Spotlight on the real-world treatment of CML pts in Germany: a retrospective survey in private oncology practices.

Clinical trials in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are usually carried out in specialized centers whereas primary care for patients (pts) with CML is mainly provided by local oncology practices. The aim of this study was to assess treatment practices in pts with CML in the setting of private oncology practices in Germany. We collected data of 819 pts with a confirmed diagnosis (dx) of CML in 2013 or later from 43 practices. At dx, 84.2% (n=690) and 9.4% (n=77) of pts were in chronic or accelerated phase, 0.7% (n=6) had a blast crisis. Molecular monitoring was provided by EUTOS certified laboratories in 87.7% of pts. Typical BCR::ABL1 transcripts were detected in 86.6% (n=709). Molecular response was assessed after 2.8, 6.0, 9.4 and 12.9 m (mean) after start of treatment. Of the pts with available data, 11.1% did not achieve early molecular response and at 18 m, 83.7% had at least a major molecular response. 288 (35.2%) of pts switched to 2nd line (2L) treatment after a mean of 21.0 months. Reasons for 2L treatment were side effects in 43.4% and suboptimal response or failure in 31.4% of pts. 106 pts went on to third line (3L) treatment. 36.8 % of pts switched to and 92.8 % of pts still on 3L treatment achieved BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% at 12 m. In conclusion, in Germany pts with CML are routinely monitored by qPCR and good responses are achieved in the majority. Treatment changes are mainly due to adverse events rather than suboptimal responses.

Management and outcome of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era - analysis of the European LeukemiaNet Blast Phase Registry.

Blast phase (BP) of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) still represents an unmet clinical need with a dismal prognosis. Due to the rarity of the condition and the heterogeneity of the biology and clinical presentation, prospective trials and concise treatment recommendations are lacking. Here we present the analysis of the European LeukemiaNet Blast Phase Registry, an international collection of the clinical presentation, treatment and outcome of blast phases which had been diagnosed in CML patients after 2015. Data reveal the expected heterogeneity of the entity, lacking a clear treatment standard. Outcomes remain dismal, with a median overall survival of 23.8 months (median follow up 27.8 months). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) increases the rate of deep molecular responses. De novo BP and BP evolving from a previous CML do show slightly different features, suggesting a different biology between the two entities. Data show that outside clinical trials and in a real-world setting treatment of blast phase is individualized according to disease- and patient-related characteristics, with the aim of blast clearance prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. AlloSCT should be offered to all patients eligible for this procedure.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Version 2.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is defined by the presence of Philadelphia chromosome resulting from a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 [t9;22] that gives rise to a BCR::ABL1 fusion gene. CML occurs in 3 different phases (chronic, accelerated, and blast phase) and is usually diagnosed in the chronic phase in developed countries. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is a highly effective treatment option for patients with chronic phase-CML. The primary goal of TKI therapy in patients with chronic phase-CML is to prevent disease progression to accelerated phase-CML or blast phase-CML. Discontinuation of TKI therapy with careful monitoring is feasible in selected patients. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with chronic phase-CML.

De novo accelerated phase of chronic myeloid leukemia should be recognized even in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Overall survival of patients classified according to the European LeukemiaNet 2020 classification. Chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP), blast crisis (BC), low risk (LR), intermediate risk (IR), high risk (HR).

Long-Term Follow-Up in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Ponatinib in a Real-World Cohort: Safety and Efficacy Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI), indicated in patients with chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP), or blast phase (BP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), who are resistant or intolerant to ≥2 prior TKIs, patients for whom subsequent treatment with imatinib is not appropriate, and patients who have a T315I mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We aimed to evaluate outcomes of ponatinib treatment, including safety, with focus on cardiovascular toxicity, in real-world patients from Argentina. Data from patients with CP CML treated with ponatinib was retrospectively retrieved from 2013 to 2023 in 7 centers. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included (median age: 44 years; male: 55.5%; T315I mutation: 32%: median treatment duration: 36 months. At baseline, 57 patients (79%) had a breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (BCR::ABL1) transcript level >10% on the international reporting scale (BCR::ABL1 IS). A molecular response (MR, BCR::ABL1 (IS) <1%) was achieved at 12 months in 51.6% of evaluable patients; 57% maintained MR at last follow-up. Overall, 43% and 25% maintained major MR (MMR) or deep MR (DMR) (MR4.0-MR5.0), respectively at last follow-up. Twelve (16.6%) ponatinib-resistant patients were rescued with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 84%. Ponatinib dose was reduced during treatment in 22 patients; nevertheless, MMR was maintained in 50% of these patients. Severe arterial occlusive events (AOE) were reported in 10.9% of patients after a median treatment of 5 months. CONCLUSION: CV toxicity was consistent with clinical trials and other real-world registries. Older age, hypercholesterolemia and a SCORE risk >2% were significantly associated with higher risk of AOEs. Controlling CV risk factors and reducing doses at optimal time points may help to optimize ponatinib use in daily practice.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in children and adolescents-Clinicopathological findings.

