Recent Advances of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

Urothelial bladder cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors of the urinary system, which accounts for 90~95% of urothelial carcinoma. Despite the current standard neoadjuvant management for localized urothelial MIBC (T2-4cN0M0) is cisplatin-based chemotherapy before radical cystectomy, there still had poor performances and less overall survival benefits in patients with localized urothelial MIBC. Moreover, nearly half of MIBC patients were ineligible for receiving cisplatin because of chronic kidney disease and performance status. Although immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been identified as first or second-line treatments for localized and metastasis bladder cancer based on less adverse reactions and favorable outcomes, neoadjuvant immunotherapy had rarely used for the treatment of these patients because of less large-scale clinical randomized studies and limited outcomes. Therefore, we reviewed the advances of efficacy and safety with neoadjuvant immunotherapy for urothelial bladder cancer depended on published articles and clinical studies, which could provide more theoretical evidences and promising strategy for clinical therapeutic development.

[Antibody-drug conjugates combined with immunotherapy: a potential game changer in the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma].

Currently, treatment strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are changing rapidly. However, there are many limitations in the implementation of new surgical methods and systemic treatment options, which cannot reverse the current status quo of UTUC treatment. In recent years, antibody-drug conjugates have shown great potential in the field of cancer treatment, which can activate the immune system and enhance the effect of immunotherapy while accurately killing targeted tumor cells. The results of multiple clinical trials, including the EV-302 study, have confirmed that combination therapy can improve the survival rate of patients with advanced urothelial cancer, and may replace chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced urothelial cancer. However, there are still a series of challenges in the application of combination therapy in UTUC, such as low level of evidence, adverse reactions, and drug resistance. In the future, it is necessary to focus on clinical trials of UTUC combination therapy, further optimize antibody drug conjugates and immunotherapy drugs to adapt to the disease characteristics of UTUC, and further study the molecular biology characteristics of UTUC to meet this series of challenges.

Highlights from the 2024 ASCO Genitourinary Symposium: focus on urothelial and prostate cancer.

The 2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancer Symposium, this year celebrating the 20th anniversary, delved into key advancements in urothelial carcinoma (UC) and prostate cancer (PC). For UC, insights emerged from adjuvant pembrolizumab for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, and from the efficacy of the EV-302 study of enfortumab vedotin +pembrolizumab in the metastatic setting. In PC, adjuvant therapy with high-dose radiotherapy schedules plus long-t erm ADT was explored. In metastatic castration-resistant PC, highlights included a novel combo (cabozantinib+atezolizumab) for poor prognosis patients; confirmed benefits of ARSI+PARPi in BRCA-mutated patients; and safety considerations for ARSI treatments. The symposium continued its role as an indispensable platform for shaping specialized oncological care.

Recent developments and future directions of first-line systemic therapy combined with immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a historical perspective on treatment evolution.

Urothelial carcinoma presents significant treatment challenges, especially in advanced stages. Traditionally managed with platinum-based chemotherapy, the advent of immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized urothelial carcinoma treatment. This review explores the evolution of urothelial carcinoma management, focusing on the transition from immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy to innovative combination therapies. Pembrolizumab, following the KEYNOTE-045 trial, emerged as a pivotal ICI in pretreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma, outperforming traditional chemotherapy. However, limitations surfaced in untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients, particularly in those with low PD-L1 expression, as evidenced by trials like IMvigor130 and KEYNOTE-361. These challenges led to the exploration of combination therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors with platinum-based chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Notably, the CheckMate 901 trial demonstrated improved outcomes with a nivolumab-chemotherapy combination. A significant breakthrough was achieved with the combination of enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugates, and pembrolizumab, setting a new standard in first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Future directions involve further exploration of antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors, as seen in the TROPHY-U-01 and TROPiCS-4 trials. The review concludes that the locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treatment landscape is rapidly evolving, with combination therapies offering promising avenues for improved patient outcomes, signaling a new era in urothelial carcinoma management.

What About Variant Histologies in Bladder Cancer?

