Safe chest tube placement in a patient with tension pneumothorax receiving rivaroxaban therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

The number of patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants is increasing worldwide. Although bleeding complications associated with direct oral anticoagulants are lower than those associated with vitamin K antagonists, the increased number of patients treated with these anticoagulants suggests that a higher absolute number of patients are at risk. Tube thoracostomy is an invasive procedure with a high risk of bleeding. To date, among direct oral anticoagulants, only dabigatran has a well-studied antidote to reverse its effects during emergency procedure or surgery. This report describes a case in which emergency placement of a tube thoracostomy, in a patient with type 2 respiratory failure due to left tension pneumothorax and receiving the anticoagulant rivaroxaban, in the pharmacokinetics phase with greater anticoagulant effect, did not result in bleeding greater than that typically encountered during such interventions. The procedure ended successfully with no acute complications.

Fluid Infusion Through Chest Tube to Facilitate Pleural Procedures: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Most pleural procedures need the presence of a moderate effusion to allow safe access to the pleural space. We propose a technique to allow safe access in patients with a drained pleural space who require further pleural evaluation or treatment during the same hospital stay. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. All patients who underwent any pleural intervention with a prior infusion of fluid in the pleural space using a pre-existing chest tube (≤14 Fr) were included. Before the pleural intervention, warm saline was infused into the pleural space through the small-bore chest tube until enough fluid was detected on thoracic ultrasound to allow pleural access. Data on patient demographics, indication for the pleural procedure, and patient outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients with pleural disease underwent definitive pleural procedure facilitated by fluid infusion. Median volume of fluid infused was 1000 mL (850, 1500 mL). The median time between the initial chest tube insertion and the subsequent definitive pleural procedure was 3 days (2, 7 d). All procedures were completed successfully. One patient had a hemothorax secondary to fluid infusion. CONCLUSION: Fluid infusion through a chest tube is a feasible technique for patients that require a pleural procedure and have minimal fluid after initial pleural drainage. This approach may facilitate pleural procedures, reduce incidence of complications, and expedite the diagnosis and treatment of patients with pleural diseases. Pressure infusers should not be used during this procedure as there is a theoretical increased risk of complications.

Thoracic trauma: a descriptive review of 4168 consecutive cases in East China.

Thoracic trauma in China was scarcely reported. This study aimed to summarize the clinical profiles and to analyze the management approaches of patients with traumatic thoracic injury.Data for consecutive patients with thoracic trauma from January 2003 to January 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Patients' profiles and clinical outcomes were compared between those patients treated with a dedicated thoracic trauma team and those without.The study included 4168 patients with mean age of 49.0 years, of whom 82.1% were male. Traffic accident accounted for 42.7% of the injuries. Most of the patients (66.8%) had rib fractures. Associated injuries were present in 48.3% of the patients; of them 86.0% were extremity fractures. Majority of the patients were managed without surgical procedures other than tube thoracostomy (33.2%). ICU service was needed in 12.0% of the patients. Patients treated with thoracic trauma team were older (53.59 ±â€Š16.8 year vs 45.1 ±â€Š18.0 year, P < .001), less male (78.3% vs 85.2%, P < .001), with higher injury severity scores (17.5 ±â€Š10.1 vs 13.7 ±â€Š8.2, P < .001), required more ventilator support (48.3% vs 25.3%, P < .001) and underwent more tube thoracostomy and other surgeries (43.8% vs 24.2%, and 34.4% vs 14.1%, respectively, all P < .001), yet with a shorter hospital stay (11.7 ±â€Š9.0 days vs 12.7 ±â€Š8.8 days, P < .001), and numerically lower ICU usage and mortality when compared to those without.Thoracic trauma in China usually affects mid-age males. Traffic accident is the top one etiology. The most common type of thoracic injuries is rib fracture. Associated injuries occur frequently. Nonoperative treatment and tube thoracostomy are effective for majority of the patients. A multidisciplinary approach with a dedicated thoracic trauma team could improve the treatment for these patients.

