Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 73
Filter
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(11): e25152, 2021 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33726000

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Noninvasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring may be clinically useful in patients who require continuous blood pressure monitoring in situations where arterial catheter placement is limited. Many previous studies on the accuracy of the noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitoring method reported various results. However, there is no research on the effectiveness of noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring during one-lung ventilation. The purpose of this study was to compare arterial blood pressure obtained through invasive method and noninvasive method by using ClearSight during one-lung ventilation.In this retrospective observational study, a total of 26 patients undergoing one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery at a single institution between March and July 2019 were recruited. All patients in this study were cannulated on their radial artery to measure continuously invasive blood pressures and applied ClearSight on the ipsilateral side of the cannulated arm. We compared and analyzed the agreement and trendability of blood pressure recorded with invasive and noninvasive methods during one-lung ventilation.Blood pressure and pulse rate showed a narrower limit of agreement with a percentage error value of around 30%. In addition, the tracking ability of each measurement could be determined by the concordance rate, all of which were below acceptable limits (92%).In noninvasive arterial blood pressure monitoring using ClearSight, mean blood pressure and pulse rate show acceptable agreement with the invasive method.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Monitoring, Intraoperative/instrumentation , One-Lung Ventilation , Thoracic Surgical Procedures , Aged , Arterial Pressure , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Radial Artery/physiopathology , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
2.
Res Vet Sci ; 135: 162-166, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33524826

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the agreement between oscillometric and direct blood pressure monitors in anesthetized dogs and evaluated the ability of the oscillometric method to detect MAP <60 mmHg. Forty client-owned dogs, three months to 14 years old, 4.6-50.2 kg, under general anesthesia were studied. Systolic (SAP), mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressures were measured directly via an arterial catheter and with an oscillometric cuff (Cardell Touch monitor). Paired values were compared with mixed effect models. Bias and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated. The sensitivity and false negative rate to detect hypotension (invasive MAP <60 mmHg) using an oscillometric MAP <60 and < 70 mmHg were calculated. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was constructed and the area under the curve calculated. SAP and DAP differed between methods (both P < 0.001), but MAP did not (P = 0.5). Bland-Altman plots showed small biases but wide LOA for all variables. The sensitivity to detect hypotension was 40% with a false negative rate of 60% when using an oscillometric MAP <60 mmHg, and 68% and 32%, respectively, with a MAP <70 mmHg. The area under the ROC curve for MAP was 0.82. While the oscillometric MAP did not differ from invasive values, the device failed to recognize hypotensive events when 60 mmHg was used as the threshold to detect hypotension. Higher MAP values increased the ability to correctly recognize hypotension, but at the expense of a higher incidence of false positives.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/veterinary , Blood Pressure Monitors/veterinary , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Hypotension/veterinary , Oscillometry/veterinary , Animals , Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Dogs , Female , Hypotension/diagnosis , Male , Oscillometry/instrumentation
3.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 22(10): 1754-1756, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32882074

ABSTRACT

Detection, diagnosis, and treatment of hypertension require accurate blood pressure assessment. However, in clinical practice, lack of training in or nonadherence to measurement recommendations, lack of patient preparation, unsuitable environments where blood pressure is measured, and inaccurate and inappropriate equipment are widespread and commonly lead to inaccurate blood pressure readings. This has led to calls to require regular training and certification for people assessing blood pressure. Hence, the Pan American Health Organization in collaboration with Resolve to Save Lives, the World Hypertension League, Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group, and Hypertension Canada has developed a free brief training and certification course in blood pressure measurement. The course is available at www. The release of the online certification course is timed to help support World Hypertension Day. This year World Hypertension Day has been delayed to October 17 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For 2020, the World Hypertension League calls on all health care professionals, health care professional organizations, and indeed all of society, to assess the blood pressure of all adults, measure blood pressure accurately, and achieve blood pressure control in those with hypertension.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Education, Distance/methods , Hypertension/diagnosis , Adult , Blood Pressure/physiology , Blood Pressure Monitors/trends , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Certification , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
4.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 7(10): e14926, 2019 10 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31670694