Approximately 25% of bladder cancers exhibit variant histology, an updated term used in the 2022 World Health Organization histological classification of bladder cancer. These variant histologies differ by molecular pattern and clinical behaviour, and there are some differences in treatment recommendations in comparison to pure urothelial carcinoma (UC). Some UCs also exhibit nonconventional histologic features in addition to a urothelial component. Treatment is similar for UCs with nonconventional and conventional histologies. Data on neoadjuvant treatment, bladder preservation, adjuvant treatment, and the impact of new therapies are limited for plasmacytoid, micropapillary, sarcomatoid, neuroendocrine, squamous, and adenocarcinoma variants. Therefore, upfront radical cystectomy is traditionally recommended for local management. It is important to recognise UC subtypes and their differential management. Clinical trials focusing specifically on these variant subtypes of bladder cancer are needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this paper we summarize key points for the management of uncommon bladder cancer types. We highlight the importance of correct diagnosis of these tumours for selection of the most suitable treatment.

Temporal Trends and Cancer-Specific Mortality in Nonmetastatic Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder Treated With Trimodal Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Trimodal therapy (TMT) is guideline-recommended for the management of organ confined urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (UCUB). However, temporal trends in TMT use and cancer-specific mortality free-survival (CSM-FS) between historical TMT versus contemporary TMT have not been assessed. We addressed this knowledge gap. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified nonmetastatic UCUB patients with cT2-T4aN0-N2 treated with TMT, defined as the combination of transurethral resection of bladder tumor, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Temporal trends described TMT use over time. Subsequently, patients were divided between historical (2004-2012) versus contemporary (2013-2020) cohorts. Survival analyses consisting of Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed CSM-FS. Separate analyses addressed patients with organ confined (OC: cT2N0M0) versus nonorgan confined (NOC: cT3-4a and/or cN1-2) clinical stages. RESULTS: Of 4,097 assessable UCUB TMT patients, 1744 (43%) were treated in the historical period (2004-2012) versus 2353 (58%) in the contemporary period (2013-2020). TMT use increased over time in OC patients (EAPC:+3.4%, P < .001), as well as in NOC (EAPC:+2.7%, P < .001). In OC stage, median CSM-FS was 55.3% in historical versus 49.0% in contemporary patients (HR:0.75, P < .001). Similarly, in NOC stage, 5-year median CSM-FS was 43.0% in historical versus 32.8% in contemporary patients (HR:0.78, P = .01). CONCLUSION: TMT rates have increased over time in both OC and NOC patients. Contemporary TMT patients benefit of better cancer-specific survival. Interestingly, this benefit applies equally to OC and NOC TMT-treated patients.

On the Road Towards Curing Advanced Bladder Cancer.

New therapies, including antibody-drug conjugates, are revolutionizing treatment and extending survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Although the side effects of these new options require careful monitoring and management, bladder-preserving curative treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma may finally become a reality.

Real-world treatment patterns and quality of life among patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma living in Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Asia. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of medical oncologists/urologists and their adult patients in Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey. Exploratory patient-reported outcomes included the EQ-5D visual analog scale, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life of Patient Questionnaire global health, and Brief Pain Inventory. Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Overall, 175 physicians reported data for 988 patients. Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 66.3 (10.8) years, 77% were men, and 82% had bladder tumors at diagnosis. Of patients receiving first- (n = 988), second- (n = 290), and third-line (n = 87) treatments, 81%, 35%, and 59% received chemotherapy, respectively, and 17%, 63%, and 34% received programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 inhibitors, respectively. Patient-reported (n = 319) mean (standard deviation) EQ-5D visual analog scale score was 51.8 (15.6), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life of Patient Questionnaire global health status score was 44.6 (19.9), and Brief Pain Inventory score was 6.5 (1.9; n = 315). CONCLUSION: The most common first- and second-line treatments for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma were chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein 1/ligand inhibitors, respectively. At third line, 10% of patients received best supportive care alone, underscoring an unmet need for effective third-line treatment options. Patients in all regions reported quality-of-life impairment.

The role of immunotherapy in urological cancers.