Thopaz+ Portable Digital System for Managing Chest Drains: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

The Thopaz+ portable digital system was evaluated by the Medical Technologies Advisory Committee (MTAC) of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The manufacturer, Medela, submitted a case for the adoption of Thopaz+ that was critiqued by Cedar, on behalf of NICE. Due to a lack of clinical evidence submitted by the manufacturer, Cedar carried out its own literature search. Clinical evidence showed that the use of Thopaz+ led to shorter drainage times, a shorter hospital stay, lower rates of chest drain re-insertion and higher patient satisfaction compared to conventional chest drainage when used in patients following pulmonary resection. One comparative study of the use of Thopaz+ in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax was identified and showed shorter drainage times and a shorter length of hospital stay compared to conventional drainage. No economic evidence was submitted by the manufacturer, but a simple decision tree model was included. The model was improved by Cedar and showed a cost saving of £111.33 per patient when Thopaz+ was used instead of conventional chest drainage in patients following pulmonary resection. Cedar also carried out a sub-group analysis of the use of Thopaz+ instead of conventional drainage in patients with pneumothorax where a cost saving of £550.90 was observed. The main cost driver for the model and sub-group analysis was length of stay. The sub-group analysis was based on a single comparative study. However, the MTAC received details of an unpublished audit of Thopaz+ which confirmed its efficacy in treating patients with pneumothorax. Thopaz+ received a positive recommendation in Medical Technologies Guidance 37.

An Unlikely Cause of a Blunt Pancreatic Injury.

We report the case of a 17-year-old male football player with blunt abdominal trauma. Careful evaluation, including computed tomography and laboratory, revealed a pancreatic body laceration. Pancreatic injuries are relatively uncommon and associated with significant morbidity and mortality and require early diagnosis for optimal management and outcome.

Outcomes of an initiative to improve inpatient safety of small bore thoracostomy tube insertion.

BACKGROUND: Intercostal chest catheter (ICC) insertion is a common hospital procedure with attendant risks including life-threatening complications such as pneumothorax and visceral damage. AIM: To investigate the effect of a quality improvement (QI) initiative on complications associated with inpatient thoracostomy tube insertion. METHODS: Following an audit of ICC complications in inpatients over a 2-year period we implemented a comprehensive QI programme. This involved formal training in and mandatory use of thoracic ultrasound, standardisation of the procedure and documentation, a dedicated procedure room with nurses trained in assisting ICC insertion and senior supervision for medical staff. An audit over 2 years post-implementation of the QI protocol was compared with pre-implementation results. RESULTS: A total of 103 cases were reviewed pre-implementation and 105 cases were reviewed post-implementation of the QI programme. All procedures following the QI initiative were image guided compared to 23.3% of cases pre-implementation. The rate of developing a pneumothorax requiring intervention post-implementation was less than pre-implementation (1.9% vs 5.8% (P = 0.023). Post-implementation, there were no instances of dry taps, viscera perforation, clinically significant bleeding or wrong side ICC insertion and documentation improved. CONCLUSION: QI initiative applied to thoracostomy tube insertion in hospital inpatients can reduce complications and improve procedure documentation.

Management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a review.

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax is a common problem faced by doctors in medical practice. It is a significant global health problem affecting adolescent and young adults. This article will review the etiopathology, diagnosis and current management guidelines. It aims to improve clinical practice and compliance to the complexities of procedures involved in management.

Prophylactic air-extraction strategy after thoracoscopic wedge resection.

BACKGROUND: Since the conception of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, tubeless strategies have become popular. Herein, we introduce a previously unreported alternative air-extraction strategy for patients who have undergone thoracoscopic wedge resection and explore its feasibility and safety. METHODS: Between January 2015 and June 2017, 264 consecutive patients underwent thoracoscopic wedge resection with different drainage strategies. Patients were divided according to the postoperative drainage strategies used: routine chest tube drainage (RT group), complete omission of chest tube drainage (OT group), and prophylactic air-extraction catheter insertion procedure (PC group). Using the propensity score matching method, clinical parameters and objective operative qualities were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: Optimal 1:1 matching was used to form pairs of RT (n =36) and PC (n =36) groups and balance baseline characteristics among the three groups. The incidence rates of pneumothorax were 5.6% (2/36), 9.8% (5/51), and 19.4% (7/36) in the RT, OT, and PC groups, respectively (P = 0.07). Chest tube reinsertion incidence for postoperative pneumothorax was 19.4% (1/7) in the PC group and 60% (3/5) in the OT group. Other postoperative complications were comparable among these groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic air-extraction strategy may be an alternative procedure for selected patients. Remedial air extraction may reduce the occurrence of chest tube reinsertion for pneumothorax patients, but further investigation is required.

