Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 16.797
Filter
1.
Br Dent J ; 236(9): 683-687, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730156

ABSTRACT

The continuation of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) in patients with established medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a common concern among dentists and oncologists. There is little evidence supporting or refuting the continued use of BMAs or drug holidays and their impact on established MRONJ. This paper evaluates the outcome of continued BMAs use on the patient's MRONJ status. A retrospective review of 29 oncology patients undergoing active cancer care for either metastatic disease or multiple myeloma was conducted. Data on demographics, oncological status, BMA history and MRONJ status were collected. In total, 90% of patients were judged to have healed or stable MRONJ while continuing BMAs. Most patients (69%) continued the same BMA regime (three- or four-weekly) that they were on before developing MRONJ. The average number of BMAs doses received after an MRONJ diagnosis was 12 (range 1-48). Three patients (10.3%) were found to have MRONJ progression, with two patients developing new sites of necrosis. This real-world dataset suggests that the majority of MRONJ cases remain stable and will not worsen with the continuation of BMAs.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy
2.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 547, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730315

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antiresorptive therapy (AR) disrupts osseous homeostasis and can induce direct irritation over the gastrointestinal mucosa; however, its possible erosive effects on the oral epithelium have not been totally described. Among the most frequent oral erosive lesions, oral lichen planus (OLP) frequently presents as painful mucosal ulcerations, arising from basal membrane inflammatory damage. Thus, the aim of this retrospective study was to describe the association between AR and the incidence of OLP. METHODS: This case-control study included data from 148 patients (17 patients undergoing AR therapy (AR group) / 131 without AR therapy (Control group)). Each patient record was systematically processed and the association between AR drugs and OLP clinical characteristics within both groups was assessed. RESULTS: The erosive form of OLP was significantly more frequent in the AR group than in the Control group (p = 0.029). Indeed, the AR treatment using alendronic acid (41.2%) was the most frequently reported. Additionally, the erosive form of OLP showed the strongest association with pain and burning sensation among the OLP types (p < 0.050). However, disease worsening and AR consumption were not significantly associated (p = 0.150). CONCLUSIONS: Patients under AR therapy show more clinical symptoms associated to the erosive type of OLP. Regardless of the AR therapy, the erosive type of OLP is associated with more severe symptoms.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Lichen Planus, Oral , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Case-Control Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Prevalence , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Alendronate/therapeutic use , Alendronate/adverse effects
3.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 395, 2024 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702593

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Germany, geriatricians deliver acute geriatric care during acute hospital stay and post-acute rehabilitation after transfer to a rehabilitation clinic. The rate patients receive acute geriatric care (AGC) or are transferred to post-acute rehabilitation (TPR) differs between hospitals. This study analyses the association between the two geriatric treatment systems (AGC, TPR) and second hip fracture in patients following an index hip fracture. METHODS: Nationwide health insurance data are used to identify the rate of AGC and TPR per hospital following hip fracture surgery in patients aged ≥ 80 years. Outcomes are a second hip fracture after surgery or after discharge within 180 or 360 days and new specific anti-osteoporotic drugs. Cox proportional hazard models and generalised linear models are applied. RESULTS: Data from 29,096 hip fracture patients from 652 hospitals were analysed. AGC and TPR are not associated with second hip fracture when follow-up started after surgery. However, during the first months after discharge patients from hospitals with no AGC or low rates of TPR have higher rates of second hip fracture than patients from hospitals with high rates of AGC or high rates of TPR (Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 1.35 (1.01-1.80) or 1.35 (1.03-1.79), respectively). Lower rates of AGC are associated with lower probabilities of new prescriptions of specific anti-osteoporotic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests beneficial relationships of geriatric treatment after hip fracture with a) the risk of second hip fractures during the first months after discharge and b) an improvement of anti-osteoporotic drug treatment.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Hip Fractures , Humans , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/surgery , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Male , Retrospective Studies , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Aged
4.
Arch Esp Urol ; 77(3): 242-248, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715164

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyse the effects of cinobufotalin capsule combined with zoledronic acid on pain symptoms and clinical efficacy of prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. METHODS: Patients with prostate cancer with bone metastasis admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected as study subjects. They were divided into the control group (treated with zoledronic acid) and the combined group (cinobufotalin capsules were added on the control group basis) according to different recorded treatment methods. The efficacies of the two groups after matching, lumbar L1-4 bone mineral density (BMD), serum calcium, serum phosphorus, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score before and after treatment were compared, and adverse reactions were statistically analysed. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included in the study, encompassing 52 patients in the combined group and 50 patients in the control group. After 1:1 preference score matching, 64 patients were included in the two groups. No significant difference in baseline data was found between the two groups (p > 0.05). The total effective rate of the combination group was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). No significant differences in L1-4 bone mineral density, serum calcium and phosphorus, VAS score and KPS score were observed between the two groups prior to treatment (p > 0.05). After treatment, the L1-4 bone mineral density (BMD) and KPS score of the combined group decreased to less than those of the control group, the VAS score was lower than that of the control group, and the serum calcium and phosphorus level increased but less than that of the control group (p < 0.05). No significant difference in adverse reactions was found between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cinobufotalin capsule combined with zoledronic acid had ideal efficacy in the treatment of prostate cancer in patients with bone metastasis. This approach could improve their bone density and quality of life, improve their calcium and phosphorus metabolism, reduce their pain symptoms and provide increased safety. It may have an important guiding role in formulating future clinical treatment plans for patients with prostate cancer and bone metastasis.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Bone Neoplasms , Bufanolides , Prostatic Neoplasms , Zoledronic Acid , Humans , Male , Zoledronic Acid/therapeutic use , Zoledronic Acid/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/complications , Bufanolides/therapeutic use , Bufanolides/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Capsules , Drug Therapy, Combination , Cancer Pain/drug therapy
5.
Addict Sci Clin Pract ; 19(1): 34, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693547

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Zoledronate, a bisphosphonate, is a potent first-line treatment for osteoporosis. It is also a preferred treatment for hypercalcemia especially when unresponsive to intravenous fluids. Bisphosphonates can cause acute phase reactions that mimic opioid withdrawal symptoms, which can confound provider decision-making. Our case highlights cognitive bias involving a patient with opioid use disorder who received zoledronate for hypercalcemia secondary to immobilization and significant bone infection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old male is admitted with a past medical history of active intravenous opioid use complicated by group A streptococcal bacteremia with L5-S1 discitis and osteomyelitis, L2-L3 osteomyelitis, and left ankle abscess/septic arthritis status post left ankle washout. His pain was well-controlled by acute pain service with ketamine infusion (discontinued earlier), opioids, acetaminophen, buprenorphine-naloxone, cyclobenzaprine, gabapentin, and naproxen. Intravenous opioids were discontinued, slightly decreasing the opioid regimen. A day later, the patient reported tachycardia, diaphoresis, myalgias, and chills, which the primary team reconsulted acute pain service for opioid withdrawal. However, the patient received a zoledronate infusion for hypercalcemia, on the same day intravenous opioids were discontinued. He had no other medications known to cause withdrawal-like symptoms per chart review. Therefore, it was suspected that an acute phase reaction occurred, commonly seen within a few days of bisphosphonate use. CONCLUSION: Zoledronate, well known for causing acute phase reactions, was likely the cause of withdrawal-like symptoms. Acute phase reactions with bisphosphonates mostly occur in the first infusion, and the incidence decreases with subsequent infusions. Symptoms typically occur 24-72 h post-infusion, and last at most for 72 h. Cognitive bias led the primary team to be concerned with opioid withdrawal rather than investigating other causes for the patient's presentation. Therefore, providers should thoroughly investigate potential etiologies and rule them out accordingly to provide the best care. Health care providers should also be aware of the implicit biases that potentially impact the quality of care they provide to patients.


Subject(s)
Acute-Phase Reaction , Opioid-Related Disorders , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Zoledronic Acid , Adult , Humans , Male , Acute-Phase Reaction/chemically induced , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diagnosis, Differential , Hypercalcemia/drug therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/diagnosis , Zoledronic Acid/adverse effects
6.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 291, 2024 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735917

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) affects a significant proportion of the adult population. Potent anti-resorptive drugs such as intravenous zoledronic acid have been demonstrated to reduce Modic changes (MCs) upon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine and concomitantly decrease associated LBP. It is uncertain whether oral alendronic acid has a similar effect. METHODS: 82 subjects were recruited in this case-control study. Treatment subjects (n = 41) received oral alendronic acid treatment for at least 1-year and were matched by gender and age (± 2) to control subjects (n = 41) not receiving any anti-osteoporotic medication. The prevalence, type, and extent of MCs were quantified upon T1 and T2-weighted MRIs of the lumbosacral spine. RESULTS: Treatment subjects received oral alendronic acid for 124.0 ± 62.1 weeks at the time of MRI assessment and exhibited a lower prevalence of MCs over the lumbosacral spine (18/41 vs. 30/41, p < 0.001) as compared to control subjects. Amongst both groups, type 2 MCs were predominant. Quantification of type 2 MCs in treatment subjects revealed a significant reduction in area (113 ± 106 mm2 vs. 231 ± 144 mm2, p < 0.01) and volume (453 ± 427 mm3 vs. 925 ± 575 mm3, p < 0.01) affected by type 2 MCs in comparison to matched controls. CONCLUSION: Oral alendronic acid may be useful in the treatment of MC-associated LBP in patients with concomitant osteoporosis.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Low Back Pain , Lumbar Vertebrae , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Male , Female , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Case-Control Studies , Middle Aged , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Aged , Low Back Pain/drug therapy , Low Back Pain/etiology , Low Back Pain/diagnostic imaging , Alendronate/therapeutic use , Alendronate/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Adult , Administration, Oral , Age Factors , Treatment Outcome , Sex Factors
7.
Arch Osteoporos ; 19(1): 35, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722400

ABSTRACT

This study demonstrated a large treatment gap in elderly subjects experiencing fragility fracture in Spanish primary care, a low treatment persistence among subjects who do receive treatment, and more than one-quarter having no follow-up visits post-fracture. These data highlight the need to improve secondary fracture prevention in primary care. PURPOSE: To describe osteoporosis (OP) treatment patterns and follow-up in subjects with fragility fracture seen in Spanish primary care (PC). METHODS: This observational, retrospective chart review included subjects aged ≥ 70 years listed in the centers' records (November 2018 to March 2020), with ≥ 1 fragility fracture and prior consultation for any reason; subjects who had participated in another study were excluded. Outcomes included OP treatments and follow-up visits post-fragility fracture. RESULTS: Of 665 subjects included, most (87%) were women; overall mean (SD) age, 82 years. Fewer than two thirds (61%) had received any prior OP treatment (women, 65%; men, 38%); of these, 38% had received > 1 treatment (women, 25%; men, 13%). Among treated subjects, the most frequent first-line treatments were alendronate (43%) and RANKL inhibitor denosumab (22%), with a higher discontinuation rate and shorter treatment duration observed for alendronate (discontinuation, 42% vs 16%; median treatment duration, 2.5 vs 2.1 years). Over one-quarter (26%) of subjects had no follow-up visits post-fragility fracture, with this gap higher in women than men (35% versus 25%). The most common schedule of follow-up visits was yearly (43% of subjects with a fragility fracture), followed by half-yearly (17%) and biennial (10%), with a similar trend in men and women. Most OP treatments were prescribed by PC physicians, other than teriparatide and zoledronate. CONCLUSIONS: Across Spanish PC, we observed a large gap in the treatment and follow-up of elderly subjects experiencing a fragility fracture. Our data highlights the urgent need to improve secondary fracture prevention in PC.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteoporotic Fractures , Primary Health Care , Secondary Prevention , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Spain/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/complications , Alendronate/therapeutic use , Alendronate/administration & dosage , Denosumab/therapeutic use
8.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 99(2): 773-785, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701149

ABSTRACT

Background: The amyloid-ß (Aß) enhances the number and activity of blood monocyte-derived osteoclasts (OCs). Individuals with osteoporosis (OP) face an increased risk of developing dementia or Alzheimer's disease (AD). Despite this association, the contribution of bone-resorbing OCs to the progression of AD pathology remains unclear. Objective: Our objective was to investigate the potential impacts of OCs on the development of AD pathology. Methods: We conducted targeted analysis of publicly available whole blood transcriptomes from patients with AD to characterize the blood molecular signatures and pathways associated with hyperactive OCs. In addition, we used APP23 transgenic (APP23 TG) AD mouse model to assess the effects of OCs pharmacological blockade on AD pathology and behavior. Results: Patients with AD exhibited increased osteoclastogenesis signature in their blood cells, which appears to be positively correlated with dysfunction of peripheral clearance of Aß mediated by immune cells. Long-term anti-resorptive intervention with Alendronate inhibited OC activity in APP23 mice, leading to improvements in peripheral monocyte Aß-degrading enzyme expression, Aß-deposition, and memory decline. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that OCs have a disease-promoting role in the development and progression of AD, possibly linked to their modulation of peripheral immunity. These findings guide future research to further elucidate the connection between OP and AD pathogenesis, highlighting the potential benefits of preventing OP in alleviating cognitive burden.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Disease Progression , Mice, Transgenic , Osteoclasts , Alzheimer Disease/metabolism , Alzheimer Disease/pathology , Animals , Mice , Humans , Osteoclasts/metabolism , Alendronate/pharmacology , Alendronate/therapeutic use , Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/genetics , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Male , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use
9.
Arch Osteoporos ; 19(1): 37, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744716

ABSTRACT

Osteoporosis is a common but sub-optimally managed disease amongst aged care residents. Pharmacists undertaking comprehensive medication reviews is one strategy to improve osteoporosis management. Analysis of pharmacist medication review recommendations has identified common clinical practice issues that can be addressed to optimise osteoporosis management for aged care residents. PURPOSE: This study investigates the prevalence of osteoporosis medicine use amongst Australian aged care residents and explores drug-related problems (DRPs) identified during medication reviews and pharmacist recommendations to resolve them. METHODS: Resident demographics, medications, diagnoses, osteoporosis related DRPs, and recommendations to resolve them were extracted from medication review reports. A mixed methods approach was taken to analysis, involving descriptive statistical analysis and content analysis. RESULTS: Medication review reports relating to 980 residents were collected. Antiresorptive therapies were used by 21.7% of residents, of which 87.2% were prescribed denosumab. Osteoporosis related DRPs represented 14.0% of all DRPs identified by pharmacists. Vitamin D was involved in 55.4% of these DRPs, the remainder concerned antiresorptive therapies (23.4%), medications contributing to osteoporosis (16.3%), and calcium (4.9%). Frequent deviations in practice from aged care clinical guidelines and consensus recommendations concerning vitamin D and calcium were found. DRPs and accompanying recommendations relating to denosumab revealed inadequate monitoring and inadvertent therapy disruptions. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist identified DRPs and recommendations revealed common aspects of clinical practice that can be addressed to improve osteoporosis management for aged care residents. A need to raise awareness of aged care-specific consensus recommendations concerning vitamin D and calcium is evident. Facility protocols and procedures must be developed and implemented to ensure safe and effective use of denosumab.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteoporosis , Humans , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Australia/epidemiology , Female , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Aged , Male , Aged, 80 and over , Homes for the Aged/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data
10.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 32: e20230447, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695448

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) repairs bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) modulated by the reduction of NF-kB protein in a murine model. METHODOLOGY: Male Wistar rats (N=30) were divided into the following groups (n=6/group): negative control (NC); experimental osteonecrosis (ONE); ONE + photosensitizer (PS); ONE + photobiomodulation (PBM); and ONE + aPDT. Over 8 weeks, ONE was induced by zoledronic acid 250 µg/kg injections, except in the NC group, which received sterile 0.9% saline, followed by extraction of the lower left first molar. Red light laser irradiation (wavelength ~660 nm, power 50 mW, energy of 2 J, energy dose of 66.67 J/cm2 for 40 s) was performed once a week for 4 weeks. Methylene blue 0.3% was used as PS. The animals were euthanized and examined macroscopically for the presence of exposed bone and epithelial repair and microscopically by histochemical (hematoxylin-eosin and Masson's trichrome staining) and immunohistochemical (anti-NF-kB) methods. Macroscopic and histomorphometric data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-test (p<0.05). RESULTS: Mucosal repair, viable osteocytes, and NF-kB immunostaining were observed in the NC, ONE+PS, ONE+PBM, and ONE+aPDT groups. The ONE group showed no mucosal repair, showing empty lacunae and multifocal immunostaining for NF-kB. The ONE+PBM and ONE+aPDT groups had greater deposition of extracellular matrix and less necrotic bone tissue (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: PBM and aPDT treatments for BRONJ were effective for bone and epithelial repair, in addition to reducing inflammation mediated by the decrease of NF-kB protein in the irradiated regions.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Disease Models, Animal , Immunohistochemistry , NF-kappa B , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents , Rats, Wistar , Animals , Male , Photochemotherapy/methods , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/pathology , NF-kappa B/analysis , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Time Factors , Reproducibility of Results , Zoledronic Acid/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Methylene Blue/pharmacology , Methylene Blue/therapeutic use , Analysis of Variance , Random Allocation , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology
11.
Arch Osteoporos ; 19(1): 36, 2024 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740651

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to estimate societal and healthcare costs incurred before and 1 year after the first fracture liaison services (FLS) visit and to explore differences in fracture type. All costs after 1 year significantly decreased compared to costs preceding the first visit. Fracture type did not significantly affect costs. INTRODUCTION: Limited literature is available on resource utilization and costs of patients visiting fracture liaison services (FLS). This study aimed to estimate the societal and healthcare costs incurred by patients with a recent fracture requiring anti-osteoporosis medication before and 1 year after the first FLS visit and to explore differences according to fracture type. METHODS: Resource utilization was collected through a self-reported questionnaire with a 4-month recall on health resource utilization and productivity losses immediately following the first FLS visit, and 4 and 12 months later. Unit costs derived from the national Dutch guideline for economic evaluations were used to compute societal and healthcare costs. Linear mixed-effect models, adjusted for confounders, were used to analyze societal and healthcare costs over time as well as the effect of fracture type on societal and healthcare costs. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients from two Dutch FLS centers were included, of whom 72 sustained a major fracture (hip, vertebral, humerus, or radius). Societal costs in the 4 months prior to the first visit (€2911) were significantly higher compared to societal costs 4 months (€711, p-value = 0.009) and 12 months later (€581, p-value = 0.001). Fracture type did not have a significant effect on total societal or healthcare costs. All costs 12 months after the initial visit were numerically lower for major fractures compared to others. CONCLUSION: Societal and healthcare costs in the year following the first FLS visit significantly decreased compared to those costs preceding the first visit.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Health Care Costs , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Humans , Female , Male , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/economics , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/economics , Netherlands , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost of Illness
12.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 104(17): 1456-1465, 2024 May 07.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706051

ABSTRACT

Osteoporotic fracture is the most serious complication of osteoporosis, which is a special type of pathologic fracture of the skeleton that occurs because of osteoporosis. It is characterized by delayed fracture healing, high risk of re-fracture, high rate of disability and death, difficulty in treatment and long treatment time, and re-fracture has a"cascade effect". Guidelines in different countries recommend that patients with osteoporotic fractures and those at very high risk of fracture should consider anabolic agents as first treatment choice. Teriparatide is the only anabolic agent approved by National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), and it has the clinical efficacy of improving fracture healing, reducing the risk of re-fracture, and improving bone microstructure in the treatment of osteoporotic fracture. Due to deficiencies in the current standardization of clinical use of teriparatide, Committee of Accelerated Rehabilitation After Osteoporotic Fractures of China Association of Rehabilitation Technology Transformation and Promotion, Bone and Joint Group of Chinese Society of Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Research and Osteoporosis Working Committee of Chinese Association of Orthopedic Surgeons developed this consensus. The development of this consensus follows the modified Delphi method and forms 8 evidence-based medical recommendations, aiming to propose methods and precautions for standardizing the application of teriparatide, and to emphasize the importance of teriparatide application for the treatment of patients with osteoporotic fracture.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Teriparatide , Teriparatide/therapeutic use , Humans , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Osteoporotic Fractures/drug therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , China , Consensus
13.
Arch Osteoporos ; 19(1): 34, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698101

ABSTRACT

We present comprehensive guidelines for osteoporosis management in Qatar. Formulated by the Qatar Osteoporosis Association, the guidelines recommend the age-dependent Qatar fracture risk assessment tool for screening, emphasizing risk-based treatment strategies and discouraging routine dual-energy X-ray scans. They offer a vital resource for physicians managing osteoporosis and fragility fractures nationwide. PURPOSE: Osteoporosis and related fragility fractures are a growing public health issue with an impact on individuals and the healthcare system. We aimed to present guidelines providing unified guidance to all healthcare professionals in Qatar regarding the management of osteoporosis. METHODS: The Qatar Osteoporosis Association formulated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men above the age of 50. A panel of six local rheumatologists who are experts in the field of osteoporosis met together and conducted an extensive review of published articles and local and international guidelines to formulate guidance for the screening and management of postmenopausal women and men older than 50 years in Qatar. RESULTS: The guidelines emphasize the use of the age-dependent hybrid model of the Qatar fracture risk assessment tool for screening osteoporosis and risk categorization. The guidelines include screening, risk stratification, investigations, treatment, and monitoring of patients with osteoporosis. The use of a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan without any risk factors is discouraged. Treatment options are recommended based on risk stratification. CONCLUSION: Guidance is provided to all physicians across the country who are involved in the care of patients with osteoporosis and fragility fractures.


Subject(s)
Osteoporotic Fractures , Humans , Female , Qatar/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/epidemiology , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/therapy , Absorptiometry, Photon/statistics & numerical data , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/therapy , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Bone Density , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Practice Guidelines as Topic
14.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 36(1): 103, 2024 May 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704788

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are the most serious fragility fractures due to their associated disability, higher hospitalization costs and high mortality rates. Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) programs have enhanced the management of osteoporosis-related fractures and have shown their clinical effectiveness. AIMS: To analyze the effect of the implementation of a FLS model of care over the survival and mortality rates following a hip fracture. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study on patients over 60 years of age who suffered a hip fracture before and after the implementation of the FLS in our center (between January 2016 and December 2019). Patients were followed for three years after the index date. Mortality, complications and refracture rates were compared between the two groups using a Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: A total of 1366 patients were included in this study (353 before FLS implementation and 1013 after FLS implementation). Anti-osteoporotic drugs were more frequently prescribed after FLS implementation (79.3% vs 12.5%; p < 0.01) and there was an increase in adherence to treatment (51.7% vs 30.2%; p < 0.01). A total of 413 (40.8%) patients after FLS implementation and 141 (39.9%) individuals before (p = 0.47) died during the three-years follow-up period. A second fracture occurred in 101 (10.0%) patients after FLS implementation and 37 (10.5%) individuals before (p = 0.78). Patients after the implementation of the FLS protocol had a lower all cause one-year mortality [adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.74 (0.57-0.94)] and a decreased risk of suffering a second osteoporotic fracture [adjusted HR 0.54 (0.39-0.75) in males and adjusted HR 0.46 (0.30-0.71) in females]. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a FLS protocol was associated with a lower all-cause one-year mortality rate and a higher survivorship in elderly hip fracture patients. However, no three-year mortality rate differences were observed between the two groups. We also found a reduction in the complication and second-fracture rates.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Secondary Prevention , Humans , Hip Fractures/mortality , Female , Male , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Osteoporotic Fractures/mortality , Secondary Prevention/methods , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use
15.
Braz Oral Res ; 38: e038, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747825

ABSTRACT

The aim of this systematic review was to answer the following question: "Does alendronate, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, improve or impair alveolar socket healing after tooth extraction in animal models"? To this end, a systematic review of the literature was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, as well as in the gray literature up to May 2023. Preclinical studies that evaluated alveolar healing after tooth extraction and the intake of sodium alendronate compared with placebo were included. Two investigators were responsible for screening the articles independently, extracting the data, and assessing their quality through the SYRCLE's RoB tool for randomized trials in animal studies. The study selection process, study characteristics, risk of bias in studies, impact of alendronate on bone healing, and certainty of evidence were described in text and table formats. Methodological differences among the studies were restricted to the synthesis methods. The synthesis of qualitative results followed the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline. From the 19 included studies, five were considered to have low risk, three were of unclear risk, and eleven presented a high risk of bias. The studies were considered heterogeneous regarding alendronate posology, including its dosage and route of administration. Furthermore, a variety of animal species, different age ranges, diverse teeth extracted, and exposure or not to ovariectomy contributed to the lack of parity of the selected studies. Our results indicated that alendronate monotherapy negatively affects the early phase of wound healing after tooth extraction in preclinical studies, suggesting that the bone resorption process after tooth extraction in animals treated with alendronate might impair the bone healing process of the extraction socket. In conclusion, alendronate administration restrains bone resorption, thereby delaying alveolar socket healing . Future studies should be conducted to validate these findings and to better understand the effects of alendronate therapy on oral tissues.


Subject(s)
Alendronate , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Tooth Extraction , Tooth Socket , Wound Healing , Alendronate/pharmacology , Alendronate/therapeutic use , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Animals , Wound Healing/drug effects , Tooth Socket/drug effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use
16.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(4): 741-751, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751272

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the effect of subcutaneous teriparatide therapy on fracture healing rate and change in bone mass density in osteoporotic hip fractures. METHODS: The meta-analysis was done from September to December 2022, and comprised literature search on Wanfang, CNKI, VIP, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from the establishment of the respective database till December 2022. The relevant journals of the library of Macao University of Science and Technology, China, were manually searched for randomised controlled trials of teriparatide in the treatment of osteoporotic hip fractures. The shortlisted studies were subjectd to Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Jadad Rating Scale. Meta-analysis was done using the RevMan 5.4 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration Network. Fracture healing rate and bone mineral density were the primary outcome measures, while mortality, adverse events, malformations, complications, subsequent fractures, timed-up-and-go test, visual analogue scale score, and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide were the secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Of the 1,094 articles retrieved, 8(0.7%) randomised controlled trials were analysed. There were 744 patients; 372(50%) in the teriparatide group and 372(50%) in the control group. Fracture healing rate was not significantly different (p=0.82), while bone mineral density was significantly different between the groups (p<0.001). Mortality, adverse events, deformity, and complications were not significantly different (p>0.05), while subsequent fractures, timed-up-and-go score, visual analogue scale score and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide were significantly different between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: The literature did not support teriparatide's ability to improve the healing rate of osteoporotic hip fractures, or to reduce mortality, adverse events, malformations, and complications. In addition, teriparatide could increase bone mineral density of osteoporotic hip fractures and the procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide value, alleviate hip pain, and reduce subsequent fracture rates. This trial is registered with PROSPERO with registration number CRD42022379832.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Bone Density , Fracture Healing , Hip Fractures , Osteoporotic Fractures , Teriparatide , Humans , Teriparatide/therapeutic use , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density/drug effects , Fracture Healing/drug effects , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Peptide Fragments , Procollagen/blood
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 8744, 2024 04 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627515

ABSTRACT

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) poses a challenging form of osteomyelitis in patients undergoing antiresorptive therapies in contrast to conventional osteomyelitis. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological features of MRONJ between patients receiving low-dose medications for osteoporosis and those receiving high-dose medications for oncologic purposes. The clinical, panoramic radiographic, and computed tomography data of 159 patients with MRONJ (osteoporotic group, n = 120; oncologic group, n = 39) who developed the condition after using antiresorptive medications for the management of osteoporosis or bone malignancy were analyzed. The osteoporotic group was older (75.8 vs. 60.4 years, p < 0.01) and had a longer duration of medication usage than the oncologic group (58.1 vs. 28.0 months, p < 0.01). Pus discharge and swelling were more common in the osteoporotic group (p < 0.05), whereas bone exposure was more frequent in the oncologic group (p < 0.01). The mandibular cortical index (MCI) in panoramic radiographs was higher in the osteoporotic group (p < 0.01). The mean sequestra size was larger in the oncologic group than in the osteoporotic group (15.3 vs. 10.6 mm, p < 0.05). The cured rate was significantly higher in the osteoporotic group (66.3% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.01). Oncologic MRONJ exhibited distinct clinical findings including rapid disease onset, fewer purulent signs, and lower cure rates than osteoporotic MRONJ. Radiological features such as sequestrum size on CT scan, and MCI values on panoramic radiographs, may aid in differentiating MRONJ in osteoporotic and oncologic patients.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteomyelitis , Osteoporosis , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/chemically induced , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Diphosphonates/adverse effects
18.
J Bone Miner Res ; 39(1): 8-16, 2024 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630878

ABSTRACT

Adjuvant bisphosphonates are often recommended in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer at intermediate-to-high risk of disease recurrence, but the magnitude and duration of their effects on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs) are not well described. We evaluated the impact of adjuvant zoledronate on areal BMD and BTMs in a sub-group of patients who had completed the large 5-yr randomized Adjuvant Zoledronic Acid to Reduce Recurrence (AZURE) trial. About 224 women (recurrence free) who had completed the AZURE trial within the previous 3 mo were recruited from 20 UK AZURE trial sites. One hundred twenty had previously been randomized to zoledronate (19 doses of 4 mg over 5 yr) and 104 to the control arm. BMD and BTMs were assessed at sub-study entry, 6 (BTMs only), 12, 24, and 60 mo following the completion of AZURE. As expected, mean BMD, T-scores, and Z-scores at sub-study entry were higher in the zoledronate vs the control arm. At the lumbar spine, the mean (SD) standardized BMD (sBMD) was 1123 (201) and 985 (182) mg/cm2 in the zoledronate and control arms, respectively (P < .0001). The baseline differences in sBMD persisted at all assessed skeletal sites and throughout the 5-yr follow-up period. In patients completing zoledronate treatment, BTMs were significantly lower than those in the control arm (α- and ß-urinary C-telopeptide of type-I collagen, both P < .00001; serum intact pro-collagen I N-propeptide, P < .00001 and serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, P = .0001). Some offset of bone turnover inhibition occurred in the 12 mo following the completion of zoledronate treatment. Thereafter, during the 60 mo of follow-up, all BTMs remained suppressed in the zoledronate arm relative to the control arm. In conclusion, in addition to the known anti-cancer benefits of adjuvant zoledronate, there are likely to be positive, lasting benefits in BMD and bone turnover.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Zoledronic Acid/pharmacology , Bone Density , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Lumbar Vertebrae , Bone Remodeling , Collagen
19.
J Bone Miner Res ; 39(1): 3-7, 2024 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630882

ABSTRACT

A 47-year-old postmenopausal woman with osteoporosis was treated with denosumab, which was discontinued due to side effects. She was therefore transitioned to a yearly intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid. An increase in bone turnover markers together with bone loss at the lumbar spine was observed before the second infusion, suggesting an overshooting of bone resorption due to denosumab discontinuation. On physical examination, the patient was restless and reported having lost about 10 kg since the last visit. A solitary left inferior thyroid nodule was noted on neck palpation. Circulating thyroid hormone levels were elevated, with suppressed thyroid-stimulating hormone. A thyroid scan showed increased uptake in the left inferior nodule with suppression of the remainder of the thyroid gland. A diagnosis of hyperthyroidism due to toxic adenoma was made. The patient was treated with radioactive iodine ablation, with consequent complete normalization of thyroid function. She continued yearly treatment with zoledronic acid. She remained clinically well with no further fractures. Bone turnover markers were appropriately suppressed and bone mineral density increased in the spine and hip. This case illustrates how the overshooting phenomenon following denosumab discontinuation may be compounded by the development of secondary conditions, which can result in suboptimal response to antiresorptive osteoporosis medications.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Bone Diseases, Metabolic , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal , Osteoporosis , Thyroid Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Zoledronic Acid/therapeutic use , Iodine Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Thyroid Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/drug therapy , Bone Density , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy
20.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 7914, 2024 04 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575664

ABSTRACT

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious adverse reaction associated with antiresorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates and denosumab. When dealing with advanced and/or multiple MRONJ lesions undergoing surgical therapy, the extent of surgery is often a topic of discussion. The aim of this study was to identify the differences in bone density in and around the MRONJ lesion before and after surgical treatment to evaluate the needed surgical extend of the modelling osteotomy. In this retrospective study 26 patients with MRONJ lesions that were surgically treated in our department were observed. Length, width and bone density were measured in panoramic radiograph pre and postoperatively with the Imaging processing software Sidexis and ImageJ (Fiji). The necrotic area, the surrounding sclerotic area as well as the healthy contralateral side were observed. Measurements were performed by two independent observers. Pearson correlation was calculated to determine the interobserver variability. Bone density was significantly reduced in the necrotic bone area compared to the healthy unaffected contralateral reference side. The sclerotic bone area surrounding the necrosis showed increased bone density compared to the contralateral unaffected reference side. The density of the sclerotic bone area was increased in the previously affected MRONJ area in the postoperative panoramic radiograph. The pre and postoperative density showed no significant correlation to healing behaviour. The focus of the modelling osteotomy in surgical treatment of mature MRONJ lesions should be predominantly on the parts that appear necrotic and less dense in the panoramic radiograph as sclerotic areas might be an expression of bone reaction.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteonecrosis , Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/surgery , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/drug therapy , Denosumab/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteonecrosis/surgery , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Necrosis/chemically induced
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...