Coronary Artery Calcium Score Predicts Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Stable Chest Pain.

Background Coronary artery calcium (CAC) has prognostic value for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in asymptomatic individuals, whereas its role in symptomatic patients is less clear. Purpose To assess the prognostic value of CAC scoring for MACE in participants with stable chest pain initially referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Materials and Methods This prespecified subgroup analysis from the Diagnostic Imaging Strategies for Patients With Stable Chest Pain and Intermediate Risk of Coronary Artery Disease (DISCHARGE) trial, conducted between October 2015 and April 2019 across 26 centers in 16 countries, focused on adult patients with stable chest pain referred for ICA. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo either ICA or coronary CT. CAC scores from noncontrast CT scans were categorized into low, intermediate, and high groups based on scores of 0, 1-399, and 400 or higher, respectively. The end point of the study was the occurrence of MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death) over a median 3.5-year follow-up, analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression tests. Results The study involved 1749 participants (mean age, 60 years ± 10 [SD]; 992 female). The prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) at CT angiography rose from 4.1% (95% CI: 2.8, 5.8) in the CAC score 0 group to 76.1% (95% CI: 70.3, 81.2) in the CAC score 400 or higher group. Revascularization rates increased from 1.7% to 46.2% across the same groups (P < .001). The CAC score 0 group had a lower MACE risk (0.5%; HR, 0.08 [95% CI: 0.02, 0.30]; P < .001), as did the 1-399 CAC score group (1.9%; HR, 0.27 [95% CI: 0.13, 0.59]; P = .001), compared with the 400 or higher CAC score group (6.8%). No significant difference in MACE between sexes was observed (P = .68). Conclusion In participants with stable chest pain initially referred for ICA, a CAC score of 0 showed very low risk of MACE, and higher CAC scores showed increasing risk of obstructive CAD, revascularization, and MACE at follow-up. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02400229 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Hanneman and Gulsin in this issue.

The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain is responsible for millions of visits to the emergency department (ED) annually. Cardiac ultrasound can detect ischemic changes, but varying accuracy estimates have been reported in previous studies. We synthetized the available evidence to yield more precise estimates of the accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in patients with chest pain in the ED and to assess the effect of different clinical characteristics on test accuracy. METHODS: A systematic search for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for myocardial ischemia in the ED was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science, two trial registries and supplementary methods, from inception to December 6th, 2022. Prospective cohort, cross-sectional, case-control studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included data on diagnostic accuracy were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool and a bivariate hierarchical model was used for meta-analysis with paired Forest and SROC plots used to present the results. Subgroup analyses was conducted on clinically relevant factors. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included, with 5043 patients. The overall summary sensitivity was 79.3% (95%CI 69.0-86.8%) and specificity was 87.3% (95%CI 79.9-92.2%), with substantial heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses showed increased sensitivity in studies where ultrasound was conducted at ED admission and increased specificity in studies that excluded patients with previous heart disease, when the target condition was acute coronary syndrome, or when final chart review was used as the reference standard. There was very low certainty in the results based on serious risk of bias and indirectness in most studies. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac ultrasound may have a potential role in the diagnostic pathway of myocardial ischemia in the ED; however, a pooled accuracy must be interpreted cautiously given substantial heterogeneity and that important patient and test characteristics affect its diagnostic performance. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023392058).

Effect of Body Mass Index on Effectiveness of CT versus Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain: The DISCHARGE Trial.