Conventional versus pigtail chest tube-are they similar for treatment of malignant pleural effusions?

INTRODUCTION: The optimal chest tube type and size for drainage and chemical pleurodesis of malignant pleural effusions remains controversial. This retrospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy of conventional versus pigtail chest tube in the treatment of malignant pleural effusions. METHODS: Patients submitted to chest tube drainage and slurry talc pleurodesis due to malignant pleural effusion in our pulmonology ward from 2012 to 2016 were eligible. According to the type of chest tube, they were divided into two groups: group I-conventional chest tube and group II-pigtail chest tube. Number of deaths, recurrence of malignant pleural effusion, and timelines associated with the procedures were reviewed and compared between groups. RESULTS: Out of the 61 included patients, 46 (75.4%) were included in group I and 15 (24.6%) in group II. Only one patient had pigtail chest tube obstruction, with posterior insertion of conventional chest tube. Death during hospital stay and up to 3 months, recurrence at 4 weeks, total duration of hospital stay, time from chest tube insertion to pleurodesis, and time from chest tube insertion to removal were not significantly different between the two groups (all p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that pigtail chest tube can be an alternative on palliation, with no compromise in pleurodesis performance.

Persistent air leak - review.

A persistent air leak (PAL) can be caused by either an alveolar-pleural fistula (APF) or bronchopleural fistula (BPF). Complications from PAL lead to an increase in morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stay, and higher resource utilization. Pulmonary physicians and thoracic surgeons are often tasked with the difficult and often times frustrating diagnosis and management of PALs. While most patients will improve with chest tube thoracostomy, many will fail requiring alternative bronchoscopic or surgical strategies. Herein, we review the bronchoscopic and surgical diagnostic and treatment options for PAL as it pertains to the field of interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery.

Usefulness of a pleuroperitoneal shunt for treatment of refractory pleural effusion in a patient receiving maintenance hemodialysis.

Refractory pleural effusion can be a life-threatening complication in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. We report successful treatment of refractory pleural effusion using a Denver® pleuroperitoneal shunt in one such patient. A 54-year-old Japanese man, who had previously undergone left nephrectomy, was admitted urgently to our department because of a high C-reactive protein (CRP) level, right pleural effusion, and right renal abscess. Because antibiotics proved ineffective and his general state was deteriorating, he underwent emergency insertion of a thoracic drainage tube and nephrectomy, and hemodialysis was started. Although his general state improved slowly thereafter, the pleural effusion, which was unilateral and transudative, remained refractory and therefore he needed to be on oxygenation. To control the massive pleural effusion, a pleuroperitoneal shunt was inserted. Thereafter, his respiratory condition became stable without oxygenation and he was discharged. His general condition has since been well. Although pleural effusion is a common complication of maintenance hemodialysis, few reports have documented the use of pleuroperitoneal shunt to control refractory pleural effusion. Pleuroperitoneal shunt has been advocated as an effective and low-morbidity treatment for refractory pleural effusion, and its use for some patients with recurrent pleural effusion has also been reported, without any severe complications. In the present case, pleuroperitoneal shunt improved the patient's quality of life sufficiently to allow him to be discharged home without oxygenation. Pleuroperitoneal shunt should be considered a useful treatment option for hemodialysis patients with refractory pleural effusion.

