Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 181
Filter
1.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 7: 410-415, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33760639

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted cancer care in Africa, further exposing major health disparities. This paper compares and contrasts the experiences of 15 clinicians in six different African cancer centers to highlight the positive aspects (silver linings) in an otherwise negative situation. METHODS: Data are from personal experience of the clinicians working at the six cancer centers blended with what is available in the literature. RESULTS: The impact of COVID-19 on cancer care appeared to vary not only across the continent but also over cancer centers. Different factors such as clinic location, services offered, available resources, and level of restrictions imposed because of COVID-19 were associated with these variations. Collectively, delays in treatment and limited access to cancer care were commonly reported in the different regions. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of data on cancer patients with COVID-19 and online COVID-19 and cancer registries for Africa. Analysis of the available data, however, suggests a higher mortality rate for cancer patients with COVID-19 compared with those without cancer. Positive or silver linings coming out of the pandemic include the adoption of hypofractionated radiation therapy and teleoncology to enhance access to care while protecting patients and staff members. Increasing collaborations using online technology with oncology health professionals across the world are also being seen as a silver lining, with valuable sharing of experiences and expertise to improve care, enhance learning, and reduce disparities. Advanced information and communication technologies are seen as vital for such collaborations and could avail efforts in dealing with the ongoing pandemic and potential future crises.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cancer Care Facilities , Neoplasms , Africa/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Cancer Care Facilities/trends , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoplasms/virology
5.
Future Oncol ; 16(28): 2191-2195, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32857603

ABSTRACT

Background: Telemedicine is seen as a savior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials & methods: This study is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted with cancer patients who were interviewed via telemedicine from a tertiary care comprehensive oncology center. Results: A total of 421 patients were included in the study and 118 of them (28.0%) were >65 years old. Communication was provided most frequently by voice call (n = 213; 50.5%). The majority of the patients contacted by telemedicine had breast cancer (n = 270; 64.1%). For 135 patients (32.1%) no further examination or intervention was required and the previously planned follow-up visit was postponed by the clinician. Conclusion: This study showed that telemedicine could open a new era for medical oncology specialists.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cancer Survivors , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aftercare/methods , Aftercare/organization & administration , Aftercare/standards , Aftercare/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms, Male , COVID-19 , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Cancer Care Facilities/standards , Cancer Care Facilities/trends , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/diagnosis , Genital Neoplasms, Female/drug therapy , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infection Control/standards , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Male , Medical Oncology/methods , Medical Oncology/standards , Medical Oncology/trends , Medication Therapy Management/organization & administration , Medication Therapy Management/standards , Medication Therapy Management/trends , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/standards , Telemedicine/trends
6.
Oncologist ; 25(10): e1509-e1515, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32735386

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a public health emergency affecting frail populations, including patients with cancer. This poses the question of whether cancer treatments can be postponed or modified without compromising their efficacy, especially for highly curable cancers such as germ cell tumors (GCTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To depict the state-of-the-art management of GCTs during the COVID-19 pandemic, a survey including 26 questions was circulated by e-mail among the physicians belonging to three cooperative groups: (a) Italian Germ Cell Cancer Group; (b) European Reference Network-Rare Adult Solid Cancers, Domain G3 (rare male genitourinary cancers); and (c) Genitourinary Medical Oncologists of Canada. Percentages of agreement between Italian respondents (I) versus Canadian respondents (C), I versus European respondents (E), and E versus C were compared by using Fisher's exact tests for dichotomous answers and chi square test for trends for the questions with three or more options. RESULTS: Fifty-three GCT experts responded to the survey: 20 Italian, 6 in other European countries, and 27 from Canada. Telemedicine was broadly used; there was high consensus to interrupt chemotherapy in COVID-19-positive patients (I = 75%, C = 55%, and E = 83.3%) and for use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis for neutropenia (I = 65%, C = 62.9%, and E = 50%). The main differences emerged regarding the management of stage I and stage IIA disease, likely because of cultural and geographical differences. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the common efforts of GCT experts in Europe and Canada to maintain high standards of treatment for patients with GCT with few changes in their management during the COVID-19 pandemic. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Despite the chaos, disruptions, and fears fomented by the COVID-19 illness, oncology care teams in Italy, other European countries, and Canada are delivering the enormous promise of curative management strategies for patients with testicular cancer and other germ cell tumors. At the same time, these teams are applying safe and innovative solutions and sharing best practices to minimize frequency and intensity of patient contacts with thinly stretched health care capacity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/therapy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Canada/epidemiology , Cancer Care Facilities/trends , Europe/epidemiology , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Humans , Oncologists/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telemedicine/trends
7.
Cancer Control ; 27(3): 1073274820941973, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32755231