Background Recent trials support the role of cardiac CT in the evaluation of symptomatic patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD); however, body mass index (BMI) has been reported to negatively impact CT image quality. Purpose To compare initial use of CT versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) on clinical outcomes in patients with stable chest pain stratified by BMI category. Materials and Methods This prospective study represents a prespecified BMI subgroup analysis of the multicenter Diagnostic Imaging Strategies for Patients with Stable Chest Pain and Intermediate Risk of Coronary Artery Disease (DISCHARGE) trial conducted between October 2015 and April 2019. Adult patients with stable chest pain and a CAD pretest probability of 10%-60% were randomly assigned to undergo initial CT or ICA. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke. The secondary end point was an expanded MACE composite, including transient ischemic attack, and major procedure-related complications. Competing risk analyses were performed using the Fine and Gray subdistribution Cox proportional hazard model to assess the impact of the relationship between BMI and initial management with CT or ICA on the study outcomes, whereas noncardiovascular death and unknown causes of death were considered competing risk events. Results Among the 3457 participants included, 831 (24.0%), 1358 (39.3%), and 1268 (36.7%) had a BMI of less than 25, between 25 and 30, and greater than 30 kg/m2, respectively. No interaction was found between CT or ICA and BMI for MACE (P = .29), the expanded MACE composite (P = .38), or major procedure-related complications (P = .49). Across all BMI subgroups, expanded MACE composite events (CT, 10 of 409 [2.4%] to 23 of 697 [3.3%]; ICA, 26 of 661 [3.9%] to 21 of 422 [5.1%]) and major procedure-related complications during initial management (CT, one of 638 [0.2%] to five of 697 [0.7%]; ICA, nine of 630 [1.4%] to 12 of 422 [2.9%]) were less frequent in the CT versus ICA group. Participants with a BMI exceeding 30 kg/m² exhibited a higher nondiagnostic CT rate (7.1%, P = .044) compared to participants with lower BMI. Conclusion There was no evidence of a difference in outcomes between CT and ICA across the three BMI subgroups. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02400229 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Factors influencing the indication of coronary angiography in patients presenting with chest pain unspecified: an analysis of two decades (1994-2014).

Guidelines for cardiac catheterization in patients with non-specific chest pain (NSCP) provide significant room for provider discretion, which has resulted in variability in the utilization of invasive coronary angiograms (CAs) and a high rate of normal angiograms. The overutilization of CAs in patients with NSCP and discharged without a diagnosis of coronary artery disease is an important issue in medical care quality. As a result, we sought to identify patient demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors that influenced the performance of a CA in patients with NSCP who were discharged without a diagnosis of coronary artery disease. We intended to establish reference data points for gauging the success of new initiatives for the evaluation of this patient population. In this 20-year retrospective cohort study (1994-2014), we examined 107 796 patients with NSCP from the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System, a large statewide validated database that contains discharge data for all patients with cardiovascular disease admitted to every non-federal hospital in NJ. Patients were partitioned into two groups: those offered a CA (CA group; n = 12 541) and those that were not (No-CA group; n = 95 255). Geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic variables were compared between the two groups using multivariable logistic regression, which determined the predictive value of each categorical variable on the odds of receiving a CA. Whites were more likely than Blacks and other racial counterparts (19.7% vs. 5.6% and 16.5%, respectively; P < .001) to receive a CA. Geographically, patients who received a CA were more likely admitted to a large hospital compared to small- or medium-sized ones (12.5% vs. 8.9% and 9.7%, respectively; P < .05), a primary teaching institution rather than a teaching affiliate or community center (16.1 % vs. 14.3% and 9.1%, respectively; P < .001), and at a non-rural facility compared to a rural one (12.1% vs. 6.5%; P < .001). Lastly from a socioeconomic standpoint, patients with commercial insurance more often received a CA compared to those having Medicare or Medicaid/self-pay (13.7% vs. 9.5% and 6.0%, respectively; P < .001). The utilization of CA in patients with NSCP discharged without a diagnosis of coronary artery disease in NJ during the study period may be explained by differences in geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic factors. Patients with NSCP should be well scrutinized for CA eligibility, and reliable strategies are needed to reduce discretionary medical decisions and improve quality of care.

Approach to Imaging of Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome With No Culprit Lesion Identified at Angiography.

Chest pain is a common chief complaint among patients presenting to the emergency department. However, in the scenario where the clinical presentation is consistent with acute coronary syndrome and no culprit lesions are identified on angiography, clinicians and cardiac imagers should be informed of the differential diagnosis and appropriate imaging modalities used to investigate the potential causes. This review describes an imaging-based algorithm that highlights the diagnostic possibilities, their differentiating imaging features, and the important role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for narrowing the differential diagnosis.

