A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study of Ceftazidime/Avibactam: Data Mining of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database.

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is a combination of a well-known third-generation, broad-spectrum cephalosporin with a new beta-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of various infectious diseases (especially multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The current study extensively assessed CAZ/AVI-related adverse events (AEs) in the real world through data mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to better understand toxicities. The signals of CAZ/AVI-related AEs were quantified using disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio, the proportional reporting ratio, the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker algorithms. Out of 10,114,815 records retrieved from the FAERS database, 628 cases were identified, where CAZ/AVI was implicated as the primary suspect drug. A total of 61 preferred terms with significant disproportionality that simultaneously met the criteria of all four algorithms were retained. Several unexpected safety signals may also occur, including melena, hypernatremia, depressed level of consciousness, brain edema, petechiae, delirium, and shock hemorrhagic. The median onset time for AEs associated with CAZ/AVI was 4 days, with most cases occurring within 3 days after CAZ/AVI initiation.

Evaluation of clinical and microbiological factors related to mortality in patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections treated with ceftazidime-avibactam: A prospective multicentric cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and microbiological risk factors associated with mortality in patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. METHODS: This multicentric prospective cohort study included hospitalized adult patients with a microbiologically confirmed infection treated with ceftazidime-avibactam for ≥48 hours. The clinical and microbiological risk factors for 30-day mortality were evaluated using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Of the 193 patients evaluated from the five tertiary hospitals, 127 were included in the study. Thirty-five patients (27.6%) died within 30 days. Infections with AmpC beta-lactamase-carrying bacteria were independently related to 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-4.84, P < 0.01) after adjusting for time from infection to antimicrobial prescription (P = 0.04). Further, these bacterial infections were also related to higher in-hospital mortality (aHR 2.17, 95% CI 1.24-3.78, P < 0.01). Only one patient developed resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam had worse clinical outcomes in patients with infections with bacteria with chromosomally encoded AmpC beta-lactamase. However, these findings should be confirmed in future studies.

Ceftazidime-related neurotoxicity in a patient with renal impairment: a case report and literature review.

PURPOSE: We present the case of a 67-year-old woman with severely reduced renal clearance suffering from ceftazidime-induced encephalopathy. Subsequently, we search the literature to review and describe the neurotoxicity of ceftazidime. METHODS: A search string was developed to search PubMed for relevant cases from which relevant information was extracted. Using the collected data a ROC analysis was performed in R to determine a neurotoxicity threshold. RESULTS: Our patient suffered from progressive loss of consciousness and myoclonic seizures, with improvements noted a few days after discontinuation of treatment. The dose was not appropriately reduced to take into account her reduced renal function. The highest ceftazidime concentration recorded was 234.9 mg/mL. Using the Naranjo score we found a probable relationship between our patient's encephalopathy and ceftazidime administration. In the literature we found a total of 32 similar cases, most of which also had some form of renal impairment. Using our collected data and ceftazidime concentrations provided in the literature, a ROC analysis provided a neurotoxicity threshold of 78 mg/L for ceftazidime neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Ceftazidime-related neurotoxicity is a known issue, especially in patients with severe renal impairment. Yet no concrete toxicity threshold has been reported so far. We propose the first toxicity threshold for ceftazidime of 78 mg/L. Future prospective studies are needed to validate and optimize the neurotoxicity threshold as upper limit for ceftazidime therapeutic drug monitoring.

Effectiveness and safety of cefotaxime combined with avibactam for treating multidrug-resistant E coli infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli infections are a global health challenge, notably in North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness and safety of cefotaxime combined with avibactam, aiming to mitigate these infections' impact and lessen their burden on healthcare systems worldwide. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and PICO frameworks, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across 4 primary databases on May 6, 2023. Studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of cefotaxime and avibactam were included. Key outcomes included treatment success, adverse effects, and microbiological eradication. Quality assessment utilized the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias instrument. Heterogeneity was analyzed using chi-square statistics and the I2 index. Both fixed- and random-effects models were applied as appropriate. Publication bias was rigorously evaluated using Egger linear regression test and funnel plot analysis, ensuring the study's integrity and reliability. RESULTS: The clinical cure rate derived from 8 studies showed no significant difference between the treatment groups (odds ratio [OR] = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.36, P = .86). Analysis of the bacterial clearance rate from the 5 studies also indicated no significant difference (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.42 to 2.25, P = .36). Notably, a reduced mortality rate favoring the experimental group was observed in 6 studies (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.92, P = .012). Comprehensive sensitivity analyses and the assessment of publication bias strengthened the reliability of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime combined with avibactam significantly reduced mortality among patients with multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli infections, indicating its potential as a therapeutic option, especially for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. However, extensive large-scale clinical trials are required to validate these findings.

