Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 226
Filter
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 412, 2024 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bone-modifying agents (BMA) are key components in the management of cancer patients with bone metastasis. Despite their clinical benefits, the use of BMA is associated with dental adverse events (AEs) including medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This study investigated the frequency of dental surveillance before BMA treatment and the prevalence of dental AEs including MRONJ, after BMA treatment in patients with bone metastasis from breast and prostate cancer using data from the national health insurance system. METHODS: Data, including age, cancer diagnosis, administered BMA, and dental AEs during cancer treatment, of patients with bone metastasis from breast and prostate cancer who received at least one infusion of BMA between 2007 and 2019 were extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (KNHIS) dataset. RESULTS: Of the 15,357 patients who received BMA, 1,706 patients (11.1%) underwent dental check-ups before BMA treatment. The proportion of patients receiving dental check-up increased from 4.4% in 2007 to 16.7% in 2019. Referral to dentists for a dental check-up was more active in clinics/primary hospitals than general/tertiary hospitals, and medical doctors and urologists actively consulted to dentists than general surgeons, regardless of the patient's health insurance status. After BMA treatment, 508 patients (3.8%) developed dental AEs, including abscess (42.9%), acute periodontitis (29.7%), acute pericoronitis (14.9%), and MRONJ (12.5% of dental AEs cases, 0.5% of total BMA treated patients). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the long treatment period in patients with metastatic cancer, coordination between dentists and oncologists is necessary to ensure appropriate dental management before the initiation of BMA.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Prostatic Neoplasms , Surgeons , Male , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnosis , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Prevalence , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , National Health Programs , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Diphosphonates/adverse effects
2.
Stomatologiia (Mosk) ; 103(1): 59-62, 2024.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38372609

ABSTRACT

The relevance of the study is associated with the widespread use of osteomodifying agents in patients with bone metastases and osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates and other osteo-modifying agents are widely used in oncology and prevention of age-related changes in the human bone system. The use, therapeutic effects and complications of therapy with osteo modifying agents are being investigated all over the world. However, the etiology and pathogenesis of drug-induced osteonecrosis of the jaws (MONCH) have not been fully studied, in this regard, the study of risk factors and mechanisms of its development remains relevant. New data on the etiology and pathogenesis of drug-induced osteonecrosis are presented. The literature review is carried out on the electronic resource PubMed.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Jaw Diseases , Osteonecrosis , Osteoporosis , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/drug therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Jaw , Jaw Diseases/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(1): e14-e16, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37606539

ABSTRACT

Pathological fracture is one of the most serious complications in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This case is a report of an 87-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with pathological fracture due to MRONJ. The authors performed minimally invasive and conservative treatment, such as intraoral dressing, antibiotic therapy, and simple debridement, for patients with pathologic fractures due to MRONJ. After 1 year, the inflammatory symptoms disappeared and pathological fractures spontaneously recovered.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Fractures, Spontaneous , Female , Humans , Aged, 80 and over , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates
4.
Head Neck ; 46(2): 282-290, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37962011

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe adverse effect of antiresorptive and/or antiangiogenic agents. As the treatment application for MRONJ is controversial, we aimed to identify the risk factors for poor prognosis and to help determine appropriate management. METHODS: This study included 119 patients. Relevant clinical data were obtained for all the patients. In computed tomography images, osteosclerosis, osteolysis, cortical perforation (buccal or lingual), periosteal reaction, and sequestration were evaluated. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses showed statistically significant associations between poor prognosis in patients with MRONJ and conservative treatment alone (hazard ratio [HR] 1.89), osteolysis (HR 4.67), and the absence of sequestration (HR 5.33). CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment alone without clear objectives needs to be avoided, and osteolytic change could be the criteria for surgical intervention. As the boundary between the lesion and vital bone is indistinct, we recommend extensive surgery in cases with unpredictable sequestration.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteolysis , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Osteolysis/chemically induced , Osteolysis/drug therapy , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Jaw
5.
Arch Toxicol ; 98(3): 689-708, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38155341