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stroke, as a leading cause of death around the globe, has become a heavy burden on our society. Studies show that stroke can be predicted and prevented if a person's blood pressure (BP) status is appropriately monitored via an ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) system. However, currently there exists no efficient and user-friendly ABPM system to provide early warning for stroke risk in real-time. Moreover, most existing ABPM devices measure BP during the deflation of the cuff, which fails to reflect blood pressure accurately. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we sought to develop a new ABPM mobile health (mHealth) system that was capable of monitoring blood pressure during inflation and could detect early stroke-risk signals in real-time. METHODS: We designed an ABPM mHealth system that is based on mobile network infrastructure and mobile apps. The proposed system contains two major parts: a new ABPM device in which an inflation-type BP measurement algorithm is embedded, and an abnormal blood pressure data analysis algorithm for stroke-risk prediction services at our health data service center. For evaluation, the ABPM device was first tested using simulated signals and compared with the gold standard of a mercury sphygmomanometer. Then, the performance of our proposed mHealth system was evaluated in an observational study. RESULTS: The results are presented in two main parts: the device test and the longitudinal observational studies of the presented system. The average measurement error of the new ABPM device with the inflation-type algorithm was less than 0.55 mmHg compared to a reference device using simulated signals. Moreover, the results of correlation coefficients and agreement analyses show that there is a strong linear correlation between our device and the standard mercury sphygmomanometer. In the case of the system observational study, we collected a data set with 88 features, including real-time data, user information, and user records. Our abnormal blood pressure data analysis algorithm achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve of 0.904 for the low risk level, 0.756 for the caution risk level, and 0.912 for the high-risk level. Our system enables a patient to be aware of their risk in real-time, which improves medication adherence with risk self-management. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this device is the first ABPM device that measures blood pressure during the inflation process and has obtained a government medical license. Device tests and longitudinal observational studies were conducted in Peking University hospitals, and they showed the device's high accuracy for BP measurements, its efficiency in detecting early signs of stroke, and its efficiency at providing an early warning for stroke risk.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Monitors/standards , Early Diagnosis , Stroke/prevention & control , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Blood Pressure Determination/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/physiopathology , Longitudinal Studies , Risk Factors , Stroke/physiopathology
6.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 21(4): 463-469, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30609129

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the performance of the Omron HEM-9600T, an automatic wrist-type device for self BP measurement, in the sitting position with the wrist at heart level and supine position according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2:2013 guidelines. In the supine position, we evaluated the device under 3 different conditions: using the supine with sideways palm position, the supine with upwards palm position, and the supine with downwards palm position. After 106 subjects were screened and 21 subjects were excluded, the same 85 subjects (38 men [44.7%] and 47 women [55.3%]) were included in the analyses for each position. The average age of the subjects was 54.5 ± 12.2 years (mean ± SD). The mean wrist circumference was 17.0 ± 2.4 cm. The wrist size distribution fulfilled the requirements of the guidelines. The mean differences between reference BPs and HEM-9600T readings were 1.0 ± 6.7/1.4 ± 5.7 mm Hg, 6.6 ± 7.2/5.5 ± 6.0 mm Hg, 4.8 ± 7.2/4.9 ± 5.8 mm Hg, and 2.1 ± 7.2/2.8 ± 6.8 mm Hg for SBP/DBP in the sitting position, supine with sideways palm position, supine with upwards palm position, and supine with downwards palm position, respectively. In conclusion, the Omron HEM-9600T in the sitting position fulfilled the validation criteria of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2:2013 guidelines. On the other hand, the accuracies of HEM-9600T in the supine position differed depending on the positioning of the palm, with only the downwards palm-position measurement fulfilling both validation criteria of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2:2013 guidelines.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Supine Position/physiology , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Monitors/trends , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Equipment Design , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sitting Position , Wrist/anatomy & histology , Wrist/physiology
7.
PLoS One ; 13(8): e0201123, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080862