Frequency of extracardiac findings on "negative" CT coronary angiography studies.

AIM: To evaluate the prevalence and nature of extracardiac findings identified on computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with chest pain but without evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CTCA studies in patients referred to the hospital between January 2017 to February 2021 with chest pain and a suspected diagnosis of CAD were reviewed retrospectively for the presence of extracardiac findings. Consensus review of CTCA studies was performed by two experienced thoracic radiologists. The presence and severity of extracardiac findings, together with the likelihood that chest pain might be attributed to these, was recorded. Patient records were reviewed to ascertain the recording of extracardiac findings on initial CTCA reports and, where applicable, the nature of the follow-up. RESULTS: Extracardiac findings (n=210) were present in 110/180 patients (61%) with a mean of 1.9 findings per patient. Extracardiac findings were more prevalent in patients aged ≥65 years compared to those <65 years (p<0.001). At least one extracardiac finding with the potential to cause chest pain was present in 40 patients (22%): degenerative disc disease (n=23 [13%]) and hiatus hernia (n=6 [3.3%]) were the most common extracardiac findings. Only 37.6% (79) of all retrospectively identified findings had been initially reported and, of these, 12.7% (10) required further follow-up. CONCLUSION: Extracardiac findings are common in patients with no evidence of CAD on CTCA. The entire dataset should be evaluated for the presence of extracardiac findings that could explain chest pain symptoms on wide field of view reconstructions.

Comparing Costs of Noninvasive Cardiac Diagnostic Tests-a Population-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive cardiac diagnostic tests (NITs) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease have been estimated to cost >$3 billion annually in the United States alone and have recently undergone scrutiny over concerns of overuse. Consequently, comparing costs of different NIT testing strategies is of urgent importance to health care planning. METHODS: We utilized population-based administrative and clinical data from Ontario, Canada, to compare downstream costs between 4 available NIT testing strategies (graded exercise stress testing [GXT], stress echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography angiography [CCTA], and myocardial perfusion imaging [MPI] as well as no testing), among patients evaluated for chest pain. To compare costs among the tested (overall and by testing strategy) and nontested groups, we used a log-gamma generalized linear model to account for the skewed distribution of health care cost data, adjusting for relevant clinical covariates. RESULTS: A total of 2,340,699 patients were included in our cohort, of whom 481,170 (21%) patients received 1 of the 4 NITs. Among patients who received a NIT, 254,492 (53%) received a GXT as their initial test, 154,137 (32%) received MPI, 69,160 (14%) received a stress echo, and 3,381 (<1%) received a CCTA. After adjustment for differences in baseline patient characteristics, receipt of any NIT was associated with an approximate 12% reduction in downstream 1-year mean costs (cost ratio = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.87, 0.89) compared with those without any testing. Comparing the different testing strategies with no testing, both GXT (cost ratio = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.79-0.81) and stress echocardiography (cost ratio = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.81-0.83) were associated with the lower downstream costs, while both MPI (cost ratio = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.25, 1.27) and CCTA (cost ratio = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23, 1.35) were associated with higher downstream costs. CONCLUSIONS: In a large population-based cohort consisting of >2 million people evaluated for chest pain, we report that receipt of noninvasive testing was associated with a 12% reduction in downstream costs when compared with no testing. Graded exercise stress testing and stress echocardiography were associated with the least downstream costs, whereas CCTA and MPI were associated with higher costs when compared with no testing. These findings may help inform testing decisions in chest pain patients.

Different prognostic significance of coronary artery and aortic valve calcium in patients with chest pain.