ABSTRACT

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), a severe side effect caused by antiresorptive antiangiogenic medication, particularly bisphosphonates (BPs), has become a challenging disease with serious and profound effects on the physical and mental health of patients. Although it occurs with high frequency and is harmful, the exact mechanism of MRONJ remains unknown, and systematic and targeted approaches are still lacking. Maxillofacial surgeons focus on the etiology of osteonecrosis in the mandible and maxilla as well as the appropriate oral interventions for high-risk patients. Adequate nursing care and pharmacotherapy management are also crucial. This review provides a current overview of the clinicopathologic feature and research of MRONJ caused by BPs, with an emphasis on the potential mechanisms and current therapy and prevention strategies of the disease. We are of the opinion that an in-depth comprehension of the mechanisms underlying MRONJ will facilitate the development of more precise and efficacious therapeutic approaches, resulting in enhanced clinical outcomes for patients.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control , Bone Density Conservation Agents/toxicity , Diphosphonates/toxicity
6.
J Dent ; 138: 104682, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37708930

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: There is limited scientific evidence regarding the medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) induced by regenerative therapy (RT) associated with dental implant treatment. Thus, the current scoping review systematically maps the MRONJ research induced by RTs in implant dentistry and recognizes the existing gaps in knowledge. DATA: Original studies and reviews investigating the impact of RT on the development of MRONJ were included. SOURCES: Two reviewers independently searched the MEDLINE-PubMed and Scopus databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Review and included articles published in English up to March 31, 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Eighteen articles that fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. Ten mapping parameters for investigating the association of RTs with MRONJ development were examined and evaluated within the selected articles. RESULTS: There was severely limited information regarding the procedures of RTs including; the grafting materials, surgical protocols, and success and failure rates. The RT associated with MRONJ cases was sinus floor augmentation in patients taking bisphosphonate and denosumab. Moreover, there were limited data on the implant treatment associated with RTs such as time of insertion, implant length and diameter, and loading protocol. CONCLUSION: The current scoping review revealed that some specific RTs associated with other factors hold a potential risk of MRONJ occurrence. However, the scientific evidence is limited with many gaps. Further investigations are needed to establish an evidence-based clinical guideline for treating high-risk patients. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians should cautiously assess the risk of MRONJ development during implant treatment planning for patients undertaking antiresorptive medications. The adverse outcome of RT procedures should not be underestimated and a complete explanation of the possible risks should be given to the patients.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Sinus Floor Augmentation , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/drug therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects
7.
Arch Oral Biol ; 155: 105792, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37611492

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current knowledge in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and other relevant clinical and forensic aspects of a potentially severe complication known as medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) while synthesizing state-of-the-art information on bisphosphonates and introducing a possible differential diagnosis. DESIGN: An extensive search was conducted in PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine) without a time or language constraint, focusing on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, site specificity, signs and symptoms, differential diagnosis, prevention, and forensic aspects of MRONJ. All types of original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, opinion articles, guidelines, and letters to editors were considered to produce a complete review on this subject. RESULTS: MRONJ prevention relies on a multidisciplinary approach and is critical since truly effective treatments are lacking. This therapeutic challenge is partly due to uncertainty regarding this condition's pathophysiology. Differential diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with krokodil abuse, one of the most dangerous and homemade psychoactive illicit substances, should be considered. CONCLUSIONS: Further research into the etiology and site specificity of MRONJ is encouraged, aiming to develop novel treatment prospects. Indeed, comprehending this would allow for increased efficacy and therapeutic options while emphasizing the importance of prevention. In addition, we advocate for greater consensus among the various societies regarding MRONJ's treatment and management.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteonecrosis , Humans , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnosis , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/diagnosis , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Risk Factors , Jaw
8.
RFO UPF ; 28(1)20230808. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-1524209

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Este trabalho tem como propósito fornecer uma análise abrangente das características clínicas, etiológicas, radiográficas e histopatológicas da osteonecrose dos maxilares relacionada ao uso de medicamentos, além de abordar os métodos de diagnóstico, prevenção e estratégias terapêuticas. Materiais e métodos: foi realizada uma busca por artigos científicos publicados no período de 2015 a 2023, utilizando as bases de dados Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) e ScienceDirect. Conclusão: Embora infrequente, há um considerável potencial de ocorrência de osteonecrose dos maxilares em pacientes submetidos a terapia prolongada com medicamentos antirreabsortivos e antiangiogênicos, especialmente quando não são adotadas medidas preventivas adequadas. A implementação de práticas preventivas, a vigilância das condições bucais e a colaboração de uma equipe multidisciplinar são fundamentais para reduzir os riscos associados a essa condição patológica.(AU)