ABSTRACT

The world is facing the pandemic linked to COVID-19 virus infection that has rapidly spread worldwide, and severe complications have been reported to occur in around a third of patients. To date, there is no approved vaccine or specific therapy against COVID-19, but many trials are ongoing with some of them showing promising results. It has been shown recently that patients with cancer are at high risk of infection and they are more susceptible to develop severe events such as the necessity of invasive ventilation and death. Therefore, this crisis presents a real challenge for health systems especially in low- and middle-income countries where the health systems are already fragile such as African countries. In this article, we describe the epidemiological situation of the infection in Morocco and the different challenges in cancer centers in the era of COVID-19, in addition to various strategies that have been implemented to prevent and control the infection spread in oncological units in order to ensure the continuation of adequate cancer care.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/standards , Cancer Care Facilities/trends , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Neoplasms/therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Morocco/epidemiology , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Oncology Service, Hospital , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Clin Exp Dent Res ; 6(3): 356-362, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32488959

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Reliable data describing the trends and clinicopathological characteristics of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in the Nepalese population are very limited. The current study aimed to examine the demographics, trend, and clinicopathological characteristics of OSCC reported to the main referral/tertiary cancer hospital, the B.P. Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital (BPKMCH) in Nepal for a period of 11 years (1999-2009). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Data were retrieved retrospectively from hospital register maintained in the Department of Ear, Nose, Throat at BPKMCH, categorized into demographic and clinicopathological variables and SPSS (V25) was used for the analysis. RESULTS: In a period of 11 years, 3,452 cases of head and neck cancer were registered at the Department of Ear, Nose, Throat, BPKMCH. Out of 1,111 oral cancer cases, 1,081 (97.3%) were OSCC. A trend for increasing number of OSCCs presenting to BPKMCH was observed during that period. OSCC was found to be more common among males (73.0%), Brahmin/Chhetri ethnic groups (33.0%), in age group of 51-60 years (31.9%), and in Terai region (62.0%). Tongue (42.8%) was the most common site, followed by buccal mucosa (27.2%). Nevertheless, when stratified with respect to the geographical location and ethnicity, buccal mucosa was the most common site for OSCC in Terai region (63.9%, p = .002) and in Madhesi ethnic group (34.2%, p < .001). Majority of OSCC cases were diagnosed at advanced stage (49.7%, Stage IV) and received a combination therapy (42.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-based records can provide valuable information on disease characteristics in countries like Nepal. This study revealed that the clinicopathological characteristics of OSCC in Nepal follow the global trend. Nevertheless, relationship between specific intraoral sites for OSCC with geographic location and ethnic groups is an interesting observation and requires further population-based studies to clarify these findings.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/trends , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Tertiary Care Centers/trends , Adult , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Nepal/epidemiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors
10.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 182(2): 367-379, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32474745

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The role and uptake of internal mammary nodal irradiation (IMNI) is variable. This study was designed to quantify the rates and determinants of IMNI at a tertiary cancer center. METHODS: Consecutively treated breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant locoregional radiation therapy (RT) from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017 were sorted by IMNI receipt, disease risk and time period of RT delivery (2012-2015 vs 2016-2017). Differences between risk categories and groups were evaluated using χ2/Fisher's and Mann-Whitney test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to determine factors associated with IMNI receipt. RESULTS: A total of 1566 patients were eligible, with 376 in Group 1 (IMNI), and 1190 in Group 2 (no IMNI). The proportion of patients receiving IMNI increased significantly each year (p < 0.0001), and 83% of patients receiving IMNI had pT1-2/pN1 disease. On univariable analysis, younger age, lymphovascular invasion, medial/central quadrant, higher stage, PR negative, mastectomy, axillary dissection, receipt of chemotherapy and nodal positivity had higher odds of IMNI. On multivariable analysis, younger age (p = < 0.001), medial/central quadrant (p = 0.0026), PR negative (p = 0.0011), mastectomy (p = 0.0055), increasing nodal positivity (p < 0.0001) and late cohort (p = 0.001) had increased likelihood of IMNI. The use of deep-inspiration breath hold was significantly higher in those receiving IMNI (45% vs 26%, p < 0.0001), and permitted achievement of acceptable mean heart and lung doses. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant increase in IMNI utilization after 2015. Younger age, medial/central quadrant, PR-negative and node-positive disease predicted for receipt of IMNI. Modern RT techniques permit the safe delivery of IMNI.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Lymphatic Metastasis/therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Axilla , Breast/pathology , Breast/radiation effects , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cancer Care Facilities/trends , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/trends , Female , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/radiation effects , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Neoadjuvant Therapy/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/trends , Tertiary Care Centers/trends
13.
Cancer Med ; 9(19): 6933-6945, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441450