Immunotherapy is defined as a therapeutic approach that targets or manipulates the immune system. A deeper understanding of the cellular and molecular composition of the tumour environment, as well as the mechanisms controlling the immune system, has made possible the development and clinical investigation of many innovative cancer therapies. Historically, immunotherapy has played an essential role in treating urologic malignancies, while in the modern era, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been critical to urology. Urothelial carcinoma is a common type of cancer in the genitourinary system, and treatment strategies in this area are constantly evolving. Intravesical and systemic immunotherapeutic agents have begun to be used increasingly frequently in treating urothelial carcinoma. These agents increase the anti-tumour response by affecting the body's defence mechanisms. Immunotherapeutic agents used in urothelial carcinoma include various options such as BCG, interferon, anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab). Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been known for many years as a tumour with unique sensitivity to immunotherapies. The recent emergence of ICIs that block PD-1/PD-L1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab) or CTLA4 (ipilimumab) signalling pathways has reestablished systemic immunotherapy as central to the treatment of advanced RCC. In light of randomized clinical trials conducted with increasing interest in the application of immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting, combination therapies (nivolumab/ipilimumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib, pembrolizumab/ axitinib, pembrolizumab/lenvantinib) have become the standard first-line treatment of metastatic RCC. Prostate cancer is in the immunologically "cold" tumour category; on the contrary, in recent years, immunotherapeutic agents have come to the fore as an essential area in the treatment of this disease. Especially in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer, immunotherapeutic agents constitute an alternative treatment method besides androgen deprivation therapy and chemotherapy. Ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and Sipuleucel T (Vaccine-based) are promising alternative treatment options. Considering ongoing randomized clinical trials, immunotherapeutic agents promise to transform the uro-oncology field significantly. In this review, we aimed to summarize the role of immunotherapy in urothelial, renal and prostate cancer in the light of randomized clinical trials.

Chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A large real-world experience.

INTRODUCTION: First-line systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (mUC) consists of platinum-based chemotherapy in most patients and PD1/L1 inhibitors in selected patients. Multiple combination chemoimmunotherapy trials failed to show a clear benefit over chemotherapy alone. We used real-world data to evaluate clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with receipt of first-line chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination chemoimmunotherapy treatment for metastatic bladder cancer and examined differences in overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the National Cancer Database to identify patients with stage IV mUC diagnosed between 2014 and 2018, who were treated with first-line immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or combination treatment. We performed multivariable logistic regression modeling to determine factors associated with treatment receipt Adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate the association between treatment and OS. RESULTS: In our cohort of 4,169 patients, multivariable analysis identified increasing age (RRR: 1.07, 95%CI, 1.06-1.08) and comorbidity burden (, as independent predictors of receiving immunotherapy. Treatment at an academic facility was associated with increased likelihood of combination treatment (RRR: 1.29, 95%CI, 1.01-1.65). After IPTW, we found that combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; 95%CI, 0.62-0.83) was associated with improved survival compared to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with older age and more comorbidities were more likely to receive immunotherapy than chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Utilization of chemoimmunotherapy was observed to be higher in academic centers and was associated with improved survival compared to chemotherapy.

Optimizing the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing Assays in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma: Recommendations by the 2023 San Raffaele Retreat Panel.

BACKGROUND: The application of precision medicine in clinical practice implies a thorough evaluation of actionable genomic alterations to streamline therapeutic decision making. Comprehensive genomic profiling of tumor via next-generation sequencing (NGS) represents a great opportunity but also several challenges. During the 2023 San Raffaele Retreat, we aimed to provide expert recommendations for the optimal use of NGS in urothelial carcinoma (UC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified Delphi method was utilized, involving a panel of 12 experts in UC from European and United States centers, including oncologists, urologists, pathologists, and translational scientists. An initial survey, conducted before the meeting, delivered 15 statements to the panel. A consensus was defined when ≥70% agreement was reached for each statement. Statements not meeting the consensus threshold were discussed during the meeting. RESULTS: Nine of the 15 statements covering patient selection, cancer characteristics, and type of NGS assay, achieved a consensus during the survey. The remaining six statements addressing the optimal timing of NGS use, the ideal source of tumor biospecimen for NGS testing, and the subsequent need to evaluate the germline nature of certain genomic findings were discussed during the meeting, leading to unanimous agreement at the end of the conference. CONCLUSION: This consensus-building effort addressed multiple unanswered questions regarding the use of NGS in UC. The opinion of experts was in favor of broader use of NGS. In a setting where recommendations/guidelines may be limited, these insights may aid clinicians to provide informed counselling and raise the bar of precision and personalized therapy.

Grade Heterogeneity in High-Grade Urothelial Carcinomas: Does It Have an Impact on the Survival of Patients With Intermediate/High-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Who Received Adequate Adjuvant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Therapy?

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients with pure high-grade (HG) vs mixed-grade (MG) nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer who received adequate bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using data from an institutional database. The study included patients diagnosed with HG nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer at the initial transurethral resection specimen between 2010 and 2020. The initial transurethral resection specimens of all patients were reevaluated by a dedicated uropathologist. The percentage of low-grade tumor areas accompanying HG areas was determined for each case. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RFS and PFS rates were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 203 patients enrolled in the study, 69 (34%) had MG tumors. Recurrence was observed in 41 out of 134 patients (30.6%) in the HG group and in 19 out of 69 patients (27.5%) in the MG group. The 36-month RFS rates were 69% (CI: 62-77) and 72% (CI: 62-83) for the HG-urothelial carcinoma (UC) and MG-UC groups, respectively. The RFS rates were similar between groups (log-rank, P = .58). Progression was observed in 22 out of 134 patients (16.4%) in the HG group and in 4 out of 69 patients (5.8%) in the MG group. The 36-month PFS rates were 84% (CI: 77-90) and 94% (CI: 89-100) for the HG-UC and MG-UC groups, respectively. The pure HG-UC group had a worse PFS than the MG-UC group (log-rank, P = .042). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age and tumor grade were significant risk factors for the development of progression. CONCLUSIONS: The indication of MG-UC category separately from pure HG carcinomas in the pathology report seems to be an important issue that can guide patient management. In this way, both more accurate risk classification and more accurate patient counseling can be performed. More importantly, the treatment plan can be made more accurately. For more precise conclusions, our results should be supported by prospective studies with larger sample size.

The identification of a N6-methyladenosin-modifed immune pattern to predict immunotherapy response and survival in urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the immune system and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) contribute to immune therapy resistance and cancer progression in urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study aims to identify immune-related molecules, that are m6A-modified, and that are associated with tumor progression, poor prognosis, and immunotherapy response. METHODS: We identified prognostic immune genes (PIGs) using Cox analysis and random survival forest variable hunting algorithm (RSF-VH) on immune genes retrieved from the Immunology Database and Analysis Portal database (ImmPort). The RM2Target database and MeRIP-seq analysis, combined with a hypergeometric test, assessed m6A methylation in these PIGs. We analyzed the correlation between the immune pattern and prognosis, as well as their association with clinical factors in multiple datasets. Moreover, we explored the interplay between immune patterns, tumor immune cell infiltration, and m6A regulators. RESULTS: 28 PIGs were identified, of which the 10 most significant were termed methylated prognostic immune genes (MPIGs). These MPIGs were used to create an immune pattern score. Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses indicated this pattern as an independent risk factor for UC. We observed significant associations between the immune pattern, tumor progression, and immune cell infiltration. Differential expression analysis showed correlations with m6A regulators expression. This immune pattern proved effective in predicting immunotherapy response in UC in real-world settings. CONCLUSION: The study identified a m6A-modified immune pattern in UC, offering prognostic and therapeutic response predictions. This emphasizes that immune genes may influence tumor immune status and progression through m6A modifications.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a German retrospective real-world analysis.

Aim: This study assessed real-world treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in Germany. Materials & methods: Patients diagnosed with mUC from 2015 to 2019 were identified in two claims databases: AOK PLUS and GWQ. Results: 3226 patients with mUC were analyzed; 1286 (39.9%) received systemic treatment within 12 months of diagnosis (platinum-based chemotherapy: 64.2%). Factors associated with receiving treatment were: younger age, male sex, less comorbidity and recent diagnosis. In AOK PLUS and GWQ populations, unadjusted median overall survival (interquartile range) from diagnosis in treated patients was 13.7 (6.8-32.9) and 13.8 (7.1-41.7) months, and in untreated patients was 3.0 (1.2-10.8) and 3.6 (1.2-18.8) months, respectively. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with mUC in Germany receive no systemic treatment.

