Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 33(2): 251-252, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28451894

ABSTRACT

This quiz will discuss two patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis presenting with diaphoresis and hypernatremia.


Subject(s)
Bethanechol/adverse effects , Hypernatremia/chemically induced , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Muscarinic Agonists/adverse effects , Renal Dialysis/methods , Sweating , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Male
2.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 21(4): 730-6, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21546875

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bethanechol chloride is considered as a treatment in patients with high postvoid residual urine (PVR). It enhances detrusor muscle contraction, resulting in higher maximum flow rate, higher detrusor pressure at maximum flow, and lower PVR. The efficacy of this agent in patients after radical hysterectomy is unclear. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of bethanechol chloride compared with placebo for the prevention of bladder dysfunction after type III radical hysterectomy. METHODS: Gynecologic cancer patients who underwent type III radical hysterectomy were randomized by computer-generated schedule to assign patients in a 1:1 ratio into 2 groups. The treatment group received bethanechol chloride (Ucholine 20 mg 3 times a day on the third to seventh postoperative day), and the control group received placebo. Patients and physicians were masked to treatment allocation. The primary end point was the rate of urethral catheter removal at 1 week postoperatively. If PVR was more than 30% of voided volume, the urethral catheter was reinserted, and medication would be continued but not for more than 1 month. This study was registered as ISRCTN92687416. FINDINGS: There were 31 patients in each group without significant difference in baseline characteristics. Twenty-one patients (67.7%) in the treatment group and 12 patients (38.7%) in the control group had the urethral catheter removed at 1 week postoperatively (P = 0.04). Median duration of urethral catheterization was shorter in the treatment group (7 and 14 days, P = 0.03). However, the PVR and the incidence of urinary tract infection at 1 month postoperatively were not significantly different. Nine patients (29%) in the treatment group had adverse events such as nausea, abdominal distension, and abdominal cramping, which was higher than the control group (1 patient, 3.2%; P = 0.01). However, no patients required any medical treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Bethanechol chloride decreases the duration of urethral catheterization in patients who underwent type III radical hysterectomy with manageable adverse events.


Subject(s)
Bethanechol/therapeutic use , Carcinoma/surgery , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Hysterectomy , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Urinary Bladder Diseases/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Bethanechol/administration & dosage , Bethanechol/adverse effects , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Carcinoma/rehabilitation , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/drug therapy , Genital Neoplasms, Female/rehabilitation , Humans , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Hysterectomy/rehabilitation , Middle Aged , Muscarinic Agonists/administration & dosage , Muscarinic Agonists/adverse effects , Muscarinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Placebos , Postoperative Care , Urinary Bladder/drug effects , Urinary Bladder/physiopathology , Urination/drug effects
4.
Spec Care Dentist ; 26(4): 164-70, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16927740

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to assess the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of pilocarpine, bethanechol and cevimeline in patients with xerostomia. In this open-label crossover assessment in 20 patients with xerostomia, a one- to two-week course of each medication with a one-week washout period was prescribed. Side effects, symptoms, whole stimulated and unstimulated saliva were measured. Each sialogogue was found to increase saliva and decrease symptoms. A mixed-effects analysis showed a greater increase in stimulated saliva on bethanechol compared to pilocarpine (0.106, p = 0.0272). Increased sweating was the most common side effect, experienced more frequently with pilocarpine as compared to bethanechol (p = 0.0588) or cevimeline (p = 0.0143). A carryover effect beyond the washout period was seen. Effects on saliva and side effects vary between sialogogues, suggesting a benefit of trials with different sialogogues to determine individual patient preference. The observed carryover effect suggests that intermittent treatment may be an alternative to continuous treatment with sialogogues.


Subject(s)
Muscarinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Xerostomia/drug therapy , Bethanechol/administration & dosage , Bethanechol/adverse effects , Bethanechol/therapeutic use , Candida/isolation & purification , Candidiasis, Oral/drug therapy , Colony Count, Microbial , Cross-Over Studies , Deglutition/drug effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Muscarinic Agonists/administration & dosage , Muscarinic Agonists/adverse effects , Pilocarpine/administration & dosage , Pilocarpine/adverse effects , Pilocarpine/therapeutic use , Quinuclidines/administration & dosage , Quinuclidines/adverse effects , Quinuclidines/therapeutic use , Saliva/chemistry , Saliva/drug effects , Salivation/drug effects , Speech/drug effects , Sweating/drug effects , Taste/drug effects , Thiophenes/administration & dosage , Thiophenes/adverse effects , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , Xerostomia/microbiology
8.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 43(10): 1359-62, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11052511

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Topical glyceryl trinitrate heals anal fissures, but a majority of patients experience headache. Topical gels of the calcium channel blocker diltiazem and the cholinomimetic bethanechol significantly lower anal sphincter pressure in volunteers. This study investigated the use of these two new pharmacologic agents in the treatment of patients with chronic anal fissure. METHODS: Two studies were conducted, each involving 15 patients with chronic anal fissure. In each study patients underwent anal manometry and laser doppler flowmetry before treatment. They were treated with either 2 percent diltiazem gel or 0.1 percent bethanechol gel three times daily for eight weeks. Assessment every two weeks was by clinical examination, repeat anal manometry, and laser doppler flowmetry. Daily pain was assessed by linear analog charts. RESULTS: Fissures healed in 10 of 15 (67 percent) patients treated with 2 percent diltiazem gel and in 9 (60 percent) patients treated with 0.1 percent bethanechol gel. There was no significant difference in the pretreatment maximum resting sphincter pressure (MRP) between responders and nonresponders in either group. There was significant reduction in the pain score after treatment with diltiazem (P = 0.002) and bethanechol (P = 0.005) compared with that before treatment. MRP was significantly lower after diltiazem (P = 0.0001) and bethanechol (P = 0.02) compared with pretreatment MRP. No headaches or side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Both topical diltiazem and bethanechol substantially reduce anal sphincter pressure and achieve fissure healing to a similar degree reported with topical nitrates, but without side effects.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/drug effects , Bethanechol/administration & dosage , Calcium Channel Blockers/administration & dosage , Diltiazem/administration & dosage , Fissure in Ano/drug therapy , Parasympathomimetics/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Adult , Aged , Anal Canal/physiology , Bethanechol/adverse effects , Calcium Channel Blockers/adverse effects , Diltiazem/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Pain/drug therapy , Parasympathomimetics/adverse effects , Pilot Projects , Pressure
10.
Nutr Rev ; 54(10): 324-8, 1996 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9063023

ABSTRACT

Hospital malnutrition continues to be a serious problem. Although enteral feeding of hospitalized patients is safe and less expensive than parenteral feeding, it is associated with side effects involving the gastrointestinal tract and respiratory systems.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Pneumonia, Aspiration/etiology , Bethanechol/adverse effects , Bethanechol/therapeutic use , Cisapride , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Humans , Nutrition Disorders/therapy , Parasympathomimetics/adverse effects , Parasympathomimetics/pharmacokinetics , Parasympathomimetics/therapeutic use , Piperidines/pharmacokinetics , Piperidines/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL