Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 53
Filter
2.
Cancer Radiother ; 26(1-2): 14-19, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953695

ABSTRACT

The French sanitary and regulatory context in which radiotherapy centres are comprised is evolving. Risk and quality management systems are currently adapting to these evolutions. The French nuclear safety agency (ASN) decision of July 1st 2008 on quality assurance obligations in radiotherapy has reached 10 years of age, and the French high authority of health (HAS) certification system 20 years now. Mandatory tools needed for the improvement of quality and safety in healthcare are now well known. From now on, the focus of healthcare policies is oriented towards evaluation of efficiency of these new organisations designed following ASN and HAS nationwide guidelines.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Oncology/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Clinical Audit/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Audit/methods , France , Humans , Patient Participation/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Improvement/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Oncology/standards , Radiotherapy , Risk Management/methods , Societies, Medical
4.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book ; 40: 1-11, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32379986

ABSTRACT

In the United States, many cancer centers advertise their clinical services directly to the public. Although there are potential public benefits from such advertising, including increased patient awareness of treatment options and improved access to care and clinical trials, there is also potential for harm through misinformation, provision of false hope, inappropriate use of health care resources, and disruption in doctor-patient relationships. Although patient education through advertising is appropriate, misleading patients in the name of gaining market share, boosting profits, or even boosting trial accrual is not. It is critical that rigorous ethical guidelines are adopted and that oversight is introduced to ensure that cancer center marketing supports good patient care and public health interests. Patients with cancer have been identified as an especially vulnerable population because of fears and anxiety related to their diagnosis and the very real need to identify optimal sources of care. Cancer organizations have a fiduciary duty and a moral and legal obligation to provide truthful information to avoid deceptive, inaccurate claims associated with treatment success. In this article, actionable recommendations are provided for both the oncologist and the cancer center's marketing team to promote ethical marketing of services to patients with cancer. This tailored guidance for the oncology community includes explicit communication on (1) ensuring fair and balanced promotion of cancer services, (2) avoiding exaggeration of claims in the context of reputational marketing, (3) providing data and statistics to support direct and implied assertions of treatment success, and (4) defining eligible patient groups in the context of marketing for research. These recommendations for cancer centers are designed to promote ethical quality marketing information to patients with cancer.


Subject(s)
Academies and Institutes , Cancer Care Facilities , Direct-to-Consumer Advertising , Academies and Institutes/ethics , Academies and Institutes/history , Academies and Institutes/legislation & jurisprudence , Cancer Care Facilities/ethics , Cancer Care Facilities/history , Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Direct-to-Consumer Advertising/ethics , Direct-to-Consumer Advertising/history , Direct-to-Consumer Advertising/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Communication , Health Literacy , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Oncologists , Public Policy
5.
Radiother Oncol ; 148: 203-210, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32342870

ABSTRACT

The epidemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) first broke out in Wuhan in December 2019, and reached its peak in Wuhan in February 2020. It became a major public health challenge for China, and evolved into a global pandemic in March 2020. For radiation oncology departments, the COVID-19 pandemic presents a unique challenge for disease protection and prevention for both patients and staff, owing to the weakened immune systems of cancer patients and the need to deliver timely and uninterrupted radiotherapy. At the Hubei Cancer Hospital, the only hospital in Wuhan that specializes in oncology, we organized an emergency infection control team to lead special efforts to combat COVID-19 during this challenging time. Under its lead, the following measures were implemented in the radiation oncology department: the radiotherapy clinic was divided into different infection control zones with varying levels of protection; special staff and patient infection control training sessions were conducted and appropriate measures deployed; daily symptom testing criteria were implemented for patients undergoing treatment; special rotating schedules and infection control methods were implemented for various staff members such as medical physicists/dosimetrists and radiation therapists; modified radiotherapy workflow and specialized treatment area cleaning and disinfection policies and procedures were designed and executed; and special medical waste disposal methods were implemented. We began treating patients using this new COVID-19 radiotherapy treatment workflow and infection control measures on January 30, 2020. During more than one and a half months of uninterrupted radiation oncology clinical operation through the worst of the Wuhan outbreak, no known COVID-19 infection occurred at our radiotherapy center to our patients or employees. This report may provide valuable information for other radiation oncology departments during this unprecedented public health crisis.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , COVID-19 , Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Workflow
6.
Rio de Janeiro; s.n; 2020. 194 p. graf, ilus, tab.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1425433

ABSTRACT

Estudo descritivo retrospectivo realizado no Instituto Nacional do Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva, HCI-Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, (INCA-HCI-RJ), no qual foram avaliadas infecções relacionadas aos acessos venosos para tratamento oncológico, nos setores Onco-Hematológicos pediátricos. A infecção representa uma importante complicação em pacientes oncológicos em tratamento. Devido ao tratamento oncológico que envolve: procedimentos cirúrgicos muitas vezes mutilantes, tratamento com quimioterápicos que ocasionam períodos de imunossupressão e neutropenia, e tratamento radioterápico com radiação e lise celular. O uso de dispositivos venosos associados a períodos de imunossupressão pode levar a infecção da corrente sanguínea e outras complicações (por exemplo trombose). No presente estudo foram investigados aspectos clínico-epidemiológicos das infecções e da susceptibilidade antimicrobiana em amostras clínicas obtidas de processos infecciosos associados ao uso de cateteres venosos de longa permanência no tratamento oncológico em pacientes do Hospital do Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva, HCI/INCA, Rio de Janeiro Brasil. Foram avaliadas: a) prevalência das espécies diversas relacionadas aos quadros infecciosos identificados nestes pacientes oncológicos; b) prevalência de casos de complicações e outras infecções invasivas relacionadas ao uso de cateteres de longa permanência; c) perfis de susceptibilidade a antimicrobianos e ocorrência de multirresistência. O desenvolvimento deste projeto de pesquisa possibilitou a observação análise e validação da evolução dos processos envolvidos nos quadros de infecções nosocomiais em pacientes oncológicos pediátricos na prevenção de complicações que envolvem todo o sistema de saúde, além de contribuir na escolha de antimicrobianos e estratégias terapêuticas mais efetivas para o tratamento de infecções em cateteres por espécies multirresistentes de Corynebacterium.


Retrospective descriptive study conducted at the National Cancer Institute José Alencar Gomes da Silva, INCA / HCI-Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, (INCA-HCI-RJ). Infection represents an important complication in cancer patients. This group is more prone to infections due to the cancer treatment that involves: surgical procedures often mutilating, treatment with chemotherapy that cause periods of immunosuppression even with neutropenia, and radiotherapy treatment with radiation and cell lysis. The vascular devices associated with these periods can lead to bloodstream infection besides others complication as thrombosis. The number of reports of infections in hospitalized cancer patients increases morbidity and mortality rates. In the present study clinical and epidemiological aspects of infections were identified and antimicrobial susceptibility were investigated in clinical exams and samples from blood patients and venous catheter in children oncological patients at the José de Alencar Gomes da Silva, HCI / INCA, Rio de Janeiro Brazil. It was possible evaluate a) prevalence of various species infections in cancer patients; b) prevalence of cases of complications and other invasive infections related to the use of long-term catheters; c) antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and occurrence of multidrug resistance. The development of this research project in nosocomial infections in pediatric cancer patients was enabled analysis and validation of some process involved to prevent vascular complications that involve entire health system. In addition to contributing to the choice of antimicrobials and the most effective therapeutic strategies for the treatment of multi-resistant Corynebacterium sp.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Strategies , Infection Control/history , Corynebacterium/pathogenicity , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Immunosuppression Therapy , Infection Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Immunocompromised Host , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Central Venous Catheters/history , Hematology , Hospitals, Pediatric , Lymphoproliferative Disorders , Neoplasms/complications , Neutropenia/diagnosis
8.
Breast J ; 24(5): 811-815, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29687531

ABSTRACT

The European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) requires that the breast centers' core team includes a trained person responsible for data collection and analysis. We addressed a questionnaire to the data managers of the EUSOMA breast centers network in order to acquire information with regard to their education, training, role, activity, recognition, and satisfaction. Breast centers' data managers are highly educated individuals with a variety of backgrounds carrying out, more frequently part-time and as temporary employees, a job for which they received little specific training. These findings support the importance of defining a core curriculum and a training program.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Certification/standards , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Europe , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Societies, Medical , Specialization , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27983709

ABSTRACT

Background: Legislation preventing smoking in public places was introduced in England in July 2007. Since then, smoke-free policies have been extended to the majority of hospitals including those providing cancer therapies. Whilst studies have been conducted on the impact and effectiveness of hospital smoke-free policy in the UK and other countries, there have not been any studies with a focus on cancer care providers. Cancer patients are a priority group for smoking cessation and support and this study aimed to examine implementation of the National Institute Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance (PH48) in acute cancer care trusts in the UK. Methods: Participants were recruited from UK radiotherapy and chemotherapy departments (total 80 sites, 65 organisations) and asked to complete a 15 min online questionnaire exploring the implementation of NICE guidance at their hospital site. Results: Considerable variability in implementation of the NICE guidance was observed. A total of 79.1% trusts were smoke-free in theory; however, only 18.6% were described as smoke-free in practice. Areas of improvement were identified in information and support for patients and staff including in Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) provision, staff training and clarity on e-cigarette policies. Conclusions: While some trusts have effective smoke-free policies and provide valuable cessation support services for patients, improvements are required to ensure that all sites fully adopt the NICE guidance.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Secondary Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoke-Free Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , State Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices , United Kingdom
11.
Healthc Policy ; 10(Spec issue): 45-55, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25305388

ABSTRACT

Cancer Care Ontario (CCO), the provincial cancer agency, operates under a model of accountable governance that has been hailed as exemplary. We explored cancer system leaders' views on the balance and perceived efficacy of approaches to accountability in this context. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 participants (MOHLTC=5, CCO=14). Adopting a qualitative descriptive approach, we coded data for four policy instruments used in approaches to accountability. Financial incentives are a key lever used by both parties to effect change. Cancer-specific regulations were somewhat weak, but agency-wide directives were a necessary nuisance that had great force. The effect of public reporting on mobilizing consumer sovereignty was questioned; however, transparency for its own sake was highly valued. Professionalism and stewardship, with an emphasis on trust-based partnerships and clinical engagement, were critical to CCO's success. These approaches were seen to work together, but what made each have force was reliance on professionalism and stewardship.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Long-Term Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Social Responsibility , Cancer Care Facilities/economics , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Legislation, Medical , Long-Term Care/economics , Long-Term Care/organization & administration , Models, Organizational , Ontario , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/economics , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Qualitative Research , Reimbursement, Incentive
14.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 48(3): 364-73, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24439846

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Policymaking plays an important role in national palliative care services. The Japanese Cancer Control Act was implemented in 2006. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in the structure and processes of palliative care services after implementation of the Cancer Control Act. METHODS: We conducted annual nationwide surveys in designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs, n = 349) between 2008 and 2010. The 65-item questionnaire was divided into seven domains: institutional framework, information to patient and family, practice of palliative care, activities of the palliative care teams (PCTs), members of PCTs, regional medical cooperation, and education. Increasing trends were tested using generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: The response rates were ≥ 99%. All domains showed an increasing trend (P < 0.001). There were significant increases in full-time PCT physicians (27.4%-45.7%, P(trend) < 0.001), full-time PCT nurses (38.9%-88.0%, P(trend) < 0.001), and the median number of annual referrals to PCTs (60-80 patients, P < 0.001). Essential drugs were available in most DCCHs from baseline. Although outpatient clinics increased significantly (27.0%-58.9%, P(trend) < 0.001), community outreach programs did not (9.0%-12.6%, P = 0.05). Basic education was actively introduced for in-hospital physicians and nurses (78.2% and 91.4% in 2010), but often unavailable for regional health care providers (basic education for regional physicians and nurses: 63.9% and 71.1% in 2010). CONCLUSION: The Cancer Control Act promoted the development and enhancement of palliative care services in DCCHs. Regional medical cooperation and education are the future challenges of palliative care in Japan.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Palliative Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Palliative Care/methods , Education, Professional , Humans , Japan , Patient Care Team , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workforce
15.
Rev Infirm ; (203): 31-2, 2014.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26043546

ABSTRACT

Pascale Auguste has been working as a nurse hygienist for four years. Her managerial and pedagogical skills, specialised and up-to-date knowledge and human qualities enable her to work efficiently with the nursing teams. The diversity of the missions which she carries out makes her practice in hospital hygiene, not only complex but also very interesting.


Subject(s)
Hygiene , Nurse Clinicians , Nurse's Role , Adult , Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Hygiene/education , Nurse Clinicians/education , Nurse Clinicians/psychology , Patient Care Team , Workforce
16.
Fed Regist ; 78(160): 50495-1040, 2013 Aug 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23977713

ABSTRACT

We are revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. Some of the changes implement certain statutory provisions contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively known as the Affordable Care Act) and other legislation. These changes will be applicable to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2013, unless otherwise specified in this final rule. We also are updating the rate-of-increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits. The updated rate-of-increase limits will be effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2013. We also are updating the payment policies and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) and implementing certain statutory changes that were applied to the LTCH PPS by the Affordable Care Act. Generally, these updates and statutory changes will be applicable to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2013, unless otherwise specified in this final rule. In addition, we are making a number of changes relating to direct graduate medical education (GME) and indirect medical education (IME) payments. We are establishing new requirements or have revised requirements for quality reporting by specific providers (acute care hospitals, PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, LTCHs, and inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPFs)) that are participating in Medicare. We are updating policies relating to the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. In addition, we are revising the conditions of participation (CoPs) for hospitals relating to the administration of vaccines by nursing staff as well as the CoPs for critical access hospitals relating to the provision of acute care inpatient services. We are finalizing proposals issued in two separate proposed rules that included payment policies related to patient status: payment of Medicare Part B inpatient services; and admission and medical review criteria for payment of hospital inpatient services under Medicare Part A.


Subject(s)
Economics, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Legislation, Hospital/economics , Long-Term Care/economics , Medicare/economics , Prospective Payment System/economics , Quality Assurance, Health Care/economics , Cancer Care Facilities/economics , Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Education, Medical, Graduate/economics , Education, Medical, Graduate/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Reform/economics , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Psychiatric/economics , Hospitals, Psychiatric/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Inpatients/legislation & jurisprudence , Long-Term Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Mandatory Reporting , Medicare/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Prospective Payment System/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , United States , Value-Based Purchasing/economics , Value-Based Purchasing/legislation & jurisprudence
17.
Zentralbl Chir ; 138(1): 38-44, 2013 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22083348

ABSTRACT

In this contribution the rational of colorectal cancer centre certification is discussed on the basis of previously published literature and several unsettled factors which are not yet considered as influencing the quality of cancer treatment. The representation of the theme cannot be comprehensive or complete. The readers should be stimulated by one or the other topic to reach their own critical assessment. Due to several limitations of the published literature and the various unsettled aspects, the purpose of colorectal cancer centre certification is called into question.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Cancer Care Facilities/standards , Certification/organization & administration , Certification/standards , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Surgery/organization & administration , Colorectal Surgery/standards , Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Surgery/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethics, Medical , Germany , Health Services Needs and Demand/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Needs and Demand/organization & administration , Health Services Needs and Demand/standards , Humans , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , National Health Programs/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...