ABSTRACT

We present a robust method for testing and calibrating the performance of oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitors, using an industry standard NIBP simulator to determine the characteristic ratios used, and to explore differences between different devices. Assuming that classical auscultatory sphygmomanometry provides the best approximation to intra-arterial pressure, the results obtained from oscillometric measurements for a range of characteristic ratios are compared against a modified auscultatory method to determine an optimum characteristic ratio, Rs for systolic blood pressure (SBP), which was found to be 0.565. We demonstrate that whilst three Chinese manufactured NIBP monitors we tested used the conventional maximum amplitude algorithm (MAA) with characteristic ratios Rs = 0.4624±0.0303 (Mean±SD) and Rd = 0.6275±0.0222, another three devices manufactured in Germany and Japan either do not implement this standard protocol or used different characteristic ratios. Using a reference database of 304 records from 102 patients, containing both the Korotkoff sounds and the oscillometric waveforms, we showed that none of the devices tested used the optimal value of 0.565 for the characteristic ratio Rs, and as a result, three of the devices tested would underestimate systolic pressure by an average of 4.8mmHg, and three would overestimate the systolic pressure by an average of 6.2 mmHg.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitors , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Blood Pressure , Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Determination/standards , Blood Pressure Determination/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Monitors/standards , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Calibration , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oscillometry/instrumentation , Oscillometry/standards , Oscillometry/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
8.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 32(4): 717-727, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28980101

ABSTRACT

The accurate, non-invasive, measuring of the continuous arterial blood pressure waveform faces some difficulties and an innovative blood pressure measurement technology is urgently needed. However, the arterial blood pressure waveform plays an essential role in health care by providing diagnostic information and base for calculating several heart function parameters. The aim of this study is to introduce a novel non-invasive measuring system that can measure the arterial blood pressure waveform with high accuracy in comparison to an applanation tonometry system. The applied measuring device utilizes a new measurement strategy enabled by the OptoForce 3D force sensor, which is attached to the wrist at the radial artery. To validate the accuracy, 30 simultaneous measurements were taken with a Millar tonometer. For the simultaneously recorded non-invasive signals, the similarity was high (the average correlation was [Formula: see text]). The differences in the systolic and the diastolic blood pressure measured by the two systems are small. The average differences ([Formula: see text]) for simultaneously recorded systolic, diastolic, mean arterial and incisura pressures were: [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. These results satisfy the AAMI criteria. Based on our results, this new system requires further development and validation against invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in order to prove its usefulness in patient monitoring, emergency care, and pulse diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Hemodynamic Monitoring/methods , Manometry/methods , Adult , Blood Pressure , Blood Pressure Determination/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Design , Female , Hemodynamic Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Manometry/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Wavelet Analysis , Young Adult
9.
Methods Inf Med ; 54(5): 388-97, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26395147

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular diseases are the most frequent cause of death in industrialized countries. Non-adherence with prescribed medication and recommended lifestyle changes significantly increases the risk of major cardiovascular events. The telemonitoring programme MyCor (Myokardinfarkt und Koronarstent Programm in Tirol) is a multi-modal intervention programme to improve lifestyle and medication management of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). It includes patient education, self-monitoring with goal-setting and feedback, and regular clinical visits. We evaluated the MyCor telemonitoring programme regarding technical feasibility, user acceptance, patient adherence, change in health status, and change in quality of life. METHODS: A 4½-month study was conducted with two telemonitoring phases and one interim phase. The study comprised patient surveys, standardized assessment of quality of life using the MacNew questionnaire at study entry and after 4 and 18 weeks, analysis of adherence to medication and physical activity during the two telemonitoring phases, and analysis of reached goals regarding health conditions during the telemonitoring phases. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (mean age: 63 years) participated in the study. Patients showed a high acceptance of the MyCor telemonitoring programme. Patients reported feelings of self-control, motivation for lifestyle changes, and improved quality of life. Adherence to daily measurements was high with 86% and 77% in the two telemonitoring phases. Adherence to medication was also high with up to 87% and 80%. Pre-defined goals for physical activity were reached in up to 86% and 73% of days, respectively. Quality of life improved from 5.5 at study entry to 6.3 at the end (p< 0.01; MacNew questionnaire). Reductions in blood pressure and heart rate or an improvement in reaching defined goals could not be observed. CONCLUSIONS: The MyCor telemonitoring programme Tirol for CHD patients has a high rate of acceptance among included patients. Critical evaluation revealed subjective benefits regarding quality of life and health status as well as high adherence rates to medication and lifestyle changes. Achieving long-term adherence and verifying clinical outcomes, however, remains an open issue. Our findings will promote further studies, addressing different strategies for an optimal mix of patient education, telemonitoring, feedback, and clinical follow-ups.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Disease/therapy , Monitoring, Ambulatory/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Computer-Assisted Instruction/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Exercise Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mobile Applications , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Quality of Life , Reminder Systems/statistics & numerical data , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Smartphone/statistics & numerical data
10.
Methods Inf Med ; 53(4): 286-90, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25077755

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This article is part of the Focus Theme of Methods of Information in Medicine on "Biosignal Interpretation: Advanced Methods for Studying Cardiovascular and Respiratory Systems". BACKGROUND: Hypertensive pregnancy disorders affect 6 - 8 percent of all pregnancies and can result in severe complications for both the mother and the fetus. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to improve risk stratification of pregnant women suffering from hypertension and pre-eclampsia (PE) by applying bivariate Segmented Poincaré plot analysis (BSPPA). METHODS: From 35 pregnant women suffering from chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension and PE, 30 minutes of noninvasive systolic blood pressure and beat- to-beat intervals were continuously recorded and analyzed by applying BSPPA to quantify their couplings. RESULTS: We revealed significant different couplings between chronic hypertension (CH), gestational hypertension and PE, indicating that cardiovascular regulation can be considerably altered depending on the type of hypertensive disorder. The optimal multivariate set of two BSPPA indices was determined which distinguish best between CH and PE. It achieved a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 77.8% and an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 90.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The BSPPA method a) provides improved risk stratification for pregnant women suffering from hypertension and PE, b) increases the ability to diagnose pathological changes, and c) could contribute substantially to the differential diagnosis of hypertensive pregnancy disorders.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure/physiology , Electrocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Heart Rate/physiology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/diagnosis , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Adult , Computer Graphics , Female , Humans , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/physiopathology , Pre-Eclampsia/physiopathology , Pregnancy , Young Adult
11.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 62(3): 200-3, 2013 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23752137

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The objective of this investigation is to describe the characteristics of subjects with a self-measurement device, representative of the French population. METHODS: Auto four-page questionnaire administered by mail to 4500 individuals aged 35 years and over. RESULTS: Three thousand four hundred and sixty-two subjects aged 56 years responded to the questionnaire: 1054 subjects were treated hypertensives with a mean age 65.9 years and 2388 were untreated. Among treated subjects, 41% have one self-measurement blood pressure device (36% in 2010), 15% use one humeral device and 26% wrist device. Only 2% of treated hypertensive patients measure their blood pressure before a medical consultation, one times occasionally 49%, 11% several times a week, and 4% every day! Among 569 subjects owners of self-measure, 61% are treated hypertensive, 26% normotensive and 13% untreated hypertensive patients. Treated hypertensives are controlled with self-measurement in 50% of cases (BP<135 and 85 mmHg) (49% in 2010) CONCLUSIONS: In 2012, seven million of self-measurement devices are used in France, four million in treated hypertensives. Only 2% of hypertensive patients with self-measurement device use it correctly. Better education for hypertensive subjects is required. Control in hypertensive stagnated at 50%, incite to improve our therapeutic strategy, favoring pluritherapies.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Monitors , Blood Pressure , Hypertension/prevention & control , Self Care/instrumentation , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Design , Female , France , Health Surveys , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 60(3): 449-62, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22521624

ABSTRACT

Blood pressure traditionally has been measured in the clinic setting using the auscultatory method and a mercury sphygmomanometer. Technologic advances have led to improvements in measuring clinic blood pressure and allowed for measuring blood pressures outside the clinic. This review outlines various methods for evaluating blood pressure and the clinical utility of each type of measurement. Home blood pressures and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures have improved our ability to evaluate the risk of target-organ damage and hypertension-related morbidity and mortality. Measuring home blood pressures may lead to more active participation in health care by patients and has the potential to improve blood pressure control. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring enables measuring nighttime blood pressures and diurnal changes, which may be the most accurate predictors of risk associated with elevated blood pressure. Additionally, reducing nighttime blood pressure is feasible and may be an important component of effective antihypertensive therapy. Finally, estimating central aortic pressures and pulse wave velocity are 2 of the newer methods for assessing blood pressure and hypertension-related target-organ damage.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Hypertension/diagnosis , Self Care , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Circadian Rhythm , Female , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Male , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/etiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity
13.
Trop Doct ; 42(2): 101-3, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22431828

ABSTRACT

Regular blood pressure (BP) monitoring is a cost-effective means of early identification and management of hypertensive disease in pregnancy. In much of rural sub-Saharan Africa, the ability to take and act on accurate BP measurements is lacking as a result of poorly functioning or absent equipment and/or inadequate staff education. This study describes the feasibility of using validated automated BP devices suitable for low-resource settings (LRS) in primary health-care facilities in rural Tanzania. Following a primary survey, 19 BP devices were distributed to 11 clinics and re-assessed at one, three, six, 12 and 36 months. Devices were used frequently with high levels of user satisfaction and good durability. We conclude that the use of automated BP devices in LRS is feasible and sustainable. An assessment of their ability to reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality is vital.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Automation , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Hypertension/diagnosis , Poverty , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/diagnosis , Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Monitors/supply & distribution , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Resources , Humans , Pregnancy , Primary Health Care , Rural Population , Tanzania
14.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 24(3): 191-202, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20532593

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Non-invasive blood pressure recordings may be inaccurate in the critically ill patient and measurement difficulties are intensified in the prehospital setting. This may adversely impact upon outcomes for many critically ill patients, particularly those with traumatic brain injury and/or lengthy prehospital times. This study aimed to validate a non-invasive, oscillometric, ambulatory blood pressure measuring device, the Oscar 2, Model 222 (SunTech Medical, Morrisville, USA) during the ambulance transport of critically ill patients. METHODS: We have previously shown that mean arterial blood pressures observed by Intensive Care Unit nurses from a patient monitor can be considered interchangeable with reference intra-arterial integrated mean pressures. In the current study, we compared non-invasive device mean pressures to intra-arterial pressures observed by retrieval nurses from the patient monitor, during the ambulance transportation of critically ill patients. Device performance was required to fulfil the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) protocol requirements. Additionally, linear mixed effects analyses and Bland-Altman comparisons were undertaken. RESULTS: For 157 measurements recorded from 23 patients, when the Oscar 2 did not indicate a measurement was associated with a fault, the device fulfilled the AAMI protocol requirements, with a mean error of -1.1 mmHg (standard deviation 7.8 mmHg), 95% confidence intervals (linear mixed effects analysis) -2.9, 0.8; P = 0.26. Bland-Altman plots indicated uniform agreement across a wide range of blood pressures. Sixteen percent of recordings were associated with a patient, environment, or device generated fault. CONCLUSIONS: When the Oscar 2 does not indicate a fault has occurred, clinicians may be confident the mean pressure, within acceptable limits, is accurate, even during ambulance motion, administration of high doses of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation. The Oscar 2 appears to be an accurate and rugged out-of-hospital device.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Critical Care , Critical Illness , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulances , Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Determination/statistics & numerical data , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , South Australia , Young Adult
15.
J Perinatol ; 29(11): 744-9, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19609309

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference between noninvasive and central arterial blood pressure measurements in extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of infants with birth weight

Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight , Cohort Studies , Diastole , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Oscillometry/instrumentation , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Systole , Transducers, Pressure , Umbilical Arteries
16.
Blood Press Monit ; 13(4): 187-91, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18635972

ABSTRACT

Protocols to determine the accuracy of noninvasive blood pressure monitors have been published by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, the British Hypertension Society, and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). We compared the statistical basis for each of these protocols. Although the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and British Hypertension Society protocols require a minimum of 85 participants, the ESH protocol requires only 33 participants. The reduced sample size results in a reduction in statistical power from 98 to 70%, which brings into question the applicability of the ESH (International) protocol.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/standards , Blood Pressure Monitors/standards , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Hypertension , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Societies, Medical , United Kingdom
17.
J Biopharm Stat ; 17(4): 697-719, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17613649