Objective: This work aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the clinical, etiological, radiographic and histopathological characteristics of Medication-Related Jaw Osteonecrosis, in addition to addressing diagnostic methods, prevention and therapeutic strategies. Materials and methods: A search was carried out for scientific articles published between 2015 and 2023, using the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and ScienceDirect databases. Conclusion: Although infrequent, there is a considerable potential for osteonecrosis of the jaw to occur in patients undergoing prolonged therapy with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic medications, especially when adequate preventive measures are not adopted. The implementation of preventive practices, surveillance of oral conditions and the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team are essential to reduce the risks associated with this pathological condition.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Jaw Diseases/chemically induced , Jaw Diseases/therapy , Risk Factors , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Denosumab/adverse effects
9.
J Orthop Traumatol ; 24(1): 36, 2023 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37453950

ABSTRACT

This joint report from the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT) and the Italian Society of Periodontology and Implantology (SIdP) aims for a consensus around the scientific rationale and clinical strategy for the management of osteoporotic patients affected by periodontitis who are undergoing anti-resorptive (AR) therapy to manage the risk of the occurrence of a medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ). Osteoporosis and periodontitis are chronic diseases with a high prevalence in aging patients, and they share some of the same pathogenetic mechanisms based upon inflammation. Available evidence shows the relationship among osteoporosis, AR agents, periodontitis and implant therapy in relation to the incidence of MRONJ. Uncontrolled periodontitis may lead to tooth loss and to the need to replace teeth with dental implants. Tooth extraction and surgical dental procedures are recognized as the main risk factors for developing MRONJ in individuals taking AR therapy for osteometabolic conditions. Although the incidence of MRONJ in osteometabolic patients taking AR therapy may be as low as 0.9%, the increasing prevalence of osteoporosis and the high prevalence of periodontitis suggest that this potential complication should not be overlooked. Good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines are proposed that aim at a more integrated approach (prescriber, dentist, periodontist and dental hygienist) in the management of periodontitis patients undergoing AR therapy for osteometabolic disorders to reduce the risk of MRONJ. Dental professional and prescribers should educate patients regarding the potential risk associated with the long-term use of AR therapy and oral health behavior.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Orthopedics , Osteoporosis , Periodontitis , Traumatology , Humans , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/epidemiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Periodontitis/complications , Periodontitis/therapy , Periodontitis/chemically induced , Osteoporosis/complications , Diphosphonates/adverse effects
10.
Gen Dent ; 71(4): 72-76, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37358587

ABSTRACT

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is an uncommon and severe condition in patients who are receiving treatment with antiresorptive and/or antiangiogenic drugs, which are frequently used to treat or prevent cancer metastases. The treatment of MRONJ is challenging because the choice of a specific dental treatment depends on several factors, including the systemic condition of the patient, type and dosage of medications, and clinical and radiographic characteristics of the dental lesions. This case report describes the conservative endodontic treatment of an odontogenic infection in a patient at risk of developing MRONJ owing to bisphosphonate treatment. Endodontic retreatment was performed to control the odontogenic infection and avoid tooth extraction. Certain factors favor the use of a conservative approach, such as a localized and small infection, the absence of systemic factors (such as metabolic disorders or medications) that can impair bone healing, and good oral hygiene.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Humans , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Dental Care/adverse effects , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects
11.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 52(5): 20220352, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37192041

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic treatment outcome of non-operative management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), particularly regarding the relationship between image findings and treatment outcomes. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective observational study included patients with MRONJ who were conservatively treated between 2010 and 2020. All patients were evaluated in terms of MRONJ treatment outcomes, time to healing, and prognostic factors, including sex, age, underlying disease, antiresorptive drug type, discontinuation of antiresorptive treatment, chemotherapy, corticosteroid treatment, diabetes mellitus, location of MRONJ, clinical stage of MRONJ, and computed tomography image findings. RESULTS: The complete healing rate among the patients was 68.5%. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that "Sequestrum formation" on the internal texture (hazard ratio = 3.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-10.29; P =.014) and chemotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.95; P =.037) were significantly associated with treatment outcome. The median time to healing in patients with "Sequestrum formation" on the internal texture (4.4 months) was significantly shorter than the median time to healing in those marked with "Sclerosis" or "Normal" (35.5 months; P <.001) and "Lytic changes with sclerosis" (14.5 months; P =.015). CONCLUSIONS: The image findings on the internal texture of the lesions at the initial examination and chemotherapy were associated with the treatment outcomes of nonoperative management of MRONJ. The image findings of "Sequestrum formation" were associated with lesions taking a short time to heal and better outcomes, whereas "Sclerosis" and "Normal" were associated with lesions with longer healing times.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Humans , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Diphosphonates/adverse effects
12.
Cell Prolif ; 56(7): e13395, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36810909