OBJECTIVES: Coronary artery calcification (CorCa) identifies high cardiovascular risk in the general population. In this setting, aortic valve calcification (AoCa) showed contradictory results. Our goal has been to assess the prognostic power of CorCa and AoCa in patients with chest pain who underwent an ECG-gated cardiac multidetector CT (cardiac-MDCT). METHODS: A total of 528 patients without previous known coronary artery disease, with chest pain who underwent a cardiac-MDCT multidetector, were retrospectively recruited. The primary endpoint included death, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and heart failure. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients (11.6%) had an event during a mean follow-up of almost 6 years (5.95 ± 2.98). The most frequent event was acute coronary syndrome (6.4%). Total mortality was 4.5%. Patients with CorCa > 0 had more events than those without CorCa (17.3% versus 4.3%; p < 0.001). Likewise, when only patients without AoCa were considered (n = 118), clinical events were more frequent in those with CorCa (12.7% versus 3.6%; p = 0.004). After excluding patients with coronary artery disease, events were more frequent in those with CorCa (12.6% versus 4.3%; p = 0.004). The higher the Agatston score, the more frequent the events. Patients with AoCa > 0 had more events than those without (16.5% versus 7.3%; p < 0.001), but in patients without CorCa, no difference in events was seen (6.2% versus 3.6%; p = 0.471). A Cox regression analysis showed age, smoking, prior stroke, and CorCa but not AoCa to be independently related to events. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, CorCa, but not AoCa, is related to cardiovascular events in patients with chest pain who undergo a cardiac-MDCT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: We show that coronary artery calcification, but not aortic valve calcification, detected in a coronary CT scan is tightly related to cardiovascular events. Although this is a message already shown by other groups in the general population, we do believe that this work is unique because it is restricted to patients with chest pain sent to coronary CT. In other words, our work deals with what we face in our routine everyday practice. KEY POINTS: • The presence and the amount of coronary artery calcification are associated with cardiovascular events in patients with chest pain. • Aortic valve calcification is not associated with cardiovascular events in patients with chest pain.

Prognostic Value of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and RCA Pericoronary Adipose Tissue CT Attenuation in Patients with Acute Chest Pain.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) CT attenuation of right coronary artery (RCA) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have prognostic value for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease. However, the superior prognostic value between RCA PCAT CT attenuation and NAFLD remains unclear in patients with acute chest pain. This study is to evaluate the prognostic value of NAFLD for MACE, and further assess the incremental prognostic value of NAFLD over PCAT CT attenuation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2021, all consecutive emergency patients with acute chest pain referred for coronary CT angiography (CCTA) were retrospectively enrolled. MACE included unstable angina requiring hospitalization, coronary revascularization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and all-cause death. Patients' baseline and CCTA characteristics, RCA PCAT CT attenuation, and the presence of NAFLD were used to evaluate risk factors of MACE using multivariable Cox regression analysis. The prognostic value of NAFLD compared to RCA PCAT CT attenuation was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 514 patients were enrolled (mean age, 58.36 ± 13.05 years; 310 men). During a median follow-up of 31 months, 60 patients (11.67%) experienced MACE. NAFLD (HR = 2.599, 95% CI: 1.207, 5.598, P = 0.015) and RCA PCAT CT attenuation (HR = 1.026, 95% CI: 1.001, 1.051, P = 0.038) were independent predictors of MACE. The global Chi-square analysis showed that NAFLD improved the risk of MACE more than that using clinical risk factors and CCTA metrics (59.51 vs 54.44, P = 0.024) or combined with RCA PCAT CT attenuation (63.75 vs 59.51, P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: NAFLD and RCA PCAT CT attenuation were predictors of MACE. NAFLD had an incremental prognostic value beyond RCA PCAT CT attenuation for MACE in patients with acute chest pain. Adding CT-FFR into the risk prediction of patients with acute chest pain is worth considering.

Coronary computed tomography angiography vs functional stress imaging to triage chest pain in the emergency room?

In patients with a suspected acute coronary syndrome, non-elevated (or uncertain) (NSTE-ACS) high sensitivity cardiac troponin, no ECG changes and no recurrence of chest pain, incorporating a coronary computed tomography angiogram (CCTA) or a non-invasive functional stress imaging test as part of the initial workup should be considered (Class IIA, Level of Evidence A). There are pros and cons with each diagnostic approach. CCTA imaging has high sensitivity for detecting coronary atherosclerosis but may not provide a diagnosis since most patients do not have obstructive coronary disease. Functional imaging is useful to explain symptoms and detect obstructive coronary artery disease, but is not useful to diagnose atherosclerosis.