ABSTRACT

Evaluating agreement between measurement methods or between observers is important in method comparison studies and in reliability studies. Often we are interested in whether a new method can replace an existing invasive or expensive method, or whether multiple methods or multiple observers can be used interchangeably. Ideally, interchangeability is established only if individual measurements from different methods are similar to replicated measurements from the same method. This is the concept of individual equivalence. Interchangeability between methods is similar to bioequivalence between drugs in bioequivalence studies. Following the FDA guidelines on individual bioequivalence, we propose to assess individual agreement among multiple methods via individual equivalence using the moment criteria. In the case where there is a reference method, we extend the individual bioequivalence criteria to individual equivalence criteria and propose to use individual equivalence coefficient (IEC) to compare multiple methods to one or multiple references. In the case where there is no reference method available, we propose a new IEC to assess individual agreement between multiple methods. Furthermore, we propose a coefficient of individual agreement (CIA) that links the IEC with two recent agreement indices. A method of moments is used for estimation, where one can utilize output from ANOVA models. The nonparametric and bootstrap approaches are used for inference. Five examples are used for illustration.


Subject(s)
Biometry/methods , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Algorithms , Analysis of Variance , Arthrometry, Articular/methods , Arthrometry, Articular/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Blood Pressure Determination/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Carotid Stenosis/diagnosis , Confidence Intervals , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Knee/anatomy & histology , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Observer Variation , Radiography/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics, Nonparametric
18.
J Biopharm Stat ; 17(4): 721-38, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17613650

ABSTRACT

In method comparison and reliability studies, it is often important to assess agreement between multiple measurements made by different methods, devices, laboratories, observers, or instruments. For continuous data, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) is a popular index for assessing agreement between multiple methods on the same subject where none of the methods is treated as reference. Barnhart et al. (2007) proposed coefficient of individual agreement (CIA) to assess individual agreement between multiple methods for situations with and without a reference method extending the concept of individual bioe-quivalence from the FDA 2001 guidelines. In this paper, we propose a new CCC for assessing agreement between multiple methods where one of the methods is treated as reference. We compare the properties of the CCC and CIA and their dependency on the relative magnitude of between-subject variability and within-subject variability. The relationship between CCC and CIA as well as the impact of between-subject variability are presented algebraically and graphically. Several examples are presented to explain the interpretation of the CCC and CIA values.


Subject(s)
Biometry/methods , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Algorithms , Analysis of Variance , Arthrometry, Articular/methods , Arthrometry, Articular/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Blood Pressure Determination/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Carotid Stenosis/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Knee/anatomy & histology , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Observer Variation , Radiography/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results
20.
Med Decis Making ; 26(6): 624-32, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17099201

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The clinical diagnosis of hypertension is subject to misclassification, and this may be clinically important. This article calculates positive and negative predictive values for blood pressure measurement and assesses the frequency of clinically important blood pressure misclassification. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A modeling study was carried out on 4763 adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) POPULATION: True treatment eligibility was determined by applying Joint National Committee (JNC) VII criteria to individuals in the study population. Each individual was also allocated a series of blood pressures incorporating an error term reflecting day-to-day measurement variation. Test positives are persons classified as needing treatment on the basis of the mean of 2 blood pressure measurements. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Positive predictive values of a diagnosis of hypertension based on 2 measurements were calculated for each age-sex group. Low-risk false positives and highrisk false negatives were categorized as clinically important errors. Positive predictive values are high in persons older than age 65. In persons ages 16 to 34, the positive predictive value is 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.32) in men and 0.16 (95% CI: 0.06-0.26) in women. Persons younger than age 35 are almost always at low risk of cardiovascular disease, and therefore this misclassification is clinically important. Even with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement, positive predictive values in young adults are under 0.5. CONCLUSIONS: Blood pressure estimation is a poor diagnostic test in low-prevalence populations such as young adults. Estimation of blood pressure should be informed by prior estimation of cardiovascular risk.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Hypertension/classification , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Pressure Monitors/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...