ABSTRACT
The objective of this paper was to investigate the availability of betaine present in fine wheat bran (FWB) in diets for growing pigs. We used thirty crossbred intact males, housed individually in metabolic cages and distributed in a randomized block design, with five treatments and six replicates. Blocks consisted of two periods of 15 days. Average initial body weights were 32.00±1.30 and 44.90±1.32 kg, in the first and second periods, respectively. Treatments were modified only at the level of methionine plus cysteine (Met+Cys) required and the Met+Cys sources, consisting of a negative control (NC), formulated with 80% of Met+Cys requirements, and four positive controls (PC): PCMet - NC supplemented with 1.2 g kg−1 of DL-methionine; PCBet - NC supplemented with 0.9 g kg−1 of anhydrous betaine; PCFWB - diet formulated with FWB; and PCFWB+Met - PCFWB supplemented with 1.0 g kg−1 of DL-methionine. No differences were observed on performance-related variables or on the digestibility coefficient of dry matter. Conversely, the digestibility coefficient of crude energy was lower when pigs were fed FWB and could be associated to the higher fiber content of FWB feeds. Digestible energy of feeds was higher for FWB diets, while the metabolizable energy of FWB diets did not differ from PCMet and PCBet. Nitrogen intake and apparent absorption were lower when pigs were fed FWB, but nitrogen retention, protein utilization, and biological value of the feed protein were the same among PC treatments, indicating that nitrogen from diets was used by pigs with the same efficiency, and is supported by no differences in performance-related variables. The FWB composition showed 12 g of betaine kg−1, which is available to maintain nitrogen retention and performance.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Swine/physiology , Triticum/adverse effects , Betaine/adverse effects , Eating , Methionine/adverse effectsSubject(s)
Betaine/analogs & derivatives , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Skin Tests , Surface-Active Agents/adverse effects , Betaine/adverse effects , Betaine/chemistry , Colombia , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Skin Tests/standards , Surface-Active Agents/chemistryABSTRACT
Introdução: No Brasil, crianças e adolescentes frequentemente utilizam latas em aerossol de neve e serpentinas durante as festividades do carnaval. Material e Métodos: Foi realizada uma avaliação detalhada da composição química descrita no rótulo de oito latas em aerossol de neve artificial e duas latas em aerossol de serpentinas, encontradas no comércio da cidade de Campinas - SP - Brasil. Resultados: Os rótulos dos produtos demonstraram diversas substâncias químicas que podem potencilamente irritar ou causar sensibilização à pele ou mucosas, particularmente o surfactante anfotérico derivado do coco - cocobetaína, resinas acrílicas e propelentes de hidrocarbonetos. Conclusão: Recomendamos que esses produtos, quando aplicados sobre a pele, sejam lavados assim que possível para que se evite possível sensibilização.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adolescent , Aerosols/chemistry , Allergens/adverse effects , Betaine/analogs & derivatives , Betaine/adverse effects , Cocos/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Surface-Active Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
A child with cystathionine beta-synthase deficiency developed cerebral edema 4 to 6 weeks after starting betaine therapy. There was no evidence of intracranial thrombosis, but there was widespread edema of the white matter. He recovered fully after emergency decompressive craniotomy and withdrawal of betaine.