Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatrics ; 145(2)2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31988168

ABSTRACT

Children are potential victims of chemical or biological terrorism. In recent years, children have been victims of terrorist acts such as the chemical attacks (2017-2018) in Syria. Consequently, it is necessary to prepare for and respond to the needs of children after a chemical or biological attack. A broad range of public health initiatives have occurred since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. However, in many cases, these initiatives have not ensured the protection of children. Since 2001, public health preparedness has broadened to an all-hazards approach, in which response plans for terrorism are blended with those for unintentional disasters or outbreaks (eg, natural events such as earthquakes or pandemic influenza or man-made catastrophes such as a hazardous-materials spill). In response to new principles and programs that have evolved over the last decade, this technical report supports the accompanying update of the American Academy of Pediatrics 2006 policy statement "Chemical-Biological Terrorism and its Impact on Children." The roles of the pediatrician and public health agencies continue to evolve, and only their coordinated readiness and response efforts will ensure that the medical and mental health needs of children will be met successfully. In this document, we will address chemical and biological incidents. Radiation disasters are addressed separately.


Subject(s)
Bioterrorism/psychology , Chemical Terrorism/psychology , Civil Defense , Disaster Planning , Airway Obstruction/chemically induced , Asphyxia/chemically induced , Biological Factors/classification , Biological Factors/toxicity , Child , Civil Defense/education , Civil Defense/legislation & jurisprudence , Civil Defense/organization & administration , Containment of Biohazards , Decontamination/methods , Disaster Planning/legislation & jurisprudence , Disease Outbreaks , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Government Regulation , Humans , Irritants/classification , Irritants/toxicity , Mental Health , Nerve Agents/classification , Nerve Agents/toxicity , Pediatrics , Physician's Role , Poison Control Centers/organization & administration , Population Surveillance , Primary Health Care , Ricin/toxicity , Smallpox/prevention & control , Surge Capacity , United States
2.
Pediatrics ; 145(2)2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31988169

ABSTRACT

Chemical and biological events (including infectious disease outbreaks) may affect children disproportionately, and the threat of a chemical or biological attack remains in the United States and worldwide. Although federal programs and funding support a broad range of federal initiatives for public health preparedness and response, funding at the state and local levels has been flat or is decreasing, potentially leaving communities vulnerable. Consequently, pediatricians need to prepare and be ready to care for children in their communities before, during, and after a chemical or biological event, including during long-term recovery. Some medical countermeasures for particular chemical and biological agents have not been adequately studied or approved for children. The American Academy of Pediatrics provides resources and education on disaster preparedness and response, including information on the pediatrician's role in disasters, pediatric medical countermeasures, and mental health after an event as well as individual and family preparedness. This policy statement addresses the steps that clinicians and policy makers can take to protect children and mitigate the effects of a chemical or biological attack.


Subject(s)
Bioterrorism/psychology , Chemical Terrorism/psychology , Disaster Planning , Pediatricians , Physician's Role , Bioterrorism/classification , Chemical Terrorism/classification , Child , Decontamination/methods , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Government Agencies/organization & administration , Health Personnel , Humans , Needs Assessment , Poison Control Centers/organization & administration , United States
3.
BMJ Mil Health ; 166(2): 95-98, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31154340

ABSTRACT

Following the deliberate chemical attacks in Salisbury last year, a review of UK resilience to chemical incidence was undertaken. The scope was not limited to deliberate attacks, related to terrorism, but was to include non-deliberate and accidental events. Chemical incidents have wide-reaching consequences irrespective of whether they are deliberate or not. The effects of these incidents manifest themselves in terms of immediate health consequences and will also include economic, political and public health effects that may have a much longer impact than the initial disruption. The economic consequences of the Novichok attack were devastating to the local population and businesses in both the short term and the long term, being felt over a year later. This review discusses the effects of these incidents on infrastructure, healthcare provision, law and order, economics and government at a local, regional and national level. The NHS Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response Framework was reviewed, and this provides a basic outline of advice for local government to follow in the case of chemical incidents. However, the wider issues of interdepartmental co-operation and how to maintain a response in the long term require further thought. Moreover, the methods by which interagency and regional resilience is maintained in preparing for such an event require a clearer guideline.


Subject(s)
Chemical Hazard Release/psychology , Chemical Terrorism/psychology , Civil Defense/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Resilience, Psychological , Humans , United Kingdom
4.
Neurosurg Focus ; 12(3): E1, 2002 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16212311

ABSTRACT

Individual or collective preparedness for an attack involving weapons of mass destruction (WMD) must be based on an analysis of the threat. In threat assessment one takes many factors into account, including the physical and psychological parameters of the attacker. Although the potential devastation caused by WMD is significant, there are many limitations to the effective use of such weapons. Casualty rates will likely be measured in the thousands rather than millions because of factors that will be discussed. The psychological ramifications, it should be noted, the permutations of which have not yet been defined, will be much longer lasting. In this paper the author discusses these and other characteristics of the current threat.


Subject(s)
Civil Defense/methods , Nuclear Warfare/prevention & control , Nuclear Warfare/psychology , Bioterrorism/prevention & control , Bioterrorism/psychology , Chemical Terrorism/prevention & control , Chemical Terrorism/psychology , Humans , Social Perception
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...