Sex-disparities in chest pain workup: a retrospective cohort review of a university based clinical decision pathway.

BACKGROUND: Females have historically lower rates of cardiovascular testing when compared to males. Clinical decision pathways (CDP) that utilize standardized risk-stratification methods may balance this disparity. We sought to determine whether clinical decision pathways could minimize sex-based differences in the non-invasive workup of chest pain in the emergency department (ED). Moreover, we evaluated whether the HEART score would minimize sex-based differences in risk-stratification. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort review of adult ED encounters for chest pain where CDP was employed. Primary outcome was any occurrence of non-invasive imaging (coronary CTA, stress imaging), invasive testing, intervention (PCI or CABG), or death. Secondary outcomes were 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). We stratified HEART scores and primary/secondary outcomes by sex. RESULTS: A total of 1078 charts met criteria for review. Mean age at presentation was 59 years. Females represented 47% of the population. Low, intermediate, and high-risk patients as determined by the HEART score were 17%, 65%, and 18% of the population, respectively, without any significant differences between males and females. Non-invasive testing was similar between males and females when stratified by risk. Males categorized as high risk underwent more coronary angiogram (33% vs. 16%, p = 0.01) and PCI (18% vs. 8%, p = 0.04) than high risk females, but this was not seen in patients categorized as low or intermediate risk. Males experienced more MACE than females (8% vs. 3%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We identified no sex-based differences in risk-stratification or non-invasive testing when the CDP was used. High risk males, however, underwent more coronary angiogram and PCI than high risk females, and consequently males experienced more overall MACE than females. This disparity may be explained by sex-based differences in the pathophysiology driving each patient's presentation.

Can you accurately rule out acute aortic syndrome by restricting imaging of the aorta to the area of the patient's pain?

BACKGROUND: Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is a life-threatening condition necessitating timely and accurate diagnosis for appropriate treatment. Currently, the only way to rule out the diagnosis is advanced imaging. The most accessible is computed tomography of the entire aorta. Most scans are negative, exposing patients to radiation, increased time in the emergency department (ED), and non-significant incidental findings. This study investigated whether restricting imaging to the area of aortic-related pain accurately rules out AAS. METHODS: A health records review was conducted on consecutive cases from three academic EDs between 2015 and 2020. Data were extracted and verified from multiple sources. Participants included adults diagnosed with AAS based on radiological evidence. The diagnostic performance of the restricted imaging strategy was assessed; sensitivity and likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Data from 149 cases of AAS were collected, with the majority presenting with chest pain (46%) or abdominal pain (24%). The restricted imaging strategy demonstrated a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI 91.4-98.5%) in ruling out AAS. In a subset of patients with systolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg and without aortic aneurysm/repair (n = 86), the sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 96-100%). CONCLUSION: Restricting imaging to the area of pain in hemodynamically stable patients without known aortic aneurysm provides a highly sensitive approach to ruling out AAS.

Computed Tomography Utilization for Patients Presenting with Chest Pain.

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT) is routinely used in the emergency department (ED) due to its ease of access and its ability to rapidly rule in or out many serious conditions. Freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) have become increasingly used as an alternative to hospital-based emergency departments (HBEDs). The objective of this study was to investigate if the utilization rate of CT differs between FSEDs and HBEDs for chest pain. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patients presenting to 17 EDs within a large integrated healthcare system between May 1, 2019 - April 30, 2021 with a chief complaint chest pain. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of facility on CT utilization for chest pain. RESULTS: There were 67,084 patient encounters included in the study. Patients were predominately female (55%), white (61%), and insured through Medicare/Medicaid (59%). After controlling for predictive variables which included Charlson Comorbidity Index, ESI, age, sex, and race, patients who presented to FSEDs with chest pain were less likely to have a CT than those who presented to a HBED (AOR = 0.85, CI (0.81-0.90). CONCLUSION: CT scans of the chest are utilized less frequently at FSEDs compared to HBEDs for patient presenting with chest pain.