ABSTRACT

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a common adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer. While outcome disparities between pediatric vs. adult centers [locus of care (LOC)] have been demonstrated in other AYA cancers such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia, they have not been well studied in HL. We therefore compared population-based treatment patterns and outcomes in AYA HL by LOC. The IMPACT Cohort includes data on all Ontario, Canada AYA (15-21 years) diagnosed with HL between 1992 and 2012. Linkage to population-based health administrative data identified late effects. We examined LOC-based differences in treatment modalities, cumulative doses, event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and late effects. Among 954 AYA, 711 (74.5%) received therapy at adult centers. Pediatric center AYA experienced higher rates of radiation therapy but lower cumulative doses of doxorubicin and bleomycin. 10-year EFS did not differ between pediatric vs. adult cancer vs. community centers (83.8% ± 2.4% vs. 82.8% ± 1.6% vs. 82.7%±3.0%; P = .71); LOC was not significantly associated with either EFS or OS in multivariable analyses. Higher incidences of second malignancies in pediatric center AYA and of cardiovascular events in adult center AYA were observed, but were not significant. In conclusion, while pediatric and adult centers used different treatment strategies, outcomes were equivalent. Differences in treatment exposures are however likely to result in different late-effect risks. Protocol choice should be guided by individual late-effect risk.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Cancer Care Facilities/trends , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Adolescent , Age Factors , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bleomycin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Humans , Male , Ontario , Progression-Free Survival , Radiotherapy/trends , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Young Adult
15.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 26(1): 93-98, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30955466

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Drug treatment for cancer has changed dramatically over the past decade with many new drugs often with multiple applications. More recently, the detailed pathway for approval from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK has been simplified. To explore how these changes have impacted on systemic anti-cancer therapy tumour site-specific prescribing and workload activities, we have reviewed the prescribing records for 2014-2018 in a UK cancer network. METHODS: Information about the numbers of new systemic anti-cancer therapy drugs and NICE approvals were obtained from print editions of the British National Formulary (BNF) and the NICE website. Data on the numbers of new chemotherapy courses and individual treatment-related attendances were obtained from the cancer network Chemocare electronic prescribing system. RESULTS: During the five-year study period, there were 49 new systemic anti-cancer therapy drugs for all tumour types, and a total of 65 NICE technology approvals for solid tumour indications. Overall numbers of treatment courses increased by 40.7% and total treatment-related visits by 80.6%. There was a wide variation across tumour types with the highest number of increased visits seen for melanoma (349.3%) and prostate cancer (242.3%), but in contrast, no appreciable increases were seen for lower gastrointestinal cancers or small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the major impact of the arrival of new drug technology and positive NICE appraisals on increasing systemic anti-cancer therapy prescribing and chemotherapy unit activity. The data in this study may be of help in planning for future service delivery planning and workforce configurations.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Cancer Care Facilities/trends , Community Networks/trends , Drug Delivery Systems/trends , Drugs, Investigational/administration & dosage , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Humans , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
16.
Br J Radiol ; 93(1107): 20190787, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31794249

