Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Gastro-esophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: a Retrospective Cohort Study in Iran.

PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for locally advanced GEJ and cardia adenocarcinoma is controversial. Several studies have shown that treating these patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery leads to survival benefits, and there are also studies that have declared conflicting results. It seems that there is still room for discussion. We calculated the survival rates and pathologic responses in our patients with characteristics which we mentioned above. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic GEJ and cardia adenocarcinomas (only patients with Siewert's type I and II), who were referred to Imam Khomeini hospital (Institute of cancer) between 2005 and 2014 and received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and underwent surgery were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Evaluations were done every 3 months. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients enrolled in this study. Median follow up time was 23 months (Reverse Kaplan-Meier method). The rates of 1-year survival, 2-year survival, 3-year survival, 4-year survival, and 5-year survival were 75%, 52%, 52%, 37%, and 37%, respectively. No local recurrences occurred among patients; however, four patients experienced distal recurrence in the following locations: two cases (6.3%) in the liver, one case (3.1%) in the lung, and one case (3.1%) in the peritoneum. The rate of complete pathologic response (T0N0) was 21.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced GEJ and cardia adenocarcinoma will lead to a survival benefit.

The clinical utility of RFA in esophageal and cardia cancer patients with severe malignant obstruction.

Malignant obstruction of esophageal and cardia cancer greatly affects the prognosis and life quality of patients. However, no better regimens have been reported up to now. In recent years, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been prospectively proven in the management of some tumors. So, we investigated the impact of RFA on the malignant obstruction of esophageal and cardia cancer. In this study, we evaluated the operation duration, ablation duration, immediate compilations, etc., and followed up for 12 months. Our findings showed that there existed no technical problems in all 22 patients with a mean operation duration of 58 min and mean ablation duration of 23 min. No complication was observed in addition to postoperative low pressure in one patient and retrostenal pain in another patient. Importantly, all 22 patients obtained complete remission with normal diet and felt no sense of obstruction. Mean hospitalization time was 3 days and then the 12-month follow-up continued. To our relief, re-obstruction was not observed in all patients for 2 months. In conclusion, the entire effect of RFA was satisfactory, and patients can obtain a better life quality, less pains, and complications. So RFA should be advocated and greatly investigated by more institutes and hospitals.

Temporary placement of self-expanding oesophageal stents as bridging for neo-adjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Placement of self-expanding stents is an effective palliation for dysphagia in non-resectable oesophageal or proximal gastric cancer. The aim of this analysis was to assess the efficacy of temporary stent placement for dysphagia relief during neo-adjuvant treatment for locally advanced disease. METHODS: A total of 38 patients scheduled for neo-adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy for locally advanced oesophageal cancer (n = 29), cardia cancer (n = 8) or subcardial gastric cancer (n = 1) underwent placement of self-expanding plastic stents (n = 13) or covered metal stents (n = 25) due to severe dysphagia and weight loss. RESULTS: Instant dysphagia relief was achieved in 37 (97.4%) of 38 patients. Dysphagia scores declined from mean 3.0 +/- 0.7 before stent placement to 0.6 +/- 0.9 at restaging. After completion of the neo-adjuvant therapy 20 (52.6%) of the 38 patients underwent resection of the tumour, 5 patients (13.2%) underwent primary resection without receiving chemotherapy while 12 patients (31.6%) did not undergo surgery. Stent-related complications were observed as perforation (n = 1), mediastinitis (n = 1), tracheo-oesophageal fistula (n = 2), bleeding (n = 1) and jejunal perforation caused by a migrated stent (n = 1). Serum albumin significantly decreased in patients with progressive disease despite successful stenting (40.0 +/- 4.9 mg/dl versus 29.7 +/- 6.4 mg/dl, p < 0.05) while stable albumin levels were found in patients who underwent surgery (39.9 +/- 4.3 mg/dl versus 39.1 +/- 3.8 mg/dl, p = 0.484). CONCLUSION: Placement of self-expanding stents is highly effective for instant dysphagia relief, enabling adequate oral nutrition during neo-adjuvant therapy, but is limited by a high re-intervention rate.

[Laser and afterloading therapy: esophageal cancer]. / Laser- und Afterloading-Therapie: Oesophaguscarcinom.

In the palliative treatment of malignant esophageal stenosis endoscopic laser therapy and intracavitary radiation currently represent the best alternative. The results achieved with elimination of dysphagia, duration of the complaint-free interval, survival period, and complications are presented from a group of 167 patients. Referring to the quality of life, an evolving tendency towards the use of laser therapy instead of endoscopic intubation is reported.