Off-label Use of Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Real-life Experience and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Multi/extensively drug-resistant bacterial infections have recently increased and new antimicrobial options are needed for difficult-to-treat infections. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) has been approved for patients 3 months to 18 years of age, but real-life data on its off-label use in neonates and young infants are still scarce. MATERIALS: We report demographic, clinical and microbiologic data as well as outcome and safety of all cases of infants treated with CZA between January 1, 2021 and September 30, 2022 in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. We also review all neonatal cases previously reported. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients [17 males, with median gestational age 29 +2 (IQR 6 +6 ) weeks] received 31 CZA courses at a dose of 20-50 mg/kg/dose of ceftazidime q8h for suspected or proved multi/extensively drug-resistant infections. Median postnatal age at the onset of treatment was 44 days (IQR: 94 days). Twelve bacteremias, 2 urinary tract infections and 1 ventilator-acquired pneumonia were recorded. Twelve (39%) treatments were targeted, while 19 (61%) were empirically started due to known colonization with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria. All patients had received multiple antibiotics prior and concomitantly with CZA. The most common pathogen identified at targeted administrations was carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (83%). No serious adverse events attributed to the drug were detected. Twenty-one courses of CZA administration to 20 neonates with a median gestational age of 28.5 (IQR 3.5) weeks were previously reported without significant related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable clinical and microbiologic responses in neonatal intensive care unit patients treated with CZA off-label were observed without significant and unexpected adverse events in critically ill neonates.

Subacute Neurotoxicity as an Adverse Reaction to Ceftazidime: A Case Report.

Neurotoxicity associated with cephalosporins is an increasingly recognized complication, although among cephalosporins, ceftazidime is rarely reported for such an adverse reaction. Moreover, subacute, rather than acute, presentation of neurotoxicity associated with cephalosporins is rare. A 77-year-old female patient with stage 4 chronic renal disease was admitted due to cellulitis in her right lower limb, multiorgan dysfunction complicated by oliguric acute kidney injury, and a need for hemodialysis via a central venous catheter. On the 13th day after admission, she became febrile, and bacteremia associated with a central venous catheter was identified, which prompted the initiation of empirical antibiotic therapy with vancomycin and ceftazidime. After 13 days of antibiotic therapy with vancomycin and ceftazidime, the patient became confused, with temporal-spatial disorientation and myoclonus, especially in the upper limbs, with worsening renal function. Ceftazidime was discontinued, and the patient's condition improved with complete remission of symptoms on the 8th day after symptom onset. Neurotoxicity associated with ceftazidime is a rare but probably underdiagnosed adverse reaction. It is more frequent in elderly patients with previous neurological dysfunction and end-stage kidney disease and/or acute kidney injury, and it usually manifests soon after starting treatment. Early identification and monitoring of risk factors and symptoms should lead the physician to a rapid withdrawal of the offending drug.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by ß-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens: a pooled analysis from the Phase 3 clinical trial programme.

OBJECTIVES: This post hoc pooled analysis evaluated clinical and microbiological outcomes and safety in patients with infections caused by ß-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens across five Phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicentre trials of ceftazidime/avibactam in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI)/pyelonephritis and nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: In each trial, RECLAIM/RECLAIM 3 (cIAI), REPRISE (cIAI/cUTI), RECAPTURE (cUTI) and REPROVE (NP, including VAP) patients were randomized 1:1 to IV ceftazidime/avibactam (plus metronidazole for patients with cIAI) or comparators (carbapenems in >97% patients) for 5-21 days. Clinical and microbiological responses at the test-of-cure visit were assessed for patients with ESBLs, and/or plasmidic and/or overexpression of chromosomal AmpC, and/or serine carbapenemases without MBLs identified in baseline Gram-negative isolates by phenotypic screening and molecular characterization in the pooled microbiological modified ITT (mMITT) population. RESULTS: In total, 813 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 389; comparator, n = 424) had ≥1 ß-lactamase-producing baseline pathogen identified, amongst whom 792 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 379; comparator, n = 413) had no MBLs. The most frequent ß-lactamase-producing pathogens across treatment groups were Escherichia coli (n = 381), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 261) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 53). Clinical cure rates in the pooled non-MBL ß-lactamase-producing mMITT population were 88.1% (334/379) for ceftazidime/avibactam and 88.1% (364/413) for comparators; favourable microbiological response rates were 76.5% (290/379) and 68.8% (284/413), respectively. The safety profile of ceftazidime/avibactam was consistent with previous observations. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides supportive evidence of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by ESBLs, AmpC and serine carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative pathogens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01499290; NCT01726023; NCT01644643; NCT01595438/NCT01599806; NCT01808092.

Ceftazidime/avibactam-induced severe neutropenia: A case report.

Ceftazidime/avibactam is an important option for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Haematological abnormalities are rare adverse events. We describe a case of a 63-year-old male who developed severe neutropenia following exposure to ceftazidime/avibactam in the intensive care unit for the treatment of abdominal infections. Six days after ceftazidime/avibactam was prescribed, the patient experienced a sheer drop in absolute neutrophil count, down to a minimum of 0.13 × 109 /L. A bone marrow examination showed neutrophilic maturation arrest. After careful screening of all drugs used by the patient and other potential causes of severe neutropenia, ceftazidime/avibactam was suspected to be the most likely culprit and was therefore replaced by cefoperazone/sulbactam, while a dose of colony-stimulating factor was given. The next day, neutrophils rose to 3.64 × 109 /L. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of severe neutropenia associated with ceftazidime/avibactam. When neutropenia occurs during treatment, the clinician should keep this possibility in mind. Regular monitoring of neutrophil counts for timely recognition, immediate discontinuation of the drug and substitution of antibiotics are key steps in management.

Efficacy of drug treatment for severe melioidosis and eradication treatment of melioidosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of all available treatments for severe melioidosis in decreasing hospital mortality and to identify eradication therapies with low disease recurrence rates and minimal risk of adverse drug events (AEs). METHODOLOGY: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) were searched from Medline and Scopus databases from their inception until July 31, 2022. RCTs that compared the efficacy between treatment regimens for severe melioidosis or eradication therapy of melioidosis, measured outcomes of in-hospital mortality, disease recurrence, drug discontinuation, or AEs, were included for review. A two-stage NMA with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to estimate the comparative efficacy of treatment regimens. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Fourteen RCTs were included in the review. Ceftazidime plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), ceftazidime plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and cefoperazone-sulbactam plus TMP-SMX had a lower mortality rate than other treatments and were ranked as the top three most appropriate treatments for severe melioidosis with the SUCRA of 79.7%, 66.6%, and 55.7%, respectively. However, these results were not statistically significant. For eradication therapy, treatment with doxycycline monotherapy for 20 weeks was associated with a significantly higher risk of disease recurrence than regimens containing TMP-SMX (i.e.,TMP-SMX for 20 weeks, TMP-SMX plus doxycycline plus chloramphenicol for more than 12 weeks, and TMP-SMX plus doxycycline for more than 12 weeks). According to the SUCRA, TMP-SMX for 20 weeks was ranked as the most efficacious eradication treatment (87.7%) with the lowest chance of drug discontinuation (86.4%), while TMP-SMX for 12 weeks had the lowest risk of AEs (95.6%). CONCLUSION: Our results found a non-significant benefit of ceftazidime plus G-CSF and ceftazidime plus TMP-SMX over other treatments for severe melioidosis. TMP-SMX for 20 weeks was associated with a lower recurrence rate and minimal risk of adverse drug events compared to other eradication treatments. However, the validity of our NMA may be compromised by the limited number of included studies and discrepancies in certain study parameters. Thus, additional well-designed RCTs are needed to improve the therapy of melioidosis.