ABSTRACT

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a serious complication that occurs in patients with osteoporosis or metastatic bone cancer treated with bisphosphonate. There is still no effective treatment and prevention strategy for BRONJ. Inorganic nitrate, which is abundant in green vegetables, has been reported to be protective in multiple diseases. To investigate the effects of dietary nitrate on BRONJ-like lesions in mice, we utilized a well-established mouse BRONJ model, in which tooth extraction was performed. Specifically, 4 mM sodium nitrate was administered in advance through drinking water to assess the short- and long-term effects on BRONJ. Zoledronate injection could induce severe healing inhibition of the tooth extraction socket, while addition of pretreating dietary nitrate could alleviate the inhibition by reducing monocyte necrosis and inflammatory cytokines production. Mechanistically, nitrate intake increased plasma nitric oxide levels, which attenuated necroptosis of monocytes by downregulating lipid and lipid-like molecule metabolism via a RIPK3 dependent pathway. Our findings revealed that dietary nitrate could inhibit monocyte necroptosis in BRONJ, regulate the bone immune microenvironment and promote bone remodelling after injury. This study contributes to the understanding of the immunopathogenesis of zoledronate and supports the feasibility of dietary nitrate for the clinical prevention of BRONJ.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Mice , Animals , Zoledronic Acid/pharmacology , Nitrates , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/pathology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Disease Models, Animal , Bone Remodeling , Lipids
13.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 28(4): e317-e329, 2023 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36641740

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has a frequent adverse effect after the administration of nitrogenous bisphosphonates, as non-nitrogenous bisphosphonates are metabolized more rapidly and would produce this effect to a lesser extent. The objective of this study is to analyze the results obtained in the literature with the use of L-PRF in the treatment of ONJ through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane, Web of Science and Grey Literature Database was screened from which 10 were selected. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis with full resolution, combining the use of L-PRF in the treatment of ONJ, a weighted proportion (PP) of 94.3% of complete resolution is obtained (95% CI: 91.2-97.4, p<0.001), with a low degree of heterogeneity, statistically significant (I2 = 29.02%; p<0.001). When analyzing the non-resolution data, a weighted proportion (PP) of 7.7% (95% CI: 3.6-11.9; p<0.001) was obtained with moderate heterogeneity (I2: 41.87%; p=0.112). In the meta-regression, no significant correlation was found between complete resolution and year of publication (intercept = 2.88, p=0.829). In consistency analysis no major changes in PP are identified when any of the studies are eliminated, demonstrating a high reliability in the combined results. CONCLUSION: L-PRF alone or in combination with other therapies in treatment of ONJ achieved high percentages of complete lesion resolution (94.3%). In studies where L-PRF is combined with other therapies, and where the effectiveness of the other therapy alone is analyzed, L-PRF has been shown higher percentages of resolution.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteonecrosis , Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects
14.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 81(2): 232-237, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36442534

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ) occurs in patients on antiresorptive drugs for osteoporosis with the risk with oral bisphosphonates being known to be of the order of 0.1 to 0.3% while the risk for patients on denosumab for osteoporosis is not known. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of developing ONJ in a consecutive series of patients on denosumab for osteoporosis having dental extractions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study of patients on denosumab for osteoporosis having dental extractions in the period January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2021 were compared to a control group not on antiresorptives. Detailed demographic records including length of time on antiresorptives and CTX values were obtained. Comparison to further define risk factors was made between those patients developing ONJ to those who didn't. RESULTS: The treatment group included 427 patients who were on denosumab for osteoporosis; they collectively underwent 561 episodes of dental treatment involving extractions for a total of 1081 extractions, with 10 developing ONJ (risk 2.3%). The control group consisted of 299 patients who were not taking denosumab; they collectively underwent 315 episodes of dental treatment for a total of 669 extractions, and none of them developed ONJ. There were significant differences in age and sex, but not medical comorbidities between the treatment and control groups. Within the treatment group, there were no significant differences in any of these characteristics between those who did, and those who didn't, develop ONJ. Within the treatment group, the number of extractions modified the risk of developing ONJ (odds ratio, 1.35; confidence interval, 1.1-1.7). Of the 76 patients who had extractions between 6 and 7 months after the last denosumab injection, none developed ONJ. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of ONJ in patients on denosumab for osteoporosis is a magnitude greater than for patients on the oral bisphosphonates 2.3% v 0 - 0.3%, which is 7.7 times more likely. Number of extractions and early resumption of the next dose of denosumab increases the risk of ONJ.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteonecrosis , Osteoporosis , Humans , Denosumab/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy
16.
Oral Dis ; 29(1): 75-99, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34402147