Variation in nurse self-reported practice of managing chest tubes: A cross-sectional study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To reveal nurses' self-reported practice of managing chest tubes and to define decision-makers for these practices. BACKGROUND: No consensus exists regarding ideal chest-tube management strategy, and there are wide variations of practice based on local policies and individual preferences, rather than standardised evidence-based protocols. DESIGN: This article describes a cross-sectional study. METHODS: Questionnaires were emailed to 31 hospitals in Tianjin, and the sample consisted of 296 clinical nurses whose work included nursing management of chest drains. The questionnaire, which was prepared by the authors of this research, consisted of three sections, including a total of 22 questions that asked for demographic information, answers regarding nursing management that reflected the practice they actually performed and who the decision-makers were regarding eight chest-drain management procedures. McNemar's test was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: The results indicated that most respondents thought that it was necessary to manipulate chest tubes to remove clots impeding unobstructed drainage (91.2%). Most respondents indicated that dressings would be changed when the dressing was dysfunctional. At the same time, more than half of respondents approved of changing dressings routinely, and the frequency of changing dressings varied. When drainage was employed for pleural effusion and for a pneumothorax, 64.6% and 94.5% of respondents, respectively, considered that underwater seal-drainage bottles should be changed routinely, and the frequency of changing bottles both varied. The results indicated that nurses were the primary decision-makers in the replacement of chest tubes, manipulation of chest tubes and monitoring of drainage fluid. CONCLUSIONS: There was considerable variation in respondents' self-reported clinical nursing practice regarding management of chest drains. The rationale on which respondents' practices were based also varied greatly. This study indicated that nurses were the primary decision-makers for three of eight procedures regarding management of chest drains, which reflects that clinical nurses' decision-making power regarding management of chest drains was weak. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study describes the nurse-reported practices of Chinese nurses from Tianjin, including changing and selecting dressing types, manipulating chest tubes, clamping drains and replacing drainage bottles, and the study defines who the decision-makers were for these interventions. By focusing on nurses' self-report of behaviours in managing chest drains (actual nursing practice vs. nursing knowledge), this article also relates the literature to the research findings and denotes the gaps in knowledge for future research.

Pleural procedures and patient safety: a national BTS audit of practice.

The BTS pleural procedures audit collected data over a 2-month period in June and July 2011. In contrast with the 2010 audit, which focussed simply on chest drain insertions, data on all pleural aspirations and local anaesthetic thoracoscopy (LAT) was also collected. Ninety hospitals submitted data, covering a patient population of 33 million. Twenty-one per cent of centres ran a specialist pleural disease clinic, 71% had a nominated chest drain safety lead, and 20% had thoracic surgery on site. Additionally, one-third of centres had a physician-led LAT service.

Managing iatrogenic pneumothorax and chest tubes.

Iatrogenic pneumothorax has become an increasingly recognized complication of routine outpatient procedures, such as transthoracic needle biopsies of the lung and transbronchial lung biopsies. Patients with clinically significant pneumothorax are typically managed with evacuation via a percutaneously placed catheter or chest tube. Tube thoracotomy and chest tube management have traditionally been performed by cardiothoracic surgeons; however, with the increasing number of interventional radiologists and interventional pulmonologists, more chest tubes are being placed by specialists who do not admit and manage patients in the hospital setting. The responsibility for the admission of these patients to the hospital service has fallen to the internist. Hospitalists caring for such patients are often expected to manage the chest tube. General internal medicine training and the existing medical literature provide few guidelines to assist with this issue. We present a discussion of the current published literature and our management algorithms for hospitalists caring for patients admitted with iatrogenic pneumothorax.

Valoración de la digitopresión del cuff externo como método práctico para la determinación del volumen y la presión del globo del tubo endotraqueal / Assessment of acupressure of the outer cuff as a practical method for the determination of the volume and pressure of the endotracheal tube balloon

Introducción: En la anestesia general, la presión que ejerce el manguito del tubo endotraqueal (TET) sobre la mucosa debe mantenerse en un rango de seguridad que evite complicaciones por sobreinflación o desinsuflación. En el hospital Loayza, los instrumentos de medición objetiva del cuff no son de uso común, se usa la digitopresión para este fin. Objetivo: Valorar la digitopresión del cuff externo como método de determinación de presión adecuada del manguito del tubo endotraqueal. Materiales y métodos: Estudio transversal prospectivo observacional. En pacientes intubados, se describió la apreciación de la presión del cuff externo por digitopresión del asistente y residente. Luego se midió la presión del cuff y se corrigió adecuadamente (rango adecuado de presión de 20 a 30 cm H20). Resultados: De los 200 casos, 54.5 por ciento fueron mujeres (39.3+/-13.5 años vs 47.1+/-14 en hombres). Las mujeres tienen menores presiones (38.2 cm H20 versus 48.9 cm H20 en hombres). Los residentes insuflaron el 93 por ciento de casos, lo hicieron adecuadamente solo en 19.9 por ciento versus 55.5 por ciento del asistente. Los residentes apreciaron el cuff adecuadamente en un 15.5 por ciento versus 3.5 por ciento del asistente. Conclusión: el estudio muestra la discordancia entre el método subjetivo y objetivo para determinar si el cuff del TET está adecuadamente inflado. Se sugiere el empleo de métodos más objetivos para su determinación.