ABSTRACT

Owing to the favorable physical and biological properties of swift ions in matter, their application to radiation therapy for highly selective cancer treatment is rapidly spreading worldwide. To date, over 90 ion therapy facilities are operational, predominantly with proton beams, and about the same amount is under construction or planning.Over the last decades, considerable developments have been achieved in accelerator technology, beam delivery and medical physics to enhance conformation of the dose delivery to complex shaped tumor volumes, with excellent sparing of surrounding normal tissue and critical organs. Nevertheless, full clinical exploitation of the ion beam advantages is still challenged, especially by uncertainties in the knowledge of the beam range in the actual patient anatomy during the fractionated course of treatment, thus calling for continued multidisciplinary research in this rapidly emerging field.This contribution will review latest developments aiming to image the patient with the same beam quality as for therapy prior to treatment, and to visualize in-vivo the treatment delivery by exploiting irradiation-induced physical emissions, with different level of maturity from proof-of-concept studies in phantoms and first in-silico studies up to clinical testing and initial clinical evaluation.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Proton Therapy/trends , Absorption, Radiation , Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Cancer Care Facilities/trends , Humans , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Positron-Emission Tomography , Proton Therapy/methods , Proton Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided , Uncertainty
18.
World J Surg Oncol ; 17(1): 207, 2019 Dec 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31801561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We evaluated clinicopathological changes of breast cancer (BC) during a 22-year time period among the Iranian population. METHODS: This study is part of the largest BC registry in Iran. Patients were categorized as those diagnosed with BC during 1993-2005, 2006-2011, and 2012-2017 and compared regarding baseline characteristics and socioeconomical determinants, and obstetrical/gynecological and BC characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 688, 1871, and 3020 patients entered the 1993-2005, 2006-2012, and 2012-2017 year groups, respectively. Mean (SD) age at first presentation of BC increased throughout the year groups (47.40 ± 10.34, 49.12 ± 11.70, and 49.43 ± 12.07 years, respectively; p < 0.001). Mean (SD) tumor size increased from 1993-2005 to 2006-2011 and decreased onto 2012-2017 (2.82 ± 1.69, 2.91 ± 1.49, and 2.66 ± 1.52 cm, respectively; p < 0.001). Number of individuals with stage 4 and grade 3 BC also showed an increasing pattern (p < 0.001). Tumor necrosis rates showed an increase onto 2011-2017 (43%, 47.3%, and 56%, respectively; p < 0.001). ER positive (62.4%, 73.4%, and 77.1%, respectively; p < 0.001) and PR positive individuals (59.5%, 64.3%, 72.6%, respectively; p < 0.001) showed an increasing trend. HER2 positive expression rates increased from 1993-2005 to 2005-2011 (24.5% and 31.5%, respectively) and decreased onto 2012-2017 (31.5% and 26.8%, respectively, p < 0.001). Number of involved lymph nodes increased (5.70 ± 6.56, 5.65 ± 6.00, and 5.95 ± 6.99, respectively; p < 0.001). Pattern of BC invasion and recurrence showed significant change (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Clinical and pathological characteristics may be showing a changing pattern among the Iranian population.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cancer Care Facilities/trends , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism , Prognosis , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
19.
World Neurosurg ; 130: e333-e337, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31228702

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Brain tumors are frequent in clinical practice and associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, many diseases can present as tumefactive lesions and mimic neoplastic lesions. We aimed to determine the frequency of pseudotumoral central nervous system lesions referred to an oncology center and the frequency of the tumor mimickers. METHODS: This was a retrospective study at the National Institute of Cancer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Medical charts of patients admitted to the Neurosurgery and Pediatrics services from 2007 to 2011 were reviewed. Clinical and radiologic features of cases initially diagnosed with primary central nervous system tumors but received a final diagnosis of pseudotumoral disease were recorded. RESULTS: Among 891 patients referred as primary brain tumors, 38 cases had pseudotumoral lesions (4.3%). Most were adults (63%), with mean age of 29.4 years, and women (60.5%). Most frequent symptoms were headache (28.9%), motor signs (23.7%), and seizures (15.8%). Mean time from initial symptoms to diagnosis was 12.2 months. Lesions were single in 84.2% of patients, had contrast enhancement in 45.6%, and surrounding edema in 17.4%. Twenty patients (52,6%) underwent biopsy. Systemic autoimmune diseases were the most frequent etiologies (28.9%), followed by idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases, infections, and vascular abnormalities (15.8% each). Good outcome with no major deficits was observed in 60.5% cases. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of pseudotumoral lesions in an oncology reference center was low. Young women were most affected, and lesions were associated more frequently with systemic autoimmune diseases. Prompt recognition is important to avoid unnecessary treatment, because most patients had a good outcome.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cancer Care Facilities/trends , Pseudotumor Cerebri/diagnostic imaging , Pseudotumor Cerebri/epidemiology , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Medical Oncology/methods , Medical Oncology/trends , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...