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of osteonecrosis of the jaw in bisphosphonate users submitted to dental procedures. METHODS: This systematic review searched the sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library, with no restriction on language or publication date. Reviewers, in pairs and independently, selected the studies, extracted their data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies (5391 participants) were included. The most reported bisphosphonates were zoledronate (n = 17 studies) and alendronate (n = 19) for treating cancers (n = 11) and osteoporosis (n = 16), respectively. Twelve studies were of low methodological quality. The frequency of osteonecrosis was 2.7% (95% CI: 0.9-5.2%) and proved higher for intravenous [6.9% (0.7-17.3%)] than oral [0.2% (0.9-5.2%)] bisphosphonate use. No association between longer treatment duration and greater frequency of osteonecrosis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Higher frequency of osteonecrosis was observed in intravenous bisphosphonate users submitted to dental extraction. Further studies collecting more detailed information on the bisphosphonates used and of greater methodological rigor are warranted to confirm these findings and better inform prescribers, dental surgeons, and other professionals on risks of bisphosphonate use in this patient group.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteonecrosis , Osteoporosis , Humans , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/epidemiology , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Zoledronic Acid/adverse effects , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/epidemiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy
17.
Araçatuba; s.n; 2023. 78 p. ilus, graf.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-1553304

ABSTRACT

O ozônio tem sido utilizado no processo de reparo ósseo em condições desfavoráveis, como na osteonecrose dos maxilares induzida por medicamentos (OMIM). O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a aplicação de ozonioterapia como prevenção e/ou o tratamento da OMIM. Cento e vinte ratos wistar foram distribuídos entre os grupos tratamentos: eles foram induzidos com Zoledronato e receberam ozonioterapia antes da exodontia (prevenção ­ GOP), após exodontia (tratamento ­ GOT), em ambos momentos (prevenção e tratamento ­ GOPT), um grupo não recebeu ozônio (ZOL), e outro recebeu soro fisiológico ao invés da indução (SAL). Após 14 e 28 dias pós-operatórios foram eutanasiados e as peças submetidas as análises histológicas com eosina e hematoxilina, imunoistoquímica, microtomográfica computadorizada (microCT), confocal a LASER e histomorfométrica. Em 14 dias observamos o início do reparo em GOT, assim como um epitélio presente em SAL e GOT, o mesmo ocorre em 28 dias, e uma intensa imunomarcação de osteocalcina (OC) em GOPT em 14 dias. A microCT demostrou maiores médias de BV/TV em todos grupos quando comparados a ZOL (p< 0,05), seguido pelo grupo SAL (66,039±28,379) e ZOL (60,856±28,425). Diante dos resultados pode-se observar que a ozonioterapia pode modular o reparo alveolar em animais induzidos com ácido zoledrônico(AU)


Ozone has been used in the bone repair process under unfavorable conditions, such as in druginduced osteonecrosis of the jaws (OMIM). The objective of this work was to evaluate the application of ozone therapy as prevention and/or treatment of OMIM. One hundred and twenty wistar rats were distributed among treatment groups: they were induced with Zoledronate and received ozone therapy before tooth extraction (prevention - GOP), after tooth extraction (treatment - GOT), at both times (prevention and treatment - GOPT), one group I did not receive ozone (ZOL), and another received saline instead of induction (SAL). After 14 and 28 days postoperatively, they were euthanized and the pieces submitted to histological analysis with eosin and hematoxylin, immunohistochemistry, computed microtomography (microCT), confocal LASER and histomorphometric analysis. In 14 days we observed the beginning of repair in GOT, as well as an epithelium present in SAL and GOT, the same occurs in 28 days, with intense immunostaining of osteocalcin (OC) in GOPT in 14 days. The microCT showed higher BV/TV means in all groups when compared to the ZOL (p< 0.05), followed by the SAL group (66.039±28.379) and ZOL (60.856±28.425). In view of the results, it can be observed that ozone therapy can modulate alveolar repair in animals induced with zoledronic acid(AU)