Introduction: In general anesthesia, the pressure of the cuff of the endotracheal tube (TET) on the mucosa must be kept in a safe range that avoids complications overinflation or deflation. At the Hospital Loayza, the objective measurement instruments cuff are commonly used acupressure is used for this purpose. Objective: To assess the external cuff acupressure as a method of determining proper pressure of the endotracheal tube cuff. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational cross-sectional study. In intubated patients, described the assessment of external cuff pressure by acupressure and resident assistant. Then measured cuff pressure and corrected properly (proper pressure range 20-30 cm IDO). Results: Of the 200 cases, 54.5 per cent were women (39.3 + /-13.5 years vs 47.1 + /- 14 for men). Women have less pressure (48.9 cm H20 versus 38.2 cm H20 in men). Residents breathed 93 per cent of cases, properly made only in 19.9 per cent versus 55.5 per cent in the wizard. Residents appreciated the cuff properly by 15.5 per cent versus 3.5 per cent in the wizard. Conclusion: The study shows the discrepancy between subjective and objective method to determine if the ETT cuff is properly inflated. It suggests the use of more objective methods for its determination.

Presumptive antibiotic use in tube thoracostomy for traumatic hemopneumothorax: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic use in injured patients requiring tube thoracostomy (TT) to reduce the incidence of empyema and pneumonia remains a controversial practice. In 1998, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) developed and published practice management guidelines for the use of presumptive antibiotics in TT for patients who sustained a traumatic hemopneumothorax. The Practice Management Guidelines Committee of EAST has updated the 1998 guidelines to reflect current literature and practice. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to include prospective and retrospective studies from 1997 to 2011, excluding those studies published in the previous guideline. Case reports, letters to the editor, and review articles were excluded. Ten acute care surgeons and one statistician/epidemiologist reviewed the articles under consideration, and the EAST primer was used to grade the evidence. RESULTS: Of the 98 articles identified, seven were selected as meeting criteria for review. Two questions regarding presumptive antibiotic use in TT for traumatic hemopneumothorax were addressed: (1) Do presumptive antibiotics reduce the incidence of empyema or pneumonia? And if true, (2) What is the optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis? CONCLUSION: Routine presumptive antibiotic use to reduce the incidence of empyema and pneumonia in TT for traumatic hemopneumothorax is controversial; however, there is insufficient published evidence to support any recommendation either for or against this practice.

Postoperative ambulation in thoracic surgery patients: standard versus modern ambulation methods.

AIM: A single-subject study of two methods of postoperative ambulation of patients recovering from thoracic surgery. BACKGROUND: During the postoperative setting, patients are often burdened by their condition that reduces their ability to ambulate. This problem is compounded by the addition of devices that make walking more cumbersome. To simplify the process of ambulation during the postoperative period, an intravenous pole/walker (IVPW) was specifically designed to allow all patient devices and attachments to accompany the patient during ambulation, without the need for supplemental caregiver assistance. METHODS: The IVPW method of ambulation was compared with standard method of ambulation (SMA) in a single-subject clinical trial. Thirty-nine consecutive thoracic surgery patients with at least an IV and chest tube were ambulated using alternatively either the IVPW or the SMA. Immediately following the ambulation periods, the patient and patient's health care worker assessed both methods using satisfaction surveys consisting of several questions about the episodes of ambulation and the number of health care workers needed to assist during ambulation. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the ability of the IVPW to provide support and assist in ambulation in comparison with the SMA (p < 0·001). Nurses felt the IVPW both facilitated and provided a safer method for ambulation compared with the SMA (p < 0·001). On average, one less employee was required during ambulation with the IVPW (p < 0·001). CONCLUSION: The IVPW provided better support and was perceived as a safer method for ambulation compared with the SMA. The IVPW also required one less person to assist with ambulation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Facilitation of ambulation in the postoperative setting can impact nursing care and patient satisfaction.