Comparing novel antibiotics and carbapenems for complicated intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-sparing antibiotics are needed urgently for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). Although several novel antibiotics - novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (e.g. ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam) and a novel tetracycline derivative (eravacycline) - have been developed for cIAIs, it remains unclear whether these antibiotics are comparable to carbapenems for the treatment of cIAIs. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted until 1 October 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the clinical efficacy and safety of novel antibiotics against carbapenems for patients with cIAIs were included. RESULTS: Among the 11 selected RCTs, no significant differences in clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure visit were observed between the study group and the control group on analysis of the clinically evaluable population [93.6% vs 93.7%, risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.01; P=0.84], microbiologically evaluable population (93.0% vs 94.5%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00; P=0.10) and modified intention-to-treat population (85.9% vs 87.7%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.01; P=0.13). All findings were consistent across the subgroup analyses and sensitivity tests. Similarly, no significant difference in microbiological eradication was observed between the study group and the control group (87.8% vs 89.7%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01; P=0.18). The risk of adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical efficacy, microbiological response and safety of the novel antibiotics, including ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and eravacycline, are comparable to carbapenems for the treatment of patients with cIAIs. These agents can be potential therapeutic options as carbapenem-sparing antibiotics for cIAIs.

Superiority of ceftazidime off-label high-dose regimen in PK/PD target attainment during treatment of extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cancer patients.

AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate off-label high-dose ceftazidime population pharmacokinetics in cancer patients with suspected or proven extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections and then to compare the achievement of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target after standard and off-label high-dose regimens using population model-based simulations. A further aim was to clinically observe the occurrence of adverse effects during the off-label high-dose ceftazidime treatment. METHODS: In patients treated with off-label high-dose ceftazidime (3 g every 6 h), blood samples were collected and ceftazidime serum levels measured using LC-MS/MS. A pharmacokinetic population model was developed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach and Monte Carlo simulations were then used to compare standard and high-dose regimens for PK/PD target attainment. RESULTS: A total of 14 cancer patients with serious infection suspected of XDR P. aeruginosa aetiology were eligible for PK analysis. XDR P. aeruginosa was confirmed in 10 patients as the causative pathogen. Population ceftazidime volume of distribution was 13.23 L, while clearance started at the baseline of 1.48 L/h and increased by 0.0076 L/h with each 1 mL/min/1.73 m2 of eGFR. High-dose regimen showed significantly higher probability of target attainment (i.e., 86% vs. 56% at MIC of 32 mg/L). This was translated into a very low mortality rate of 20%. Only one case of reversible neurological impairment was observed. CONCLUSION: We proved the superiority of the ceftazidime off-label high-dose regimen in PK/PD target attainment with very low occurrence of adverse effects. The off-label high-dose regimen should be used to optimize treatment of XDR P. aeruginosa infections.

Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Combination with Aztreonam (COMBINE) in a Phase I, Open-Label Study in Healthy Adult Volunteers.

This phase I study evaluated the safety of the optimal ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) with aztreonam (ATM) regimens identified in hollow fiber infection models of MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Eligible healthy subjects aged 18 to 45 years were assigned to one of six cohorts: 2.5 g CZA over 2 h every 8 h (approved dose), CZA continuous infusion (CI) (7.5 g daily), 2 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h, ATM CI (8 g daily), CZA (approved dose) with 1.5 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h, and CZA (approved dose) with 2 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h. Study drug(s) were administered for 7 days. The most frequently observed adverse events (AEs) were hepatic aminotransferase (ALT/AST) elevations (n = 19 subjects). Seventeen of the 19 subjects with ALT/AST elevations received ATM alone or CZA-ATM. The incidence of ALT/AST elevations was comparable between the ATM-alone and CZA-ATM cohorts. Two subjects in the ATM CI cohort experienced severe ALT/AST elevation AEs. All subjects with ALT/AST elevations were asymptomatic with no other findings suggestive of liver injury. Most other AEs were of mild to moderate severity and were similar across cohorts, except for prolonged prothrombin time (more frequent in CZA-ATM cohorts). These results suggest that CZA-ATM administered as 2-h intermittent infusions is safe and that some caution should be exercised with the use of ATM CI at an ATM dose of 8 g daily. If CZA-ATM is prescribed, clinicians are advised to monitor liver function, hematologic, and coagulation parameters. Future controlled studies are required to better define the safety and efficacy of the CZA-ATM regimens evaluated in this phase I study.

