbiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Cytokine Release Syndrome/drug therapy , Cytokine Release Syndrome/microbiology , Cytokine Release Syndrome/virology , Cytokines/biosynthesis , Disease Progression , Host-Pathogen Interactions/immunology , Humans , Immunity, Innate/drug effects , Lymphocytes/microbiology , Lymphocytes/virology , Lymphopenia/drug therapy , Lymphopenia/microbiology , Lymphopenia/virology , Mycoses/drug therapy , Mycoses/microbiology , Mycoses/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/microbiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Virus Diseases/drug therapy , Virus Diseases/microbiology , Virus Diseases/virology
16.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 9(1): 1958-1964, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32815458

ABSTRACT

Objectives Severe or critical COVID-19 is associated with intensive care unit admission, increased secondary infection rate, and would lead to significant worsened prognosis. Risks and characteristics relating to secondary infections in severe COVID-19 have not been described. Methods Severe and critical COVID-19 patients from Shanghai were included. We collected lower respiratory, urine, catheters, and blood samples according to clinical necessity and culture and mNGS were performed. Clinical and laboratory data were archived. Results We found 57.89% (22/38) patients developed secondary infections. The patient receiving invasive mechanical ventilation or in critical state has a higher chance of secondary infections (P<0.0001). The most common infections were respiratory, blood-stream and urinary infections, and in respiratory infections, the most detected pathogens were gram-negative bacteria (26, 50.00%), following by gram-positive bacteria (14, 26.92%), virus (6, 11.54%), fungi (4, 7.69%), and others (2, 3.85%). Respiratory Infection rate post high flow, tracheal intubation, and tracheotomy were 12.90% (4/31), 30.43% (7/23), and 92.31% (12/13) respectively. Secondary infections would lead to lower discharge rate and higher mortality rate. Conclusion Our study originally illustrated secondary infection proportion in severe and critical COVID-19 patients. Culture accompanied with metagenomics sequencing increased pathogen diagnostic rate. Secondary infections risks increased after receiving invasive respiratory ventilations and intravascular devices, and would lead to a lower discharge rate and a higher mortality rate.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/pathology , Bacterial Infections/pathology , Coronavirus Infections/pathology , Fungemia/pathology , Mycoses/pathology , Opportunistic Infections/pathology , Pneumonia, Viral/pathology , Respiratory Tract Infections/pathology , Urinary Tract Infections/pathology , Aged , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Bacteremia/virology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/mortality , Bacterial Infections/virology , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/microbiology , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Critical Illness , Female , Fungemia/microbiology , Fungemia/mortality , Fungemia/virology , Fungi/pathogenicity , Gram-Negative Bacteria/pathogenicity , Gram-Positive Bacteria/pathogenicity , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Lung/microbiology , Lung/pathology , Lung/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Mycoses/microbiology , Mycoses/mortality , Mycoses/virology , Opportunistic Infections/microbiology , Opportunistic Infections/mortality , Opportunistic Infections/virology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/microbiology , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/mortality , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , Risk , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Analysis , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/mortality , Urinary Tract Infections/virology
17.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 26(10): 1395-1399, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32603803

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of bacterial and fungal coinfection of hospitalized patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in this retrospective observational study across two London hospitals during the first UK wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A retrospective case series of hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 by PCR was analysed across two acute NHS hospitals (20 February-20 April 2020; each isolate reviewed independently in parallel). This was contrasted to a control group of influenza-positive patients admitted during the 2019-2020 flu season. Patient demographics, microbiology and clinical outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 836 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 were included; 27 (3.2%) of 836 had early confirmed bacterial isolates identified (0-5 days after admission), rising to 51 (6.1%) of 836 throughout admission. Blood cultures, respiratory samples, pneumococcal or Legionella urinary antigens and respiratory viral PCR panels were obtained from 643 (77%), 110 (13%), 249 (30%), 246 (29%) and 250 (30%) COVID-19 patients, respectively. A positive blood culture was identified in 60 patients (7.1%), of which 39 were classified as contaminants. Bacteraemia resulting from respiratory infection was confirmed in two cases (one each community-acquired Klebsiella pneumoniae and ventilator-associated Enterobacter cloacae). Line-related bacteraemia was identified in six patients (three Candida, two Enterococcus spp. and one Pseudomonas aeruginosa). All other community-acquired bacteraemias (n = 16) were attributed to nonrespiratory infection. Zero concomitant pneumococcal, Legionella or influenza infection was detected. A low yield of positive respiratory cultures was identified; Staphylococcus aureus was the most common respiratory pathogen isolated in community-acquired coinfection (4/24; 16.7%), with pseudomonas and yeast identified in late-onset infection. Invasive fungal infections (n = 3) were attributed to line-related infections. Comparable rates of positive coinfection were identified in the control group of confirmed influenza infection; clinically relevant bacteraemias (2/141; 1.4%), respiratory cultures (10/38; 26.3%) and pneumococcal-positive antigens (1/19; 5.3%) were low. CONCLUSIONS: We found a low frequency of bacterial coinfection in early COVID-19 hospital presentation, and no evidence of concomitant fungal infection, at least in the early phase of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Mycoses/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/virology , COVID-19 , Coinfection , Community-Acquired Infections , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/microbiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/microbiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Mycoses/diagnosis , Mycoses/microbiology , Mycoses/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/microbiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , United Kingdom/epidemiology
19.
J Infect Public Health ; 13(10): 1397-1404, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32712106

ABSTRACT

Secondary bacterial infections are commonly associated with prior or concomitant respiratory viral infections. Viral infections damage respiratory airways and simultaneously defects both innate and acquired immune response that provides a favorable environment for bacterial growth, adherence, and facilitates invasion into healthy sites of the respiratory tract. Understanding the molecular mechanism of viral-induced secondary bacterial infections will provide us a chance to develop novel and effective therapeutic approaches for disease prevention. The present study describes details about the secondary bacterial infection during viral infections and their immunological changes.The outcome of discussion avails an opportunity to understand possible secondary bacterial infections associated with novel SARS-CoV-2, presently causing pandemic outbreak COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/immunology , Bacterial Infections/virology , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Adaptive Immunity , Bacteria/growth & development , Bacterial Adhesion , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Humans , Immune Tolerance , Immunity, Innate , Inflammation/complications , Influenza, Human/complications , Microbial Interactions , Pandemics , Patient Acuity , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Annu Rev Virol ; 7(1): 371-384, 2020 09 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32559405

ABSTRACT

Facing frequent phage challenges, bacteria have evolved numerous mechanisms to resist phage infection. A commonly used phage resistance strategy is abortive infection (Abi), in which the infected cell commits suicide before the phage can complete its replication cycle. Abi prevents the phage epidemic from spreading to nearby cells, thus protecting the bacterial colony. The Abi strategy is manifested by a plethora of mechanistically diverse defense systems that are abundant in bacterial genomes. In turn, phages have developed equally diverse mechanisms to overcome bacterial Abi. This review summarizes the current knowledge on bacterial defense via cell suicide. It describes the principles of Abi, details how these principles are implemented in a variety of natural defense systems, and discusses phage counter-defense mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/immunology , Bacteria/virology , Bacterial Infections/immunology , Bacteriophages/pathogenicity , Bacteria/genetics , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Bacterial Infections/virology , Bacteriophages/immunology , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Humans , Toxin-Antitoxin Systems
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...