BACKGROUND: Barely two per million Belgian children/adolescents are diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) annually. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic features, clinical and laboratory characteristics, and treatment outcome of this rare entity. METHODS: Medical records of all pediatric CML patients (age ≤ 17 years) diagnosed at the University Hospitals Leuven between 1986 and 2021 were reviewed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (median age at diagnosis 12.5 years) were included, all presenting in chronic phase. Five patients were diagnosed before 2003; main therapy included hydroxyurea (n = 5/5), interferon-alfa (n = 3/5) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-Tx) (n = 3/5). Complete hematologic response (CHR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) was reached in resp. 4/5, 4/5 and in 2/3 of evaluable patients. Three patients progressed to accelerated/blast phase (median time 19 months) and 1/5 is alive and disease-free at last follow-up. Nine patients were diagnosed after 2003 and were treated with first generation (1°G) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI): 3/9 subsequently underwent an allo-Tx, 4/9 were switched to 2°G TKI, one patient was additionally switched to 3°G TKI. CHR, CCyR and MMR was reached in 9/9, 9/9 and 8/9 of these patients. No progression to accelerated/blast phase was observed and none of these patients deceased. At last follow-up, 7/9 patients were in MMR or disease free, the two remaining patients did not reach or lost MMR, both related to compliance issues. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that TKI significantly improved the prognosis of pediatric CML. However, drug compliance poses a considerable challenge.

Incidence of blast phase in myelofibrosis patients according to anemia severity at ruxolitinib start and during therapy.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is frequently present in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), and it may be exacerbated by treatment with the JAK2-inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX). Recently, a relevant blast phase (BP) incidence has been reported in anemic MF patients unexposed to RUX. METHODS: The authors investigated the incidence of BP in 886 RUX-treated MF patients, included in the "RUX-MF" retrospective study. RESULTS: The BP incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 3.74 per 100 patient-years (3.74 %p-y). At therapy start, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3-4 anemia (hemoglobin [Hb] <8 g/dL) and severe sex/severity-adjusted anemia (Hb <8/<9 g/dL in women/men) were present in 22.5% and 25% patients, respectively. IRR of BP was 2.34 in patients with no baseline anemia and reached respectively 4.22, 4.89, and 4.93 %p-y in patients with grade 1, 2, and 3-4 anemia. Considering the sex/severity-adjusted Hb thresholds, IRR of BP was 2.85, 4.97, and 4.89 %p-y in patients with mild/no anemia, moderate, and severe anemia. Transfusion-dependent patients had the highest IRR (5.03 %p-y). Progression-free survival at 5 years was 70%, 52%, 43%, and 27% in patients with no, grade 1, 2, and 3-4 anemia, respectively (p < .001). At 6 months, 260 of 289 patients with no baseline anemia were receiving ruxolitinib, and 9.2% had developed a grade 3-4 anemia. By 6-month landmark analysis, BP-free survival was significantly worse in patients acquiring grade 3-4 anemia (69.3% vs. 88.1% at 5 years, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that anemia correlates with an increased risk of evolution into BP, both when present at baseline and when acquired during RUX monotherapy. Innovative anemia therapies and disease-modifying agents are warranted in these patients.

Accelerated-phase CML: de novo and transformed.

Despite the dramatic improvements in outcomes for the majority of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients over the past 2 decades, a similar improvement has not been observed in the more advanced stages of the disease. Blast phase CML (BP-CML), although infrequent, remains poorly understood and inadequately treated. Consequently, the key initial goal of therapy in a newly diagnosed patient with chronic phase CML continues to be prevention of disease progression. Advances in genomic investigation in CML, specifically related to BP-CML, clearly demonstrate we have only scratched the surface in our understanding of the disease biology, a prerequisite to devising more targeted and effective therapeutic approaches to prevention and treatment. Importantly, the introduction of the concept of "CML-like" acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has the potential to simplify the differentiation between BCR::ABL1-positive ALL from de novo lymphoid BP-CML, optimizing monitoring and therapeutics. The development of novel treatment strategies such as the MATCHPOINT approach for BP-CML, utilizing combination chemotherapy with fludarabine, cytarabine, and idarubicin in addition to dose-modified ponatinib, may also be an important step in improving treatment outcomes. However, identifying patients who are high risk of transformation remains a challenge, and the recent 2022 updates to the international guidelines may add further confusion to this area. Further work is required to clarify the identification and treatment strategy for the patients who require a more aggressive approach than standard chronic phase CML management.

Acquired Factor VII Deficiency Associated With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Blast Crisis.

Factor VII (FVII) is an important, vitamin K-dependent clotting factor. Acquired FVII deficiency is a rare entity that is associated with serious bleeding complications. We report a case of acquired FVII deficiency in a patient with recurrent chronic myeloid leukemia in blast crisis who developed bilateral retinal hemorrhages. The coagulopathy was corrected with the initiation of chemotherapy and subsequent reduction in peripheral blast count.