Central nervous system adverse events of ceftazidime/avibactam: A retrospective study using Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Many antibiotics are well known for being associated with adverse events (AEs) of central nervous system, ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is a novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. In this commentary, we analyzed reports of nervous system disorders associated with CAZ/AVI, meropenem, imipenem, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System database from January 2015 to March 2022. COMMENT: The reporting odds ratios (RORs) method was used to detect the safety signals. Up to 15.62% of CAZ/AVI AEs exhibit nervous system disorders associated with CAZ/AVI. A nervous system disorder signal was detected for CAZ/AVI compared with meropenem, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone. Compared with meropenem, imipenem, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone, encephalopathy, myoclonus, reported with CAZ/AVI exhibited significant RORs. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This study found that CAZ/AVI showed a relatively stronger sign nervous system disorder than meropenem, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone in the real world. The poor clinical outcome of these events should attract clinical attention, especially for patients with older than 65 years old and long treatment courses.

Ceftazidime encephalopathy developed without the elevation of cerebrospinal fluid concentration of ceftazidime: A case report of two cases.

BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime encephalopathy is reported to be caused by the repeated administration of ceftazidime in patients with renal impairment because of the high serum concentration of ceftazidime. Ceftazidime encephalopathy has been considered to be caused by the elevation of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentration. However, as no reports have measured CSF concentrations, the relationship with ceftazidime encephalopathy and CSF concentration has not been clarified. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: An 80-year-old Japanese man under a combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis, who had been treated for a cellulitis with ceftazidime, developed altered consciousness and was diagnosed as ceftazidime encephalopathy. His serum concentration of ceftazidime was elevated, but CSF concentration was only under 0.1 µg/mL. Case 2: An 88-year-old Japanese man with chronic kidney disease, who had been treated for a urinary tract infection with ceftazidime, developed altered consciousness and was diagnosed as ceftazidime encephalopathy. His serum concentration of ceftazidime was elevated, but CSF concentration was within the therapeutic range. However, his serum and CSF concentration of quinolinic acid was markedly increased. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with renal failure are more likely to develop ceftazidime encephalopathy. We need to pay attention to the dosage of ceftazidime and to the appearance of neurological symptoms. Ceftazidime encephalopathy was considered to be caused by the high CSF concentration, but it could be caused by quinolinic acid as neurotoxic substance.

Antibiotic allergy in children with cystic fibrosis: A retrospective case-control study.

Antibiotic allergy is a big problem that may affect the treatment and life quality of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). AIM: To evaluate predictive factors for confirmed antibiotic hypersensitivity in children with CF. METHODS: In this case-controlled study, we examined 15 patients with CF who had been confirmed with antibiotic allergy. Additionally, we included a control group of age- and gender-matched 45 CF patients with no antibiotic allergy. The diagnosis of antibiotic allergy was confirmed in the presence of a compatible history and a positive response in the drug skin test or provocation test. Multiple drug hypersensitivity was classified according to the temporal relationship of antibiotics: (i) distant, (ii) simultaneous, and (iii) sequential. The data were analyzed by conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: ß-lactam allergy was confirmed in eight patients (ceftazidime n = 5, piperacillin-tazobactam n = 3) and non-ß-lactam allergy was confirmed in two patients (ciprofloxacin n = 1, azithromycin n = 1). Additionally, multiple drug hypersensitivity in five patients (distant n = 4, sequential n = 1), among whom two patients showed hypersensitivity against ceftazidime/piperacillin-tazobactam+ ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin, two patients showed hypersensitivity against ceftazidime+ ciprofloxacin n = 2, and one patient showed hypersensitivity against piperacillin-tazobactam+ amikacin+ trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. All patients (n = 13) with confirmed ß-lactam allergy were meropenem tolerant. Multivariate analysis indicated that immediate reactions (, p < 0.001) and allergic evaluation in the first six months after the reaction (p = 0.036) were significant risk factors for the prediction of antibiotic hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION: Beta-lactam antibiotic allergy is the most commonly confirmed drug allergy in children with CF. However, unlike normal children, ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam account for the majority.

