Lutein and zeaxanthin toxicity with and without brilliant blue in rabbits.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety profile of solutions containing lutein and zeaxanthin alone or associated with brilliant blue (BB). METHODS: Twenty-eight New Zealand rabbits were used to evaluate 4 concentrations of the various dye solutions: 0.5% lutein/zeaxanthin; 0.5% lutein/zeaxanthin associated with 0.0125% BB; 0.3% lutein/zeaxanthin associated with 0.025% BB; and 0.25% lutein/zeaxanthin associated with 0.05% BB. The pHs of the dye solutions ranged from 6.5 to 7.2 and the osmolarities from 280 to 320 mOsm/mL. Each rabbit had 0.1 mL of one of the dyeing solutions injected into the vitreous cavity of the right eye, while balanced salt solution (BSS) was injected into the left eye as the control. Scotopic electroretinography responses were recorded in all eyes at different time points. The animals were sacrificed at 1 and 7 days after injection; the eyes were analyzed by light and transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: No significant (P>0.05) differences were seen in the a- and b-wave amplitudes among groups at any given point in time. Light and electron microscopy findings showed no significant abnormalities either, and were similar to the histological findings after intravitreal BSS injection. CONCLUSIONS: Lutein and zeaxanthin alone or in association with BB showed a good safety profile in this experimental model.

Sorafenib in combination with capecitabine: an oral regimen for patients with HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic/antiproliferative activity. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIB trial assessed sorafenib with capecitabine for locally advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to first- or second-line capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) orally twice a day for days 1 to 14 of every 21-day cycle with sorafenib 400 mg orally twice a day or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In total, 229 patients were enrolled. The addition of sorafenib to capecitabine resulted in a significant improvement in PFS versus placebo (median, 6.4 v 4.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.81; P = .001) with sorafenib favored across subgroups, including first-line (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.82) and second-line (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.04) treatment. There was no significant improvement for overall survival (median, 22.2 v 20.9 months; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.23; P = .42) and overall response (38% v 31%; P = .25). Toxicities (sorafenib v placebo) of any grade included rash (22% v 8%), diarrhea (58% v 30%), mucosal inflammation (33% v 21%), neutropenia (13% v 4%), hypertension (18% v 12%), and hand-foot skin reaction/hand- foot syndrome (HFSR/HFS; 90% v 66%); grade 3 to 4 toxicities were comparable between treatment arms except HFSR/HFS (44% v 14%). Reasons for discontinuation in the sorafenib and placebo arms included disease progression (63% v 82%, respectively), adverse events (20% v 9%, respectively), and death (0% v 1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Addition of sorafenib to capecitabine improved PFS in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. The dose of sorafenib used in this trial resulted in unacceptable toxicity for many patients. A phase III confirmatory trial has been initiated with a reduced sorafenib dose.

Impact of the incorporation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor agents on the treatment of patients with a diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma: study based on experience at the Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias.

INTRODUCTION: For nearly the past two decades, cytokines (CKs) have been the only systemic treatment option available for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In recent years, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated clinical activity on this tumour. Our purpose is to describe one centre's experience with the use of CKs and TKIs in the treatment of patients with advanced RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a retrospective chart review of RCC patients who were treated with CKs and/or TKIs in our department between July 1996 and June 2008. Efficacy and toxicity were assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were classified into three groups depending on the modality of treatment administered: 46 were treated with CKs alone and/or chemotherapy (27 with immunotherapy, one with chemotherapy and 18 with both), 28 with TKIs alone (25 with sunitinib and 13 with sorafenib) and 20 with TKIs in second-line treatment following failure with CKs (17 with sunitinib, eight with sorafenib, four with bevacizumab and one with lapatinib). The median age was 60 years in the CK group and 65 and 62, respectively, in TKI in first and second-line treatment groups. Eighty-five percent of patients treated with CKs and 75% in the TKI group in first-line treatment and 80% in second-line treatment were men. Overall, 89% of patients had favourable risk, and 11% had intermediate risk. All patients were considered evaluable for toxicity. The main grade 3-4 (%) toxicity was asthenia for both groups, (ten in TKIs and 15 in CKs). Other grade 1-2 toxicities were mucositis (39), bleeding (8), hypertension (19), skin toxicity (33) and hypothyroidism (12.5) associated with TKIs; and anaemia (33), cough (29), asthenia (39) and emesis (14) associated with CKs. The objective response rate among 80 patients evaluable for activity was 10.6% with CKs and 46.5% and 35%, respectively, with TKIs in first- and second-line treatments. Disease stabilisation with CKs was recorded at 59% of patients and with TKIs 25% and 50% in first- and second-line treatment groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) with CKs was 122 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 82-162] and with TKIs 201 days (65-337) in the first and 346 days (256-436) in second-line treatment groups. The median overall survival (OS) was 229 days (142-316) and 2,074 days (1,152-2,996) for patients treated with CKs and TKIs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are in line with the activity and survival rates previously reported in the literature regarding the use of TKIs for patients with advanced RCC in first- and second-line treatment, which has demonstrated an acceptable toxicity level.

Influência do alquil benzeno sulfonato de sódio a 11 por cento na adaptaçäo de dois revestimentos sobre uma cera para fundiçäo / Wetting effects of alky benzene sodium sulphonate at 11 per cents on inlay wax-investments combinations

Verificou-se o efeito do tratamento superficial do modelo de cera com o alquil benzeno sulfonato de sódio a 11 por cento na adaptaçäo de 2 revestimentos, um à base de cristobalita e outro, de quartzo. O método utilizado foi o da mensuraçäo do ângulo de contacto formado entre a cera e os revestimentos, estando a superfície da cera antes da inclusäo, tratada com detergente e deixada molhada, e, tratada, porém seca. O ângulo formado foi avaliado através de um microscópio de mensuraçäo Carl Zeiss com dispositivo apropriado. Verificou-se que o alquil benzeno sulfonato de sódio a 11 por cento, melhora a adaptaçäo do revestimento à base de quartzo, porém näo interfere na do revestimento à base de cristobalita, e que näo há superioridade de um método de tratamento sobre o outro, isto é, estando a superfície da cera molhada ou seca