Targeting FLT3-TAZ signaling to suppress drug resistance in blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Although the development of BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) rendered chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) a manageable condition, acquisition of drug resistance during blast phase (BP) progression remains a critical challenge. Here, we reposition FLT3, one of the most frequently mutated drivers of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target of BP-CML. METHODS: We generated FLT3 expressing BCR::ABL1 TKI-resistant CML cells and enrolled phase-specific CML patient cohort to obtain unpaired and paired serial specimens and verify the role of FLT3 signaling in BP-CML patients. We performed multi-omics approaches in animal and patient studies to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of FLT3 as a viable target of BP-CML by establishing the (1) molecular mechanisms of FLT3-driven drug resistance, (2) diagnostic methods of FLT3 protein expression and localization, (3) association between FLT3 signaling and CML prognosis, and (4) therapeutic strategies to tackle FLT3+ CML patients. RESULTS: We reposition the significance of FLT3 in the acquisition of drug resistance in BP-CML, thereby, newly classify a FLT3+ BP-CML subgroup. Mechanistically, FLT3 expression in CML cells activated the FLT3-JAK-STAT3-TAZ-TEAD-CD36 signaling pathway, which conferred resistance to a wide range of BCR::ABL1 TKIs that was independent of recurrent BCR::ABL1 mutations. Notably, FLT3+ BP-CML patients had significantly less favorable prognosis than FLT3- patients. Remarkably, we demonstrate that repurposing FLT3 inhibitors combined with BCR::ABL1 targeted therapies or the single treatment with ponatinib alone can overcome drug resistance and promote BP-CML cell death in patient-derived FLT3+ BCR::ABL1 cells and mouse xenograft models. CONCLUSION: Here, we reposition FLT3 as a critical determinant of CML progression via FLT3-JAK-STAT3-TAZ-TEAD-CD36 signaling pathway that promotes TKI resistance and predicts worse prognosis in BP-CML patients. Our findings open novel therapeutic opportunities that exploit the undescribed link between distinct types of malignancies.

Genomic alterations in blast phase of BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.

The blast phase of BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-BP) represents the final stage of the disease, which is complicated by complex genomic alterations. These alterations result from sequence changes in genetic material (DNA, RNA) and can lead to either a gain or loss of function of encoded proteins, such as adaptor proteins, enzymes, components of spliceosomes, cell cycle checkpoints regulators, transcription factors, or proteins in cell signaling pathways. Interference at various levels, including transcription, translation, and post-translational modification (such as methylation, dephosphorylation, or acetylation), can contribute to these alterations. Mutated genes such as ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1, IDH2, TET2, SRSF2, U2AF1, TP53, NRAS, KRAS, PTPN11, SH2B3/LNK, and RUNX1 play active roles at different stages of genetic material expression, modification, and protein function manipulation in MPNs. These mutations are also correlated with, and can contribute to, the progression of MPN-BP. In this review, we summarize their common mutational profiles, functions, and associations with progression of MPN-BP.

Deciphering Potential Molecular Signatures to Differentiate Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with BCR::ABL1 from Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Blast Crisis.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with BCR::ABL1 has recently been recognized as a distinct subtype in international classifications. Distinguishing it from myeloid blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (BC-CML) without evidence of a chronic phase (CP), remains challenging. We aimed to better characterize this entity by integrating clonal architecture analysis, mutational landscape assessment, and gene expression profiling. We analyzed a large retrospective cohort study including CML and AML patients. Two AML patients harboring a BCR::ABL1 fusion were included in the study. We identified BCR::ABL1 fusion as a primary event in one patient and a secondary one in the other. AML-specific variants were identified in both. Real-time RT-PCR experiments demonstrated that CD25 mRNA is overexpressed in advanced-phase CML compared to AML. Unsupervised principal component analysis showed that AML harboring a BCR::ABL1 fusion was clustered within AML. An AML vs. myeloid BC-CML differential expression signature was highlighted, and while ID4 (inhibitor of DNA binding 4) mRNA appears undetectable in most myeloid BC-CML samples, low levels are detected in AML samples. Therefore, CD25 and ID4 mRNA expression might differentiate AML with BCR::ABL1 from BC-CML and assign it to the AML group. A method for identifying this new WHO entity is then proposed. Finally, the hypothesis of AML with BCR::ABL1 arising from driver mutations on a BCR::ABL1 background behaving as a clonal hematopoiesis mutation is discussed. Validation of our data in larger cohorts and basic research are needed to better understand the molecular and cellular aspects of AML with a BCR::ABL1 entity.

A rare BCR-ABL1 transcript in chronic myeloid leukemia: Case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to enhance our scientific understanding of the clinicopathologic features of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with the e12a3 transcript and to provide insights into potential treatment options for this rare subtype of CML. CASE SUMMARY: We present the case of a 21-year-old Chinese male patient who was diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with the e12a3 transcript. Biopsy of his left iliac soft tissue mass indicated that he was in the blast crisis phase of CML. The patient was treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) drugs and achieved remission, but relapsed soon after. Despite receiving prognostic chemotherapy, the disease progressed and eventually led to the patient's death. CONCLUSION: To avoid missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis, it is recommended to conduct a thorough clinical evaluation and actively identify the underlying etiology.