Analysis of the clinical application of ceftazidime-avibactam in China.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam were mainly reported in phase II and phase III clinical trials, rarely in the real-world study. The limited real-world study which evaluated the clinical response of this drug shown inconsistent results. This study aimed to investigate the rationality of the clinical use of ceftazidime-avibactam and to evaluate its clinical response in the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) infections in China. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of adult patients with MDR-GNB infections treated with ceftazidime-avibactam during September 2018 to August 2020. Patients' characteristics, comorbidities, microbes, laboratory indicators and medication information were collected. The rationality of ceftazidime-avibactam clinical use, and its clinical response in the treatment of MDR-GNB infections were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were included in this study, of which, 66.6% received target treatment, 26.7% received empirical treatment, and 6.7% received treatment with no indication. Only 50.0% (11/22) of patients were administrated the recommended dose according to the drug instruction or guidelines, at a median treatment duration of 10 days (range: 2-74 days). The most common source of infection was pneumonia (53.6%, 15/28). Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae was the predominant pathogen (65%, 13/20). A total of 16 patients (61.5%) achieved clinical response. Patients received target treatment had higher clinical response rate than that of patients received empirical treatment (77.8% vs 25.0%, P = 0.026). A total of 11 patients (61.1%) achieved microbiological response. One patient occurred gastrointestinal adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to strengthen the monitor of the clinical application of ceftazidime-avibactam, such as the appropriate indication, reasonable dosage and duration, to improve its clinical outcome. Our results showed that ceftazidime-avibactam might be a potencial choice for the MDR-GNB infections. However, further research are still needed to identify its efficacy and safety in the real world.

Ceftazidime-Induced Neurotoxicity in an 80-Year-Old Female With Renal Dysfunction: A Case Report.

Neurological toxicity is a relatively rare adverse reaction reported in elderly patients treated with cephalosporins. We present a case of ceftazidime-induced encephalopathy in the context of acute kidney injury in an 80-year-old female treated for a Pseudomonas aeruginosa prosthetic joint infection. During the course of treatment, the patient developed sudden confusion and disorientation. The patient's mental state progressively worsened, eventually leading to intubation and admission to the intensive care unit. As imaging and laboratory analyses revealed no alternative causes explaining the patient's symptoms, ceftazidime was stopped under the suspicion of drug-induced neurotoxicity. Shortly after ceftazidime discontinuation, the patient's condition drastically improved and returned to baseline within 5 days. This case reveals the potential severity of cephalosporin-induced neurotoxicity in elderly patients and highlights the importance of quickly detecting such adverse events in order to prevent dire outcomes.

Ceftazidime induced liver injury.

A 65-year-old woman with type II diabetes mellitus complicated by non-healing ulcers with recurrent osteomyelitis was admitted for progression of cellulitis after treatment failure with an outpatient course of amoxicillin-clavulanate. She was found to have persistent osteomyelitis and started on ceftazidime for a culture documented Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. After two parenteral doses, she had a rapid rise in liver function tests (LFTs) in a hepatocellular pattern. Due to rapid identification, all medications with potential hepatotoxicity, including ceftazidime, were discontinued and the LFTs promptly returned to baseline over 3 days. Of note, the patient did not experience any symptoms of liver injury. Other causes of acute liver injury were effectively ruled out, but the case was confounded by usage of other potential hepatotoxic medications. Still, the most likely culprit was ceftazidime, a rare cause of drug induced liver injury with very few reports in the literature.

Latamoxef-induced coagulation disorders: Incidence and risk factors.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of latamoxef on coagulation function and to analyse its risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare patients receiving latamoxef versus those treated with ceftazidime. Baseline characteristics and coagulation parameters were recorded and analysed to explore whether treatment with latamoxef increased the risks of coagulation disorders and bleeding. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total number of 162 patients receiving latamoxef and 93 patients receiving ceftazidime were included. Haemorrhagic events were similar between groups, but patients receiving latamoxef had a higher risk of coagulation disorders compared to those receiving ceftazidime. Multivariate analysis revealed that the exposure of antibiotics, especially the cumulative defined daily doses (DDDs), and the nutrition risk may be the predictors of coagulation disorders. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Latamoxef might induce coagulation disorders. Cumulative DDDs and the nutrition risk were linked with coagulation disorders.