Evaluating Radiation Exposure in Patients with Stable Chest Pain in the SCOT-HEART Trial.

Background In the Scottish Computed Tomography of the Heart (SCOT-HEART) trial in individuals with stable chest pain, a treatment strategy based on coronary CT angiography (CTA) led to improved outcomes. Purpose To assess 5-year cumulative radiation doses of participants undergoing investigation for suspected angina due to coronary artery disease with or without coronary CTA. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis of the SCOT-HEART trial included data from six of 12 recruiting sites and two of three imaging sites. Participants were recruited between November 18, 2010, and September 24, 2014, with follow-up through January 31, 2018. Study participants had been randomized (at a one-to-one ratio) to standard care with CT (n = 1466) or standard care alone (n = 1428). Imaging was performed on a 64-detector (n = 223) or 320-detector row scanner (n = 1466). Radiation dose from CT (dose-length product), SPECT (injected activity), and invasive coronary angiography (ICA; kerma-area product) was assessed for 5 years after enrollment. Effective dose was calculated using conversion factors appropriate for the imaging modality and body region imaged (using 0.026 mSv/mGy · cm for cardiac CT). Results Cumulative radiation dose was assessed in 2894 participants. Median effective dose was 3.0 mSv (IQR, 2.6-3.3 mSv) for coronary calcium scoring, 4.1 mSv (IQR, 2.6-6.1 mSv) for coronary CTA, 7.4 mSv (IQR, 6.2-8.5 mSv) for SPECT, and 4.1 mSv (IQR, 2.5-6.8 mSv) for ICA. After 5 years, total per-participant cumulative dose was higher in the CT group (median, 8.1 mSv; IQR, 5.5-12.4 mSv) compared with standard-care group (median, 0 mSv; IQR, 0-4.5 mSv; P < .001). In participants who underwent any imaging, cumulative radiation exposure was higher in the CT group (n = 1345; median, 8.6 mSv; IQR, 6.1-13.3 mSv) compared with standard-care group (n = 549; median, 6.4 mSv; IQR, 3.4-9.2 mSv; P < .001). Conclusion In the SCOT-HEART trial, the 5-year cumulative radiation dose from cardiac imaging was higher in the coronary CT angiography group compared with the standard-care group, largely because of the radiation exposure from CT. Clinical trial registration no. NCT01149590 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Dodd and Bosserdt in this issue.

Decline in typical angina among patients referred for cardiac stress testing.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal trends in the prevalence of typical angina and its clinical correlates among patients referred for stress/rest SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of chest pain symptoms and their relationship to inducible myocardial ischemia among 61,717 patients undergoing stress/rest SPECT-MPI between January 2, 1991 and December 31, 2017. We also assessed the relationship between chest pain symptom and angiographic findings among 6,579 patients undergoing coronary CT angiography between 2011 and 2017. RESULTS: The prevalence of typical angina among SPECT-MPI patients declined from 16.2% between 1991 and 1997 to 3.1% between 2011 and 2017, while the prevalence of dyspnea without any chest pain increased from 5.9 to 14.5% over the same period. The frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia declined over time within all symptom groups, but its frequency among current patients (2011-2017) with typical angina was approximately three-fold higher versus other symptom groups (28.4% versus 8.6%, p < 0.001). Overall, patients with typical angina had a higher prevalence of obstructive CAD on CCTA than those with other clinical symptoms, but 33.3% of typical angina patients had no coronary stenoses, 31.1% had 1-49% stenoses, and 35.4% had ≥ 50% stenoses. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of typical angina has declined to a very low level among contemporary patients referred for noninvasive cardiac tests. The angiographic findings among current typical angina patients are now quite heterogeneous, with one-third of such patients having normal coronary angiograms. However, typical angina remains associated with a substantially higher frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia compared to patients with other cardiac symptoms.