Subject(s)
Animals , Rats , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Tooth Socket , X-Ray Microtomography , Zoledronic Acid
18.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(24): 11817-11831, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38164845

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This review aims to explore the efficacy of fluorescence-guided excision in the treatment of necrotic bone and highlights the importance of fluorescence in distinguishing viable margins from necrotic ones for a more targeted and predictable management of MRONJ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 2008, to May 17, 2023. The Boolean search strategy with the following keywords "osteonecrosis" AND "fluorescence" was performed. Then, the articles were subjected to screening and eligibility phases. The papers about the use of autofluorescence-guided laser therapy in patients with jaw osteonecrosis were included. RESULTS: A total of 320 articles were initially identified through an electronic search, and ultimately, 17 papers were included in the qualitative analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that the VELscope system allows for clear visualization of the bone, making guided autofluorescence a precise, safe, and reliable technique.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Laser Therapy , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy
19.
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba ; 79(4): 379-382, 2022 12 21.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36542580

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Drug-associated Maxillary Osteonecrosis is one of the most relevant adverse effects in treatment with antiresorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates and denosumab. Oncological conditions such as multiple myeloma, breast cancer, prostate, and bone-metabolic disorders such as osteoporosis lead the indications for these antiresorptive therapies. Treatment is complex because the disease is often refractory. Pharmacological, conservative and surgical treatments are described. Objective: The aim of this study is to report two clinical cases of MRONJ treated with two different therapeutic protocols and the analysis of the available literature on these aspects based on the clinical classification defined by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS). Conclusion: Patients who develop clinical signs of great morbidity associated with MRONJ, may see their quality of life conditioned and suffer a worsening of their underlying pathology. MRONJ treatment is conditioned by the stage of the disease, its success depends on interdisciplinary management and strict medical and dental clinical follow-up, as well as rigorous monitoring to prevent or detect future recurrences early.


Introducción: La Osteonecrosis Maxilar asociada a Medicamentos (ONMAM) constituye uno de los efectos adversos más relevantes en el tratamiento con drogas antirresortivas como bifosfonatos y denosumab. Patologías oncológicas como mieloma múltiple, cáncer de mama, próstata, y alteraciones óseas-metabólicas como la osteoporosis lideran las indicaciones para estas terapias antirresortivas. El tratamiento es complejo debido a que muchas veces, la enfermedad es refractaria a la terapéutica aplicada. Se describen tratamientos farmacológicos, conservadores y quirúrgicos. Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo es reportar dos casos clínicos de ONMAM tratados con dos protocolos terapéuticos diferentes y el análisis de la literatura disponible en la actualidad sobre estos aspectos en base a la clasificación clínica definida por la American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS). Conclusión: Los pacientes que desarrollan cuadros clínicos bucales de gran morbilidad como lo es ONMAM, pueden ver condicionada su calidad de vida y sufrir un agravamiento de su patología de base. El tratamiento de ONMAM está condicionado al estadio de la enfermedad, el éxito del mismo depende del manejo interdisciplinario y de un estricto seguimiento clínico médico y odontológico, así como también un riguroso monitoreo para evitar o detectar precozmente futuras recurrencias.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteoporosis , Male , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Osteoporosis/chemically induced
20.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg ; 40(12): 777-791, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36507770

ABSTRACT

Background: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe adverse medication response that manifests as progressive bone necrosis in the craniofacial area. There is still no clear treatment protocol for the management of MRONJ. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to assess the efficacy of photobiomodulation (PBM) as an adjunct to MRONJ therapy. Methods: In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, a literature search was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Two examiners examined eligibility and risk of bias separately before extracting data. Results: Two hundred sixty-nine articles were found through electronic search, out of which only 11 met the inclusion criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis (9 retrospectives, 1 prospective, and 1 case series). A total number of 759 patients and a mean age ranging from 54 to 74 years were reviewed. Females were the most frequent gender in all of the selected studies (72% females to 28% males), and the most frequent stage in the studies mentioned above was stage II (66%). Most of the studies had shown a significant improvement when PBM was used as an adjunctive treatment. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, PBM as an adjuvant therapy can significantly improve the outcomes of each treatment plan. However, surgical intervention for the complete healing of the lesions is suggested.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Male , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Combined Modality Therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...