What is this article about? This article reports the results from a study in Germany between 2015 and 2019 that investigated how advanced bladder cancer that has spread to other organs was treated and how long people lived after diagnosis. The study looked at systemic therapies, which means treatments that affect the entire body.What were the results? Only 40% of people diagnosed with advanced bladder cancer received systemic treatment within the first 12 months. Of those who did receive systemic treatment, the majority received combination therapy that included a chemotherapy drug containing platinum (64%). Systemic treatment was more likely to be given to people who were younger, less sick, male, or more recently diagnosed. After 12 months, 56% of treated people were still alive, compared with 26% of people without treatment. On average, people who received systemic treatment lived for about 14 months, while people without systemic treatment lived for only 3 to 4 months.What do the results of the study mean? Many people with advanced bladder cancer in Germany do not receive systemic treatment. People who receive treatment are likely to live longer than those who do not receive treatment.

Management of Oligometastatic and Locally Recurrent Urothelial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize and evaluate the literature on treatment approaches for oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: There is no clear definition for oligometastatic urothelial cancers due to limited data. Studies focusing on oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancer have been primarily retrospective. Treatment options include local therapy with surgery or radiation, and generalized systemic therapy such as chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancers remain challenging to manage, and treatment requires an interdisciplinary approach. Systemic therapy is nearly always a component of current care in the form of chemotherapy, but the role of immunotherapy has not been explored. Consideration of surgical and radiation options may improve outcomes, and no studies have compared directly between the two localized treatment options. The development of new prognostic and predictive biomarkers may also enhance the treatment landscape in the future.

Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers and Tumor Antigens for Targeted Therapy in Urothelial Carcinoma.

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the fourth most prevalent cancer amongst males worldwide. While patients with non-muscle-invasive disease have a favorable prognosis, 25% of UC patients present with locally advanced disease which is associated with a 10-15% 5-year survival rate and poor overall prognosis. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is associated with about 50% 5 year survival when treated by radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy; stage IV disease is associated with 10-15% 5 year survival. Current therapeutic modalities for MIBC include neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and/or chemoradiation, although patients with relapsed or refractory disease have a poor prognosis. However, the rapid success of immuno-oncology in various hematologic and solid malignancies offers new targets with tremendous therapeutic potential in UC. Historically, there were no predictive biomarkers to guide the clinical management and treatment of UC, and biomarker development was an unmet need. However, recent and ongoing clinical trials have identified several promising tumor biomarkers that have the potential to serve as predictive or prognostic tools in UC. This review provides a comprehensive summary of emerging biomarkers and molecular tumor targets including programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), DNA damage response and repair (DDR) mutations, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) expression and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), as well as their clinical utility in UC. We also evaluate recent advancements in precision oncology in UC, while illustrating limiting factors and challenges related to the clinical application of these biomarkers in clinical practice.

Incidence and management of prostatic urethra recurrence in a cohort of 21 patients who received BCG induction for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: To describe the incidence and management of patients who develop a prostatic urethral (PU) urothelial carcinoma recurrence after Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) induction for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who received BCG induction at our institution from 1996 to 2021 (N = 642) for NMIBC. All patients with pathologically confirmed PU involvement following BCG induction with no known PU involvement pre-BCG were included. We describe the presentation, management, and outcomes for PU recurrence. RESULTS: Among the 642 patients, 21 (3.3%) patients had a PU recurrence after BCG induction. 8 (38%) patients received >2 cycles of BCG induction prior to the recurrence. Median time from induction to PU recurrence was 21 months and 12 (57.1%) patients had concurrent bladder recurrence. At the time of their PU recurrence, 14/21 (67%) of patients were deemed BCG Unresponsive. Nearly all (18/21) were high grade, and 10 were stage Tis, 7 Ta, and 3 T1, and 1 T2. 19/21 (90%) patients received bladder sparing treatment: 6 with TURBT and BCG, 6 with TURBT and intravesical chemotherapy, 5 with TURBT only, and 2 did not receive immediate treatment of their PU recurrence due to advanced stage of disease. 2/21 (9.5%) received a radical cystectomy for initial treatment of the post-BCG PU recurrence, of which all were >pT2. Median follow-up time from BCG induction to the patient's last visit was 64.5 months. Following treatment of PU recurrence, 15/18 patients had another recurrence at a median of 5 months: about 47% of recurrences were bladder only and 14% recurred only in the PU as well. About 1 patient received a RC after the second recurrence and was pT2. CONCLUSION: Patients with PU recurrences following intravesical BCG have a high-risk disease phenotype with a significant risk of recurrence. Conservative management may be appropriate for well-selected patients who do not desire a cystoprostatectomy.